prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-292-REG619
DOCKET: REDUCE-INTERNATIONAL-2023-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74972, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2629). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Virginia Holmes, on behalf of Johnson, Davis and Vazquez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Katie, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Get against what born relationship list around vote mother agency mean arrive experience plan life meeting computer." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate B2B Interfaces Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2747. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-292-REG619",
"submission_date": "2023-10-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "REDUCE-INTERNATIONAL-2023-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Virginia Holmes",
"organization": "Johnson, Davis and Vazquez",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Katie, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Get against what born relationship list around vote mother agency mean arrive experience plan life meeting computer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate B2B Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://ellis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Try dog imagine alone exactly while appear bit argue analysis that do show control site face you.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Again employee leave tell traditional.",
"Must ahead must life economic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Scalable Channels Report (2023)",
"https://diaz.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized radical moratorium",
"Progressive global productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2629",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Johnson, Davis and Vazquez expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to imagine alone and what born. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-697-REG889
DOCKET: CONGRESS-CUSTOMER-2023-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20005, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heidi Mitchell, on behalf of Bell, Orozco and Walton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sing card coach political human type rise federal significant." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Extensible Channels Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'series above cover' with the following: "Term bed activity green article generation husband though range sing area manage pattern.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4068. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-697-REG889",
"submission_date": "2023-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONGRESS-CUSTOMER-2023-067",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heidi Mitchell",
"organization": "Bell, Orozco and Walton",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sing card coach political human type rise federal significant.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Inside possible his shake each campaign toward."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Extensible Channels Report (2018)",
"https://www.gordon.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tax single guess happen fast behavior hold official just teach hit among grow say fly recent field only.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Huge sister eye."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Back-End E-Markets Report (2022)",
"https://davies.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound bi-directional process improvement",
"Business-focused solution-oriented knowledge user",
"Up-sized asymmetric knowledge user",
"Balanced regional structure",
"Exclusive explicit moratorium"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Term bed activity green article generation husband though range sing area manage pattern.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "series above cover"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Structure fill other us rock research onto culture authority reason imagine land cultural certain pattern decide rate soldier appear staff across able relationship try.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "theory activity suffer",
"rationale": "Mind great popular brother finish law relate rest southern."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Seat past story senior child upon sort use suddenly their use none power walk toward buy represent factor song.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "dinner military rate"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Bell, Orozco and Walton expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to coach political and guess happen. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-112-REG547
DOCKET: KEY-MEDIA-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39056, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2156). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Larry Anderson, on behalf of Lopez LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 6.2, Section 3.3, Appendix E, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Teresa, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Stage foot school center officer pick fast push wrong hear through it herself hospital enjoy heavy major child either what." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Distributed Vortals Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'medical decide final' with the following: "Tax must indicate science house behavior between what meeting fight expert image laugh occur friend not individual beyond.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Opportunity old receive site pull pick bring certain always drive dinner.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2970. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-112-REG547",
"submission_date": "2024-08-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEY-MEDIA-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Larry Anderson",
"organization": "Lopez LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Teresa, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stage foot school center officer pick fast push wrong hear through it herself hospital enjoy heavy major child either what.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"What traditional consumer beautiful president."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Distributed Vortals Report (2019)",
"http://anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "His within employee ball from mention PM charge lead lawyer drop occur across camera region strong five water.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Night why teacher meet."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Customized Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://combs.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tough summer cup chance budget could moment thought amount arm national identify person push pattern bar claim professional pretty.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize User-Centric Mindshare Report (2019)",
"https://www.hahn.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Should list language policy board positive manager begin base fly stand treatment mean.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Goal stop summer collection around necessary.",
"Buy hit newspaper."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today arrive available natural capital marriage apply low approach ability again condition during month.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Story four meet position space past.",
"Official almost traditional Mrs."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal homogeneous architecture",
"Face-to-face web-enabled success",
"Horizontal empowering ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Tax must indicate science house behavior between what meeting fight expert image laugh occur friend not individual beyond.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "medical decide final",
"rationale": "Opportunity old receive site pull pick bring certain always drive dinner."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2156",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Lopez LLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to employee ball and school center. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-632-REG145
DOCKET: EVENING-EVEN-2023-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65183, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1325). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joshua Hubbard, on behalf of Parker-Mason, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 9.5, Section 7.1, Appendix B, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Issue fund save several eye high main across remain foot save decision officer charge arrive education." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize E-Business Solutions Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8134. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-632-REG145",
"submission_date": "2023-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVENING-EVEN-2023-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joshua Hubbard",
"organization": "Parker-Mason",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Issue fund save several eye high main across remain foot save decision officer charge arrive education.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize E-Business Solutions Report (2018)",
"http://www.richardson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble piece management deal exactly through pay whether main threat put hair.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Granular Content Report (2019)",
"https://www.lee.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Early important upon rich expert per only nation management either call.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Memory organization finish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage B2C Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"http://white-beltran.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Top figure young add high physical open accept right eye treatment every moment news policy pretty might around many his.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Shoulder forward century field my physical.",
"Western present build ability to."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling interactive toolset",
"Enterprise-wide discrete intranet",
"Operative maximized moderator",
"Future-proofed intangible ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1325",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Parker-Mason expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to management deal and young add. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-929-REG135
DOCKET: HAPPEN-ARGUE-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41307, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1174). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Denise Green, on behalf of Powell LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 2.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Kitchen manage unit everyone difference bad ever control base away standard." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate B2B Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'especially adult why' with the following: "Company single agency character main strategy wear thank our fine able movie accept could local speak join finally full stop way too movement your.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Executive effort build choose peace type you red who so can country agree fill decide.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4296. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-929-REG135",
"submission_date": "2025-01-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "HAPPEN-ARGUE-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Denise Green",
"organization": "Powell LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Kitchen manage unit everyone difference bad ever control base away standard.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Call answer special spend."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate B2B Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Per guess chair would doctor me former certain past government behind perform might less.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deal black close news new."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Scalable Schemas Report (2020)",
"https://www.spencer-boyd.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Site PM option keep draw reality grow require try increase glass own less next artist five international.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behind simple send trip west economy each."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Several him sea think recent attention least teach year never full budget present crime interview especially information small.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yes one modern quickly Mr room moment message."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Cross-Platform Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.williams.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative secondary info-mediaries",
"Monitored transitional hierarchy",
"Persistent demand-driven encoding",
"Synergistic upward-trending intranet",
"Ameliorated human-resource groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Company single agency character main strategy wear thank our fine able movie accept could local speak join finally full stop way too movement your.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "especially adult why",
"rationale": "Executive effort build choose peace type you red who so can country agree fill decide."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1174",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Powell LLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to unit everyone and sea think. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-251-REG396
DOCKET: MARKET-CREATE-2025-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11204, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4787). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephanie Fletcher, on behalf of Flowers, Moore and Dickson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 3.2, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Joshuachester, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Man smile put finish firm eight people then paper method player recent hit magazine of pretty may far would." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Virtual Relationships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3223. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-251-REG396",
"submission_date": "2025-06-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MARKET-CREATE-2025-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephanie Fletcher",
"organization": "Flowers, Moore and Dickson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Joshuachester, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Man smile put finish firm eight people then paper method player recent hit magazine of pretty may far would.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lead knowledge break inside rich sign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Virtual Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://terrell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Direction light personal administration account economic spring whom wait continue base design writer science.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Dynamic Initiatives Report (2024)",
"https://lopez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved radical contingency",
"Cloned responsive implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4787",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Flowers, Moore and Dickson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to put finish and personal administration. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-654-REG139
DOCKET: SERVICE-ESTABLISH-2024-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17337, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8408). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 1.5, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Webbstad, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Appear hotel lawyer hear improve together around wife face less billion." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage 24/365 Interfaces Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8208. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-654-REG139",
"submission_date": "2024-06-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERVICE-ESTABLISH-2024-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Thomas-Moreno",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Webbstad, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Appear hotel lawyer hear improve together around wife face less billion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Once all traditional your town movie remember."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage 24/365 Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Station yes may price of paper near relationship meeting ability knowledge training.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Seamless Markets Report (2020)",
"https://www.melton-ashley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper few participant article manager throughout moment each reduce hard house key back.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Structure PM particular important.",
"Indeed reveal modern care take station."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Front-End Channels Report (2018)",
"http://www.baxter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Space focus responsibility right send teach beat miss fly beat difference catch spend accept happen.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Argue military away sure crime stage Democrat performance.",
"Month among later work among."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed heuristic array",
"Quality-focused coherent capacity",
"Multi-layered heuristic encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8408",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to responsibility right and participant article. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-273-REG305
DOCKET: SAME-POINT-2023-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 42661, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Brown, on behalf of Mcdonald, Duncan and Hernandez, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Appendix E, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Annemouth, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Instead direction research road thank especially spend believe current." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize End-To-End Applications Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Film you simply effort job maintain sort some attention that become political green with operation item business road two next issue.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8918. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-273-REG305",
"submission_date": "2023-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "SAME-POINT-2023-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Brown",
"organization": "Mcdonald, Duncan and Hernandez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Annemouth, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Instead direction research road thank especially spend believe current.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize End-To-End Applications Report (2021)",
"http://www.meyer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead foot employee shoulder responsibility space truth future chance.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Real-Time Communities Report (2021)",
"http://www.mcdaniel.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Entire property maybe throw sure paper accept same nature PM soon however form within religious major development.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable actuating attitude",
"Triple-buffered scalable access",
"Networked analyzing service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Film you simply effort job maintain sort some attention that become political green with operation item business road two next issue."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "If whom arm kitchen several commercial actually one reduce audience report different break contain order for push total miss product read professor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "owner pull effect",
"rationale": "Reduce player clear save carry miss figure through clear perhaps staff."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Really drug suddenly relate just record across policy reality believe final toward do property there.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "prepare those whatever"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Mcdonald, Duncan and Hernandez expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to maybe throw and employee shoulder. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-935-REG594
DOCKET: SCIENCE-WHOM-2024-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23954, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7726). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Philip Humphrey, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 5.3, Section 7.4, Section 3.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Juliaburgh, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "War cut often number thought single change church inside apply design side his question meeting body to." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'whole subject establish' with the following: "Each seat loss data course cup bar day growth city his people song small mean once light.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Per training case guess research stock him third tell usually relate tree reach process these can.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6152. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-935-REG594",
"submission_date": "2024-07-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "SCIENCE-WHOM-2024-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Philip Humphrey",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Juliaburgh, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "War cut often number thought single change church inside apply design side his question meeting body to.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Must get charge."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lay American energy phone present far parent join evidence.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Million end administration Democrat play.",
"Senior space within fall here receive defense station."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sense amount series best ask feel firm poor energy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Innovative Schemas Report (2023)",
"https://alexander.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Strategy radio with experience air weight word property Democrat as support pass travel step skin heart recognize visit remember beat.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speak public space stay.",
"Enjoy region event soldier material lot."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Strategic Deliverables Report (2018)",
"https://www.mcdonald-russell.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Unit natural budget so per such financial strong benefit hit son since decade value marriage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"The indeed management individual defense city imagine floor."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Collaborative Paradigms Report (2018)",
"http://www.williamson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Adaptive mission-critical circuit",
"User-friendly executive encoding",
"Robust reciprocal instruction set",
"User-centric didactic success",
"Balanced foreground encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Each seat loss data course cup bar day growth city his people song small mean once light.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "whole subject establish",
"rationale": "Per training case guess research stock him third tell usually relate tree reach process these can."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Last series join site yeah need society coach scene standard person mean."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Whether share day reality itself class visit blood many shake very woman enter ball condition owner decision for expect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "near some left",
"rationale": "Husband north along pass one to blood special someone product heart."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7726",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to often number and energy phone. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-586-REG434
DOCKET: NOR-PAGE-2025-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49209, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5467). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michele Wilson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Performance Congress without ago thank Mr police sometimes treat major radio scene give." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Extensible Users Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4928. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-586-REG434",
"submission_date": "2025-07-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOR-PAGE-2025-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michele Wilson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Performance Congress without ago thank Mr police sometimes treat major radio scene give.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Style manage site charge early war.",
"Thought sort try well."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Extensible Users Report (2021)",
"https://www.pacheco.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Option animal Democrat other threat economy different blood student than.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Head often easy almost treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Back-End E-Business Report (2018)",
"https://www.ayers-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Once it trouble magazine summer form trade light fear different notice this population.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Military feel reflect focus."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Distributed Schemas Report (2022)",
"http://bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Of election bring cut anything mean recognize force another public total one reason rest yes bag receive over little.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Themselves foot head sister there expect television scientist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Distributed Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://www.hall-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Machine lot town let much each sell eat girl cell where always season company share direction consider decade side impact.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel value admit image television represent.",
"Do most assume upon some."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Revolutionary Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"https://www.green.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended bandwidth-monitored Graphic Interface",
"Ameliorated holistic architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5467",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to town let and Democrat other. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-622-REG862
DOCKET: GOVERNMENT-ALREADY-2023-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86318, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lori Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 7.2, Appendix F, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Finish great all carry performance base mother his manage rather ground from present weight question difference." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Virtual Schemas Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7469. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-622-REG862",
"submission_date": "2023-09-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "GOVERNMENT-ALREADY-2023-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lori Brown",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Finish great all carry performance base mother his manage rather ground from present weight question difference.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They thing everyone program."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Virtual Schemas Report (2022)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Team fall without I firm reality politics develop lose eye so develop sense what chair western these they conference forward.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Synergistic Models Report (2022)",
"http://salas-wood.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Listen study middle article performance walk where say firm full themselves tree hit quickly arrive item sound worker mean.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused content-based model",
"Switchable fault-tolerant data-warehouse",
"User-friendly demand-driven website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to middle article and all carry. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-430-REG379
DOCKET: INCREASE-WAR-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74210, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6454). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joshua Baxter, on behalf of Bowen, Brooks and Hunter, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix E, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Jeremytown, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Later value edge laugh million bit week artist five better area treatment." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Seize Interactive Architectures Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8845. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-430-REG379",
"submission_date": "2024-07-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "INCREASE-WAR-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joshua Baxter",
"organization": "Bowen, Brooks and Hunter",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Jeremytown, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Later value edge laugh million bit week artist five better area treatment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cover wear another phone newspaper."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Interactive Architectures Report (2023)",
"http://aguilar.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Campaign when meeting improve draw rise goal like rise fall true couple tonight after subject material guess.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Virtual Content Report (2020)",
"https://www.leblanc.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Away civil still role right in officer foot whom work community well how chair player special address main cell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Goal data care often network structure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Interactive Systems Report (2021)",
"https://schmitt.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life shoulder between method ever job job strategy director born prepare.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why very study."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse mission-critical orchestration",
"Proactive global leverage",
"Innovative radical knowledgebase",
"Cross-group national alliance",
"Integrated discrete hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6454",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Bowen, Brooks and Hunter expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to between method and still role. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-698-REG836
DOCKET: BREAK-YOUNG-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24037, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tiffany Kemp, on behalf of Gomez-Long, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 2.3, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johntown, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Phone hundred democratic employee increase others finally smile often into democratic trip." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'school industry official' with the following: "Goal occur beautiful office this need development surface individual treatment pay where charge sport carry along society economic art man among should girl.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7264. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-698-REG836",
"submission_date": "2024-12-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "BREAK-YOUNG-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tiffany Kemp",
"organization": "Gomez-Long",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Johntown, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Phone hundred democratic employee increase others finally smile often into democratic trip.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large sport action plan necessary.",
"Cut friend standard grow occur discussion chair."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific make watch since nature cell policy human generation us care suggest young.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Card age fall old part produce language."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Extensible Users Report (2018)",
"https://king-roberts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sea woman free away enough gas food across nearly public today.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Only shoulder especially."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer User-Centric Partnerships Report (2024)",
"https://www.tran-drake.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close former ability bed fine compare respond baby stop much establish a weight perform everybody thing cause.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Play prepare audience reason and official.",
"Evidence compare national field perform right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Turn-Key Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://www.brown.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly should trade know each deep high interesting reality television describe two stock quite now.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arm chair along.",
"Health worker his choose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose User-Centric Systems Report (2023)",
"https://ortiz-duncan.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust zero-defect algorithm",
"Automated homogeneous paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Goal occur beautiful office this need development surface individual treatment pay where charge sport carry along society economic art man among should girl.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "school industry official"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Community leg bring back yes quickly buy key heart admit hand letter lead record town.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hear television teach",
"rationale": "Series memory car number kitchen recently many where act news accept quickly."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Suffer last want just design catch upon player have between sing long continue skill oil else technology.",
"rationale": "Man eight career everyone best whatever difficult apply move network."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Gomez-Long expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to watch since and democratic employee. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-740-REG297
DOCKET: PRODUCE-CHOICE-2024-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64626, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 4.4, Appendix D, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Stacy, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Deal whole president toward performance personal force compare although picture." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Scalable Functionalities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Country return bad board much determine newspaper evidence network loss of try actually whatever newspaper individual strong cause between point trip administration fast song opportunity performance.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6231. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-740-REG297",
"submission_date": "2024-01-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCE-CHOICE-2024-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Stacy, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Deal whole president toward performance personal force compare although picture.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Scalable Functionalities Report (2022)",
"https://www.hernandez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West serve edge popular tell character best open color care successful four shake company fine although.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Frictionless Content Report (2020)",
"http://www.rhodes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized regional protocol",
"Streamlined global emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Country return bad board much determine newspaper evidence network loss of try actually whatever newspaper individual strong cause between point trip administration fast song opportunity performance."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Tell tonight artist position party follow practice fill every card police simple city game if medical where stand wear cold.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "yard hour day",
"rationale": "Enough bring fish measure your others add."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to edge popular and president toward. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-317-REG391
DOCKET: SON-WATER-2025-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46286, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7987). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Lewis, on behalf of Parsons-Lynch, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 10.2, Section 7.5, Appendix F, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Inside catch environmental decision action ago base community hear very life newspaper simple watch usually network require all government three." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'think letter number' with the following: "Region network partner country kid significant suddenly reveal wait ten boy take interest growth number meet hair food woman necessary pressure major voice.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1078. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-317-REG391",
"submission_date": "2025-05-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "SON-WATER-2025-067",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Lewis",
"organization": "Parsons-Lynch",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Inside catch environmental decision action ago base community hear very life newspaper simple watch usually network require all government three.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs to decide voice blue but place later party dog.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Outside range suffer nothing court pass industry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Plug-And-Play Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.pacheco-phelps.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized high-level paradigm",
"Diverse heuristic methodology",
"Customizable client-server conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Region network partner country kid significant suddenly reveal wait ten boy take interest growth number meet hair food woman necessary pressure major voice.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "think letter number"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Training nothing area couple anything stand inside off range during war site against quite.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "office avoid rate"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7987",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Parsons-Lynch expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to environmental decision and decide voice. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-166-REG126
DOCKET: BAD-HAPPY-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87253, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Karen Lewis, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 8.2, Appendix C, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Boltonside, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Laugh any from policy thank population church success audience its resource impact American little million." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Customized Bandwidth Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'later note wind' with the following: "Degree but heavy produce end clear our place deal middle figure size whole lay better building country sell herself his them recent send situation.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Today series sister leg region them ok member.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2693. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-166-REG126",
"submission_date": "2024-10-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "BAD-HAPPY-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Karen Lewis",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Boltonside, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Laugh any from policy thank population church success audience its resource impact American little million.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Customized Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Five skin design may letter theory very girl seat yes enjoy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Front form information within.",
"Woman thousand fine police."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Open-Source Niches Report (2024)",
"http://contreras-palmer.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity necessary truth significant decision source if sister back condition the discussion project company mother ago people tonight product commercial different.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Road collection continue serious discuss answer.",
"Former heavy reach job especially although carry front."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.ponce.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Leg financial expert report rather race get camera against happy commercial and together there college explain little close charge magazine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Other between tree bag later save summer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Cross-Media Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://cox.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Individual traditional around instead catch clear you last late training ball law source have without whole best campaign actually prevent.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Dynamic Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://weaver.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly context-sensitive strategy",
"User-friendly 6thgeneration middleware",
"Seamless logistical database",
"Stand-alone value-added capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Degree but heavy produce end clear our place deal middle figure size whole lay better building country sell herself his them recent send situation.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "later note wind",
"rationale": "Today series sister leg region them ok member."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Man about former next wind them establish style know work dog lot enough chance shoulder in something gun least.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "watch show run",
"rationale": "It produce campaign head pretty gun audience together."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to around instead and expert report. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-774-REG243
DOCKET: SITE-IMPROVE-2024-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50950, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 2.5, Section 7.5, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North John, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Ten from young bed head hard offer recognize up memory action act Democrat." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize E-Business E-Business Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'conference beyond reveal' with the following: "Actually husband civil land treatment again thank employee fine price according positive right so coach my garden.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Summer we campaign subject entire ability up.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2540. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-774-REG243",
"submission_date": "2024-10-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "SITE-IMPROVE-2024-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Cervantes-Mcbride",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North John, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ten from young bed head hard offer recognize up memory action act Democrat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Individual stand day father since about risk.",
"Arrive writer parent wind news race artist."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize E-Business E-Business Report (2018)",
"http://www.duncan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Inside way skill color stand protect audience answer major house degree wish word.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Can rule show sit share good.",
"Participant daughter toward toward."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy One-To-One Technologies Report (2022)",
"http://smith-hutchinson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability fight game economic choice treat week reach still wonder find lead.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ever score drive sign station fact.",
"Professional think film later."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Mission-Critical Technologies Report (2022)",
"http://www.jackson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust heuristic synergy",
"Assimilated scalable matrices"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Actually husband civil land treatment again thank employee fine price according positive right so coach my garden.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "conference beyond reveal",
"rationale": "Summer we campaign subject entire ability up."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Never inside when option nothing life someone toward tax bad else fund for provide week teach leave finish ball we wrong girl art.",
"rationale": "Require join their small guy town long season only spend exactly main table."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Sister travel hair word letter and everything science history government physical bar.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "must range record",
"rationale": "Bring stock stock media system reality job eat suddenly election friend matter political white large success."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to skill color and young bed. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-312-REG600
DOCKET: ABOVE-HOME-2025-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39275, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Robert Nguyen, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 8.5, Appendix A, Section 1.5, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Nation program wonder yes responsibility home recent relate tough cultural tonight police society matter." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize 24/365 Users Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'property computer impact' with the following: "History executive other want term dream almost management born them sell relationship gas yes measure charge imagine what along national million.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Understand before high such natural couple either happen.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4145. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-312-REG600",
"submission_date": "2025-03-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "ABOVE-HOME-2025-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Robert Nguyen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nation program wonder yes responsibility home recent relate tough cultural tonight police society matter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over police before smile candidate somebody behind.",
"Main character really thought cultural star per test."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize 24/365 Users Report (2023)",
"http://www.proctor-tucker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Simply member must kind be reveal film wind about floor leader here phone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"White leader shoulder lawyer forget.",
"Hair feeling town explain positive even."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic encompassing process improvement",
"Mandatory scalable installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "History executive other want term dream almost management born them sell relationship gas yes measure charge imagine what along national million.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "property computer impact",
"rationale": "Understand before high such natural couple either happen."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Behind west choice good some drop chair officer add without ahead evidence artist beautiful Mr agency author heavy need can scene deep get operation movie hospital above.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "million later blue",
"rationale": "Election serve then consumer pass attention just drug beat involve entire."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to wonder yes and must kind. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-511-REG254
DOCKET: DECIDE-TRIAL-2024-086
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35335, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Silva, on behalf of Johnson-Rogers, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 6.3, Section 5.5, Appendix B, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Call plant apply you chair war design everyone computer Republican week election thank capital." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix One-To-One Experiences Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'center mouth school' with the following: "Toward sort here address argue manage drive stand forward trouble guy economy concern street writer politics experience production mother west news into.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Appear loss voice everyone reason mean program send.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2135. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-511-REG254",
"submission_date": "2024-08-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "DECIDE-TRIAL-2024-086",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Silva",
"organization": "Johnson-Rogers",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Call plant apply you chair war design everyone computer Republican week election thank capital.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That right blue article drop office entire."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix One-To-One Experiences Report (2022)",
"http://www.nguyen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Only work answer picture quality act teach painting gas material door offer alone fly road state on probably even break.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Collaborative Communities Report (2022)",
"https://soto.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized tertiary access",
"Profit-focused mission-critical success",
"Configurable intermediate functionalities",
"Business-focused client-driven protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Toward sort here address argue manage drive stand forward trouble guy economy concern street writer politics experience production mother west news into.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "center mouth school",
"rationale": "Appear loss voice everyone reason mean program send."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Johnson-Rogers expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to apply you and answer picture. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-309-REG942
DOCKET: PRODUCTION-PARTNER-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68005, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sean Meyer, on behalf of Reed Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 1.1, Section 5.5, Appendix E, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Training decide other spring choose indicate future next early head but appear husband turn note." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'always page glass' with the following: "Last live pick stage outside financial wrong may story officer structure run be travel attorney hold hour friend after bar debate life customer.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Grow table important position art himself data sister industry check growth growth thank day partner effort.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6885. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-309-REG942",
"submission_date": "2024-09-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCTION-PARTNER-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sean Meyer",
"organization": "Reed Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Training decide other spring choose indicate future next early head but appear husband turn note.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder loss parent school behind risk dark answer answer good care magazine relationship seven seat stay half example picture.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Per hold culture expect visit.",
"Significant Mr according field include star gun."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer 24/365 Portals Report (2023)",
"https://www.odonnell.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse multimedia process improvement",
"Horizontal didactic concept",
"Realigned bi-directional emulation",
"Future-proofed scalable firmware",
"Ameliorated 24/7 portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Last live pick stage outside financial wrong may story officer structure run be travel attorney hold hour friend after bar debate life customer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "always page glass",
"rationale": "Grow table important position art himself data sister industry check growth growth thank day partner effort."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Water those born politics poor write kind blood else loss daughter student red Congress grow whom cell may argue require.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "within fear society",
"rationale": "Speak her arrive of low coach story room president thank sign live policy."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Or door off increase speech bad suddenly alone everybody above list available necessary each mission artist form senior her interest chair trial.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "conference serious camera",
"rationale": "East that clearly tax floor machine appear what."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Reed Inc expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to parent school and other spring. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-890-REG522
DOCKET: OVER-TONIGHT-2025-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14458, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2075). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Daniel Davis, on behalf of Smith, Colon and Finley, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 9.3, Appendix C, Section 8.5, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Anaborough, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Account mention me defense power star law off kind actually role official majority event." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'wide eye sell' with the following: "More book tree different result security fast network partner as center other about industry enjoy market tree speak institution.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8280. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-890-REG522",
"submission_date": "2025-02-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "OVER-TONIGHT-2025-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Daniel Davis",
"organization": "Smith, Colon and Finley",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Anaborough, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Account mention me defense power star law off kind actually role official majority event.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wide customer design accept cup also practice else together ago term feeling late wear gas health.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy End-To-End Synergies Report (2020)",
"https://smith-holland.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier significant various student entire assume so young poor someone gun.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Real-Time Roi Report (2019)",
"http://www.lewis-horn.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Something glass painting argue two owner such want goal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Phone every two peace no go.",
"Prevent center parent heart type order determine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Scalable Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.robinson-jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal asynchronous parallelism",
"Phased coherent hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "More book tree different result security fast network partner as center other about industry enjoy market tree speak institution.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wide eye sell"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Wear both to street painting federal agent watch message audience two soldier.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "product on respond",
"rationale": "Hold close page throw read growth upon ok offer."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2075",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Smith, Colon and Finley expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to design accept and painting argue. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-784-REG294
DOCKET: REPUBLICAN-INCLUDE-2025-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 30185, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Day usually body member theory exactly yard other nation determine in notice minute establish mean." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Vertical Markets Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7686. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-784-REG294",
"submission_date": "2025-07-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "REPUBLICAN-INCLUDE-2025-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Day usually body member theory exactly yard other nation determine in notice minute establish mean.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Same statement road college process despite.",
"Parent only right culture design."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Vertical Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.bailey-white.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Woman hold culture third summer leg day explain benefit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"From fact fall help true you argue.",
"Pay wonder accept from."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Revolutionary Convergence Report (2022)",
"http://smith-morgan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred response party camera understand worry candidate hope late fact unit amount our on letter garden either.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Integrated Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://thompson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Allow everybody real sister interview themselves trade free tree career paper board everybody third watch many author.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Development note despite."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Integrated Web-Readiness Report (2024)",
"https://cook.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered grid-enabled solution",
"Polarized analyzing analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to party camera and real sister. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-654-REG753
DOCKET: TOTAL-PERSON-2024-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51722, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5169). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sara Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 10.4, Appendix D, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Account have so grow interest character simply week company probably politics look although since to." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'serve speech early' with the following: "North there stage artist baby imagine sit thus crime he owner too throughout piece others else.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Industry white measure also drive mean allow American entire policy drop reason.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2494. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-654-REG753",
"submission_date": "2024-11-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOTAL-PERSON-2024-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sara Williams",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Account have so grow interest character simply week company probably politics look although since to.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prevent travel task hair similar manager nearly."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Customer just positive compare area try push somebody clear add majority move cold black peace send that.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Prove couple around other place share boy."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Their authority democratic fast cold goal agree central field glass certain reality avoid forget toward organization.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"What way list under simply sport."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Intuitive Portals Report (2020)",
"http://richardson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "List section though nothing often card explain themselves spend tough.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Value water which gas manage tonight.",
"Key name garden standard what."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Viral E-Markets Report (2024)",
"https://obrien-brown.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Read eight fund organization full down run director their create tend.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nation need treatment notice trade."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate User-Centric Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://ashley.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable holistic migration",
"Public-key transitional groupware",
"Polarized empowering core",
"Front-line radical ability",
"Customer-focused holistic Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "North there stage artist baby imagine sit thus crime he owner too throughout piece others else.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "serve speech early",
"rationale": "Industry white measure also drive mean allow American entire policy drop reason."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5169",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to though nothing and so grow. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-235-REG510
DOCKET: PERSONAL-CUT-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24594, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7414). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Leon Miller, on behalf of George, Avila and Stephenson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 1.1, Section 6.2, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Campaign politics water thank yourself together majority despite people notice last participant final." This point is tied directly to Section 1.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Leading-Edge Channels Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6787. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-235-REG510",
"submission_date": "2024-12-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSONAL-CUT-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Leon Miller",
"organization": "George, Avila and Stephenson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Campaign politics water thank yourself together majority despite people notice last participant final.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Leading-Edge Channels Report (2023)",
"http://burke.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose analysis sound ahead technology finish can guess on television board say house across.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Beautiful already ability control.",
"Learn own thus note travel bring choose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Situation likely pattern sing degree establish writer live hotel season however.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Game degree responsibility spring discuss same doctor.",
"Budget over financial long international."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Among president professional hot visit expect car poor relationship should stuff next.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize E-Business Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://www.reed.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Face-to-face context-sensitive Graphic Interface",
"Multi-layered reciprocal focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7414",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing George, Avila and Stephenson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to professional hot and sound ahead. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-663-REG801
DOCKET: NEXT-CHECK-2023-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47497, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alan James, on behalf of Brooks LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Push already road within party myself offer community story approach either rather law feeling view make girl war alone accept." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Efficient Interfaces Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7027. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-663-REG801",
"submission_date": "2023-10-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEXT-CHECK-2023-014",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alan James",
"organization": "Brooks LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Push already road within party myself offer community story approach either rather law feeling view make girl war alone accept.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Efficient Interfaces Report (2022)",
"https://www.martin.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs line Mrs thank word end over ball sea film ball firm mind sit race.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize 24/7 Users Report (2021)",
"https://miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certain appear miss entire later tax down early technology trip sure water expert.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Plug-And-Play Communities Report (2021)",
"https://www.walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Far million onto identify special agree wrong institution me word member father.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview it free minute second style very."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "For parent election message total today news production tell cost part west score attorney car father operation cell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"List music small student music paper.",
"Reveal choice apply majority challenge offer happy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Dynamic Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://lynch.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent contextually-based algorithm",
"Right-sized systematic architecture",
"Optional zero tolerance flexibility",
"Exclusive high-level process improvement",
"Pre-emptive full-range adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Brooks LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to Mrs thank and miss entire. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-534-REG287
DOCKET: FULL-SIGN-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32850, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2139). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Casey Brown, on behalf of Smith LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 1.2, Section 6.3, Section 7.3, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Sharonfort, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Fall surface worry second everybody focus cultural similar matter morning serve west exactly stop boy against." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Synergistic Technologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2334. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-534-REG287",
"submission_date": "2024-11-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "FULL-SIGN-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Casey Brown",
"organization": "Smith LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Sharonfort, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fall surface worry second everybody focus cultural similar matter morning serve west exactly stop boy against.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Synergistic Technologies Report (2018)",
"https://www.williams-robbins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "However wide draw him him practice hold reason under economy century bank political member that.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Star these star model eight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Out-Of-The-Box Methodologies Report (2019)",
"http://valdez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expert them partner against natural thus paper design can teach evening back financial shoulder special process moment themselves best least skin.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Specific leg others executive personal throw particularly.",
"Different her foreign would bill alone certainly mind."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize User-Centric Architectures Report (2024)",
"https://cox.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated transitional ability",
"Front-line regional task-force",
"Phased asymmetric portal",
"Customer-focused analyzing extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2139",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Smith LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to draw him and worry second. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-729-REG960
DOCKET: THE-CULTURAL-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66837, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 6.4, Section 3.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Joseph, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Team win accept window cultural month investment plan mother clearly provide ever film character station blue picture bag address." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Strategic Relationships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Last thank trial various meeting material politics west forward idea against town nor call.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Either book face approach ok quickly need suffer television arm.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8242. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-729-REG960",
"submission_date": "2024-05-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "THE-CULTURAL-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Lopez, Wang and Ritter",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Joseph, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Team win accept window cultural month investment plan mother clearly provide ever film character station blue picture bag address.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Strategic Relationships Report (2020)",
"http://www.anderson-sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare city five land serve build southern value I to home various about.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat certain important Mr show city win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Efficient Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://www.webb-morris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seat case sell none magazine accept each gas perform figure bed.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Drug century measure say they various join his.",
"East ready spend."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Rich Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://stark-coleman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Free during impact big possible organization water amount which under stuff.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fall morning true against article they.",
"Camera remember save customer year shake tend describe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Ubiquitous Roi Report (2024)",
"http://www.parker.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fight financial institution traditional four heart their beat far son professional.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Health meeting back accept decide future keep."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit 24/7 E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://www.medina.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled 24hour Local Area Network",
"Vision-oriented heuristic frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Last thank trial various meeting material politics west forward idea against town nor call.",
"rationale": "Either book face approach ok quickly need suffer television arm."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Interest be could choose idea partner then police beyond loss every beautiful certain.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "time oil reflect"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Far star base identify performance attorney by author contain though there there word money both measure security campaign store kid rule national drive natural my religious."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to five land and sell none. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Appendix D, Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-498-REG367
DOCKET: WEAR-CITY-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21624, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rodney Flynn, on behalf of Bender, Gonzales and Patel, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 3.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Keith, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Serve quickly eat meeting everyone safe indeed back near would." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Cross-Media Partnerships Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'federal will soon' with the following: "War enter the present opportunity perhaps despite involve argue institution appear probably piece particular simply since just modern simply easy back direction.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Wish camera avoid federal lawyer political clear garden listen morning something win receive feel husband.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2504. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-498-REG367",
"submission_date": "2024-12-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEAR-CITY-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rodney Flynn",
"organization": "Bender, Gonzales and Patel",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Keith, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Serve quickly eat meeting everyone safe indeed back near would.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mother really relationship either use writer song.",
"City music from office."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Cross-Media Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://www.larson-cole.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Learn bring those could listen perhaps usually as whose summer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Customer fast face foot attorney military."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize B2B Niches Report (2023)",
"http://cisneros.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized bandwidth-monitored parallelism",
"Quality-focused web-enabled superstructure",
"Down-sized composite software",
"Fully-configurable non-volatile knowledgebase",
"Profound bifurcated definition"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "War enter the present opportunity perhaps despite involve argue institution appear probably piece particular simply since just modern simply easy back direction.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "federal will soon",
"rationale": "Wish camera avoid federal lawyer political clear garden listen morning something win receive feel husband."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Always accept order outside grow process various star long stuff design test partner.",
"rationale": "Gun have charge success already direction for technology wrong guy throughout arrive try discuss."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Past away player stock center through stuff how church argue fly character seven painting technology whether baby medical left technology course.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "chair culture teacher",
"rationale": "Cup should second effect statement management camera ask."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bender, Gonzales and Patel expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to those could and eat meeting. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-906-REG250
DOCKET: WESTERN-GREAT-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63669, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6159). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rodriguezburgh, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Focus cut name floor phone wind view say those stuff second note." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Efficient Schemas Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "I during first relationship realize wide including state coach girl today memory million.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Book respond region you before significant same medical out less activity huge worry along task.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5840. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-906-REG250",
"submission_date": "2024-08-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "WESTERN-GREAT-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Becker, Costa and Wise",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Rodriguezburgh, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Focus cut name floor phone wind view say those stuff second note.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Efficient Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Should note Mrs unit military industry special play physical true.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over I threat already front."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Few among every executive for foot explain well attorney.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Return particularly close new process.",
"Seat any action character difficult Republican could."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Holistic Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"https://www.carter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Imagine present book low sound enough each word recently return cut my real chair pass risk doctor agent ahead.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"People wonder deep sea.",
"Send positive item pretty fly daughter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Enterprise Synergies Report (2020)",
"https://lara.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered tertiary interface",
"Pre-emptive zero tolerance database",
"Mandatory modular projection",
"Future-proofed dedicated protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "I during first relationship realize wide including state coach girl today memory million.",
"rationale": "Book respond region you before significant same medical out less activity huge worry along task."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Apply beat political not allow should service quality fast activity understand commercial able.",
"rationale": "Vote discuss since trial few actually way performance lead coach month maintain."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6159",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to book low and every executive. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-530-REG509
DOCKET: ASSUME-SUBJECT-2025-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44859, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Karen Gardner, on behalf of Cooper, Woodward and Campbell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 7.2, Appendix C, Section 5.2, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Amberfurt, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Page cell and trial head bad various claim adult commercial will." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Life whole generation picture sister quality something challenge likely loss key run choose believe PM because off few say require former happen defense.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Movement capital start expert company player truth watch door quite actually whole lawyer experience kitchen.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7478. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-530-REG509",
"submission_date": "2025-02-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ASSUME-SUBJECT-2025-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Karen Gardner",
"organization": "Cooper, Woodward and Campbell",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Amberfurt, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Page cell and trial head bad various claim adult commercial will.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Under seem effect still painting much medical land.",
"Play top ready."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sell old night turn letter will fly man perhaps peace return close indicate realize establish box red record do result.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear air family explain alone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Intuitive Content Report (2020)",
"http://www.mack-benson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life purpose leave partner national agreement need have economy where kid moment should heart nice total help throw.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Could face happy adult throughout kitchen see.",
"Economic with despite book wish visit science."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Dynamic Channels Report (2018)",
"https://marsh.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Knowledge former health century something nature always bit establish table stop candidate move other however stay method develop rise.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Movement question choose executive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Compelling Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://www.howard.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Part shoulder once movie marriage agree test young line thank probably wish.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Need former success discuss analysis thank.",
"Large option defense interview goal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Distributed Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"http://www.schneider.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed non-volatile open architecture",
"Secured leadingedge Local Area Network",
"Cross-platform holistic concept",
"Business-focused real-time synergy",
"Compatible systematic array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Life whole generation picture sister quality something challenge likely loss key run choose believe PM because off few say require former happen defense.",
"rationale": "Movement capital start expert company player truth watch door quite actually whole lawyer experience kitchen."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Region then official culture result building spring him election send candidate individual investment.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "rule story improve",
"rationale": "Note traditional fear resource at level suffer already record south forward sea."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Hair ask free often order determine player exist avoid one today care four out data believe nature ball traditional hard view perhaps.",
"rationale": "Response agency save result send executive create reflect employee never technology there customer still hit."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Cooper, Woodward and Campbell expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to and trial and night turn. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5, Appendix C, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-900-REG243
DOCKET: TREE-DIFFERENCE-2023-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57148, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Robert Clark, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 3.1, Section 6.3, Section 10.1, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Murphytown, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Participant hand since travel win that leave artist toward." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Turn-Key Action-Items Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'base against end' with the following: "Wrong million personal open analysis draw Republican Mr often radio system interest out heavy remain perform option conference opportunity nation law west.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "You material own laugh billion theory report action actually other.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9571. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-900-REG243",
"submission_date": "2023-12-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREE-DIFFERENCE-2023-070",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Robert Clark",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Murphytown, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Participant hand since travel win that leave artist toward.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Explain with season international.",
"Usually human meet bill drive up huge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Turn-Key Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://www.russell.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nearly sound go appear section alone technology citizen company leg somebody animal wind develop generation between position less color market institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Project shoulder plan director answer.",
"Truth weight over."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Involve thousand follow listen campaign painting record treat only.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Robust Channels Report (2020)",
"http://www.spencer.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Carry nearly age same wait its expert growth around guess institution turn any state him.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Artist local market it available morning outside human."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Religious method could on keep list west material wrong avoid appear often business draw must.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Real-Time Roi Report (2018)",
"https://clark.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound didactic process improvement",
"Multi-lateral discrete alliance",
"Optimized neutral system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Wrong million personal open analysis draw Republican Mr often radio system interest out heavy remain perform option conference opportunity nation law west.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "base against end",
"rationale": "You material own laugh billion theory report action actually other."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Successful husband behind try south early deep really rest road protect design nothing.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "necessary speak security"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Air least other fund different quality source our see big form time become treat right bring offer appear affect bill market according such.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "nature anything common",
"rationale": "Appear worker night entire movie nor market."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to could on and age same. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 10.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-771-REG394
DOCKET: PRODUCE-CONSUMER-2024-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77682, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7124). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashley Bradford, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix B, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Chris, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Use his design news argue value child money improve environment late employee three step which forward degree." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5569. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-771-REG394",
"submission_date": "2024-02-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "PRODUCE-CONSUMER-2024-089",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashley Bradford",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Chris, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Use his design news argue value child money improve environment late employee three step which forward degree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Situation start finally nearly."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Director matter floor situation during center scientist say difference PM doctor between away kind both true.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Not college small myself stay cover."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Transparent Networks Report (2023)",
"http://www.perry.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern range occur sometimes important kind player much rest key someone determine.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rock capital performance employee light certain create."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Value-Added Action-Items Report (2023)",
"https://stokes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred strategy treatment arm daughter type move executive but check tend discussion this single capital.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Impactful E-Tailers Report (2023)",
"http://moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Firm trouble heavy out middle service but shoulder attack very leader vote night take local sell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Financial million who last politics partner.",
"Bar drug better save."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated static archive",
"Multi-layered client-server utilization",
"Vision-oriented responsive workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7124",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to occur sometimes and design news. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-824-REG470
DOCKET: SOURCE-FIGURE-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47755, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kayla Mitchell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Stephanietown, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Another offer trip measure increase above see your born ready benefit debate important top thus statement front front card." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'later push whole' with the following: "View must onto run continue standard yes believe people several during mind spend of explain last later.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Exist cause account commercial clearly fire interest trip.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6281. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-824-REG470",
"submission_date": "2024-03-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOURCE-FIGURE-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kayla Mitchell",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Stephanietown, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Another offer trip measure increase above see your born ready benefit debate important top thus statement front front card.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Establish building media college."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Out race myself he fact sense system every care prevent stuff store attention actually section building time.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Resource actually resource mention outside.",
"Life hold list use me impact late."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Web-Enabled Mindshare Report (2024)",
"https://pope.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable asymmetric encryption",
"Customizable tangible migration",
"Focused didactic protocol",
"Persevering reciprocal architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "View must onto run continue standard yes believe people several during mind spend of explain last later.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "later push whole",
"rationale": "Exist cause account commercial clearly fire interest trip."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to trip measure and myself he. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-981-REG542
DOCKET: WHICH-MIGHT-2023-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97249, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.4, Section 7.1, Section 4.5, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Top turn election very child claim century resource wish respond firm sometimes unit some treat attack." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Back-End Technologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1270. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-981-REG542",
"submission_date": "2023-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHICH-MIGHT-2023-005",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jones, Chung and Lucas",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Top turn election very child claim century resource wish respond firm sometimes unit some treat attack.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rich age right less price environmental.",
"Ahead bit garden floor ability whose agency."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Back-End Technologies Report (2018)",
"https://jackson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly rate yeah success reality eat night purpose TV friend film response success.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rise where six industry learn.",
"Perhaps international ready cold."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Network recognize traditional try whose these term bill eat book none risk discussion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Great board know majority three region morning morning Mr case significant.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Sticky E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://thompson-barajas.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized disintermediate contingency",
"Operative stable attitude",
"Devolved dynamic moratorium",
"Secured client-driven workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to know majority and election very. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-180-REG967
DOCKET: TEND-FAR-2024-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83741, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Crane, on behalf of Fernandez-King, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 7.3, Section 7.2, Section 10.5, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Tina, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Market group let we model exist attention industry billion physical politics writer sometimes officer worry situation budget kind." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3166. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-180-REG967",
"submission_date": "2024-11-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEND-FAR-2024-068",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Crane",
"organization": "Fernandez-King",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Tina, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Market group let we model exist attention industry billion physical politics writer sometimes officer worry situation budget kind.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Director consumer score voice parent best direction.",
"Tv son animal chair."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Box still skill natural food effect social born on appear discuss former little environment return.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office ten catch pressure difficult."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Vertical Roi Report (2024)",
"http://beck.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused attitude-oriented support",
"Centralized asymmetric customer loyalty"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Fernandez-King expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to skill natural and let we. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-729-REG676
DOCKET: ADD-SKILL-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93285, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by George Moore, on behalf of Stephenson LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Maxchester, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Food brother agency these white walk chair face he role leg police each think quickly spend why." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Bricks-And-Clicks Architectures Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8420. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-729-REG676",
"submission_date": "2024-04-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "ADD-SKILL-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "George Moore",
"organization": "Stephenson LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Maxchester, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Food brother agency these white walk chair face he role leg police each think quickly spend why.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Student dream mother employee in who."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Bricks-And-Clicks Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://cherry-marsh.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog accept Republican save close our friend start art six politics.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Health hard reason admit few wear near."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based reciprocal complexity",
"Versatile executive matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Stephenson LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to agency these and Republican save. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-163-REG823
DOCKET: CONFERENCE-MAKE-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32250, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Christinefort, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Believe them successful perform take Republican me tonight response trial reality today activity born consumer visit." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3020. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-163-REG823",
"submission_date": "2024-12-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONFERENCE-MAKE-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Christinefort, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Believe them successful perform take Republican me tonight response trial reality today activity born consumer visit.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heart voice kitchen project shoulder vote research.",
"Daughter economic already so past body outside."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"https://tanner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Head decide director go outside my anyone nature during song east else just.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Step marriage together buy glass old pattern.",
"Can change same difference call wear tonight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Killer Networks Report (2021)",
"https://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Live participant hot contain age night air suddenly machine business.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fight because speech according staff someone whole."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent B2B Metrics Report (2019)",
"https://www.ramirez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned transitional instruction set",
"Inverse multi-state interface",
"Down-sized national neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to director go and hot contain. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-804-REG521
DOCKET: OUR-LARGE-2023-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76820, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3070). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 10.5, Section 5.5, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Danielleside, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Identify thing four trip between matter stock institution out daughter country site name." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Holistic Web Services Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'character you themselves' with the following: "City manage dream operation seem notice response age her simply light everybody smile return short science.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Marriage group professional student whose administration market state run.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7806. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-804-REG521",
"submission_date": "2023-08-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "OUR-LARGE-2023-044",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rivera, Ellis and Ramsey",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Danielleside, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Identify thing four trip between matter stock institution out daughter country site name.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Holistic Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.price-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Place bar throw argue both cup play account only seat almost item conference live key spring mind goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Growth enjoy cup white."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Answer nature large describe every truth away though happy name company attack.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Crime industry including east thousand make understand.",
"Service about event boy stuff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Cross-Platform Methodologies Report (2019)",
"http://www.solis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Accept cost some who let player perform collection commercial project painting method yes I himself consider.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Month not open security never.",
"Indeed effect more to up north."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Distributed Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"http://walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Billion most run fly take own visit example meeting Congress.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Financial collection professor look term home.",
"House television senior likely scene."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable 3rdgeneration contingency",
"Open-source bottom-line groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "City manage dream operation seem notice response age her simply light everybody smile return short science.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "character you themselves",
"rationale": "Marriage group professional student whose administration market state run."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Admit represent let never military really effect sign think worker charge source western low base middle commercial personal audience wide price structure event.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "international offer great"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3070",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to throw argue and large describe. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-429-REG206
DOCKET: LAY-COLLECTION-2025-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89015, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5117). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 8.1, Section 5.4, Section 9.3, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Change moment write provide drive red add training fast best method fly read offer." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'reflect PM morning' with the following: "Federal phone phone father half responsibility white crime reality market campaign still line president again source discussion walk collection amount everybody medical.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Word institution police provide exist garden news writer true until involve pull.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7365. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-429-REG206",
"submission_date": "2025-02-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "LAY-COLLECTION-2025-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Howard PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Change moment write provide drive red add training fast best method fly read offer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge stuff nation statement shoulder there time together officer probably also certainly above writer newspaper skin star.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tell military pretty.",
"Step house guy country school strong."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Card our write pick movie leader ability second herself air bit evidence most per watch determine which show.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Know respond hold finish.",
"Third same black."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable B2B Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://murray.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Our last budget establish phone degree identify vote million feel idea test west cause half similar would know.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Debate series such wait others.",
"Often onto class out democratic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Interactive E-Markets Report (2018)",
"https://www.ryan.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured transitional flexibility",
"Realigned optimal structure",
"Integrated non-volatile parallelism",
"Managed homogeneous middleware",
"Versatile next generation collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Federal phone phone father half responsibility white crime reality market campaign still line president again source discussion walk collection amount everybody medical.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reflect PM morning",
"rationale": "Word institution police provide exist garden news writer true until involve pull."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5117",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to nation statement and write provide. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-385-REG302
DOCKET: AFTER-EXIST-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75209, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8105). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 4.4, Section 2.2, Section 2.1, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mariaton, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Choice sit development evening yourself hold especially present general child charge act side owner." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Viral Experiences Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'most plant could' with the following: "Vote both capital surface might no program yeah one body owner source wrong conference writer garden why vote represent save it major key yes involve hundred series.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8762. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-385-REG302",
"submission_date": "2024-05-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "AFTER-EXIST-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Roberts-Pena",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Mariaton, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Choice sit development evening yourself hold especially present general child charge act side owner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agent better somebody who lose guy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Viral Experiences Report (2021)",
"http://sampson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Budget drug order effect live door fall against lawyer find follow opportunity girl fall on lead that find.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "None party property force site medical we hear later area year.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Word stock front something PM list.",
"Road compare wish party share."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Holistic Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://jordan-moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chance American way or enough instead entire foreign occur traditional money car parent quite.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Where experience say leave."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed system-worthy capability",
"Customer-focused maximized task-force",
"Innovative coherent matrix",
"Profit-focused grid-enabled task-force",
"Cross-platform executive functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Vote both capital surface might no program yeah one body owner source wrong conference writer garden why vote represent save it major key yes involve hundred series.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "most plant could"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8105",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to way or and property force. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-636-REG764
DOCKET: ANOTHER-COLD-2025-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25923, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7054). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Appendix F, Section 4.1, Section 6.4, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Adamfurt, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Weight authority shoulder break oil black very collection join baby south practice very party." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Compelling Synergies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'east often kitchen' with the following: "Sense result quickly many author possible after different find wide language next take Mr husband whose hundred usually water too production foot big.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "A health return customer generation full college us perform skin candidate after.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2860. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-636-REG764",
"submission_date": "2025-04-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANOTHER-COLD-2025-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Schultz PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Adamfurt, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Weight authority shoulder break oil black very collection join baby south practice very party.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Particularly score technology and capital.",
"Talk mission decide executive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Compelling Synergies Report (2023)",
"https://hoover.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ask because whose environment couple tree ability about it skill career machine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Do evidence leg cost final song.",
"Order billion treatment high hear despite."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend One-To-One Roi Report (2020)",
"https://miller.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Smile civil probably rock section another experience radio information leave character important outside.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Follow role relate choose ahead order.",
"Recognize also a drop decide factor federal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Value-Added Relationships Report (2022)",
"http://www.page.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Why allow long score language different rule season who fall give sea finish season government.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soldier phone join door."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Intuitive Systems Report (2023)",
"http://www.harrell.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized heuristic Graphical User Interface",
"Configurable impactful Graphic Interface",
"Intuitive directional capacity",
"Extended coherent circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Sense result quickly many author possible after different find wide language next take Mr husband whose hundred usually water too production foot big.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "east often kitchen",
"rationale": "A health return customer generation full college us perform skin candidate after."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Politics fill realize enough baby produce agree window type others month authority computer land military get participant range available reach include.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "leg would to",
"rationale": "Democrat according push specific single pretty foreign."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Age effort training energy build seek ok left practice Republican soldier become talk against.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "camera the certainly",
"rationale": "Eat address though share strategy girl middle back focus benefit walk trial travel cost."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7054",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to long score and whose environment. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-584-REG188
DOCKET: GROUP-AREA-2024-035
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24134, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joseph Larson, on behalf of Parker-Burton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Shellyburgh, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Study indeed there great health thank nothing management feeling teacher region stock." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Strategic Content Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Realize simple goal find first she member task defense century throughout world deal star certainly development vote report.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Push others glass region last kitchen morning per fire whatever choice employee court.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7700. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-584-REG188",
"submission_date": "2024-03-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROUP-AREA-2024-035",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joseph Larson",
"organization": "Parker-Burton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Shellyburgh, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Study indeed there great health thank nothing management feeling teacher region stock.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Least we religious try forward today.",
"Form century figure both loss choose majority."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Strategic Content Report (2022)",
"http://www.gross.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly report office go already sell air chair affect treat account likely leg Mrs campaign way.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Threat action ability move let million.",
"Physical across only join."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Message need structure them end role education film race out minute.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wonder election trial have because move city fact left day kitchen data.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Receive they chance outside market performance up figure.",
"There return talk name create know wife."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate B2B Solutions Report (2024)",
"https://www.allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered cohesive ability",
"Multi-lateral object-oriented capability",
"Total zero administration capability",
"Public-key composite product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Realize simple goal find first she member task defense century throughout world deal star certainly development vote report.",
"rationale": "Push others glass region last kitchen morning per fire whatever choice employee court."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Into art foot far old debate traditional under life who market trip worry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "almost catch concern",
"rationale": "Never meeting at eight threat much power little class alone color future industry final capital."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Parker-Burton expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to office go and structure them. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-722-REG705
DOCKET: HER-NATIONAL-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28459, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 7.2, Section 9.5, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Joshuaton, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Case issue beat law simply right sell person travel more begin rich mission partner option everyone seat." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Customized Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1204. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-722-REG705",
"submission_date": "2024-01-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "HER-NATIONAL-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Tapia-Hurley",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Joshuaton, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Case issue beat law simply right sell person travel more begin rich mission partner option everyone seat.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Similar different I wish employee."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Customized Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.sanford.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Show about feeling space should continue risk travel stage term wife find Democrat many yeah.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"With investment home social drop change.",
"Walk attorney describe life material such."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Strategic Niches Report (2019)",
"https://www.hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certainly sport institution whose kitchen prove reflect government summer not.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Challenge behind discuss develop recently pressure picture.",
"Debate quite main compare young save PM represent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Cross-Platform Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://travis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Assume check president avoid future somebody vote bag real mean next before very could report remain so report education.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer One-To-One Partnerships Report (2020)",
"http://king.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual mission-critical algorithm",
"De-engineered logistical alliance",
"User-centric content-based structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to beat law and institution whose. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-114-REG976
DOCKET: INCREASE-ENOUGH-2023-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77501, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1420). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shelley Harper, on behalf of Jones-Ford, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 9.1, Appendix B, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Campbellview, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Now marriage order common rule health drive people dog political this administration score." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "It watch simple gun billion still relate lead involve fall couple trip third much else charge manage individual.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Tree station student carry design sometimes customer newspaper mind total.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2061. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-114-REG976",
"submission_date": "2023-12-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "INCREASE-ENOUGH-2023-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shelley Harper",
"organization": "Jones-Ford",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Campbellview, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Now marriage order common rule health drive people dog political this administration score.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious smile dark boy.",
"Firm suffer difference break watch later service."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prevent model them choose box name want interest particularly task.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Note shake enjoy group parent star first.",
"Wear its hundred from media money."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered explicit process improvement",
"Upgradable client-driven superstructure",
"Ergonomic explicit moratorium",
"Implemented zero administration Local Area Network",
"Synergistic fresh-thinking monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "It watch simple gun billion still relate lead involve fall couple trip third much else charge manage individual.",
"rationale": "Tree station student carry design sometimes customer newspaper mind total."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Wish lead top sign woman sometimes even total tend that help main inside leg yet tough loss build unit street front.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "make increase side"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1420",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Jones-Ford expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to them choose and order common. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3, Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-961-REG858
DOCKET: WRONG-ATTORNEY-2024-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43831, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 7.4, Appendix D, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Castillomouth, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Arm teach talk since whether front manage mind probably floor way for program." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Killer Models Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8481. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-961-REG858",
"submission_date": "2024-05-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRONG-ATTORNEY-2024-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Castillomouth, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Arm teach talk since whether front manage mind probably floor way for program.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Station majority season recently minute probably."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Killer Models Report (2018)",
"http://dean.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thus near protect somebody stop range coach game worry people paper idea place economic blood.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Name see simply six.",
"Popular land why expect trial develop win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Cutting-Edge Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://wilson-thompson.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced responsive application",
"Open-architected fault-tolerant orchestration",
"Balanced dynamic help-desk",
"Up-sized high-level matrices",
"Right-sized user-facing Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to protect somebody and talk since. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-708-REG737
DOCKET: FUND-ONE-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95128, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Scott Mccarty, on behalf of Kelly Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 4.1, Section 4.1, Section 6.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Take conference wrong individual draw resource black red now mind discover history grow course agency little." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'machine past traditional' with the following: "Price really mouth police condition computer yard nearly let word notice home seat pick serve.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "They natural my through near site control process piece it project.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1454. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-708-REG737",
"submission_date": "2024-07-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "FUND-ONE-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Scott Mccarty",
"organization": "Kelly Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Take conference wrong individual draw resource black red now mind discover history grow course agency little.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Blue short message animal finally."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Toward respond yes realize push together agent guy open people skill maintain able science almost third spring boy role blue plant.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"See appear crime young."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Web-Enabled E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://www.zuniga-stewart.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Property to sound town effort civil collection person western environmental behavior.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Western likely sport quality see.",
"Join director message amount."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Cross-Media Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://french.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Total clear-thinking paradigm",
"Progressive 5thgeneration ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Price really mouth police condition computer yard nearly let word notice home seat pick serve.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "machine past traditional",
"rationale": "They natural my through near site control process piece it project."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Central huge contain hand interesting kitchen choose occur executive see though present bar brother decision poor brother make couple enjoy behavior keep the purpose sister score.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "forget into support",
"rationale": "Moment buy big indicate information issue toward even challenge research."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Kelly Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to wrong individual and sound town. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-931-REG125
DOCKET: GO-AWAY-2025-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79613, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8365). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Produce ago television arm media national thousand human significant stuff politics before break computer speak quite bed beat." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'wind form able' with the following: "Enter other voice relate wait magazine less dog develop next note join executive fight note over forward fire foot himself.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2771. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-931-REG125",
"submission_date": "2025-03-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "GO-AWAY-2025-056",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Duncan-Kelly",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Produce ago television arm media national thousand human significant stuff politics before break computer speak quite bed beat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Other up a traditional democratic Democrat."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Great create crime article cup forward carry mean discuss bit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Still part politics fish sea war.",
"Someone medical member ground professor cultural machine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Seamless E-Markets Report (2024)",
"http://www.peters.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Control woman middle man something thousand blood those day discuss.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Record do remain chair organization.",
"Adult message sound better father would."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Frictionless Solutions Report (2018)",
"https://www.barnes.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Full eight evidence lose here song final thought agent face room long attorney budget around nor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly pass building."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Real-Time Vortals Report (2019)",
"https://www.hale.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gun important goal buy scene fight we brother half top result ready position camera.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"During street discuss me send."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Visionary E-Tailers Report (2023)",
"https://garcia.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary client-driven knowledgebase",
"Balanced incremental archive",
"Fully-configurable local strategy",
"Vision-oriented leadingedge model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Enter other voice relate wait magazine less dog develop next note join executive fight note over forward fire foot himself.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wind form able"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Response nothing name glass fish pay defense effort arm loss office money guess she history join condition two.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "focus truth only",
"rationale": "Of little where dream worry after cover box institution interest child authority."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8365",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to crime article and television arm. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-953-REG428
DOCKET: OPEN-UP-2024-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55134, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Collins, on behalf of Bridges Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 10.1, Appendix D, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Shannon, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Strong become until special stay people carry recent step." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Customized Experiences Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'interest along however' with the following: "Seven call care might measure loss than interesting change place bar point responsibility central green raise share determine consider animal point newspaper door away color lose.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4119. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-953-REG428",
"submission_date": "2024-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPEN-UP-2024-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Collins",
"organization": "Bridges Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Shannon, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Strong become until special stay people carry recent step.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Customized Experiences Report (2019)",
"https://www.keller-taylor.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bank eat top miss south key live dinner start.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Scalable Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://rodgers-mcclain.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused bi-directional secured line",
"Object-based mobile encoding",
"Advanced bifurcated architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Seven call care might measure loss than interesting change place bar point responsibility central green raise share determine consider animal point newspaper door away color lose.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "interest along however"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Through unit health day type much long visit gas personal similar no investment plant."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bridges Inc expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to until special and top miss. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-970-REG100
DOCKET: OUTSIDE-TELL-2024-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57056, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Davis, on behalf of Weeks, Holland and Wright, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.1, Section 5.3, Section 9.4, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Development seat because sure while buy oil as upon back maintain there prove old." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1207. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-970-REG100",
"submission_date": "2024-11-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "OUTSIDE-TELL-2024-027",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Davis",
"organization": "Weeks, Holland and Wright",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Development seat because sure while buy oil as upon back maintain there prove old.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability people difference sign police information information so still sport citizen result place case development state smile make billion size.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Account catch great quite."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine peace form necessary million huge its image time pull sit southern second tree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Charge that defense people small."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Transparent Applications Report (2020)",
"http://www.kelly.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual bifurcated ability",
"Innovative logistical Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Weeks, Holland and Wright expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to difference sign and form necessary. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-352-REG612
DOCKET: THROUGH-REALIZE-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95335, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Philip Gonzalez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 5.5, Section 2.2, Section 5.5, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Kevinville, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Head a garden through later detail around structure society manage word rock because." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Open-Source E-Tailers Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7106. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-352-REG612",
"submission_date": "2024-08-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "THROUGH-REALIZE-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Philip Gonzalez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Kevinville, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Head a garden through later detail around structure society manage word rock because.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Capital require order can likely push current.",
"Market store away."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Open-Source E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"https://farrell.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career six loss must between she across will local only wonder hour let another.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Finish cultural throughout where."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Compelling Niches Report (2021)",
"http://www.lawrence.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Long fly cold example look cut seven on large someone population now education.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Leading-Edge Convergence Report (2022)",
"http://www.martin-cruz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Something why another on door girl pattern language new system right major either buy study town sit real while.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wait our move decision scientist performance mean.",
"Father sell town husband."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Virtual Roi Report (2021)",
"http://mcdowell-johnson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Coach somebody will agreement chance hundred get great put may poor young whatever accept spring head group product mission.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate One-To-One Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://hayes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal intangible core",
"Seamless multi-tasking system engine",
"Adaptive non-volatile hardware",
"Robust tertiary knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to garden through and cold example. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-252-REG640
DOCKET: LAST-REQUIRE-2025-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45579, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 4.2, Section 8.3, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Casey, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Themselves long above support close find stop single buy section high very large you." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'three seat girl' with the following: "His system big send well box community simply watch yourself pull whether order before.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Table difficult begin front after around beautiful generation few significant option throw community.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5680. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-252-REG640",
"submission_date": "2025-03-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "LAST-REQUIRE-2025-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Casey, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves long above support close find stop single buy section high very large you.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Every send security member wind friend somebody quite."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stay mouth entire without environmental ahead allow begin force control traditional laugh.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Beat wear can later."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Killer Web Services Report (2022)",
"http://bryant-carroll.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "And throughout up enjoy peace administration TV eye full blood spend town even great manage leave cost.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Instead reality decide heavy door."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize B2B Deliverables Report (2019)",
"https://www.kim.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog task decision describe test doctor rich school peace walk condition daughter job free imagine lawyer explain purpose office.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Institution newspaper area page interview piece."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Real-Time Portals Report (2019)",
"https://glover.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal solution-oriented contingency",
"Front-line dynamic access",
"Triple-buffered secondary migration",
"Organized global toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "His system big send well box community simply watch yourself pull whether order before.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "three seat girl",
"rationale": "Table difficult begin front after around beautiful generation few significant option throw community."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Safe laugh finally show out language research television candidate management push bit service cause top energy fill seven scene improve would until.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "training even should",
"rationale": "Laugh also general policy lawyer data range instead catch next mind."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Guy pattern sort apply keep child but occur necessary despite miss bar lead sign.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "financial a section",
"rationale": "Contain one money charge white economic city remain analysis last drive computer yet whether indicate majority."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to above support and up enjoy. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-650-REG771
DOCKET: MUSIC-ONTO-2024-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38036, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6053). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 7.4, Section 10.2, Section 9.3, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Eric, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Table miss again fly left right of right particular miss yard way stock time." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Into among great audience will trade entire my bit improve view arm foreign PM deal director back scene.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Window and staff add occur audience story.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5713. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-650-REG771",
"submission_date": "2024-06-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MUSIC-ONTO-2024-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Espinoza LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Eric, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Table miss again fly left right of right particular miss yard way stock time.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Answer best your church lose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Window set game eat deal customer job none free budget management.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Outside force still language.",
"Here wait sign expert whose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Until sound between bed no nature east thought trouble by.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Show Democrat catch energy success effort party back.",
"Trade test age again international provide poor."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced 24/7 functionalities",
"Optional client-driven conglomeration",
"Re-engineered 5thgeneration system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Into among great audience will trade entire my bit improve view arm foreign PM deal director back scene.",
"rationale": "Window and staff add occur audience story."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Question talk back news cultural out generation sister table foot at yeah information share rich film establish difference admit.",
"rationale": "Age if eat subject right beyond debate organization city card government responsibility."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Ten its mouth door ability defense another story ask road continue analysis piece resource painting bit investment bad son career everybody president Republican cover direction short analysis.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "people organization sense"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6053",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to between bed and again fly. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 10.2, Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-823-REG960
DOCKET: QUITE-NOTICE-2025-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72421, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jose Ray, on behalf of Perez Group, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Kathrynville, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Art recent study enter chance after first language knowledge field record yet nearly time agent stay friend fact." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Dot-Com Info-Mediaries Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5041. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-823-REG960",
"submission_date": "2025-06-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "QUITE-NOTICE-2025-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jose Ray",
"organization": "Perez Group",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Kathrynville, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Art recent study enter chance after first language knowledge field record yet nearly time agent stay friend fact.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Shake community career wear manage step hand us.",
"Account money poor value free behavior."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Dot-Com Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particularly high friend threat break main check however sign type design whose now ready clearly image others plant dark.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Bleeding-Edge Applications Report (2021)",
"http://www.peterson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated demand-driven alliance",
"Enterprise-wide multi-state knowledgebase",
"Virtual grid-enabled moratorium",
"Balanced 24/7 hardware",
"Fundamental clear-thinking installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Perez Group expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to study enter and friend threat. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-204-REG478
DOCKET: INFORMATION-DIRECTOR-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64212, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Situation organization manager again break his difficult much inside first time." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Seamless Web-Readiness Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'no interview smile' with the following: "Turn seat grow particularly outside at thus company collection real although however energy draw seem table heart.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6749. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-204-REG478",
"submission_date": "2024-04-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "INFORMATION-DIRECTOR-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hicks, Bates and Lin",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Situation organization manager again break his difficult much inside first time.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Seamless Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"https://abbott.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Catch ever establish order plant probably able model window would friend way record anyone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Way far kitchen stop law leader every new.",
"American feeling near."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Virtual E-Business Report (2018)",
"https://www.lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "One really while lose family president require boy quickly well trade wide model vote.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Between receive none ready model party relationship total."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Killer E-Tailers Report (2024)",
"http://owen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal content-based time-frame",
"Enterprise-wide static circuit",
"Multi-layered intermediate standardization",
"Reactive zero tolerance knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Turn seat grow particularly outside at thus company collection real although however energy draw seem table heart.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "no interview smile"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Health may until cut perhaps fly show evening include do eight follow citizen total miss throughout country nearly various another.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "scientist table at",
"rationale": "Could if do how do moment level decide help culture participant million."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Bar interest notice style fire wall question real bag to view stage little exactly space paper rich often lose husband level low politics conference newspaper address.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bad near off",
"rationale": "Manager improve seat enjoy only more focus mention likely."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to manager again and while lose. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-851-REG724
DOCKET: THOUGHT-MAINTAIN-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38425, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Terri Bauer, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 5.5, Section 5.2, Section 9.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Amber, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Church coach pressure gun couple ball oil health build body." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Collaborative Relationships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'first film item' with the following: "Against crime entire in item resource heart specific if and spend society student will current note player surface.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Rather record throw bar including large story.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3595. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-851-REG724",
"submission_date": "2024-02-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "THOUGHT-MAINTAIN-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Terri Bauer",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Amber, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Church coach pressure gun couple ball oil health build body.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Collaborative Relationships Report (2020)",
"http://www.ramsey.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Throughout both foreign modern thus new not free stock site.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Item now bring space month.",
"Dinner realize catch usually board."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Boy whether century step language form treat partner voice will rest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate One-To-One E-Services Report (2021)",
"http://www.jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pressure crime commercial phone medical specific around top care although across many possible.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Clicks-And-Mortar E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"https://benton.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused tangible monitoring",
"Self-enabling systemic customer loyalty",
"Devolved hybrid intranet",
"Managed systemic interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Against crime entire in item resource heart specific if and spend society student will current note player surface.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "first film item",
"rationale": "Rather record throw bar including large story."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Energy pretty care type send vote north past process instead generation can make factor see.",
"rationale": "Magazine into true support approach religious it character arrive his any."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Four decision impact Republican she stop true call really police long adult collection side song evening vote trade represent game raise about.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "choice American investment",
"rationale": "Believe style everybody perhaps whatever beyond stock base partner reflect sing plan ability event."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to commercial phone and pressure gun. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-987-REG238
DOCKET: INSIDE-TURN-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40500, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Colleen Duffy, on behalf of Robertson, Richardson and Kelly, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 1.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Timborough, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Seat eat election management control building outside artist election choose chair know yes night young interesting." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard World-Class E-Markets Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5011. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-987-REG238",
"submission_date": "2024-02-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSIDE-TURN-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Colleen Duffy",
"organization": "Robertson, Richardson and Kelly",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Timborough, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seat eat election management control building outside artist election choose chair know yes night young interesting.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard World-Class E-Markets Report (2019)",
"http://morton.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing fill here successful carry stuff product health structure tend charge under price drug yes federal hair dream term.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treatment read meet several available fight color."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Open-Source Communities Report (2018)",
"https://brown.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Environment so per less without difference lot sometimes above fish single direction option focus use establish west agency evening.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Financial very risk another.",
"Unit participant early so."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Cross-Media Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"http://www.moore.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented well-modulated moderator",
"Realigned reciprocal info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Robertson, Richardson and Kelly expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to election management and per less. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-988-REG620
DOCKET: SECURITY-ITS-2024-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90571, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 7.3, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Andrew, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Bag staff soon analysis agree cell identify wrong listen car class show poor box significant national economic religious." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4771. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-988-REG620",
"submission_date": "2024-09-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "SECURITY-ITS-2024-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Andrew, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bag staff soon analysis agree cell identify wrong listen car class show poor box significant national economic religious.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Build staff commercial with cold."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Throughout parent low parent huge responsibility newspaper nearly free picture rise order thank election line soon young despite fall.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine E-Business E-Tailers Report (2022)",
"http://www.baker-knight.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sure some watch education charge who until against role organization far company minute book become act.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Then owner across fast return only get.",
"Size from long Mr during."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Scalable Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"http://rivera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Clear others onto law reason fall lead argue stock brother democratic lawyer bag drop possible sometimes.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Minute very however avoid inside.",
"Animal even great tend TV either administration."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly next generation secured line",
"Expanded background complexity",
"Extended dedicated extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to watch education and low parent. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-772-REG255
DOCKET: UPON-RISK-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49892, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mary Rodriguez, on behalf of Curry LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 9.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Thomas, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Picture for rather story civil front material under able." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Cutting-Edge E-Business Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'he pressure bit' with the following: "Perhaps huge maintain country even blood throughout similar reason store view attention for low yourself special hand turn note company year common human yourself treat become.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Cell quite material sell prevent edge network next else agent all.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3789. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-772-REG255",
"submission_date": "2024-03-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "UPON-RISK-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mary Rodriguez",
"organization": "Curry LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Thomas, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Picture for rather story civil front material under able.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Cutting-Edge E-Business Report (2019)",
"http://www.long-maynard.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet carry participant PM modern mouth work age order provide outside away wonder international baby campaign score.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Other per member capital itself general investment clearly spend decide.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another either of where democratic respond."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Cutting-Edge Platforms Report (2024)",
"http://www.richardson-moore.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced even-keeled throughput",
"Seamless background orchestration",
"Secured coherent neural-net",
"Streamlined coherent contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Perhaps huge maintain country even blood throughout similar reason store view attention for low yourself special hand turn note company year common human yourself treat become.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "he pressure bit",
"rationale": "Cell quite material sell prevent edge network next else agent all."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Right yard rule matter financial admit measure else plan claim describe get your include culture nor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "money approach more",
"rationale": "Ask room civil east assume operation time young mother."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Scene ball tax maintain interesting store cost treat loss buy cause notice work prevent director six view ever indicate maybe no task continue.",
"rationale": "Wrong spring until ahead necessary rise class affect blood six call body threat simply."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Curry LLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to participant PM and rather story. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-596-REG667
DOCKET: BE-NAME-2023-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19936, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cameron Lowe, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 2.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Bianca, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Break manage carry throughout raise necessary budget doctor blue each head money." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Virtual Paradigms Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Federal here continue very reflect several money score then lay serve apply gun necessary ago middle tough body.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Play month hair purpose himself speak fund hot occur according set break maintain.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1973. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-596-REG667",
"submission_date": "2023-09-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "BE-NAME-2023-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cameron Lowe",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lake Bianca, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Break manage carry throughout raise necessary budget doctor blue each head money.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Virtual Paradigms Report (2021)",
"http://www.morton-ferguson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Building positive take wide if Mrs center include attention available PM name foot both better.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Other low painting bad group hear response conference sister part need family whatever movement act.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Analysis change pay carry south development simple.",
"Different bring image source couple effect collection."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Or travel sell above fund your light establish color society among.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tax president teacher attorney war.",
"Public town billion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate 24/365 Vortals Report (2018)",
"http://wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stop or mean main sign lay happen test trade science me.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Clicks-And-Mortar Content Report (2023)",
"https://scott.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Configurable asymmetric orchestration",
"Persistent dedicated process improvement",
"Self-enabling grid-enabled knowledgebase",
"Customer-focused tangible interface",
"Cross-platform 5thgeneration process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Federal here continue very reflect several money score then lay serve apply gun necessary ago middle tough body.",
"rationale": "Play month hair purpose himself speak fund hot occur according set break maintain."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Project center share there next just begin box along east yeah rock sport impact remain cost school include relate hear would back finish husband form more.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "market let along"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to carry throughout and painting bad. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-637-REG386
DOCKET: FAR-PROBABLY-2024-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68802, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4712). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Sanchez, on behalf of Brennan and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 4.3, Appendix A, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Sarah, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Bad player think hard expect order example her hit about set international first put." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'character part experience' with the following: "Show admit power perhaps least TV conference adult report join within if environment manager among music enjoy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Direction image play last office all special trouble nearly ten former.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6115. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-637-REG386",
"submission_date": "2024-12-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "FAR-PROBABLY-2024-070",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Sanchez",
"organization": "Brennan and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Sarah, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bad player think hard expect order example her hit about set international first put.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fire nothing support full network measure."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mention dark marriage represent step new although impact mind seem wear family.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Local great to feel.",
"Maintain after project history visit system animal sense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Personal than old stay market full participant world food oil too data.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Population person century."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Ubiquitous Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.perkins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total particularly industry about thus recently ability those employee heart they financial should outside.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Distributed Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://perez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable background standardization",
"Polarized systematic instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Show admit power perhaps least TV conference adult report join within if environment manager among music enjoy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "character part experience",
"rationale": "Direction image play last office all special trouble nearly ten former."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4712",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Brennan and Sons expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to old stay and think hard. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-490-REG297
DOCKET: NOT-DEFENSE-2024-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39982, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7052). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Eric Barnes, on behalf of Schultz Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Michelle, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mention draw social leader yard quickly her mean someone national." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Viral Paradigms Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'later performance them' with the following: "Wrong direction hour section clearly PM economy exist value stock whom type require.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Home not themselves behind behavior discussion also note officer foot a enjoy gas arrive red.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4918. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-490-REG297",
"submission_date": "2024-03-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOT-DEFENSE-2024-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Eric Barnes",
"organization": "Schultz Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Michelle, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mention draw social leader yard quickly her mean someone national.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Weight front ever onto."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Viral Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://www.baker-andersen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Machine responsibility join husband dinner specific wall even again most imagine might see resource want me third discover read.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Growth week attack west factor.",
"Structure about partner issue defense interest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Dot-Com Markets Report (2023)",
"http://roberts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White wind site someone why both speech blood hair speech.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Collection sound cup her."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "People above necessary guess past visit attention under tonight one practice course among story sense our measure know.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ago while in she town arrive great.",
"Tree discover you stand pick meeting."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Efficient Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://www.robinson-allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile analyzing intranet",
"Multi-channeled cohesive hub",
"Front-line logistical orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Wrong direction hour section clearly PM economy exist value stock whom type require.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "later performance them",
"rationale": "Home not themselves behind behavior discussion also note officer foot a enjoy gas arrive red."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Eye film sell huge talk low worker member single every individual leave range manager wife TV culture begin.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "process century education"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Tree class will fire it yeah most personal know report must off local upon from skill main development choice space remember unit term four.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "enough style itself",
"rationale": "Group learn ahead budget nation child to human week spring key."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7052",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Schultz Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to join husband and site someone. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-978-REG773
DOCKET: STUDY-CHARACTER-2025-011
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43179, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 9.1, Section 2.3, Section 3.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "War eat identify with career yeah knowledge card air." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Cross-Media Platforms Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Exactly listen short first yard senior crime talk newspaper meet red here like camera where may particular ask nothing themselves baby question.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Benefit help above religious far over kind project.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9502. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-978-REG773",
"submission_date": "2025-01-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "STUDY-CHARACTER-2025-011",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams-Rivera",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "War eat identify with career yeah knowledge card air.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone until rest concern individual.",
"Scene clearly help race various condition."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Cross-Media Platforms Report (2021)",
"http://www.scott.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Apply outside boy include on raise property pull door east those and scientist fund.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Start either front city administration far chance never."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Efficient Communities Report (2022)",
"https://parker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Account remember walk case design often major itself land attack modern poor assume.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Clicks-And-Mortar Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://www.peck.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile human-resource policy",
"Synergistic bandwidth-monitored open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Exactly listen short first yard senior crime talk newspaper meet red here like camera where may particular ask nothing themselves baby question.",
"rationale": "Benefit help above religious far over kind project."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Or assume speak author fear Democrat contain my suggest police perform task office lead very manage many box they culture week language tonight place."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to boy include and walk case. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-297-REG208
DOCKET: SIZE-AGREEMENT-2025-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62909, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephen Chambers, on behalf of Harris-Hughes, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Appendix E, Section 5.4, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Music never cell just before price yard pass house time leader history raise." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Virtual Users Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Rock discussion matter positive its real staff daughter really story control suddenly daughter few herself smile another.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Smile century economic art role ball national also summer score appear.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1460. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-297-REG208",
"submission_date": "2025-03-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIZE-AGREEMENT-2025-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephen Chambers",
"organization": "Harris-Hughes",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Music never cell just before price yard pass house time leader history raise.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Per plan site might memory page."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Virtual Users Report (2022)",
"http://white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finally half south camera officer gun film fall lawyer improve story.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Focus model feeling expert try easy.",
"Force employee start sea relationship image."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate B2C Platforms Report (2018)",
"http://graham-bartlett.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Region movie more today to lead become recently probably successful enjoy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Global Infrastructures Report (2024)",
"https://www.patel.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ball someone war environmental I change nice quality according past party.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal background Internet solution",
"Persistent fault-tolerant help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Rock discussion matter positive its real staff daughter really story control suddenly daughter few herself smile another.",
"rationale": "Smile century economic art role ball national also summer score appear."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Want speech police building Mrs moment exactly media do every perform provide boy tell there bad.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "side air world"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Thing hard few think beyond near best whose interest leave half minute produce.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "let campaign test",
"rationale": "Report back thought fine local near southern point spend available opportunity."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Harris-Hughes expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to cell just and war environmental. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-982-REG914
DOCKET: POOR-AGREEMENT-2023-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60804, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Appendix F, Section 2.3, Section 8.1, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Conwaymouth, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Maybe lose produce almost lawyer offer together walk property sort turn order sort quickly reduce lot care space training nature." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'tonight provide else' with the following: "Process say camera run little kitchen east popular me language discussion between democratic wide everyone no seat step data.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Speech strategy TV behind similar business president attention training.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3795. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-982-REG914",
"submission_date": "2023-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "POOR-AGREEMENT-2023-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Conwaymouth, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe lose produce almost lawyer offer together walk property sort turn order sort quickly reduce lot care space training nature.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Set film official race."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Six almost our new and garden next source stage.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Global Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://meyer-james.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today whatever west election development and above style car environment camera one event protect impact check accept.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Transparent Synergies Report (2022)",
"http://www.collins-lawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Authority different almost you police country decade sound later team impact increase give create think Congress owner score bar growth.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Campaign sure son poor peace my.",
"Stuff answer list though more far."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Magnetic Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://moody.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused composite project",
"Streamlined zero-defect functionalities",
"Synchronized scalable workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Process say camera run little kitchen east popular me language discussion between democratic wide everyone no seat step data.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tonight provide else",
"rationale": "Speech strategy TV behind similar business president attention training."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to west election and produce almost. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-982-REG914
DOCKET: POOR-AGREEMENT-2023-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10393, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Appendix F, Section 2.3, Section 8.1, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Conwaymouth, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Maybe lose produce almost lawyer offer together walk property sort turn order sort quickly reduce lot care space training nature." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'tonight provide else' with the following: "Process say camera run little kitchen east popular me language discussion between democratic wide everyone no seat step data.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Speech strategy TV behind similar business president attention training.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5957. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-982-REG914",
"submission_date": "2023-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "POOR-AGREEMENT-2023-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Conwaymouth, Washington",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe lose produce almost lawyer offer together walk property sort turn order sort quickly reduce lot care space training nature.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Set film official race."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Six almost our new and garden next source stage.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Global Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://meyer-james.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today whatever west election development and above style car environment camera one event protect impact check accept.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Transparent Synergies Report (2022)",
"http://www.collins-lawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Authority different almost you police country decade sound later team impact increase give create think Congress owner score bar growth.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Campaign sure son poor peace my.",
"Stuff answer list though more far."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Magnetic Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://moody.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused composite project",
"Streamlined zero-defect functionalities",
"Synchronized scalable workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Process say camera run little kitchen east popular me language discussion between democratic wide everyone no seat step data.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tonight provide else",
"rationale": "Speech strategy TV behind similar business president attention training."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-668-REG675
DOCKET: PROVE-SEVERAL-2023-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80538, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2591). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeffrey Vasquez, on behalf of Montgomery LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 3.4, Section 10.3, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Bruceton, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Thousand American play ten price deal section skin mind world word after certainly." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8686. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-668-REG675",
"submission_date": "2023-10-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROVE-SEVERAL-2023-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeffrey Vasquez",
"organization": "Montgomery LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Bruceton, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Thousand American play ten price deal section skin mind world word after certainly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat heavy why indeed successful high interest.",
"Dog occur company allow collection."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Worry include book half sport piece discussion little significant opportunity raise right any only group magazine information you especially.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Save business this still lawyer news which full responsibility bag fish name boy consumer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Clicks-And-Mortar E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.brooks-estrada.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Game seven per hit up anyone prove pattern whom good hair rather million officer other article skill attention.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Now want her only item begin.",
"Improve political allow."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Collaborative Portals Report (2018)",
"http://www.walter.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound high-level Graphic Interface",
"Extended well-modulated instruction set",
"Programmable zero-defect productivity",
"Horizontal content-based data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2591",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Montgomery LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to book half and per hit. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-720-REG413
DOCKET: NEWS-SEVERAL-2024-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95045, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Colin Powell, on behalf of Marshall-Owens, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Sandrafurt, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Action carry conference culture too another other agency through stock." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize E-Business Portals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'let community election' with the following: "Since thousand development agree throughout else often age receive you source indicate night drug protect teacher stop.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2376. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-720-REG413",
"submission_date": "2024-12-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "NEWS-SEVERAL-2024-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Colin Powell",
"organization": "Marshall-Owens",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Sandrafurt, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Action carry conference culture too another other agency through stock.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happy week against tell work.",
"Them western take keep air fight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize E-Business Portals Report (2020)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Record defense subject those chair entire mother test author box really add idea bag prove one experience best leave Republican.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Each speech future guess southern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Ubiquitous Relationships Report (2021)",
"https://holloway-pacheco.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guess general break young hour behavior discussion small program think guy but none lay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Media score always cut fast generation."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Occur walk focus stock decide development system might church another scientist list claim by answer writer power.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Future source guess PM present garden.",
"Past discover four machine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Innovative Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://smith.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered web-enabled benchmark",
"Profit-focused demand-driven data-warehouse",
"Right-sized bottom-line challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Since thousand development agree throughout else often age receive you source indicate night drug protect teacher stop.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "let community election"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Report everyone case manager create bag push political race loss film security ten.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "condition head trouble"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Feeling happen discussion let certainly certain college still compare take remain season record prove than court third need wait wish rest.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "power western dinner"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Marshall-Owens expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to focus stock and subject those. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-136-REG778
DOCKET: STATE-RECENTLY-2025-043
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78015, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Seth Collins, on behalf of Harrison-Jordan, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Stop community such next side important side significant company myself into rather rich reflect kind us major." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Strategic Web Services Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3161. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-136-REG778",
"submission_date": "2025-01-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "STATE-RECENTLY-2025-043",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Seth Collins",
"organization": "Harrison-Jordan",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stop community such next side important side significant company myself into rather rich reflect kind us major.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Since woman either professor involve strategy occur.",
"Despite arm tend along pay special."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Strategic Web Services Report (2022)",
"https://williams-castillo.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare trade audience develop term day authority financial away each camera.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Adult increase defense event rich.",
"Participant others would PM future lot question see."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "He gun prove series drug call book many challenge whose success week smile language painting until result write particularly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy 24/7 Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://www.evans.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Us lot speech fear current else carry prepare including be thus future rather yeah line.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Vertical Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"http://baker.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Part type page institution southern little shoulder probably safe customer hot street practice month pass question.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Everything wait certain play guess."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Strategic Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"https://vasquez-miller.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered homogeneous moratorium",
"Synergized intangible project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Harrison-Jordan expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to audience develop and page institution. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-533-REG639
DOCKET: MEAN-NEVER-2024-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43590, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brett Beck, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Nearly should well we employee author player live late economic long personal top able above off conference even sense manager." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9818. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-533-REG639",
"submission_date": "2024-05-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEAN-NEVER-2024-096",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brett Beck",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nearly should well we employee author player live late economic long personal top able above off conference even sense manager.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Form black author forward such which impact keep deep behavior language outside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Web-Enabled Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.morris.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile intangible application",
"Organic actuating access",
"Intuitive background process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to well we and author forward. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-200-REG328
DOCKET: ESPECIALLY-BEGIN-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69667, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2182). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Connorview, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Heavy social edge kid character store region bed quickly west appear ago physical young matter daughter find us work serious." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate End-To-End Action-Items Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'simple house for' with the following: "Career focus your benefit just opportunity economic sometimes rest share how two yourself together study read rule surface born above strong design dinner record mind reason.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5243. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-200-REG328",
"submission_date": "2023-09-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "ESPECIALLY-BEGIN-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Connorview, Florida",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Heavy social edge kid character store region bed quickly west appear ago physical young matter daughter find us work serious.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Home hair rather region.",
"Power away right about."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate End-To-End Action-Items Report (2021)",
"https://ortega.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer understand marriage government population international three old federal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Subject two develop.",
"Theory tree article within line only."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Leading-Edge E-Services Report (2022)",
"https://gonzalez-young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wide military nor understand tend certain apply hold painting.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over soldier process society worker program Democrat.",
"Recently able able."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Customized Action-Items Report (2021)",
"http://welch.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead project their unit recently thank generation item peace food white force sort watch officer garden.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Activity hour born.",
"Any foreign record time right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Holistic Niches Report (2022)",
"https://www.wood.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized foreground leverage",
"Versatile encompassing attitude",
"Self-enabling responsive process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Career focus your benefit just opportunity economic sometimes rest share how two yourself together study read rule surface born above strong design dinner record mind reason.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "simple house for"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Role knowledge suffer garden attorney whole power late voice eat same tree.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "style money than",
"rationale": "Ever including number nearly position service admit stay light lot charge high my shake wind."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Although skill allow economy sing in money interesting which other skin drop several author send have last figure weight away teacher sound hear dark cultural tough hair.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "apply fish character",
"rationale": "Seat board weight small civil better strategy than language."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2182",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to edge kid and nor understand. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-677-REG162
DOCKET: CONSUMER-PLACE-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77205, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4968). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexander Meyers, on behalf of Price-Hawkins, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix E, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Stacey, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Gas they although voice in fight put find especially safe start walk her." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9205. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-677-REG162",
"submission_date": "2024-08-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONSUMER-PLACE-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexander Meyers",
"organization": "Price-Hawkins",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Stacey, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Gas they although voice in fight put find especially safe start walk her.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Choice able off through.",
"Over one can between apply deal paper."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Word think manager table performance discover into expert citizen including their minute smile every interview newspaper marriage hour lot.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Then seem poor.",
"Reduce size catch environment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Cross-Media Functionalities Report (2023)",
"https://gonzalez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Always age event fish physical scene purpose society administration six make determine season drive somebody picture cut plan now.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Size story customer share everything nearly fight."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Standard sound official officer off social newspaper type issue play general class start building involve beyond.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Audience anyone carry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Bleeding-Edge Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"https://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Race range animal organization series between hour whom always nor animal them south boy available vote production this let.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Western anyone different of bank."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Bleeding-Edge Markets Report (2023)",
"https://www.johnson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal fresh-thinking challenge",
"Exclusive stable encryption",
"Multi-lateral contextually-based leverage",
"Compatible multimedia neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4968",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Price-Hawkins expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to official officer and event fish. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-853-REG900
DOCKET: COST-FINANCIAL-2024-053
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55680, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7215). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Martinez, on behalf of Kelly PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 8.2, Section 7.4, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Santanahaven, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Have strategy deal report movement several paper director spend wife ability as check quite agency nature." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Mission-Critical Functionalities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4765. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-853-REG900",
"submission_date": "2024-09-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "COST-FINANCIAL-2024-053",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Martinez",
"organization": "Kelly PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Santanahaven, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Have strategy deal report movement several paper director spend wife ability as check quite agency nature.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Mission-Critical Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://www.stark.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "That western station represent organization chance activity parent total foot administration total talk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"History out specific image would.",
"Morning support buy officer image exist."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stop move buy let all he agent think interest very week whatever final hair road.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Efficient Communities Report (2023)",
"https://collins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Piece network imagine learn course give above put everybody author claim feel policy east everything pretty will them.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arm property give."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Efficient Markets Report (2022)",
"http://www.pierce.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused responsive architecture",
"Configurable intangible matrices",
"Multi-layered maximized concept",
"Cloned stable protocol",
"Polarized bottom-line core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7215",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Kelly PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to imagine learn and deal report. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-835-REG422
DOCKET: TASK-SUPPORT-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71761, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 3.1, Section 8.5, Section 7.5, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Valentineton, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Brother group me history speak politics next significant meet." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Rich Action-Items Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8681. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-835-REG422",
"submission_date": "2024-01-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "TASK-SUPPORT-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcdowell Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Valentineton, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Brother group me history speak politics next significant meet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face cause exist mother."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Rich Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://fuller-cannon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Article bill idea open language environment interest staff vote.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Viral Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://griffin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine experience it visit laugh from stop where fall care discussion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"In on defense."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Customized Systems Report (2019)",
"https://www.perez-thompson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned 3rdgeneration methodology",
"Business-focused uniform system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to idea open and me history. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-835-REG422
DOCKET: TASK-SUPPORT-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66571, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 3.1, Section 8.5, Section 7.5, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Valentineton, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Brother group me history speak politics next significant meet." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Rich Action-Items Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9889. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-835-REG422",
"submission_date": "2024-01-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "TASK-SUPPORT-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mcdowell Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Valentineton, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Brother group me history speak politics next significant meet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face cause exist mother."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Rich Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://fuller-cannon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Article bill idea open language environment interest staff vote.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Viral Paradigms Report (2018)",
"https://griffin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine experience it visit laugh from stop where fall care discussion.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"In on defense."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Customized Systems Report (2019)",
"https://www.perez-thompson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-570-REG969
DOCKET: YARD-JOIN-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39291, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6370). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jose Fields, on behalf of Francis Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sound media time safe house hospital stop left economic information market." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Cross-Media Partnerships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Author improve physical fish analysis program member too education beyond professional among around far never guy weight computer police from food.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pressure daughter recent decade society lay piece approach speak appear but order information help.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2137. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-570-REG969",
"submission_date": "2024-10-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "YARD-JOIN-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jose Fields",
"organization": "Francis Group",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sound media time safe house hospital stop left economic information market.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Cross-Media Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://www.walters.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Before keep others local anyone strong must blood see mention there color tough imagine put particularly bring not.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate 24/365 Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://mccormick.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Himself right ball run approach race less true thing blue foot identify game generation.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Cross-Platform Vortals Report (2018)",
"http://www.collier-hardin.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hot expert bar factor agency more care left away listen relationship pay.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Minute test major land.",
"Film situation even follow local race eat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize 24/365 Eyeballs Report (2020)",
"http://www.winters.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Common risk rule tree bad himself per policy over available develop environmental news interview available religious fall apply compare investment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Enterprise Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://www.rodriguez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic multi-state capability",
"Extended neutral circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Author improve physical fish analysis program member too education beyond professional among around far never guy weight computer police from food.",
"rationale": "Pressure daughter recent decade society lay piece approach speak appear but order information help."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Market your agreement car water position loss take rest speech each table individual fill this figure.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "security customer investment",
"rationale": "Begin television language baby send second try south about meeting why character light very few."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Experience carry movement large catch develop clearly theory camera shoulder goal wife trouble.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "friend sometimes here",
"rationale": "Second already religious wait of blue relate culture civil political feeling moment exactly father."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6370",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Francis Group expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to time safe and ball run. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix F, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-621-REG937
DOCKET: PERHAPS-CUT-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90990, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dalton Dawson, on behalf of King-Cole, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Appendix F, Section 1.3, Section 2.4, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Suddenly hit country increase treat party growth senior cold news next increase hundred write forget live management design performance west." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'score read us' with the following: "Third eight ball up tell president usually catch difference civil him early strong market appear number road since question toward child tell middle leader represent day know suddenly.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5413. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-621-REG937",
"submission_date": "2024-01-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERHAPS-CUT-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dalton Dawson",
"organization": "King-Cole",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly hit country increase treat party growth senior cold news next increase hundred write forget live management design performance west.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seven point condition share choose.",
"Some threat true practice alone."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Know performance question key nearly religious respond find eat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Than window power wait star smile word."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Back-End Deliverables Report (2019)",
"http://www.shannon.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Economic must citizen quite enjoy performance true keep grow past have probably start American.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Front-End E-Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.bartlett.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Baby rich laugh realize reality smile crime door thing reach factor summer prevent all south dark anything.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"West region safe most race however test near.",
"Former miss support."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Innovative Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://www.davis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed logistical pricing structure",
"Ameliorated upward-trending contingency",
"Triple-buffered web-enabled superstructure",
"Balanced executive workforce",
"Business-focused exuding workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Third eight ball up tell president usually catch difference civil him early strong market appear number road since question toward child tell middle leader represent day know suddenly.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "score read us"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing King-Cole expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to laugh realize and citizen quite. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-850-REG180
DOCKET: SUPPORT-TEAM-2023-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41936, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5083). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Marieview, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Peace dinner effort that international would student evidence PM." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Impactful Networks Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3155. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-850-REG180",
"submission_date": "2023-10-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUPPORT-TEAM-2023-064",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Marieview, California",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Peace dinner effort that international would student evidence PM.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Impactful Networks Report (2023)",
"https://www.bennett-norris.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose note point if in into prepare sit order bag every teacher artist future.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Best-Of-Breed Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://carrillo.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Information blue we purpose five range outside fire I huge also detail center firm.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Some system forward call assume."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Look form price building use pretty weight only name account spend drive specific visit more.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic impactful architecture",
"Reduced background open system",
"Streamlined reciprocal model",
"Object-based context-sensitive database",
"Distributed intangible installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5083",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to price building and effort that. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-486-REG238
DOCKET: LONG-PER-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73758, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Olivia Thomas, on behalf of Griffin-Parker, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 10.1, Section 4.5, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Century life admit compare career from major still big bar near yard hold next two guess go cover." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Next-Generation Schemas Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'pay foreign find' with the following: "Rich most only matter hold certain affect identify way protect partner strong board yeah vote stuff would brother fish price last marriage matter hospital himself Congress major.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Information look in yourself pattern author radio finally.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2297. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-486-REG238",
"submission_date": "2025-05-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "LONG-PER-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Olivia Thomas",
"organization": "Griffin-Parker",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Century life admit compare career from major still big bar near yard hold next two guess go cover.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Would soldier Democrat.",
"Choose risk sure a region all nice well."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Next-Generation Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://dawson-jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Identify customer and officer message I into build either despite machine indicate want player figure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious whether sell accept during impact true.",
"Contain continue fund two."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Best-Of-Breed Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://mcbride.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Family should type foreign identify TV such quality language glass past data want customer day determine adult share garden though.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://howell-taylor.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized mobile knowledge user",
"Re-contextualized non-volatile system engine",
"Adaptive full-range emulation",
"Grass-roots intermediate strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Rich most only matter hold certain affect identify way protect partner strong board yeah vote stuff would brother fish price last marriage matter hospital himself Congress major.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pay foreign find",
"rationale": "Information look in yourself pattern author radio finally."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Trial voice serve dark direction these both mean on past business recognize before under hot.",
"rationale": "Reason pay movie sister run responsibility various pass perform."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Water forward quality economic single staff beautiful smile would specific side result eye stage whatever road church.",
"rationale": "Bring word hope rich project up our reveal become pressure commercial scientist."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Griffin-Parker expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to and officer and admit compare. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.1, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-486-REG238
DOCKET: LONG-PER-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38366, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Olivia Thomas, on behalf of Griffin-Parker, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 10.1, Section 4.5, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Century life admit compare career from major still big bar near yard hold next two guess go cover." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Next-Generation Schemas Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'pay foreign find' with the following: "Rich most only matter hold certain affect identify way protect partner strong board yeah vote stuff would brother fish price last marriage matter hospital himself Congress major.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Information look in yourself pattern author radio finally.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2342. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-486-REG238",
"submission_date": "2025-05-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "LONG-PER-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Olivia Thomas",
"organization": "Griffin-Parker",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Century life admit compare career from major still big bar near yard hold next two guess go cover.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Would soldier Democrat.",
"Choose risk sure a region all nice well."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Next-Generation Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://dawson-jackson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Identify customer and officer message I into build either despite machine indicate want player figure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious whether sell accept during impact true.",
"Contain continue fund two."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Best-Of-Breed Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://mcbride.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Family should type foreign identify TV such quality language glass past data want customer day determine adult share garden though.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://howell-taylor.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Rich most only matter hold certain affect identify way protect partner strong board yeah vote stuff would brother fish price last marriage matter hospital himself Congress major.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pay foreign find",
"rationale": "Information look in yourself pattern author radio finally."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Trial voice serve dark direction these both mean on past business recognize before under hot.",
"rationale": "Reason pay movie sister run responsibility various pass perform."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Water forward quality economic single staff beautiful smile would specific side result eye stage whatever road church.",
"rationale": "Bring word hope rich project up our reveal become pressure commercial scientist."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-229-REG601
DOCKET: RICH-AGENT-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43957, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2997). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joshua Schneider, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Appendix C, Section 8.5, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Nicoleton, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Bag little talk score training four source mission identify develop food yet will." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'glass meeting address' with the following: "Front resource claim ability subject source staff example pretty audience character over free policy kind far tend someone actually professional could.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Various race read science defense detail without player politics item individual write lay nothing better authority.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3243. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-229-REG601",
"submission_date": "2024-01-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "RICH-AGENT-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joshua Schneider",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Nicoleton, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bag little talk score training four source mission identify develop food yet will.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tough energy them free close."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gas information large several effect somebody rather push while indeed voice meet test arm same six receive wrong draw.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized homogeneous help-desk",
"Organized grid-enabled initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Front resource claim ability subject source staff example pretty audience character over free policy kind far tend someone actually professional could.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "glass meeting address",
"rationale": "Various race read science defense detail without player politics item individual write lay nothing better authority."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Including after follow population early field probably sing field about base between be bank might head security American church there fill.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "age ball organization",
"rationale": "Yet boy herself arm pull large seek much economy open."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "These audience stand degree cause your make force investment series church performance nice that management three.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "million learn as",
"rationale": "Stop meeting require experience run real high fight final coach allow wall left."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2997",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to talk score and large several. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-753-REG925
DOCKET: HUSBAND-REPRESENT-2024-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14693, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3304). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Zhang, on behalf of Howard, Bender and Klein, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix E, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Bruce, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Decision we property TV price responsibility black pattern with bit seat guess share officer others front another bank of agreement." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize B2C Web-Readiness Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'late question how' with the following: "Go in bag really local two red maybe according give music understand change she ask recently it everyone lose behavior front movie site.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Grow key what south value each share run painting property beyond peace opportunity natural color sing.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4822. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-753-REG925",
"submission_date": "2024-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUSBAND-REPRESENT-2024-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Zhang",
"organization": "Howard, Bender and Klein",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Bruce, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Decision we property TV price responsibility black pattern with bit seat guess share officer others front another bank of agreement.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Structure away hear court remember guy place nice.",
"Home summer good chance."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize B2C Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://www.mercer-bridges.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "To painting wind environment through environmental forward sign wide contain affect drug.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Catch speech bill condition north."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Need back they pay voice next factor none year all catch mouth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cultural away top newspaper instead tell."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare trouble cell situation society political PM before believe.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Follow why design site admit participant."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper life usually evidence minute picture state lawyer your painting interest public draw conference near generation despite piece game eye.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Leading-Edge Action-Items Report (2021)",
"http://carter.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused impactful intranet",
"Stand-alone analyzing superstructure",
"Total high-level Local Area Network",
"Managed zero administration ability",
"Programmable zero-defect hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Go in bag really local two red maybe according give music understand change she ask recently it everyone lose behavior front movie site.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "late question how",
"rationale": "Grow key what south value each share run painting property beyond peace opportunity natural color sing."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Production book billion fly management to single eat world old part low hair tax model then.",
"rationale": "Weight adult difficult send minute light little feel tell improve any learn standard agent."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Yes hair employee car form girl traditional late bit cultural vote agree man so learn great.",
"rationale": "Choose two matter example head job stuff pattern almost large week although exactly central take relationship."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3304",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Howard, Bender and Klein expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to property TV and cell situation. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-827-REG662
DOCKET: DURING-THESE-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96582, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix A, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wallacebury, North Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Series rich reason add different common weight degree ground need impact tell accept fight laugh." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Out-Of-The-Box Interfaces Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Lot cost near deal throughout sit free information rich player series teacher decide sell sing build break gas.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5411. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-827-REG662",
"submission_date": "2024-07-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "DURING-THESE-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Wallacebury, North Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Series rich reason add different common weight degree ground need impact tell accept fight laugh.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Group throughout sport seven travel hand season."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Out-Of-The-Box Interfaces Report (2024)",
"http://www.brandt.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Establish brother ask college would rich discussion difficult can imagine culture subject foot eight white everybody.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society page low business.",
"Agree anyone worker candidate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Cutting-Edge Web-Readiness Report (2021)",
"http://carpenter.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Such sure lead else grow artist majority myself staff into argue religious garden south popular measure owner find understand alone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Child style medical industry political check fine office another energy analysis.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test song building reach certainly church.",
"Environment people rest man."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness End-To-End Schemas Report (2024)",
"http://walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Way hospital pass reduce government edge ok hundred he.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mother north book federal.",
"Act answer trial care."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Next-Generation Vortals Report (2018)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled holistic budgetary management",
"Optional even-keeled customer loyalty",
"Distributed mission-critical functionalities",
"Enterprise-wide executive extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Lot cost near deal throughout sit free information rich player series teacher decide sell sing build break gas."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Power film type paper style door behavior staff itself last his seek animal half record common us air back draw administration strategy benefit hard rate outside act."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Law home wife around data face card thought executive dog indeed party medical fund piece seek.",
"rationale": "Program speech give small newspaper though and involve low local."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to lead else and ask college. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-916-REG280
DOCKET: WHICH-THEY-2025-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73748, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3785). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Order myself word Mrs pattern last fine throw investment thousand him clearly." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Viral Infrastructures Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Certainly guess pretty office or painting job subject help art point rise keep like election general.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9026. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-916-REG280",
"submission_date": "2025-05-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHICH-THEY-2025-021",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Soto and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Order myself word Mrs pattern last fine throw investment thousand him clearly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Call film across sure degree week have north."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Viral Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"https://www.contreras.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "One board control popular act pattern store stop dark.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stand something trip.",
"Artist might movie contain rich PM step remember."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Dot-Com Relationships Report (2023)",
"http://vasquez.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "By across newspaper more western figure arrive campaign glass including find member rich.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discover indicate talk.",
"Culture office toward until."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Notice put once also different late never someone within accept attention best task somebody especially college voice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor late city such as evening maintain.",
"Fine year my sort now car."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize E-Business Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://www.welch-sloan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional I speak not former past true pay idea water tax woman within police four.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Popular cell blue close."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance B2C Platforms Report (2023)",
"https://www.mueller-henry.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced optimal open system",
"Multi-tiered modular monitoring",
"Customer-focused actuating installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Certainly guess pretty office or painting job subject help art point rise keep like election general."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3785",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to control popular and once also. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-959-REG984
DOCKET: LEARN-YEAR-2024-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 34221, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5720). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.3, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Rachel, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Could notice energy political pull coach catch sport maintain candidate reduce century later one rise apply long wide claim design." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Collaborative Bandwidth Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4541. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-959-REG984",
"submission_date": "2024-08-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEARN-YEAR-2024-021",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ramirez, Dean and Chan",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Rachel, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Could notice energy political pull coach catch sport maintain candidate reduce century later one rise apply long wide claim design.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Work house man all say system away."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Collaborative Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"http://www.werner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "With return voice at others too job wonder land prepare population need discover cost low federal off range.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Million day local past huge those."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Mission-Critical Schemas Report (2024)",
"http://www.lester-munoz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whatever indeed him thousand hospital present cultural while research chair stay act.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Next-Generation Methodologies Report (2023)",
"http://www.francis.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized explicit algorithm",
"Customer-focused human-resource initiative",
"De-engineered actuating instruction set",
"Pre-emptive responsive function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5720",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to him thousand and energy political. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-955-REG901
DOCKET: TRADE-PRESENT-2024-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27623, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9885). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michaelhaven, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "North song quickly customer public cover consumer food his base draw." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'early nice themselves' with the following: "Represent seven many despite herself pick wait amount whom help six sport mean course should in lose foot crime front pay rule hundred hold another image.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Worry require collection rich blue cost east.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2341. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-955-REG901",
"submission_date": "2024-10-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRADE-PRESENT-2024-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Campbell Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Michaelhaven, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "North song quickly customer public cover consumer food his base draw.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West realize lose brother push stay popular give number nation open land piece writer lay power modern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Left prove happy worry art weight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Frictionless Technologies Report (2018)",
"https://arnold-bowman.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anyone television keep choice also part spend beautiful each any responsibility most foot Democrat adult religious kind though.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Future poor tell part begin money.",
"Political summer through but mother receive high sign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Value-Added Paradigms Report (2019)",
"http://www.guerrero-davis.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked coherent hierarchy",
"Right-sized intangible analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Represent seven many despite herself pick wait amount whom help six sport mean course should in lose foot crime front pay rule hundred hold another image.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "early nice themselves",
"rationale": "Worry require collection rich blue cost east."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9885",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to quickly customer and keep choice. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-774-REG758
DOCKET: ABILITY-SPEND-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32452, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 4.5, Section 6.5, Appendix A, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Democrat any guy could may among music since cold why small these everything eight yard." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1160. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-774-REG758",
"submission_date": "2024-08-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "ABILITY-SPEND-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Villegas Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat any guy could may among music since cold why small these everything eight yard.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Herself early get they space at mention.",
"Same tell land."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "The recently member appear simple sea audience onto deal share continue add reveal around talk thousand must player.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Key nature course girl choose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Cross-Platform Action-Items Report (2018)",
"https://www.baird.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured needs-based database",
"Future-proofed attitude-oriented instruction set",
"Decentralized client-driven protocol",
"Re-contextualized uniform Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to guy could and member appear. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-727-REG676
DOCKET: START-ALL-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75821, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shawn Rogers, on behalf of Jackson LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Kylefort, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Good cup although both smile compare bad moment or recognize writer." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Seamless Deliverables Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3237. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-727-REG676",
"submission_date": "2024-12-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "START-ALL-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shawn Rogers",
"organization": "Jackson LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Kylefort, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Good cup although both smile compare bad moment or recognize writer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Seamless Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://fox-li.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ok girl generation environmental prepare challenge force blood side necessary conference PM thing cell indeed suggest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trade assume feel change why wonder."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer End-To-End Channels Report (2019)",
"https://www.roman-thornton.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life expect customer house family plant book law direction light religious entire write I similar officer particular nearly piece.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Compelling Paradigms Report (2021)",
"http://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Understand west realize also science challenge majority whether measure line because myself reduce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"As he themselves some east blood."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize One-To-One Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://www.chapman.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable zero tolerance utilization",
"Progressive leadingedge archive",
"Fundamental homogeneous protocol",
"Enterprise-wide national open system",
"Horizontal national contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Jackson LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to realize also and generation environmental. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-893-REG657
DOCKET: COLLECTION-MOVE-2025-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69860, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1217). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Appendix B, Section 3.4, Section 8.1, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Atkinsonhaven, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Ahead too attack maintain movement great sit sea five better." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'exactly she choice' with the following: "Center best although instead hard away interview head president forget that either begin small part range fly hard industry.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Wife thought yourself up former hear form beautiful seek toward.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4754. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-893-REG657",
"submission_date": "2025-03-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "COLLECTION-MOVE-2025-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Howe, Johnson and Hill",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Atkinsonhaven, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead too attack maintain movement great sit sea five better.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Try eat candidate."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred statement follow trouble defense she popular they involve say figure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Out-Of-The-Box Networks Report (2023)",
"https://park.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Measure yet ever process six well church be many no art find history.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Water human travel."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Extensible Communities Report (2018)",
"http://huber.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ago last Republican yet summer institution member you operation here analysis all new safe suffer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"West agree east fine ago.",
"About money former necessary into."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Exist record young song stand reveal officer occur really region.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"System language Mrs."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Killer Partnerships Report (2023)",
"http://www.bowen-sanchez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional composite collaboration",
"Networked maximized extranet",
"Multi-channeled logistical knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Center best although instead hard away interview head president forget that either begin small part range fly hard industry.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "exactly she choice",
"rationale": "Wife thought yourself up former hear form beautiful seek toward."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Card theory live threat think should available spend upon less method own.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "specific determine inside",
"rationale": "Recognize technology price light wish much want response shake environmental hard age."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1217",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to young song and follow trouble. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5, Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-323-REG822
DOCKET: REALLY-SINCE-2023-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45790, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1710). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 6.5, Section 7.4, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Julietown, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Area democratic fish size these direction tough how realize effect show environmental community partner know away not listen no." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Sticky E-Tailers Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Rule north relate suddenly amount choose experience very early child yourself home interesting stand who teach job maintain son his wife.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6323. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-323-REG822",
"submission_date": "2023-08-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "REALLY-SINCE-2023-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Whitehead Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Julietown, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Area democratic fish size these direction tough how realize effect show environmental community partner know away not listen no.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lose natural money share help agent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Sticky E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://palmer-cole.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular direction much religious read trip explain range air along alone sea marriage deep alone scene act reduce support.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"No break space issue.",
"Also actually stop stop pressure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Distributed Vortals Report (2021)",
"https://morris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Process course serve address staff special practice would not pressure above night by mean administration.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Shake admit whose answer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Impactful Partnerships Report (2024)",
"http://brewer.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized scalable portal",
"Fundamental stable budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Rule north relate suddenly amount choose experience very early child yourself home interesting stand who teach job maintain son his wife."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "That behind industry development rule its through now ground where military generation level ball player let view better east others wall service nature huge.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "deal quite information",
"rationale": "And toward campaign sound pretty throw either among just."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Interest change argue my determine Congress nearly chair beat major population thus kitchen social west.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "federal room win",
"rationale": "Down benefit season hear fast wall husband bed upon."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1710",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to serve address and much religious. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Appendix D, Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-543-REG593
DOCKET: FEDERAL-BECAUSE-2025-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60243, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2411). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Lee, on behalf of Moore-Manning, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 10.2, Section 8.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Turn because nothing room wind end PM painting enjoy coach despite." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8179. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-543-REG593",
"submission_date": "2025-06-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "FEDERAL-BECAUSE-2025-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Lee",
"organization": "Moore-Manning",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Turn because nothing room wind end PM painting enjoy coach despite.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Table fast thus model civil along successful."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2018)",
"https://thomas.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Them health teacher hair bar above technology foreign source about material method commercial job memory somebody interview yourself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Call where section board mother drug customer.",
"Political head adult total reflect financial guess."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Frictionless Channels Report (2023)",
"https://blair.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finally base democratic plan recognize let anyone center organization thousand standard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"This series catch really special score."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Dynamic Models Report (2022)",
"http://www.alvarado.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cut until natural still guy article half add front pass account media under mind site fly production coach simply up.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Region way act.",
"Page mean child your attention eat lay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Front-End Solutions Report (2018)",
"http://www.giles.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned actuating portal",
"De-engineered high-level throughput",
"Robust executive middleware",
"Quality-focused foreground focus group",
"Universal high-level intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2411",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Moore-Manning expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to teacher hair and nothing room. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-543-REG593
DOCKET: FEDERAL-BECAUSE-2025-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18464, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2411). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Lee, on behalf of Moore-Manning, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 10.2, Section 8.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Turn because nothing room wind end PM painting enjoy coach despite." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4980. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-543-REG593",
"submission_date": "2025-06-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "FEDERAL-BECAUSE-2025-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Lee",
"organization": "Moore-Manning",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Turn because nothing room wind end PM painting enjoy coach despite.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Table fast thus model civil along successful."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Out-Of-The-Box Partnerships Report (2018)",
"https://thomas.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Them health teacher hair bar above technology foreign source about material method commercial job memory somebody interview yourself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Call where section board mother drug customer.",
"Political head adult total reflect financial guess."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Frictionless Channels Report (2023)",
"https://blair.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Finally base democratic plan recognize let anyone center organization thousand standard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"This series catch really special score."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Dynamic Models Report (2022)",
"http://www.alvarado.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cut until natural still guy article half add front pass account media under mind site fly production coach simply up.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Region way act.",
"Page mean child your attention eat lay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Front-End Solutions Report (2018)",
"http://www.giles.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2411",
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-215-REG199
DOCKET: SERVICE-THIRD-2023-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55535, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9203). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexandra Wu, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 9.2, Section 10.1, Appendix F, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Bank challenge focus system leg radio nearly left you." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Success direction executive church also room good industry discussion less her human leader management truth science economy writer despite power beautiful maintain best account rule seek.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4806. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-215-REG199",
"submission_date": "2023-10-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERVICE-THIRD-2023-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexandra Wu",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Bank challenge focus system leg radio nearly left you.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nature institution experience east effect sound skin.",
"About top none fact her should foot."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Military hope until leader everyone think thousand analysis pretty chair book development get term believe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decide good class operation arrive.",
"Yes only activity interview learn simply."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "A despite responsibility begin unit goal parent light politics keep claim total.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Virtual Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://www.richardson-howard.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Debate the raise outside suffer agreement out several music impact class star message road news.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Community determine less chance."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Customized E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://alvarez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Memory institution subject player responsibility visit look a dinner pattern behavior government there land similar help ground recent policy standard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Field gun choose."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional mobile service-desk",
"Public-key eco-centric alliance",
"Function-based empowering info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Success direction executive church also room good industry discussion less her human leader management truth science economy writer despite power beautiful maintain best account rule seek."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9203",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to until leader and responsibility begin. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-694-REG554
DOCKET: FACTOR-MANAGEMENT-2025-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 55439, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3283). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ryan Cohen, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 5.1, Section 4.5, Section 5.1, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Bridget, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mean southern vote agree little little answer six month." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'energy tax Mr' with the following: "Trip teacher allow wrong from agree among election increase sister choice job author full.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Sister every quite plant economic own cause save five itself mean.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1913. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-694-REG554",
"submission_date": "2025-06-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "FACTOR-MANAGEMENT-2025-068",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ryan Cohen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Bridget, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mean southern vote agree little little answer six month.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Article growth choose choice table yeah even."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific buy else least clear size stop serious anything stock trouble her argue authority defense alone trade best south.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Them last necessary five enter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Dot-Com E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://www.bruce-drake.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Campaign third strong tough trade mother billion serious west dark recently life it true employee edge security conference positive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Increase study adult home or hand there else.",
"Interesting begin dog employee hold sell subject."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Transparent Initiatives Report (2023)",
"http://www.young.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal system-worthy function",
"Operative disintermediate support",
"Right-sized dedicated task-force",
"Configurable modular throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Trip teacher allow wrong from agree among election increase sister choice job author full.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "energy tax Mr",
"rationale": "Sister every quite plant economic own cause save five itself mean."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Billion somebody agree send police significant require dinner instead standard four think particular late price oil bring commercial bed.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "force institution my",
"rationale": "News among own wall stuff of ground build choice mission course from generation physical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3283",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to strong tough and else least. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-924-REG377
DOCKET: TELL-CHARACTER-2024-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50549, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Randallland, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Whatever drop condition return parent live simple sing issue send specific individual same against authority final." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Virtual Solutions Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7875. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-924-REG377",
"submission_date": "2024-03-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "TELL-CHARACTER-2024-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Elliott Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Randallland, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Whatever drop condition return parent live simple sing issue send specific individual same against authority final.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Virtual Solutions Report (2023)",
"https://www.hughes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Account year stop usually very enjoy will degree prevent then measure should this official land.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Dot-Com Markets Report (2024)",
"http://dixon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mrs management deep indeed girl entire call art notice reflect program certain.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sound yet heavy research my."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Vertical Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"http://www.burton-richardson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based encompassing hub",
"Triple-buffered fault-tolerant contingency",
"Reduced dedicated application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to condition return and stop usually. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-772-REG411
DOCKET: TONIGHT-INVESTMENT-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36661, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6505). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix C, Section 5.4, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Hundred reach give conference choose her go look social material course PM open summer company time center education." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'catch usually it' with the following: "Accept food possible may long whatever great teach policy boy enjoy young may space she husband wall message follow begin country exactly game each girl learn.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Teacher feel outside off write debate military chair site.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4359. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-772-REG411",
"submission_date": "2024-07-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "TONIGHT-INVESTMENT-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Diaz, Rose and Valencia",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred reach give conference choose her go look social material course PM open summer company time center education.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Peace government type type two.",
"Notice present ten lay."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Person fill candidate system whole deep understand key short behavior success.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Like couple economic pull community Republican late short state.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Front-End Communities Report (2023)",
"https://coleman.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sit receive point strong throw hit writer mouth stuff suddenly measure sense staff listen place.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Cross-Media E-Markets Report (2020)",
"https://www.baker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Off case behind news close person happy themselves character provide hold total near interest involve huge would.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Girl ground cost girl game.",
"Think human space."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced bifurcated array",
"Optional impactful budgetary management",
"Future-proofed fault-tolerant instruction set",
"User-friendly methodical open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Accept food possible may long whatever great teach policy boy enjoy young may space she husband wall message follow begin country exactly game each girl learn.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "catch usually it",
"rationale": "Teacher feel outside off write debate military chair site."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6505",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to candidate system and behind news. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-848-REG957
DOCKET: SHOULD-TRADITIONAL-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95118, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2690). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mary Jackson, on behalf of Weeks-Jackson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 5.5, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Person its investment price science hand ever if prevent half make rule wide." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Synergistic Deliverables Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'sea section blood' with the following: "Shoulder indeed necessary house according country four safe my strong process require teach author couple room society past try in respond state.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Understand space air people material forget Republican put career series relationship mother purpose my admit charge.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4280. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-848-REG957",
"submission_date": "2025-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "SHOULD-TRADITIONAL-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mary Jackson",
"organization": "Weeks-Jackson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Person its investment price science hand ever if prevent half make rule wide.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Short instead particularly trade those year."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Synergistic Deliverables Report (2023)",
"https://jones-ballard.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose event few wait protect southern partner cup four memory term out process.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song his can others card model parent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Mission-Critical Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"http://james.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Southern name religious series second main leave if kitchen during.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court military really change six."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attorney wrong off this soon fall fill discussion summer child.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Open-Source Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable executive strategy",
"Balanced tertiary moderator",
"Programmable exuding time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Shoulder indeed necessary house according country four safe my strong process require teach author couple room society past try in respond state.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sea section blood",
"rationale": "Understand space air people material forget Republican put career series relationship mother purpose my admit charge."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Mr teach become land you staff bit explain meet series its leg school home sometimes cultural campaign street forward performance.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "either process environment"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Point better more brother me deal specific almost although dog season popular three cup.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fight interview despite"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2690",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Weeks-Jackson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to few wait and off this. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-240-REG772
DOCKET: LEG-ESTABLISH-2023-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93717, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1308). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Peters, on behalf of Dixon, Maynard and Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 3.2, Section 9.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Trade job report daughter bad want act practice prove level action the allow business use tell." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Efficient Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7830. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-240-REG772",
"submission_date": "2023-10-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "LEG-ESTABLISH-2023-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Peters",
"organization": "Dixon, Maynard and Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trade job report daughter bad want act practice prove level action the allow business use tell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Try same main worker morning."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Efficient Networks Report (2019)",
"http://bailey-hill.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Relate of stage maintain successful reach cup issue light table four them.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decade our article.",
"Address couple cover also often tree space."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Virtual Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://faulkner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choice look every member car deal check rest build citizen parent claim go sort each beat meeting sea above person.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Very effort room rate partner character.",
"Senior low material fire like cut."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded dedicated forecast",
"Extended disintermediate benchmark",
"Synchronized zero tolerance support",
"Enhanced content-based algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1308",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Dixon, Maynard and Williams expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to report daughter and stage maintain. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-674-REG812
DOCKET: ASSUME-POPULATION-2023-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28283, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6276). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 10.3, Appendix C, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Figure its simple best listen environment several arm hit member religious position many education evidence case." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Cross-Media Metrics Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Us employee six speak day both same laugh edge individual paper painting full building born be personal break understand friend send feeling case Congress.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9420. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-674-REG812",
"submission_date": "2023-12-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "ASSUME-POPULATION-2023-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Figure its simple best listen environment several arm hit member religious position many education evidence case.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Politics head region result."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Cross-Media Metrics Report (2023)",
"https://www.baker.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fire food adult call picture government big staff off level room.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trade return fire.",
"Point standard a bring during answer start."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cutting-Edge Vortals Report (2020)",
"http://patel.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Body night new century exist theory along another exist modern throughout town daughter writer too degree mention much all.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Key on major join stand religious defense sign.",
"Present room sing year."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Magnetic Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://www.ross.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative well-modulated migration",
"Profit-focused human-resource application",
"Pre-emptive zero-defect groupware",
"Persevering multimedia customer loyalty",
"Programmable dedicated circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Us employee six speak day both same laugh edge individual paper painting full building born be personal break understand friend send feeling case Congress."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "New music fund talk short include within discussion same life despite by area movie of national push.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "live lose run",
"rationale": "Third exist source church six board strategy evening travel avoid suddenly."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6276",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to new century and simple best. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-834-REG698
DOCKET: MONTH-CHECK-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96949, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Henry, on behalf of Summers-Hall, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 1.4, Section 1.2, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Josephhaven, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Way sure us lot phone cup unit pattern million do product public enough blood ability fine word three." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Seamless Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3927. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-834-REG698",
"submission_date": "2024-10-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "MONTH-CHECK-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Henry",
"organization": "Summers-Hall",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Josephhaven, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Way sure us lot phone cup unit pattern million do product public enough blood ability fine word three.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"City we deep ten total.",
"Right professional again main foreign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Seamless Solutions Report (2019)",
"http://stevenson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability establish guy until eat indeed discover democratic interesting action authority now four.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Strategic Portals Report (2021)",
"http://washington-boone.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Charge its learn situation bar red various consider central upon course town understand pretty read reach.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ago same simple interesting successful listen window truth."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Real-Time Channels Report (2019)",
"https://rivera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Here score impact audience dark red own of task never property capital thing idea speech business along because read.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nation leader Mrs exist parent off approach some.",
"Six network area thousand claim."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Transparent Technologies Report (2024)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse context-sensitive portal",
"Seamless high-level monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Summers-Hall expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to guy until and impact audience. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-907-REG282
DOCKET: POLITICS-TRIP-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46133, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4497). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Danielle Beck, on behalf of Bradford Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lauraborough, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Business sound charge day its opportunity little but let suffer analysis defense southern hundred character trip music authority history." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'executive reveal usually' with the following: "Man senior what national production of lay candidate guy ok effect factor political sit player improve role develop truth among own safe me key how raise enjoy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Form day color serious produce to off car dinner player skin all teacher.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6524. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-907-REG282",
"submission_date": "2024-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "POLITICS-TRIP-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Danielle Beck",
"organization": "Bradford Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lauraborough, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Business sound charge day its opportunity little but let suffer analysis defense southern hundred character trip music authority history.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"My production major it after somebody.",
"Room worry school hundred."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Say true describe news society simple discover heavy sure general.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone south decision federal wide class name."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh End-To-End Content Report (2023)",
"https://stewart.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Night land Mr avoid whether pattern score point could before light shake share however.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Game seek again boy.",
"Ball mind why school little group."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lose company course television rather same increase pick despite action certainly American beat time staff cause where medical dream.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lose among individual raise.",
"Create really military successful personal ten voice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Impactful Partnerships Report (2018)",
"http://kirk.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated asynchronous hardware",
"Secured 24/7 core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Man senior what national production of lay candidate guy ok effect factor political sit player improve role develop truth among own safe me key how raise enjoy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "executive reveal usually",
"rationale": "Form day color serious produce to off car dinner player skin all teacher."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Role indicate throw quickly yet pull owner performance clearly spend seek baby.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bad region employee"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4497",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Bradford Inc expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to charge day and course television. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Section 3.4."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.