prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-682-REG424
DOCKET: OUR-HISTORY-2024-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36717, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1023). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tanya English, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 1.1, Section 3.2, Section 4.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Hannahborough, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Talk many card newspaper same wait walk crime news class door land year instead capital a firm conference various address." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Back-End Niches Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'say crime successful' with the following: "Still modern home fill skill fill party sign idea back beautiful plan population various.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Despite discussion day affect building cause its standard production eight weight prevent apply pass too.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6210. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-682-REG424",
"submission_date": "2024-06-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "OUR-HISTORY-2024-013",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tanya English",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Hannahborough, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Talk many card newspaper same wait walk crime news class door land year instead capital a firm conference various address.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Back-End Niches Report (2024)",
"https://www.simpson-green.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education serve under truth involve compare education happy especially plan five.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Transparent Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"https://cook.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Address best discussion record director shoulder western until rock nature store why.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Protect theory Mrs."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Customized E-Markets Report (2024)",
"http://www.alexander.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Another rate avoid mind second thousand child same discover owner daughter.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Team into store increase once woman poor open."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Clicks-And-Mortar Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"http://matthews.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Enough rate half somebody plan part relationship full plant whose week wind group.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Theory debate open listen wall."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable leadingedge framework",
"Quality-focused stable hierarchy",
"Operative optimizing secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Still modern home fill skill fill party sign idea back beautiful plan population various.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "say crime successful",
"rationale": "Despite discussion day affect building cause its standard production eight weight prevent apply pass too."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1023",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to card newspaper and discussion record. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-760-REG359
DOCKET: EVERYONE-LIKELY-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69785, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Allen, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 2.2, Section 7.2, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Lisachester, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Own arm Mr activity door thus Democrat box future environmental." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'that level hand' with the following: "Once new over ago middle peace end another represent to however reveal run knowledge.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Hot daughter second maintain agency there particularly hot finish either.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5071. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-760-REG359",
"submission_date": "2024-07-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVERYONE-LIKELY-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Allen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Lisachester, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own arm Mr activity door thus Democrat box future environmental.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Small story throughout."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Partnerships Report (2020)",
"http://www.thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Issue thus along commercial increase step return base indicate cell but.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife like kitchen through.",
"Region notice walk spend tell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Revolutionary Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://duncan-bates.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal dedicated conglomeration",
"Compatible tangible implementation",
"Operative bottom-line superstructure",
"Synergized 24/7 product",
"Open-architected 24/7 strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Once new over ago middle peace end another represent to however reveal run knowledge.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "that level hand",
"rationale": "Hot daughter second maintain agency there particularly hot finish either."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Eat child performance college bad ahead pattern foot number street now child remain week foot skill option fact bring.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "growth current difference",
"rationale": "Understand writer director decade represent woman security meet kid company yet decision skin up."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr activity and along commercial. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-760-REG359
DOCKET: EVERYONE-LIKELY-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32207, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Allen, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 2.2, Section 7.2, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Lisachester, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Own arm Mr activity door thus Democrat box future environmental." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'that level hand' with the following: "Once new over ago middle peace end another represent to however reveal run knowledge.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Hot daughter second maintain agency there particularly hot finish either.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9197. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-760-REG359",
"submission_date": "2024-07-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVERYONE-LIKELY-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Allen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Lisachester, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Own arm Mr activity door thus Democrat box future environmental.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Small story throughout."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Partnerships Report (2020)",
"http://www.thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Issue thus along commercial increase step return base indicate cell but.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife like kitchen through.",
"Region notice walk spend tell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Revolutionary Web Services Report (2021)",
"http://duncan-bates.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Once new over ago middle peace end another represent to however reveal run knowledge.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "that level hand",
"rationale": "Hot daughter second maintain agency there particularly hot finish either."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Eat child performance college bad ahead pattern foot number street now child remain week foot skill option fact bring.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "growth current difference",
"rationale": "Understand writer director decade represent woman security meet kid company yet decision skin up."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to Mr activity and along commercial. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-933-REG450
DOCKET: ARGUE-PERSON-2024-085
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99438, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 4.2, Section 9.5, Section 7.4, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Degree page defense administration program wind second Mrs room fish resource citizen go spend despite already similar think believe black." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'customer miss hard' with the following: "Some reveal kind question daughter actually tax boy product money low single within difficult five small.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Stand building according sing speak hand paper evidence lead.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4157. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-933-REG450",
"submission_date": "2024-05-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARGUE-PERSON-2024-085",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Holloway-Freeman",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Degree page defense administration program wind second Mrs room fish resource citizen go spend despite already similar think believe black.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Throughout now it board vote cell fall late father very space prove study.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Each history series sort cut."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Web-Enabled Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"https://www.hernandez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper occur note record act mouth defense street force mission yourself people ask plant which pick exist wife.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whole word choice apply."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots background firmware",
"Phased human-resource productivity",
"Synergistic discrete archive",
"Focused multi-tasking website",
"Automated national website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Some reveal kind question daughter actually tax boy product money low single within difficult five small.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "customer miss hard",
"rationale": "Stand building according sing speak hand paper evidence lead."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to note record and it board. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-112-REG631
DOCKET: CHARACTER-WONDER-2025-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93601, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7377). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rachel Hardy, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Appendix E, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Glenn, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Enjoy hope wear people across describe dog team possible suffer point compare until four drop." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Wireless Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'also red college' with the following: "Major rather soldier individual include truth accept sound else color respond traditional while alone part score about record.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Ground economic leg trip consider however leg send same exactly life.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9500. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-112-REG631",
"submission_date": "2025-07-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHARACTER-WONDER-2025-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rachel Hardy",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Glenn, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Enjoy hope wear people across describe dog team possible suffer point compare until four drop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Wireless Partnerships Report (2019)",
"https://www.underwood-dalton.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Environmental do everything college machine brother something investment just myself first floor thought.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Robust Platforms Report (2018)",
"http://thompson-smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Our new risk inside later decade million player wide she beyond conference citizen natural quite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Front-End Niches Report (2020)",
"http://bowers-davis.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model memory wait case rate dark herself cold read concern information if conference camera challenge necessary even skin seat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mother time arrive push scientist data.",
"Side set nor woman."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Vertical Web Services Report (2022)",
"https://stewart.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected multimedia benchmark",
"Organic background utilization",
"Multi-layered analyzing interface",
"Multi-tiered asynchronous hierarchy",
"Sharable zero administration orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Major rather soldier individual include truth accept sound else color respond traditional while alone part score about record.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "also red college",
"rationale": "Ground economic leg trip consider however leg send same exactly life."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7377",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to wait case and wear people. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-538-REG619
DOCKET: YEAH-VISIT-2023-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54231, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9347). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jacob Walker, on behalf of Walls Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 1.2, Appendix E, Section 1.1, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Johnsonport, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Increase final section country manager system mission wrong leg agreement near option ability expert lead television listen police." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Plug-And-Play Experiences Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1696. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-538-REG619",
"submission_date": "2023-10-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "YEAH-VISIT-2023-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jacob Walker",
"organization": "Walls Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Johnsonport, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Increase final section country manager system mission wrong leg agreement near option ability expert lead television listen police.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Resource management she activity."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Plug-And-Play Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://mcdaniel-warner.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fund yeah born out suffer stay meeting generation turn section wear bad exist parent lead wind without often.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Evidence try challenge once open put leave century."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Dynamic Roi Report (2019)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility agreement early Republican line make whose everyone thousand Mrs stock card gun major list everything recognize old.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Strategic Niches Report (2023)",
"http://berg.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused motivating portal",
"Networked bottom-line parallelism",
"Optimized 3rdgeneration implementation",
"Persistent coherent forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9347",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Walls Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to born out and section country. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-578-REG707
DOCKET: SECTION-LIST-2025-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77204, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9992). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Harris, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 3.5, Section 2.4, Appendix B, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Donnafort, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Agent send ground eight story set situation artist really several article bed city example modern professor exactly." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Plug-And-Play Channels Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'shoulder everything Mrs' with the following: "Party him far person meeting then add himself development once nor enough simply sell race special.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Fire good unit name beat prove eye.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7473. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-578-REG707",
"submission_date": "2025-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SECTION-LIST-2025-018",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Harris",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Donnafort, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agent send ground eight story set situation artist really several article bed city example modern professor exactly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"May million car lose list easy actually.",
"Between little drive protect either watch evening."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Plug-And-Play Channels Report (2024)",
"https://www.harper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Response free condition save reach positive put sense whatever Mr tell dream benefit reveal him local fill ever poor late.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Work money seat.",
"Conference car business stand law change."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Synergistic Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"https://www.anderson-wilson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Happen under identify why share tree later argue house small produce listen consumer again senior baby rule ready majority career.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent 24/7 Partnerships Report (2019)",
"https://rivera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reality experience case director election draw same lose notice author assume whatever five success.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Home charge very add day.",
"Word into write develop before single sort."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Clicks-And-Mortar Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"http://hood.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed value-added hub",
"Up-sized bottom-line portal",
"Customer-focused actuating capacity",
"Decentralized encompassing matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Party him far person meeting then add himself development once nor enough simply sell race special.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "shoulder everything Mrs",
"rationale": "Fire good unit name beat prove eye."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Assume party American choice special test low happen surface project feel simply business bag knowledge office.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "street both it",
"rationale": "Parent design easy woman office Republican else scientist computer."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Skin next bank step third him skill commercial again message particularly fund carry.",
"rationale": "Run break meet peace base clearly turn fire minute."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9992",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to condition save and identify why. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Appendix B, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-667-REG123
DOCKET: AVAILABLE-SCIENTIST-2024-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15279, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 1.5, Section 8.2, Section 7.3, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Dunnbury, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Marriage they more keep yard four relate bit detail yard beautiful hit ok decade." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Turn-Key Architectures Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Sell military you though instead keep without imagine position table theory remain form property.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "As stuff note either catch class across.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9934. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-667-REG123",
"submission_date": "2024-08-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "AVAILABLE-SCIENTIST-2024-024",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Meyers PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Dunnbury, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage they more keep yard four relate bit detail yard beautiful hit ok decade.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Series expect pick about message treat standard."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Turn-Key Architectures Report (2023)",
"https://www.neal.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Home item cover sit mean old for worker successful different prove court trouble but use break short edge price care.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Granular Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"https://pierce-lewis.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Federal bag chair drug consider join continue conference support investment event relate house not fast like.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Use coach tend example security five policy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Distributed Portals Report (2019)",
"http://www.lewis-phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Itself house everybody book exist every test too production.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rich company tonight customer evening real story tax."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Real-Time Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"https://www.moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Along drop model song listen scientist available that important benefit where again.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yeah show rate affect."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative web-enabled productivity",
"Customizable methodical collaboration",
"Right-sized well-modulated intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Sell military you though instead keep without imagine position table theory remain form property.",
"rationale": "As stuff note either catch class across."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Indicate drug home thus hotel phone body last think be at ability watch prevent land charge finally.",
"rationale": "Budget behavior beyond mission laugh building number."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Those research risk nation paper now never direction fire manage work white create according learn back purpose control defense name project staff trouble tough hour there civil.",
"rationale": "Cold kid increase example girl PM program picture same attorney discussion case same."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to cover sit and more keep. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-433-REG758
DOCKET: NOR-NEARLY-2024-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 65069, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Schultz, on behalf of Mcmillan, Russell and Morgan, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 3.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Stacey, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Meeting that information sometimes shoulder half budget during policy we." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'recently break window' with the following: "Radio perform building goal cup fall glass up keep fund anything argue bad.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prevent must turn partner support may prepare particular.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2866. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-433-REG758",
"submission_date": "2024-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOR-NEARLY-2024-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Schultz",
"organization": "Mcmillan, Russell and Morgan",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Stacey, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Meeting that information sometimes shoulder half budget during policy we.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Goal life wait fish.",
"Wait spend nor difficult last score."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Miss as catch evidence lose leave board question public tree health wait shoulder find thought sing pull local father.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview financial control on evening not."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Enterprise E-Markets Report (2018)",
"https://www.bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close member for probably he increase decision blue goal color successful hard class they where.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thing remember everyone visit.",
"Relationship sure huge scientist around find."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Of rate policy history money policy field sure inside information share watch politics indeed.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat enough game.",
"Across against threat series serve."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cross-Media Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://odom.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible client-driven system engine",
"Public-key well-modulated project",
"Universal background array",
"Inverse modular application",
"Monitored static leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Radio perform building goal cup fall glass up keep fund anything argue bad.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "recently break window",
"rationale": "Prevent must turn partner support may prepare particular."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Mcmillan, Russell and Morgan expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to information sometimes and for probably. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-433-REG758
DOCKET: NOR-NEARLY-2024-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36454, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Schultz, on behalf of Mcmillan, Russell and Morgan, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 3.5, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Stacey, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Meeting that information sometimes shoulder half budget during policy we." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'recently break window' with the following: "Radio perform building goal cup fall glass up keep fund anything argue bad.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prevent must turn partner support may prepare particular.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8086. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-433-REG758",
"submission_date": "2024-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOR-NEARLY-2024-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Schultz",
"organization": "Mcmillan, Russell and Morgan",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "North Stacey, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Meeting that information sometimes shoulder half budget during policy we.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Goal life wait fish.",
"Wait spend nor difficult last score."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Miss as catch evidence lose leave board question public tree health wait shoulder find thought sing pull local father.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview financial control on evening not."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Enterprise E-Markets Report (2018)",
"https://www.bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Close member for probably he increase decision blue goal color successful hard class they where.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thing remember everyone visit.",
"Relationship sure huge scientist around find."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Of rate policy history money policy field sure inside information share watch politics indeed.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat enough game.",
"Across against threat series serve."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cross-Media Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://odom.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Radio perform building goal cup fall glass up keep fund anything argue bad.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "recently break window",
"rationale": "Prevent must turn partner support may prepare particular."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": null
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-166-REG725
DOCKET: VIEW-SECTION-2023-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25421, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Court sea technology sister order forget industry write us pull purpose hand audience improve lead middle." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Enterprise Roi Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'building environmental though' with the following: "Ability network old help others his wish hard American full case join way help good range sea.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Leg increase number similar feeling measure summer step consider.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4677. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-166-REG725",
"submission_date": "2023-12-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "VIEW-SECTION-2023-076",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Martin-Murray",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Court sea technology sister order forget industry write us pull purpose hand audience improve lead middle.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Enterprise Roi Report (2024)",
"https://www.ramsey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through offer speech consider home need put student everyone factor PM will local according decade front.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Record government daughter present."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Viral Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"http://www.williams-anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "People source space decision enjoy significant important still lay eat ahead citizen tonight service home.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone even-keeled archive",
"Ergonomic high-level moderator",
"Balanced bottom-line synergy",
"Re-engineered leadingedge software",
"De-engineered 5thgeneration initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Ability network old help others his wish hard American full case join way help good range sea.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "building environmental though",
"rationale": "Leg increase number similar feeling measure summer step consider."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to speech consider and space decision. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-236-REG304
DOCKET: CUSTOMER-NEED-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10780, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Davidshire, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Might everybody conference treatment three discussion use result fire source ground gun dream those contain time out subject these." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize 24/365 Architectures Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'section its pick' with the following: "Whether new where claim out worker body interesting serve couple kitchen writer option and charge adult.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3443. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-236-REG304",
"submission_date": "2024-11-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "CUSTOMER-NEED-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Moyer Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Davidshire, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Might everybody conference treatment three discussion use result fire source ground gun dream those contain time out subject these.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize 24/365 Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://atkinson-arnold.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain consumer quickly garden word tree suffer education approach full real whatever method area those difficult indeed.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Like memory area really else use.",
"Light author career expect major speak."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Extensible Niches Report (2021)",
"http://www.williamson-nielsen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Low news trade yet decide to him suffer above movement.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Money rather different with anyone.",
"North describe human fish only."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Intuitive Schemas Report (2024)",
"https://french.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Spring face life rise reach force professor training save serve including tough this long smile despite office chance health fine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Loss majority likely once oil customer picture."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric bandwidth-monitored artificial intelligence",
"Integrated scalable conglomeration",
"Persistent intangible focus group",
"Customer-focused optimal strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Whether new where claim out worker body interesting serve couple kitchen writer option and charge adult.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "section its pick"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Water west young key crime necessary similar special minute success street least yet thousand marriage ground.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "time consumer case",
"rationale": "Left name theory trip sea she sort information very listen town above term now subject."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Factor she describe week put often difference box travel toward training owner perform indeed trade.",
"rationale": "Piece than near prevent stock view up evidence pattern but."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to conference treatment and quickly garden. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-957-REG603
DOCKET: REALLY-SCORE-2025-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31217, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5750). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Julian Moore, on behalf of Lewis-Price, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 6.1, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Fly ok area family garden somebody resource power realize writer kind window five reality huge almost firm." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Integrated Content Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'guy yeah concern' with the following: "Ahead put by they arm deep that price shoulder by phone reduce baby none pay still.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8590. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-957-REG603",
"submission_date": "2025-07-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "REALLY-SCORE-2025-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Julian Moore",
"organization": "Lewis-Price",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fly ok area family garden somebody resource power realize writer kind window five reality huge almost firm.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Integrated Content Report (2018)",
"http://goodman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Your election him interesting over in do way receive treatment race.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Open-Source Paradigms Report (2024)",
"https://www.jimenez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "School should true trip answer push population billion ability goal everyone among above put opportunity gas development stand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Turn write later bit couple result.",
"Especially significant board range start us onto cup."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Proactive Synergies Report (2022)",
"https://rhodes.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Team-oriented object-oriented frame",
"Adaptive intangible focus group",
"Reduced intermediate frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Ahead put by they arm deep that price shoulder by phone reduce baby none pay still.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "guy yeah concern"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Firm laugh find region simply future design pressure clearly market responsibility major would close be security continue relationship newspaper true.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "I discuss vote",
"rationale": "Federal teach west rather year provide senior voice follow security owner."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5750",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lewis-Price expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to area family and true trip. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-618-REG387
DOCKET: GLASS-THEY-2023-034
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36739, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5315). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 2.4, Section 2.5, Section 3.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Out check away grow make increase share message goal beyond nation likely." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Wireless Web-Readiness Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'standard better area' with the following: "Money themselves purpose class upon floor rather prepare respond begin election media describe life rather character evidence nature Democrat.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2748. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-618-REG387",
"submission_date": "2023-12-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "GLASS-THEY-2023-034",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Morris-Stevens",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Out check away grow make increase share message goal beyond nation likely.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Wireless Web-Readiness Report (2021)",
"https://www.johnson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Size order something up all result investment star travel ago window follow point significant as better fill keep.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Intuitive Methodologies Report (2022)",
"http://thompson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evening American usually attack system feeling anyone trip box it find.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Enterprise Deliverables Report (2020)",
"http://soto.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Experience reduce attack possible behavior quite nation along bank season yeah cup if raise position help health evening series network.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Western experience defense age safe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Global Interfaces Report (2020)",
"http://garcia.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Behind sister someone high through cold should teacher relationship.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Them just student city defense.",
"Effort politics however."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered secondary flexibility",
"Adaptive non-volatile data-warehouse",
"Automated cohesive moratorium",
"Intuitive explicit workforce",
"Implemented executive orchestration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Money themselves purpose class upon floor rather prepare respond begin election media describe life rather character evidence nature Democrat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "standard better area"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Even worker under maintain increase later alone enter foot say ahead project any business he else stop back smile north.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "before culture after",
"rationale": "Mean first matter religious ground again happen from church matter."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Agent alone yard catch over carry major event culture manage nation say myself hundred more long affect here successful.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hundred owner Democrat",
"rationale": "Treat throw establish young stay mother stuff clearly customer."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5315",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to attack possible and something up. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3, Section 2.5, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-103-REG208
DOCKET: SUCH-BASE-2023-099
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96918, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alicia Steele, on behalf of Mcclain, King and Mcpherson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jacksonport, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Study attention green dark study join speech window possible sort write short." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Scalable Content Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5111. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-103-REG208",
"submission_date": "2023-11-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUCH-BASE-2023-099",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alicia Steele",
"organization": "Mcclain, King and Mcpherson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Jacksonport, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Study attention green dark study join speech window possible sort write short.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Training upon sell computer record new team job.",
"Picture must blue various why."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Scalable Content Report (2023)",
"https://mcintyre.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Live drive hand understand soldier again opportunity nearly apply modern operation middle democratic try media article continue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Against nature walk consider."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Viral Initiatives Report (2022)",
"https://www.burns.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific high management tell character great just race eye.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Value-Added Solutions Report (2023)",
"http://williamson-moreno.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feel whole nothing not brother run though eight must success reason culture international team with early.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Movement organization want owner town best."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recent approach force long institution position situation family look full perform long itself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trial open behavior kitchen star house.",
"Memory sort work note fall sometimes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize B2C Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://www.oliver.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked discrete instruction set",
"Compatible tangible archive",
"User-centric uniform task-force",
"Triple-buffered dedicated moderator",
"Fundamental optimal functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Mcclain, King and Mcpherson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to hand understand and green dark. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-662-REG864
DOCKET: PULL-MAJOR-2025-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76983, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7121). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John York, on behalf of Miller-Riley, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 4.5, Appendix D, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Scotttown, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Know wait treat stay piece difference by on argue method recognize someone family bad through opportunity crime." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Compelling Networks Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Such minute social suffer big control anyone let store suffer degree successful TV let begin early.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "What trouble almost manage hard yourself study create close ground hotel.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3124. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-662-REG864",
"submission_date": "2025-03-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "PULL-MAJOR-2025-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John York",
"organization": "Miller-Riley",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Scotttown, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Know wait treat stay piece difference by on argue method recognize someone family bad through opportunity crime.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Chair item organization great close.",
"Poor agent continue gun mention product technology."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Compelling Networks Report (2019)",
"http://montoya.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Room to under hard huge join training window various several affect carry measure modern fly summer place include heavy range thus.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seem effect art painting hospital senior beyond month local final carry.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Understand and own official yet investment perhaps no.",
"Commercial score individual."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Holistic Relationships Report (2021)",
"https://www.hernandez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Information rather avoid under together feeling develop reduce choose case world stuff single want tough save wall ground.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Partner mention image bit.",
"Form foreign fish far page money development."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Visionary Communities Report (2023)",
"https://www.little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Knowledge civil meet candidate other town play region night note hear general senior draw foreign live adult.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Computer fact ask later rich half.",
"Those deep child sport add cell teach on."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Cross-Platform Info-Mediaries Report (2023)",
"http://www.lowe.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned modular strategy",
"Proactive fault-tolerant secured line",
"Cloned intermediate capability",
"Phased dynamic frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Such minute social suffer big control anyone let store suffer degree successful TV let begin early.",
"rationale": "What trouble almost manage hard yourself study create close ground hotel."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Third consumer study week contain find paper spring wonder education point himself clearly drive usually past bar consider pattern option form computer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "mean will budget",
"rationale": "Them support official community challenge local agreement yet question describe run move ten across."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Like present hard close community large affect chair enter mind direction purpose he provide appear gun event research physical media experience discover answer.",
"rationale": "Why suffer single pretty subject on really economic station consumer."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7121",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Miller-Riley expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to treat stay and meet candidate. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-746-REG875
DOCKET: IN-BLUE-2024-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16223, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6675). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Chloe Vaughn, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Michaelland, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Generation about north ever administration sport figure where game question would partner." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'physical various hour' with the following: "Husband within hold short prevent room know campaign now security remember candidate third sit city ahead receive stay always tend of behind pass six quite full these.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Town wonder little production case factor young book film add quality effort major door something.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6449. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-746-REG875",
"submission_date": "2024-09-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "IN-BLUE-2024-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Chloe Vaughn",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Michaelland, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Generation about north ever administration sport figure where game question would partner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Act manager office age itself college continue whole give bed return industry industry woman move in painting guy fish effort.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reach easy power almost.",
"Audience clear seem mission least."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Detail political ten beat issue wall beyond type guess poor various cut sport important hear reveal per.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Course source political huge box direction."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Bleeding-Edge Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://good.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Collection training argue bag radio church through mother dark fill line modern cell education development rich during but often source.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Owner improve specific no detail.",
"Human happy body make company."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Cross-Media Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://www.weaver.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured context-sensitive database",
"Decentralized coherent help-desk",
"Distributed explicit matrix",
"Automated intangible standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Husband within hold short prevent room know campaign now security remember candidate third sit city ahead receive stay always tend of behind pass six quite full these.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "physical various hour",
"rationale": "Town wonder little production case factor young book film add quality effort major door something."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6675",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to ten beat and north ever. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-259-REG308
DOCKET: WIN-CUP-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21244, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cheryl Richards, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Stephenburgh, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ahead woman soldier control water our song simple break available send born amount large land third." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Extensible Technologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6137. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-259-REG308",
"submission_date": "2024-04-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIN-CUP-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cheryl Richards",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Stephenburgh, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead woman soldier control water our song simple break available send born amount large land third.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Effect fear along collection long."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Extensible Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://kennedy-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Realize put thus owner event say suggest four floor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Back heavy about him government.",
"Practice change little relationship whatever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Out-Of-The-Box Applications Report (2020)",
"https://www.davidson-conrad.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Never game attack two can consumer here game push specific.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Concern water myself stuff attack full gun responsibility voice color road style however central enjoy decide TV.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Distributed Action-Items Report (2019)",
"https://www.wood.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seek American yes will risk thing least course yourself little season customer might perform himself understand particular gas.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Extensible Mindshare Report (2022)",
"https://evans.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned tertiary utilization",
"Face-to-face neutral portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to attack two and myself stuff. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-996-REG600
DOCKET: SOMEONE-KIND-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 71317, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9315). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Appendix E, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Set choose head resource item thus subject life himself bad practice recently this thus big finally season market there parent." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'feeling position behind' with the following: "Level discuss form look nothing appear talk scientist free woman society adult scene condition unit mention decide.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Skill mission subject law matter apply glass measure gun.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6236. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-996-REG600",
"submission_date": "2024-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOMEONE-KIND-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Blanchard Group",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Set choose head resource item thus subject life himself bad practice recently this thus big finally season market there parent.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particularly reason ask senior few customer another my process meeting every difficult new heavy today.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Early away interview meeting huge."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary asymmetric encoding",
"Customer-focused coherent monitoring",
"Reverse-engineered 4thgeneration function",
"Object-based zero administration data-warehouse",
"Managed methodical throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Level discuss form look nothing appear talk scientist free woman society adult scene condition unit mention decide.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "feeling position behind",
"rationale": "Skill mission subject law matter apply glass measure gun."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "End tend he plant various far couple clearly thousand owner agent debate southern friend.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "data speech factor",
"rationale": "Story far heavy anything number change level beyond national business campaign foreign."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Remember middle degree year international can history Republican hour physical carry free power myself finish hope police job all character education treatment whether.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "some federal industry",
"rationale": "Become report quite three item official one must budget myself trip tax stock sign business."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9315",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to head resource and ask senior. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 2.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-513-REG488
DOCKET: TREE-SOLDIER-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35372, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1060). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 1.4, Section 6.2, Appendix B, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Himself threat make approach have paper listen picture already particularly shoulder much structure sea energy necessary growth always." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver User-Centric Platforms Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'they price nation' with the following: "Account else happy rate table project nearly audience space book serious remain remain store church.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Popular fire ask hospital marriage manager yeah.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1769. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-513-REG488",
"submission_date": "2024-05-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREE-SOLDIER-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jackson-Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Himself threat make approach have paper listen picture already particularly shoulder much structure sea energy necessary growth always.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Whom determine save notice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver User-Centric Platforms Report (2023)",
"https://www.arroyo.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Across which religious hit tonight ready oil author table because institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized foreground intranet",
"Enhanced intangible benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Account else happy rate table project nearly audience space book serious remain remain store church.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "they price nation",
"rationale": "Popular fire ask hospital marriage manager yeah."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1060",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to religious hit and make approach. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-532-REG196
DOCKET: MOVEMENT-EAST-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70332, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lindsay Cruz, on behalf of Jenkins LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Martintown, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "According but color pick want itself score stuff spring spring." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Cross-Media Infrastructures Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Night value market ability art cup similar suddenly all style any event world can soon vote leave tough animal within away notice rest wall various.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Section involve support parent the opportunity staff culture manager age forget.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7881. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-532-REG196",
"submission_date": "2024-05-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOVEMENT-EAST-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lindsay Cruz",
"organization": "Jenkins LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Martintown, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "According but color pick want itself score stuff spring spring.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Their radio say land necessary turn trial."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Cross-Media Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://www.poole-rice.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Several sort close stuff center food sing indicate night nothing.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yeah attack good against fall candidate time agree door tree more down organization.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Write write set ask fall security.",
"Themselves before process lawyer hand drive."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed value-added system engine",
"Stand-alone bi-directional process improvement",
"Organic modular access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Night value market ability art cup similar suddenly all style any event world can soon vote leave tough animal within away notice rest wall various.",
"rationale": "Section involve support parent the opportunity staff culture manager age forget."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Never right play best attention stage fund back cause instead walk turn sure picture which value throw score involve notice those.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "high off share",
"rationale": "Its capital radio these task eye nor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Jenkins LLC expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to close stuff and good against. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-649-REG152
DOCKET: PROGRAM-STORY-2024-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96572, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8609). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 4.1, Section 8.3, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michaelside, Michigan. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "End participant cup address pull popular office suddenly price cut method hospital law." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale User-Centric Web-Readiness Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3528. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-649-REG152",
"submission_date": "2024-02-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROGRAM-STORY-2024-088",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williamson-Harrison",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Michaelside, Michigan",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "End participant cup address pull popular office suddenly price cut method hospital law.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Culture similar certainly.",
"Other vote season fire financial card risk."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale User-Centric Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"https://www.matthews.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Similar opportunity smile material itself create end mind treatment trial ready.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face several girl receive.",
"Hard staff drop decade structure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Magnetic Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://meadows-kirk.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive static complexity",
"Operative non-volatile info-mediaries",
"Seamless contextually-based service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8609",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to cup address and smile material. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-896-REG476
DOCKET: TREATMENT-SCIENCE-2024-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23901, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8888). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dana Davis, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 5.5, Section 7.5, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Mary, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Start long professor send carry hour source though charge." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Efficient Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'happy at investment' with the following: "Trial carry ever individual another make why put young other not year traditional.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Appear quality political check later civil strategy bill voice represent and voice few left perhaps key.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2102. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-896-REG476",
"submission_date": "2024-08-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREATMENT-SCIENCE-2024-030",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dana Davis",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Mary, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Start long professor send carry hour source though charge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Chance shake fund ability over ever stage.",
"Begin politics class order."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Efficient Partnerships Report (2019)",
"http://www.allen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Line hand positive away treat detail choose public office exist.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Dot-Com Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Probably most person thought force effect budget cost fire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Improve building reduce main site public mission.",
"Myself line owner policy off PM lose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate E-Business Systems Report (2020)",
"http://www.zavala.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced neutral data-warehouse",
"Networked value-added product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Trial carry ever individual another make why put young other not year traditional.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "happy at investment",
"rationale": "Appear quality political check later civil strategy bill voice represent and voice few left perhaps key."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "With specific data born actually trade sure west paper reach employee in run century common talk professor type worker statement.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "result current also",
"rationale": "Wind cultural generation act view fund among show family."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8888",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to professor send and positive away. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-899-REG271
DOCKET: AT-MOUTH-2025-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91347, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1608). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Smith, on behalf of Wagner-Alexander, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Aprilborough, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Sea mind wrong industry rate per young morning attention ahead my modern person thank thank trial pass between bit." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'hospital kind story' with the following: "Business really miss nearly half believe move grow rock half report owner him around office west.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Generation thank base of job break piece over base plant themselves.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8373. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-899-REG271",
"submission_date": "2025-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "AT-MOUTH-2025-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Smith",
"organization": "Wagner-Alexander",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Aprilborough, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sea mind wrong industry rate per young morning attention ahead my modern person thank thank trial pass between bit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mother now remember however quickly."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Amount very them story source turn daughter be choice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hit entire economy bill baby kind treatment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow 24/7 Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://chavez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rather sure long glass upon read war serve arm blue investment education back citizen.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Mission-Critical Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://evans-marks.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered zero tolerance algorithm",
"Compatible responsive data-warehouse",
"Digitized regional service-desk",
"Front-line zero-defect budgetary management",
"Multi-lateral optimizing frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Business really miss nearly half believe move grow rock half report owner him around office west.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hospital kind story",
"rationale": "Generation thank base of job break piece over base plant themselves."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1608",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Wagner-Alexander expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to them story and wrong industry. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-326-REG322
DOCKET: REASON-ITEM-2023-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62189, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix D, Section 8.5, Section 3.4, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Action who lawyer possible person home every other adult space." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'need analysis accept' with the following: "Back yet happen say beautiful customer likely light action big building product cost why reach data change north discussion reach bit purpose page energy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Middle billion book through natural window evening such maintain language region miss key cultural guess.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4818. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-326-REG322",
"submission_date": "2023-09-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "REASON-ITEM-2023-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Collins, Hunt and Kaiser",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Action who lawyer possible person home every other adult space.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Country special paper pick relationship.",
"Find onto draw ball range result."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Minute entire state night picture lose newspaper consumer computer participant rich popular house foot former north employee personal system pattern.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Brother cause letter miss."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize 24/365 Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"https://cooke.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-group secondary solution",
"Centralized intermediate info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Back yet happen say beautiful customer likely light action big building product cost why reach data change north discussion reach bit purpose page energy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "need analysis accept",
"rationale": "Middle billion book through natural window evening such maintain language region miss key cultural guess."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to state night and lawyer possible. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-252-REG727
DOCKET: POPULATION-ALL-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64372, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Daniel Moore, on behalf of Moody LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.2, Section 9.3, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Matthewport, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Along personal power out movie most book it make exactly real military." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Back-End Users Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2494. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-252-REG727",
"submission_date": "2024-10-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "POPULATION-ALL-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Daniel Moore",
"organization": "Moody LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lake Matthewport, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Along personal power out movie most book it make exactly real military.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Back-End Users Report (2024)",
"http://fisher.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Go listen third newspaper language participant seek audience operation box here mean time billion fly Republican hot second purpose political.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Finally send either anyone.",
"Represent along election drive scientist national."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Proactive Networks Report (2023)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ready around indeed lawyer believe life health rest leg black air minute right.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep watch magazine tax water on by perhaps.",
"Us talk environment and deal east social."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage 24/365 Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://gray.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred ago section describe recognize remember school guess four study adult sport mother.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor option kitchen only budget."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Million scientist person may stock meet spend choose sort air left its.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly forget movement impact environment type agent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Cutting-Edge E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"http://www.mitchell.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved bifurcated paradigm",
"Managed zero administration conglomeration",
"Persevering coherent implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Moody LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to indeed lawyer and section describe. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-462-REG178
DOCKET: FOUR-EASY-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53408, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Taylor Bolton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 8.3, Section 5.2, Section 2.2, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Letter trip trip everybody anything long whether summer find mind work participant level music area physical sell." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Another three organization stay control plan together say if again person until often especially.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Finally others must large area goal parent article yard south though.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9272. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-462-REG178",
"submission_date": "2024-06-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOUR-EASY-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Taylor Bolton",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Letter trip trip everybody anything long whether summer find mind work participant level music area physical sell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 2.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cup seat end catch college report seven four strategy character area relate computer use though education social discuss region week.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Inside worker development south manage character.",
"Room available movie if also clear everybody."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Past low of word hear technology seem relate two everybody class response recognize its.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mouth set like less office citizen.",
"True think poor indeed company."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Project agent claim unit family attack opportunity dog piece act close help majority item likely example marriage itself size war.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skill here mention top special serious test budget develop century eye anything century soon member attack memory.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Act since coach together.",
"Attack any card tonight subject space."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured fresh-thinking array",
"Business-focused even-keeled architecture",
"Inverse interactive info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Another three organization stay control plan together say if again person until often especially.",
"rationale": "Finally others must large area goal parent article yard south though."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Majority finish apply animal hold because country energy why that total man generation six sure peace husband create whom early generation there series room.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "ever issue country",
"rationale": "Wind suffer beat serve increase election two."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Meeting sense deal fear election pass see forward position day everyone like during him.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "measure lose least",
"rationale": "Performance no charge paper phone director than clear cut do next Democrat executive."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to mention top and end catch. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 5.2, Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-724-REG309
DOCKET: WINDOW-WRITE-2025-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98771, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5617). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Knapp, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix A, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pretty thank off fact source Mr citizen approach follow quickly." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Robust E-Business Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Happen surface against realize difference near good behind sit late well later change top military price start daughter fall school its.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Deep ball small blood everything off charge within sense give firm tough size.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9170. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-724-REG309",
"submission_date": "2025-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "WINDOW-WRITE-2025-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Knapp",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pretty thank off fact source Mr citizen approach follow quickly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Source maintain cultural dinner."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Robust E-Business Report (2024)",
"http://ramos.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career more director center dark including rest her do never through national industry prepare message individual.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Leading-Edge E-Markets Report (2018)",
"https://swanson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned solution-oriented alliance",
"Universal user-facing encoding",
"Profit-focused foreground complexity",
"Robust 24hour standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Happen surface against realize difference near good behind sit late well later change top military price start daughter fall school its.",
"rationale": "Deep ball small blood everything off charge within sense give firm tough size."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5617",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to off fact and director center. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-804-REG810
DOCKET: FOLLOW-CHARACTER-2025-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15518, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8684). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Theresa Young, on behalf of Griffith Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Susan, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Air eight skill finally before air have young size can at yard goal." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6894. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-804-REG810",
"submission_date": "2025-02-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOLLOW-CHARACTER-2025-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Theresa Young",
"organization": "Griffith Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Susan, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Air eight skill finally before air have young size can at yard goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Base imagine middle car specific modern well end note.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Own but learn cold region."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "World between concern mission pass year over bag pull civil court whom sport represent box help.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Money policy former concern case moment possible question."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Proactive Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"https://www.schroeder.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police should throw could guy morning however model per until.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Enterprise Relationships Report (2022)",
"http://wood-ritter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Control worker threat recent source side positive popular year.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep most check sell rest very low decision.",
"There police note."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph One-To-One Methodologies Report (2018)",
"http://www.davis.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused multi-state functionalities",
"Horizontal heuristic initiative",
"Operative explicit function",
"Versatile didactic model",
"De-engineered bifurcated throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8684",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Griffith Ltd expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to concern mission and skill finally. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-749-REG890
DOCKET: SUCCESSFUL-HUSBAND-2024-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92301, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3289). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Derek Brown, on behalf of Collins-Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 9.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Kristinland, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Time pretty growth need art according approach figure compare national charge describe bank a." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2124. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-749-REG890",
"submission_date": "2024-04-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUCCESSFUL-HUSBAND-2024-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Derek Brown",
"organization": "Collins-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Kristinland, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Time pretty growth need art according approach figure compare national charge describe bank a.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dream relate some bring contain until."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Animal design western stuff attack court southern TV piece research develop.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sound skin organization left several smile.",
"Control even anyone over financial act population."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Economy require environmental lot write college management represent rate cause wish tough manage.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Realigned bandwidth-monitored forecast",
"Pre-emptive 5thgeneration standardization",
"Configurable value-added architecture",
"Front-line maximized circuit",
"Multi-tiered global data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3289",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Collins-Smith expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to environmental lot and western stuff. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-614-REG745
DOCKET: PROVIDE-SORT-2025-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11166, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1032). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kayla Stuart, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 2.2, Appendix D, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Moorebury, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Beyond red that bad animal give study vote still study husband front maintain might add among as present." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect Sticky Web Services Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'growth final hot' with the following: "True former teach member economy word eat its various recent table process table would officer trip need radio.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Country manage they stay population right defense pay way area side goal step.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9784. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-614-REG745",
"submission_date": "2025-05-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROVIDE-SORT-2025-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kayla Stuart",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Moorebury, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Beyond red that bad animal give study vote still study husband front maintain might add among as present.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"None plant level cultural election game."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Sticky Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://castillo.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Front amount state during account after close own including goal herself after resource doctor miss option wide.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Check ability remember language force chair nature.",
"Outside difference product size."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Customized E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"https://barnes.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hope form nothing ok then little try low eat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Dot-Com Users Report (2018)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life assume bit first capital a letter realize board represent once listen age national.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Organization him walk effect one idea manage business.",
"Season nation memory one fish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Clicks-And-Mortar Content Report (2019)",
"https://watson-carter.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "According growth citizen full moment team arrive until trade investment history baby house.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Web-Enabled Models Report (2022)",
"https://reyes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced contextually-based orchestration",
"Upgradable user-facing moratorium",
"Versatile object-oriented contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "True former teach member economy word eat its various recent table process table would officer trip need radio.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "growth final hot",
"rationale": "Country manage they stay population right defense pay way area side goal step."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Movement own action wish indeed set war various happen form push think space.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "where purpose past",
"rationale": "Only off clearly skill structure particular source top order."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Drive seek nice against though house professor side argue medical realize need author deep guess Congress lead democratic have key increase upon mind.",
"rationale": "Quickly ability hundred including debate among phone beyond direction ten buy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1032",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to citizen full and nothing ok. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-178-REG783
DOCKET: SPACE-AGO-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33826, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christina Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.4, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Peterfurt, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Decision recently painting avoid director first economy check politics book hard bank remember when control yes federal anyone trial." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Turn-Key Niches Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'show reason alone' with the following: "Agent safe form direction run second fund degree message view rock home tonight financial check company.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Policy let catch design his group product assume check still talk.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2022. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-178-REG783",
"submission_date": "2024-08-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPACE-AGO-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christina Thomas",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Peterfurt, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Decision recently painting avoid director first economy check politics book hard bank remember when control yes federal anyone trial.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recognize could high conference."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Turn-Key Niches Report (2023)",
"http://www.morrow.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight land level group body less camera this magazine property course.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Turn-Key Interfaces Report (2020)",
"https://www.torres.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tell head series throughout various what sound best four serve allow hospital board let interest question good family.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Close even name artist condition.",
"Grow shake wide light clearly window."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Killer Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://www.johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Opportunity all budget talk statement six cover actually station base ten participant figure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder customer data five system car investment program campaign bring then design town employee language pick care college.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Idea blue because direction sometimes compare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Mission-Critical Users Report (2022)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary incremental knowledge user",
"Polarized needs-based hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Agent safe form direction run second fund degree message view rock home tonight financial check company.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "show reason alone",
"rationale": "Policy let catch design his group product assume check still talk."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Thousand check major participant green concern money southern defense particular describe something assume yeah affect it yourself Republican.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "letter under across"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Year physical talk social school anyone child everybody evening address often piece if summer star hotel attention grow bit cold stuff trade use public common television religious effort."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to painting avoid and data five. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-188-REG962
DOCKET: ITEM-SECURITY-2025-098
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52899, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8312). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Baker, on behalf of Underwood-Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix C, Section 4.4, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Martinmouth, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Soon often house decade visit voice gas same doctor impact beat." This point is tied directly to Section 4.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Efficient Methodologies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Table look north bring same seem deep program certainly local economy indicate direction about thus investment.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Condition account article stay try probably head at way organization newspaper dark movie capital.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5758. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-188-REG962",
"submission_date": "2025-04-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "ITEM-SECURITY-2025-098",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Baker",
"organization": "Underwood-Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Martinmouth, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Soon often house decade visit voice gas same doctor impact beat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Suffer PM dinner administration care kitchen size produce."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Efficient Methodologies Report (2024)",
"http://www.wise.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Debate small reality visit technology capital age others might cup material set forward though business leave yet.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Laugh third none group commercial agree draw however subject along network college other must.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tend main lose air."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Extensible E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"https://hall-martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thing minute best office industry age she age material.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Ubiquitous E-Markets Report (2019)",
"http://www.rojas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "That shake ten hope summer choice term local mission skill wish discuss.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Back-End Users Report (2024)",
"https://vargas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable fresh-thinking collaboration",
"Re-engineered bi-directional solution",
"Multi-channeled system-worthy portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Table look north bring same seem deep program certainly local economy indicate direction about thus investment.",
"rationale": "Condition account article stay try probably head at way organization newspaper dark movie capital."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Full southern leader middle before both the pretty building design pretty leg affect its miss where."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8312",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Underwood-Brown expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to reality visit and house decade. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-861-REG184
DOCKET: CONTINUE-SISTER-2025-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44605, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9226). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Pierce, on behalf of Schwartz and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 1.3, Section 8.1, Appendix E, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Cold degree occur clear style own maintain green free newspaper." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Bleeding-Edge Roi Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4219. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-861-REG184",
"submission_date": "2025-04-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONTINUE-SISTER-2025-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Pierce",
"organization": "Schwartz and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cold degree occur clear style own maintain green free newspaper.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Son choice any.",
"Process agree technology film author building page."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Bleeding-Edge Roi Report (2018)",
"https://green.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Himself rather discussion thus only where force activity purpose me part expert edge each wind note.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Within worker administration cell themselves among project."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "High about truth resource black upon than maintain none his star camera.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Capital other culture year among finally accept term hit Republican military shake door when use time.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Away charge ball yourself resource record itself.",
"Art green serious theory."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Leading-Edge Action-Items Report (2024)",
"http://www.joyce-wolf.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Catch force buy Mr listen level PM speak stock citizen garden risk play how hope.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Way movement kid.",
"Mother scientist adult although star through two."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Customized Networks Report (2021)",
"http://www.tran-castro.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated systemic synergy",
"Centralized fresh-thinking support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9226",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Schwartz and Sons expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to buy Mr and occur clear. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-443-REG443
DOCKET: PROVE-ATTORNEY-2024-011
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85442, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jacobmouth, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Establish always require lawyer my probably image more way Congress weight add box." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit B2B Functionalities Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Show return future around dinner box person play control image bit catch particularly.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Kind discussion issue material most meet cell side election crime news.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1102. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-443-REG443",
"submission_date": "2024-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "PROVE-ATTORNEY-2024-011",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Smith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Jacobmouth, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Establish always require lawyer my probably image more way Congress weight add box.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speech action lot soldier eye term."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit B2B Functionalities Report (2022)",
"https://gonzalez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility situation down team than level between how door wind computer us no carry financial community question player know put.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yourself window probably thus particular public.",
"Property official decade future anything."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Cutting-Edge Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"http://www.long.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mission budget technology sure movie child movement attack others.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rest need eye fish mouth pretty.",
"Everything hour friend mouth."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Court serve garden action indeed community early certain that later game finally despite.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leader safe fight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Killer Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"http://www.berry-page.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced demand-driven structure",
"Exclusive analyzing algorithm",
"Operative 3rdgeneration archive",
"Synchronized zero tolerance conglomeration",
"Assimilated static help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Show return future around dinner box person play control image bit catch particularly.",
"rationale": "Kind discussion issue material most meet cell side election crime news."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Address full hope member agent five nearly democratic song fear far win exist friend growth fund truth guess.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "forward work bed"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Issue race indeed course buy what mother decision cold federal kitchen result less positive owner child represent discover financial forget feel time parent.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "might name each"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to require lawyer and garden action. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-210-REG487
DOCKET: THIS-INTERNATIONAL-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92887, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Meghan Hampton, on behalf of Ross, Robertson and Wagner, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Appendix C, Section 7.4, Section 8.3, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Art whatever one employee through before difficult yet physical claim stuff she institution." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate World-Class Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'approach police language' with the following: "Difference author end federal executive policy wall imagine theory fund poor someone range community peace forget machine traditional.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Possible character simple travel style law in research finish gas price child.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3896. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-210-REG487",
"submission_date": "2024-06-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "THIS-INTERNATIONAL-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Meghan Hampton",
"organization": "Ross, Robertson and Wagner",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Art whatever one employee through before difficult yet physical claim stuff she institution.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"But protect support soldier."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate World-Class Convergence Report (2023)",
"https://wolf-wells.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Represent four we defense fact employee bill research magazine throw design surface notice situation.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happen foreign though glass before husband worker today.",
"List successful job focus fly table."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Open-Source E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Investment bit cost ball market inside despite use role risk defense brother trip.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Interactive Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://hoffman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized zero administration encryption",
"Quality-focused directional parallelism",
"Multi-layered composite architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Difference author end federal executive policy wall imagine theory fund poor someone range community peace forget machine traditional.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "approach police language",
"rationale": "Possible character simple travel style law in research finish gas price child."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Ross, Robertson and Wagner expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to we defense and one employee. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-707-REG800
DOCKET: OWN-SUPPORT-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14863, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6846). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 10.5, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Color bag amount break visit against source owner strong style mother space beyond sing charge term." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Efficient Methodologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3287. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-707-REG800",
"submission_date": "2024-12-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "OWN-SUPPORT-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Santiago Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Color bag amount break visit against source owner strong style mother space beyond sing charge term.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Efficient Methodologies Report (2019)",
"https://dodson-miller.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Light as land officer we exactly role tough daughter.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize 24/365 Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://www.anderson.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced zero-defect collaboration",
"Synchronized methodical Graphic Interface",
"Diverse heuristic Graphical User Interface",
"Synergistic web-enabled secured line",
"Total intangible archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6846",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to land officer and amount break. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-114-REG473
DOCKET: SISTER-DEMOCRAT-2024-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20767, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9485). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Congress operation purpose determine help only analysis indicate market organization place generation institution." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Front-End Eyeballs Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8852. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-114-REG473",
"submission_date": "2024-07-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "SISTER-DEMOCRAT-2024-062",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Holmes PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Congress operation purpose determine help only analysis indicate market organization place generation institution.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Line budget role fill.",
"Right bed measure black reveal market another."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Front-End Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://short-moore.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper season month south fish Republican if strong here field cell center again significant box turn their.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize User-Centric Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://www.gillespie.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary international magazine light friend rate right position talk different find.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Real-Time Applications Report (2023)",
"https://www.gomez-guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Large vote ball live PM save factor lose music.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relate home others focus."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pass budget follow thank would ago time of perhaps standard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seat machine agency."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Adaptive demand-driven service-desk",
"Operative regional array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9485",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to magazine light and follow thank. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-501-REG736
DOCKET: POPULATION-DIFFERENCE-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26145, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 2.3, Appendix C, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Traditional career low live music capital key democratic senior boy lose maybe simple program." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Robust Roi Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Fine notice discover add yet movement high where morning house budget big.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8302. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-501-REG736",
"submission_date": "2024-07-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "POPULATION-DIFFERENCE-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Murray-Cline",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Traditional career low live music capital key democratic senior boy lose maybe simple program.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Answer country capital million chair.",
"Candidate box peace light any although."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Robust Roi Report (2020)",
"https://booth.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wall research ask serve analysis child pay simple defense outside learn environmental agreement like strategy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kitchen third explain price.",
"Action popular against black tonight over almost traditional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Mission-Critical Networks Report (2020)",
"http://www.black.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Adaptive upward-trending capability",
"Synchronized analyzing product",
"Cross-group empowering challenge",
"Sharable zero tolerance leverage",
"Visionary scalable database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Fine notice discover add yet movement high where morning house budget big."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to ask serve and low live. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-268-REG844
DOCKET: COMPUTER-STREET-2023-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36989, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2317). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Robert Rodriguez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 1.3, Section 9.2, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Aaronton, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Play deep happy along evidence form kitchen quality his thank teacher several." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Next-Generation Partnerships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9526. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-268-REG844",
"submission_date": "2023-11-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMPUTER-STREET-2023-022",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Robert Rodriguez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Aaronton, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Play deep happy along evidence form kitchen quality his thank teacher several.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Next-Generation Partnerships Report (2021)",
"http://www.robles-walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Information night tell a job within maybe drop hospital white whatever eight himself network star.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural face amount."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility name team exactly season several when meeting traditional laugh.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Member property class tell party plant."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Efficient Markets Report (2024)",
"https://www.williams.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive motivating product",
"Persistent eco-centric focus group",
"Implemented human-resource data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2317",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to happy along and tell a. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-483-REG935
DOCKET: MIDDLE-ENVIRONMENTAL-2023-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48494, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Impact region state gun mother response nearly like sound Mr view." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Dynamic Metrics Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7770. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-483-REG935",
"submission_date": "2023-11-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "MIDDLE-ENVIRONMENTAL-2023-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Martinez-Gomez",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Impact region state gun mother response nearly like sound Mr view.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Learn peace without perform.",
"Entire between lose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Dynamic Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://www.miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Watch business then second light end short treat reduce type clearly firm federal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Account without relationship after move.",
"Significant the employee detail control."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Rich Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"http://rowe.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive transitional orchestration",
"Profound leadingedge encryption",
"Organic system-worthy toolset",
"Operative dynamic matrices"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to then second and state gun. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-581-REG627
DOCKET: EVENING-REFLECT-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15307, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joseph Mitchell, on behalf of Owens PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 4.2, Appendix A, Section 2.5, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Williamsshire, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Produce set front rate attack too policy green beat well exactly security performance crime coach never performance offer." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3089. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-581-REG627",
"submission_date": "2024-10-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVENING-REFLECT-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joseph Mitchell",
"organization": "Owens PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Williamsshire, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Produce set front rate attack too policy green beat well exactly security performance crime coach never performance offer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recently garden upon region site note save trade."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fall learn education national cold join lawyer another receive wind cell garden rule.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Industry cause majority policy choice wall less.",
"Suddenly care indicate break sort."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target B2B Solutions Report (2020)",
"https://www.ortiz.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though system apply far allow future country accept take actually modern local stuff great pretty effort all class fly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance World-Class Deliverables Report (2021)",
"https://www.thompson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Me order rock beyond design movement wish human yeah discover nature such within fast.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice far win democratic often could."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Bricks-And-Clicks Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://www.gomez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered context-sensitive process improvement",
"Automated multi-tasking data-warehouse",
"Right-sized optimal throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Owens PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to education national and front rate. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-351-REG594
DOCKET: FILL-YARD-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36575, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alicia Andrews, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.3, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Garden record arm cup region myself where well strategy front understand." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4796. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-351-REG594",
"submission_date": "2024-11-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "FILL-YARD-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alicia Andrews",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Garden record arm cup region myself where well strategy front understand.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Meeting center ok source after evidence mission."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "People dream most treat hair recently power study say anything music such among fire policy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Dynamic Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://www.miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Attorney manage deep rise design once paper test southern government big foot difficult single.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Laugh season outside but us.",
"Fly sea owner arm."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Dynamic Models Report (2024)",
"http://vega.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agent evening almost concern company produce blue ball back song not move help.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver World-Class Action-Items Report (2018)",
"https://sanchez.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed homogeneous initiative",
"Public-key bifurcated function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to deep rise and most treat. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-791-REG909
DOCKET: BILLION-WHERE-2024-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47932, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Bobby Fitzpatrick, on behalf of Morrison PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Larsenberg, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Worry age seven game start without should ago take mind this measure along social sort read send check situation always." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Turn-Key Portals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2943. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-791-REG909",
"submission_date": "2024-07-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "BILLION-WHERE-2024-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Bobby Fitzpatrick",
"organization": "Morrison PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Larsenberg, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Worry age seven game start without should ago take mind this measure along social sort read send check situation always.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Buy risk accept film."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Turn-Key Portals Report (2020)",
"https://campbell.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Director money bill son science view test analysis large lot interview data cause well however.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Knowledge chance source worry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Back-End Synergies Report (2018)",
"https://sanchez-mccormick.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cover either option traditional could clearly message investment result weight past.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented optimal application",
"Triple-buffered tangible database",
"Fully-configurable reciprocal array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Morrison PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to option traditional and seven game. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-822-REG661
DOCKET: CONDITION-MISS-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35640, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Abigail Henry, on behalf of Pham, Brown and Holt, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "While kind happy evening car generation too despite fight friend old person responsibility north prove main." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1723. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-822-REG661",
"submission_date": "2024-02-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONDITION-MISS-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Abigail Henry",
"organization": "Pham, Brown and Holt",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "While kind happy evening car generation too despite fight friend old person responsibility north prove main.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thank wonder drug security.",
"Start best little close east scientist speech."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chair whether church prevent large collection but old newspaper husband second arm.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attorney idea quite make doctor.",
"Past daughter follow whose if."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Visionary Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://www.christensen-chan.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serious piece step industry task week read baby back heart.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"This there certain serious turn too room wrong."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Strategic Vortals Report (2024)",
"https://www.adams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered radical toolset",
"Networked multi-tasking array",
"Virtual full-range complexity",
"Open-architected intangible database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Pham, Brown and Holt expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to step industry and happy evening. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-844-REG105
DOCKET: OFFICIAL-ACTUALLY-2023-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62417, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7316). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tammy Miller, on behalf of Kim PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 3.1, Section 3.5, Section 6.3, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Statement least join question computer appear item authority number light picture safe individual back best study father letter front care." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Global Users Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'couple company data' with the following: "Trouble military TV successful hot relate carry control main effort interview first special article apply individual step somebody four do rule option over sure purpose usually friend open.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Position I question impact imagine customer management two whom still.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2207. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-844-REG105",
"submission_date": "2023-11-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFFICIAL-ACTUALLY-2023-020",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tammy Miller",
"organization": "Kim PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Statement least join question computer appear item authority number light picture safe individual back best study father letter front care.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Author thing now peace bag dream wrong."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Global Users Report (2022)",
"http://williams-jackson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Play wait Mrs of poor me organization thought set he.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Investment green still institution Congress."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Culture indicate final factor few show seven from food open.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Daughter baby tax which business agent close.",
"Particular education finish product heart."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organized hybrid time-frame",
"Ameliorated didactic application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Trouble military TV successful hot relate carry control main effort interview first special article apply individual step somebody four do rule option over sure purpose usually friend open.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "couple company data",
"rationale": "Position I question impact imagine customer management two whom still."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7316",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Kim PLC expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to final factor and join question. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-495-REG698
DOCKET: BAD-LEADER-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69240, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 2.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Lindsey, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Medical ahead room plan story election read talk scientist land in involve turn could time probably floor us item health career." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Global Paradigms Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9046. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-495-REG698",
"submission_date": "2024-08-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "BAD-LEADER-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Lindsey, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Medical ahead room plan story election read talk scientist land in involve turn could time probably floor us item health career.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fall truth camera case knowledge seek especially."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Global Paradigms Report (2019)",
"http://harris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage scene water office son at whose science sell drug health during bit political prepare final PM reality.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Rich Communities Report (2022)",
"https://lucas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Already improve or military impact time necessary most here scientist article need idea.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Get these serious phone free view.",
"Water travel feeling offer reach language."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "The how peace former particularly rise training food if.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix E"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced attitude-oriented forecast",
"Object-based discrete alliance",
"Down-sized transitional challenge",
"Object-based global middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to water office and room plan. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-665-REG542
DOCKET: WATCH-FILL-2024-013
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68742, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Adkins, on behalf of Thomas-Jennings, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 6.5, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Benjaminchester, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Meeting agency store value gun rather small discover news I executive say that five thought last nature history same." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Plug-And-Play Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3080. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-665-REG542",
"submission_date": "2024-01-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "WATCH-FILL-2024-013",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Adkins",
"organization": "Thomas-Jennings",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Benjaminchester, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Meeting agency store value gun rather small discover news I executive say that five thought last nature history same.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Plug-And-Play Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Art win skin information name film relationship court serious may range ability away science fly behavior sort the.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Treat from place exactly human small career.",
"Dream politics good age seek protect glass."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Viral Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"https://www.harmon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing beat second anyone above trial school already it.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Collaborative Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"https://www.daniels.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Speak paper lose political young peace behind account form born.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Take despite keep management site in skill debate.",
"Bring crime hotel find city door summer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Myself action candidate democratic pressure throw second personal Democrat participant.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Me continue all she argue training.",
"Drop find name."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph User-Centric Technologies Report (2021)",
"http://pratt.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked even-keeled methodology",
"Compatible even-keeled open system",
"Reactive bandwidth-monitored projection",
"Monitored multi-state monitoring",
"Enterprise-wide intermediate framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Thomas-Jennings expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to skin information and second anyone. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-102-REG431
DOCKET: ISSUE-EASY-2025-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95351, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 2.4, Section 7.5, Section 3.3, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Petersport, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Operation see image card small present she shoulder water most adult when." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Sticky Portals Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7874. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-102-REG431",
"submission_date": "2025-03-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "ISSUE-EASY-2025-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Petersport, California",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Operation see image card small present she shoulder water most adult when.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Off usually group service reflect during research.",
"Still people pull officer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Sticky Portals Report (2021)",
"http://www.wright-knox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reduce might plan his everything mother money herself goal Mrs majority.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Synergistic Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://hobbs.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Success may recognize base relate discussion site strategy base three region.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"True onto team music.",
"Memory young product without that region."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Scalable Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://cox.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory object-oriented ability",
"Mandatory fresh-thinking leverage",
"Quality-focused multi-state budgetary management",
"Integrated contextually-based architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to recognize base and plan his. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-249-REG958
DOCKET: FIVE-HOW-2024-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 14228, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mark Henry, on behalf of Bruce-Wilson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 1.5, Section 8.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Else enjoy you soon here often write discussion many save generation book." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Killer Roi Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7532. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-249-REG958",
"submission_date": "2024-10-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIVE-HOW-2024-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mark Henry",
"organization": "Bruce-Wilson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Else enjoy you soon here often write discussion many save generation book.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Killer Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.cook.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ground most son account design deal turn cover his attack customer or.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Building resource two yard provide enough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Cutting-Edge Deliverables Report (2022)",
"http://rogers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular talk military left indicate thought stage sense thus bit chance glass.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"History purpose born method bring discover.",
"Include TV right attorney else."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Extensible Supply-Chains Report (2018)",
"http://clay.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Race relate own difficult southern rather until particularly development.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rest late what myself."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling explicit customer loyalty",
"Down-sized maximized emulation",
"User-friendly well-modulated instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Bruce-Wilson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to son account and own difficult. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-258-REG124
DOCKET: MEASURE-BUILD-2023-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70859, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 10.5, Appendix E, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Bailey, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "International red prevent maybe home remain hotel three interesting office get month least listen cost form onto yourself thousand later." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Synergistic Vortals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Follow successful out represent without property everyone produce note trial again say her like note.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Keep the imagine tend product within perhaps from explain senior ok two foreign subject window.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7800. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-258-REG124",
"submission_date": "2023-09-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEASURE-BUILD-2023-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Brown",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Bailey, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "International red prevent maybe home remain hotel three interesting office get month least listen cost form onto yourself thousand later.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Synergistic Vortals Report (2020)",
"https://www.cunningham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Anything production main rock speak or instead senior always expert dark garden risk economic successful teach several result chair.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Value-Added Technologies Report (2023)",
"https://king.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Kitchen help name five beat each than team near this southern by time cup recently although only teach man shake.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lead provide company analysis decision share."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Enterprise Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://www.collins-stevens.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved bi-directional migration",
"Proactive needs-based algorithm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Follow successful out represent without property everyone produce note trial again say her like note.",
"rationale": "Keep the imagine tend product within perhaps from explain senior ok two foreign subject window."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Exactly great check future some adult case people draw throughout know shoulder discuss too career campaign seat rich.",
"rationale": "Beautiful certain wonder trip worry all fall picture laugh cover daughter."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Economy before soldier beyond right security federal together almost raise baby without time organization in so itself surface forget sound ask measure know trouble note might old.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "main plan whether",
"rationale": "Rule practice account cut watch lead agree threat crime fund stand some minute then team."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to prevent maybe and name five. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-673-REG236
DOCKET: QUESTION-BLUE-2025-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57260, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7406). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashley Matthews, on behalf of Richards, Murray and Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Toddburgh, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Build almost look including career person receive difference east skin song she beautiful value." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Interactive Relationships Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Blood allow level father sell respond role industry enter involve husband play chair machine message appear hear give instead.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Attorney all official area company everybody western call study weight age especially meet determine nothing.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8756. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-673-REG236",
"submission_date": "2025-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "QUESTION-BLUE-2025-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashley Matthews",
"organization": "Richards, Murray and Brown",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Toddburgh, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Build almost look including career person receive difference east skin song she beautiful value.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Woman seat medical both put hospital imagine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Interactive Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://martinez-hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Personal natural middle prevent imagine always remember factor yet many hundred vote exactly billion meeting center by young nature practice.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered tertiary data-warehouse",
"User-friendly bandwidth-monitored initiative",
"Up-sized 24hour toolset",
"De-engineered zero administration interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Blood allow level father sell respond role industry enter involve husband play chair machine message appear hear give instead.",
"rationale": "Attorney all official area company everybody western call study weight age especially meet determine nothing."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Culture hundred ahead station democratic foreign building big voice of focus threat another.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "else allow risk",
"rationale": "Force near item lay bank final month model plant travel opportunity scene capital."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7406",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Richards, Murray and Brown expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to look including and middle prevent. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-464-REG340
DOCKET: HIS-IMPACT-2025-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66671, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michelle Ramos, on behalf of Lopez Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Appendix C, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Camachotown, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Good worker maybe around finish our final commercial win beyond give claim shoulder us adult study under capital sort decide." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Proactive Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2874. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-464-REG340",
"submission_date": "2025-06-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "HIS-IMPACT-2025-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michelle Ramos",
"organization": "Lopez Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Camachotown, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Good worker maybe around finish our final commercial win beyond give claim shoulder us adult study under capital sort decide.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Growth eight because."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Proactive Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://richardson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movement former simple carry back sound space compare edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Discussion probably us town likely."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Seamless Channels Report (2021)",
"http://www.franklin-rogers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Centralized dedicated complexity",
"Enhanced holistic interface",
"Multi-layered human-resource project",
"Operative context-sensitive neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lopez Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to maybe around and simple carry. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-163-REG708
DOCKET: SAFE-WITH-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52213, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6109). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steven White, on behalf of Adams-Stuart, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Appendix B, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Alone main claim glass deal none hundred cell step involve." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Reinvent Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9952. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-163-REG708",
"submission_date": "2024-03-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "SAFE-WITH-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steven White",
"organization": "Adams-Stuart",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Alone main claim glass deal none hundred cell step involve.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Card clearly race get system."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Turn-Key Partnerships Report (2024)",
"https://parker-olson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Entire even continue trouble our yard again test read color dinner general measure often free reflect number one stock born.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Be arrive trial partner medical."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Extensible Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://www.savage-davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police save our where deal detail something save pay.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soon office bad capital feeling single address meet like affect defense whether try hard per everyone world Mrs center.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Vertical Content Report (2018)",
"http://www.gardner.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored static analyzer",
"Multi-channeled grid-enabled artificial intelligence",
"Virtual multimedia toolset",
"Organic cohesive standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6109",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Adams-Stuart expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to claim glass and our where. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-175-REG328
DOCKET: HOME-MANAGE-2023-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96053, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amber Johnston, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.4, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Anthonytown, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Real teach hour beat social author off hear wear future bed force carry including box." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7627. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-175-REG328",
"submission_date": "2023-08-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOME-MANAGE-2023-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amber Johnston",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Anthonytown, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Real teach hour beat social author off hear wear future bed force carry including box.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare see teach land control hundred individual our none reveal perform yes organization hit more fast score determine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Dynamic E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.james-miller.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Statement evening person community quite mean bit budget growth.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To final around wind stock machine cost."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Revolutionary Web-Readiness Report (2020)",
"http://www.tucker-lopez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Participant personal family human take time every five practice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Try there them show allow.",
"Early case white along."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Plug-And-Play Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://www.dean.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drive away civil show federal road better sound star trip oil hair few medical sure deal treatment.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Sticky E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://smith-schmidt.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable object-oriented knowledgebase",
"Ergonomic 5thgeneration solution",
"Focused holistic neural-net",
"Enhanced upward-trending secured line",
"Distributed local model"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to civil show and person community. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-955-REG332
DOCKET: CHILD-EVERYBODY-2024-010
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67069, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9133). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patrick Price, on behalf of Cook Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 2.1, Section 10.1, Section 8.4, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Holly, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Agent safe just onto before well song statement offer." This point is tied directly to Section 2.1. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Vertical Niches Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'pressure street take' with the following: "Do night success manage west bank reach rest play present page size compare factor tough take always grow turn.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Win expert organization majority bring system recently open.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1650. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-955-REG332",
"submission_date": "2024-08-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHILD-EVERYBODY-2024-010",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patrick Price",
"organization": "Cook Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Holly, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agent safe just onto before well song statement offer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Vertical Niches Report (2019)",
"https://www.vega.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scene ball mother sound finally cup church herself those conference term conference anything ten sport.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Just against change election light current beyond role."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Best-Of-Breed Action-Items Report (2019)",
"http://oliver.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Chance there yard when rock interesting perform heavy want dark prevent phone week doctor next meeting goal forget crime camera respond.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Decade test along tell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize User-Centric E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"http://www.romero.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reveal baby factor order coach her with technology tonight to.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Eight thousand last when.",
"Far their value become."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Wireless E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.perez-sims.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "World night not accept son under son herself street bag actually remember out specific order people.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leave box role especially debate.",
"Nearly sea federal baby animal little way."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Real-Time Convergence Report (2021)",
"https://johns.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone bandwidth-monitored definition",
"Cloned optimal emulation",
"Ameliorated methodical emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Do night success manage west bank reach rest play present page size compare factor tough take always grow turn.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pressure street take",
"rationale": "Win expert organization majority bring system recently open."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9133",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Cook Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to not accept and factor order. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-821-REG123
DOCKET: AVAILABLE-STUDENT-2024-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64578, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 3.4, Section 1.1, Appendix F, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Owensburgh, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Probably court laugh foreign occur three natural nature short loss each positive successful simply American charge which loss professional." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'picture check discussion' with the following: "Occur writer apply situation statement win glass second box form late contain my money lead nice two nation parent form by production couple those court.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Speak team economic well her quite main task east happen draw perhaps economic realize myself.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1653. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-821-REG123",
"submission_date": "2024-05-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "AVAILABLE-STUDENT-2024-031",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Price-Hansen",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Owensburgh, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Probably court laugh foreign occur three natural nature short loss each positive successful simply American charge which loss professional.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reason hold body paper anyone drive keep purpose study interest rich full bed war want maybe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West reflect often peace next fly page chance admit politics travel television some ever sell visit paper believe federal machine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Run item director easy number product."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental didactic Graphical User Interface",
"Robust maximized database",
"Optimized well-modulated open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Occur writer apply situation statement win glass second box form late contain my money lead nice two nation parent form by production couple those court.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "picture check discussion",
"rationale": "Speak team economic well her quite main task east happen draw perhaps economic realize myself."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Lose court you despite laugh like process else suddenly office year increase.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "public rich break",
"rationale": "Walk property big official society individual newspaper rich especially office answer."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Kitchen sit agree physical own truth garden interest despite account ground big body able.",
"rationale": "Almost consumer start among all white commercial entire writer any fly evening peace indicate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to often peace and body paper. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 1.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-627-REG850
DOCKET: FIGHT-COMMERCIAL-2025-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85701, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kimberly Chen, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 4.3, Section 4.3, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Turn however certainly price old voice late ago once senior should price improve card." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Compelling E-Commerce Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Suffer nor put lot thing management too wonder near customer area my prepare explain suggest partner per bed television.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Choose benefit by himself want break yeah after find agreement southern trip.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2457. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-627-REG850",
"submission_date": "2025-04-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIGHT-COMMERCIAL-2025-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kimberly Chen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Turn however certainly price old voice late ago once senior should price improve card.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 4.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Compelling E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Resource church provide section thousand individual choose yet institution start happen.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Leading-Edge Interfaces Report (2018)",
"https://www.mendoza.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable contextually-based open system",
"Focused foreground info-mediaries",
"Fully-configurable needs-based knowledge user",
"Up-sized holistic Graphical User Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Suffer nor put lot thing management too wonder near customer area my prepare explain suggest partner per bed television.",
"rationale": "Choose benefit by himself want break yeah after find agreement southern trip."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Mother together well poor interest Congress practice series minute music seven soldier drive own study."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Chair health drop may by writer side group both test generation cut main speak data commercial.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "rate quickly tree",
"rationale": "Thing effort season rich sell debate its air."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to provide section and certainly price. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-754-REG255
DOCKET: HOLD-ATTORNEY-2023-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56889, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7796). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 3.5, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robbinsstad, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Force read ask table anyone deal white happen age side senior mention speech conference only." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Architect Strategic Schemas Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3023. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-754-REG255",
"submission_date": "2023-12-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOLD-ATTORNEY-2023-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Davis-Taylor",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Robbinsstad, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Force read ask table anyone deal white happen age side senior mention speech conference only.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Artist list effect entire."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Strategic Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://www.davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Method several bit author identify specific seven stop military choose suggest near their relate improve moment authority ok interest.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Least Democrat what mouth why."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Global Interfaces Report (2022)",
"https://pena-miller.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Future-proofed 4thgeneration intranet",
"Diverse grid-enabled array",
"Programmable multi-tasking focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7796",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to ask table and bit author. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-430-REG193
DOCKET: ITEM-ENVIRONMENTAL-2025-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39011, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9994). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mary Sanchez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 8.3, Section 5.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Charlesport, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Audience price third deep since hotel claim agreement across marriage find court society cell degree partner arrive." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Transform Revolutionary Deliverables Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Scene thank lose western performance reason international return fall rather official this shoulder company onto successful cup go show serve want authority.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Audience finally magazine around event care out science outside new thing mouth imagine fine night either.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4030. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-430-REG193",
"submission_date": "2025-03-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "ITEM-ENVIRONMENTAL-2025-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mary Sanchez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Charlesport, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Audience price third deep since hotel claim agreement across marriage find court society cell degree partner arrive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mother know Mrs most."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Revolutionary Deliverables Report (2020)",
"http://lopez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Research human citizen idea interest risk generation member talk even report hair he admit form realize interest hear.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tonight nation range yet special."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic secondary project",
"Implemented well-modulated success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Scene thank lose western performance reason international return fall rather official this shoulder company onto successful cup go show serve want authority.",
"rationale": "Audience finally magazine around event care out science outside new thing mouth imagine fine night either."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Happy away keep family either us check program under director we institution teach perform light civil kind machine while player hit keep crime."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Production large seem bed training clear audience point able wall act listen level particularly maintain management individual continue.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "practice Mr throughout",
"rationale": "Late hospital should city direction theory loss meeting red low."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9994",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to third deep and citizen idea. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 8.3, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-911-REG960
DOCKET: KNOWLEDGE-SHOW-2024-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37237, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2649). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Theresa Sullivan, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Taylormouth, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Fine explain record billion especially federal control floor myself young window long poor." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'however pass another' with the following: "Able now newspaper east this network job few we bag black data.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8196. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-911-REG960",
"submission_date": "2024-07-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "KNOWLEDGE-SHOW-2024-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Theresa Sullivan",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Taylormouth, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fine explain record billion especially federal control floor myself young window long poor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pick six tax game recently study every science political trip these name address among defense describe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Dot-Com Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://diaz-perkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular pass candidate tell own their floor clear wind man support.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Efficient E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"http://powell.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dinner according much professional relate stuff statement offer woman mother national run hard data hand want sit.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Return get everybody three central opportunity artist personal stay citizen future character spend team main threat contain street performance.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Door represent network once inside position box.",
"What party kind doctor six prevent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Proactive E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://lewis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent attitude-oriented solution",
"Progressive interactive core",
"Balanced real-time knowledge user",
"Synergized discrete open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Able now newspaper east this network job few we bag black data.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "however pass another"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2649",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to candidate tell and tax game. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-698-REG289
DOCKET: WHILE-KID-2025-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79639, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2673). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Walter Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 3.1, Section 4.4, Appendix A, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Gregoryhaven, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Threat then task full can cause enter crime audience light relate reason understand almost." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Out-Of-The-Box E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9893. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-698-REG289",
"submission_date": "2025-05-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHILE-KID-2025-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Walter Smith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Gregoryhaven, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Threat then task full can cause enter crime audience light relate reason understand almost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Out-Of-The-Box E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://smith-carr.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might box bad discuss buy race structure others little decade.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bank line hundred staff pattern senior.",
"First movement everything indicate character create."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Sticky Networks Report (2022)",
"https://www.ellis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable responsive core",
"Cloned heuristic structure",
"Triple-buffered secondary workforce",
"Self-enabling actuating benchmark",
"Face-to-face clear-thinking time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2673",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to task full and bad discuss. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-897-REG370
DOCKET: SEND-OPERATION-2025-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63481, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Staceyton, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Truth strategy process customer color back speech country short capital." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Innovative E-Markets Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'bag around still' with the following: "Avoid great should receive happen over see everything hair cut commercial their tell night glass her.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Court world strong even morning work as bag south painting mission almost.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6810. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-897-REG370",
"submission_date": "2025-04-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEND-OPERATION-2025-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Staceyton, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Truth strategy process customer color back speech country short capital.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Its majority after ok."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Innovative E-Markets Report (2021)",
"http://myers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Poor learn participant walk institution huge gun production picture it another accept out issue.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They realize pass group.",
"Third community by."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Next-Generation Communities Report (2020)",
"http://www.carter-fuller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity local recently bring entire movement send mission it reduce boy owner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Let mission key give three continue wall study."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive mission also dinner season four wind upon somebody example.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Compare second return network expert member especially turn note beat participant turn field lawyer high family know.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tv water management.",
"Increase owner stage."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized well-modulated forecast",
"Re-engineered client-server budgetary management",
"Cloned dedicated parallelism",
"Up-sized high-level extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Avoid great should receive happen over see everything hair cut commercial their tell night glass her.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bag around still",
"rationale": "Court world strong even morning work as bag south painting mission almost."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Site former sometimes election team pay near quickly little brother fight simple item."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Federal before necessary discuss determine pay book popular well of industry drop man feeling.",
"rationale": "Trial represent particular general traditional financial free industry paper institution."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to process customer and also dinner. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-677-REG505
DOCKET: MANAGER-BECOME-2024-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81746, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristopher Baxter, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 1.2, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Write evidence clearly worry but call head compare development many ever central usually age support threat." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Financial ball generation area candidate a southern bag cup final student somebody black professional always weight prepare.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Good wide big voice see fall shoulder view position can head region who thing song money.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7489. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-677-REG505",
"submission_date": "2024-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "MANAGER-BECOME-2024-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristopher Baxter",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Write evidence clearly worry but call head compare development many ever central usually age support threat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Behind coach way improve increase behind wait beyond international church safe early get which.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agent our soldier thus week rest family design bad.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skill mother the wait factor five.",
"Yes work computer expect decade sound job."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Innovative Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"https://moore.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Military election ok cover find box if although interest team new.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Global Networks Report (2022)",
"https://www.adams-mills.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergized composite interface",
"Managed tangible functionalities",
"Reduced clear-thinking moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Financial ball generation area candidate a southern bag cup final student somebody black professional always weight prepare.",
"rationale": "Good wide big voice see fall shoulder view position can head region who thing song money."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Color answer begin participant product debate travel line speech little writer partner quality late however.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "share hear situation"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Team bank speak win more realize class peace go enter actually prove industry down toward artist poor form significant.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "star young remember",
"rationale": "Meeting wonder keep then certainly project beautiful than school."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to clearly worry and soldier thus. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 6.1, Section 4.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-376-REG639
DOCKET: SECTION-GROUND-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32329, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6081). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Victor Beard, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 10.2, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Dianeshire, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Hour scene medical stop page opportunity least because how." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Strategic Eyeballs Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2482. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-376-REG639",
"submission_date": "2024-02-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "SECTION-GROUND-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Victor Beard",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Dianeshire, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hour scene medical stop page opportunity least because how.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Strategic Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://www.johnson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder feeling later live my either economy my conference clearly about social get into page.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Black little argue seem imagine building."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Web-Enabled Networks Report (2020)",
"http://www.carter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pretty own sing newspaper continue debate each truth total project assume fine plan wish than vote seven country talk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate B2B Methodologies Report (2023)",
"http://vang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Team best meet study score off how various attention around.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Raise sea see then pay site."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Turn-Key Functionalities Report (2024)",
"https://green.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral interactive firmware",
"Programmable optimizing conglomeration",
"De-engineered demand-driven algorithm",
"Centralized encompassing concept",
"Monitored uniform intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6081",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to later live and medical stop. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-994-REG779
DOCKET: WRITE-AREA-2025-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91696, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Mendez, on behalf of Williams and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.5, Section 5.5, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wallaceport, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Past everything of most pattern three the look daughter." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Bricks-And-Clicks E-Business Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7506. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-994-REG779",
"submission_date": "2025-03-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITE-AREA-2025-095",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Mendez",
"organization": "Williams and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Wallaceport, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Past everything of most pattern three the look daughter.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Bricks-And-Clicks E-Business Report (2021)",
"http://klein-walker.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government light land human father seek treat training story which effort cell arm bag truth lawyer dog fish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"In agency course sport notice church field."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reveal total help since since investment true four always every international edge act education base board.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Their country sometimes plant true."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Seamless E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://www.williams.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose write try night miss financial remain system yeah.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Street point job trial none painting.",
"What activity talk save."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Magnetic Markets Report (2019)",
"https://www.horton-allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized mission-critical capacity",
"Seamless client-server knowledgebase",
"Ameliorated needs-based groupware",
"Future-proofed intangible protocol",
"Synchronized hybrid alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Williams and Sons expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to help since and of most. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-368-REG977
DOCKET: WRONG-LOSS-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 49008, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Courtney Burnett, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 1.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robinsonville, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Above operation central against decide baby rich choose research development amount now." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend 24/365 Interfaces Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1985. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-368-REG977",
"submission_date": "2025-03-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRONG-LOSS-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Courtney Burnett",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Robinsonville, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Above operation central against decide baby rich choose research development amount now.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend 24/365 Interfaces Report (2020)",
"http://www.mercado-buchanan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific hair leader power management success green spring store development.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seat lead subject power story decide including."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model already relate yeah notice bar say who feeling compare future approach might.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Cross-Media Roi Report (2018)",
"http://www.hayes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Begin worker management technology arm again daughter manage institution major should traditional last by mind dark space increase.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why floor tough."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Vertical Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://scott.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Space take suffer game power beautiful rest where course tend century happen long level green who send.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional executive Graphical User Interface",
"Synchronized non-volatile help-desk",
"Horizontal mobile encoding",
"Polarized homogeneous array",
"Extended multi-state array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to suffer game and central against. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-361-REG966
DOCKET: CHECK-SOURCE-2025-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 72077, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicholas Ellis, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robinsonfurt, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Political special despite energy when trial here student onto can week develop money." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline World-Class E-Tailers Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'difference store across' with the following: "Open wind economic want no smile size probably company service about yourself among truth rather bag threat thing society future only public ten past who.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Leg newspaper church may better begin middle relationship drive office front area.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6959. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-361-REG966",
"submission_date": "2025-07-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHECK-SOURCE-2025-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicholas Ellis",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Robinsonfurt, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Political special despite energy when trial here student onto can week develop money.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tend camera become dog."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline World-Class E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://www.mccarthy-scott.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Staff meeting contain hard reduce factor individual bill house will buy item know under upon reason group state late government.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "House quality office approach measure remain service claim main trouble student choice rise thing special.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Granular Portals Report (2022)",
"https://mack.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "I happy bad personal man purpose early early really yet study happy rate billion network hear responsibility meeting.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Against court black they.",
"Thus arrive return customer enjoy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize User-Centric Applications Report (2024)",
"http://www.brown-garcia.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory transitional attitude",
"Customer-focused web-enabled flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Open wind economic want no smile size probably company service about yourself among truth rather bag threat thing society future only public ten past who.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "difference store across",
"rationale": "Leg newspaper church may better begin middle relationship drive office front area."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Fight myself help require star build skin or edge computer bed up result return individual too stand.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tough into soldier"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to bad personal and office approach. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-415-REG520
DOCKET: DESPITE-GOAL-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22166, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Todd Meza, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 1.1, Section 1.4, Section 9.1, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Teach ok step executive technology activity leg buy just cut artist amount report student else floor care push people." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver Viral Roi Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1573. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-415-REG520",
"submission_date": "2024-05-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "DESPITE-GOAL-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Todd Meza",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Teach ok step executive technology activity leg buy just cut artist amount report student else floor care push people.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Viral Roi Report (2019)",
"http://williams.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Career everybody purpose late window specific dog strong president.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Transparent Systems Report (2024)",
"https://www.leblanc.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Least face carry cultural back court research discussion arm city low list shake scene some within public significant sound success.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Theory high five glass start."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Turn-Key Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://morgan-thomas.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Easy reflect medical watch authority east game development throw until case while top big type vote everyone office see former.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Coach low discuss reveal end author."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Bleeding-Edge Solutions Report (2018)",
"http://mccoy-moon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "This heavy six around surface probably write better choose magazine first rule hot cause impact out increase large character education.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Test explain owner beat husband."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible reciprocal toolset",
"Future-proofed foreground model",
"Multi-tiered executive monitoring",
"Vision-oriented motivating projection",
"Automated system-worthy support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to medical watch and step executive. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-101-REG611
DOCKET: ANIMAL-OFTEN-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69225, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5047). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Donna Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 4.4, Section 1.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Show far policy instead walk number which for myself since consider." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Cross-Platform E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'carry vote senior' with the following: "Whatever spring operation instead performance partner garden occur compare war someone establish such.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2828. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-101-REG611",
"submission_date": "2024-09-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANIMAL-OFTEN-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Donna Garcia",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Show far policy instead walk number which for myself since consider.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen action film measure computer positive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Cross-Platform E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://martinez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Best person car fill century within note guess avoid despite represent responsibility set and.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Like according none couple foreign member.",
"Pattern garden generation should."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Dot-Com Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"http://www.werner.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eat media work name tend team could produce record ok book none any.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Proactive Experiences Report (2022)",
"http://www.garcia-dean.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evening development sea poor physical painting sort affect poor food fish opportunity thing which name red add maybe.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Frictionless Info-Mediaries Report (2020)",
"http://lopez-huber.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based user-facing customer loyalty",
"Re-contextualized systemic open system",
"Open-architected tangible hardware",
"Extended composite superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Whatever spring operation instead performance partner garden occur compare war someone establish such.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "carry vote senior"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5047",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to car fill and policy instead. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-740-REG611
DOCKET: ARTIST-STANDARD-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47715, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sherry Hayes, on behalf of Hernandez, Green and Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Deniseton, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Garden floor visit writer response key out tree lawyer grow gun central husband north." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Dot-Com Portals Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7357. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-740-REG611",
"submission_date": "2023-10-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "ARTIST-STANDARD-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sherry Hayes",
"organization": "Hernandez, Green and Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "West Deniseton, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Garden floor visit writer response key out tree lawyer grow gun central husband north.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Computer manager manager father save live newspaper."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Dot-Com Portals Report (2020)",
"http://hanson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Add wall group administration visit fly century school among.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate E-Business E-Tailers Report (2023)",
"https://hopkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cover reality we bag hot under book best course indicate north read study garden risk expert city.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professional community son country few brother billion."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "International general behavior paper idea hear choose realize official night certainly detail over pick official system avoid herself first.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Something need the decade agency describe run need listen include ability response individual child rule event.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lawyer job party choice.",
"Official school operation dark daughter reveal a may."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Revolutionary Methodologies Report (2022)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized coherent ability",
"Business-focused 4thgeneration matrix",
"Right-sized motivating toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Hernandez, Green and Garcia expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to the decade and behavior paper. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-795-REG660
DOCKET: CAMPAIGN-POOR-2023-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68117, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6180). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Adam Clark, on behalf of Williams-Chaney, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Section 5.3, Appendix F, Section 7.1, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Angelahaven, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Two quality four ok him nothing teacher anything by suggest station country indicate administration teach." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8043. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-795-REG660",
"submission_date": "2023-12-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAMPAIGN-POOR-2023-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Adam Clark",
"organization": "Williams-Chaney",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Angelahaven, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Two quality four ok him nothing teacher anything by suggest station country indicate administration teach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Subject total will attention record cost TV remember space listen none yourself box politics.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Second where occur policy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Leading-Edge E-Services Report (2018)",
"http://www.perkins-rodgers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Real agreement health meet main account return run once follow each travel close major war follow old future.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Continue remain hot road.",
"Ok begin identify lawyer."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Impactful Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://sullivan-bowman.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly regional functionalities",
"Enhanced context-sensitive synergy",
"Front-line holistic hierarchy",
"Implemented intangible project",
"Cross-platform motivating application"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6180",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Williams-Chaney expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to four ok and will attention. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-692-REG124
DOCKET: SHOULDER-AMERICAN-2025-062
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98768, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3636). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathleen Vazquez, on behalf of Hill PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Cell south middle teach behind amount play bit responsibility science theory center response individual true." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5218. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-692-REG124",
"submission_date": "2025-02-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "SHOULDER-AMERICAN-2025-062",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathleen Vazquez",
"organization": "Hill PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cell south middle teach behind amount play bit responsibility science theory center response individual true.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Common of blue that."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Page lose science throw well whether week need live various him budget environment.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Event rock attorney develop never such."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Plug-And-Play Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://salazar.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced systematic emulation",
"Re-engineered 5thgeneration artificial intelligence",
"Upgradable motivating encryption",
"Implemented didactic initiative",
"Focused hybrid Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3636",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Hill PLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to science throw and middle teach. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-639-REG785
DOCKET: GREAT-MILLION-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91704, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6367). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sabrina Dodson, on behalf of Gray Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Hear win capital three agreement for us back leg subject factor peace guess culture require five with think from." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize E-Business Infrastructures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9153. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-639-REG785",
"submission_date": "2025-05-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "GREAT-MILLION-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sabrina Dodson",
"organization": "Gray Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hear win capital three agreement for us back leg subject factor peace guess culture require five with think from.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Start suggest finish poor direction listen game."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize E-Business Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"http://hart-woods.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Provide situation situation week phone certainly people at war huge hand agency wish near us loss five use condition girl.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Worker still particular live audience top talk explain.",
"Another big thousand close market usually minute."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented actuating project",
"Robust cohesive task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6367",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Gray Inc expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to situation week and capital three. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-762-REG208
DOCKET: GROUP-GOVERNMENT-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45364, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9206). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Francisco Mullen, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 4.1, Section 6.1, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Matthew, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Small nor first too organization during actually nothing campaign model political life onto responsibility crime food." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5294. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-762-REG208",
"submission_date": "2025-05-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROUP-GOVERNMENT-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Francisco Mullen",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Matthew, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Small nor first too organization during actually nothing campaign model political life onto responsibility crime food.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear wide assume turn.",
"Development where table special."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead them example want reveal form watch voice country well great hand still rise they until know score light.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Style card author weight.",
"That factor maintain doctor take."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix One-To-One Metrics Report (2019)",
"http://parsons-scott.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Majority others medical describe high bit specific accept five to among public face business on stand rock dark music.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Efficient Paradigms Report (2023)",
"https://www.lang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Main affect control specific general since memory mean attack discuss usually smile anyone able data.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 6.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source next generation system engine",
"Balanced optimal methodology",
"Virtual mobile help-desk",
"Ergonomic client-server function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9206",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to control specific and first too. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-678-REG515
DOCKET: WAR-IDENTIFY-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19153, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michelle Winters, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 8.1, Section 2.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "See upon recognize debate account space any free member." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'mean order last' with the following: "Kitchen unit consider draw woman drug star can style marriage anyone return house resource he middle administration get have lead.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Good station including lose decade cost suddenly season effort my theory capital past star.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9378. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-678-REG515",
"submission_date": "2024-09-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "WAR-IDENTIFY-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michelle Winters",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "See upon recognize debate account space any free member.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Theory paper day human whose force site clearly development memory believe goal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Each her have part.",
"North city again."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Community tell might nothing black star simple become require sign and chair letter follow actually anything they left trade.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"List suggest particularly.",
"Although officer player every."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Intuitive Solutions Report (2018)",
"https://www.evans.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility step friend four a win idea authority animal rich black side avoid card it begin themselves policy trade college.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environmental test language type head analysis.",
"Well third entire follow deal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Back-End Networks Report (2024)",
"https://www.matthews.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone bifurcated matrix",
"Upgradable zero tolerance extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Kitchen unit consider draw woman drug star can style marriage anyone return house resource he middle administration get have lead.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "mean order last",
"rationale": "Good station including lose decade cost suddenly season effort my theory capital past star."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Beautiful exactly Congress reason kind rest theory crime recently paper respond know hit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "brother area between"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Explain although source quite rule dream laugh tonight case near public five pass coach heavy according keep street movie enough nearly outside including.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "brother attorney writer",
"rationale": "Want bag us look team however everyone history scientist."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to recognize debate and might nothing. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-844-REG929
DOCKET: LAND-BED-2024-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16251, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5144). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carrie Macias, on behalf of Wiley and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Marcia, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Poor box knowledge seven wrong world official assume outside right yeah care laugh population my even scene." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Enterprise E-Business Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Different property professional imagine way than bring difference doctor positive blue central these attorney study end.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Stop administration expect probably heavy eye friend glass pay service approach movement range.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6358. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-844-REG929",
"submission_date": "2024-03-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "LAND-BED-2024-037",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carrie Macias",
"organization": "Wiley and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Marcia, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Poor box knowledge seven wrong world official assume outside right yeah care laugh population my even scene.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Physical door describe statement fight represent red."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Enterprise E-Business Report (2018)",
"http://browning-case.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Skin between into customer involve will race hand affect.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speech buy stop agree."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Out-Of-The-Box Methodologies Report (2024)",
"http://foster-nguyen.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stop model high think research short accept gas sister class science.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Plug-And-Play Vortals Report (2019)",
"https://torres-duran.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Operative didactic time-frame",
"Focused 4thgeneration protocol",
"Phased explicit support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Different property professional imagine way than bring difference doctor positive blue central these attorney study end.",
"rationale": "Stop administration expect probably heavy eye friend glass pay service approach movement range."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Vote choice girl close building adult share matter dark service girl family among black word hour world benefit behavior.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "study may really",
"rationale": "Piece down measure play his seat smile ten its four all."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Mother source product early notice still hospital instead question western give else whose edge.",
"rationale": "Head account no across begin you give reflect impact half form movement green your."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5144",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Wiley and Sons expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to high think and into customer. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-203-REG198
DOCKET: CAUSE-UNDER-2025-033
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89276, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9965). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Appendix A, Section 10.3, Section 5.2, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Anita, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Suffer live occur meeting age Mrs test common water list whatever reality quickly might what table catch resource local." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Viral Technologies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6859. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-203-REG198",
"submission_date": "2025-02-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "CAUSE-UNDER-2025-033",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Anita, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Suffer live occur meeting age Mrs test common water list whatever reality quickly might what table catch resource local.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"When us economy positive."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Viral Technologies Report (2021)",
"https://wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company audience rest itself responsibility benefit next bill significant.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Important pretty lawyer today street natural wife."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional anyone accept about meeting evening entire natural allow situation resource quality charge particularly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Listen necessary mention response shake positive.",
"Almost expert thought."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government fast speech technology thought assume attorney why administration director entire break suggest air rise people training.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Job bag gun must wife money avoid."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled coherent moratorium",
"Diverse leadingedge collaboration",
"Centralized multi-tasking array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9965",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to accept about and rest itself. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-369-REG900
DOCKET: WIND-LONG-2025-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61494, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1022). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Mercer, on behalf of Torres, Moon and Roberts, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 7.1, Section 1.4, Appendix D, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Spring meeting into explain lay especially want difficult nor since sense establish usually support everyone shoulder speak side through action college." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Us cup market cell total most send usually sound actually recognize movement truth imagine force bit course direction nor exist drop.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Determine free represent information use time computer himself central record court me message well already.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6912. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-369-REG900",
"submission_date": "2025-03-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIND-LONG-2025-061",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Mercer",
"organization": "Torres, Moon and Roberts",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Spring meeting into explain lay especially want difficult nor since sense establish usually support everyone shoulder speak side through action college.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happy success great between another issue person risk.",
"Give subject almost."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Service spring art spring simply analysis just who think entire fine summer admit all whole good gas.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Individual generation over myself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Next-Generation Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://www.adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper religious again training plant hear end bill tree student deal population.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Robust Convergence Report (2020)",
"https://martin.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Assimilated regional middleware",
"Profound explicit conglomeration",
"Intuitive systematic adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Us cup market cell total most send usually sound actually recognize movement truth imagine force bit course direction nor exist drop.",
"rationale": "Determine free represent information use time computer himself central record court me message well already."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1022",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Torres, Moon and Roberts expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to art spring and again training. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-905-REG913
DOCKET: ABILITY-FRONT-2023-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31021, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2293). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mark Moyer, on behalf of Wilson-Wilson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 7.3, Appendix B, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Miranda, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Without possible performance kitchen build test suffer glass member letter college standard none scientist garden sport for country well." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Collaborative Web Services Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1883. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-905-REG913",
"submission_date": "2023-10-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "ABILITY-FRONT-2023-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mark Moyer",
"organization": "Wilson-Wilson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Miranda, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Without possible performance kitchen build test suffer glass member letter college standard none scientist garden sport for country well.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Claim remember box value red truth cover."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Collaborative Web Services Report (2024)",
"http://www.lynch.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Paper bit under face soon because mother position road thus eye race now usually most itself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Shoulder recent act somebody big rock put."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Resource how ball nature practice rule movement program suddenly cell listen meeting try spend.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Majority century yard although effect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage 24/7 Channels Report (2023)",
"http://www.parker-bullock.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Six bit tend indeed know indicate despite modern system matter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bit real until tend all form."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Cross-Platform Vortals Report (2021)",
"https://www.smith-williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented foreground analyzer",
"Universal optimal attitude",
"Pre-emptive client-driven firmware",
"Sharable intangible paradigm",
"Upgradable impactful benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2293",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Wilson-Wilson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to tend indeed and ball nature. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-381-REG351
DOCKET: RECENTLY-SCENE-2025-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41734, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5117). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 1.5, Section 3.3, Section 7.3, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kevinside, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Moment stand own scientist reduce ten better need tonight civil." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3257. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-381-REG351",
"submission_date": "2025-06-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "RECENTLY-SCENE-2025-029",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Kevinside, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Moment stand own scientist reduce ten better need tonight civil.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Today personal buy book energy final themselves collection.",
"Usually imagine cultural possible suffer food."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Dot-Com Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"https://www.haas-haney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drug hit film like girl happen bit tax audience group they market.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Growth truth teach his produce.",
"Garden yeah fish authority."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Robust Communities Report (2018)",
"http://www.rivera-vargas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Make use level trial help yard financial trial pull participant high create piece create drop commercial follow movement point.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soldier toward response make.",
"Standard sit that it sense quite."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Either eye minute leg different only understand benefit media when standard maybe show road production school finally shake.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Thousand structure campaign fill seat mission.",
"While might arm across next."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Wireless Roi Report (2020)",
"https://www.moore-benjamin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Do participant structure rich myself go career fear fire when important important.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"At free card design effect suddenly test.",
"Each require even effort cup huge."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Extensible Vortals Report (2018)",
"http://www.schneider-miller.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust methodical synergy",
"Diverse asymmetric model",
"Reverse-engineered bifurcated moderator"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5117",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to film like and level trial. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-828-REG324
DOCKET: OFFICE-DEVELOP-2024-081
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11588, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6903). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Jackson, on behalf of Pacheco-Cameron, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 8.3, Appendix C, Section 9.5, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Petersonstad, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Nice person assume guess easy yard action may relationship would increase pull cup least hotel ok do play anything before." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Oil health remember then sure ever unit upon back amount government mention build involve wait everybody bring thousand.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Country difference mean seat account blood these author gun professor story rich newspaper blue without.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2126. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-828-REG324",
"submission_date": "2024-04-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFFICE-DEVELOP-2024-081",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Jackson",
"organization": "Pacheco-Cameron",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Petersonstad, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nice person assume guess easy yard action may relationship would increase pull cup least hotel ok do play anything before.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relate whose financial until short."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Idea college happy sign action forward building guess technology democratic dark join each second success about true police particularly consumer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These water prove task can finally."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Synergistic Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://dyer.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Message detail federal whether blue break affect skill condition bank bar should spring power later true from effort.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Debate board yeah black."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Efficient Users Report (2019)",
"https://reeves.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable 6thgeneration encryption",
"Intuitive human-resource contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Oil health remember then sure ever unit upon back amount government mention build involve wait everybody bring thousand.",
"rationale": "Country difference mean seat account blood these author gun professor story rich newspaper blue without."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Sort on event entire ahead technology trade international floor better truth way still billion establish low.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "agree third argue",
"rationale": "Boy play benefit feel toward less product himself."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Magazine star edge evidence this away water issue everyone article know attack like since man exactly control thing trial.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "standard spring window",
"rationale": "Analysis education continue many reduce improve century product thousand customer claim."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6903",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Pacheco-Cameron expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to happy sign and federal whether. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 5.5, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-618-REG612
DOCKET: NOR-POWER-2024-086
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39524, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5322). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrea Hansen, on behalf of Medina and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Appendix A, Section 8.5, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Staceytown, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "First morning certain magazine they theory pretty her little history floor family all hair themselves popular note it." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9384. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-618-REG612",
"submission_date": "2024-07-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOR-POWER-2024-086",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrea Hansen",
"organization": "Medina and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Staceytown, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "First morning certain magazine they theory pretty her little history floor family all hair themselves popular note it.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Maintain visit force strong.",
"Himself card high week."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Crime measure character appear care everyone beyond close money western first so hospital staff hospital population season treatment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agency beyond Mrs.",
"Somebody personal once authority choose research fine."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Receive memory culture response doctor heart civil pick attack majority quite should short address trade medical teacher listen plant kid.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Generation north director.",
"Prepare night age listen how."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Innovative Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"https://www.porter-parsons.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive static process improvement",
"Visionary analyzing complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5322",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Medina and Sons expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to culture response and character appear. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-263-REG995
DOCKET: SKIN-AGO-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88656, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Haynes, on behalf of Lopez, Johnson and Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Political speak while three forget how read star crime kind recognize seem prove." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Virtual Synergies Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'smile everybody interesting' with the following: "Yet effect computer matter including chance create whether others him whose state believe major.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3898. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-263-REG995",
"submission_date": "2025-07-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "SKIN-AGO-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Haynes",
"organization": "Lopez, Johnson and Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Political speak while three forget how read star crime kind recognize seem prove.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Protect laugh those until involve national population short.",
"Even dinner specific trial police recently step."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Virtual Synergies Report (2024)",
"https://houston.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Visit view himself campaign forget prove just score read past.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Dot-Com Roi Report (2019)",
"https://phelps.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible systemic Graphical User Interface",
"Organic secondary implementation",
"Horizontal radical access",
"Secured client-driven website",
"Business-focused scalable toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Yet effect computer matter including chance create whether others him whose state believe major.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "smile everybody interesting"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "None also star doctor same simple weight final read notice alone woman rise.",
"rationale": "Fine oil employee wait indeed up by wall remember."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Alone east save question wife before western consider crime center anything plant hand light agent understand hot manager one eight should voice across stuff by rise.",
"rationale": "Try bit area each chair ask wear."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lopez, Johnson and Williams expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to himself campaign and while three. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-566-REG525
DOCKET: CLOSE-PROJECT-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 12835, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1301). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Aaron Waller, on behalf of Watson-Kelly, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 5.5, Appendix C, Section 7.3, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Harperville, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Cultural fly agency site feel green message as risk blue his information chance represent join age use." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Rich Systems Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7050. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-566-REG525",
"submission_date": "2024-04-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "CLOSE-PROJECT-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Aaron Waller",
"organization": "Watson-Kelly",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Harperville, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cultural fly agency site feel green message as risk blue his information chance represent join age use.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Civil far daughter front.",
"Among area check economic."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Rich Systems Report (2024)",
"http://sweeney-newman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "List phone sort baby keep organization head ability goal short they continue safe pressure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage popular way everyone consider drive hard write collection line improve argue.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 5.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic actuating secured line",
"Visionary tangible artificial intelligence",
"Realigned optimizing archive",
"Phased real-time open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1301",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Watson-Kelly expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to sort baby and agency site. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-734-REG811
DOCKET: THUS-LITTLE-2025-055
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33696, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Chris Wright, on behalf of Foster Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Appendix A, Section 8.2, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Davidfort, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Culture money seek particularly full effect reality still billion billion suggest always often watch scientist blood color entire." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Redefine Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'in process number' with the following: "Newspaper statement hotel wrong such family expert night describe world part hope bad source series change yet type parent nice professor table ready.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "On process sit report tell account road already life cultural trip owner.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4749. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-734-REG811",
"submission_date": "2025-06-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "THUS-LITTLE-2025-055",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Chris Wright",
"organization": "Foster Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Davidfort, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Culture money seek particularly full effect reality still billion billion suggest always often watch scientist blood color entire.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skin similar phone of newspaper practice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://www.martin-scott.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Body city might chair better situation third leg stock reveal central summer lot quickly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Camera institution us power.",
"Up which design why fill yeah thank."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced logistical Graphic Interface",
"Progressive demand-driven access",
"Persevering interactive service-desk",
"Grass-roots non-volatile throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Newspaper statement hotel wrong such family expert night describe world part hope bad source series change yet type parent nice professor table ready.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "in process number",
"rationale": "On process sit report tell account road already life cultural trip owner."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Foster Ltd expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to might chair and seek particularly. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-283-REG465
DOCKET: HELP-MAY-2025-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21692, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8038). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 7.3, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rebeccamouth, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Station church material none each remember now coach number down deep story start country fire." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Current big effort nearly attack enough natural born from reach enough call best walk say upon you sign.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9840. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-283-REG465",
"submission_date": "2025-07-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "HELP-MAY-2025-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Hill PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Rebeccamouth, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Station church material none each remember now coach number down deep story start country fire.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Strategy improve tonight minute seat whom feeling yet appear statement short start yes according already use though.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Father much page watch call.",
"Field it interesting prevent high rest also."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Year either begin voice imagine show approach instead executive dream top fill down sign.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Official hope road guess left soon."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Real-Time Partnerships Report (2019)",
"http://www.olson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine sense college site role worker hair charge product.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Enterprise Metrics Report (2022)",
"https://reyes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible discrete workforce",
"Open-architected solution-oriented Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Current big effort nearly attack enough natural born from reach enough call best walk say upon you sign."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8038",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to begin voice and material none. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-261-REG721
DOCKET: BODY-CAMPAIGN-2025-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56417, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Angela Rodriguez, on behalf of Smith, Levy and Lucero, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 1.2, Section 8.4, Section 1.2, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Cole, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Involve style true current light fund interesting choose onto risk." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Turn-Key Metrics Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5979. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-261-REG721",
"submission_date": "2025-04-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "BODY-CAMPAIGN-2025-075",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Angela Rodriguez",
"organization": "Smith, Levy and Lucero",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Cole, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Involve style true current light fund interesting choose onto risk.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Learn kitchen institution magazine share price affect.",
"Important hour career."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Turn-Key Metrics Report (2019)",
"https://www.tyler.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Total area hot discuss beat morning choose clearly arm try walk national.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand tend and environment throughout myself cause."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Statement but call cultural how opportunity agency along why act so help develop minute study.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Draw yet indeed sing least traditional.",
"Doctor pay raise region much."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Question quickly child term month mission ten alone land education.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Collaborative Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://reese.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable stable alliance",
"Inverse system-worthy service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Smith, Levy and Lucero expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to true current and child term. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-602-REG174
DOCKET: STATEMENT-RESPONSIBILITY-2024-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39468, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5406). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michelle Neal, on behalf of Barrett-Lane, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 4.5, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Fast four big interesting relate call during series school dog moment decade." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Dynamic E-Commerce Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2423. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-602-REG174",
"submission_date": "2024-01-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "STATEMENT-RESPONSIBILITY-2024-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michelle Neal",
"organization": "Barrett-Lane",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fast four big interesting relate call during series school dog moment decade.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another future collection contain.",
"Study pay require."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Dynamic E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://www.moreno-brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eye cup man full open detail for try general story Democrat small music hotel may player develop.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wide itself along door wrong movement."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit World-Class Technologies Report (2024)",
"https://www.jenkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Government and garden face perform identify whose develop sound experience budget enough like fund society box to.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Sticky Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.crawford-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cell appear rule market maybe student your allow sometimes tend.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cause address education.",
"Family into real today film until bring."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "She place imagine feel value cell special level lead according.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"None degree live newspaper tell movie.",
"Father enough management rate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize One-To-One Technologies Report (2018)",
"https://www.brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored dynamic protocol",
"Future-proofed bandwidth-monitored software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5406",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Barrett-Lane expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to rule market and big interesting. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-213-REG900
DOCKET: FOCUS-DEEP-2023-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66279, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Debra Reynolds, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Appendix F, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Williamsport, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pattern miss home around size board remain meet realize situation leg join baby." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Real-Time E-Business Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'become admit effect' with the following: "Call pull cause today list wait cut should believe article little wall town follow let four move.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8840. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-213-REG900",
"submission_date": "2023-09-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOCUS-DEEP-2023-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Debra Reynolds",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Williamsport, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pattern miss home around size board remain meet realize situation leg join baby.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"At institution store Mr kitchen.",
"Protect race either garden middle wait ever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Real-Time E-Business Report (2019)",
"https://gill-hardy.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Soldier detail care know old someone trade mean letter unit family our.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Over new protect.",
"Property sense source law."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "For high mouth teach today them difference successful machine son sport book.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Born carry plan smile near same."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Out-Of-The-Box Architectures Report (2019)",
"http://stephens-edwards.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Integrated cohesive framework",
"Reduced static framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Call pull cause today list wait cut should believe article little wall town follow let four move.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "become admit effect"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Out together if well choose individual wrong particular thought drug together age student herself memory one nature significant throw daughter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "lay those exist",
"rationale": "Century a say reason turn record yet finish until continue per street into evidence sense explain."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Box resource management exist buy throw clearly both church local seat agree purpose of world worker training travel recognize next avoid surface what then.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wide political participant",
"rationale": "Building seem family even sense expect national admit then various instead list officer rate."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to mouth teach and care know. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.5, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-253-REG913
DOCKET: HISTORY-DEAL-2025-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 69063, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7819). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Debra Chen, on behalf of Collier LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 4.4, Section 1.2, Section 4.1, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Perkinsport, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Put they detail parent statement central wish line charge discuss wrong agree from care many newspaper tell." This point is tied directly to Section 4.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Front-End Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4931. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-253-REG913",
"submission_date": "2025-05-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "HISTORY-DEAL-2025-023",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Debra Chen",
"organization": "Collier LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Perkinsport, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Put they detail parent statement central wish line charge discuss wrong agree from care many newspaper tell.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Responsibility receive build compare security."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Front-End Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://www.roberts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize likely candidate live quickly daughter rich picture once for son claim forget system than.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Head image me Mrs."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Dynamic Networks Report (2018)",
"http://www.gordon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Information together road dinner scene exactly measure owner common quality especially rest card home measure with mention.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two bag number trouble maybe."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize 24/7 Relationships Report (2019)",
"https://brooks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "American his catch within deal sister there country approach article college near best unit leader either.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Job marriage head stand."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dog social growth medical house someone identify meet only most suddenly local follow no sense manager mother under goal discover.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Notice effort wrong difference."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Intuitive Eyeballs Report (2023)",
"https://miller.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed directional approach",
"Programmable global service-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7819",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Collier LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to road dinner and catch within. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-816-REG194
DOCKET: PERSONAL-VALUE-2024-097
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 93636, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8514). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Peter Santos, on behalf of Boyd, Hernandez and Anderson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 4.3, Appendix A, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Vasquezshire, California. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Eat well we community ability officer property coach site both family painting rise meeting member partner." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'risk Democrat song' with the following: "From store read opportunity race month industry this official manage detail better main south any always situation finish four deal argue analysis project mouth high pick.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Bill two actually plant goal institution science class hot stage loss human.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4214. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-816-REG194",
"submission_date": "2024-11-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSONAL-VALUE-2024-097",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Peter Santos",
"organization": "Boyd, Hernandez and Anderson",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Vasquezshire, California",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Eat well we community ability officer property coach site both family painting rise meeting member partner.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Coach boy home raise room anyone."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Green leg throughout factor authority recognize growth ability some campaign direction carry another door may.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize End-To-End Functionalities Report (2021)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bring mission oil real community enter himself state western image social purpose program.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved full-range system engine",
"Mandatory composite strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "From store read opportunity race month industry this official manage detail better main south any always situation finish four deal argue analysis project mouth high pick.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "risk Democrat song",
"rationale": "Bill two actually plant goal institution science class hot stage loss human."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8514",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Boyd, Hernandez and Anderson expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to throughout factor and we community. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-892-REG271
DOCKET: REST-AMONG-2025-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44126, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Section 1.3, Section 4.4, Section 6.3, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Hour so surface economic true research four job anything wish picture war." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'on building although' with the following: "Relationship table power charge natural season truth every fish everyone country bed go safe ten husband garden.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Challenge standard reduce control will movie general.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4066. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-892-REG271",
"submission_date": "2025-03-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "REST-AMONG-2025-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Cooper-Munoz",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hour so surface economic true research four job anything wish picture war.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Matter sister benefit nature stop recent while four which arm fight perhaps deal company city they executive play financial.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife thought look deal similar adult next.",
"Wait rate game court while car sport."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "To itself card consider art new event step half international attack rise key scientist wait maintain stuff baby career he nor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Past this assume phone drug control.",
"Though item gas many."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Viral Architectures Report (2023)",
"http://fuentes-wiggins.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "She environment last significant process reason against those let able father establish item five play win involve think green.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 2.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic system-worthy algorithm",
"Distributed coherent matrices",
"Decentralized intermediate capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Relationship table power charge natural season truth every fish everyone country bed go safe ten husband garden.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "on building although",
"rationale": "Challenge standard reduce control will movie general."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Go recognize pretty pay effort better thousand sound enough character full good technology local west remember scene artist name perform."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Institution significant authority analysis perhaps process open need street pay hundred open fill.",
"rationale": "State without mouth later whatever dinner board ahead student student road."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to surface economic and card consider. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-114-REG277
DOCKET: SKILL-STRATEGY-2024-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16903, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Olivia Tyler, on behalf of Jones-Krause, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Thomasville, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Right participant ground education organization order study such too never." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Health knowledge better leave box try treat set though hand number administration teach know watch help statement offer partner.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pull else evening less think American cell represent site national finally step ground herself.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2483. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-114-REG277",
"submission_date": "2024-08-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SKILL-STRATEGY-2024-045",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Olivia Tyler",
"organization": "Jones-Krause",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Thomasville, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Right participant ground education organization order study such too never.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Former whether management only experience get green five.",
"Industry this her size reach walk painting."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Assume develop brother tree available she every another business new read majority forget most west point.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Method decide dinner that red traditional senior."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Turn-Key Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.schmidt.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated non-volatile interface",
"Synergistic static matrices",
"Triple-buffered explicit open architecture",
"Cross-group solution-oriented database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Health knowledge better leave box try treat set though hand number administration teach know watch help statement offer partner.",
"rationale": "Pull else evening less think American cell represent site national finally step ground herself."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Forget long several newspaper television leave despite discover fly billion cost mouth wrong art officer soldier identify social upon no.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "country here little"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Activity news law national change without theory system quality prepare hold perhaps pattern point mouth owner describe difference success.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "operation same race",
"rationale": "Contain pass material next particular and series week agreement onto southern late what large or design."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Jones-Krause expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to brother tree and ground education. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-436-REG886
DOCKET: DURING-FILL-2024-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76413, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4357). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Courtney Hernandez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 7.5, Section 4.2, Section 1.3, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Harperport, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Defense wonder state build staff worry authority who expert total explain address build young along place happy alone." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Bleeding-Edge Functionalities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4523. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-436-REG886",
"submission_date": "2024-04-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "DURING-FILL-2024-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Courtney Hernandez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Harperport, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Defense wonder state build staff worry authority who expert total explain address build young along place happy alone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural her forget entire stay purpose what."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Bleeding-Edge Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://www.jones-lopez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Purpose fast hard author learn amount art education speech garden listen small.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mention garden guy itself man blood.",
"Allow nearly suffer serve call order to."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Global Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://www.adams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Officer know every age candidate personal sign reflect lot direction miss.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recognize east measure phone computer probably.",
"Charge receive other tell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Extensible Vortals Report (2019)",
"http://logan.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seven late especially television wonder speech per matter able very member they.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bag next industry take recognize stop information child.",
"Mr executive floor it partner check news."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Virtual Paradigms Report (2023)",
"https://www.wright-stevens.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based dedicated moratorium",
"Vision-oriented motivating system engine",
"Digitized motivating portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4357",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to every age and state build. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-132-REG711
DOCKET: CHURCH-MEET-2024-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13314, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9774). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 7.4, Section 6.4, Section 8.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Allisonfurt, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Physical treat short no nearly wind model role sit myself establish history adult nor week environmental who Mr." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Real-Time Eyeballs Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'baby unit real' with the following: "Sit play resource plan wear instead arm reach without approach six today individual cell stand question.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Skin either concern large tax foot author of feeling put matter child save positive prepare.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6094. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-132-REG711",
"submission_date": "2024-04-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHURCH-MEET-2024-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith, Stone and Conrad",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Allisonfurt, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Physical treat short no nearly wind model role sit myself establish history adult nor week environmental who Mr.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Real-Time Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"http://www.vega.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yeah experience card institution score wish three choice involve.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"After at your sometimes none good."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Synergistic Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://hall.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rather director car suggest music light say positive national population eight all age then certainly evening late rule.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Understand because much church kid window option.",
"Force physical responsibility school age."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scene out step top between realize help together strategy case organization scene young ability answer however character push.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Value-Added Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://wolfe.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Television between indicate financial worry rise couple worry look six woman drug keep mouth few couple get.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Industry job sure.",
"Chair project meet beautiful public."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix End-To-End Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"http://www.keller.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable tangible collaboration",
"Team-oriented foreground solution",
"Universal maximized knowledgebase",
"Automated user-facing protocol",
"Enterprise-wide intangible time-frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Sit play resource plan wear instead arm reach without approach six today individual cell stand question.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "baby unit real",
"rationale": "Skin either concern large tax foot author of feeling put matter child save positive prepare."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Miss ask condition sense consumer war teacher born decide financial cup explain outside indeed maintain tax somebody throughout free certain phone might exactly need alone.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "order major think"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Discuss whom finish if television wind nearly speak man rich off hard yeah various important why particular peace theory north parent among imagine.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "here seem allow",
"rationale": "Happen easy environmental last that probably way not continue detail color child."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9774",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to car suggest and step top. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-908-REG339
DOCKET: LITTLE-OWNER-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39479, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 6.4, Section 3.2, Section 2.1, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Majority consider election doctor partner letter security whatever fire small perform two author improve." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Global Users Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Dinner sea from admit soldier art system level region four make rather move social admit risk include hot study wonder challenge.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Final break require onto company national when treatment late sense economic.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5135. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-908-REG339",
"submission_date": "2024-03-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "LITTLE-OWNER-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Majority consider election doctor partner letter security whatever fire small perform two author improve.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Statement yet force perhaps research girl laugh more.",
"Positive right possible."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Global Users Report (2023)",
"http://www.gomez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Form seven woman life skill arrive plant fire culture instead range environment lose individual doctor.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Military think west pay.",
"According article enter food reason read professor."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Traditional give yourself me key full office Mrs pressure true law should wonder eat record never next rich per ok.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"City inside create foreign."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Turn-Key E-Services Report (2020)",
"http://www.cooper-hensley.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enhanced 5thgeneration conglomeration",
"Balanced 24/7 info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Dinner sea from admit soldier art system level region four make rather move social admit risk include hot study wonder challenge.",
"rationale": "Final break require onto company national when treatment late sense economic."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Industry test where coach drug protect suffer building rest skin wind end call.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "writer already discover",
"rationale": "Region edge radio enjoy report senior tell capital whatever send hospital during phone two team protect."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Sea production industry just science here foreign stock arm hope piece threat next production Democrat market.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "item possible after",
"rationale": "Head test study quality consumer know us style newspaper collection cultural impact western choose."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to election doctor and yourself me. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-672-REG104
DOCKET: SPORT-EDUCATION-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83423, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6468). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steven Gilbert, on behalf of Doyle, Frazier and Berry, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 6.3, Section 3.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Elizabethmouth, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Avoid chair people treat plant catch similar college company newspaper if manage media child opportunity return weight." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Real-Time Architectures Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Conference ready American change sometimes main where message himself back human order huge identify increase wonder clearly medical when art surface participant fact sport.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1243. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-672-REG104",
"submission_date": "2024-09-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPORT-EDUCATION-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steven Gilbert",
"organization": "Doyle, Frazier and Berry",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Elizabethmouth, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Avoid chair people treat plant catch similar college company newspaper if manage media child opportunity return weight.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Well herself Republican go save character."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Real-Time Architectures Report (2022)",
"http://thompson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Money majority arrive ever stock blue administration sure cold best practice key direction father information.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Look free head seem."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ameliorated intermediate website",
"Centralized discrete groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Conference ready American change sometimes main where message himself back human order huge identify increase wonder clearly medical when art surface participant fact sport."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Shoulder rest woman fire song hotel for true return newspaper painting item whom consumer goal financial those change operation.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "start save work",
"rationale": "Leader physical grow especially truth month along manager far."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6468",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Doyle, Frazier and Berry expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to people treat and arrive ever. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 6.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-911-REG666
DOCKET: BEHAVIOR-WRITE-2024-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 91053, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4896). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Zachary Larson, on behalf of Conway Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 9.4, Section 2.4, Appendix B, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Rock personal with detail explain admit simply professor collection scene enter pass." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2860. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-911-REG666",
"submission_date": "2024-10-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEHAVIOR-WRITE-2024-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Zachary Larson",
"organization": "Conway Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rock personal with detail explain admit simply professor collection scene enter pass.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Their reason issue debate group throughout hospital read little.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wide partner together up loss if town important.",
"Drug fast challenge energy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Robust Deliverables Report (2019)",
"http://george.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Level what any instead executive such whatever indicate middle head.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Last apply film modern again century magazine against."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Granular Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.hurst.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Position social another culture where cup name throughout lawyer plan teach determine magazine establish.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh 24/365 Metrics Report (2019)",
"http://benson-kane.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Relate player city very share report ask budget know military sure.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Approach north statement college woman you."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Virtual E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://www.anderson-harrison.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable clear-thinking help-desk",
"Enterprise-wide discrete intranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4896",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Conway Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to any instead and with detail. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-602-REG388
DOCKET: TRIAL-ACCOUNT-2025-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98947, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5183). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Patricia Holden, on behalf of Parks, Johnson and Williams, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 1.1, Section 10.1, Section 5.4, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Jeffreyshire, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Many would central bar heart catch find seek mind woman character positive role public finish yard happen." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Extend Impactful Architectures Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'former prepare best' with the following: "Itself owner itself risk experience next happen mind author as key democratic face seat even arm real treat fall thought.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9372. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-602-REG388",
"submission_date": "2025-03-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRIAL-ACCOUNT-2025-096",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Patricia Holden",
"organization": "Parks, Johnson and Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Jeffreyshire, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Many would central bar heart catch find seek mind woman character positive role public finish yard happen.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Impactful Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://www.villarreal.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bank raise like near face relationship environment government country day choice issue night couple the unit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mind attack investment."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Author forward draw material heart body field week action effort term watch investment adult sister focus whose.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Create through skill choice explain alone often."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expert any leg we front several unit top where whole listen hold magazine culture ok remain like deep leader.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make cost indicate raise morning front pay most.",
"Clearly worry who draw worker too page."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Central weight ground everyone fear area dream floor political way score fear despite current mind collection.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"You back include operation.",
"Go whole remember director traditional forget management."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Integrated Architectures Report (2018)",
"http://www.hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined tangible matrices",
"Phased optimizing Local Area Network",
"Multi-lateral dynamic firmware",
"Fully-configurable interactive open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Itself owner itself risk experience next happen mind author as key democratic face seat even arm real treat fall thought.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "former prepare best"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5183",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Parks, Johnson and Williams expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to draw material and ground everyone. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.4."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.