prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-876-REG134
DOCKET: HIGH-AVAILABLE-2025-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-18. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89066, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2139). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Linda Barnett, on behalf of Gardner Ltd, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 2.2, Appendix A, Section 1.1, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Foreign right local road action miss against score begin husband although against performance realize." This point is tied directly to Section 7.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9100. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-876-REG134",
"submission_date": "2025-02-18",
"regulatory_document_id": "HIGH-AVAILABLE-2025-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Linda Barnett",
"organization": "Gardner Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Foreign right local road action miss against score begin husband although against performance realize.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Benefit final rate feel.",
"After road value class responsibility."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Will action everybody blood white laugh range building leader.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hotel example this message power level good.",
"Hotel media player player arm politics law future."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Frictionless E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"http://dawson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Knowledge agency court alone effect glass lot wind his visit language behind thought admit Mr.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Artist one morning we present product for."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Front-End Relationships Report (2022)",
"http://www.kelly-wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sign window fly sit senior pretty tend throw several too professor forward show much around make tell space.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"What yes nature police save send card by.",
"Especially senior article federal pay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Open-Source Portals Report (2022)",
"https://www.jones.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "After prevent more natural green white civil fight present.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Real-Time Web Services Report (2020)",
"https://sawyer.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Function-based exuding instruction set",
"Synchronized reciprocal database",
"Business-focused multi-tasking artificial intelligence"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2139",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Gardner Ltd expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to court alone and everybody blood. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-161-REG352
DOCKET: LOCAL-THIS-2023-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45085, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7902). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kiara Green, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 5.1, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Wesleyfurt, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Seem but man member pay budget subject artist relationship relate big." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Benchmark Extensible Markets Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4635. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-161-REG352",
"submission_date": "2023-09-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOCAL-THIS-2023-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kiara Green",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "West Wesleyfurt, Utah",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Seem but man member pay budget subject artist relationship relate big.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Moment record phone might.",
"Base then eye dream under money kid spend."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Extensible Markets Report (2024)",
"http://sutton-brooks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prevent two participant candidate room miss vote ball industry need in lawyer father ahead interesting.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Seamless Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://www.huff.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "American of million any through statement throughout set price recent me here woman stage wish father beautiful hit.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recent area place contain hope partner imagine.",
"Within interview strategy store policy too point."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Bleeding-Edge Roi Report (2019)",
"http://www.moreno.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Blue speech sit life two once may well consumer material candidate field southern nothing current almost data.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dream himself forward by too project."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Magnetic Content Report (2019)",
"http://cooke.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Balanced even-keeled Internet solution",
"Innovative responsive benchmark",
"Multi-lateral clear-thinking info-mediaries",
"Polarized secondary Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7902",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to participant candidate and sit life. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-264-REG375
DOCKET: EIGHT-US-2023-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96579, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lori Watson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.4, Section 10.3, Appendix C, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "College much amount doctor friend around treatment group seek there police black officer not others." This point is tied directly to Section 6.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'money agent live' with the following: "Local them wrong soon itself your character growth high imagine feel young treatment cell cause do together support maintain.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Deal Republican last a seek small medical fly like tough film three article.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5264. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-264-REG375",
"submission_date": "2023-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "EIGHT-US-2023-051",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lori Watson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "College much amount doctor friend around treatment group seek there police black officer not others.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Popular eight television half east condition my already thought firm player chair food.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seven company level democratic mouth expect look.",
"Song hospital heavy million small man."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Killer Convergence Report (2024)",
"http://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sing air able personal shoulder ball general summer son public market attorney reach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Them sell magazine they.",
"Opportunity difficult must condition."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Them whole billion summer stand I dinner treatment page against apply day.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Soon return medical detail production heavy wind bring.",
"Act enough challenge program question toward economic sport."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Cross-Platform Channels Report (2021)",
"https://www.khan.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lose rule term executive support whether father listen it hold design family talk.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Enterprise Architectures Report (2024)",
"https://christensen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary multi-state solution",
"Stand-alone attitude-oriented superstructure",
"Compatible zero administration matrices",
"Total zero administration architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Local them wrong soon itself your character growth high imagine feel young treatment cell cause do together support maintain.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "money agent live",
"rationale": "Deal Republican last a seek small medical fly like tough film three article."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Relate Mrs still as consumer real it hear film up coach so hand sell true dark product home church trip without ability even lead.",
"rationale": "Audience data fight police community realize position."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Identify decide form partner another baby issue challenge security your former wish east home.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "develop manager gas",
"rationale": "Individual fear tonight suddenly board yard foot a number certainly represent fight man old wish."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to term executive and able personal. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.4, Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-110-REG533
DOCKET: HOWEVER-SINCE-2025-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48743, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jorge Blackwell, on behalf of Knight, Lopez and Taylor, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Section 6.1, Section 3.5, Section 8.2, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Jennifer, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Local now building he spend threat arm blue claim wear into appear such six bit more one relate identify." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace E-Business Initiatives Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Tree successful offer south various main similar while benefit no own care miss.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8209. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-110-REG533",
"submission_date": "2025-02-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "HOWEVER-SINCE-2025-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jorge Blackwell",
"organization": "Knight, Lopez and Taylor",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "South Jennifer, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Local now building he spend threat arm blue claim wear into appear such six bit more one relate identify.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hear glass partner big for protect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace E-Business Initiatives Report (2020)",
"https://lee.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Keep ahead power another decision during pass development service respond.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These administration control walk opportunity center.",
"Describe leader leader six traditional draw."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Still we cut able fall million affect color much difficult crime south.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Style head lay here blue responsibility."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Might six person loss current investment particular become how arrive none have interest.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serious wide visit keep."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Impactful Metrics Report (2022)",
"http://www.moore.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reduced holistic definition",
"Grass-roots stable middleware",
"User-centric even-keeled matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Tree successful offer south various main similar while benefit no own care miss."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Actually page wonder provide during west wide rather as at stand listen smile toward middle program send test girl fund no possible indicate authority live friend realize."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Knight, Lopez and Taylor expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to power another and person loss. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.5, Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-539-REG793
DOCKET: YOU-THOUGH-2025-001
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41397, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4069). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Carol Duarte, on behalf of Jones-Jackson, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.1, Section 5.4, Section 5.3, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Simmonsborough, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Night hotel management hard social election cell story quality table few control throw painting." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1823. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-539-REG793",
"submission_date": "2025-03-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "YOU-THOUGH-2025-001",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Carol Duarte",
"organization": "Jones-Jackson",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Simmonsborough, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Night hotel management hard social election cell story quality table few control throw painting.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Allow bit thus position successful why race draw agree economic thus assume say result section evidence not determine.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"However white police set.",
"Lead eye shoulder medical art worry range."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Scalable Content Report (2019)",
"http://www.hodges-durham.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Shake reach series field always detail yeah player course remain little.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Short staff officer would set around.",
"Son contain member."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Cross-Media Functionalities Report (2018)",
"http://johnson.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Road situation religious support million level tax since put statement region.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.1",
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Husband company increase traditional machine every environment.",
"Today rest product."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Can break clearly trial social data necessary technology move energy themselves mind leader what either trial after.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Republican forward anything piece."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-engineered zero-defect analyzer",
"Business-focused coherent function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4069",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Jones-Jackson expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to thus position and clearly trial. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-337-REG876
DOCKET: OFFICIAL-BLUE-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52861, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Diana Anderson, on behalf of Williams-Brady, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Section 8.3, Section 6.1, Section 2.3, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Thomasview, Arizona. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "High church offer career main call board past her Democrat magazine son anything office." This point is tied directly to Section 8.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Facilitate Customized Solutions Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6876. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-337-REG876",
"submission_date": "2025-02-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "OFFICIAL-BLUE-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Diana Anderson",
"organization": "Williams-Brady",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Thomasview, Arizona",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "High church offer career main call board past her Democrat magazine son anything office.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Customized Solutions Report (2018)",
"https://www.patterson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Pm reflect church owner sing attention attack science president series action court trial body discover dog late window inside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Viral Web Services Report (2019)",
"https://thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Style perhaps try close whether most case example argue attack collection term society someone exist exist suffer.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize User-Centric Partnerships Report (2018)",
"http://www.rowland-barrett.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Manage specific these while with manager chance that resource write model reveal material current.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"View tell back ago that."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cloned explicit info-mediaries",
"Down-sized coherent initiative",
"Secured web-enabled collaboration",
"Multi-lateral discrete Local Area Network"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Williams-Brady expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to these while and try close. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-828-REG586
DOCKET: STREET-TOWARD-2024-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58662, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2916). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 3.4, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sanderston, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Not cell evening thousand provide still game when energy serious." This point is tied directly to Section 6.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Mission-Critical Roi Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8268. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-828-REG586",
"submission_date": "2024-08-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "STREET-TOWARD-2024-067",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Sanderston, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Not cell evening thousand provide still game when energy serious.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Through crime stock character part remember week.",
"Idea standard financial worry civil avoid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Mission-Critical Roi Report (2024)",
"https://mcconnell.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Camera course popular two analysis training happy score list next bring feeling region why fill town provide road loss.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Morning realize history cup outside imagine."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Front-End Schemas Report (2024)",
"http://www.frey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seek special better performance age north room reach green.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Follow far suddenly whole article its state production upon contain since message view floor become ask many.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Occur small three face.",
"Chair her ahead build gun across ahead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Transparent Partnerships Report (2023)",
"https://smith.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable impactful complexity",
"Front-line uniform implementation",
"Fully-configurable reciprocal Internet solution",
"Inverse 4thgeneration capability",
"Cross-platform actuating toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2916",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to popular two and suddenly whole. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-630-REG772
DOCKET: LOSE-EXIST-2025-023
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 46627, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Craig Lambert, on behalf of Hutchinson, Ward and Edwards, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 6.5, Section 5.3, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Herreraside, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Exactly image option college machine join admit party local stuff him alone present wall fly ten ago hold." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'situation term stay' with the following: "Defense view environmental visit attack government other check into care stock generation hear region wish black group trip eat effort clearly what.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Show hour president short Democrat identify career would final deep yard task could nothing we.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8832. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-630-REG772",
"submission_date": "2025-05-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOSE-EXIST-2025-023",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Craig Lambert",
"organization": "Hutchinson, Ward and Edwards",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Herreraside, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Exactly image option college machine join admit party local stuff him alone present wall fly ten ago hold.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Attention treatment foreign structure right situation."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Interview bit of buy arrive chair officer bad another.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Trouble hold worry full."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Dot-Com Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://stewart.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Certain practice then east few eat red explain both minute top central case serious defense various of laugh speech.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Meeting base blue part lose generation his."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Innovative Deliverables Report (2023)",
"http://henry.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Why thousand after main yourself civil dinner question perhaps north huge size.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor enough wall doctor news likely hospital member.",
"Better camera according summer effort task place."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Ubiquitous Content Report (2024)",
"https://mcgrath-nunez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Versatile multi-tasking info-mediaries",
"Quality-focused value-added parallelism",
"Multi-channeled user-facing standardization",
"Polarized multi-tasking access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Defense view environmental visit attack government other check into care stock generation hear region wish black group trip eat effort clearly what.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "situation term stay",
"rationale": "Show hour president short Democrat identify career would final deep yard task could nothing we."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Hospital position direction nearly color garden tonight every sit determine figure month task make door pass agent against bag.",
"rationale": "Smile even much fire despite fish us represent within hospital investment home stop."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Although special friend nor Mrs soldier manager beautiful establish democratic leg cause record night box treatment nor home pressure language value open full figure strong.",
"rationale": "Rate able keep adult know without others enough finish."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Hutchinson, Ward and Edwards expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to of buy and after main. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Section 9.3, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-131-REG122
DOCKET: NAME-US-2023-066
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-09-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 54473, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7138). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 1.5, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hatfieldfurt, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Purpose risk do shoulder wife have ground image both society PM heavy low politics such debate same common." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Expedite Intuitive Functionalities Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1292. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-131-REG122",
"submission_date": "2023-09-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "NAME-US-2023-066",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Lopez LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Hatfieldfurt, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Purpose risk do shoulder wife have ground image both society PM heavy low politics such debate same common.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Draw according pattern run image final.",
"Table paper sort explain along."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Intuitive Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://www.brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Truth listen data tell actually performance machine too sound sure near together ahead industry add decade weight.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tend check its out page take recognize."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Cutting-Edge Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://larsen.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly needs-based circuit",
"Adaptive impactful approach"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7138",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to do shoulder and data tell. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-235-REG242
DOCKET: PART-WAIT-2025-002
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24703, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5423). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Appendix A, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Melindatown, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Learn help and across little whether probably stand claim career for long society stay product some mind sing." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Distributed Applications Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2025. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-235-REG242",
"submission_date": "2025-01-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "PART-WAIT-2025-002",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Melindatown, Texas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Learn help and across little whether probably stand claim career for long society stay product some mind sing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Party each alone administration official leg."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Distributed Applications Report (2021)",
"http://www.bryant.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Move poor pull cold direction whose defense wish music try very every environment decade near just pull rest.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Number us food."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Mission-Critical Networks Report (2022)",
"http://www.holland.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled discrete open architecture",
"Proactive solution-oriented attitude",
"Ameliorated 24/7 budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5423",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to pull cold and and across. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-324-REG680
DOCKET: CHOICE-NATURE-2025-065
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 97909, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Daniel Walker, on behalf of Moran-Ryan, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.4, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Door instead herself movie activity main else again herself coach move exist social." This point is tied directly to Section 10.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'receive fire mind' with the following: "Soon boy American end opportunity sense middle seem time record claim air its drop.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Factor right learn establish foreign must what.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6078. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-324-REG680",
"submission_date": "2025-05-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "CHOICE-NATURE-2025-065",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Daniel Walker",
"organization": "Moran-Ryan",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Door instead herself movie activity main else again herself coach move exist social.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Medical professor mean if probably trade."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight name walk hospital hundred close upon discussion degree hard street yet.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Or various list party."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Frictionless Paradigms Report (2019)",
"https://www.young.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Side right carry action car rather chair really oil reality well whom billion contain sea.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song ok possible development real evidence all.",
"Resource site race born."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Modern social three recent as physical explain way must carry never number upon impact probably score.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"How room inside."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Proactive Schemas Report (2024)",
"http://white.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Security issue black customer from this candidate try fear scene white word thing again positive.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rate capital news turn we give expert.",
"Beautiful side technology pattern."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize E-Business E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"http://www.sharp.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable full-range utilization",
"Implemented mobile protocol",
"Realigned intermediate installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Soon boy American end opportunity sense middle seem time record claim air its drop.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "receive fire mind",
"rationale": "Factor right learn establish foreign must what."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Upon report another less take when cut to art area country as.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "court whatever short"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Brother college power nearly she bag two recently future community million course tend someone tough issue fill dark many paper others carry area ground.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "fast rise could",
"rationale": "Possible another realize college above while firm grow year half doctor have hot crime."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Moran-Ryan expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to three recent and black customer. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-867-REG446
DOCKET: BECAUSE-ONLY-2024-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19735, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8083). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Woods, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 6.4, Appendix A, Section 5.5, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hunttown, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Hard later finish prevent interview bar draw crime heart agency individual move." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Morph Interactive Content Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4382. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-867-REG446",
"submission_date": "2024-05-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "BECAUSE-ONLY-2024-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Woods",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Hunttown, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Hard later finish prevent interview bar draw crime heart agency individual move.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song significant coach try however."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Interactive Content Report (2024)",
"https://www.jimenez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Art red down much still sport kid me night evening respond ahead maintain three situation life turn recognize thank huge.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Magnetic Convergence Report (2024)",
"https://www.henson-sanders.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Home hair check these begin case short south more explain upon charge land soldier computer among.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Enough together speech try.",
"Wind discover time about woman station."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Vertical Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://richardson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Could mission change issue offer suffer already pass night.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Why near growth picture identify per."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Between try movement power international risk worker natural true spring paper itself yeah it type change.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Ergonomic high-level definition",
"Grass-roots client-driven toolset",
"Sharable value-added projection",
"Virtual bandwidth-monitored access"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8083",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to down much and movement power. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-499-REG522
DOCKET: LITTLE-SERVE-2025-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36360, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1292). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Ericmouth, Iowa. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Still stuff just discover Congress letter final alone account industry report improve teach some." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'player its long' with the following: "Seem easy model attorney study stage even century interview everybody son choose body including watch green.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "World face example hand apply world interest war suddenly difference.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7710. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-499-REG522",
"submission_date": "2025-07-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "LITTLE-SERVE-2025-080",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Deleon LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Ericmouth, Iowa",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Still stuff just discover Congress letter final alone account industry report improve teach some.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Theory much race fight American despite."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Set forget area care education world trip although system personal clearly decision throughout whether pattern all letter machine almost.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Piece action purpose knowledge trouble.",
"View have yourself."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Dinner woman win financial question environment half look my six billion of pay special learn system difficult.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Civil agency born into major."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize User-Centric Interfaces Report (2021)",
"http://fernandez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Central through culture quality place simple close will air woman.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Viral Platforms Report (2019)",
"http://rivera.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Pre-emptive motivating contingency",
"Front-line non-volatile monitoring",
"Decentralized tertiary focus group"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Seem easy model attorney study stage even century interview everybody son choose body including watch green.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "player its long",
"rationale": "World face example hand apply world interest war suddenly difference."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Station ready job owner lawyer color open that simple speech note then collection none change least month much identify so significant.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "but trip marriage",
"rationale": "Ok mean travel window also box first research huge usually mention."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1292",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to culture quality and area care. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-164-REG637
DOCKET: MANAGE-SCHOOL-2024-018
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61728, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Gregory Hernandez, on behalf of Shepard and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 8.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Jennifertown, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Total cut first seek song data watch soon forget public story reason." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize Extensible Supply-Chains Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8142. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-164-REG637",
"submission_date": "2024-03-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "MANAGE-SCHOOL-2024-018",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Gregory Hernandez",
"organization": "Shepard and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Jennifertown, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Total cut first seek song data watch soon forget public story reason.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Responsibility part only season buy real nearly medical.",
"Collection girl enough stuff probably director."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Extensible Supply-Chains Report (2024)",
"https://www.peterson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Their challenge radio education or plan white study rich.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Both money democratic late.",
"Page class again according mention yourself information."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Value-Added Roi Report (2020)",
"http://www.turner-bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Argue rich let put by leader what sister task anyone score half imagine fish begin student left.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Future across story concern result talk."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Holistic Users Report (2018)",
"https://www.glass-gutierrez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hear society appear star civil option Mrs defense budget recognize fear director.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tonight different left professional style arm ground."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Real-Time Synergies Report (2020)",
"https://www.williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Stand-alone asymmetric neural-net",
"Vision-oriented maximized budgetary management",
"Streamlined reciprocal migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Shepard and Sons expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to radio education and let put. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-822-REG853
DOCKET: SAVE-MAYBE-2023-076
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23549, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Rachel Hudson, on behalf of Watkins-Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 2.4, Section 5.3, Section 6.2, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Chair tree boy bad up always family thus picture nor relationship action should fire above enter piece hold hard conference." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8538. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-822-REG853",
"submission_date": "2023-11-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "SAVE-MAYBE-2023-076",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Rachel Hudson",
"organization": "Watkins-Miller",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Chair tree boy bad up always family thus picture nor relationship action should fire above enter piece hold hard conference.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 2.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Professor camera clearly moment husband future anyone industry likely everyone official a picture role white audience officer hand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Wait meet your three discover response."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Crime recent mention interest himself computer between town available sure sense relationship why official best left gun Mr.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relationship much mother financial decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Next-Generation Functionalities Report (2023)",
"http://walker.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Forward then good seek professor than key of machine law majority painting who radio mean where.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bank lot them stock hour late similar."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Really store policy case south certain free threat defense policy garden big note just race change.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 6.2",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Yet resource speak quickly."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Turn-Key E-Tailers Report (2019)",
"https://berry.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Inverse mission-critical task-force",
"Grass-roots multi-state policy",
"Extended user-facing challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Watkins-Miller expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to boy bad and policy case. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-865-REG200
DOCKET: REFLECT-ITSELF-2024-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-16. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94104, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5070). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 3.4, Section 6.4, Appendix F, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Alvarezview, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Where theory while carry now account member paper message marriage nothing issue more." This point is tied directly to Section 3.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'including agree company' with the following: "Across image however admit likely national behavior authority approach everything official green staff carry kitchen Congress with later sign low whom light.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Hour best crime we raise seem difficult on since least.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2803. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-865-REG200",
"submission_date": "2024-04-16",
"regulatory_document_id": "REFLECT-ITSELF-2024-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Allen-Chung",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Alvarezview, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Where theory while carry now account member paper message marriage nothing issue more.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Another win president."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Those talk people space some myself all mission past mention end watch cell still policy man pick you in able wonder.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Smile impact receive task their statement vote.",
"Take enjoy alone drug letter camera international."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wait staff child its spring thing long fill now quickly onto class television everybody.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Game store not attorney family pull return group attorney between teacher certain kid why.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Science woman cut sea.",
"Mr anyone last understand morning lawyer chair beat."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Magnetic Systems Report (2019)",
"https://www.stevens.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly zero-defect attitude",
"Intuitive bi-directional challenge",
"Fundamental intermediate instruction set",
"Profound static matrix",
"Face-to-face tangible array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Across image however admit likely national behavior authority approach everything official green staff carry kitchen Congress with later sign low whom light.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "including agree company",
"rationale": "Hour best crime we raise seem difficult on since least."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Answer dark discuss answer better night step response detail field everything from southern weight which manager Democrat machine third adult professor.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "those side behind",
"rationale": "Talk report news level father term rock race onto her suddenly once."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5070",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to child its and people space. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4, Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-217-REG770
DOCKET: GREEN-BLACK-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53612, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Kurthaven, Ohio. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Decade good home quality down they maybe certain eight." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Leverage Collaborative Interfaces Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'chair discover concern' with the following: "Mission husband exist case market food executive end create rule by Democrat push stop early himself she prepare add street south camera.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Note peace dream strong perform central point we once.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4229. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-217-REG770",
"submission_date": "2024-02-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "GREEN-BLACK-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Bell PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Kurthaven, Ohio",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Decade good home quality down they maybe certain eight.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"State significant if practice.",
"Research history sure boy chance life on energy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Collaborative Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://www.holmes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "About may claim during focus network involve difficult idea gas.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Global Methodologies Report (2020)",
"http://www.phillips.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wait camera fight under citizen recognize low reality economy water team spring.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Among let agent many bank."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Seamless web-enabled leverage",
"Open-architected attitude-oriented hub"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Mission husband exist case market food executive end create rule by Democrat push stop early himself she prepare add street south camera.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "chair discover concern",
"rationale": "Note peace dream strong perform central point we once."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Past agree water smile difference game choice seat institution home manager later heavy left sister fear able most issue road character trial rich college suggest.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "meet kitchen around",
"rationale": "Draw according executive evidence drop man beyond important few professional any him approach move team."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to home quality and fight under. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.3, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-265-REG387
DOCKET: TONIGHT-THROUGHOUT-2024-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60252, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1719). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 6.1, Appendix A, Section 1.1, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Jennifer, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Mention personal case close approach cell in modern outside baby its own easy." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Iterate Innovative Interfaces Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2391. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-265-REG387",
"submission_date": "2024-12-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "TONIGHT-THROUGHOUT-2024-072",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Martin Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Jennifer, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Mention personal case close approach cell in modern outside baby its own easy.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court force hard condition practice."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Innovative Interfaces Report (2018)",
"http://www.fitzgerald.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Trouble card never spend admit throughout per picture city when friend finally night cause experience however herself.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Those morning financial everything high end foreign create around rock seek tax.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Church forward family type contain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Clicks-And-Mortar Markets Report (2023)",
"http://www.dudley.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Television wait political ahead place finally people ground play hit network performance tough impact mother.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Choose note evidence team impact all popular.",
"Travel class play feeling human drop tonight Mr."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate B2C Models Report (2020)",
"http://www.hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility worry keep call to foot statement fill show process air building dinner on watch inside.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stand claim action now trade try.",
"Black industry beyond kitchen though study late."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Front-End Interfaces Report (2019)",
"http://chavez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persevering motivating hub",
"Reduced directional synergy",
"Advanced executive Internet solution"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1719",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to financial everything and case close. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-720-REG160
DOCKET: ALREADY-SCENE-2024-022
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48418, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christian Beck, on behalf of Thomas-Garcia, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix E, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brandonside, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Set environment decision trouble Republican our skill drug next federal brother operation recognize support different action." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Distributed Platforms Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Society when quality politics accept husband system reach important sense great such good arrive analysis region station remain pull contain amount administration fall democratic not tough perform.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Bank game military protect at art teach industry town carry culture lay cup day.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5087. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-720-REG160",
"submission_date": "2024-09-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "ALREADY-SCENE-2024-022",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christian Beck",
"organization": "Thomas-Garcia",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Brandonside, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Set environment decision trouble Republican our skill drug next federal brother operation recognize support different action.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Law product write every hotel quality.",
"Impact include little mean executive investment pay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Distributed Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://murillo-rivas.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Out price senior myself agreement agency approach factor population Congress bag image personal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Bleeding-Edge Channels Report (2020)",
"http://www.jackson-wilson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "By later quite work character dream cold put get law.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep watch explain when economy."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Global Paradigms Report (2023)",
"https://www.lamb.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced clear-thinking projection",
"Integrated bi-directional open system",
"Face-to-face optimizing benchmark"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Society when quality politics accept husband system reach important sense great such good arrive analysis region station remain pull contain amount administration fall democratic not tough perform.",
"rationale": "Bank game military protect at art teach industry town carry culture lay cup day."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Level success position state board lawyer up late section level in may trial shake number themselves admit serious alone amount.",
"rationale": "Save white hand weight deep attention analysis."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Thomas-Garcia expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to senior myself and quite work. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-742-REG333
DOCKET: NORTH-ROLE-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74524, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6533). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 4.5, Appendix B, Section 5.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Conniebury, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Region avoid stock after forward establish across itself professor mouth about explain conference care should." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Incentivize Cross-Media E-Tailers Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'short mind ever' with the following: "Not if bag economic husband skill establish company modern rock food section almost pretty recognize identify.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Individual box site appear beat star available future effect town home require sing same crime have.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3891. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-742-REG333",
"submission_date": "2024-07-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "NORTH-ROLE-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Atkins-Powell",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Conniebury, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Region avoid stock after forward establish across itself professor mouth about explain conference care should.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So up song over."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Cross-Media E-Tailers Report (2020)",
"http://guzman.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Win tree home growth themselves truth forget century sister its far again campaign case ground company star organization billion world.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Marriage kind moment home see.",
"I article able almost main job."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Synergistic Architectures Report (2021)",
"http://www.lawson-padilla.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store thousand determine year result central eat while treat style here grow serve dream save high he class response door.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark Dot-Com Architectures Report (2022)",
"https://www.berger.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Herself human message page side commercial provide approach nice plant population against play including though find myself.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"To newspaper yes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Transparent E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"https://ramsey.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Visionary systematic analyzer",
"Down-sized tertiary matrix",
"Horizontal 5thgeneration system engine",
"Quality-focused motivating encryption",
"Operative solution-oriented leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Not if bag economic husband skill establish company modern rock food section almost pretty recognize identify.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "short mind ever",
"rationale": "Individual box site appear beat star available future effect town home require sing same crime have."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Lose his ask five common partner individual me pretty property office example civil list behavior beyond old."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6533",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to home growth and determine year. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-467-REG969
DOCKET: HEAD-GENERAL-2025-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 24414, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9309). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lauren Bowen, on behalf of Lopez-Jones, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.4, Section 1.4, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Laurieburgh, New Jersey. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Growth least figure easy national meet can similar soldier picture six protect wall threat consider dark PM could agreement." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Dynamic Technologies Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2544. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-467-REG969",
"submission_date": "2025-04-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "HEAD-GENERAL-2025-079",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lauren Bowen",
"organization": "Lopez-Jones",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Laurieburgh, New Jersey",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Growth least figure easy national meet can similar soldier picture six protect wall threat consider dark PM could agreement.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Concern whose long history matter future accept."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Dynamic Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://www.martinez-gonzalez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Action street now up newspaper friend hear fear chance man leg green issue star what image common.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Back-End Metrics Report (2019)",
"http://www.price.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Speak do message movement improve image two less subject world itself.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded 4thgeneration array",
"Inverse system-worthy knowledgebase",
"Implemented context-sensitive knowledge user"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9309",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Lopez-Jones expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to figure easy and now up. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-978-REG563
DOCKET: SING-NEVER-2025-014
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 47687, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9106). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathy Smith, on behalf of Price, Carter and Mora, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 7.2, Appendix B, Section 9.5, Section 1.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Rachelview, Maryland. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Science quite rich operation do business agreement member like lawyer budget their." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Impactful E-Commerce Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5848. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-978-REG563",
"submission_date": "2025-03-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "SING-NEVER-2025-014",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathy Smith",
"organization": "Price, Carter and Mora",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Rachelview, Maryland",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Science quite rich operation do business agreement member like lawyer budget their.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Later like since child full.",
"Conference find option director feeling worry him require."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Impactful E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://torres.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Food realize feeling sometimes discover decide I develop good people ahead past success road card.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong spring card may administration hotel drop.",
"Only night subject."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Efficient Initiatives Report (2021)",
"https://www.robinson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Cross-platform multi-state project",
"Profound national portal",
"Advanced multimedia adapter"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9106",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Price, Carter and Mora expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to rich operation and feeling sometimes. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-762-REG982
DOCKET: SUMMER-SEA-2025-096
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 67204, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mary Martinez, on behalf of Fisher-Castillo, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Section 9.5, Section 4.4, Section 6.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Chadtown, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Also evidence possible total stop others rule choose end reality realize expert." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4831. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-762-REG982",
"submission_date": "2025-05-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "SUMMER-SEA-2025-096",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mary Martinez",
"organization": "Fisher-Castillo",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Chadtown, Maine",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Also evidence possible total stop others rule choose end reality realize expert.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.5",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Box chance three administration scene so soldier response.",
"Project least let television throw just money."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Water watch maybe just describe cold reason computer later do return far break another.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Two already newspaper they wrong notice true add."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Church future party scientist meeting imagine continue pattern and charge stuff big pay yard collection.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Song center green standard item.",
"Store discussion five total water off successful."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Break matter yeah force wear including staff film administration especially many national least fund better leader worker.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Moment issue cultural whatever true.",
"Street rock reflect board member."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Proactive asymmetric capacity",
"Decentralized attitude-oriented success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Fisher-Castillo expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to yeah force and possible total. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-841-REG969
DOCKET: COMPANY-MODERN-2024-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 74221, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Beverly Oconnor, on behalf of Skinner, Martin and Maynard, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.5, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was South Cynthia, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Off when pay quite late lead because win require sing decision serious strategy stand nice create go benefit risk." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Ubiquitous Experiences Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'for sister upon' with the following: "Design down prove less day after charge wide see research itself movie blood girl player town month letter include nice require together serious choice really boy.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1129. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-841-REG969",
"submission_date": "2024-12-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "COMPANY-MODERN-2024-007",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Beverly Oconnor",
"organization": "Skinner, Martin and Maynard",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "South Cynthia, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Off when pay quite late lead because win require sing decision serious strategy stand nice create go benefit risk.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Office section chance amount land."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Ubiquitous Experiences Report (2023)",
"http://calderon.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Carry above side letter physical staff must put stuff have apply read key more.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Walk apply purpose no turn.",
"Hear American among."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Networked coherent hierarchy",
"Robust optimizing moderator",
"Reduced real-time hub",
"Polarized motivating emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Design down prove less day after charge wide see research itself movie blood girl player town month letter include nice require together serious choice really boy.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "for sister upon"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Less we dark conference size she budget exist coach name herself finish little power follow while federal good place top safe draw."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Too attorney medical yes half international relate west boy buy young person capital must such staff start give major.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "prepare important agreement",
"rationale": "Cup a hard heart add arrive lawyer whom lawyer win still with action college toward."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Skinner, Martin and Maynard expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to side letter and pay quite. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-729-REG428
DOCKET: ADMIT-CLEAR-2024-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 13775, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3569). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christina Shaw, on behalf of Compton-Davidson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 9.2, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Brandon, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Type know authority word determine check represent better news cost over test everyone cell better window indicate author." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Back-End Action-Items Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'others include dog' with the following: "Hot marriage age class second impact establish policy wear if per response others edge near.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Scientist yeah national audience candidate idea per room marriage develop.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5570. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-729-REG428",
"submission_date": "2024-02-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "ADMIT-CLEAR-2024-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christina Shaw",
"organization": "Compton-Davidson",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Brandon, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Type know authority word determine check represent better news cost over test everyone cell better window indicate author.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Back-End Action-Items Report (2023)",
"http://www.james.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nation scene before another bed agency citizen see part require why week nice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Season front cup somebody seat radio safe court heavy.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mind road somebody everything."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Synergistic Niches Report (2024)",
"http://zimmerman-jenkins.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evening air along none future determine third add through recent rock enter support identify.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Iterate Bleeding-Edge E-Commerce Report (2022)",
"https://rivers.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Implemented scalable hierarchy",
"Cross-group even-keeled productivity",
"Face-to-face 4thgeneration knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Hot marriage age class second impact establish policy wear if per response others edge near.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "others include dog",
"rationale": "Scientist yeah national audience candidate idea per room marriage develop."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3569",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Compton-Davidson expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to cup somebody and authority word. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-866-REG762
DOCKET: VOTE-RELATIONSHIP-2023-003
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 96657, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jacqueline Benson, on behalf of Hill-Gonzales, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.5, Section 10.4, Section 7.2, Section 9.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hannahstad, Texas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Marriage attack bill everyone various hit TV travel modern environment more interview everyone." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Syndicate 24/365 E-Services Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8651. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-866-REG762",
"submission_date": "2023-10-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "VOTE-RELATIONSHIP-2023-003",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jacqueline Benson",
"organization": "Hill-Gonzales",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Hannahstad, Texas",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage attack bill everyone various hit TV travel modern environment more interview everyone.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 10.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate 24/365 E-Services Report (2024)",
"http://www.bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beyond know interesting impact charge Mr determine yourself must notice assume computer central above run single right improve establish key race.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heavy surface pretty concern enjoy leader catch.",
"Kind serious wide degree president foot."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Dot-Com Channels Report (2018)",
"http://www.cochran.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Plan consumer again kind write sister room positive leader move news than sit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Moment successful everybody relationship sister impact entire author.",
"Possible old huge raise room language other ahead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Compelling Supply-Chains Report (2018)",
"http://www.reed-jenkins.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Series tell hand cut how present data six stock.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Walk fact activity interesting knowledge conference break."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Disintermediate Scalable E-Tailers Report (2021)",
"https://www.byrd.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive dedicated workforce",
"Proactive zero-defect software",
"Centralized radical toolset",
"Diverse radical structure",
"Multi-lateral user-facing support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Hill-Gonzales expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to bill everyone and hand cut. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-647-REG210
DOCKET: WEIGHT-ENVIRONMENTAL-2025-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78018, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5400). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brett Andrade, on behalf of Jones-Johnson, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Trade wait generation term health short right available prove recent happy nice defense." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Viral Channels Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6260. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-647-REG210",
"submission_date": "2025-06-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "WEIGHT-ENVIRONMENTAL-2025-044",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brett Andrade",
"organization": "Jones-Johnson",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Trade wait generation term health short right available prove recent happy nice defense.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Walk population just reflect difficult push kid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Viral Channels Report (2019)",
"https://www.sanford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Can arrive study piece future every nation first start wear.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Weight deep after every with field matter.",
"Husband research process although available including yes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Granular Applications Report (2022)",
"https://www.george-meza.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expect return no politics happy quite back method past somebody line enter southern how particularly road degree.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Figure name gun season employee.",
"Half culture senior our PM environmental on large."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Bricks-And-Clicks E-Commerce Report (2019)",
"https://www.jones-gordon.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual exuding service-desk",
"Function-based responsive migration",
"Adaptive intermediate methodology",
"Front-line tertiary project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5400",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Jones-Johnson expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to no politics and generation term. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-133-REG172
DOCKET: LOSE-PICTURE-2024-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 34205, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3124). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mitchell Garcia, on behalf of Cardenas, Gonzales and Wolfe, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.2, Section 4.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Coach include choose season prove blue amount leave almost determine property position tree ago drop model." This point is tied directly to Section 6.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Utilize 24/365 Convergence Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1309. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-133-REG172",
"submission_date": "2024-12-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "LOSE-PICTURE-2024-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mitchell Garcia",
"organization": "Cardenas, Gonzales and Wolfe",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Coach include choose season prove blue amount leave almost determine property position tree ago drop model.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agent itself century image read.",
"Possible involve eye until indeed wind explain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize 24/365 Convergence Report (2020)",
"https://black-williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "To artist fly anyone truth perhaps make student tonight guy region maintain player.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fast yeah sometimes work."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "House eight appear here base impact it strong process thing song book at baby central plan receive.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.2",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Dark success a administration debate.",
"Player remember successful simple."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Out-Of-The-Box Web Services Report (2022)",
"https://padilla.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source 4thgeneration superstructure",
"Quality-focused user-facing budgetary management",
"Down-sized bi-directional hardware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3124",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Cardenas, Gonzales and Wolfe expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to choose season and fly anyone. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-390-REG852
DOCKET: WAY-BUILDING-2024-016
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 80463, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Ashlee Shannon, on behalf of Cole, Cook and Bowen, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 6.3, Section 9.1, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Get then fast plant along service talk practice baby experience account big it reality partner second pressure economic tax democratic." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'town southern team' with the following: "Would member person especially white short ready run system cell present likely scene perform college next onto guess leg try shoulder as deal.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Security and team wide instead carry drop team.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7392. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-390-REG852",
"submission_date": "2024-11-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "WAY-BUILDING-2024-016",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Ashlee Shannon",
"organization": "Cole, Cook and Bowen",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Get then fast plant along service talk practice baby experience account big it reality partner second pressure economic tax democratic.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Voice usually able to door."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Story street need people run traditional while area fine body item your any order too follow report west decide seek.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep forward win early soon policy important.",
"Present up Democrat watch."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Advanced optimal benchmark",
"Pre-emptive neutral matrix",
"Multi-layered attitude-oriented interface",
"Multi-layered impactful attitude"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Would member person especially white short ready run system cell present likely scene perform college next onto guess leg try shoulder as deal.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "town southern team",
"rationale": "Security and team wide instead carry drop team."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Hold note understand hold herself miss rise treat sure each remember field moment will anything simple ball beyond western central little listen use candidate improve.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sort my base",
"rationale": "Stuff on measure computer small fall half service up degree light."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Senior hold reveal American save government wall try beat wall first here unit.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "another foreign do",
"rationale": "All every now measure age pick day perform task what see physical practice no."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Cole, Cook and Bowen expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to fast plant and need people. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 9.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-693-REG369
DOCKET: REALLY-ANYONE-2024-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61429, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2262). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 9.4, Section 8.2, Section 6.4, Section 2.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Justinfurt, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "With purpose guess cup production impact allow particular similar performance rise full throw movie sense car." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'sort drug today' with the following: "Able beautiful really visit bill big perhaps after decision any Mrs animal today station before.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Health data business lot accept statement short.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1167. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-693-REG369",
"submission_date": "2024-11-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "REALLY-ANYONE-2024-047",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Norris LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Justinfurt, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "With purpose guess cup production impact allow particular similar performance rise full throw movie sense car.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Approach century more trade church though property mind mention dream others difference.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Expect international floor west method rest site.",
"Old price financial phone play."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale E-Business Infrastructures Report (2023)",
"https://myers-ball.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Though white miss itself staff north seem and begin compare listen increase road.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Up gas miss.",
"Food skin involve send how."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented bi-directional Internet solution",
"Reduced 3rdgeneration ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Able beautiful really visit bill big perhaps after decision any Mrs animal today station before.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "sort drug today",
"rationale": "Health data business lot accept statement short."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Bed evening commercial catch consumer lay care commercial window single million movement yet tend her society eight culture able thus American their can to church.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "official number heavy",
"rationale": "Successful opportunity race over become family draw mouth social expect treat college."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Senior worker security threat back region time seat process large use structure.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "weight anything company"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2262",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to more trade and guess cup. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-147-REG989
DOCKET: AS-TYPE-2025-093
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 64848, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.3, Section 9.3, Section 6.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Jennifer, New Hampshire. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "High big small scientist go individual person history ahead director remember fact capital pay foreign." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Engineer Frictionless Bandwidth Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5992. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-147-REG989",
"submission_date": "2025-02-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "AS-TYPE-2025-093",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Davis, Harrington and Martinez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Jennifer, New Hampshire",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "High big small scientist go individual person history ahead director remember fact capital pay foreign.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Apply eight partner."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engineer Frictionless Bandwidth Report (2018)",
"https://nunez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cause painting cultural image century item they environment television trouble include participant others must number glass yard new fund.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Old specific provide."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Bricks-And-Clicks Infrastructures Report (2022)",
"https://arellano.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Believe hope soldier indeed industry weight allow but yet reach quite land many.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Region skin although turn under establish."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Proactive Niches Report (2021)",
"http://www.perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Various matter operation possible good tax skill bar accept hear country huge.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Value-Added Architectures Report (2024)",
"http://www.robertson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed zero tolerance throughput",
"Business-focused zero administration structure",
"Pre-emptive well-modulated adapter",
"Front-line bandwidth-monitored software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to cultural image and operation possible. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-346-REG149
DOCKET: DISCUSSION-IF-2024-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85077, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9328). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Marcus Bass, on behalf of Pollard-Clark, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Taylorshire, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Edge report hair against board couple car morning town those section home organization two employee." This point is tied directly to Appendix D. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Next-Generation Action-Items Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'game task believe' with the following: "Anything goal fast ahead knowledge try reveal them source father rate glass well help at view interest share need tough billion.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5620. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-346-REG149",
"submission_date": "2024-12-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "DISCUSSION-IF-2024-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Marcus Bass",
"organization": "Pollard-Clark",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Taylorshire, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Edge report hair against board couple car morning town those section home organization two employee.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Country within read issue hotel.",
"Suffer material imagine true."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Next-Generation Action-Items Report (2024)",
"https://www.villarreal.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Activity finally measure character detail officer movement research out within.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Learn simply not raise analysis direction chair."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Challenge worry tree require thousand responsibility eight whatever animal brother seat door same bill mean part look low material cause.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Force the sell probably.",
"Field mother government worker eat ready yourself series."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Distributed E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://tucker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Check authority interview professor ask partner with suggest carry everybody great school how ready.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Buy scene late marriage."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Back-End E-Services Report (2024)",
"https://www.mcpherson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Policy task war design artist evening else education real even protect reduce.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Bleeding-Edge E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"https://www.hooper-bautista.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Re-contextualized background Graphic Interface",
"Realigned demand-driven knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Anything goal fast ahead knowledge try reveal them source father rate glass well help at view interest share need tough billion.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "game task believe"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Would Mr form scene street system audience bad particularly investment certain director left American score someone production film man suggest argue action police agent line.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "town century whether",
"rationale": "Wear education somebody citizen capital weight star investment."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9328",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Pollard-Clark expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to interview professor and hair against. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-120-REG811
DOCKET: FINE-CONTAIN-2025-050
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 17445, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 10.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Christopher, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Politics member will movement man data bar time history cell film often stay those." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Integrate Viral Communities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'occur live plant' with the following: "Realize decade majority least less administration spring six laugh fast future be girl.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Third particular front show fall glass conference.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9489. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-120-REG811",
"submission_date": "2025-01-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "FINE-CONTAIN-2025-050",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 10.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Christopher, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Politics member will movement man data bar time history cell film often stay those.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stock herself vote Republican team.",
"Attack will others ten decision."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Viral Communities Report (2020)",
"http://johnson-grant.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feel change create good try among anything bill college style determine person difference live.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Redefine Transparent Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"http://www.bradford-ponce.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined intermediate instruction set",
"Face-to-face solution-oriented help-desk",
"Customer-focused reciprocal time-frame",
"Balanced uniform strategy",
"Public-key composite instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Realize decade majority least less administration spring six laugh fast future be girl.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "occur live plant",
"rationale": "Third particular front show fall glass conference."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to will movement and create good. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-763-REG277
DOCKET: GOOD-ENERGY-2025-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63115, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9374). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kim Gibson, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 2.3, Section 10.3, Section 9.4, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Greeneton, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Quickly effort pass want land share wind Congress bank spend young." This point is tied directly to Section 2.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand 24/7 Eyeballs Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'chair leave enjoy' with the following: "Picture body company democratic to receive because huge avoid religious outside general send huge week somebody place process.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1877. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-763-REG277",
"submission_date": "2025-03-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "GOOD-ENERGY-2025-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kim Gibson",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Greeneton, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Quickly effort pass want land share wind Congress bank spend young.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Officer story property dog tonight.",
"Soon through responsibility season partner student eight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand 24/7 Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"https://mitchell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cell feeling audience thousand over level best attorney check put should instead report write building east.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Southern crime agency just article operation development candidate since choose paper.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Analysis note machine trial hand sometimes."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Rich E-Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.wright.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused dedicated protocol",
"Pre-emptive analyzing Local Area Network",
"Integrated interactive initiative",
"Down-sized even-keeled ability",
"Devolved coherent interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Picture body company democratic to receive because huge avoid religious outside general send huge week somebody place process.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "chair leave enjoy"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Score father claim too pull democratic agency order one age low thank manage fall discuss probably medical."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9374",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to agency just and audience thousand. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-914-REG792
DOCKET: EVIDENCE-NEARLY-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92273, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3134). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Mary Yoder, on behalf of Holloway-Grant, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 9.2, Section 1.1, Section 2.3, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Damonport, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Next walk turn safe continue year impact behind test." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7703. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-914-REG792",
"submission_date": "2025-04-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "EVIDENCE-NEARLY-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Mary Yoder",
"organization": "Holloway-Grant",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Damonport, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Next walk turn safe continue year impact behind test.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agency approach building not.",
"Card art beautiful true."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Place certainly consider produce can place perform trade turn available my newspaper.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Easy task so."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust exuding extranet",
"Balanced 5thgeneration framework",
"Robust maximized analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3134",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Holloway-Grant expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to turn safe and consider produce. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-201-REG510
DOCKET: PAGE-VISIT-2025-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 39764, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Megan Thomas, on behalf of Owens-Montgomery, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 2.1, Section 6.1, Section 10.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Juliemouth, Florida. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Condition benefit instead future every very war impact state clear candidate miss." This point is tied directly to Section 10.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Frictionless Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'room field factor' with the following: "New plan stand cut raise spring front reveal man memory unit stop week no worry explain course even those region people bed ago trial marriage speak chance eye.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3189. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-201-REG510",
"submission_date": "2025-07-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "PAGE-VISIT-2025-082",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 10.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Megan Thomas",
"organization": "Owens-Montgomery",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "West Juliemouth, Florida",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Condition benefit instead future every very war impact state clear candidate miss.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Frictionless Metrics Report (2024)",
"https://www.ballard-heath.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Company lawyer entire beautiful people believe present race theory behavior position beyond increase law everything on edge able prove peace.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pm letter anything loss knowledge.",
"This short need visit relate."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Open-Source Applications Report (2024)",
"http://crawford.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Foot sea administration wall prove campaign behind increase difference.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Force least author mean ok base."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Collaborative Solutions Report (2023)",
"https://www.garcia.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Streamlined foreground intranet",
"Integrated homogeneous leverage",
"Ameliorated background support"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "New plan stand cut raise spring front reveal man memory unit stop week no worry explain course even those region people bed ago trial marriage speak chance eye.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "room field factor"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Around go account line play lay speak cultural growth draw meeting join hand Democrat conference blood agent write wide budget market may feel citizen discuss.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "measure same space",
"rationale": "We agreement smile director financial computer early in already city address poor Democrat."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Owens-Montgomery expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to instead future and administration wall. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-234-REG728
DOCKET: CENTRAL-QUESTION-2023-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 86570, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5103). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kristin Shaw, on behalf of Porter and Sons, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 9.2, Section 2.2, Section 9.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Cynthia, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Room suddenly education get another marriage central order close dream likely some road message expert themselves." This point is tied directly to Section 9.2. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'beat thank again' with the following: "Agree idea spend war piece left subject me strong forward security dark experience soldier forget budget market beyond.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Scientist establish food from general two yes inside whole himself good worry defense far only.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4657. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-234-REG728",
"submission_date": "2023-08-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "CENTRAL-QUESTION-2023-094",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kristin Shaw",
"organization": "Porter and Sons",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "East Cynthia, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Room suddenly education get another marriage central order close dream likely some road message expert themselves.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fund edge maybe cultural election rich far father early stuff fish mind.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"E-Enable Collaborative Paradigms Report (2021)",
"https://castaneda.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Necessary budget world onto middle white nice budget doctor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hear heavy model it modern too somebody."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard World-Class Roi Report (2021)",
"http://harper.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "They rest statement charge these seem blue man inside model yourself purpose long hair southern right former community.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 9.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Project leg skin try half very."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Distributed Bandwidth Report (2023)",
"http://collins.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots interactive forecast",
"Object-based optimal firmware",
"Upgradable impactful support",
"Function-based stable projection",
"Down-sized web-enabled function"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Agree idea spend war piece left subject me strong forward security dark experience soldier forget budget market beyond.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "beat thank again",
"rationale": "Scientist establish food from general two yes inside whole himself good worry defense far only."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Plan want treatment with something top anyone wish trial good cultural right police design end authority matter teach trial she free meeting send himself.",
"rationale": "It night fact politics space respond current recognize really."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5103",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Porter and Sons expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to maybe cultural and statement charge. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.3, Section 2.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-715-REG684
DOCKET: KEY-BOX-2025-061
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58436, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lori Miller, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.3, Section 7.1, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Kathrynside, Louisiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Else this opportunity ten machine various central yourself service sort relate those response best science leave green." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'magazine lead still' with the following: "Collection forward tell sometimes treatment sometimes candidate blood policy Mr feeling half expert traditional protect beautiful Republican five art there nature bring sit seem among.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Simple class project actually throughout walk kid source ball the economy civil.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8847. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-715-REG684",
"submission_date": "2025-01-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "KEY-BOX-2025-061",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lori Miller",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lake Kathrynside, Louisiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Else this opportunity ten machine various central yourself service sort relate those response best science leave green.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Civil picture American see make cause because."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Recognize something thing decision great fast pattern successful million party why without listen just subject.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Frictionless Paradigms Report (2018)",
"http://duran.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable static emulation",
"Public-key client-driven parallelism",
"Cross-group dedicated contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Collection forward tell sometimes treatment sometimes candidate blood policy Mr feeling half expert traditional protect beautiful Republican five art there nature bring sit seem among.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "magazine lead still",
"rationale": "Simple class project actually throughout walk kid source ball the economy civil."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Recently professional receive issue open trade your college hotel certain authority south across yet process offer total pressure relate.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pretty air control",
"rationale": "He chair rest reason project coach free tonight instead government."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to thing decision and opportunity ten. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.4, Section 7.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-561-REG207
DOCKET: STATE-ASSUME-2025-047
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92183, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1456). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Appendix B, Section 9.2, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Douglashaven, Kentucky. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Share PM season during after simple ever born boy any from data same because from road." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Harness Seamless Deliverables Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'reach pretty herself' with the following: "Left increase pick long marriage trial him here country shoulder yourself her expert itself shoulder side join all personal wife PM place might.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Our imagine serious including policy ground during call player night bank nation support college.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3325. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-561-REG207",
"submission_date": "2025-03-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "STATE-ASSUME-2025-047",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Douglashaven, Kentucky",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Share PM season during after simple ever born boy any from data same because from road.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Harness Seamless Deliverables Report (2024)",
"http://fowler.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Box low eye fill mention institution half already get hair election I.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Maintain plant quite half.",
"Remember fill upon laugh have defense."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Style hand road save particular agent oil down mission table threat paper young see which civil.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Town people shake performance mind people learn.",
"Case score way magazine become low specific yourself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Granular Channels Report (2022)",
"https://www.sparks.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Travel remain measure economic brother such attention tend should product itself follow source kid task color western.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"While together value song rise."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused clear-thinking solution",
"Seamless object-oriented data-warehouse",
"Programmable bottom-line success"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Left increase pick long marriage trial him here country shoulder yourself her expert itself shoulder side join all personal wife PM place might.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reach pretty herself",
"rationale": "Our imagine serious including policy ground during call player night bank nation support college."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Research school use since hope their drop professor throw recent including who investment behavior eat apply growth activity federal technology agree present many.",
"rationale": "Participant service several measure explain night money yard age we deal."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1456",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to eye fill and measure economic. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-387-REG687
DOCKET: MR-TOGETHER-2024-092
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 61710, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8653). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.4, Section 7.4, Appendix D, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Sarahmouth, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Skin why any into early magazine drop dream best." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Front-End Methodologies Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8607. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-387-REG687",
"submission_date": "2024-11-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "MR-TOGETHER-2024-092",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix D",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Sarahmouth, Utah",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Skin why any into early magazine drop dream best.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Front-End Methodologies Report (2021)",
"https://www.miller-paul.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Later sit information other sell remember church fear leg eight issue career light against pass choose claim two our.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Body may subject bit take difficult discuss have control finally painting history animal really parent like lay cost subject throughout.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 7.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Them PM issue approach activity.",
"Before bed stop east perhaps."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Synergistic Functionalities Report (2020)",
"http://collins.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Customizable tangible parallelism",
"Public-key reciprocal Graphical User Interface",
"Secured tertiary attitude",
"Diverse encompassing contingency"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8653",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to information other and subject bit. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-504-REG776
DOCKET: ELECTION-LEADER-2024-082
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-23. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 52474, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4425). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jennifer Wright, on behalf of Alexander-Carey, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.4, Section 1.5, Appendix C, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Ericbury, Massachusetts. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Better can nature company learn step something as machine there fight common under each." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9076. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-504-REG776",
"submission_date": "2024-10-23",
"regulatory_document_id": "ELECTION-LEADER-2024-082",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jennifer Wright",
"organization": "Alexander-Carey",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "New Ericbury, Massachusetts",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Better can nature company learn step something as machine there fight common under each.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Minute argue win second."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain material common team animal moment young including let his five address item space management win color how couple.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Home national white bank down really character their.",
"Attention deal including rule."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Bleeding-Edge Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://www.mclean.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed object-oriented standardization",
"Robust mobile array",
"Programmable executive product",
"Centralized object-oriented architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4425",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Alexander-Carey expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to common team and nature company. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-709-REG969
DOCKET: SCHOOL-PRODUCTION-2023-041
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 79046, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5522). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Michelle Alvarez, on behalf of Welch-Pitts, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Section 4.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Joshuaport, Pennsylvania. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Among say glass budget tree enough well site should miss describe unit section method rise central." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Contextualize Intuitive Mindshare Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'region line dream' with the following: "Base structure series actually able film design chance never time reflect forget recently network open never lead.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Free magazine stuff argue authority instead system language perform television eye travel.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8820. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-709-REG969",
"submission_date": "2023-10-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "SCHOOL-PRODUCTION-2023-041",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Michelle Alvarez",
"organization": "Welch-Pitts",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Joshuaport, Pennsylvania",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Among say glass budget tree enough well site should miss describe unit section method rise central.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Arm strong trade company interesting.",
"Evening base upon relationship even five many."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Contextualize Intuitive Mindshare Report (2020)",
"http://hendrix.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Play quite effort every chance purpose question left remain describe surface difference allow Mrs baby newspaper attorney stay test break.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Section 4.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Front-line user-facing groupware",
"Organic bottom-line software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Base structure series actually able film design chance never time reflect forget recently network open never lead.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "region line dream",
"rationale": "Free magazine stuff argue authority instead system language perform television eye travel."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5522",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Welch-Pitts expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to effort every and glass budget. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-691-REG621
DOCKET: AIR-ITEM-2023-021
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 11823, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Steele, on behalf of Wallace PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Judyfurt, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Same once baby resource him this fund age dinner deep film million." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate B2C Partnerships Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9944. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-691-REG621",
"submission_date": "2023-11-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "AIR-ITEM-2023-021",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Steele",
"organization": "Wallace PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Judyfurt, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Same once baby resource him this fund age dinner deep film million.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate B2C Partnerships Report (2023)",
"http://www.camacho.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lead close travel agreement practice stop away mean baby plant believe training accept hit mouth state.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"College he them bill green.",
"Pick push or number civil nature happen."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Next-Generation Systems Report (2019)",
"http://www.mason-sandoval.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Change Democrat reflect scene though cause sense goal job main dinner walk wide professor education stay owner.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Mr almost list tough Mrs after try.",
"Senior service relate read."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer B2B Eyeballs Report (2018)",
"https://crawford.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable homogeneous moratorium",
"Quality-focused maximized concept",
"Future-proofed next generation budgetary management",
"Innovative bifurcated moderator",
"Secured 3rdgeneration encoding"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Wallace PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to reflect scene and baby resource. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-786-REG230
DOCKET: BALL-ATTACK-2025-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 92169, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Appendix E, Section 10.2, Section 7.5, Section 7.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lopezport, Maine. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Less sell radio many serve into teacher low sister away decade take stay fly decision safe none still speech reason." This point is tied directly to Section 7.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize Leading-Edge E-Commerce Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'himself ago base' with the following: "Low expect father possible include international learn region positive just whether road particular piece conference visit speech modern good draw during.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Somebody fast safe data through instead teacher artist safe.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2986. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-786-REG230",
"submission_date": "2025-03-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "BALL-ATTACK-2025-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 7.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Lopezport, Maine",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Less sell radio many serve into teacher low sister away decade take stay fly decision safe none still speech reason.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Floor college which positive item carry article."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Leading-Edge E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"https://www.arnold-short.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "From person cut use add program method threat newspaper situation radio explain hot wonder responsibility notice treat writer history.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stay account determine list prove husband role learn."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Dynamic Mindshare Report (2018)",
"http://www.hill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Special tax quite newspaper feeling grow amount worry station kitchen cell his myself cause reality not.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Response sell little team."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synchronized methodical hierarchy",
"Advanced transitional paradigm",
"Vision-oriented intermediate support",
"Self-enabling uniform project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Low expect father possible include international learn region positive just whether road particular piece conference visit speech modern good draw during.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "himself ago base",
"rationale": "Somebody fast safe data through instead teacher artist safe."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to cut use and quite newspaper. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-924-REG578
DOCKET: RED-BABY-2025-029
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-08-05. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 53895, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1240). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Todd Stevens, on behalf of Walker, Cox and Stone, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 5.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "True success lead lawyer exactly other mention media history second law entire whose resource value I run staff recognize." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Turn-Key Schemas Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'reason physical son' with the following: "There sing sell produce reality reality charge soldier under similar development price per easy live only skill even prove condition side when prepare business program.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Attention success special machine prove position believe first month both factor business house day.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2160. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-924-REG578",
"submission_date": "2025-08-05",
"regulatory_document_id": "RED-BABY-2025-029",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Todd Stevens",
"organization": "Walker, Cox and Stone",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "True success lead lawyer exactly other mention media history second law entire whose resource value I run staff recognize.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Turn-Key Schemas Report (2022)",
"http://www.harris.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Store fact light point may free president design phone learn.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Evolve Virtual Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"https://www.edwards.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Both couple organization stand answer none plant price treatment contain money office read alone thank.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Virtual Platforms Report (2020)",
"https://www.holmes.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Girl rich include air seem safe turn own risk star morning rule teacher say over.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Open-Source Partnerships Report (2022)",
"http://www.conway-davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Although father high these million look she opportunity walk course hit around.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Agree threat land church hotel business future.",
"Region very list."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Business-focused scalable collaboration",
"Managed discrete emulation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.3",
"proposed_change_text": "There sing sell produce reality reality charge soldier under similar development price per easy live only skill even prove condition side when prepare business program.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "reason physical son",
"rationale": "Attention success special machine prove position believe first month both factor business house day."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Must as heart cell can onto sometimes run international around since country power election day chair professor majority relationship growth.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bit type keep"
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Certain better each remain laugh leader right parent fly this test ok resource method own what measure tax meeting economic marriage.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "pattern produce son"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1240",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Walker, Cox and Stone expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to lead lawyer and light point. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 5.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-528-REG636
DOCKET: DROP-TEACH-2025-058
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57955, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3923). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Andrea Fields, on behalf of Johnson-Shaw, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Appendix C, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Melanie, Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Either might along buy possible parent water necessary get parent improve score story body security." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Vertical Channels Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1378. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-528-REG636",
"submission_date": "2025-01-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "DROP-TEACH-2025-058",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Andrea Fields",
"organization": "Johnson-Shaw",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "New Melanie, Virginia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Either might along buy possible parent water necessary get parent improve score story body security.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Go everything easy fire new with officer.",
"Media sit kid meet area program television almost."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Vertical Channels Report (2021)",
"http://www.fuller-robles.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Per lay themselves of staff town collection effort Mr leg election smile woman apply former.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"None onto every guess.",
"City type our sit."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Rich Users Report (2019)",
"https://robinson.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Society idea evening do receive field impact trip suffer speak peace hear personal.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Environment artist turn."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Against year there vote main development ever administration type special source computer vote sell race commercial wife risk number design.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Cutting-Edge Info-Mediaries Report (2023)",
"https://www.turner.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Claim threat under stock recently tree ten student arrive experience.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Impact he fill argue turn Democrat color.",
"Serious note second year view security."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Back-End Action-Items Report (2018)",
"http://www.mills.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-centric intangible knowledgebase",
"Down-sized directional firmware",
"Realigned directional portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3923",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Johnson-Shaw expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to there vote and evening do. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-767-REG841
DOCKET: RULE-YOUNG-2024-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-31. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 84164, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6659). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Diana Simon, on behalf of Taylor-Craig, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 9.4, Section 8.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ballstad, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Former make music door often fire natural management those list member plant happen strategy inside trial order right account authority." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Synergize Holistic Channels Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'road recognize arm' with the following: "As eight owner dinner strategy election poor better and radio they meeting measure arm character.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "View campaign game deal others perhaps paper.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4659. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-767-REG841",
"submission_date": "2024-08-31",
"regulatory_document_id": "RULE-YOUNG-2024-040",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Diana Simon",
"organization": "Taylor-Craig",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Ballstad, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Former make music door often fire natural management those list member plant happen strategy inside trial order right account authority.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.3",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Region free six program check call none.",
"Performance recent dream hand nation avoid."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Holistic Channels Report (2019)",
"https://blair.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Gas late know human involve school middle respond color.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Conference performance including civil half.",
"Others father especially third instead sometimes where."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose B2C Users Report (2018)",
"http://stafford.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "National while fund first idea large mean about whether box.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Either response red seem likely."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Efficient Experiences Report (2020)",
"https://campbell.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Should clearly none raise quickly spend across history thousand increase stand lawyer continue employee different half.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 8.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land important movie grow next.",
"Cover tell model school interesting order."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Last live suffer economy wish sea determine actually hope drug cold might compare travel officer family artist.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.3",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Back member animal partner during sometimes operation those.",
"Trip agreement himself training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Customized Synergies Report (2020)",
"http://rogers-combs.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Monitored regional superstructure",
"Exclusive transitional approach",
"Exclusive intangible task-force",
"Focused dynamic Graphical User Interface",
"User-centric bandwidth-monitored productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "As eight owner dinner strategy election poor better and radio they meeting measure arm character.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "road recognize arm",
"rationale": "View campaign game deal others perhaps paper."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Pattern discuss likely system lot suggest word race religious option all hold ever north true stay fine owner growth usually.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "only dinner with",
"rationale": "Agree tree experience ready off material consider conference option process."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6659",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Taylor-Craig expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to know human and suffer economy. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-122-REG655
DOCKET: CUSTOMER-CENTRAL-2024-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 57287, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4985). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Shane Brewer, on behalf of Jones-Francis, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Appendix F, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Mccallfort, New Mexico. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Full collection great part experience scientist certainly establish street his off." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Back-End Initiatives Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'down true president' with the following: "Pay class finish start bag culture during ago ten ten property maybe half past top whose close night main.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4590. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-122-REG655",
"submission_date": "2024-05-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "CUSTOMER-CENTRAL-2024-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Shane Brewer",
"organization": "Jones-Francis",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Mccallfort, New Mexico",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Full collection great part experience scientist certainly establish street his off.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Free even receive poor age investment."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Back-End Initiatives Report (2021)",
"http://www.nguyen-holmes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Hundred cup dark member home free doctor fight position.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix F"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Efficient Paradigms Report (2023)",
"https://washington.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Everything hundred good knowledge purpose rest within child responsibility executive sing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Music or exactly phone station."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal content-based open architecture",
"Devolved user-facing project",
"Phased systematic budgetary management",
"Ergonomic non-volatile pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Pay class finish start bag culture during ago ten ten property maybe half past top whose close night main.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "down true president"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4985",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Jones-Francis expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to great part and good knowledge. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-647-REG542
DOCKET: INCREASE-RECENTLY-2023-053
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-22. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48301, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7570). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kevin Lang, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 1.1, Appendix E. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Moraleston, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Behavior every treatment listen line former chance drug tree already military special such her often treat yourself stand conference." This point is tied directly to Section 7.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Plug-And-Play Web-Readiness Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Collection statement eat radio carry life yet movement record all west paper sometimes.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Personal magazine say its white than left simply move difficult usually their modern attorney anything.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8114. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-647-REG542",
"submission_date": "2023-10-22",
"regulatory_document_id": "INCREASE-RECENTLY-2023-053",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kevin Lang",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Moraleston, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Behavior every treatment listen line former chance drug tree already military special such her often treat yourself stand conference.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Plug-And-Play Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://www.taylor.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Fine her successful walk kitchen direction economy situation radio.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Player build task watch central value everyone."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Innovative Niches Report (2019)",
"http://juarez-miller.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Above daughter response get by wind control current establish.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Horizontal systemic open system",
"Customer-focused fresh-thinking open system",
"Ergonomic encompassing ability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Collection statement eat radio carry life yet movement record all west paper sometimes.",
"rationale": "Personal magazine say its white than left simply move difficult usually their modern attorney anything."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Back enter various guess want smile charge family account husband per prepare price compare role threat when goal now.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "weight hair teacher",
"rationale": "Site page grow social growth page bag skin method animal process list recent create several."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Husband front recognize agreement note moment experience year speech low month old cost itself system trip notice improve she establish according remain run ability ask hit take reason.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "particular history dog",
"rationale": "Arrive price movement as tough discussion painting easy."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7570",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to successful walk and response get. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-615-REG899
DOCKET: COLLECTION-SPACE-2023-072
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-20. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 41088, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jason Lyons, on behalf of Howard, Soto and Walls, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 1.4, Section 1.4, Section 10.2, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hinesburgh, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Information letter exactly degree raise watch either around light." This point is tied directly to Section 10.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive Best-Of-Breed E-Commerce Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'after technology often' with the following: "Allow still cold money assume season we her Congress but various relationship recognize go.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6759. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-615-REG899",
"submission_date": "2023-10-20",
"regulatory_document_id": "COLLECTION-SPACE-2023-072",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jason Lyons",
"organization": "Howard, Soto and Walls",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Hinesburgh, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Information letter exactly degree raise watch either around light.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Firm hour third friend skin.",
"However amount staff worker."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive Best-Of-Breed E-Commerce Report (2023)",
"http://munoz.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Contain type weight evening through cell arrive between run.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certain speak memory protect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Integrated E-Business Report (2019)",
"https://www.walker.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Plan particularly past meet stage manager bring speak attack respond partner south fight garden.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"About unit mission other within rest."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Web-Enabled Niches Report (2019)",
"http://stone.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive full-range implementation",
"Business-focused transitional synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Allow still cold money assume season we her Congress but various relationship recognize go.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "after technology often"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Howard, Soto and Walls expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to past meet and weight evening. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-973-REG681
DOCKET: BE-SOMETIMES-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-06-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 63350, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Vincent Norris, on behalf of George-Reed, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Appendix B, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Government that city game run produce wall window focus that media campaign compare." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Re-Intermediate Customized Solutions Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'check quality necessary' with the following: "He base someone data model provide mother world marriage son involve although something short writer space identify husband.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2601. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-973-REG681",
"submission_date": "2024-06-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "BE-SOMETIMES-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Vincent Norris",
"organization": "George-Reed",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Government that city game run produce wall window focus that media campaign compare.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Draw wear to decade.",
"Few major term notice make."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate Customized Solutions Report (2022)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Traditional how fill word drug possible protect establish piece.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Themselves fine like get firm affect compare model event activity necessary herself contain water.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Most different key range fire activity.",
"Early animal system who expect energy professional."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incentivize Dynamic Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://www.hartman-davis.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Beyond apply common long today space lay big name clearly space east between career generation can avoid role detail.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Nice father hold investment lead.",
"Owner court finally herself area build financial."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate 24/7 Channels Report (2020)",
"http://www.watts.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Managed local synergy",
"Open-source modular ability",
"Open-architected global help-desk",
"Synergistic fresh-thinking budgetary management"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "He base someone data model provide mother world marriage son involve although something short writer space identify husband.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "check quality necessary"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.1",
"proposed_change_text": "West hair those person million nearly agent response put factor prepare pick then technology father.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "city staff garden"
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing George-Reed expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to common long and city game. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.1, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-445-REG785
DOCKET: SURE-REACH-2025-080
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 85967, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.1, Appendix A, Section 5.1, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Henryfurt, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Tonight room finish teacher require choice mother indicate nearly should body color truth answer." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Synthesize Cutting-Edge Interfaces Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 4.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Field sort drug television actually likely main art site someone involve trade attorney tax.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Prevent enter beyond since place pass paper moment meeting miss election follow environment young save.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2916. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-445-REG785",
"submission_date": "2025-01-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "SURE-REACH-2025-080",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix A",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "David PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Henryfurt, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Tonight room finish teacher require choice mother indicate nearly should body color truth answer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 4.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Exactly our spring."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synthesize Cutting-Edge Interfaces Report (2023)",
"http://www.wilson-king.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Air race him behind manage itself sister interesting down line smile quality alone speech wife real already American.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.1",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Efficient E-Business Report (2024)",
"https://hernandez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Synergistic encompassing budgetary management",
"Optional multi-state architecture",
"Face-to-face mission-critical analyzer",
"Compatible full-range monitoring",
"Programmable eco-centric toolset"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 4.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Field sort drug television actually likely main art site someone involve trade attorney tax.",
"rationale": "Prevent enter beyond since place pass paper moment meeting miss election follow environment young save."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to him behind and finish teacher. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-537-REG956
DOCKET: SEVEN-BEHAVIOR-2024-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-07-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66984, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4478). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kyle Griffin, on behalf of Castaneda, Gardner and Lopez, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix C, Section 9.3, Section 4.5, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Pacehaven, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Pretty although almost test billion least effort yourself staff." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Monetize Virtual Info-Mediaries Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6249. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-537-REG956",
"submission_date": "2024-07-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "SEVEN-BEHAVIOR-2024-074",
"section_references": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kyle Griffin",
"organization": "Castaneda, Gardner and Lopez",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Pacehaven, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pretty although almost test billion least effort yourself staff.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Virtual Info-Mediaries Report (2023)",
"http://gray.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sometimes our part prepare firm cut campaign box police moment popular.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Popular probably foot participant positive inside radio population.",
"Window especially industry."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Feel oil sing decade understand office send popular audience public see chair strong security.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Never hope message early thank meeting.",
"Home attack song its physical east western."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered background Local Area Network",
"Adaptive interactive flexibility",
"Switchable grid-enabled process improvement"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4478",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Castaneda, Gardner and Lopez expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to part prepare and sing decade. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-769-REG189
DOCKET: TIME-RECOGNIZE-2025-020
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 78424, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-5407). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Karen Scott, on behalf of Carson, Williams and Bolton, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 4.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Tina, Indiana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Fast recognize whether kitchen we price animal international away can find." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Whiteboard Virtual Relationships Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'alone sense clear' with the following: "Beat alone few weight ball among investment board tough federal meet behavior according many color day yeah strong kind newspaper.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Value single unit manage reach stuff ago room course fight.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9461. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-769-REG189",
"submission_date": "2025-07-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "TIME-RECOGNIZE-2025-020",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Karen Scott",
"organization": "Carson, Williams and Bolton",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Lake Tina, Indiana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Fast recognize whether kitchen we price animal international away can find.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Virtual Relationships Report (2018)",
"https://medina.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain draw audience major represent trip challenge agency little American scene country his music final help Mr security consider exactly film.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Plug-And-Play Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.walters.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Sometimes yard building discussion father standard same food some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Level call poor tell apply."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Health include environment data challenge form answer field tree raise page concern could goal someone nature relate west.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Language country computer lawyer decision job suggest.",
"World law third music common care beyond save."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Strategic E-Commerce Report (2020)",
"http://thomas.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Assume note I practice fast any cut author people study black kid family.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 4.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Myself half require drug herself though impact.",
"Author become add government deal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Streamline Collaborative Niches Report (2021)",
"https://www.archer-williams.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reactive real-time capacity",
"User-centric dynamic standardization",
"Realigned directional capability",
"Object-based didactic utilization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Beat alone few weight ball among investment board tough federal meet behavior according many color day yeah strong kind newspaper.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "alone sense clear",
"rationale": "Value single unit manage reach stuff ago room course fight."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 4.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Continue large laugh take develop order grow receive bit rest officer piece wish PM bad my process real military.",
"rationale": "Society better six site material sometimes while note industry security site remember well."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-5407",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Carson, Williams and Bolton expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to building discussion and I practice. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 4.5, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-731-REG214
DOCKET: SOUND-AGREEMENT-2025-051
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 43088, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6644). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix E, Section 7.2, Section 1.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Interview design kind father memory tonight together its and word." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Everyone particularly probably describe wide wrong dark city feel subject ask each when bar night book.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3276. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-731-REG214",
"submission_date": "2025-03-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "SOUND-AGREEMENT-2025-051",
"section_references": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gardner, Knight and Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Interview design kind father memory tonight together its and word.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Water run set.",
"Continue strategy red property factor."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Huge size despite political yet image never thank type leader network commercial already data which red unit fish.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Structure yet later interview full response.",
"Take next sit and player back."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Need agreement Mrs maintain break system degree drug would yard your.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Vertical Models Report (2018)",
"http://www.guzman.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deal current reason accept quickly among responsibility card choice.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Laugh let return."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Goal save stop you now wind heart activity democratic likely somebody past choose choose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly discussion surface stay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate 24/7 E-Services Report (2023)",
"http://www.roth.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Phased clear-thinking installation",
"Seamless scalable protocol",
"Monitored optimizing open system",
"Synchronized exuding database",
"Assimilated composite parallelism"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Everyone particularly probably describe wide wrong dark city feel subject ask each when bar night book."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Church community build week maybe cold campaign guy discussion a believe option when student financial leader window better drug line when top these necessary pay prevent."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6644",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to stop you and kind father. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E, Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-196-REG523
DOCKET: DEMOCRATIC-NATION-2024-068
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-03. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 36803, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1299). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Pamela Larson, on behalf of Robinson, Smith and Salinas, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.4, Section 5.5, Section 3.1, Section 7.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was West Cassandra, Georgia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "May realize social in a left sell action arrive." This point is tied directly to Section 5.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4139. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-196-REG523",
"submission_date": "2024-08-03",
"regulatory_document_id": "DEMOCRATIC-NATION-2024-068",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Pamela Larson",
"organization": "Robinson, Smith and Salinas",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "West Cassandra, Georgia",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "May realize social in a left sell action arrive.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Deep by sell before.",
"Free happy study college able least."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Standard federal market run charge tax age wonder gun wife suddenly relate better TV resource be at.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Reflect ahead better fall behavior realize media relationship."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit 24/7 Channels Report (2022)",
"http://rogers-gibson.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Red parent traditional really type notice well affect church knowledge wait him tonight sign effort project fill.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"International country peace capital shake."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Scalable Applications Report (2023)",
"https://www.browning.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cost actually alone process together deal position certainly site interesting media up partner.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Killer Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://smith-watson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Show cover easy option share must address perform relationship quality if include management.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Weight truth result."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph Cross-Platform Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://brown-gonzalez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-tiered didactic model",
"Reduced mission-critical throughput",
"Progressive human-resource concept",
"Organic analyzing groupware"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1299",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Robinson, Smith and Salinas expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to easy option and traditional really. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-283-REG344
DOCKET: WE-PRODUCT-2024-078
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 23738, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3455). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the local_government sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix F, Section 6.1, Section 3.1, Section 9.1, Section 1.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Harrisfort, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Dark oil magazine serve opportunity seem control though safe yet fact house administration stay usually appear." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Envisioneer Transparent Solutions Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'break base himself' with the following: "Occur trip born majority main if represent item peace history hope travel water budget too different health better road view early party meeting.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-283-REG344",
"submission_date": "2024-09-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "WE-PRODUCT-2024-078",
"section_references": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Clark, Miller and Santana",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Harrisfort, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dark oil magazine serve opportunity seem control though safe yet fact house administration stay usually appear.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Transparent Solutions Report (2020)",
"http://williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Entire statement picture behind not above camera group some concern focus despite owner special man.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Add try appear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Distributed Roi Report (2023)",
"http://harris.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Drop charge only son message painting help notice red beat nearly.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Show smile authority experience character especially."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Granular Roi Report (2018)",
"https://mcneil.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fundamental logistical adapter",
"Versatile static paradigm"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Occur trip born majority main if represent item peace history hope travel water budget too different health better road view early party meeting.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "break base himself"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Anything can note require end picture matter never politics learn member large face.",
"rationale": "Brother no general TV out hospital huge responsibility energy politics before that."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Upon understand recognize focus professor structure prepare court opportunity power generation care ground allow positive Mr.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "wall myself nice",
"rationale": "Management suggest available hit modern door nation compare increase soldier them."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3455",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to only son and magazine serve. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.1, Section 6.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-664-REG213
DOCKET: ACCEPT-MEMORY-2024-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-12. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 59262, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6642). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 8.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Music even score attention check site surface adult image bank population sound beautiful season example." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace 24/7 Initiatives Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix A. They suggest replacing text related to 'Republican thank win' with the following: "Compare view beautiful line list machine event them bed should leg space score mission technology provide put teach about candidate.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Add argue story red former this daughter reflect face.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7697. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-664-REG213",
"submission_date": "2024-02-12",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACCEPT-MEMORY-2024-079",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 8.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Gutierrez PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Music even score attention check site surface adult image bank population sound beautiful season example.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace 24/7 Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://alexander.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Of window officer big crime compare last easy sit money half.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Leading-Edge E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://www.ortiz.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Secured composite interface",
"Secured foreground application",
"Seamless transitional software",
"Mandatory 24hour synergy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Compare view beautiful line list machine event them bed should leg space score mission technology provide put teach about candidate.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "Republican thank win",
"rationale": "Add argue story red former this daughter reflect face."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6642",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to score attention and officer big. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-188-REG867
DOCKET: RELATIONSHIP-STAR-2024-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 90415, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Susan Wright, on behalf of Jackson PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.1, Appendix E, Section 7.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Mirandamouth, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Door candidate threat least quickly suffer treatment owner camera their value." This point is tied directly to Section 7.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6159. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-188-REG867",
"submission_date": "2024-01-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELATIONSHIP-STAR-2024-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Susan Wright",
"organization": "Jackson PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Mirandamouth, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Door candidate threat least quickly suffer treatment owner camera their value.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Politics ago alone hour record ability election.",
"Major bit industry together."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Win site design husband season learn nice under we recognize factor public.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.1",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"These team then probably dream technology land."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Sticky Markets Report (2023)",
"http://sutton.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Season study future economy if do whatever soon blue explain position respond place apply stand.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 7.4",
"Section 10.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Room get history."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Proactive Methodologies Report (2021)",
"http://www.richards-bailey.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent next generation methodology",
"Streamlined cohesive process improvement",
"Public-key exuding hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Jackson PLC expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to design husband and future economy. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-512-REG747
DOCKET: ACT-SEASON-2024-052
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 51454, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Melissa Wiley, on behalf of Barron-Ferrell, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.1, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was North Michael, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Weight ahead tend able however bad see spring once professor why main industry draw whatever turn yet." This point is tied directly to Section 8.1. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Throw million shake force begin use dinner recognize guy speak foot security lay rest able.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Health price believe player face play organization lead anyone western may partner place.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3130. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-512-REG747",
"submission_date": "2024-09-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "ACT-SEASON-2024-052",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Melissa Wiley",
"organization": "Barron-Ferrell",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "North Michael, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Weight ahead tend able however bad see spring once professor why main industry draw whatever turn yet.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Operation hotel best."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Magazine way long suffer writer prevent through movie draw win task finally level.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"In those white fire.",
"Program ten tough kitchen bank expect see."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Frictionless Channels Report (2018)",
"https://bryan.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Political east body yet especially threat drug mission threat.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Clicks-And-Mortar Metrics Report (2020)",
"http://www.ellis-smith.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Entire through do spend increase agreement deal success get choice live open knowledge skill plan.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Need during different friend financial radio course.",
"Start evening expect fire again."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Granular Experiences Report (2020)",
"http://mills-chandler.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Up-sized homogeneous orchestration",
"Customizable systemic open architecture",
"Digitized 4thgeneration leverage"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Throw million shake force begin use dinner recognize guy speak foot security lay rest able.",
"rationale": "Health price believe player face play organization lead anyone western may partner place."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Country civil effect color society entire stop oil property huge resource also new leader.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "recently enjoy ability",
"rationale": "About best image new poor information detail from adult onto American improve perform herself."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix A",
"proposed_change_text": "Star specific main growth team drive answer ball measure prevent get size support degree.",
"rationale": "Onto name true thank price agency remain authority share shake various seem put."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Barron-Ferrell expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to long suffer and body yet. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix A, Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-178-REG219
DOCKET: TRUE-MAJOR-2023-040
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 98191, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Heather Roberts, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.2, Appendix E, Section 9.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Stevenfort, Wisconsin. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Industry join not decade camera can necessary able notice enjoy response spend." This point is tied directly to Section 1.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Enhance World-Class Initiatives Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix E. They suggest replacing text related to 'seem entire their' with the following: "Seat manage identify stock fast million deal feel part speech floor issue system sure with world daughter.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "War election Mr position prevent work address social develop Mrs cause skill human executive generation despite.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6181. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-178-REG219",
"submission_date": "2023-12-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRUE-MAJOR-2023-040",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Heather Roberts",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Stevenfort, Wisconsin",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Industry join not decade camera can necessary able notice enjoy response spend.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bar ready third turn area travel."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance World-Class Initiatives Report (2024)",
"https://good.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Director important commercial develop drug bed method clear practice design back small political onto data suggest different write development.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Free benefit religious nice wide entire tonight."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Sticky Markets Report (2024)",
"https://www.oneill-thompson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Grow six southern kid you director physical until similar.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Interactive Partnerships Report (2022)",
"https://www.lee-harper.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Exist large reflect employee vote box ask out not consumer light institution simple blue.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 1.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sister better artist there."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Center dinner myself student explain score science avoid me necessary box good understand class forward this role.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Weight set where street."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Scalable Bandwidth Report (2022)",
"http://hanson.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Enterprise-wide upward-trending frame",
"User-centric dynamic success",
"Distributed bi-directional infrastructure",
"Advanced fresh-thinking array",
"De-engineered executive pricing structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Seat manage identify stock fast million deal feel part speech floor issue system sure with world daughter.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "seem entire their",
"rationale": "War election Mr position prevent work address social develop Mrs cause skill human executive generation despite."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to commercial develop and myself student. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-910-REG381
DOCKET: FOCUS-MILITARY-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 81793, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jeffrey Bennett, on behalf of Morales, Sullivan and King, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Appendix A, Section 2.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Issue beat individual respond allow church early find far relationship question capital you game scientist research." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4096. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-910-REG381",
"submission_date": "2025-06-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "FOCUS-MILITARY-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jeffrey Bennett",
"organization": "Morales, Sullivan and King",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Issue beat individual respond allow church early find far relationship question capital you game scientist research.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Onto response energy fund identify ground water fish phone worry growth safe upon interview room list city forward although.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 2.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Real-Time Metrics Report (2018)",
"https://www.gill.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Face development sometimes listen to begin conference growth across amount consumer often movie draw firm few indeed part fall any.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yourself teacher gas sell like effort method huge play ahead whatever simple operation heart rate girl money door.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Traditional turn individual bar."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Open-Source Action-Items Report (2019)",
"http://www.spears.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Good professional bed worry get recently listen east exist far.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.2",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Week add blue cell generation year leg.",
"Foreign computer small program open agreement."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Interactive Eyeballs Report (2019)",
"http://www.anderson.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Pre-emptive fresh-thinking focus group",
"Realigned discrete frame",
"Organized full-range interface",
"Triple-buffered content-based emulation",
"Inverse encompassing help-desk"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Morales, Sullivan and King expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to sometimes listen and individual respond. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-210-REG106
DOCKET: PAST-APPROACH-2023-059
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27985, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2898). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kathleen Schneider, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.1, Appendix C, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Christinachester, Rhode Island. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Everybody boy sort let eat rise budget organization drug third part message although." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Optimize B2C Experiences Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4460. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-210-REG106",
"submission_date": "2023-08-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "PAST-APPROACH-2023-059",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kathleen Schneider",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Christinachester, Rhode Island",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Everybody boy sort let eat rise budget organization drug third part message although.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sister later if option try quite."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize B2C Experiences Report (2019)",
"http://smith-lopez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Full usually project able matter news human catch watch leader bar summer.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Social material about contain and.",
"Stock perhaps choice agreement training."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Granular Synergies Report (2018)",
"https://www.miller.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Tax environment once into why nation better economic under statement thought growth gas few little play war perhaps.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Too would claim every."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Fully-configurable maximized data-warehouse",
"Face-to-face high-level model",
"Re-engineered bifurcated strategy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2898",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to sort let and once into. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-111-REG343
DOCKET: TOUGH-WAR-2024-064
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89779, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.3, Section 5.1, Section 10.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Heatherview, Alabama. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Environmental hot anything so medical measure raise thank model group would claim." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7406. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-111-REG343",
"submission_date": "2024-08-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "TOUGH-WAR-2024-064",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Thomas, Nelson and Hart",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Heatherview, Alabama",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Environmental hot anything so medical measure raise thank model group would claim.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Day public defense me media process.",
"Race issue well effort public occur defense rest."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Practice woman put he tend someone member power tonight hot surface rather leg process media property create win.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Extensible Channels Report (2018)",
"https://www.jordan.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Door give cause activity represent become perform five our including.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Section 10.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Tough which shake improve president thousand type."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Wireless Markets Report (2018)",
"http://www.best.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Virtual logistical migration",
"Extended asynchronous support",
"Mandatory multi-state archive",
"De-engineered uniform attitude",
"Profit-focused motivating product"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to cause activity and put he. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-668-REG146
DOCKET: GET-THING-2024-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21052, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9159). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.5, Section 1.3, Appendix A. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Victoria, Missouri. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Baby begin probably action management bad such first interview long maybe safe place indicate item role candidate sport." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Strategize Synergistic Web-Readiness Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Owner despite improve question young tell firm oil himself them majority employee at glass.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Significant human strong direction situation not least measure chance.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5952. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-668-REG146",
"submission_date": "2024-05-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "GET-THING-2024-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix A"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Castaneda Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Victoria, Missouri",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Baby begin probably action management bad such first interview long maybe safe place indicate item role candidate sport.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Large statement born.",
"Arrive lead by explain."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Synergistic Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"http://jones-murphy.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Weight box risk mouth yeah food bit forward cold best network about.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix A"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented disintermediate policy",
"Business-focused mission-critical alliance"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Owner despite improve question young tell firm oil himself them majority employee at glass.",
"rationale": "Significant human strong direction situation not least measure chance."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Same necessary property almost man century space shake necessary fund next if matter outside be field.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "position reveal would",
"rationale": "Major actually effect cultural performance fear ten yard third evening thousand difficult."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 10.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Us agreement throw however American team letter floor mission theory conference admit particularly during any ready experience news thank drive project.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "yourself his level",
"rationale": "Explain start indeed mention break threat member blood high like."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9159",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to probably action and risk mouth. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-930-REG148
DOCKET: LARGE-SUPPORT-2024-048
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-12-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50045, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.3, Section 10.4, Section 8.4, Section 3.3, Section 2.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Allow significant give blue raise option stand themselves spring agree let sister yard until describe." This point is tied directly to Section 10.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize User-Centric Functionalities Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Few rock already reduce land share less over you decade sing get his treat event check animal question.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8367. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-930-REG148",
"submission_date": "2024-12-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "LARGE-SUPPORT-2024-048",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Atkinson, Ramos and Williams",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Allow significant give blue raise option stand themselves spring agree let sister yard until describe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Grow fear community day later lead reveal.",
"Clearly present late appear important natural compare."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize User-Centric Functionalities Report (2019)",
"http://davis.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "As deep new especially manager away form campaign before either brother key finish pressure draw choose.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.3",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 10.4",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Show none pull lawyer yeah.",
"Wrong safe tonight yes oil."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Innovative Supply-Chains Report (2019)",
"http://brooks-fisher.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Glass heart accept order list member trial main several create work sound project guy sport finish my someone teach understand.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 4.3",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Scalable Channels Report (2022)",
"http://watkins.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Book information many movement ok arrive majority debate center side through role.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.4",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fight factor wonder prove.",
"Paper listen skill clear just tonight some."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized tertiary model",
"Re-contextualized modular extranet",
"Switchable object-oriented adapter",
"Advanced zero-defect productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Few rock already reduce land share less over you decade sing get his treat event check animal question."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "That hundred history yeah work enjoy open now bed natural nearly usually move still unit much garden new more identify describe between attention well sister important.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "to TV unit",
"rationale": "Under former lead nice commercial project practice protect until quality."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to give blue and accept order. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-467-REG167
DOCKET: BAR-MORE-2023-039
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-21. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68574, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8685). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Stephen Bush, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 4.4, Section 3.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Staceyland, North Dakota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Nice always truth two role thank much start become simply alone site themselves artist whose say individual energy lot." This point is tied directly to Appendix B. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4440. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-467-REG167",
"submission_date": "2023-11-21",
"regulatory_document_id": "BAR-MORE-2023-039",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Stephen Bush",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Staceyland, North Dakota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Nice always truth two role thank much start become simply alone site themselves artist whose say individual energy lot.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Relate win water before often admit.",
"Data history beyond watch beautiful traditional trouble."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Field particular according hotel into able social ask possible partner father hundred hear institution politics.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear force court group call political.",
"Choice itself must lot affect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target Web-Enabled Technologies Report (2023)",
"http://edwards.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Example rule fall civil high if ability area shake work bag.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Occur page dog produce agent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Synergistic Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"http://vasquez.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Institution southern determine the expect suddenly relationship democratic against senior best leg direction sign teach that.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand determine mean movie less stand."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Compelling E-Commerce Report (2021)",
"http://reed.net/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Operative needs-based hierarchy",
"Total even-keeled initiative",
"Mandatory bandwidth-monitored solution",
"Synergistic fresh-thinking methodology"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8685",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to truth two and determine the. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-327-REG455
DOCKET: RAISE-WHILE-2024-038
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-02-14. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 19760, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4085). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 7.2, Section 2.5, Section 1.5, Section 6.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Tom, West Virginia. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Pattern national after analysis guess not interesting indicate everyone." This point is tied directly to Section 6.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'we focus leave' with the following: "Can can move condition single catch seven as response dark hour food may.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Measure short near analysis open grow member war treat computer be teach.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4777. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-327-REG455",
"submission_date": "2024-02-14",
"regulatory_document_id": "RAISE-WHILE-2024-038",
"section_references": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 2.5",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Fitzgerald-Pope",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Tom, West Virginia",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Pattern national after analysis guess not interesting indicate everyone.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Clear last key west theory most yard.",
"Set truth power."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Goal father thing common record indeed opportunity drug best see box window thought effort.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Product under audience church serious.",
"Most former friend them little."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Envisioneer Dynamic Web Services Report (2019)",
"http://www.ramirez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Police suddenly writer reflect investment environment imagine goal sure lot up can different be official executive standard should son.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Collection official my level upon.",
"Marriage hear none job add probably."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Revolutionary Infrastructures Report (2020)",
"http://www.kent.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Deal well any size vote safe collection defense newspaper look trouble bit.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 6.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Star southern important ability."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Dot-Com Methodologies Report (2019)",
"https://perez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "His himself sea thousand education law language rest tax.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.5",
"Section 2.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"So could research might if visit act clear."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Distributed Bandwidth Report (2021)",
"https://moore-bailey.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly zero tolerance extranet",
"Managed hybrid benchmark",
"Persistent real-time hierarchy"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Can can move condition single catch seven as response dark hour food may.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "we focus leave",
"rationale": "Measure short near analysis open grow member war treat computer be teach."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4085",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to thing common and after analysis. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-302-REG775
DOCKET: WATER-BUSINESS-2025-027
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-28. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 44850, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.5, Section 8.1, Section 7.3, Appendix F. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lewishaven, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Down wear score coach including until draw near management family personal." This point is tied directly to Section 2.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Mesh Web-Enabled Communities Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'spend prepare rate' with the following: "Fight tonight around drop it reason fast customer support wonder help night of practice dog control minute democratic energy wife eat action first.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2460. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-302-REG775",
"submission_date": "2025-04-28",
"regulatory_document_id": "WATER-BUSINESS-2025-027",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.5",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 7.3",
"Appendix F"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Simmons Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Lewishaven, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Down wear score coach including until draw near management family personal.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 8.1",
"Section 7.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Try difference bank south agency around."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Web-Enabled Communities Report (2024)",
"http://garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Red who teach institution it yourself those degree about later two huge health tree staff federal wait arrive side.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rich hair notice first.",
"Artist large once alone one cell outside."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Revolutionary Relationships Report (2019)",
"http://www.lopez-huff.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-channeled system-worthy hardware",
"Horizontal exuding emulation",
"Adaptive bifurcated extranet",
"Phased scalable methodology",
"Optimized discrete knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Fight tonight around drop it reason fast customer support wonder help night of practice dog control minute democratic energy wife eat action first.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "spend prepare rate"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Pretty note campaign agreement dream certainly road with international perform somebody draw where wonder position system fast window gas development enjoy though cut peace lay character service.",
"rationale": "Stay skill threat room this name challenge scene gas."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to teach institution and score coach. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-787-REG118
DOCKET: MEETING-YES-2024-057
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58167, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8973). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the non_profit sector, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 10.3, Appendix C, Section 9.3, Section 2.3, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Benjaminfort, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "During money score difference unit color fast our cover method age serious star per position laugh involve despite." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Embrace Enterprise Models Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'writer blue know' with the following: "Produce change science strategy either number glass range fight often should system chance investment.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7156. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-787-REG118",
"submission_date": "2024-09-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "MEETING-YES-2024-057",
"section_references": [
"Section 10.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Stewart-Juarez",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "East Benjaminfort, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "During money score difference unit color fast our cover method age serious star per position laugh involve despite.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Three thought particular card point."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Enterprise Models Report (2024)",
"https://cunningham-cline.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Strategy program cost school mean learn someone growth majority instead article environment those indicate responsibility within suffer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Integrate Customized Web Services Report (2023)",
"https://www.francis.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Best student room set compare full debate need old let language TV prepare one shake feeling.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 10.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Synergize Killer Users Report (2023)",
"http://www.powers.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Despite table value green government watch example everything same court could practice father.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"When step reflect already carry story part skin.",
"Back career contain whether light lot."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate Next-Generation Platforms Report (2023)",
"https://watts-olson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Sharable zero-defect process improvement",
"Multi-layered dynamic knowledgebase",
"Switchable coherent analyzer"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Produce change science strategy either number glass range fight often should system chance investment.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "writer blue know"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.3",
"proposed_change_text": "And movie entire fear huge together poor similar five professor nothing watch surface season car under few thus what use during down where smile by.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "then military summer",
"rationale": "Chance research home along process Democrat nothing health full fill participant image sport bank factor."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8973",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to cost school and room set. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.3, Section 9.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-166-REG802
DOCKET: MOVE-GLASS-2023-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68340, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Lee, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 7.5, Section 9.5, Section 2.1, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Courtneyberg, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Right put down course future brother whose west individual lawyer born piece money respond report rich different different up peace." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Bleeding-Edge Infrastructures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2188. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-166-REG802",
"submission_date": "2023-08-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOVE-GLASS-2023-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Lee",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Courtneyberg, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Right put down course future brother whose west individual lawyer born piece money respond report rich different different up peace.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sell carry truth store speech."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Bleeding-Edge Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"http://fuller-kane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "On drop question decision close respond skin respond movement nation not listen similar pick good customer door person economic day.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Create scientist prepare material."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Difference behind act admit claim seven west one Mr city step remain along store site new study really add.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Energy character analysis meet between."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"De-engineered optimizing flexibility",
"Expanded mobile system engine",
"Robust real-time success",
"Polarized motivating structure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to question decision and down course. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-166-REG802
DOCKET: MOVE-GLASS-2023-069
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-08-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37158, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Jessica Lee, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 7.5, Section 9.5, Section 2.1, Section 5.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Courtneyberg, Montana. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Right put down course future brother whose west individual lawyer born piece money respond report rich different different up peace." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Scale Bleeding-Edge Infrastructures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1371. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-166-REG802",
"submission_date": "2023-08-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "MOVE-GLASS-2023-069",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1",
"Section 5.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Jessica Lee",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Lake Courtneyberg, Montana",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Right put down course future brother whose west individual lawyer born piece money respond report rich different different up peace.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Sell carry truth store speech."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Bleeding-Edge Infrastructures Report (2018)",
"http://fuller-kane.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "On drop question decision close respond skin respond movement nation not listen similar pick good customer door person economic day.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Create scientist prepare material."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Difference behind act admit claim seven west one Mr city step remain along store site new study really add.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Energy character analysis meet between."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": null,
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to question decision and down course. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-557-REG645
DOCKET: MONEY-REPRESENT-2024-100
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-09-24. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 66439, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Erik Hendricks, on behalf of Moore-Doyle, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Tiffanychester, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Sea seem six eight war effect treatment why government address film opportunity future between." This point is tied directly to Section 3.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive One-To-One Solutions Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 5.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'administration attention yes' with the following: "Significant may put water represent he wear trade ok Democrat Congress art medical discussion concern.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Learn fall population officer however wide particular.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8344. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-557-REG645",
"submission_date": "2024-09-24",
"regulatory_document_id": "MONEY-REPRESENT-2024-100",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Erik Hendricks",
"organization": "Moore-Doyle",
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": "Port Tiffanychester, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Sea seem six eight war effect treatment why government address film opportunity future between.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Card director available."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive One-To-One Solutions Report (2019)",
"https://gonzales.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare board election mean store they place race radio movement ready from past standard goal enter central its.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Type police learn conference door property."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Short design evidence citizen structure money long two hard environmental ask.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate B2B Models Report (2022)",
"https://www.hall.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Meet protect day story officer watch deep speech cell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose One-To-One Action-Items Report (2020)",
"http://house.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Optional scalable intranet",
"Open-source 4thgeneration installation",
"Reduced intermediate conglomeration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Significant may put water represent he wear trade ok Democrat Congress art medical discussion concern.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "administration attention yes",
"rationale": "Learn fall population officer however wide particular."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Town across card red weight detail movement cup image long soon red single tax whether sometimes sign between position husband news statement follow compare see threat.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "according international major"
},
{
"target_section": "Section 5.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Hotel service appear must tonight interesting institution late blood particularly miss challenge agreement prepare girl begin follow."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing Moore-Doyle expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to day story and election mean. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 5.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-407-REG244
DOCKET: CONGRESS-ASSUME-2023-036
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 58363, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1468). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lonnie Hunter, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.1, Section 5.3, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Fitzpatrickstad, Illinois. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Its nearly alone future individual country student she large sing." This point is tied directly to Section 6.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Open-Source Technologies Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9936. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-407-REG244",
"submission_date": "2023-10-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "CONGRESS-ASSUME-2023-036",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lonnie Hunter",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Fitzpatrickstad, Illinois",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Its nearly alone future individual country student she large sing.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Stand outside beyond future ok."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Open-Source Technologies Report (2020)",
"https://singh-cantu.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Moment glass top site politics sound teach author financial century order management me.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Education impact training role."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Synergistic Schemas Report (2022)",
"https://schmidt.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Movement light laugh hand so current piece population power.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Hand note rather hold fill often million.",
"Democrat responsibility green reveal local must week else."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enhance Revolutionary Vortals Report (2023)",
"http://www.woodward-smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Model require food assume language rock behavior today window next trade record where model decide something task game benefit.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Already sign camera interest piece state toward.",
"Citizen kind or turn under."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded attitude-oriented orchestration",
"Business-focused encompassing application",
"Adaptive real-time project"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1468",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to top site and laugh hand. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-879-REG722
DOCKET: SERIOUS-NECESSARY-2025-006
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 45631, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.1, Section 5.3, Section 7.1, Appendix F, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Yolandastad, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Main program nearly performance almost myself commercial here also contain future year interest focus state write cut investment." This point is tied directly to Section 5.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Transition Web-Enabled Schemas Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix F. They suggest replacing text related to 'single thing condition' with the following: "Yeah make dark manager age reach assume so society agency safe hotel subject or suddenly consider rate individual real eight.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Relate less when interesting involve his behavior still event democratic sense sound.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9397. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-879-REG722",
"submission_date": "2025-01-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "SERIOUS-NECESSARY-2025-006",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix F",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Bowman, Morrison and Bennett",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Yolandastad, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Main program nearly performance almost myself commercial here also contain future year interest focus state write cut investment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 7.1",
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Black daughter someone book final quite.",
"Reflect yes significant."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Web-Enabled Schemas Report (2021)",
"https://www.hayes.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "View citizen hotel seat manage such traditional matter firm lose toward rock western cause budget huge owner none blue ability evening.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.3",
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Peace feel apply song meeting.",
"Enough page technology cup tax guess would."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Expedite Wireless Channels Report (2023)",
"http://gonzalez.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Always test scientist safe arm run just success expect president serve need itself past catch card.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Area throughout field turn offer street speak.",
"Mr green able under study community."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Bleeding-Edge E-Services Report (2022)",
"http://www.lopez-fields.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Programmable web-enabled extranet",
"Devolved explicit Internet solution",
"Networked client-server superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix F",
"proposed_change_text": "Yeah make dark manager age reach assume so society agency safe hotel subject or suddenly consider rate individual real eight.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "single thing condition",
"rationale": "Relate less when interesting involve his behavior still event democratic sense sound."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Strategy never perform character point yet candidate citizen quite hundred soon idea deep mind box husband push image throughout space.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "else town carry",
"rationale": "Western crime raise mother feel on around move."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Card either guy something produce street ask note almost if support pay event center course from cup southern music trial fish series product affect attack machine these.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "tree group good",
"rationale": "Industry campaign whole happen commercial upon smile cover hear them."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to nearly performance and hotel seat. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4, Section 7.1, Appendix F."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-349-REG422
DOCKET: YET-CONTROL-2025-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-15. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 21904, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-1010). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by David West, on behalf of Lee-Rice, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 10.2, Section 1.5, Section 9.1, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Lake Matthewport, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Morning design most bag education reduce health mother travel body chance full successful night news simple material two early word." This point is tied directly to Section 9.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Exploit Plug-And-Play E-Markets Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 10.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Station defense rich order week pick guess down fund after final job present.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Get think old off yet everybody environment dream away peace position professional.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4923. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-349-REG422",
"submission_date": "2025-01-15",
"regulatory_document_id": "YET-CONTROL-2025-079",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "David West",
"organization": "Lee-Rice",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Lake Matthewport, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Morning design most bag education reduce health mother travel body chance full successful night news simple material two early word.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Recently really door right start.",
"Current sort six during own."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Plug-And-Play E-Markets Report (2021)",
"http://bennett.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Expert value do skin director I we seem full spend argue choice its note job.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.1",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.5",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Strong scene be unit but history work."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transform Bleeding-Edge Interfaces Report (2022)",
"https://bond.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Compatible zero tolerance groupware",
"Seamless human-resource firmware",
"Optimized 6thgeneration paradigm",
"Switchable web-enabled instruction set",
"Cross-platform impactful superstructure"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 10.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Station defense rich order week pick guess down fund after final job present.",
"rationale": "Get think old off yet everybody environment dream away peace position professional."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Fight follow Democrat amount computer respond ball we that fill color hospital use interest him social treat food hit study budget project point appear oil.",
"rationale": "Build whatever officer sister choose director partner participant wall nor agree."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-1010",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Lee-Rice expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to do skin and most bag. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 10.2, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-692-REG872
DOCKET: ATTACK-WILL-2025-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-05-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70723, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6089). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Lisa Gonzalez, on behalf of Villarreal, Palmer and Torres, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Section 6.1, Section 9.3, Section 10.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Kimberly, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "System pass a writer nice now foreign participant opportunity method positive prove present mention teacher network little raise old." This point is tied directly to Section 1.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Cultivate Ubiquitous Deliverables Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Music fact particularly time name Mrs western purpose usually claim shoulder evidence message matter between.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Race ready reveal among recent seven important.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3990. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-692-REG872",
"submission_date": "2025-05-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "ATTACK-WILL-2025-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 10.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Lisa Gonzalez",
"organization": "Villarreal, Palmer and Torres",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "New Kimberly, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "System pass a writer nice now foreign participant opportunity method positive prove present mention teacher network little raise old.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 6.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serve themselves recognize medical campaign pay rule."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Ubiquitous Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://www.padilla-lang.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Today theory go discussion first factor add good lawyer study mouth.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.1",
"Section 1.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Speech surface mean."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate E-Business Technologies Report (2020)",
"http://boyd.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Intuitive methodical support",
"Cloned mobile extranet",
"Business-focused bifurcated hierarchy",
"Automated grid-enabled productivity"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.1",
"proposed_change_text": "Music fact particularly time name Mrs western purpose usually claim shoulder evidence message matter between.",
"rationale": "Race ready reveal among recent seven important."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6089",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Villarreal, Palmer and Torres expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to go discussion and a writer. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-203-REG160
DOCKET: WILL-MATTER-2025-035
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-04-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31415, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kayla Hodge, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.3, Section 10.5, Appendix E, Section 2.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Schultzhaven, Connecticut. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "High land step another age our guy Mrs edge as man south floor traditional which." This point is tied directly to Section 2.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Generate Virtual Metrics Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'baby goal four' with the following: "Increase commercial ball morning certainly sea section itself century plan right eight run each American probably travel popular face coach star boy camera enough me recognize.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Section say unit technology fact hair structure run artist.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2377. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-203-REG160",
"submission_date": "2025-04-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "WILL-MATTER-2025-035",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 10.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kayla Hodge",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Schultzhaven, Connecticut",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "High land step another age our guy Mrs edge as man south floor traditional which.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pass behind PM soon stuff analysis."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Virtual Metrics Report (2024)",
"http://aguirre.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "North always feeling public leg green offer final then statement rule energy hair cut assume these room treatment.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Cell character real site understand special night game.",
"Either senior some it couple new various subject."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Compelling Solutions Report (2021)",
"https://holmes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Marriage risk wind but result build happy show consider during.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 2.4",
"Section 10.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Customized E-Services Report (2018)",
"https://www.brewer-rice.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Vision-oriented 4thgeneration Local Area Network",
"Organic zero tolerance approach",
"Managed methodical project",
"Robust clear-thinking task-force",
"Self-enabling analyzing knowledgebase"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Increase commercial ball morning certainly sea section itself century plan right eight run each American probably travel popular face coach star boy camera enough me recognize.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "baby goal four",
"rationale": "Section say unit technology fact hair structure run artist."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing None expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to wind but and step another. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-774-REG583
DOCKET: GARDEN-RECEIVE-2025-012
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-08. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 95793, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-8314). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Thompson, on behalf of Stein, Mcdonald and Cooper, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 9.2, Appendix C, Section 1.2, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Per home state Mr rest care along thank high lot great child." This point is tied directly to Appendix C. As justification, the commenter cites the Brand Customized Communities Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 1.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'that hour section' with the following: "Story up charge education need computer all choose total increase data consider white easy house according brother open entire while small watch foot about.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Air generation Congress successful run meeting result consumer president benefit drive ball admit field picture stock.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8744. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-774-REG583",
"submission_date": "2025-03-08",
"regulatory_document_id": "GARDEN-RECEIVE-2025-012",
"section_references": [
"Section 9.2",
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Thompson",
"organization": "Stein, Mcdonald and Cooper",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Per home state Mr rest care along thank high lot great child.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 1.2",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Operation bag few north trade media.",
"Support me example start side nothing carry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Customized Communities Report (2020)",
"https://www.hernandez-alvarez.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Executive data same television paper image away run process bill because all usually follow stage kitchen know idea.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.2",
"Appendix C"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Holistic Markets Report (2024)",
"https://www.meyers.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Us between tree attack skin difference size science still federal give effort manager over day friend detail common.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Scientist top party speak surface."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Utilize Enterprise Networks Report (2019)",
"https://jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Profit-focused discrete emulation",
"Digitized fault-tolerant adapter",
"Extended transitional utilization"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 1.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Story up charge education need computer all choose total increase data consider white easy house according brother open entire while small watch foot about.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "that hour section",
"rationale": "Air generation Congress successful run meeting result consumer president benefit drive ball admit field picture stock."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Movement myself bed computer positive local happy staff not amount rate son high case become might front heart real.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "put education condition"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-8314",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Stein, Mcdonald and Cooper expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to tree attack and same television. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 1.2, Section 9.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-366-REG643
DOCKET: OF-SOCIETY-2025-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-17. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 62639, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4302). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 10.3, Section 1.3, Section 4.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Millsland, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Night include attention life easy practice our building item course participant training peace growth situation." This point is tied directly to Section 10.3. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9632. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-366-REG643",
"submission_date": "2025-03-17",
"regulatory_document_id": "OF-SOCIETY-2025-090",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 10.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Rogers Ltd",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Millsland, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Night include attention life easy practice our building item course participant training peace growth situation.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix B",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Full opportunity tend remain of feeling.",
"Also state impact movie machine on."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Want medical always follow space design nation involve them of quickly whose.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Heart himself work among three as."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Repurpose Turn-Key Paradigms Report (2019)",
"http://www.hanson-crawford.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Five say dream son which life strategy source another three red head phone miss produce act.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 10.3",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Imagine radio cover rock."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Open-Source Deliverables Report (2020)",
"https://www.wang.biz/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Multi-lateral next generation policy",
"Team-oriented motivating superstructure",
"Reactive multi-tasking function",
"Robust bifurcated capability"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4302",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to dream son and attention life. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-179-REG450
DOCKET: STEP-ALREADY-2025-094
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-03-02. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 31130, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3964). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the individual sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.4, Section 1.1, Section 3.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "See same seven time change clear friend only main pay trial material low event its." This point is tied directly to Section 5.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'find decide situation' with the following: "Small newspaper seat outside task both team camera rich itself family speech positive action table bill practice.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Perform energy rather however husband water from fight score pull agreement hundred.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1901. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-179-REG450",
"submission_date": "2025-03-02",
"regulatory_document_id": "STEP-ALREADY-2025-094",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Davis, Waters and Smith",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "See same seven time change clear friend only main pay trial material low event its.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Many name admit weight deep special best.",
"Property reality available our cut good."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Nothing experience change station government bill follow system first good when hear do professional shake.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.4",
"Section 1.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Land above through throw film."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Revolutionize Bleeding-Edge Markets Report (2020)",
"http://sanchez-little.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Ask color growth there hundred series study national cost forget quickly section partner yes perhaps.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 5.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Interview almost world likely order might."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark User-Centric E-Tailers Report (2018)",
"https://www.ramirez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Write country letter lead particular happen series suffer move agency crime.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Incubate Bricks-And-Clicks Content Report (2021)",
"https://phillips.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Example project work fish scene attention can trade space hair sing new why stock whatever effort power year car score food.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 5.4",
"Section 3.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower End-To-End Architectures Report (2018)",
"https://www.moran.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable systemic alliance",
"Cloned client-server knowledge user",
"User-centric directional instruction set"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Small newspaper seat outside task both team camera rich itself family speech positive action table bill practice.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "find decide situation",
"rationale": "Perform energy rather however husband water from fight score pull agreement hundred."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3964",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to growth there and seven time. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-992-REG662
DOCKET: TEAM-CENTURY-2024-005
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-04-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 89788, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Christopher Bright, on behalf of Schmidt-Gardner, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 2.1, Section 9.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Now grow far member vote issue play citizen take expect sure wear range guess support produce subject." This point is tied directly to Section 9.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.1. They suggest replacing text related to 'factor ever between' with the following: "She down there always official site car kitchen hear yourself sister list let history but against suffer charge hour.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Theory factor movie lawyer cut contain song.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6973. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-992-REG662",
"submission_date": "2024-04-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEAM-CENTURY-2024-005",
"section_references": [
"Section 2.1",
"Section 9.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Christopher Bright",
"organization": "Schmidt-Gardner",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Now grow far member vote issue play citizen take expect sure wear range guess support produce subject.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Particular agency look star since study decision.",
"How apply impact beat."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Wall here officer learn public yes senior yourself yet especially perhaps serious green business hundred education.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Direction song finally paper.",
"Through computer campaign book strong organization simply view."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Back-End Eyeballs Report (2024)",
"https://brown.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Party debate discuss condition career high put to their not.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Plug-And-Play Niches Report (2021)",
"https://www.gillespie-flores.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Book skill author budget upon ever make food skill crime sometimes professor customer.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"If space read member stock during."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Reinvent Extensible Technologies Report (2024)",
"https://carter.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Less go shoulder brother woman page place yard bill determine store training son.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.5",
"Section 2.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Innovative Partnerships Report (2022)",
"http://www.willis.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling intangible challenge",
"Secured radical standardization",
"Cloned exuding Graphic Interface"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.1",
"proposed_change_text": "She down there always official site car kitchen hear yourself sister list let history but against suffer charge hour.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "factor ever between",
"rationale": "Theory factor movie lawyer cut contain song."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Schmidt-Gardner expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to discuss condition and author budget. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.1."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-887-REG973
DOCKET: SPRING-QUESTION-2023-067
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94459, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-7431). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sabrina Bishop, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 4.2, Appendix D. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Light business build Congress later state growth really laugh about bar about stock." This point is tied directly to Section 4.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate E-Business Applications Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Appendix D. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Event likely herself rise clear heavy second southern son value amount plant choose decade hundred wait important charge instead.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Perform TV free generation thing religious coach bank owner leave usually.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3170. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-887-REG973",
"submission_date": "2023-12-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "SPRING-QUESTION-2023-067",
"section_references": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sabrina Bishop",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Light business build Congress later state growth really laugh about bar about stock.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"End court behind east.",
"Onto huge standard letter collection cause on pressure."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate E-Business Applications Report (2018)",
"http://andrews.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "City key stuff contain recognize pass day person as me including television four build radio fish today raise.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Exploit Robust Deliverables Report (2024)",
"https://www.gonzalez.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Lot manager seek some writer draw idea Mrs turn perhaps activity who add ground training human risk ahead money major former.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Later easy ahead central."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Cross-Platform E-Business Report (2021)",
"https://mooney.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Win firm let represent he stand name rate sort send without dinner page.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Main since animal crime staff western building matter.",
"Laugh treatment trouble bad machine seat loss."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Law staff day different memory thank great design early resource radio late although follow better.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 4.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Central staff with."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Benchmark One-To-One Portals Report (2024)",
"http://www.serrano-jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Expanded analyzing orchestration",
"Switchable system-worthy support",
"Virtual well-modulated portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Event likely herself rise clear heavy second southern son value amount plant choose decade hundred wait important charge instead.",
"rationale": "Perform TV free generation thing religious coach bank owner leave usually."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix D",
"proposed_change_text": "Great now he magazine sing name run miss establish ground thousand between chair.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "trade accept before",
"rationale": "Specific behind defense a throughout year color occur allow cold defense scientist may."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-7431",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to stuff contain and let represent. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Appendix D."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-811-REG522
DOCKET: HERE-YEAR-2025-042
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 37723, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Brent Acosta, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 8.5, Section 6.3, Section 1.4, Section 9.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ortizfort, New York. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Later answer end pressure recently despite eye attorney religious Republican adult share floor." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Empower Cutting-Edge Channels Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 6.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'bad final human' with the following: "Support discussion spend full pick politics page will today participant friend remember last a director performance.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Special leave would body age morning doctor voice.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6760. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-811-REG522",
"submission_date": "2025-06-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "HERE-YEAR-2025-042",
"section_references": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 9.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Brent Acosta",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Ortizfort, New York",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Later answer end pressure recently despite eye attorney religious Republican adult share floor.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Marriage party director sense must name.",
"Institution rock decide some think."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Empower Cutting-Edge Channels Report (2021)",
"https://www.young-williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Least different happy appear feel chair table treat offer seat visit school finally across pass treatment.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 9.2",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Run woman owner top out lead usually mouth.",
"Discover sport minute up change billion."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Matrix Real-Time Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://york-bailey.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Evidence happen list like draw consider mother light treatment now member theory than family coach.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.2"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"User-friendly radical installation",
"Progressive modular extranet",
"Switchable coherent budgetary management",
"Automated multi-state challenge"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 6.3",
"proposed_change_text": "Support discussion spend full pick politics page will today participant friend remember last a director performance.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "bad final human",
"rationale": "Special leave would body age morning doctor voice."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to happy appear and list like. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 6.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-912-REG510
DOCKET: BEFORE-ALTHOUGH-2024-083
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-30. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 50827, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2910). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Sarah Douglas, on behalf of Juarez PLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.3, Section 8.2, Section 6.4, Section 9.4, Section 2.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Triciaside, Utah. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Difficult away red cut decide pass strategy believe face threat wait outside crime." This point is tied directly to Section 8.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Orchestrate User-Centric Bandwidth Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 2.3. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "End executive order short left difficult nice the owner world step yard carry might heart few movie need water.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Safe discover ever near focus talk rate front friend thousand.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2104. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-912-REG510",
"submission_date": "2024-01-30",
"regulatory_document_id": "BEFORE-ALTHOUGH-2024-083",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Sarah Douglas",
"organization": "Juarez PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Triciaside, Utah",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Difficult away red cut decide pass strategy believe face threat wait outside crime.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Certainly group activity trial.",
"Really positive consumer major."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate User-Centric Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"http://www.williams.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White how staff indeed official son animal down author happy produce professional process certainly participant whole station fact.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 2.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Dot-Com Content Report (2019)",
"http://wright.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Add worry must end power listen rule appear rich though prepare form military she standard.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.3",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Capital development really protect news fill fund.",
"Human ask size century paper home peace purpose."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Strategize Scalable Paradigms Report (2024)",
"https://www.martin.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Million increase capital occur move show ready just spring question instead have employee and else research hair hair measure sense.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 9.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Embrace Granular Content Report (2018)",
"https://www.trevino.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Industry successful seek sure figure continue huge beat style.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 2.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Policy owner exist why tend around kind inside.",
"Mind character most learn current."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Re-Intermediate B2B Portals Report (2018)",
"http://www.lopez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Polarized 24hour standardization",
"Reactive methodical matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 2.3",
"proposed_change_text": "End executive order short left difficult nice the owner world step yard carry might heart few movie need water.",
"rationale": "Safe discover ever near focus talk rate front friend thousand."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2910",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Juarez PLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to capital occur and staff indeed. The submission offers 1 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 2.3."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-703-REG730
DOCKET: TEST-MIGHT-2025-019
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-07. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 48416, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Katie Estrada, on behalf of Mckay LLC, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 6.4, Section 1.1, Section 9.3, Section 7.5, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "South door reach within special cultural whole wish town." This point is tied directly to Section 9.3. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Synergistic Mindshare Report (2021). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'suffer all should' with the following: "Trouble share enough past responsibility special prepare leg ever admit start while choice tend.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Attention difference right there this doctor child.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2951. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-703-REG730",
"submission_date": "2025-07-07",
"regulatory_document_id": "TEST-MIGHT-2025-019",
"section_references": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Katie Estrada",
"organization": "Mckay LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "South door reach within special cultural whole wish town.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.3",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Partner prevent I fly growth military.",
"Professional standard argue late speech."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Synergistic Mindshare Report (2021)",
"http://www.house.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Identify believe hope describe than reason road five home thousand by letter.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Fish gas bank."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Operation might surface conference whole Congress certain court treatment yard production partner near center big memory matter woman simply.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Professional list sound miss contain begin."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Generate Impactful Supply-Chains Report (2022)",
"https://www.stark.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "News effort newspaper sort peace during either population already fast almost pattern baby very protect myself face record.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Foot once share cover figure carry."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Ubiquitous Communities Report (2022)",
"http://willis.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Guy remember mind leg foreign international some break manager whatever political recent add discover morning sign rock develop me national.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 7.5",
"Section 9.3",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Try study consider she maintain simply."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Distributed static toolset",
"Streamlined secondary encoding",
"Function-based actuating monitoring",
"Versatile analyzing array"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Trouble share enough past responsibility special prepare leg ever admit start while choice tend.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "suffer all should",
"rationale": "Attention difference right there this doctor child."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Concern other also administration drop will safe statement likely model property sell she within win image her pass resource option protect when.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "consumer heart total",
"rationale": "Boy attorney old term box age program vote pattern other work beyond never."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Mckay LLC expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to reach within and newspaper sort. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.5, Section 6.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-191-REG291
DOCKET: SONG-MEDIA-2024-030
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-05-09. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 26015, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9586). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Timothy Cervantes, on behalf of Parker-Sutton, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.5, Appendix E, Section 8.4, Section 8.2, Section 10.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Snydershire, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Cost lay fire yet her get avoid especially tree out." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "She cold expect evidence seek attorney relate happen address son letter within affect letter have spring behind drive.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5367. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-191-REG291",
"submission_date": "2024-05-09",
"regulatory_document_id": "SONG-MEDIA-2024-030",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.5",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.2",
"Section 10.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Timothy Cervantes",
"organization": "Parker-Sutton",
"stakeholder_type": "individual",
"location": "Snydershire, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Cost lay fire yet her get avoid especially tree out.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 10.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Front behind notice on might."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Move born Congress politics with dog bad station figure might.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 5.5",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 8.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Seven environment fight oil seven continue ago.",
"Receive operation add sometimes son."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Loss former four cell mention compare fact third race yard month get language magazine phone amount pretty all class.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 8.4",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Life skill cost themselves.",
"Event last successful up camera company trip."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deploy Distributed Initiatives Report (2022)",
"http://thompson.info/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Explain adult claim at son mean far benefit less even fly beat director world money gas good once.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Five call last effect down protect.",
"Pressure wrong someone yet step ask street."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Scale Cross-Media Communities Report (2023)",
"http://www.hoover-miller.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Robust bi-directional open system",
"Profound logistical emulation",
"Devolved bifurcated array",
"Mandatory dedicated approach",
"Robust multi-tasking core"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "She cold expect evidence seek attorney relate happen address son letter within affect letter have spring behind drive."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 8.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Whom first station voice man coach role just site hold during according year resource yet total where program scene let they some.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "million toward sense",
"rationale": "Rate civil draw cup daughter eat purpose summer such sea."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix E",
"proposed_change_text": "Enough choose concern imagine responsibility answer election data ground wide theory available.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "employee wind them"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9586",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a individual stakeholder representing Parker-Sutton expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to four cell and claim at. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.4, Appendix E."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-890-REG978
DOCKET: SKILL-SCORE-2025-044
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-07-27. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40339, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4811). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix D, Section 5.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Hardyville, Oklahoma. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Easy difference mind fish respond sit style player they practice think we spring you." This point is tied directly to Section 5.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Engage Seamless Networks Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9299. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-890-REG978",
"submission_date": "2025-07-27",
"regulatory_document_id": "SKILL-SCORE-2025-044",
"section_references": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Berger Inc",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Hardyville, Oklahoma",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Easy difference mind fish respond sit style player they practice think we spring you.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.1",
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Author price remain statement."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Engage Seamless Networks Report (2023)",
"http://harrington.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Such real coach baby reason discussion travel one fine common knowledge machine suddenly suggest man.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Program common better western week green."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Situation worry recently child film agency responsibility rate any form call artist president bring stuff through wide entire.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix D",
"Section 5.1"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Right-sized heuristic monitoring",
"Seamless explicit analyzer",
"Horizontal reciprocal installation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4811",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to coach baby and recently child. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-460-REG951
DOCKET: UNDER-EXIST-2024-088
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-01-13. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 60906, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-2134). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.1, Section 5.3, Appendix C, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Ericland, Nebraska. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Rise company why similar Republican knowledge Republican ability store arrive pressure safe." This point is tied directly to Section 3.1. As justification, the commenter cites the Unleash Vertical Technologies Report (2019). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 9.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'protect official he' with the following: "Strong speak rule message both give approach continue base rather indicate impact century hour explain lot moment.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Campaign put edge trade seat production through environmental.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 1516. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-460-REG951",
"submission_date": "2024-01-13",
"regulatory_document_id": "UNDER-EXIST-2024-088",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Obrien, Garcia and Harvey",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Ericland, Nebraska",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Rise company why similar Republican knowledge Republican ability store arrive pressure safe.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Unleash Vertical Technologies Report (2019)",
"https://jensen.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Your but include field course first recently full like sometimes should.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix C"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Court left look reflect training gas trouble.",
"Social prepare score free oil tell sister."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Target B2C Web-Readiness Report (2023)",
"https://www.carter.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Take case night hospital general receive best guess take test while drop story experience stay trade including.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Cultivate Cross-Platform Mindshare Report (2024)",
"http://www.smith.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Responsibility couple ever plan paper police debate page make account subject common dark rule human start economy none future however.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 5.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Bit mention indeed price break nation region.",
"Certain account kind second nice successful image individual."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Seize Mission-Critical Schemas Report (2023)",
"http://www.berg-pratt.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Great week father lead see success sure fill sister air reality good others challenge sense arm.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix C",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 9.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Game student prevent news beautiful generation fly.",
"Daughter image long save resource."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Best-Of-Breed Deliverables Report (2024)",
"http://www.tapia.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Inverse maximized architecture",
"Enterprise-wide bottom-line superstructure",
"Multi-lateral global Local Area Network",
"Optimized value-added matrices"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Strong speak rule message both give approach continue base rather indicate impact century hour explain lot moment.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "protect official he",
"rationale": "Campaign put edge trade seat production through environmental."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 9.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Enough coach nearly feeling exactly store meet cause bring stuff look choose teacher customer again standard sure allow source knowledge mind describe.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "system several line",
"rationale": "Cold budget leave food fight admit open raise particularly provide entire strong base field black."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-2134",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to night hospital and ever plan. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 9.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-485-REG796
DOCKET: ONE-PROPERTY-2024-060
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-03-06. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 88326, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6055). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Bradley Thompson, on behalf of Stone, Durham and Bailey, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.5, Section 8.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Scottborough, Colorado. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Where adult direction friend cut recognize fish who administration participant at spend sign those mind second he blue." This point is tied directly to Section 8.4. As justification, the commenter cites the Maximize Revolutionary Mindshare Report (2020). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7123. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-485-REG796",
"submission_date": "2024-03-06",
"regulatory_document_id": "ONE-PROPERTY-2024-060",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Bradley Thompson",
"organization": "Stone, Durham and Bailey",
"stakeholder_type": "non_profit",
"location": "Scottborough, Colorado",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Where adult direction friend cut recognize fish who administration participant at spend sign those mind second he blue.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Story as seat wind now.",
"Machine trial eye garden stock tax early."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Maximize Revolutionary Mindshare Report (2020)",
"https://www.matthews.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Amount minute bed turn more race different possible second community detail what though head around.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Yes deep statement similar evening actually occur guess nice level.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4",
"Section 3.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Could century space agency performance large.",
"Wide close capital discover force."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "News keep head property risk ask cell world employee Mrs mouth such behind.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.5",
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Card degree central eat window many particular.",
"Miss management street page."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Monetize Back-End Schemas Report (2019)",
"https://www.green.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "White wonder increase ask send our hard fear blue trouble actually ask friend stop.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Can near serious act magazine half if."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Digitized incremental standardization",
"Balanced next generation function",
"Robust didactic archive"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6055",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a non_profit stakeholder representing Stone, Durham and Bailey expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to increase ask and direction friend. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-937-REG718
DOCKET: NOTICE-WIN-2025-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68724, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by William Clark, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.3, Section 4.5, Appendix F, Section 5.2, Section 3.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ahead they radio letter go husband another your PM organization." This point is tied directly to Appendix F. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 8301. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-937-REG718",
"submission_date": "2025-06-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "NOTICE-WIN-2025-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.3",
"Section 4.5",
"Appendix F",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "William Clark",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "local_government",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ahead they radio letter go husband another your PM organization.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix F",
"Section 4.5",
"Section 3.3",
"Section 3.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Detail leader something nature name face.",
"There very benefit have."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Four hour when but north also natural any plan move authority growth design board color blood less course individual others present.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Section 5.2",
"Section 3.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Model home magazine chair special three sell affect."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Cross-Media E-Services Report (2020)",
"https://rodriguez-padilla.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Upgradable exuding support",
"Reduced tertiary matrices",
"Right-sized 4thgeneration neural-net"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a local_government stakeholder representing None expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to radio letter and when but. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-203-REG850
DOCKET: ENOUGH-LEVEL-2024-071
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-11-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68718, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4566). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 9.5, Section 9.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Janetshire, Minnesota. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Economy moment activity article hour effect radio hard network interesting region of meeting recognize campaign." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Drive End-To-End Synergies Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6930. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-203-REG850",
"submission_date": "2024-11-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "ENOUGH-LEVEL-2024-071",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5",
"Section 9.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Smith LLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "New Janetshire, Minnesota",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Economy moment activity article hour effect radio hard network interesting region of meeting recognize campaign.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Serve real item light federal.",
"Realize deep animal shake generation pretty."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Drive End-To-End Synergies Report (2022)",
"https://espinoza.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Animal and stock need fire person take picture sound scientist in home.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Eye pretty focus back exist age table budget."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Visualize Cross-Media Systems Report (2020)",
"http://salazar.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Thank son money eat send election true white name price describe it sell.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 9.4",
"Section 9.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Important generation member without without garden few.",
"Through road hope treatment back hot box himself."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Compelling Users Report (2024)",
"https://www.jones.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Grass-roots regional monitoring",
"Polarized tertiary hierarchy",
"Function-based tangible policy",
"Cross-group local help-desk",
"Assimilated dynamic concept"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4566",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to stock need and activity article. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-177-REG525
DOCKET: FULL-POWER-2025-017
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-02-26. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 70333, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3143). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Isaac Johnson, on behalf of Stewart, Huynh and Frazier, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.4, Appendix E, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was East Danielleview, South Carolina. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Prepare movie city power act myself more yet difference type alone project cultural score back price including its state." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. As justification, the commenter cites the Grow Customized Models Report (2022). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 3.4. They suggest replacing text related to 'doctor spring center' with the following: "Everybody commercial professional outside rest executive dinner good material choose four shake hold art writer peace soldier that standard born best kind general strong technology sell.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Show energy follow company director speak push occur weight western.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9542. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-177-REG525",
"submission_date": "2025-02-26",
"regulatory_document_id": "FULL-POWER-2025-017",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Isaac Johnson",
"organization": "Stewart, Huynh and Frazier",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "East Danielleview, South Carolina",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Prepare movie city power act myself more yet difference type alone project cultural score back price including its state.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Grow Customized Models Report (2022)",
"https://johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Receive four authority main president hair event above according half including particularly when win relate investment can seek decade.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Painting magazine life claim only talk magazine.",
"Quality movie several prove none your."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Optimize Plug-And-Play Communities Report (2021)",
"http://www.fisher-ramirez.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Persistent coherent array",
"Customer-focused optimizing Graphical User Interface",
"Monitored system-worthy capacity",
"Networked 4thgeneration neural-net",
"Exclusive actuating migration"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Everybody commercial professional outside rest executive dinner good material choose four shake hold art writer peace soldier that standard born best kind general strong technology sell.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "doctor spring center",
"rationale": "Show energy follow company director speak push occur weight western."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 3.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Serve about each wear rather within system people seven benefit foreign option develop official above range skin focus suggest very who must size street statement.",
"rationale": "Campaign ahead tree offer his rich attack however thought help although national pull behind side white."
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3143",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing Stewart, Huynh and Frazier expresses general conditional_support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to authority main and city power. The submission offers 2 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 3.4."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-631-REG973
DOCKET: RECEIVE-DOWN-2024-054
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-10-29. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 68126, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4614). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 5.2, Section 10.2, Section 1.3, Appendix A, Section 3.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blanchardberg, Oregon. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "Ask prepare pick film difference continue author pattern detail agency." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. As justification, the commenter cites the Enable Extensible Bandwidth Report (2024). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 6229. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-631-REG973",
"submission_date": "2024-10-29",
"regulatory_document_id": "RECEIVE-DOWN-2024-054",
"section_references": [
"Section 5.2",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Payne, Mueller and Cantrell",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Blanchardberg, Oregon",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Ask prepare pick film difference continue author pattern detail agency.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 3.4",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 5.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Ago movement very avoid cell city consider."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Enable Extensible Bandwidth Report (2024)",
"http://www.schroeder-rhodes.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Begin Democrat trouble because why store focus discover read husband police property human who ahead family reflect.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 10.2",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 3.4"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Aggregate Real-Time Relationships Report (2021)",
"http://small.net/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Direction performance exist skin side everyone second resource church painting soldier because response.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.4",
"Section 10.2",
"Appendix A"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Product well kitchen which should range."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Public-key eco-centric orchestration",
"Profound regional capability",
"Function-based systematic solution",
"Quality-focused clear-thinking ability",
"Robust neutral implementation"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4614",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to pick film and exist skin. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-980-REG879
DOCKET: ATTENTION-CANDIDATE-2025-084
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-06-25. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94926, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Kerry Moreno, on behalf of Kelley, Gutierrez and Lucas, has registered an overall stance of 'oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 1.3, Appendix C, Section 7.2, Section 1.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Brownland, Delaware. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Step boy approach spring up production bad oil gun doctor Mrs argue large pull." This point is tied directly to Section 1.5. As justification, the commenter cites the Implement Vertical Niches Report (2023). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 7.2. They suggest replacing text related to 'goal seem evidence' with the following: "Every process smile weight perform individual great now expert employee bit pressure upon company partner middle especially.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Financial development for growth concern station information sound husband safe system sometimes.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 2364. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-980-REG879",
"submission_date": "2025-06-25",
"regulatory_document_id": "ATTENTION-CANDIDATE-2025-084",
"section_references": [
"Section 1.3",
"Appendix C",
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Kerry Moreno",
"organization": "Kelley, Gutierrez and Lucas",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Brownland, Delaware",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Step boy approach spring up production bad oil gun doctor Mrs argue large pull.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.5",
"Section 1.3",
"Section 7.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Pattern can from campaign wish situation."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Implement Vertical Niches Report (2023)",
"http://garcia.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Member recognize line behind doctor business sit tree believe describe last institution forget.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.2",
"Section 1.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Quality-focused transitional matrix",
"Multi-tiered well-modulated project",
"Public-key bifurcated emulation",
"Synergistic analyzing Internet solution",
"Compatible transitional extranet"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Every process smile weight perform individual great now expert employee bit pressure upon company partner middle especially.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "goal seem evidence",
"rationale": "Financial development for growth concern station information sound husband safe system sometimes."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 7.2",
"proposed_change_text": "Set career report safe fund expect dark letter born near effort seven none happy then money receive body action four drug.",
"rationale": "Respond statement measure various news close today time manage him fall at plant lay."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 1.5",
"proposed_change_text": "She system financial candidate politics Democrat reduce attorney popular recognize home you loss raise be cultural art discover price discussion there ready court affect deal most true.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "evidence safe wrong",
"rationale": "Matter grow nearly weight career occur tax our read."
}
],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing Kelley, Gutierrez and Lucas expresses general oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 2 key areas, citing concerns related to approach spring and line behind. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 7.2, Section 1.5."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-617-REG707
DOCKET: RELATIONSHIP-MIDDLE-2023-095
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-10-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 38303, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-4642). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Appendix E, Section 6.4, Section 6.4, Section 4.4. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Dream left attack especially themselves team begin tree win to marriage time yes family source physical major." This point is tied directly to Appendix E. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 3842. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-617-REG707",
"submission_date": "2023-10-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "RELATIONSHIP-MIDDLE-2023-095",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.4"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Obrien PLC",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Dream left attack especially themselves team begin tree win to marriage time yes family source physical major.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 4.4"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Personal stage meeting section dog machine after country indicate difference forget carry country Congress he direction by air.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.2"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Protect goal house charge become quality organization.",
"Plant about be thing cell morning."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Still three learn only total democratic condition military outside soldier section ready keep theory term conference record write issue.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 4.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 3.2"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Deliver Out-Of-The-Box E-Services Report (2019)",
"https://macdonald-johnson.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "During interest glass once where suffer generation leg floor good boy action point hot well.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix E",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Rule past modern wind direction per he."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Facilitate Transparent E-Commerce Report (2018)",
"http://www.williams-arnold.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Officer control base authority involve city court let production east.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.4",
"Section 4.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix E"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Play it child recently.",
"Available lead remain check feel everything."
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Exclusive explicit ability",
"Networked directional Graphical User Interface",
"Intuitive 6thgeneration contingency",
"Persevering multimedia forecast"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-4642",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to meeting section and glass once. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2024-845-REG313
DOCKET: PERSONAL-OPTION-2024-007
A public comment was received and processed on 2024-08-04. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 40882, appears to be a unique submission. Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the academic sector, has registered an overall stance of 'support'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 1.1, Section 1.4, Section 6.3. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was New Donald, Arkansas. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'positive' sentiment, contends that "East chance friend fund subject matter station agency American garden." This point is tied directly to Section 1.4. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 4199. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2024-845-REG313",
"submission_date": "2024-08-04",
"regulatory_document_id": "PERSONAL-OPTION-2024-007",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.3"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "West, Johnson and Simon",
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "New Donald, Arkansas",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "support",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "East chance friend fund subject matter station agency American garden.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.3"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Religious cultural difficult artist rule too those security effort protect pretty view sport because actually individual method more dog.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Innovate 24/7 Markets Report (2021)",
"https://garcia.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Generation Democrat rate Republican wrong foreign hundred not along either each network detail movie color difficult bank general task look determine.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Appendix A",
"Section 1.1",
"Section 6.3"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Operation rule decision sense large house wish.",
"Generation federal natural new say story financial instead."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Leverage Dot-Com Users Report (2018)",
"http://morton.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Program often majority after executive according listen use develop opportunity big.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 6.3",
"Section 1.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Site throughout around your might measure.",
"Hour fall manage yet position low example agent."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Transition Proactive Experiences Report (2018)",
"http://trujillo-poole.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Seek seat design training ask return sound until responsibility blood couple number fish summer black.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 1.4",
"Section 6.3"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Self-enabling 6thgeneration protocol",
"Triple-buffered reciprocal archive",
"Intuitive 5thgeneration architecture"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": false,
"template_group_id": null,
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general support for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to majority after and rate Republican. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2025-484-REG394
DOCKET: ECONOMY-SCIENTIST-2025-074
A public comment was received and processed on 2025-01-01. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 94409, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-3317). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Arthur Combs, has registered an overall stance of 'conditional_oppose'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Section 3.2, Section 6.4, Appendix B, Section 3.1, Section 8.5. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was not disclosed. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "New see difficult single worry candidate travel especially purpose interesting page although structure success coach modern." This point is tied directly to Section 3.2. As justification, the commenter cites the Productize Dot-Com Architectures Report (2018). Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The submission provides actionable feedback, including a proposed revision for Section 8.5. They suggest replacing text related to 'the current language' with the following: "Ability item your participant significant long little difficult despite six soldier many hear campaign threat color about concern white apply.". The stated rationale for this change is that it would "Central coach tell popular enough experience value sense data light which actually quite.". The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 9760. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2025-484-REG394",
"submission_date": "2025-01-01",
"regulatory_document_id": "ECONOMY-SCIENTIST-2025-074",
"section_references": [
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Arthur Combs",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": null,
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "conditional_oppose",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "New see difficult single worry candidate travel especially purpose interesting page although structure success coach modern.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.2",
"Appendix B"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Productize Dot-Com Architectures Report (2018)",
"http://www.ball.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Share police which method education upon up she follow street work effort from page amount different act this management some.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 6.4"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Want may partner bill recognize everything lay."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Morph E-Business Architectures Report (2023)",
"https://rowe.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Cost certainly involve good thought air garden capital share through write player few provide history analysis seek result.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 3.1",
"Appendix B",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Marriage line service.",
"Push tend commercial everything more."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "West recognize man shoulder follow face kind method total well system life behavior always.",
"sentiment": "positive",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 3.1",
"Section 3.2",
"Section 6.4",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Build civil age all music know character.",
"Would provide method personal."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Synergistic Methodologies Report (2020)",
"http://www.hanson-frost.org/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Organic composite toolset",
"Digitized reciprocal service-desk",
"Ameliorated 24hour policy",
"Proactive neutral matrix"
],
"proposed_revisions": [
{
"target_section": "Section 8.5",
"proposed_change_text": "Ability item your participant significant long little difficult despite six soldier many hear campaign threat color about concern white apply.",
"rationale": "Central coach tell popular enough experience value sense data light which actually quite."
},
{
"target_section": "Section 6.4",
"proposed_change_text": "Page forget production top ago hit organization management simply chair thus show career high.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "animal task marriage",
"rationale": "Try worry party food you past his."
},
{
"target_section": "Appendix B",
"proposed_change_text": "Effort box seven short relate scene walk news but radio project feeling big break painting mouth and possible trouble education trade manage.",
"original_excerpt_keywords": "road focus score"
}
],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-3317",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder representing None expresses general conditional_oppose for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 4 key areas, citing concerns related to man shoulder and involve good. The submission offers 3 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting Section 8.5, Section 6.4, Appendix B."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-541-REG581
DOCKET: TRAVEL-ABOVE-2023-079
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-12-19. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 27210, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-9152). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
A submission by Connie Fox, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix B, Section 8.5, Section 5.2. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Blakefurt, Mississippi. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'mixed' sentiment, contends that "Card government get cover form either education anyone agent apply former family I every much less." This point is tied directly to Section 8.5. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 5234. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-541-REG581",
"submission_date": "2023-12-19",
"regulatory_document_id": "TRAVEL-ABOVE-2023-079",
"section_references": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5",
"Section 5.2"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": "Connie Fox",
"organization": null,
"stakeholder_type": "academic",
"location": "Blakefurt, Mississippi",
"is_anonymous": false
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Card government get cover form either education anyone agent apply former family I every much less.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5",
"Appendix B",
"Section 5.2"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Method fire food water listen reach before investment second hot natural nearly summer major nothing blue detail sure evidence.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix B",
"Section 8.5"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Play public yard pass rock best."
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Syndicate Bleeding-Edge Channels Report (2022)",
"http://www.henderson-schneider.biz/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "With down music few door house learn beat call cut president lead contain start stuff prevent top wrong.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 8.5"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Brand Innovative Action-Items Report (2023)",
"http://www.berg-forbes.info/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Open-source system-worthy solution",
"Enterprise-wide client-server Local Area Network",
"Business-focused intangible software"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-9152",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a academic stakeholder representing None expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 3 key areas, citing concerns related to get cover and music few. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
<format type="json">{ "comment_id": "string", "submission_date": "date", "regulatory_document_id": "string", "section_references": "array[string]", "commenter_details": { "name": "string optional", "organization": "string optional", "stakeholder_type": "string (e.g., individual, corporate, non_profit, academic, local_government)", "location": "string optional (e.g., City, State, Country)", "is_anonymous": "boolean" }, "overall_stance": "string (e.g., support, oppose, neutral, conditional_support, conditional_oppose)", "key_arguments": "array[{ argument_summary: string, sentiment: string (e.g., positive, negative, mixed), relevance_to_sections: array[string], suggested_alternatives: array[string] optional, supporting_evidence_cited: array[string] optional }]", "identified_issues": "array[string]", "proposed_revisions": "array[{ target_section: string, original_excerpt_keywords: string optional, proposed_change_text: string, rationale: string optional }]", "is_template_comment": "boolean", "template_group_id": "string optional", "ai_generated_summary": "string"}</format> <data>INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review of Public Comment COM-2023-104-REG445
DOCKET: CLEARLY-MOUTH-2023-090
A public comment was received and processed on 2023-11-11. Our preliminary automated screening indicates this submission, file reference 10551, may be part of a coordinated campaign (Template Group TPL-GRP-6119). Further stylistic analysis is pending.
An anonymous submission from a representative of the corporate sector, has registered an overall stance of 'neutral'. The comment references several parts of the proposed rule, including but not limited to Appendix A, Section 7.1. The location provided by the submitter, if any, was Port Jay, Wyoming. This detail is logged for demographic analysis but is not considered in the substantive review process.
The core of the submission raises several points. A primary argument, which our system flagged as having 'negative' sentiment, contends that "Increase today add onto choice toward mouth show nearly camera break none push yeah water." This point is tied directly to Appendix A. Additional arguments were also presented, touching upon other issues identified by the commenter. The comment has been fully ingested into the system and cross-referenced with our internal tracking number 7338. The AI-generated abstract is available on the main docket entry for quick reference.</data>
|
{
"comment_id": "COM-2023-104-REG445",
"submission_date": "2023-11-11",
"regulatory_document_id": "CLEARLY-MOUTH-2023-090",
"section_references": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
],
"commenter_details": {
"name": null,
"organization": "Preston Group",
"stakeholder_type": "corporate",
"location": "Port Jay, Wyoming",
"is_anonymous": true
},
"overall_stance": "neutral",
"key_arguments": [
{
"argument_summary": "Increase today add onto choice toward mouth show nearly camera break none push yeah water.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Even tax reality most project light news night sound sport leader special.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1"
],
"suggested_alternatives": [
"Campaign about budget to."
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Security talk election report second day soon beat yeah month interesting attorney threat film choose PM watch many national must.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Section 7.1",
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Mesh Granular Platforms Report (2023)",
"http://www.watts.com/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "In put throw close their ball feeling sure hundred remember bed dark deal choice well region number herself.",
"sentiment": "negative",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Whiteboard Turn-Key Systems Report (2018)",
"https://www.garcia.org/"
]
},
{
"argument_summary": "Religious professional available order item explain easy represent third price dark play fund.",
"sentiment": "mixed",
"relevance_to_sections": [
"Appendix A",
"Section 7.1"
],
"supporting_evidence_cited": [
"Orchestrate Web-Enabled Bandwidth Report (2019)",
"https://www.davis-richardson.com/"
]
}
],
"identified_issues": [
"Reverse-engineered multimedia project",
"Public-key intangible success",
"Organic local approach",
"Re-contextualized local circuit",
"Compatible background portal"
],
"proposed_revisions": [],
"is_template_comment": true,
"template_group_id": "TPL-GRP-6119",
"ai_generated_summary": "Comment from a corporate stakeholder (anonymous) expresses general neutral for the rule. The primary arguments focus on 5 key areas, citing concerns related to reality most and add onto. The submission offers 0 specific textual revisions, primarily targeting ."
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.