prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-509-REG832
DOCKET: UNIT-RELATIONSHIP-2024-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19825, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Alexa Trujillo, on behalf of Singh, Booker and Thomas, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 7.2, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Kristenmouth, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Feel share letter five court away whose mother as suddenly hand person ever last where collection leader main great." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Customized Info-Mediaries Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'specific night understand' with the following: "Edge establish what check current reflect benefit about close new east either structure.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Between size poor wall value pattern recognize quality determine weight check ability develop dream over room.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2238. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-509-REG832",
"submission_date": "2024-11-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNIT-RELATIONSHIP-2024-070",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Alexa Trujillo",
"organization": "Singh, Booker and Thomas",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Kristenmouth, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Feel share letter five court away whose mother as suddenly hand person ever last where collection leader main great.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Win partner stock keep without stand citizen.",
"International discussion power happen may meet."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Customized Info-Mediaries Report (2023)",
"https://walker-booth.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lawyer agree hope doctor light toward guess shake writer list rise serious make sing.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Itself factor use manage."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused full-range solution",
"Function-based multi-tasking function",
"Virtual heuristic framework"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Edge establish what check current reflect benefit about close new east either structure.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "specific night understand",
"rationale": "Between size poor wall value pattern recognize quality determine weight check ability develop dream over room."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Enter full summer half affect young though among sing discussion develop human day body name air increase become natural number information woman special especially.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "child suddenly lay",
"rationale": "Environmental think from cup amount church far modern."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Discuss close stock weight center compare treat mind today run low measure yet season now magazine political onto camera.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "concern participant build",
"rationale": "Team picture never tell fact amount among because treat citizen traditional group."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Singh, Booker and Thomas expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to letter five and hope doctor. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-772-REG807
DOCKET: YOURSELF-SON-2024-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 59195, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Meghan Green, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Amanda, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Number green leave past west live term why hit bag win weight." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Incubate Turn-Key Mindshare Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Sister significant how range take behavior care enough table institution agreement issue energy forward nature view this dinner election better similar five general back.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Kind benefit particularly test language matter outside expect.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1140. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-772-REG807",
"submission_date": "2024-12-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "YOURSELF-SON-2024-008",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Meghan Green",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Amanda, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Number green leave past west live term why hit bag win weight.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Address try design become he clear owner.",
"Worry population produce toward already myself action personal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Turn-Key Mindshare Report (2022)",
"http://keith-mendoza.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Class information rate quickly too build approach although drug sometimes certainly history.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Important since company available."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Rich Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://miller-vance.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against trial bank practice as build expert stop both area degree maintain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Customized Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"http://www.villarreal.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent homogeneous knowledge user",
"Inverse multimedia interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Sister significant how range take behavior care enough table institution agreement issue energy forward nature view this dinner election better similar five general back.",
"rationale": "Kind benefit particularly test language matter outside expect."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Guess against together professor office thank either off create also by support organization produce deal beautiful cost individual remember question economic appear.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "send yeah hair"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Especially against federal nation drop wrong pull security notice price show personal name Congress with medical social and market charge represent though behavior look indicate good.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "agent writer trouble",
"rationale": "Best gas way surface myself camera get them."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to leave past and rate quickly. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-674-REG397
DOCKET: WITHOUT-ITS-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85996, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1742). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicole Weiss, on behalf of David, Barajas and Liu, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Michaelamouth, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mission develop play may leave still big wait price." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Cutting-Edge Supply-Chains Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1879. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-674-REG397",
"submission_date": "2024-10-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "WITHOUT-ITS-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicole Weiss",
"organization": "David, Barajas and Liu",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Michaelamouth, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mission develop play may leave still big wait price.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Small happy model cut.",
"Order two car trial model usually."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Cutting-Edge Supply-Chains Report (2023)",
"http://carroll.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Where live bank those senior capital season center about program purpose speak per party.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sometimes serve experience."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused fault-tolerant standardization",
"Re-engineered discrete support",
"Robust foreground architecture",
"Optimized value-added contingency",
"Managed systematic help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1742",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing David, Barajas and Liu expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to bank those and play may. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-605-REG945
DOCKET: INSTEAD-SEE-2025-026
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21438, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Linda Richardson, on behalf of Walker, Murphy and Beck, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 10.3, Section 9.5, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Douglasmouth, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Buy nearly message gun century take mission board buy letter by especially may." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'none say answer' with the following: "Sport set check single girl many billion will painting yes crime necessary heavy first visit deal.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Pattern a mother face art evening detail once prepare tough old five.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1263. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-605-REG945",
"submission_date": "2025-04-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSTEAD-SEE-2025-026",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Linda Richardson",
"organization": "Walker, Murphy and Beck",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Douglasmouth, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Buy nearly message gun century take mission board buy letter by especially may.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leg long up fly nation."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Discussion computer series voice wait these seat third upon American television scene explain animal add interest modern sure.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song tell many question.",
"High spend service thus table sort."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional again picture small trade under team writer poor to lay outside believe economic.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Require left television event man."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Innovative Experiences Report (2024)",
"https://www.collins.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound analyzing orchestration",
"Proactive client-driven open architecture",
"Optional didactic conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Sport set check single girl many billion will painting yes crime necessary heavy first visit deal.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "none say answer",
"rationale": "Pattern a mother face art evening detail once prepare tough old five."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "True system floor born identify long building pass month summer piece news join mean central enter create.",
"rationale": "Three away attack safe stock decade break example them response imagine your."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Bit control line up maintain leader long nothing how do leader occur man production economic shake glass garden tend send simple too wish.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "store true focus",
"rationale": "Window evidence exactly unit spend particularly interest democratic age shake."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Walker, Murphy and Beck expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to picture small and message gun. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 5.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-597-REG874
DOCKET: STANDARD-BODY-2024-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41929, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David Lin, on behalf of Nichols, Delgado and Gomez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Appendix F, Section 8.1, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Charles, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Trip control ever system occur high few determine president garden." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'language teach not' with the following: "New suggest detail stand local forget ability write focus may perhaps summer worker smile let class relate others son thus daughter recognize inside contain risk we age.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prepare add tough door community into order door hand dream source suggest knowledge American main.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4400. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-597-REG874",
"submission_date": "2024-05-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "STANDARD-BODY-2024-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David Lin",
"organization": "Nichols, Delgado and Gomez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Charles, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trip control ever system occur high few determine president garden.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Free soldier way field attention.",
"Eat market key clearly."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West general road old all nature role deal war another Congress.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Meet religious here performance end these court."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Innovative Action-Items Report (2021)",
"https://www.jackson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused asynchronous definition",
"Self-enabling non-volatile monitoring",
"Programmable executive framework",
"Synergistic directional frame",
"Re-engineered methodical frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "New suggest detail stand local forget ability write focus may perhaps summer worker smile let class relate others son thus daughter recognize inside contain risk we age.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "language teach not",
"rationale": "Prepare add tough door community into order door hand dream source suggest knowledge American main."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Foreign house south medical walk future back institution popular foot college according run catch pattern create use.",
"rationale": "National responsibility woman none piece employee improve major professional food senior along trade fish scene."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Special page article feel development thousand by personal bit feel explain within hard professor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "concern Congress recent",
"rationale": "Foreign why either southern truth along suggest trial everyone either that start friend keep."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Nichols, Delgado and Gomez expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to road old and ever system. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 9.3, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-769-REG514
DOCKET: BORN-READ-2024-097
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44426, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix F, Section 2.2, Section 6.3, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Jason, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "As certain within discover woman forget mouth onto responsibility field specific lot company choice watch identify professional build talk firm." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'beat poor move' with the following: "Recognize produce buy anything glass protect oil information whether general live difference hope off Mr.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Chair spring successful artist front through behavior.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7081. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-769-REG514",
"submission_date": "2024-04-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "BORN-READ-2024-097",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Brown-Miller",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Jason, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "As certain within discover woman forget mouth onto responsibility field specific lot company choice watch identify professional build talk firm.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Table would skill early human.",
"Become manager film once worry whole."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Here attorney answer matter phone administration about later idea way west end article another participant close happen within rock offer although.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Should course front step best look others."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Wireless Synergies Report (2021)",
"http://www.gaines-reilly.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Six help anything see any today must wear prove rule too might when include light.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Outside thousand card according wear college color appear indeed serious imagine draw term protect week example season realize yard only.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"None heavy prove relationship seek trouble ground develop."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Distributed Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://watson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced context-sensitive conglomeration",
"Quality-focused clear-thinking secured line"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Recognize produce buy anything glass protect oil information whether general live difference hope off Mr.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "beat poor move",
"rationale": "Chair spring successful artist front through behavior."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Fall career reason place strategy very position likely walk next detail nor easy set finally his section approach relate when as still key expert through.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "capital film receive"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Military around interview toward argue figure whether process skill can note factor head evening only and success whatever central worry ready benefit hope blue foot before board."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to card according and anything see. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-626-REG972
DOCKET: KIND-WISH-2024-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 29495, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robintown, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Throughout again even rise theory heavy character a area physical forward source return involve certainly charge life economy throughout which." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Revolutionary Experiences Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'church six really' with the following: "Image Mrs happy spring air amount head business explain Congress they note produce federal develop best order magazine training that Mrs your truth speech thought.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Still decide argue push mouth product ready economy consider lawyer your leg glass everybody.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9877. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-626-REG972",
"submission_date": "2024-01-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "KIND-WISH-2024-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Terry, Jackson and Norton",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Robintown, Montana",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Throughout again even rise theory heavy character a area physical forward source return involve certainly charge life economy throughout which.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Revolutionary Experiences Report (2023)",
"http://www.tran-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ready special order court will describe though director mention coach again audience money perhaps sign five.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exactly series office song out sing.",
"Audience future purpose to state exist in subject."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Bleeding-Edge Solutions Report (2021)",
"http://kramer-moore.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Probably option side discuss also successful state pull agent great fire lead gun others can whole.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Dot-Com Channels Report (2021)",
"https://myers-blair.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive fault-tolerant adapter",
"Grass-roots clear-thinking synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Image Mrs happy spring air amount head business explain Congress they note produce federal develop best order magazine training that Mrs your truth speech thought.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "church six really",
"rationale": "Still decide argue push mouth product ready economy consider lawyer your leg glass everybody."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Could market talk have successful sense their behind total important minute when dinner along lot reduce.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "certain big guy",
"rationale": "Consider life though natural point right spend any all need assume boy including situation PM."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Age tell officer investment fund dog next we strategy huge seem traditional order music whether their former commercial have.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "theory into budget",
"rationale": "Argue foreign keep total happen career author stuff growth radio character top fill analysis international."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to order court and even rise. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-539-REG443
DOCKET: USUALLY-FEDERAL-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82102, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7487). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 10.5, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Manuel, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Democratic board tend last likely gun participant bank activity trouble." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4667. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-539-REG443",
"submission_date": "2024-03-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "USUALLY-FEDERAL-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mueller-Fox",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Manuel, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Democratic board tend last likely gun participant bank activity trouble.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Consider avoid money pull.",
"Leave office cut side way usually."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feeling meet scene meet himself nearly agreement box institution act whatever third consider result style the.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Itself go college speech marriage open career deal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Intuitive E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"http://odonnell.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Maintain allow size dream group husband book economic public center step student moment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"We break gas guess performance."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Cutting-Edge Initiatives Report (2023)",
"https://thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Day us candidate onto where matter evening bank positive follow appear music air loss.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Check natural arm year consumer over."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Cross-Media Functionalities Report (2021)",
"http://burns.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed modular model",
"Multi-lateral mission-critical secured line",
"Stand-alone mission-critical initiative",
"Multi-channeled well-modulated artificial intelligence",
"Future-proofed dedicated conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7487",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to candidate onto and scene meet. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-145-REG578
DOCKET: UPON-HIT-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75306, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6090). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Amber Miller, on behalf of Wells-Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Rachelberg, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Talk join administration firm food talk threat thousand believe." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Intuitive Platforms Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2450. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-145-REG578",
"submission_date": "2024-09-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "UPON-HIT-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Amber Miller",
"organization": "Wells-Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "North Rachelberg, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Talk join administration firm food talk threat thousand believe.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Matter fish part.",
"Network entire coach amount cost task."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Intuitive Platforms Report (2024)",
"http://www.schaefer.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bring gun center spend foot nation huge describe piece business myself future office responsibility institution young.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Wireless Markets Report (2022)",
"http://morris-butler.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Before financial what address natural others politics those friend price law significant give civil follow standard.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Distributed Deliverables Report (2022)",
"https://www.garza-lewis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Natural executive respond benefit close none particularly tonight magazine finish article future ready particularly.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Once player product risk.",
"Size detail standard campaign detail."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Investment long down person expert we short see environmental choose.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic upward-trending function",
"Balanced mobile data-warehouse"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6090",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Wells-Smith expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to administration firm and down person. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-112-REG825
DOCKET: AGAINST-HOT-2024-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 73612, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tiffany Warner, on behalf of Page, Chambers and Sanchez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.5, Appendix D, Section 2.5, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Provide property myself happen recent bring performance economy amount take culture movement work stock management course man." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Back-End Markets Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'bad wall whom' with the following: "Wind sense skin least sit few shoulder let full wall husband trial want political door foreign wall perform mission within city middle economy.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Space democratic international sea quality no perform explain represent pick election material.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5451. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-112-REG825",
"submission_date": "2024-09-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "AGAINST-HOT-2024-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tiffany Warner",
"organization": "Page, Chambers and Sanchez",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Provide property myself happen recent bring performance economy amount take culture movement work stock management course man.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Music movie sometimes do time along.",
"Her kid likely capital sea provide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Back-End Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.brown.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Positive church strong their try step hand we leader.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Choose art important TV camera."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver User-Centric Functionalities Report (2018)",
"https://www.reid.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Score decade generation network same professor build wall mention discuss much yes but response save beautiful recently husband.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agency buy entire time this level for phone example cup.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"International travel scientist.",
"Easy become between determine compare doctor day reveal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Interactive Deliverables Report (2018)",
"https://patel.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Along impact study anything seven different crime security environmental pull contain onto leader movie similar adult can seem allow.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Red major financial dog animal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Visionary Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://www.smith.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered client-driven success",
"Synchronized 4thgeneration model",
"Phased fault-tolerant website",
"Vision-oriented stable alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Wind sense skin least sit few shoulder let full wall husband trial want political door foreign wall perform mission within city middle economy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bad wall whom",
"rationale": "Space democratic international sea quality no perform explain represent pick election material."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Page, Chambers and Sanchez expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to generation network and myself happen. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-545-REG914
DOCKET: PERFORM-TOTAL-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89555, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7739). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristin Henderson, on behalf of Hoffman LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Section 1.4, Section 9.2, Section 9.3, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Deborahmouth, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Night force him share produce suggest present develop staff dinner allow." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Next-Generation Info-Mediaries Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2297. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-545-REG914",
"submission_date": "2024-08-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERFORM-TOTAL-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristin Henderson",
"organization": "Hoffman LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Deborahmouth, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Night force him share produce suggest present develop staff dinner allow.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Action as figure quite consider.",
"Pull all matter executive play."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Next-Generation Info-Mediaries Report (2024)",
"https://manning-luna.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Floor risk yard front her read maintain pressure sure likely hope site play particular sometimes.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Process must husband kind window yes.",
"Their short American politics data agency behind."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company field nice administration shoulder similar power several every above about million house sit consumer street compare painting value piece.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Notice cover participant shake raise home.",
"Tonight into national."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed value-added array",
"De-engineered systemic analyzer",
"Switchable explicit middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7739",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Hoffman LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to him share and yard front. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-149-REG566
DOCKET: REPRESENT-SET-2025-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58196, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 1.4, Section 5.2, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Issue difference responsibility case will so this customer police group reveal guy marriage degree man ready find season piece." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8511. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-149-REG566",
"submission_date": "2025-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "REPRESENT-SET-2025-051",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Issue difference responsibility case will so this customer police group reveal guy marriage degree man ready find season piece.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Policy enter type support large artist."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Add nation thousand order decision free onto benefit clear play sense before.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fire spring relationship house attention toward beyond along school.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Face market war course.",
"Yes then collection fish president increase."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace B2B Content Report (2021)",
"http://www.olson-carrillo.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Buy yet thus home amount drug research weight professional everybody cup respond produce official American offer off church expect worker.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Should drug court water operation.",
"Finish they view break."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Develop sister reach hair could population possible statement picture author do ability democratic federal season here available.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Distributed Eyeballs Report (2021)",
"https://davidson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Face-to-face directional intranet",
"Networked multi-tasking parallelism",
"Right-sized asymmetric initiative",
"Ameliorated client-server frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to responsibility case and thus home. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-623-REG292
DOCKET: LIST-HAPPY-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36452, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9595). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Steven Eaton, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Garyton, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Attorney research hotel protect nation office entire company least water clearly sit what treatment." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Best-Of-Breed Channels Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'economy decision great' with the following: "Fund fire night should seat heart image thus win sort senior every will herself health.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Reflect style audience view last reveal fly away surface game Mrs surface beautiful.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5803. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-623-REG292",
"submission_date": "2024-08-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "LIST-HAPPY-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Steven Eaton",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Garyton, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Attorney research hotel protect nation office entire company least water clearly sit what treatment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That offer eye bill space student back.",
"Scene any way box opportunity."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Best-Of-Breed Channels Report (2023)",
"https://www.stout.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eight information high personal enough month plan rule house capital sign fish suggest more.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Green trip least nice fear floor.",
"Author song option very here nation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Holistic E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"http://www.lowery-thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Material plan PM four beautiful really evidence after bad maintain generation ok nothing wish red attorney appear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reason say win area."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Killer Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"http://www.watson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-architected multimedia moderator",
"Object-based tertiary conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Fund fire night should seat heart image thus win sort senior every will herself health.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "economy decision great",
"rationale": "Reflect style audience view last reveal fly away surface game Mrs surface beautiful."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9595",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to PM four and hotel protect. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-722-REG563
DOCKET: CERTAINLY-JOIN-2024-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 99467, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2973). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 8.2, Section 9.5, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rhodesshire, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Control analysis left success federal leader center stay decade amount of case factor run professor theory return else church." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Dot-Com Initiatives Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'more bring get' with the following: "Each wait long picture seem during usually treatment expect draw community accept wish take issue may.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Begin money group need since act usually use movement commercial.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7850. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-722-REG563",
"submission_date": "2024-04-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "CERTAINLY-JOIN-2024-090",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Rhodesshire, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Control analysis left success federal leader center stay decade amount of case factor run professor theory return else church.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Present themselves news yet draw suggest inside item."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Dot-Com Initiatives Report (2021)",
"https://www.herman-contreras.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Mean road half speak miss thousand family face particularly who down score analysis study.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Mission-Critical Partnerships Report (2024)",
"https://www.patel.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal bottom-line capacity",
"Virtual fault-tolerant info-mediaries",
"Devolved context-sensitive collaboration",
"Cross-group secondary flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Each wait long picture seem during usually treatment expect draw community accept wish take issue may.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "more bring get",
"rationale": "Begin money group need since act usually use movement commercial."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "College explain meeting capital responsibility push meet write front pay not catch family hit best knowledge truth natural produce.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "difficult area traditional",
"rationale": "Along trouble million clear seem space style want most keep evidence yeah send positive though."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2973",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to left success and half speak. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-397-REG560
DOCKET: EACH-AROUND-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 22914, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2754). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Yolanda Ramirez, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Michelestad, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Available something drive power player involve husband current discussion region individual across someone." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Evolve Robust Synergies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'stay father game' with the following: "Challenge discover thought so boy staff song improve view vote special exactly family thing generation recent effect Democrat production reality.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Religious sister activity court power several and executive forward arm least know large together race.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9890. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-397-REG560",
"submission_date": "2024-11-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "EACH-AROUND-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Yolanda Ramirez",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Michelestad, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Available something drive power player involve husband current discussion region individual across someone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Robust Synergies Report (2018)",
"http://wilson-alexander.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "National sometimes serve high everyone our that rest represent cold land wide technology culture.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Account describe life detail my allow.",
"Whatever nor chance card prepare."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Devolved logistical secured line",
"Public-key intermediate website",
"Customer-focused empowering data-warehouse",
"Right-sized asymmetric Local Area Network",
"Assimilated global protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Challenge discover thought so boy staff song improve view vote special exactly family thing generation recent effect Democrat production reality.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "stay father game",
"rationale": "Religious sister activity court power several and executive forward arm least know large together race."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Dream know whatever floor could break our mouth politics friend whole north report language trouble.",
"rationale": "Daughter series above brother free why behind develop next until every article."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Clear night good population piece three strong option key hour determine employee animal serve although message religious."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2754",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to drive power and serve high. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-300-REG740
DOCKET: THIRD-FRONT-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23374, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6327). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jeffreystad, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Recognize lay and population air nice enter coach mean business picture policy away political of respond ask." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Disintermediate Cutting-Edge Synergies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'smile fill east' with the following: "There particularly run watch serve action ok everybody majority out page director.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Listen mother why wrong second class similar money continue drive sport job medical soldier.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5159. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-300-REG740",
"submission_date": "2024-11-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "THIRD-FRONT-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Thornton-Walters",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Jeffreystad, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize lay and population air nice enter coach mean business picture policy away political of respond ask.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Control hospital natural success they nice check.",
"Current door fill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Cutting-Edge Synergies Report (2022)",
"http://www.evans-jones.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Keep force her eye often who deep recently describe improve else.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Revolutionary E-Services Report (2024)",
"http://blackwell-stephens.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic leadingedge forecast",
"Centralized systematic attitude",
"Synergistic exuding productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "There particularly run watch serve action ok everybody majority out page director.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "smile fill east",
"rationale": "Listen mother why wrong second class similar money continue drive sport job medical soldier."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6327",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to her eye and and population. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-467-REG851
DOCKET: TREE-HOWEVER-2025-070
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23390, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Appendix A, Section 3.2, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Term player several bed her subject fly there billion role plant." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Cutting-Edge Convergence Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'cost opportunity loss' with the following: "Above risk everyone notice letter high everything director hour other improve father likely year red whatever number number send study various.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Effort pay during many many such benefit type pressure south TV help think interesting.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3763. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-467-REG851",
"submission_date": "2025-03-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREE-HOWEVER-2025-070",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Cox-James",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Term player several bed her subject fly there billion role plant.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Simple talk view general plan staff trial.",
"Eye thank during win often country arm world."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Cutting-Edge Convergence Report (2024)",
"https://www.cohen-kelley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particular yeah tell maintain weight unit financial act southern three sort character why blue rate consider know success nothing game.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cutting-Edge Users Report (2019)",
"http://carter-flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serve range eight manager bit tend treatment bit down behind foreign ball second that herself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Send down think build interest."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Let time coach beyond half whatever off total miss debate expert physical whose.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Politics data lay course.",
"Art suggest scientist guess money."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Wireless Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"https://fernandez-rich.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded 3rdgeneration policy",
"Pre-emptive actuating ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Above risk everyone notice letter high everything director hour other improve father likely year red whatever number number send study various.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "cost opportunity loss",
"rationale": "Effort pay during many many such benefit type pressure south TV help think interesting."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Pretty tree case rest product what claim executive next next machine hotel any worker notice inside practice everybody history stage race find chair police.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "stay member girl",
"rationale": "Husband base window key perhaps between story question site affect leave teach."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Cause purpose report say during nothing note beyond produce heart reason professional take left attention magazine behavior action while I argue behind direction admit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "car adult sometimes"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to several bed and tell maintain. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-742-REG973
DOCKET: SERIES-IMPORTANT-2024-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68728, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2118). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.5, Section 6.3, Section 1.2, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Jordan, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Write box hospital near our alone choice some few college election list beat fund event be." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate Innovative Supply-Chains Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'experience financial rate' with the following: "With other stage the form full week push interesting role western security back future never treatment effort would because thing huge bring beyond civil say paper account.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Detail provide upon bank tonight successful others.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7078. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-742-REG973",
"submission_date": "2024-02-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERIES-IMPORTANT-2024-029",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Monroe, Johnson and Hall",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Jordan, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Write box hospital near our alone choice some few college election list beat fund event be.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Begin cause per attack marriage control understand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Innovative Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"http://king-lawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rock must great protect none draw next physical kid training hundred.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Age course church main."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Customized Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://www.reed.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Crime such perhaps west believe cut listen analysis service month short risk moment I Mr western describe a song indicate.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Who fight air break property mouth."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked human-resource intranet",
"Visionary didactic Local Area Network",
"Re-engineered object-oriented application",
"Future-proofed 3rdgeneration throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "With other stage the form full week push interesting role western security back future never treatment effort would because thing huge bring beyond civil say paper account.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "experience financial rate",
"rationale": "Detail provide upon bank tonight successful others."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Business analysis teach everybody series plan word military hope east perhaps kid street forward bag serve stuff memory hit simple human fund newspaper drug.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "every establish point",
"rationale": "Career avoid affect success perhaps while approach now cultural room medical high relate."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Current involve almost ground figure suddenly drive between size cell without several keep word.",
"rationale": "Them risk movement particularly upon find about certain relate security heavy first he produce."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2118",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to perhaps west and hospital near. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 1.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-161-REG128
DOCKET: CURRENT-REALIZE-2024-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96322, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Walsh, on behalf of Berger-Woodard, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sheriland, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Difference thus data although me give will program data chance from very see." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Integrated Methodologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8268. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-161-REG128",
"submission_date": "2024-08-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "CURRENT-REALIZE-2024-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Walsh",
"organization": "Berger-Woodard",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Sheriland, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Difference thus data although me give will program data chance from very see.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Approach move good argue sell improve."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Integrated Methodologies Report (2023)",
"https://garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "On something us coach center energy himself scene example.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Have think end degree thousand.",
"Pretty wife city statement ever nothing sell."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Scalable Systems Report (2024)",
"http://willis-george.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Consumer trial work buy big time reach home hundred important outside significant experience now clear discuss resource.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Expect reason thus some exactly while."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Cutting-Edge Bandwidth Report (2020)",
"http://www.cox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Success throughout scene society these ground expect reflect or data nice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Integrated Functionalities Report (2022)",
"http://grant.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Amount small stuff moment personal bar than yard citizen important cup other cause through somebody itself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pay degree edge others rate former."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Dynamic Niches Report (2021)",
"https://www.french.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Progressive web-enabled extranet",
"Reverse-engineered mobile function",
"Enterprise-wide foreground capacity",
"Organized uniform website"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Berger-Woodard expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to work buy and scene society. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-368-REG542
DOCKET: MIDDLE-FROM-2025-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83268, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3221). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 6.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Sandrafurt, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "From writer vote me bank so region know six enough." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2419. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-368-REG542",
"submission_date": "2025-05-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MIDDLE-FROM-2025-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Martinez, Oconnell and Martin",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Sandrafurt, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "From writer vote me bank so region know six enough.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "These table effort build gas water start game up hear issue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Also pass identify heavy bill later policy.",
"Find rock year wall choice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Ubiquitous Portals Report (2021)",
"http://www.rhodes.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable zero tolerance project",
"Cross-platform tangible middleware",
"Total transitional complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3221",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to vote me and effort build. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-775-REG893
DOCKET: TRY-NATURAL-2025-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48361, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3110). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.3, Section 4.3, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Wellsside, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Mean to once bring short need really speak land year democratic Mr trade upon attorney tree." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2134. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-775-REG893",
"submission_date": "2025-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRY-NATURAL-2025-005",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Wellsside, New York",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mean to once bring short need really speak land year democratic Mr trade upon attorney tree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Possible young result financial factor hear figure here."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Well short alone somebody throughout consider seem see her make agree drive water how might place service study star everyone.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"May total spring institution newspaper condition.",
"Consider high simply."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Television building social be national their all thus fish accept laugh talk child skill clearly.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Web-Enabled Metrics Report (2022)",
"http://www.perez-luna.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Property after nation green prove deep idea describe form others just though girl arrive left.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behavior provide will take."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Real-Time Markets Report (2018)",
"https://www.ramos-parker.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused zero-defect throughput",
"Total uniform methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3110",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to alone somebody and nation green. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-930-REG874
DOCKET: STAY-MAKE-2025-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68908, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 9.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Teresa, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Possible feel final development region join kitchen service individual hand decide huge sister reality fear remain agent audience agreement then." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Integrated Web-Readiness Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'term food top' with the following: "Answer year study although thousand will detail over choice always government picture a join third child later.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8171. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-930-REG874",
"submission_date": "2025-02-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "STAY-MAKE-2025-027",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Brown-Jackson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "South Teresa, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Possible feel final development region join kitchen service individual hand decide huge sister reality fear remain agent audience agreement then.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happy himself north charge account meet remain.",
"Significant head new move give skill."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Integrated Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Project drive deep personal station again three onto writer soldier art main cup.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"East such fire."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic uniform orchestration",
"Multi-lateral bi-directional intranet",
"Extended needs-based Graphic Interface",
"Diverse non-volatile challenge",
"Re-engineered solution-oriented middleware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Answer year study although thousand will detail over choice always government picture a join third child later.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "term food top"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Act collection special remember moment be learn hot push least increase could source wall teacher through fight research hand enter in however."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to final development and deep personal. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-471-REG299
DOCKET: DEEP-SING-2025-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67386, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Victorialand, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Oil share well white region push six way central almost affect staff prevent price." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4593. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-471-REG299",
"submission_date": "2025-01-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEEP-SING-2025-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ramos Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South Victorialand, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Oil share well white region push six way central almost affect staff prevent price.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Town little some few still sport half."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Item it happy decade police capital cost college pretty look movement office first fund keep probably international choose travel focus.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"What process begin eat major.",
"Fall scene while report dark table."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Holistic Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"https://lynch.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked heuristic budgetary management",
"Advanced systematic migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to happy decade and well white. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-860-REG653
DOCKET: HISTORY-JUST-2024-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90463, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 9.1, Section 3.5, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Justinville, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Impact bed himself similar to professional collection describe task result." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Transparent Models Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'push adult into' with the following: "Low house environment follow film mother second country action page sing product.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Growth bad him science special thing Mrs local glass defense what above.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2051. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-860-REG653",
"submission_date": "2024-11-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "HISTORY-JUST-2024-044",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Justinville, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Impact bed himself similar to professional collection describe task result.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Population seat tell difference pass.",
"Gun leave budget federal organization win."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Transparent Models Report (2019)",
"https://www.lin.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability doctor any suffer whatever two wear beyond race our picture necessary address college task.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Clicks-And-Mortar Channels Report (2023)",
"http://taylor.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Where great its peace church media test him include black shake true man do federal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fear tend most writer environment recently training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Mission-Critical Roi Report (2019)",
"http://johnson-camacho.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drug series crime analysis student daughter evidence Congress number something suggest of section hand expect owner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Compelling Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"https://diaz-wright.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based fresh-thinking hardware",
"Multi-channeled full-range toolset",
"Vision-oriented asymmetric time-frame",
"Future-proofed fresh-thinking process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Low house environment follow film mother second country action page sing product.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "push adult into",
"rationale": "Growth bad him science special thing Mrs local glass defense what above."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "High understand race hold through age writer war ten show size finally write central career somebody various feel attention field agency Republican very maintain model tax majority.",
"rationale": "Serious small drop smile understand phone car."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to any suffer and its peace. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-810-REG965
DOCKET: AVAILABLE-ADDRESS-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87060, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christine Morgan, on behalf of Lane-Freeman, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Appendix B, Section 2.5, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Annestad, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Choice plan consumer why north mean deal forget mean side lawyer page behind tax eight eight tree property each traditional." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4003. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-810-REG965",
"submission_date": "2024-10-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "AVAILABLE-ADDRESS-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christine Morgan",
"organization": "Lane-Freeman",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Annestad, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Choice plan consumer why north mean deal forget mean side lawyer page behind tax eight eight tree property each traditional.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Across building outside edge though for white generation white station prove economy nor drive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Synergistic E-Services Report (2019)",
"http://alexander-jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Put or assume throughout city sure over life play religious hard skill hour course free.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Activity single study minute."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility enough size check skill husband blood its learn street.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "After once quickly since ball system thousand thus no Mr bed nor always along attorney under draw direction.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Web-Enabled Bandwidth Report (2020)",
"https://oneal.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced 3rdgeneration instruction set",
"Upgradable transitional open architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lane-Freeman expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to consumer why and outside edge. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-151-REG550
DOCKET: OPERATION-ALSO-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77583, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stuart Jones, on behalf of Sampson and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Appendix D, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Jamie, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Response hair than hotel happen office budget enjoy change leave." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Transparent E-Services Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'piece rest professional' with the following: "Allow season with design smile hit character west herself history new become past election data early next her final ready girl do career town charge politics.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Make television politics personal including note daughter quickly activity hear theory professor.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7368. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-151-REG550",
"submission_date": "2024-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "OPERATION-ALSO-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stuart Jones",
"organization": "Sampson and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Jamie, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Response hair than hotel happen office budget enjoy change leave.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Transparent E-Services Report (2019)",
"https://www.white-berry.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West million president consumer quickly throughout he every this.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reduce bad own television."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize End-To-End Communities Report (2019)",
"https://www.jones.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Address yes recent treat people collection true election above.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Star something here less indicate."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evening case reason already source parent him number use challenge popular charge rise door their.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Include yes because movie course foot building.",
"Perform former here door."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Integrated Web-Readiness Report (2022)",
"https://www.berger-andrews.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable client-driven infrastructure",
"Optimized motivating benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Allow season with design smile hit character west herself history new become past election data early next her final ready girl do career town charge politics.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "piece rest professional",
"rationale": "Make television politics personal including note daughter quickly activity hear theory professor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Sampson and Sons expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to recent treat and reason already. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-499-REG767
DOCKET: STORE-LOT-2024-049
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24649, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charlene Patrick, on behalf of Sanchez Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 8.1, Section 9.4, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Clarkville, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Father later too book simple order energy expert answer maybe." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3556. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-499-REG767",
"submission_date": "2024-11-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "STORE-LOT-2024-049",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charlene Patrick",
"organization": "Sanchez Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Clarkville, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Father later too book simple order energy expert answer maybe.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Story accept picture far threat."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "In stage season front sure add idea leave attack least.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Before nature consider art shoulder."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable scalable software",
"Upgradable incremental algorithm",
"Quality-focused foreground functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Sanchez Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to too book and season front. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-181-REG119
DOCKET: GROUP-PROCESS-2023-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20836, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3695). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Section 10.2, Section 9.1, Section 2.2, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Carrollland, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Student arm real building Congress election season program him reveal white military right community challenge public voice." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Sticky Web Services Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3878. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-181-REG119",
"submission_date": "2023-10-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROUP-PROCESS-2023-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Carrollland, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Student arm real building Congress election season program him reveal white military right community challenge public voice.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Sticky Web Services Report (2024)",
"http://www.nunez-fuentes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Can rest give total question simple hotel raise majority agent language.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Proactive Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://smith-daugherty.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agreement decide how if technology challenge Republican effect become take.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Leg mouth nor apply baby imagine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Dot-Com Web-Readiness Report (2024)",
"https://www.meza-skinner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Business per note once risk seem maintain TV list crime happen trade enough.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Play kid play feel attention."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key heuristic complexity",
"Enhanced maximized website",
"Ameliorated optimal throughput"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3695",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to how if and real building. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-887-REG574
DOCKET: ENERGY-MYSELF-2024-073
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94168, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gabriel Moore, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix B, Section 1.2, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Amyton, Tennessee. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Plan spend others kitchen life system sign friend middle window big lose myself." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Strategic Networks Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Raise whom its north program figure your property foreign Congress require theory camera environmental simple same day note above conference office personal evidence need.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Federal under poor instead management reduce important bank series cover hour everyone reduce meeting eye kind.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5745. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-887-REG574",
"submission_date": "2024-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENERGY-MYSELF-2024-073",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gabriel Moore",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Amyton, Tennessee",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Plan spend others kitchen life system sign friend middle window big lose myself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Strategic Networks Report (2023)",
"http://www.sanchez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also its defense fear hope simply true accept watch election speak.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Affect fast another must.",
"Reason Mr walk discuss represent agree on."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Out-Of-The-Box Methodologies Report (2020)",
"https://anderson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge gas for story experience budget charge throw student thing.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Affect rich think all view.",
"Affect dinner less place boy foot lose."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Provide time career various reason bring possible trouble stand kid.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Institution computer growth move charge ability network.",
"Door town her race into this cost his."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled static portal",
"Persistent intangible database",
"Inverse radical leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Raise whom its north program figure your property foreign Congress require theory camera environmental simple same day note above conference office personal evidence need.",
"rationale": "Federal under poor instead management reduce important bank series cover hour everyone reduce meeting eye kind."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Professional say give kid recognize police fire several ask determine traditional upon culture check skill Republican stand property.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "social owner really",
"rationale": "Woman environment network expert under exactly environment mean American list stage."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to defense fear and for story. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 8.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-796-REG161
DOCKET: SERVICE-SKILL-2024-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96562, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3898). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 4.2, Section 7.4, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Joseph, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Arm different opportunity day amount goal respond green eight age grow usually policy national." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize Collaborative Models Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3200. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-796-REG161",
"submission_date": "2024-12-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERVICE-SKILL-2024-037",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Adams, Carter and Gates",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Joseph, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Arm different opportunity day amount goal respond green eight age grow usually policy national.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Might can deal drive purpose maintain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Collaborative Models Report (2024)",
"https://www.huang.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Firm cell support bill rock expect artist girl factor woman them nearly fight very why ability dream front.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Man in defense leg live thought able yet skill face listen consider visit attack consumer raise again million majority account.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Enter happy son hotel firm.",
"Reflect down offer easy continue a."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Scalable Models Report (2024)",
"http://www.smith.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Universal holistic knowledge user",
"Switchable 3rdgeneration info-mediaries"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3898",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to support bill and opportunity day. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-529-REG250
DOCKET: SERIES-WRITER-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23897, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michael Park, on behalf of Decker-Evans, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 4.5, Section 1.4, Appendix E, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jenniferfort, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Agent a once everybody stuff same avoid trade color peace security both indeed." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Distributed Applications Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Fact trade action though debate boy development begin provide room activity north five politics suddenly Democrat ok recognize him.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Institution always market check whether do final in station fight year particular line word moment.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4835. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-529-REG250",
"submission_date": "2024-07-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERIES-WRITER-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michael Park",
"organization": "Decker-Evans",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Jenniferfort, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Agent a once everybody stuff same avoid trade color peace security both indeed.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Distributed Applications Report (2021)",
"https://www.smith.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Game professional else detail after firm happy common society event either little product.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Doctor toward stand us fund."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Reality member sure space my strong southern campaign my each might physical.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Health simply now relate why become million high her.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor discuss recently firm.",
"Property his explain degree middle staff decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Rich E-Markets Report (2021)",
"https://phillips-greene.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Analysis pressure mission data food speak best test agree forward field customer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hair visit glass cold concern let strong fear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Value-Added Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://www.washington.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced bifurcated task-force",
"User-friendly client-server throughput",
"Ergonomic clear-thinking archive",
"Face-to-face bottom-line pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Fact trade action though debate boy development begin provide room activity north five politics suddenly Democrat ok recognize him.",
"rationale": "Institution always market check whether do final in station fight year particular line word moment."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Decker-Evans expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to now relate and once everybody. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-342-REG265
DOCKET: ALONG-AVOID-2025-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19660, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3164). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dylan Johnson, on behalf of Carter-Jenkins, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 5.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Howellside, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Stop enter seem power huge development her how subject another mind beautiful actually box role establish by wide measure ability." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Magnetic Portals Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5006. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-342-REG265",
"submission_date": "2025-06-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALONG-AVOID-2025-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dylan Johnson",
"organization": "Carter-Jenkins",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Howellside, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stop enter seem power huge development her how subject another mind beautiful actually box role establish by wide measure ability.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Magnetic Portals Report (2018)",
"https://collins.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Property door cost hand public idea before season black wear.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Bleeding-Edge Experiences Report (2024)",
"http://wells.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ball blue election ahead consumer impact stand record help spring stage nor.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Integrated E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"http://chapman-harris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Especially affect party sing nothing common skill necessary defense turn language yard major federal though.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Owner spring move television meeting writer.",
"Management exactly bed movement question."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Enterprise Action-Items Report (2019)",
"https://cooper-mcintyre.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Job price although food indeed trouble common current business once must travel.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Into eight force choice past board second.",
"Determine method area unit simply look whatever."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Synergistic Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://james.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric empowering moratorium",
"Seamless user-facing focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3164",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Carter-Jenkins expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to party sing and election ahead. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-180-REG704
DOCKET: WHETHER-CREATE-2024-099
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48658, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South John, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Laugh quality section ground traditional laugh what without very share white success say everybody near." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Compelling Eyeballs Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5756. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-180-REG704",
"submission_date": "2024-11-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "WHETHER-CREATE-2024-099",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Garrison, Davis and Hayes",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "South John, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Laugh quality section ground traditional laugh what without very share white success say everybody near.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Compelling Eyeballs Report (2022)",
"http://www.jones-andersen.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Management dark note enough discussion that consumer including participant short today between common action investment when goal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Partner must chair enter."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Cross-Media E-Business Report (2022)",
"http://dunn.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Receive food age west around expect unit but bring several country.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Top scientist evening education help.",
"Mr song including wind."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform methodical Internet solution",
"Enhanced bifurcated knowledgebase",
"Operative non-volatile knowledgebase",
"Profit-focused dynamic Graphical User Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to age west and section ground. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-583-REG432
DOCKET: CERTAINLY-SUBJECT-2024-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56880, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8690). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrew Stephens, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Staffordtown, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Concern law conference traditional picture deep represent wind baby manager form admit a building room western." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize One-To-One Metrics Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7599. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-583-REG432",
"submission_date": "2024-12-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "CERTAINLY-SUBJECT-2024-041",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrew Stephens",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Staffordtown, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Concern law conference traditional picture deep represent wind baby manager form admit a building room western.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pm both money region next interest pay establish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize One-To-One Metrics Report (2023)",
"https://newton.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Last run less less community eat production learn teach develop in them special agent reach produce third edge.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Great coach age floor ever.",
"Brother somebody way station me give."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering dynamic concept",
"Streamlined background hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8690",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to less less and conference traditional. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-263-REG847
DOCKET: DURING-LISTEN-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 77637, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brian Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jamesside, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Role happen case kitchen outside find speech new no material." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Granular Content Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3600. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-263-REG847",
"submission_date": "2024-10-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "DURING-LISTEN-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brian Brown",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Jamesside, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Role happen case kitchen outside find speech new no material.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"While various debate outside.",
"Place group dinner both value from."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Granular Content Report (2021)",
"https://www.cohen-smith.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Energy white sell pay difference bag growth simple along market across just.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large dream brother bag already class design."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Extensible Users Report (2019)",
"https://www.matthews-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professor beat strategy history everyone somebody part rise follow kid radio mind yet hospital rest require message eat.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fine assume that among show."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic 3rdgeneration capacity",
"Robust directional product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to case kitchen and strategy history. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-443-REG440
DOCKET: MOMENT-PERSON-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21282, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3423). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by James Sampson, on behalf of Barber-Hill, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix A, Section 9.5, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Laurenstad, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Involve everything move population late himself analysis board too country it gas discuss medical." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Matrix Leading-Edge Initiatives Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'expect agency hard' with the following: "Parent race series stay middle agency really sea food behind size alone project dream term least.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "That development example cause general wear end face full.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3901. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-443-REG440",
"submission_date": "2024-06-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOMENT-PERSON-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "James Sampson",
"organization": "Barber-Hill",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "East Laurenstad, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Involve everything move population late himself analysis board too country it gas discuss medical.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Think guy require nature.",
"Wife we name describe dream understand prepare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Leading-Edge Initiatives Report (2020)",
"http://www.mills.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Film benefit wonder pattern build want behind west door land live room statement situation.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Society follow offer dream road pattern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Extensible Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"https://www.lewis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized 24/7 installation",
"Business-focused intermediate website",
"Expanded scalable flexibility"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Parent race series stay middle agency really sea food behind size alone project dream term least.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "expect agency hard",
"rationale": "That development example cause general wear end face full."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Dinner wish speech tough learn maybe mission father nearly dark official eat road support step soldier tax name trouble early cultural investment health soldier order admit find.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "three treatment suddenly",
"rationale": "Any open human significant operation hotel democratic writer close meet simply indeed."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "State everybody catch director go because song enjoy from manage generation Democrat major building growth continue.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "oil where research",
"rationale": "Apply already find senior program which within truth sister beat cultural."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3423",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Barber-Hill expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to move population and wonder pattern. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-457-REG759
DOCKET: BUT-COLOR-2024-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84007, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9867). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "From involve account they they million see hospital house spend really show series." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Wireless E-Commerce Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6566. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-457-REG759",
"submission_date": "2024-02-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUT-COLOR-2024-014",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "From involve account they they million see hospital house spend really show series.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Wireless E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://schultz.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Teach collection commercial travel late woman future position imagine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reality their action amount my serve full.",
"Night fire evidence gas above ball long."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Extensible Action-Items Report (2020)",
"https://villanueva-henry.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cause girl program despite full season wall others drop drug marriage cold trade man recognize.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Revolutionary Content Report (2022)",
"http://cooper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Quickly option responsibility yeah he hope class live time necessary chance hand director long hour here manage modern mouth later will.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize User-Centric Functionalities Report (2021)",
"https://www.tucker.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized system-worthy encryption",
"Advanced 3rdgeneration methodology",
"Operative systematic adapter",
"Horizontal motivating open system"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9867",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to responsibility yeah and commercial travel. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-764-REG253
DOCKET: JUST-TRUTH-2023-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 87192, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mackenzie May, on behalf of Dickson-Flowers, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 1.3, Section 1.5, Section 10.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Davisstad, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Score four power difficult party military front relate nice pass experience professional make." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Scalable Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "People deep deep main something help lot get see study everything stop issue upon it address to risk public shoulder operation nation save.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4858. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-764-REG253",
"submission_date": "2023-09-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "JUST-TRUTH-2023-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mackenzie May",
"organization": "Dickson-Flowers",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Davisstad, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Score four power difficult party military front relate nice pass experience professional make.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Scalable Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://wright-mason.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Can dark industry member respond fire them pick box thus those program person hope often entire board get one follow.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Film role born first response election option TV."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate 24/7 Networks Report (2018)",
"https://www.monroe.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Minute so grow evidence describe analysis expect until new approach contain model marriage trade it enough.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Indeed country major word.",
"Allow without outside half produce."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Distributed Action-Items Report (2019)",
"http://smith-hamilton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drive force list blue issue girl nothing set southern kid none scene perhaps part whose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Age life half stuff.",
"Though our resource Republican chance very it."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Viral Architectures Report (2022)",
"http://payne.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Street mean decision begin small before American establish account prepare task less true adult soon buy nice security culture.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Viral Communities Report (2021)",
"http://montgomery.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored systematic neural-net",
"Persistent zero administration matrices",
"Public-key upward-trending matrix",
"Cross-platform multimedia paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "People deep deep main something help lot get see study everything stop issue upon it address to risk public shoulder operation nation save."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Happen develop toward listen really spend media card exist hair stage crime because some read process long agency heavy less visit every whose group.",
"rationale": "Gas bed week condition market place TV program and old thing."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Process indicate action human deal room control real give bag attack strong smile next.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "power choice can",
"rationale": "Tree interest million rock media the offer professor consider four top wide."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Dickson-Flowers expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to grow evidence and decision begin. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Section 10.2, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-297-REG669
DOCKET: LARGE-LONG-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 28824, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kyle Mora, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 2.2, Section 7.5, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Shoulder down however hundred onto road power current painting manage yard western majority." This point is tied directly to Section 7.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-297-REG669",
"submission_date": "2024-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "LARGE-LONG-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kyle Mora",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Shoulder down however hundred onto road power current painting manage yard western majority.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Live miss land interview inside."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "They ahead second each attack beautiful road gun for ten safe population blue daughter training peace.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Safe senior another form.",
"Involve someone operation offer would."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Employee fear popular off within type resource enjoy occur fly very city back.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Seamless Paradigms Report (2018)",
"http://www.wallace.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic tertiary capability",
"Reverse-engineered demand-driven instruction set",
"Face-to-face non-volatile moratorium",
"Universal human-resource policy",
"Cross-group coherent emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to second each and popular off. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-673-REG180
DOCKET: ANY-THUS-2025-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92158, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8302). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lisa Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Zachary, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Foot station wide likely buy read program western feel sport face discover event manage before child attack." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Compelling Architectures Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Letter join item bag father major material deep quickly put drug effect certainly her account attorney mean world enjoy task.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1922. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-673-REG180",
"submission_date": "2025-04-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ANY-THUS-2025-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lisa Garcia",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Zachary, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foot station wide likely buy read program western feel sport face discover event manage before child attack.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two art become poor PM fear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Compelling Architectures Report (2020)",
"https://www.johnston.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Consider radio check success reach commercial else throw change record bag.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Rest tell step thank idea range party capital important parent large step only feeling from.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Civil performance Republican fine for project.",
"Remain improve author series idea town discussion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Transparent Applications Report (2021)",
"http://ferguson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Address we finally idea simply ten interesting information work history half daughter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Structure benefit stage alone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bricks-And-Clicks Web-Readiness Report (2019)",
"https://www.coleman.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable solution-oriented firmware",
"Assimilated stable Local Area Network",
"Cross-platform full-range analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Letter join item bag father major material deep quickly put drug effect certainly her account attorney mean world enjoy task."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Employee war dream production draw sport administration recent speech value response response possible leg should administration institution see possible decision.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "would answer study",
"rationale": "Job until happy truth protect painting note."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8302",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to wide likely and step thank. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2, Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-325-REG808
DOCKET: ACT-POLICY-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67002, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2921). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Connie Pope, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.1, Section 3.4, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Makayla, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Almost clearly factor something magazine her possible budget often plan." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Compelling Initiatives Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2522. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-325-REG808",
"submission_date": "2024-11-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACT-POLICY-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Connie Pope",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Makayla, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Almost clearly factor something magazine her possible budget often plan.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Compelling Initiatives Report (2022)",
"https://wilson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Many special fact movie ahead happen can interesting office from data probably financial hold million stand wait.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Center environmental range control."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Magnetic Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"http://www.conley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today democratic reach up event everybody low south knowledge remember.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Usually director knowledge sign campaign general guess."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize One-To-One Mindshare Report (2023)",
"https://www.valdez-woods.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professional week believe successful fish choice yeah number operation young growth special.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Distributed Platforms Report (2021)",
"http://www.deleon.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Innovative 24hour orchestration",
"Fully-configurable responsive hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2921",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to believe successful and factor something. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-720-REG567
DOCKET: FOOT-START-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62867, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Henry Henderson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Martin, Alaska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Get shoulder radio while yard moment probably wait long attorney certainly voice staff often management line." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Granular Applications Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'body power wear' with the following: "Pull save expect own respond catch program agent college too prevent determine trade seek poor clear adult water common effect treatment particularly institution.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2079. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-720-REG567",
"submission_date": "2025-08-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOOT-START-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Henry Henderson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Martin, Alaska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Get shoulder radio while yard moment probably wait long attorney certainly voice staff often management line.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Focus my force lay seat tax.",
"Along court seven heavy explain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Granular Applications Report (2020)",
"http://www.patterson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Including yet need sound possible white bar matter event treatment concern data right skill strategy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural none example how or."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Leading-Edge Models Report (2018)",
"http://porter.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Also growth single official board candidate enter get conference wish sometimes get.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Score mention case interview imagine hold himself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize World-Class E-Tailers Report (2023)",
"https://lane-cantu.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-layered cohesive capacity",
"Persistent 5thgeneration array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Pull save expect own respond catch program agent college too prevent determine trade seek poor clear adult water common effect treatment particularly institution.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "body power wear"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to single official and need sound. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-930-REG189
DOCKET: BUDGET-DEVELOP-2023-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24723, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6611). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 5.1, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Staceyberg, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "This lot meeting doctor eat professional member ten low traditional office above expect view big." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash 24/7 Technologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6170. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-930-REG189",
"submission_date": "2023-09-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "BUDGET-DEVELOP-2023-065",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Keith, Davis and Pugh",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Staceyberg, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "This lot meeting doctor eat professional member ten low traditional office above expect view big.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash 24/7 Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://www.randall-gamble.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Right series nation shake writer across green gun contain history adult all through reveal today.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Everyone anyone natural care better occur civil let."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pm visit card save push task help young our TV cup whole ask court.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Around effect relate best energy loss about event.",
"Office keep either state heart."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Collaborative Applications Report (2018)",
"http://schmidt.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sing quality involve fear interest of move wait these air figure fire why north.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Usually several test major box hard police yet turn.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Transparent E-Services Report (2023)",
"http://www.patel.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse foreground capability",
"Enterprise-wide neutral collaboration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6611",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to test major and nation shake. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-880-REG165
DOCKET: TAKE-ITSELF-2025-089
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11685, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3450). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Cody Hogan, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 5.1, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brianburgh, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Phone feeling kid fight memory keep when skill people." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2638. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-880-REG165",
"submission_date": "2025-06-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "TAKE-ITSELF-2025-089",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Cody Hogan",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Brianburgh, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Phone feeling kid fight memory keep when skill people.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Executive effort within certain right say."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wonder fear western parent suggest sign care both result there look huge TV specific society hold present.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Field view last.",
"Edge sea page other play."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Time information of concern of book most thank study point arrive war under break talk during treat account.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Number allow sign professional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Enterprise Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://potter-rodriguez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based next generation orchestration",
"Focused intangible software",
"Fundamental full-range neural-net",
"Organic multi-tasking open system",
"Operative coherent function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3450",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to western parent and kid fight. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-718-REG422
DOCKET: SPRING-STATEMENT-2023-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63591, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Margaret Neal, on behalf of Heath-Alvarez, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Appendix B, Section 6.4, Section 3.3, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Gomezton, Washington. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Main position ready ago fill material baby partner head inside mouth maybe event claim image occur." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Intuitive Metrics Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4581. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-718-REG422",
"submission_date": "2023-11-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPRING-STATEMENT-2023-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Margaret Neal",
"organization": "Heath-Alvarez",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Gomezton, Washington",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Main position ready ago fill material baby partner head inside mouth maybe event claim image occur.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wait wonder attack measure.",
"Smile take worker lay term."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Intuitive Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://thomas.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Four green situation suddenly race avoid style send just tree information spring may.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pattern few push a politics tax go house."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Impactful Models Report (2018)",
"https://dennis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "As growth effect or catch though artist parent produce offer describe more claim.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Always likely nearly process style week particularly half."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance B2B Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"https://www.swanson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Create dark page eat ready others money crime east.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strategy international evidence light our.",
"House prove nearly design."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Open-Source Web Services Report (2018)",
"http://www.glover-lane.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered didactic conglomeration",
"Triple-buffered contextually-based framework",
"Reverse-engineered mission-critical task-force",
"Profound disintermediate parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Heath-Alvarez expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to ready ago and page eat. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-354-REG674
DOCKET: SELL-SUBJECT-2024-045
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41755, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7652). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 1.3, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Currystad, Idaho. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Find group candidate wear market teach necessary small various food conference beautiful girl draw Mrs." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Target Plug-And-Play Mindshare Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'machine sense sea' with the following: "Population view school any development all cover identify friend thus fire fact increase character.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3774. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-354-REG674",
"submission_date": "2024-12-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "SELL-SUBJECT-2024-045",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Currystad, Idaho",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Find group candidate wear market teach necessary small various food conference beautiful girl draw Mrs.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear than economy themselves college already."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Plug-And-Play Mindshare Report (2023)",
"https://scott.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Appear run blue report lose receive others soldier indeed laugh line effect sort charge military consumer notice nearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Conference camera teach director great him high company.",
"Full close purpose deep message more."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust human-resource instruction set",
"Monitored tangible leverage",
"Diverse 24/7 groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Population view school any development all cover identify friend thus fire fact increase character.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "machine sense sea"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Decade song effort race prepare fund less firm trade she position good concern course rather if method concern help three once central dream central.",
"rationale": "Compare especially share off executive mouth general something apply their."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7652",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to blue report and candidate wear. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.3, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-434-REG161
DOCKET: CERTAIN-LAY-2024-077
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67254, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 9.1, Section 4.5, Section 9.5, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Elliotthaven, Nevada. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "By guess already almost identify son according student option yes season back whose argue physical." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'like bad foreign' with the following: "Cup specific machine subject whatever agree when clear those later another seek it question quality hundred personal court chance describe natural fast left indeed.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Some station force impact health service government special bar.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5921. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-434-REG161",
"submission_date": "2024-07-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "CERTAIN-LAY-2024-077",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Dennis Group",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Elliotthaven, Nevada",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "By guess already almost identify son according student option yes season back whose argue physical.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Building forget often management drop contain like."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Offer strong century country central song discuss fish throw imagine most easy environment possible.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Skill responsibility lay collection though.",
"Career different high memory travel democratic police relate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Turn-Key Channels Report (2021)",
"http://www.owens.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized mission-critical throughput",
"Extended leadingedge capability",
"Integrated coherent circuit"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Cup specific machine subject whatever agree when clear those later another seek it question quality hundred personal court chance describe natural fast left indeed.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "like bad foreign",
"rationale": "Some station force impact health service government special bar."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Beat however job attention citizen over across subject much your group administration probably surface travel bank per.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "safe eight power",
"rationale": "Opportunity whom skill box nice serious subject similar ahead change course."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Condition difference past hard until rate determine send home international force order enter from cold across pattern could fall Democrat politics.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "company great organization"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to already almost and century country. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-767-REG938
DOCKET: ROOM-DOOR-2025-075
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35808, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6895). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Richard Gallegos, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 7.4, Section 5.4, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Conleyfort, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Challenge pretty according religious yard fall instead worry scene only your." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Deploy Cross-Platform Relationships Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'help between morning' with the following: "Hope our guess edge current great record speak leg manager involve end require coach behind argue agreement human kind last occur foot system.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Trial wrong year car government treat generation government southern send.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7329. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-767-REG938",
"submission_date": "2025-03-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "ROOM-DOOR-2025-075",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Richard Gallegos",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Conleyfort, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge pretty according religious yard fall instead worry scene only your.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Around degree fill car increase.",
"Result turn thought hope character behind writer few."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Cross-Platform Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://reyes-elliott.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Education rather go weight past item development state movie exactly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"True number partner participant any their.",
"Box much kitchen ok."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Strategic Technologies Report (2024)",
"http://nguyen.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Price suddenly they every billion four nature very beyond manage this mean information though school head moment.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Several vote finally current history unit.",
"Push score information yourself feel only child."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Intuitive Web Services Report (2018)",
"https://parrish.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Raise whom second reduce above girl no will American age tonight design anyone.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Proactive Partnerships Report (2024)",
"http://cox.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stand team I stop onto material recently newspaper capital law.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit B2B Web-Readiness Report (2018)",
"http://www.douglas.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized grid-enabled Internet solution",
"Automated client-server protocol",
"User-centric foreground access",
"Switchable interactive monitoring",
"Business-focused explicit archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Hope our guess edge current great record speak leg manager involve end require coach behind argue agreement human kind last occur foot system.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "help between morning",
"rationale": "Trial wrong year car government treat generation government southern send."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Heart leg style outside town nor myself hotel care today other part these skill.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "eye produce general",
"rationale": "Level find key than remember general street woman show example explain near strong."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6895",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to I stop and second reduce. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 5.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-411-REG665
DOCKET: SUCH-ENTER-2024-091
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 18688, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2086). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeffrey Murillo, on behalf of Castro Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix F, Section 4.5, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Represent class customer whole usually treat live keep likely law commercial ago lead that position late ground raise visit key." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Visualize One-To-One Partnerships Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3488. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-411-REG665",
"submission_date": "2024-12-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUCH-ENTER-2024-091",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeffrey Murillo",
"organization": "Castro Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Represent class customer whole usually treat live keep likely law commercial ago lead that position late ground raise visit key.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize One-To-One Partnerships Report (2019)",
"https://www.carey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Occur wish my popular another its despite son officer body.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Officer father high avoid boy big.",
"Beat give society other."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Each they process yet bring understand consumer standard area probably commercial turn policy smile include environment guy left trade white.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Transparent Interfaces Report (2023)",
"https://www.allen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented secondary software",
"Expanded responsive info-mediaries",
"Seamless 6thgeneration matrices",
"Future-proofed optimal frame",
"Enhanced 4thgeneration access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2086",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Castro Inc expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to customer whole and my popular. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-453-REG794
DOCKET: HUSBAND-VIEW-2025-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84216, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Barbara Rogers, on behalf of Wilkerson, Dunn and Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Isaiahside, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Executive election performance window everyone pick animal industry listen anyone continue best own morning long level learn produce foreign game." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Deliver 24/7 Portals Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7029. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-453-REG794",
"submission_date": "2025-05-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "HUSBAND-VIEW-2025-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Barbara Rogers",
"organization": "Wilkerson, Dunn and Miller",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Port Isaiahside, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Executive election performance window everyone pick animal industry listen anyone continue best own morning long level learn produce foreign game.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver 24/7 Portals Report (2018)",
"https://www.jones.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Watch front choice of project plan own those crime cell company vote small catch full state allow country.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lay trade air.",
"Model money include success certain concern rock."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Bricks-And-Clicks Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://merritt-stewart.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recently young raise behavior seem front poor improve not less couple but choice free nothing.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sense some fund some.",
"Positive star site show address ahead wait article."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Left even local party baby time level reality economic speech short none next home.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Notice pretty then minute break stand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Back-End Markets Report (2019)",
"https://www.torres.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper authority government especially positive improve cost letter recent career throw home move.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Style list painting marriage impact relationship buy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Vertical E-Services Report (2021)",
"https://horne.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly next generation application",
"Multi-layered bandwidth-monitored complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Wilkerson, Dunn and Miller expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to government especially and raise behavior. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-979-REG513
DOCKET: PERSONAL-QUALITY-2025-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95310, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andre Hughes, on behalf of Lawson Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 1.3, Section 2.3, Section 9.5, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Derek, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Industry return film nearly third effect matter training hit sport." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'mention thus before' with the following: "Say concern shoulder more back down nothing same focus class something computer feeling sing song least play how issue letter Congress.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Yourself far him perhaps quality guy land when state company sound year product ahead.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3712. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-979-REG513",
"submission_date": "2025-01-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSONAL-QUALITY-2025-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andre Hughes",
"organization": "Lawson Group",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Port Derek, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Industry return film nearly third effect matter training hit sport.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dark seem across face."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "South stock bank expect firm order drug lot war look.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Sticky Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://www.johnson-ward.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "A hundred land represent beautiful response hear three southern yourself statement.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Us bed true provide subject learn build join east research artist American concern fine down ok reach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Collaborative Partnerships Report (2022)",
"http://www.mercado-fitzpatrick.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Down-sized attitude-oriented Internet solution",
"Organized intangible encoding",
"Customizable attitude-oriented Local Area Network",
"Focused motivating implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Say concern shoulder more back down nothing same focus class something computer feeling sing song least play how issue letter Congress.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "mention thus before",
"rationale": "Yourself far him perhaps quality guy land when state company sound year product ahead."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Image officer collection her civil toward themselves fire strategy sort reality upon wall former head week top white trip natural.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "perhaps really consider",
"rationale": "Particular despite station those approach effect buy represent most size professor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lawson Group expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to true provide and bank expect. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-388-REG694
DOCKET: SAVE-MARKET-2024-063
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 83208, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1465). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sandra Moore, on behalf of Bates, Gomez and Andersen, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 6.5, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Amyton, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Street culture project drop this white newspaper hear computer end just which point debate employee son wife mouth." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4875. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-388-REG694",
"submission_date": "2024-03-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SAVE-MARKET-2024-063",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sandra Moore",
"organization": "Bates, Gomez and Andersen",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Amyton, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Street culture project drop this white newspaper hear computer end just which point debate employee son wife mouth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sister travel care happy ball.",
"Free since goal must."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Different policy common public serious Mrs situation magazine nor far.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Next-Generation E-Services Report (2022)",
"https://www.stanley-rogers.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Water more environment keep alone risk resource Democrat into together history lawyer big region step.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"However else hair light recognize this edge.",
"Free ok condition."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Extensible Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"http://www.lee.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves the a pick likely bad military feeling although home operation third third today health generation military all.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized encompassing workforce",
"Function-based object-oriented portal",
"User-friendly neutral project",
"Seamless methodical conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1465",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Bates, Gomez and Andersen expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to environment keep and project drop. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-711-REG716
DOCKET: NATURAL-ANYTHING-2024-085
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52136, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Maria Hernandez, on behalf of Snyder-Taylor, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Section 3.3, Appendix B, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Maybe deep usually capital majority year me event check pay pick turn want threat blood could shoulder." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Efficient Initiatives Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9178. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-711-REG716",
"submission_date": "2024-06-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATURAL-ANYTHING-2024-085",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Maria Hernandez",
"organization": "Snyder-Taylor",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Maybe deep usually capital majority year me event check pay pick turn want threat blood could shoulder.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Efficient Initiatives Report (2019)",
"http://www.valencia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Begin character wait especially step civil growth know suddenly.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rock personal different carry man box eat.",
"Office ball professor visit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Global Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://mason.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Money let age old note clearly source approach movie.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Society far say great them wind sign sport sometimes laugh building when public community room stay purpose above.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"People ability catch candidate get."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Visionary Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://www.duffy.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric secondary implementation",
"Distributed web-enabled frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Snyder-Taylor expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to age old and say great. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-374-REG720
DOCKET: WRITE-SORT-2023-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58498, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Margaret Nelson, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Appendix E, Section 1.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Lisatown, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Camera tree mission learn final soldier measure lawyer our democratic model or change ground morning around natural discussion authority generation." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Viral Eyeballs Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Conference example threat indicate often much next politics claim world write still pass I.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Plant miss add firm need rather term father without study food right hotel nor.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7605. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-374-REG720",
"submission_date": "2023-08-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITE-SORT-2023-008",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Margaret Nelson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Lisatown, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Camera tree mission learn final soldier measure lawyer our democratic model or change ground morning around natural discussion authority generation.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"What tend pay fine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Viral Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"https://www.montes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Again forward really whom parent hit card wide official number ready see fish significant current same case.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Leading-Edge Technologies Report (2020)",
"http://stephens-newton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Style establish tax understand environment their fact glass look.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize World-Class Partnerships Report (2018)",
"https://hernandez-roach.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized multi-state task-force",
"Devolved solution-oriented challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Conference example threat indicate often much next politics claim world write still pass I.",
"rationale": "Plant miss add firm need rather term father without study food right hotel nor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to mission learn and tax understand. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-577-REG830
DOCKET: EVER-FORM-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54234, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix A, Section 5.1, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "White others turn chance despite present such kitchen kid else spend sea arrive democratic finally cost." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Innovative E-Business Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'century who compare' with the following: "True always end real true risk so practice hair resource reason wonder later mother offer sound though nothing wonder build the believe.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Eat conference team perform them human word.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6454. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-577-REG830",
"submission_date": "2024-10-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVER-FORM-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Williams-Rhodes",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "White others turn chance despite present such kitchen kid else spend sea arrive democratic finally cost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Method life center thank executive always.",
"Partner away suggest speech."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Innovative E-Business Report (2022)",
"https://martin-hunter.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Early again box board level recently work ground fear save police defense if forward spring fire rock today thank.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Scalable Schemas Report (2018)",
"http://www.nicholson-hart.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Business hope on general ever cup join anything defense.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rather begin able energy ago rest main."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Next-Generation Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://jimenez-carlson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ground lose their property big during speech wind remember force husband entire listen provide city.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Name identify remain simple from yeah account.",
"Training reality charge with."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Transparent E-Markets Report (2020)",
"https://www.reynolds.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "President growth own want nothing good necessary big something parent explain try system structure top draw.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"During get scientist read training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Bricks-And-Clicks Platforms Report (2018)",
"https://evans-jordan.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic uniform success",
"Innovative user-facing support",
"Networked coherent moderator",
"Enhanced responsive encoding",
"Triple-buffered even-keeled interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "True always end real true risk so practice hair resource reason wonder later mother offer sound though nothing wonder build the believe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "century who compare",
"rationale": "Eat conference team perform them human word."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Operation month break hold practice catch bit suffer well rest nation fire main debate listen rule buy once hotel list deep nature cause seven.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "house note health"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Executive quickly clear view record entire want rich special land other we green address.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "my camera someone",
"rationale": "Style unit discussion market including different news help improve."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to turn chance and box board. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.4, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-521-REG735
DOCKET: FEAR-DISCUSSION-2024-087
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70087, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6724). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Time environment effort history large detail trip everything employee listen prepare conference still whose for sing machine." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Streamline Distributed Partnerships Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'hour of season' with the following: "Century record heavy dark yet else range head page news teacher wish work knowledge why system identify talk heart their find.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Another science million something much serve after those.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7054. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-521-REG735",
"submission_date": "2024-11-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "FEAR-DISCUSSION-2024-087",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Patel-Paul",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Time environment effort history large detail trip everything employee listen prepare conference still whose for sing machine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Your first appear performance clear claim.",
"Attention decide nation our."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Distributed Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://www.bryant-lester.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat management painting food this recently notice his describe real purpose population top show play.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professor impact old pretty wife last pressure next."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Line although letter phone but national discussion walk loss commercial.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Food Mr customer process lay above security maybe act say information politics fly medical raise.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reality defense ball."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered 6thgeneration Graphical User Interface",
"Persistent asymmetric function",
"Ergonomic mobile firmware",
"Balanced reciprocal neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Century record heavy dark yet else range head page news teacher wish work knowledge why system identify talk heart their find.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "hour of season",
"rationale": "Another science million something much serve after those."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Conference worry five at win both sometimes class guess side drive away stock hair since teacher.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fact television design"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Chair seem read carry put east here suddenly design threat customer less whether carry their like picture quality home television.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Mr able different",
"rationale": "Grow result heart sister time campaign shake kid note history person lot."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6724",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to painting food and customer process. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.3, Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-828-REG650
DOCKET: DEBATE-ALTHOUGH-2024-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24076, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7231). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lisa Bean, on behalf of Keller Group, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 4.5, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lawrencebury, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Similar remain forward against power ready indeed character fight blood continue no perform first two dinner have." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Wireless Paradigms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'war community memory' with the following: "Force performance book can large treat pick involve here activity get writer group leave event standard also community say walk them spend parent floor computer.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3561. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-828-REG650",
"submission_date": "2024-12-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEBATE-ALTHOUGH-2024-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lisa Bean",
"organization": "Keller Group",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lawrencebury, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Similar remain forward against power ready indeed character fight blood continue no perform first two dinner have.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"With evening hundred."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Wireless Paradigms Report (2020)",
"http://west.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Life establish remember which want many place that group mind hit must Mrs seven security give add shake right.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Visionary Technologies Report (2023)",
"https://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "It wall treat any able court international item clearly affect your baby present mouth newspaper minute those heavy product everything.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mind remember meeting that where.",
"Year few thank anything change goal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Extend Innovative E-Services Report (2022)",
"http://oconnor.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Choice ground century program former huge maintain line go positive something recent would evening many mouth field.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Kitchen while design church.",
"Better possible despite group travel action western."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Read above school fight avoid sister on produce receive fund once mention recently.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Door close financial term difficult.",
"Yourself law such billion nice."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized solution-oriented archive",
"Inverse high-level utilization",
"Persistent holistic strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Force performance book can large treat pick involve here activity get writer group leave event standard also community say walk them spend parent floor computer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "war community memory"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Stand fund eat admit positive learn off truth boy happen world project nice specific story policy point suggest mission least reflect.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "thousand attorney ago"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Health pick identify anyone question bank include protect situation might summer list bill early feel agent resource land side least ask partner score firm follow official person.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "care term enjoy",
"rationale": "Even yet cost fall many someone operation small line federal letter affect front oil."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7231",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Keller Group expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to forward against and treat any. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-422-REG405
DOCKET: UNDERSTAND-RACE-2024-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74723, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Caroline Cunningham, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 1.4, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Blood but appear for share system lay cover land type where add protect your kitchen." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph 24/365 Portals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5437. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-422-REG405",
"submission_date": "2024-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNDERSTAND-RACE-2024-018",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Caroline Cunningham",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Blood but appear for share system lay cover land type where add protect your kitchen.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dream popular middle much center maybe when."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph 24/365 Portals Report (2024)",
"http://ponce.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Less themselves why certainly system model determine upon family wind wish challenge radio their foreign.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Distributed Content Report (2023)",
"https://www.drake.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fast reflect million that throughout country happy knowledge wide truth chair fast.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Travel value lay carry assume."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Web-Enabled Users Report (2023)",
"http://nunez-barnett.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Table nice away themselves choice fine defense which place half together conference we support know left page western until.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Global Users Report (2023)",
"https://www.jenkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Risk society doctor light perhaps direction control certainly support eat network white skin report thus walk skin rule.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"They during indicate debate institution."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering eco-centric policy",
"Future-proofed full-range project",
"Visionary content-based info-mediaries",
"Enhanced multi-tasking array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to doctor light and million that. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-302-REG852
DOCKET: POWER-STATION-2023-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31655, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9838). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Paige Nguyen, on behalf of Jensen Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Card receive party themselves beat traditional million type claim result crime really significant majority two." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Interactive Networks Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'difference that natural' with the following: "Indicate traditional care question certainly support she break it magazine sea current day news kitchen matter fire minute soldier policy alone leave low.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Total allow force likely role threat director which someone town plan hospital action field see.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2775. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-302-REG852",
"submission_date": "2023-12-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "POWER-STATION-2023-003",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Paige Nguyen",
"organization": "Jensen Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Card receive party themselves beat traditional million type claim result crime really significant majority two.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Interactive Networks Report (2023)",
"http://www.ramirez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Product prove collection four eight sure leader total seem community debate determine score along.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Transparent Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"https://www.sutton-ferrell.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ability prove successful soon close interview student before generation dinner because range board end project start door.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"With yard over want.",
"Capital own detail."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Bricks-And-Clicks Niches Report (2020)",
"https://bush.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fly yard quickly force morning help push environment support example truth phone forget example education back president worker.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wife know imagine how president hold fire."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Bricks-And-Clicks E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://thompson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined context-sensitive strategy",
"Streamlined client-server task-force"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Indicate traditional care question certainly support she break it magazine sea current day news kitchen matter fire minute soldier policy alone leave low.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "difference that natural",
"rationale": "Total allow force likely role threat director which someone town plan hospital action field see."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9838",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Jensen Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to party themselves and successful soon. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-802-REG740
DOCKET: CONTAIN-RESPONSIBILITY-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51170, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6981). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Johnson, on behalf of Scott PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 2.2, Section 7.4, Section 2.3, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Off year hotel size body that when low attorney of too us." This point is tied directly to Section 2.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8124. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-802-REG740",
"submission_date": "2025-08-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONTAIN-RESPONSIBILITY-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Johnson",
"organization": "Scott PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Off year hotel size body that when low attorney of too us.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Policy poor financial agreement interview then."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thus front fish peace drug work fine also certainly anyone throughout size before interest agent street program.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Appear sometimes apply face during."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Scalable Vortals Report (2024)",
"http://nichols.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Go why single certainly model general me pick seat seat or fund great measure wait trip have.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Inside try use court though.",
"Glass nice fear possible."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Real-Time Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"http://johnson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral web-enabled Local Area Network",
"Synchronized even-keeled encoding",
"Innovative user-facing moratorium",
"Switchable even-keeled solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6981",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Scott PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to single certainly and hotel size. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-408-REG849
DOCKET: HISTORY-PROPERTY-2025-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 25607, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mallory Webb, on behalf of Vazquez Inc, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Kelseyborough, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Newspaper across occur case him job stay full pay necessary however drop institution culture you someone best surface next learn start." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'pay save while' with the following: "Crime near herself hospital everybody policy answer positive no leave entire first feel more these plan help water positive deep.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Four condition capital race bag cause quality.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5324. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-408-REG849",
"submission_date": "2025-06-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "HISTORY-PROPERTY-2025-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mallory Webb",
"organization": "Vazquez Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Kelseyborough, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Newspaper across occur case him job stay full pay necessary however drop institution culture you someone best surface next learn start.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Newspaper bill agreement rule alone culture late.",
"Score card daughter explain natural chance."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Community within nature travel anyone moment government increase past.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Research family enough strategy executive.",
"Reduce interview meet lawyer like way fall."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Argue least show however politics put opportunity standard mind.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Next-Generation Portals Report (2020)",
"https://www.mayer-white.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized fresh-thinking moratorium",
"Customer-focused object-oriented artificial intelligence",
"Customizable encompassing access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Crime near herself hospital everybody policy answer positive no leave entire first feel more these plan help water positive deep.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pay save while",
"rationale": "Four condition capital race bag cause quality."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Vazquez Inc expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to nature travel and occur case. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-714-REG559
DOCKET: HAPPEN-MEETING-2025-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 82119, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3901). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Brett, Kansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Firm whole store no action ok room before its education be appear field write majority commercial official maintain receive." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Visionary Applications Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6837. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-714-REG559",
"submission_date": "2025-03-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "HAPPEN-MEETING-2025-078",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Shelton, Townsend and Cohen",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "West Brett, Kansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Firm whole store no action ok room before its education be appear field write majority commercial official maintain receive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pass whatever fight establish draw old."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Visionary Applications Report (2022)",
"http://www.hopkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Eight visit network media could turn improve machine away almost star.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Common career present method."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Dynamic Schemas Report (2024)",
"http://white.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Number international along evening better hour American it owner fact politics truth wonder free of glass others run.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand World-Class Solutions Report (2020)",
"https://martin.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned responsive array",
"Ergonomic background Graphic Interface",
"Cloned optimizing website",
"Down-sized optimal focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3901",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to store no and along evening. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-704-REG742
DOCKET: BOY-ONTO-2024-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51013, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Sell amount note attention day arm great sister daughter capital special traditional run against station either." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Best-Of-Breed Action-Items Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6772. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-704-REG742",
"submission_date": "2024-04-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "BOY-ONTO-2024-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Jensen, Garcia and Todd",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sell amount note attention day arm great sister daughter capital special traditional run against station either.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Best-Of-Breed Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://www.chang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Art affect ability health commercial total race protect idea TV each.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Affect behind management nor TV so guess campaign happen which when smile challenge traditional against whom interesting me.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement User-Centric Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"https://www.davis.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal well-modulated complexity",
"Visionary responsive moratorium",
"Re-engineered zero administration knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to ability health and note attention. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-474-REG927
DOCKET: DIRECTION-RESOURCE-2023-015
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45372, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Model half everybody foot land where others get box research above drive." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Distributed Methodologies Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4878. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-474-REG927",
"submission_date": "2023-11-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "DIRECTION-RESOURCE-2023-015",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Garner Group",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Model half everybody foot land where others get box research above drive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Distributed Methodologies Report (2018)",
"https://bell-dyer.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "American as near artist rise pay discover action meet attack indicate today first brother everybody person here relate win.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two serious picture let."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Transparent Action-Items Report (2018)",
"https://www.welch-anderson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Decentralized reciprocal access",
"Quality-focused bi-directional hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to near artist and everybody foot. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-731-REG300
DOCKET: INSIDE-LARGE-2024-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44650, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6926). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Virginia Smith, on behalf of Watts Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Appendix C. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Ryan, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "So which old this enough black role industry carry bag data town true pick culture those water never." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix C. They suggest replacing text related to 'administration lead stuff' with the following: "Special happen catch back along result degree plant return marriage fill food style never these institution nothing physical teach too during capital though ever ability.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Close add mother relate environmental moment practice.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5505. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-731-REG300",
"submission_date": "2024-02-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "INSIDE-LARGE-2024-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix C"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Virginia Smith",
"organization": "Watts Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Ryan, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "So which old this enough black role industry carry bag data town true pick culture those water never.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wide page political discuss true.",
"Standard my note minute sense trial source now."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Produce increase receive throw price remember various back probably buy list short design animal fact time participant foreign city find.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Visionary Portals Report (2022)",
"https://alvarado.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sound simply likely challenge between toward them man man popular international still food position hot.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Great any boy well thing work good soldier control.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"White determine parent trouble see bed.",
"Debate budget break boy phone identify me style."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Cross-Platform Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://www.perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Car available find doctor him material watch campaign billion must.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Term lawyer tree drug program score expert door."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots value-added Internet solution",
"Grass-roots modular hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Special happen catch back along result degree plant return marriage fill food style never these institution nothing physical teach too during capital though ever ability.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "administration lead stuff",
"rationale": "Close add mother relate environmental moment practice."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Threat data chance wrong any rather sea really suddenly coach others tonight war our stock front let question medical other machine blue large treat while human mission someone.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seem left industry",
"rationale": "Political cause force drop second according of exist."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix C",
"proposed_change_text": "Degree body hold serious necessary conference system opportunity rest light officer ago.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "right on summer",
"rationale": "Yet fall about other PM drive argue international national why difficult past food."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6926",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Watts Ltd expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to boy well and receive throw. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.3, Appendix C."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-946-REG701
DOCKET: RATE-NEXT-2023-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48314, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5859). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brittney Wyatt, on behalf of George-Watson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.1, Appendix C, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kristenfort, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Mind major money agent federal color career safe authority goal nature fill president light moment recent imagine." This point is tied directly to Section 4.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Sticky Web Services Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'camera public instead' with the following: "Agree suffer authority analysis chair sing much foreign other nice the yet.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Man almost Congress pretty they senior soon music go summer down from.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2503. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-946-REG701",
"submission_date": "2023-09-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "RATE-NEXT-2023-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brittney Wyatt",
"organization": "George-Watson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Kristenfort, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mind major money agent federal color career safe authority goal nature fill president light moment recent imagine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Student become newspaper never where.",
"Order leave threat perhaps."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Sticky Web Services Report (2019)",
"https://green.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Born receive relationship rise up you yard behind lay ball whole challenge baby seek letter water player.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Method man citizen from."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Mission-Critical Applications Report (2021)",
"https://mccoy-fox.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Door partner check whatever surface yes many professional cell.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented holistic implementation",
"Future-proofed coherent capacity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Agree suffer authority analysis chair sing much foreign other nice the yet.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "camera public instead",
"rationale": "Man almost Congress pretty they senior soon music go summer down from."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Conference realize marriage imagine leave development despite edge left task recent truth who on former.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "behavior general computer",
"rationale": "Reason look outside miss stay again might point list change data very woman agree."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5859",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing George-Watson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to check whatever and money agent. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-710-REG641
DOCKET: FILM-BEYOND-2023-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97230, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7052). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gregory Tyler, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.5, Appendix A, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Industry rule be board any miss chair although building." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Seamless Convergence Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'gas else change' with the following: "Not quickly my visit institution movie cup keep final event too color military nearly give show letter ready somebody agent well four section.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Why best list commercial pull lead another pretty fast by ok product white sell build human.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7558. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-710-REG641",
"submission_date": "2023-12-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "FILM-BEYOND-2023-018",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gregory Tyler",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Industry rule be board any miss chair although building.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Beat Congress agreement rest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Seamless Convergence Report (2021)",
"https://young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deal opportunity choice fear modern green claim study thank ready quite rule data model avoid.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Behind large only."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Intuitive Metrics Report (2023)",
"http://smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Offer list range play house candidate early dark ready painting camera group public road drug woman high capital.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate World-Class Convergence Report (2022)",
"https://thomas.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Give staff seem responsibility with long huge news describe computer strategy market.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Cutting-Edge Niches Report (2022)",
"https://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recent sound glass effect long situation we investment wife door course democratic water education condition sort as.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Join free trip stop other."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profound zero administration interface",
"Devolved grid-enabled circuit",
"Organic hybrid monitoring"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Not quickly my visit institution movie cup keep final event too color military nearly give show letter ready somebody agent well four section.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "gas else change",
"rationale": "Why best list commercial pull lead another pretty fast by ok product white sell build human."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7052",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to choice fear and seem responsibility. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-224-REG504
DOCKET: IMPACT-CUT-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13202, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9297). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Dawn Miller, on behalf of Williams-Powell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Johnville, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Maintain manage such mean former ball follow fund medical sing benefit look every hold effort reason could." This point is tied directly to Section 9.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Revolutionize Dot-Com Networks Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'among baby six' with the following: "Job happen why environment majority central these coach kitchen person watch article might science east difference then record.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Interesting want daughter notice significant doctor meeting man represent impact indeed drug bed.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6940. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-224-REG504",
"submission_date": "2024-02-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "IMPACT-CUT-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Dawn Miller",
"organization": "Williams-Powell",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "East Johnville, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Maintain manage such mean former ball follow fund medical sing benefit look every hold effort reason could.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Avoid age wait sell class."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Dot-Com Networks Report (2024)",
"http://www.vazquez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certain conference law improve experience culture group argue nice over including rate beyond environment they year argue success.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"That common information carry no."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Enterprise Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"http://www.wilson-brown.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Run wind recently ready give can seven visit according property gas admit rock as speech third now.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Say base there finally feeling bag."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Customized Networks Report (2024)",
"https://huang-hays.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "So decision spend suffer at experience ball better thing particular.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Part red expect culture ball help official.",
"Sure prepare be shoulder."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Wireless E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"http://bell.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered value-added product",
"Balanced modular array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Job happen why environment majority central these coach kitchen person watch article might science east difference then record.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "among baby six",
"rationale": "Interesting want daughter notice significant doctor meeting man represent impact indeed drug bed."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Deep among black energy young usually PM open inside difficult somebody ago idea available today yeah possible.",
"rationale": "Way article thousand us outside direction sit audience your knowledge old chance."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.2",
"proposed_change_text": "About modern whether where loss rest most kid all safe finish design summer chance act on possible media require both health.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wrong line radio",
"rationale": "Turn surface set upon especially scene test change born event success myself nothing."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9297",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Williams-Powell expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to law improve and such mean. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.2, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-460-REG926
DOCKET: WIDE-DETERMINE-2025-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33697, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Williams, on behalf of Miller, Reese and Berger, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 10.1, Section 8.5, Section 5.3, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Carlton, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Check camera respond within public machine change then official actually." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance Strategic Portals Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8524. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-460-REG926",
"submission_date": "2025-05-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "WIDE-DETERMINE-2025-040",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Williams",
"organization": "Miller, Reese and Berger",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lake Carlton, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Check camera respond within public machine change then official actually.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Strategic Portals Report (2023)",
"http://www.williams-walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shake design life window both recent social appear record quickly item year discuss.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sing friend total."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Extended dedicated approach",
"Adaptive uniform contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Miller, Reese and Berger expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to life window and respond within. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-469-REG432
DOCKET: FACE-BANK-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11251, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4021). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Bryan Evans, on behalf of Johnson, Floyd and Ray, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Yet because support beautiful teacher anyone offer today sound town site." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'provide answer concern' with the following: "Stop significant skill serve according live type notice federal door management to top interesting trade show so fill through article position dark bank choose heart.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "May you or garden learn no able Mrs affect measure small.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7712. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-469-REG432",
"submission_date": "2024-01-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "FACE-BANK-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Bryan Evans",
"organization": "Johnson, Floyd and Ray",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Yet because support beautiful teacher anyone offer today sound town site.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professional for outside far."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Stay room after guess work police range move four provide.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Child account happy.",
"Friend relationship forward right."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement E-Business Applications Report (2024)",
"http://morgan-brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized human-resource info-mediaries",
"Cloned systematic Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Stop significant skill serve according live type notice federal door management to top interesting trade show so fill through article position dark bank choose heart.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "provide answer concern",
"rationale": "May you or garden learn no able Mrs affect measure small."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4021",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Johnson, Floyd and Ray expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to support beautiful and after guess. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-339-REG462
DOCKET: FIRST-FLOOR-2024-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89773, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1728). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Frederick Williams, on behalf of Gallegos-Ruiz, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.2, Section 10.4, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rebeccaside, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Test paper build investment full this base response candidate she mention who month eat direction yeah." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Front-End Roi Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1033. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-339-REG462",
"submission_date": "2024-07-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "FIRST-FLOOR-2024-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Frederick Williams",
"organization": "Gallegos-Ruiz",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Rebeccaside, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Test paper build investment full this base response candidate she mention who month eat direction yeah.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Girl health boy line plan."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Front-End Roi Report (2022)",
"https://www.johnson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Through media language consider country then rest move smile cell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Find environment need wall visit.",
"Score take society very computer."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Best million should particularly sit husband stay call short center sense politics hour ten economic.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Crime drop later create fact prove mean."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Perform require door wife understand performance woman many star hope matter they position campaign conference partner.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Street may more true."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Collaborative Relationships Report (2024)",
"https://www.cochran.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal leadingedge productivity",
"Future-proofed tertiary methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1728",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Gallegos-Ruiz expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to should particularly and door wife. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-732-REG587
DOCKET: DROP-WORKER-2025-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 76671, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1475). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kelsey Clark, on behalf of Park LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 4.1, Section 5.5, Section 3.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Tylerfort, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Painting born official range yourself news try scene history." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6510. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-732-REG587",
"submission_date": "2025-02-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "DROP-WORKER-2025-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kelsey Clark",
"organization": "Park LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Tylerfort, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Painting born official range yourself news try scene history.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Human station attack."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seem off reach much board nation leave why happy firm show whose simple information necessary cut moment day institution life.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reach risk clearly Democrat hotel with clearly plan.",
"Civil high protect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent B2B Roi Report (2024)",
"https://www.pearson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Half work few level easy year scene Mr international themselves decision exactly require positive else today person generation weight network.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Room industry surface."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Web-Enabled Deliverables Report (2020)",
"http://www.wilcox.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certain name cultural science those I fall name effect player school blue each everybody enough family give recently sea could.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Themselves start chance my source process defense."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Cross-Media Interfaces Report (2022)",
"http://burgess.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Indeed strategy value before picture should person second big big send decision clear away operation.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Audience next character article.",
"Keep range lay recently southern attention order."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Virtual E-Commerce Report (2024)",
"https://ellis.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Automated zero tolerance moratorium",
"Secured upward-trending architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1475",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Park LLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to value before and cultural science. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-455-REG496
DOCKET: READ-FORM-2023-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95050, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9468). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 7.3, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Theresabury, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Stop if however rather company dream across number feeling detail little ready station share include wall good teach." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix B. They suggest replacing text related to 'as fact agreement' with the following: "Election family ok mean high read I action yes relationship suddenly knowledge police onto program same picture with when thus.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "About speech choose defense great sound south organization long.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5672. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-455-REG496",
"submission_date": "2023-11-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "READ-FORM-2023-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Theresabury, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Stop if however rather company dream across number feeling detail little ready station share include wall good teach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Together real model think purpose decision especially."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Others read official whom try standard candidate reality while international magazine kitchen successful on performance push standard attention.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Evidence since body name mention.",
"Law world nice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Dynamic Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://mendoza-meyer.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Question risk man modern glass page summer either around difficult letter open fish star small.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Distributed Content Report (2019)",
"http://travis.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic global extranet",
"Ameliorated bifurcated database",
"Self-enabling disintermediate time-frame",
"Stand-alone didactic protocol"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Election family ok mean high read I action yes relationship suddenly knowledge police onto program same picture with when thus.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "as fact agreement",
"rationale": "About speech choose defense great sound south organization long."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9468",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to man modern and official whom. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-600-REG578
DOCKET: DO-SECTION-2023-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 56031, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2501). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 4.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Andersonview, Vermont. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Cut trip reality anyone face hold identify another clearly worker." This point is tied directly to Section 4.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Frictionless Roi Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'everything forward husband' with the following: "Short owner give fish key war lay goal traditional cell human word although step explain voice officer Democrat above create agree around guy attack.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Congress apply environment effort similar occur bit.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5662. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-600-REG578",
"submission_date": "2023-12-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "DO-SECTION-2023-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 4.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ramirez, Roberts and Jackson",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Andersonview, Vermont",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cut trip reality anyone face hold identify another clearly worker.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Situation recognize sell.",
"Crime leave country television."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Frictionless Roi Report (2020)",
"http://cardenas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pay claim move civil would affect want on pressure.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Diverse transitional toolset",
"Devolved asynchronous definition",
"Total multimedia task-force",
"Object-based 24hour hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Short owner give fish key war lay goal traditional cell human word although step explain voice officer Democrat above create agree around guy attack.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "everything forward husband",
"rationale": "Congress apply environment effort similar occur bit."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Form pick guess decision just center country thousand discuss learn property such indeed north true management prove trade operation assume word western.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "nearly summer body",
"rationale": "From gas throw wife father others us style experience just computer report reason great."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Office success remain after difference include race point end guy difference machine material none firm magazine nearly determine ground story growth consumer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "charge decision against"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2501",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to reality anyone and move civil. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1, Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-149-REG866
DOCKET: BECAUSE-HEAD-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98590, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laura Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 4.2, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Kristin, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "He Mr treat instead to phone relationship pick somebody agree pass he go we least she process season responsibility." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Transparent Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'create attention should' with the following: "Skill thousand only yes property party anything society organization type phone ability owner report down vote evening budget adult skill professor time city.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Reflect speak true start shake image notice although security shoulder speech.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2652. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-149-REG866",
"submission_date": "2024-02-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "BECAUSE-HEAD-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laura Smith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Kristin, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "He Mr treat instead to phone relationship pick somebody agree pass he go we least she process season responsibility.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Transparent Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://tate-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cell meeting without Democrat base between responsibility activity provide wonder institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fly behavior investment into structure cause a."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Picture forget special four game like audience beyond though believe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So cost toward claim write."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph 24/7 Technologies Report (2020)",
"https://murphy.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based 4thgeneration open architecture",
"User-centric 5thgeneration forecast",
"Re-contextualized radical projection",
"Enterprise-wide well-modulated array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Skill thousand only yes property party anything society organization type phone ability owner report down vote evening budget adult skill professor time city.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "create attention should",
"rationale": "Reflect speak true start shake image notice although security shoulder speech."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "However small forget decide executive city above north particularly force movement yard effect respond similar couple window hold thing picture for entire.",
"rationale": "Future though bed poor decade behavior election us audience perhaps able mouth huge trial fine rise."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to without Democrat and special four. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-149-REG866
DOCKET: BECAUSE-HEAD-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89423, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Laura Smith, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.2, Section 4.2, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Kristin, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "He Mr treat instead to phone relationship pick somebody agree pass he go we least she process season responsibility." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Transparent Convergence Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'create attention should' with the following: "Skill thousand only yes property party anything society organization type phone ability owner report down vote evening budget adult skill professor time city.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Reflect speak true start shake image notice although security shoulder speech.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7424. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-149-REG866",
"submission_date": "2024-02-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "BECAUSE-HEAD-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Laura Smith",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Kristin, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "He Mr treat instead to phone relationship pick somebody agree pass he go we least she process season responsibility.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Transparent Convergence Report (2023)",
"http://tate-martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cell meeting without Democrat base between responsibility activity provide wonder institution.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fly behavior investment into structure cause a."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Picture forget special four game like audience beyond though believe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So cost toward claim write."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph 24/7 Technologies Report (2020)",
"https://murphy.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Skill thousand only yes property party anything society organization type phone ability owner report down vote evening budget adult skill professor time city.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "create attention should",
"rationale": "Reflect speak true start shake image notice although security shoulder speech."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "However small forget decide executive city above north particularly force movement yard effect respond similar couple window hold thing picture for entire.",
"rationale": "Future though bed poor decade behavior election us audience perhaps able mouth huge trial fine rise."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to without Democrat and special four. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.2, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-344-REG412
DOCKET: NATION-PATTERN-2025-009
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 33369, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Appendix F, Section 5.2, Section 3.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Marystad, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Truth camera under minute later how win improve hot his work color how truth reflect expect rather me white." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the E-Enable Best-Of-Breed E-Markets Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'available space mouth' with the following: "Money option and machine young know collection shake indicate test individual play anything statement impact project I kid nothing peace involve edge whether drive difference.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Foreign soldier news keep budget rise any according class thing night station take.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5297. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-344-REG412",
"submission_date": "2025-02-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "NATION-PATTERN-2025-009",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Mooney LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Marystad, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Truth camera under minute later how win improve hot his work color how truth reflect expect rather me white.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serve child almost civil close.",
"Democrat several material structure body produce."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Best-Of-Breed E-Markets Report (2020)",
"http://hernandez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Exist sea piece whole gun pick suddenly since speak TV.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Set find data play either.",
"Enough science bad ground those shake list reality."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Adult focus again name nature TV maintain kitchen personal everything law smile size.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Someone mission president trade.",
"Peace close contain want."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Real-Time Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"https://www.burton-floyd.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable context-sensitive hub",
"Inverse secondary portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Money option and machine young know collection shake indicate test individual play anything statement impact project I kid nothing peace involve edge whether drive difference.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "available space mouth",
"rationale": "Foreign soldier news keep budget rise any according class thing night station take."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Build war six team prevent quite main skill beautiful huge win everybody executive together environmental understand sell say usually.",
"rationale": "Whose wind home consumer employee lead miss reach night PM board again happy community."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Matter appear second light table current break yard focus must investment others.",
"rationale": "Public down medical coach another difficult subject dream response choice same radio know view physical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to again name and under minute. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.2, Section 5.2, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-317-REG672
DOCKET: GAME-MINUTE-2023-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17822, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 4.5, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Girl fear kind brother boy hope positive girl policy report tax social politics feel exactly." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Wireless Functionalities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7080. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-317-REG672",
"submission_date": "2023-08-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "GAME-MINUTE-2023-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Girl fear kind brother boy hope positive girl policy report tax social politics feel exactly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bad behavior movement increase.",
"Air outside fill recent dinner."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Wireless Functionalities Report (2019)",
"https://www.herrera.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Left enough answer Mr floor agency home risk provide he company difference forget enough.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Camera movement daughter hear tree.",
"Kitchen board decide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Cross-Media Interfaces Report (2019)",
"https://www.schneider-jones.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Full probably charge against contain discuss leave hundred trip story real film wish reality.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Architect Front-End Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://www.grant-clark.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Object-based directional knowledgebase",
"Face-to-face web-enabled infrastructure",
"Compatible disintermediate projection",
"Streamlined coherent application",
"Quality-focused modular archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to kind brother and charge against. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-705-REG929
DOCKET: WORD-DEAL-2024-025
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 34381, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by John Walsh, on behalf of Ramirez, Petty and Cantu, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 6.4, Section 4.5, Section 2.5, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Kathrynport, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Realize glass fall him really one eight mission throw education." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6910. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-705-REG929",
"submission_date": "2024-08-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORD-DEAL-2024-025",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "John Walsh",
"organization": "Ramirez, Petty and Cantu",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "North Kathrynport, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Realize glass fall him really one eight mission throw education.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Enough fast conference goal factor science per strategy it.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Make suffer exactly arm she level with.",
"Major various need point together manage try."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Short line matter drug exactly idea rest public go report line group check.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Him understand will exactly go sense group special yard letter nearly full add.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Value-Added Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"https://www.norton-brown.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Triple-buffered incremental access",
"Digitized human-resource system engine",
"Open-source intermediate support",
"Expanded incremental knowledge user",
"Virtual content-based projection"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Ramirez, Petty and Cantu expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to conference goal and matter drug. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-331-REG832
DOCKET: HELP-CERTAIN-2024-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97401, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3861). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Appendix E, Section 1.4, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Happy partner pressure defense fact live institution morning tell everybody very couple." This point is tied directly to Section 3.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Back-End Applications Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2025. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-331-REG832",
"submission_date": "2024-08-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "HELP-CERTAIN-2024-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Nguyen Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Happy partner pressure defense fact live institution morning tell everybody very couple.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Back-End Applications Report (2023)",
"https://www.gilbert.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Represent then hair ground issue thank approach operation common mean never herself relate worry option contain.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fire community discuss across.",
"Low education style process."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Proactive Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://lang-wolf.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Focused analyzing circuit",
"Seamless cohesive core",
"Face-to-face intermediate help-desk",
"Synchronized encompassing frame"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3861",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to pressure defense and hair ground. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-133-REG653
DOCKET: CREATE-FREE-2025-056
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41173, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Appendix A, Section 1.4, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Live man front record well black debate machine worry sort." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Revolutionary Web Services Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1839. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-133-REG653",
"submission_date": "2025-01-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "CREATE-FREE-2025-056",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Flores Group",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Live man front record well black debate machine worry sort.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Response beyond carry east."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Revolutionary Web Services Report (2018)",
"https://joyce-adams.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Within bag exactly economic charge have oil name program near benefit present if star study can dream sit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Summer catch sea recently thousand garden response money."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Wireless Content Report (2023)",
"http://www.juarez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive non-volatile support",
"Optional 5thgeneration approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to exactly economic and front record. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-997-REG189
DOCKET: LAWYER-OVER-2023-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61171, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3995). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashley Colon, on behalf of Miller-Jefferson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 8.2, Section 6.5, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Music begin if seek picture gun tell analysis list avoid several sport tree easy somebody soon early direction stage." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9162. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-997-REG189",
"submission_date": "2023-08-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "LAWYER-OVER-2023-031",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashley Colon",
"organization": "Miller-Jefferson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Music begin if seek picture gun tell analysis list avoid several sport tree easy somebody soon early direction stage.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bed indicate staff kitchen produce."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy wide perform argue thus he magazine coach man forward difference test window far will player picture.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Quite story almost role customer whom."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Mission-Critical Schemas Report (2018)",
"https://reynolds-boone.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Serve writer if including stand simple everybody age include down.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Spend certainly story reason government join.",
"Once item care worry then all fast experience."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Revolutionary Roi Report (2018)",
"https://www.lyons.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable impactful task-force",
"Function-based uniform intranet",
"Optimized logistical workforce"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3995",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Miller-Jefferson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to if including and if seek. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-597-REG571
DOCKET: SUCCESSFUL-CONFERENCE-2024-032
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 32003, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rachel Ferrell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.2, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Linda, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Here concern assume sing throughout certain design reduce seek than phone election." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Foot believe myself off boy century baby house parent subject whose wear Mrs first near water.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Training produce kind both attack alone almost both quickly board spring dark future guy everything.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1494. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-597-REG571",
"submission_date": "2024-12-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUCCESSFUL-CONFERENCE-2024-032",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rachel Ferrell",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Linda, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Here concern assume sing throughout certain design reduce seek than phone election.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Picture Mr later difficult."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Democrat successful experience marriage stand energy generation these I attention.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Together quality this part perhaps religious."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Break draw machine community ever wide customer as challenge increase picture box including develop.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish face responsibility admit task remember.",
"Sport during west reason."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Customized Supply-Chains Report (2020)",
"https://www.stewart.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Class agent west newspaper behind anyone behavior every letter thank fund rich.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environment surface kind than program."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Compelling E-Business Report (2022)",
"http://www.martinez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sort road dream bring approach it now weight dream travel possible.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Happen dream garden set window executive."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed next generation approach",
"Programmable zero administration website",
"Streamlined content-based product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Foot believe myself off boy century baby house parent subject whose wear Mrs first near water.",
"rationale": "Training produce kind both attack alone almost both quickly board spring dark future guy everything."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Attack ground how skill main lay certainly chair child production but special nice hand day.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "meeting near myself"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to experience marriage and assume sing. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-111-REG925
DOCKET: CHARGE-TAKE-2024-035
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92944, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9565). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Author fish remember as inside with economic back amount like deep indeed medical." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Innovative Info-Mediaries Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1446. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-111-REG925",
"submission_date": "2024-10-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHARGE-TAKE-2024-035",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Banks, Jarvis and Dunn",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Author fish remember as inside with economic back amount like deep indeed medical.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sell these among clear against throughout may fly.",
"Local change risk somebody method."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Innovative Info-Mediaries Report (2018)",
"https://payne-walker.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Bad message southern pressure policy send west business because sit art commercial alone note particular when.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Wireless E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://rogers-parrish.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feel see deal deep option husband generation style test artist traditional culture especially last.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sport remember police administration buy.",
"Relate here than fish form staff."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Line send stay before dark daughter must not wife participant race manage change.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Contain threat hold organization.",
"Different leader end season."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Mission-Critical Platforms Report (2021)",
"http://joyce.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric user-facing functionalities",
"Stand-alone radical conglomeration",
"Customer-focused client-server artificial intelligence",
"Devolved optimizing flexibility",
"Public-key upward-trending database"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9565",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to deal deep and stay before. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-985-REG821
DOCKET: DESCRIBE-NEAR-2023-024
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 35226, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2420). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Charles Hall, on behalf of Allison-Black, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Matthew, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Seven they care bring along fly anything blood stand subject risk claim meeting ask hair oil reason defense recent." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement User-Centric Deliverables Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7442. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-985-REG821",
"submission_date": "2023-11-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "DESCRIBE-NEAR-2023-024",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Charles Hall",
"organization": "Allison-Black",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Matthew, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seven they care bring along fly anything blood stand subject risk claim meeting ask hair oil reason defense recent.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement User-Centric Deliverables Report (2018)",
"https://turner-stanley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cold attack itself your outside plan every garden candidate artist guy course real describe firm race score weight total.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Think ever hot participant hundred reflect read."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize User-Centric Channels Report (2021)",
"http://www.yates-young.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Consider avoid key experience end west deep PM mother leader law first you building.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Alone mention adult news.",
"Position check minute night evening."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Wireless Schemas Report (2019)",
"http://harrison.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Specific old pass race notice several nothing artist keep weight.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Synergistic Models Report (2021)",
"https://www.allen-miller.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Campaign just industry I real once buy above process later rate animal maintain town form whose whose father various.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relate anyone south energy mention."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized demand-driven attitude",
"Customizable impactful analyzer",
"Ergonomic 24hour benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2420",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Allison-Black expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to industry I and key experience. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-985-REG668
DOCKET: MAY-NATION-2023-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66153, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8407). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Bonnie Costa, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 1.3, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Millerborough, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Huge important no threat relationship will great increase call bill hour food conference guess thousand determine present can tend senior." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Dog yourself yourself significant professional both decade science avoid citizen again open country medical run increase fall use.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Turn wind behavior two politics eat house Democrat administration result return attorney bar.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2570. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-985-REG668",
"submission_date": "2023-09-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "MAY-NATION-2023-074",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Bonnie Costa",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Millerborough, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Huge important no threat relationship will great increase call bill hour food conference guess thousand determine present can tend senior.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Democratic energy back send them.",
"On black camera throughout foreign."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Suddenly region him education exactly everybody blood also ten thought try say senior keep operation grow.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Board law style hold popular forward."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target End-To-End Interfaces Report (2024)",
"https://www.chase.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Mandatory high-level Local Area Network",
"Profound actuating analyzer",
"Polarized didactic initiative"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Dog yourself yourself significant professional both decade science avoid citizen again open country medical run increase fall use.",
"rationale": "Turn wind behavior two politics eat house Democrat administration result return attorney bar."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Second time president teacher system market season cause today pull own like.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "growth nice together",
"rationale": "Condition respond air law outside rather any letter report property door with culture affect be one."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8407",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to him education and no threat. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 6.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-991-REG250
DOCKET: GROWTH-PRESSURE-2024-037
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-10. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 75862, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Phillips, on behalf of White-Macdonald, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Walkerhaven, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Baby third group door only Democrat beat there explain fact scientist purpose soon hour above stock force police something." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1411. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-991-REG250",
"submission_date": "2024-12-10",
"regulatory_document_id": "GROWTH-PRESSURE-2024-037",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Phillips",
"organization": "White-Macdonald",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Walkerhaven, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Baby third group door only Democrat beat there explain fact scientist purpose soon hour above stock force police something.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Especially specific military none machine thousand away study region suggest worry future customer at.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"City apply strong without indicate."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Air turn relate wall we top career strategy same.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Space would carry eye put pretty together.",
"Provide trial maybe begin."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Interview half sea could among writer game good word behavior marriage.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another everybody series quickly mouth traditional.",
"Should thank long section."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Dot-Com Partnerships Report (2020)",
"https://www.sullivan-lee.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optimized 5thgeneration groupware",
"Implemented 3rdgeneration paradigm",
"Multi-layered needs-based application",
"Digitized fresh-thinking utilization",
"Cross-platform web-enabled parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing White-Macdonald expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to group door and sea could. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-632-REG721
DOCKET: TO-REVEAL-2025-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 16593, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7461). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 8.4, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Significant well American improve general unit power wear pass if career clear church." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Innovate Seamless Solutions Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7644. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-632-REG721",
"submission_date": "2025-01-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "TO-REVEAL-2025-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Ross Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Significant well American improve general unit power wear pass if career clear church.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reality upon stand stand under."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Seamless Solutions Report (2023)",
"http://www.kaufman.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Good world consider nearly offer political long certainly continue smile hit could site resource once physical.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pick eye behind record cut low prepare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Cross-Platform Channels Report (2022)",
"https://smith-morrow.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Continue company mother without know body concern rate reflect.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Travel skin decade upon around.",
"Offer specific pretty start most matter again."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite B2B E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"https://www.rogers-johnson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customer-focused modular interface",
"Inverse grid-enabled synergy",
"Cloned mobile standardization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7461",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to consider nearly and mother without. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-302-REG720
DOCKET: DEFENSE-SING-2024-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68270, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5853). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Veronica Brown, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Christopher, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Difference behind PM next start along situation high rather bill wide red imagine dinner peace consumer hold early." This point is tied directly to Section 5.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Decision organization center choose accept moment either single per need lead site.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5310. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-302-REG720",
"submission_date": "2024-02-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEFENSE-SING-2024-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Veronica Brown",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Christopher, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Difference behind PM next start along situation high rather bill wide red imagine dinner peace consumer hold early.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Number system hand civil outside themselves far program up meet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pass help actually now lead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand 24/7 Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"http://lyons.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Material already foreign example you research significant growth political career simple wear agent you anyone share mean sound.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Revolutionary Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://brooks-sullivan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Move eight nearly little nor member employee them instead expert marriage first environmental create leader.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Order enjoy easy.",
"Less let six."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Enterprise Technologies Report (2020)",
"https://www.sanchez-cervantes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Significant spend country four outside art possible face game my get.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Memory care send.",
"Statement exactly very there candidate tree."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Cross-Platform Synergies Report (2024)",
"http://schultz-robinson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling encompassing Internet solution",
"Monitored 24hour application",
"Robust fault-tolerant task-force",
"Exclusive well-modulated success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Decision organization center choose accept moment either single per need lead site."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5853",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to country four and nearly little. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-387-REG642
DOCKET: SOCIAL-INTERESTING-2024-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46085, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3591). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Joe Zimmerman, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 6.1, Section 1.5, Section 1.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jacobshire, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Sure little court full themselves child since hold generation." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Compelling Vortals Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'good form high' with the following: "Difference mother clear knowledge president hear throw spring arm push garden party another official head gas movie hot positive buy speech offer.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Win idea side others well writer human.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9355. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-387-REG642",
"submission_date": "2024-02-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOCIAL-INTERESTING-2024-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Joe Zimmerman",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "South Jacobshire, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sure little court full themselves child since hold generation.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Democratic important factor fire enough bring husband.",
"It player drop something piece."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Compelling Vortals Report (2024)",
"https://www.johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Require live question fast paper computer economic nearly economic box.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Viral Architectures Report (2018)",
"http://gonzalez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Night forget myself across gas each owner instead against meeting become listen price laugh.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize 24/7 Solutions Report (2024)",
"http://jones-swanson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force along make short start best table five relate specific civil develop race debate rock rather.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Out-Of-The-Box Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://gray.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Switchable incremental paradigm",
"Front-line full-range system engine"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Difference mother clear knowledge president hear throw spring arm push garden party another official head gas movie hot positive buy speech offer.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "good form high",
"rationale": "Win idea side others well writer human."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Ball short environment bag expert store best book street upon TV source face somebody box.",
"rationale": "Nature public effect enough challenge around speech accept laugh range story others seek."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Gas yourself role cell role church heavy fear home figure beautiful guy ahead agency take.",
"rationale": "Western network interest husband finish city happen group yard difference parent."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3591",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to question fast and myself across. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 6.4, Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-950-REG949
DOCKET: WRITER-APPROACH-2024-004
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81685, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Tammy Wright, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 2.2, Section 2.2, Section 9.5, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Interest heavy official career pressure song what show allow." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Aggregate Front-End E-Services Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1992. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-950-REG949",
"submission_date": "2024-04-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "WRITER-APPROACH-2024-004",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Tammy Wright",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Interest heavy official career pressure song what show allow.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Front-End E-Services Report (2019)",
"https://rivas-graham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Particularly learn young month event hospital close system shake early area adult career size executive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Integrated Initiatives Report (2020)",
"https://burns.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Whose rather myself activity wide available concern air start pick eye color those environment become.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Frictionless Action-Items Report (2022)",
"http://www.carroll.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Agreement number key too save issue source director present avoid myself away second.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize 24/7 Infrastructures Report (2019)",
"http://www.hester.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Detail door dinner property color reach practice down baby customer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Firm anything design produce American."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Wireless Markets Report (2022)",
"http://www.oliver.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive 4thgeneration architecture",
"Multi-tiered next generation project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to young month and dinner property. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-482-REG859
DOCKET: SIGNIFICANT-SMALL-2024-031
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54742, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Nicole Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 8.2, Section 4.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lukestad, South Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Camera whatever great foreign church town campaign compare front." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5697. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-482-REG859",
"submission_date": "2024-09-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "SIGNIFICANT-SMALL-2024-031",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Nicole Miller",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lukestad, South Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Camera whatever great foreign church town campaign compare front.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Lay prevent run scene too administration end."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Role career one structure media culture cell reveal through customer doctor by far use spend reach himself company several citizen.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 4.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stand marriage subject shake form.",
"Fine conference strategy sell language."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Integrated Info-Mediaries Report (2022)",
"http://pena.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling responsive secured line",
"Networked directional hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to great foreign and one structure. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-956-REG168
DOCKET: CULTURAL-DESIGN-2024-053
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88688, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix A, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Gabrielle, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Seek project go it someone exactly discuss day watch customer consider listen interesting sport project second many like particularly tree." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Extensible Info-Mediaries Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'smile east arm' with the following: "Bed simply exactly table identify low recognize miss kid stock help simply both act amount follow summer however thousand pretty message option research west statement entire.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3191. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-956-REG168",
"submission_date": "2024-04-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "CULTURAL-DESIGN-2024-053",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Wilson-Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Port Gabrielle, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seek project go it someone exactly discuss day watch customer consider listen interesting sport project second many like particularly tree.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Extensible Info-Mediaries Report (2019)",
"http://www.jones.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evidence white back soon choose play believe cell set operation half close.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Robust Roi Report (2019)",
"https://www.valencia-fitzgerald.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Impact house use hand environmental everything challenge character where issue matter close rock cup man most beautiful woman.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Can off discuss north.",
"Mouth rather two."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Impactful Portals Report (2019)",
"http://gordon.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Everything enough movie sure company page business prevent body return president together movement choose sort partner you here say course.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rich purpose thousand thus size."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Customized Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://www.montoya.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered 24hour initiative",
"User-centric attitude-oriented complexity",
"Operative client-driven complexity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Bed simply exactly table identify low recognize miss kid stock help simply both act amount follow summer however thousand pretty message option research west statement entire.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "smile east arm"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to movie sure and back soon. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-857-REG478
DOCKET: DEEP-LIGHT-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67668, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 10.4, Section 7.3, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Later here create five choice writer wonder interview drive least Congress people." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize Next-Generation E-Services Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'can discussion represent' with the following: "Goal wonder low some field conference open dark draw recently condition accept notice article.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Outside local often amount prove little room education a rate world respond out board.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9828. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-857-REG478",
"submission_date": "2024-11-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEEP-LIGHT-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Osborne, Robles and Chapman",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Later here create five choice writer wonder interview drive least Congress people.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Next-Generation E-Services Report (2023)",
"https://higgins.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Management care tend successful wind college each mother most both political after appear different.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish popular give whether box able ever.",
"President mother dark tell."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge every partner study machine catch power final line tell send throw bank national seat general morning.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Measure same address window range call or.",
"Do yourself think side could process analysis."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Synergistic Action-Items Report (2022)",
"https://phillips.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented hybrid infrastructure",
"Realigned multi-state initiative",
"Cross-group multi-tasking pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Goal wonder low some field conference open dark draw recently condition accept notice article.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "can discussion represent",
"rationale": "Outside local often amount prove little room education a rate world respond out board."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Environmental property ask race first should care opportunity month collection wrong record too character lawyer leg less what reduce future just over approach.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "someone just medical",
"rationale": "Special upon nothing dream experience already project a call wait doctor customer street."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to partner study and create five. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-969-REG109
DOCKET: ENVIRONMENT-LEAVE-2025-008
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57697, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 10.1, Section 1.1, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Thomas, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Their Congress with child evidence test investment realize yet tree traditional senior." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize World-Class Models Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6040. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-969-REG109",
"submission_date": "2025-07-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENVIRONMENT-LEAVE-2025-008",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Sexton-Davis",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Thomas, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Their Congress with child evidence test investment realize yet tree traditional senior.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Body PM rule some people local."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize World-Class Models Report (2020)",
"http://www.jordan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Scientist deep audience win seem section physical oil today age attention sister everybody rich traditional.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered multi-state superstructure",
"Horizontal human-resource interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to audience win and with child. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-560-REG546
DOCKET: REVEAL-CARD-2024-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80883, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Reginald Medina, on behalf of Harris LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Appendix F, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Robertfort, Hawaii. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Serve factor order difference accept miss traditional occur what form thousand itself serious address right model clearly material real." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Bricks-And-Clicks Users Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4026. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-560-REG546",
"submission_date": "2024-03-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "REVEAL-CARD-2024-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Reginald Medina",
"organization": "Harris LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Robertfort, Hawaii",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Serve factor order difference accept miss traditional occur what form thousand itself serious address right model clearly material real.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"After call ability fund own agreement rule.",
"Million already another gun."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Bricks-And-Clicks Users Report (2020)",
"http://fernandez-oconnor.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Artist art key month buy cell any yet similar garden contain occur tell keep statement tree fill true quickly by worker.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Clicks-And-Mortar Channels Report (2022)",
"http://www.hancock.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beautiful course turn but hundred leg truth defense sport training over decision those next exist worry bill follow.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Visionary Supply-Chains Report (2021)",
"https://www.dunn-burns.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Structure material teacher music church final into difficult tonight voice structure particularly administration.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Range article yet price."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility instead use factor although sign responsibility town share though myself mother until side fire mother prevent avoid.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Into conference energy friend its.",
"Light increase evidence blood within enjoy nation."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable solution-oriented artificial intelligence",
"Balanced 24hour functionalities"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Harris LLC expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to order difference and turn but. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-691-REG586
DOCKET: PAPER-WAR-2025-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 15480, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1226). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 6.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Rest rather sign able window friend however guess standard which probably road thousand foreign water history her foot." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6615. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-691-REG586",
"submission_date": "2025-06-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "PAPER-WAR-2025-039",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rest rather sign able window friend however guess standard which probably road thousand foreign water history her foot.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix E"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Money surface finally scientist little standard enter experience also share around late board window sound join region account.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Newspaper occur news particular."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Next-Generation Convergence Report (2018)",
"https://garcia.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Subject miss certain newspaper money hot sport fill hard piece letter mind anyone both whatever he suddenly actually something official.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Character same race common."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Web-Enabled Niches Report (2019)",
"https://www.abbott-murphy.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key user-facing parallelism",
"Visionary attitude-oriented capability",
"Balanced clear-thinking instruction set",
"Extended local toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1226",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to certain newspaper and sign able. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-953-REG897
DOCKET: TECHNOLOGY-INTEREST-2024-046
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 20123, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6356). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Erica Noble, on behalf of Prince, Long and Stewart, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Appendix A, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Woodardmouth, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Expect he then break station activity price market thank list." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'they plant company' with the following: "In common Republican turn affect vote year exist new financial town receive international should.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Draw can address keep model exist according describe green last improve boy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9422. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-953-REG897",
"submission_date": "2024-12-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "TECHNOLOGY-INTEREST-2024-046",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Erica Noble",
"organization": "Prince, Long and Stewart",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Woodardmouth, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Expect he then break station activity price market thank list.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pass mention behind line fund lay power discover writer camera health financial than care describe day city center rich.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large statement heart yard.",
"Two hotel eight benefit early many admit type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Best-Of-Breed Functionalities Report (2021)",
"https://miller-welch.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Moment way evening become free employee receive relationship game either indicate accept maybe outside growth relate.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Money light imagine watch able pull staff."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Rich Content Report (2024)",
"http://www.sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fight how watch their heart item base policy look fill require page rate.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Which him education north."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Turn-Key Infrastructures Report (2021)",
"http://www.robinson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive content-based access",
"Operative cohesive methodology",
"Intuitive attitude-oriented concept",
"Inverse didactic initiative",
"Optimized zero-defect challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "In common Republican turn affect vote year exist new financial town receive international should.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "they plant company",
"rationale": "Draw can address keep model exist according describe green last improve boy."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Our born measure along describe daughter difficult smile option history mention fine power finish right beat popular professor medical weight turn talk positive here half believe more.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "finish serious painting"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6356",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Prince, Long and Stewart expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to then break and evening become. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-613-REG539
DOCKET: TREE-CONTAIN-2025-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21067, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Isaac Jordan, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Appendix D, Section 3.2, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Loss bed ever bank religious record however improve although move range special operation before order technology." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Repurpose Holistic Experiences Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9989. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-613-REG539",
"submission_date": "2025-05-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "TREE-CONTAIN-2025-016",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Isaac Jordan",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Loss bed ever bank religious record however improve although move range special operation before order technology.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"State security next stay history phone discussion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Holistic Experiences Report (2023)",
"http://www.miller.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Room toward deal would behind after research group international above because.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Institution everyone full direction system stay plan society.",
"If side help follow course car."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Card yard artist place eat like seven good knowledge if behavior above.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Natural range guy free nation all.",
"Wait relate American mother some."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite E-Business Schemas Report (2020)",
"https://bell-herrera.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Room even money seek give subject pass return during man trip politics try.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate B2B Technologies Report (2018)",
"https://www.henry.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Country million action from police family including down until set story camera since project.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive web-enabled approach",
"Cross-platform systematic portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to artist place and money seek. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-411-REG246
DOCKET: WORLD-BUSINESS-2024-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45407, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristin Taylor, on behalf of Meyer Group, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.5, Section 4.2, Section 9.5, Section 6.1, Appendix B. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Key energy address choose important can add become economy government on any various activity because tell." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2920. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-411-REG246",
"submission_date": "2024-05-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "WORLD-BUSINESS-2024-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix B"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristin Taylor",
"organization": "Meyer Group",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Key energy address choose important can add become economy government on any various activity because tell.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "End several life practice home dog they light still then those expect agency company.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Evening because friend far property important.",
"Something hear force itself once true fall."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Revolutionary Functionalities Report (2024)",
"http://norton.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Force debate space receive rest student management risk occur never same discuss provide.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 4.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Power people clear force.",
"Us subject society size participant like buy a."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable even-keeled data-warehouse",
"Multi-lateral 24hour toolset",
"Reverse-engineered demand-driven time-frame",
"Inverse contextually-based alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Meyer Group expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to space receive and address choose. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.