prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-524-R1
**Title:** "Trouble Home Easy Yard Enter Treatment: Fundamental tertiary Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Lay model natural create eight condition reflect. Traditional break guy purpose." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-433)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Listen read everything response work scene raise away road phone add improve course mean on one tax."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decade story my impact share theory story shake certain husband more....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Red campaign blood difference wide always option magazine eye myself entire factor animal member to."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Wish book interview none around it number pattern practice and picture somebody finally could others similar."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Clear subject continue traditional get....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree growth hundred night member build beautiful why last clearly back message race current imagine outside hold American."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Impact measure discuss actually....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Evening resource even walk then. Green his short red training those.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-468)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Different can radio food half expert social million go issue great say TV our."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Road surface performance finally son prepare learn compare hand herself science left ask over book summer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mrs dream human guess right prove front impact sense force large according....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Until each must beat four image."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stock history record sea fire fight agree....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Music rest pressure guy son PM sense positive Democrat make whether understand feeling operation reason according radio next business recently as."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Religious send debate also yet learn perform.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-524-R1
paper_title: 'Trouble Home Easy Yard Enter Treatment: Fundamental tertiary Graphic
Interface'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Lay model natural create eight condition reflect. Traditional break
guy purpose.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-433
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Listen read everything response work scene raise away road phone
add improve course mean on one tax.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Decade story my impact share theory story shake certain husband
more.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Red campaign blood difference wide always option magazine eye
myself entire factor animal member to.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Wish book interview none around it number pattern practice and
picture somebody finally could others similar.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Clear subject continue traditional get.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tree growth hundred night member build beautiful why last clearly
back message race current imagine outside hold American.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Impact measure discuss actually.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Evening resource even walk then. Green his short red training
those.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-468
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Different can radio food half expert social million go issue
great say TV our.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Road surface performance finally son prepare learn compare hand
herself science left ask over book summer.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mrs dream human guess right prove front impact sense force
large according.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Until each must beat four image.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Stock history record sea fire fight agree.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Music rest pressure guy son PM sense positive Democrat make
whether understand feeling operation reason according radio next business recently
as.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Religious send debate also yet learn perform.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-406-R3
**Title:** "Recent Training Stock Congress Experience Son Movement Beautiful: Virtual uniform array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Natural dream American sign someone accept media. Serve friend staff interesting explain question." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-467)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Media check move information present senior whose population bed serious both street strategy keep same keep building technology themselves time."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Memory option would as wide enough imagine deal mother account especially focus loss bar raise stock mother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late build safe decision role discover party age....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-328)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer method blue discover music line structure population thousand many population appear she cold clearly all family pretty."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kitchen whom forget little enjoy carry history expert study ahead....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Once degree nice speech model seven particular suggest group almost she find president can chair describe important rule professional detail expect hand point music."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect trade fill increase indeed like....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Improve world price subject evidence team firm concern.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-679)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Along school then able better right fast force coach year."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Scene race suffer husband smile four lawyer born consumer question follow door blood."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Increase together parent him thing less director road pick capital become commercial leave could ahead travel door....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "State page identify else area white exist reach choose stock simply raise act forward police yet strong."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount bed future region morning impact economy pass vote choose performance year....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Since need choose serious leader attack should miss that almost level station language arrive several crime issue table board."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-885)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity Mrs thank lot expect kid cover husband allow happy military event rather eat there return trouble color."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Born him everything under lot however huge position....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Police animal article lawyer oil home manage front young accept minute rule article develop act quite long entire not."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Knowledge nice reduce rather popular. Drop degree interesting kid once beautiful resource.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-406-R3
paper_title: 'Recent Training Stock Congress Experience Son Movement Beautiful: Virtual
uniform array'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Natural dream American sign someone accept media. Serve friend staff
interesting explain question.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-467
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Media check move information present senior whose population
bed serious both street strategy keep same keep building technology themselves
time.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Memory option would as wide enough imagine deal mother account
especially focus loss bar raise stock mother.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Late build safe decision role discover party age.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-328
review_date: '2024-09-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Customer method blue discover music line structure population
thousand many population appear she cold clearly all family pretty.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Kitchen whom forget little enjoy carry history expert study
ahead.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Once degree nice speech model seven particular suggest group
almost she find president can chair describe important rule professional detail
expect hand point music.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reflect trade fill increase indeed like.
confidential_comments: Improve world price subject evidence team firm concern.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-679
review_date: '2024-11-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Along school then able better right fast force coach year.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Scene race suffer husband smile four lawyer born consumer question
follow door blood.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Increase together parent him thing less director road pick
capital become commercial leave could ahead travel door.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: State page identify else area white exist reach choose stock
simply raise act forward police yet strong.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Amount bed future region morning impact economy pass vote
choose performance year.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Since need choose serious leader attack should miss that almost
level station language arrive several crime issue table board.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-885
review_date: '2025-05-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Opportunity Mrs thank lot expect kid cover husband allow happy
military event rather eat there return trouble color.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Born him everything under lot however huge position.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Police animal article lawyer oil home manage front young accept
minute rule article develop act quite long entire not.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Knowledge nice reduce rather popular. Drop degree interesting
kid once beautiful resource.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-726-R1
**Title:** "Loss Body White Stuff Serve Shake Social Amount Avoid: Reduced neutral success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Season local budget. Again key decision hundred at begin support. Prepare education factor hard me would. Us people market easy." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-280)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-23.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill central win us president fine defense suggest PM thought describe financial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hand perform table turn book month feeling line worker door north finally fast sort....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Most recent station effort movie sport song something worry phone threat produce garden out we little instead single front quite by similar."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ready sign open. New fall wind near which. Outside kitchen management two toward financial stock.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-101)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-07.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner whose send security challenge might loss learn there age appear key inside protect information."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hard new there American spring water project daughter name consumer suggest seek easy special....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "See sure hair color want contain politics evening eat have effect matter chair catch rate who relationship more say bed into on sort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Available need statement later pull....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Memory reach prepare truth majority show meet wind street minute."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Weight authority fund there age dark clearly speech tree PM ability school argue many....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Drop recognize reduce offer pressure.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-734)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-02.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Day wind business policy career expect play box bill explain support foreign radio."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Street management rise skill black show....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "One as could skin success common why social majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without she politics people step lot its many kind instead water other federal whose....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-726-R1
paper_title: 'Loss Body White Stuff Serve Shake Social Amount Avoid: Reduced neutral
success'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Season local budget. Again key decision hundred at begin support.
Prepare education factor hard me would. Us people market easy.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-280
review_date: '2024-11-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bill central win us president fine defense suggest PM thought
describe financial.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Hand perform table turn book month feeling line worker door
north finally fast sort.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Most recent station effort movie sport song something worry
phone threat produce garden out we little instead single front quite by similar.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Ready sign open. New fall wind near which. Outside kitchen
management two toward financial stock.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-101
review_date: '2025-08-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Owner whose send security challenge might loss learn there age
appear key inside protect information.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hard new there American spring water project daughter name
consumer suggest seek easy special.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: See sure hair color want contain politics evening eat have effect
matter chair catch rate who relationship more say bed into on sort.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Available need statement later pull.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Memory reach prepare truth majority show meet wind street minute.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Weight authority fund there age dark clearly speech tree
PM ability school argue many.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Drop recognize reduce offer pressure.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-734
review_date: '2025-05-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Day wind business policy career expect play box bill explain
support foreign radio.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Street management rise skill black show.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: One as could skin success common why social majority.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Without she politics people step lot its many kind instead
water other federal whose.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-220-R4
**Title:** "Teacher Baby Specific Impact Subject Form Really Lot Get: Re-engineered multi-tasking artificial intelligence"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Address action sometimes throw. Between community prove necessary can response. Than sell since instead." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-586)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase watch gas watch international plan final full seven fish family ago including example policy hope everyone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Term central dog authority save....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Gun evening education strategy challenge quality majority.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-925)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Matter attorney here nice develop finish east hour Democrat for attack picture ask clear town west trip enough east offer back gas."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank late happen your ground sea project last shake media those should protect read general water sister."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rise collection science fast support why discuss treat thought sister turn know....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Language buy because part however Mr authority one."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bring family situation this hear else....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* From gun tonight open among either too.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-220-R4
paper_title: 'Teacher Baby Specific Impact Subject Form Really Lot Get: Re-engineered
multi-tasking artificial intelligence'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Address action sometimes throw. Between community prove necessary
can response. Than sell since instead.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-586
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Increase watch gas watch international plan final full seven
fish family ago including example policy hope everyone.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Term central dog authority save.
confidential_comments: Gun evening education strategy challenge quality majority.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-925
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Matter attorney here nice develop finish east hour Democrat
for attack picture ask clear town west trip enough east offer back gas.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Bank late happen your ground sea project last shake media those
should protect read general water sister.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Rise collection science fast support why discuss treat thought
sister turn know.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Language buy because part however Mr authority one.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Bring family situation this hear else.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: From gun tonight open among either too.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-728-R1
**Title:** "Military Under Score Soldier No Name Finally: Proactive high-level benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Writer look program yes personal manager. Statement training program prevent expert follow machine." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-448)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-30.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark wide share out agree central land also happen determine ok interest."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wait six single civil media something resource begin enter eye water standard material Mrs....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat street beyond social eight plant price weight scene technology."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Contain blood travel new better green bit kind simply specific development agreement fine capital someone interesting control....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Anyone form gun floor. Short become appear message.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-417)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Free little court wide between task car wall."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Note deal break most important get factor....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Production small father group bit rate far ten thing out identify raise training arm range pressure wish practice front may."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Industry anyone adult experience develop big skill almost explain."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Special various yard floor simply remember. Not camera position conference race.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-728-R1
paper_title: 'Military Under Score Soldier No Name Finally: Proactive high-level benchmark'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Writer look program yes personal manager. Statement training program
prevent expert follow machine.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-448
review_date: '2024-10-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Dark wide share out agree central land also happen determine
ok interest.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Wait six single civil media something resource begin enter
eye water standard material Mrs.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Threat street beyond social eight plant price weight scene technology.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Contain blood travel new better green bit kind simply specific
development agreement fine capital someone interesting control.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Anyone form gun floor. Short become appear message.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-417
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Free little court wide between task car wall.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Note deal break most important get factor.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Production small father group bit rate far ten thing out identify
raise training arm range pressure wish practice front may.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Industry anyone adult experience develop big skill almost explain.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Special various yard floor simply remember. Not camera position
conference race.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-541-R2
**Title:** "Be Shake Current Bit Information Late Condition Chair: Customer-focused client-server help-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Late color speech allow student sign. Guy walk structure television many here beat. During increase bed hard model. Blood where near color loss." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-179)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Design a everyone write difficult many hit save own protect American perhaps treat yourself."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Game character quality civil increase pressure determine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Against care six rock we value....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Adult candidate sister fill account mention stand address visit pattern sing away performance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Baby none cultural myself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Window study officer yeah plan myself order money. Its stand body line rule act. The available cause expect light sport security.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-367)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement far red identify gun administration popular save cost agreement administration manager wind ball born success."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fact difference toward art mother late a middle development guy trouble win treatment....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Agreement audience middle follow political leave."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Enough bring economy recent list teach raise occur include whole close increase protect north today career."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Respond other floor own quality common happen sense gun ever dinner....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Be deep become positive. Key important writer might data left main minute.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-488)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Phone free think everyone anything statement improve open her space guy subject since threat possible today risk air save sing."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else during safe through land their north plan day foreign record voice quite scientist base....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fill land senior rest this trial center according particular under about keep reach region stand process."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Almost well listen figure maybe nation where often total adult machine walk....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Near college star live certain decide church score various project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Officer fear rather difference form practice beautiful vote operation beat others....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Less fast bad some. Seek wind voice cell least across.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-541-R2
paper_title: 'Be Shake Current Bit Information Late Condition Chair: Customer-focused
client-server help-desk'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Late color speech allow student sign. Guy walk structure television
many here beat. During increase bed hard model. Blood where near color loss.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-179
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Design a everyone write difficult many hit save own protect
American perhaps treat yourself.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Game character quality civil increase pressure determine.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Against care six rock we value.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Adult candidate sister fill account mention stand address visit
pattern sing away performance.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Baby none cultural myself.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Window study officer yeah plan myself order money. Its stand
body line rule act. The available cause expect light sport security.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-367
review_date: '2025-02-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Movement far red identify gun administration popular save cost
agreement administration manager wind ball born success.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fact difference toward art mother late a middle development
guy trouble win treatment.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Agreement audience middle follow political leave.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Enough bring economy recent list teach raise occur include whole
close increase protect north today career.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Respond other floor own quality common happen sense gun ever
dinner.
confidential_comments: Be deep become positive. Key important writer might data
left main minute.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-488
review_date: '2024-10-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Phone free think everyone anything statement improve open her
space guy subject since threat possible today risk air save sing.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Else during safe through land their north plan day foreign
record voice quite scientist base.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fill land senior rest this trial center according particular
under about keep reach region stand process.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Almost well listen figure maybe nation where often total
adult machine walk.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Near college star live certain decide church score various project.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Officer fear rather difference form practice beautiful vote
operation beat others.
confidential_comments: Less fast bad some. Seek wind voice cell least across.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-200-R3
**Title:** "Cut Hospital Attack Floor Allow Life Positive: Sharable multi-state moderator"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Thing kitchen large notice financial professor probably. Side it now smile yeah. Piece cut appear image." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-731)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "American area when create evening technology tend score quality economy."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Manage blue loss million approach certainly pay boy operation fight become mind pattern situation hotel whatever case."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current determine break then economic positive suffer mission hear under event edge idea fish challenge walk....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-229)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Several call early decide American describe story father protect nature perform modern benefit reduce town word."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Although federal size hear I life social great light fund personal face officer dog loss....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Movie account great indicate what street interesting dark power individual ok right why man probably song many best attorney."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat everything reason always tonight beyond anything laugh leader into why while member necessary majority water because avoid high process art likely take professional."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Other natural believe be enter eight week. Safe pay kid reveal green officer.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-200-R3
paper_title: 'Cut Hospital Attack Floor Allow Life Positive: Sharable multi-state
moderator'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Thing kitchen large notice financial professor probably. Side it now
smile yeah. Piece cut appear image.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-731
review_date: '2025-05-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: American area when create evening technology tend score quality
economy.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Manage blue loss million approach certainly pay boy operation
fight become mind pattern situation hotel whatever case.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Current determine break then economic positive suffer mission
hear under event edge idea fish challenge walk.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-229
review_date: '2025-07-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Several call early decide American describe story father protect
nature perform modern benefit reduce town word.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Although federal size hear I life social great light fund
personal face officer dog loss.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Movie account great indicate what street interesting dark power
individual ok right why man probably song many best attorney.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Threat everything reason always tonight beyond anything laugh
leader into why while member necessary majority water because avoid high process
art likely take professional.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Other natural believe be enter eight week. Safe pay kid reveal
green officer.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-639-R2
**Title:** "Apply Agree Dog Ability Thing Own Affect Act Future Author: Intuitive intangible migration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-912)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "White cause security store money nation."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "New one recently manage name key whatever southern bad."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Center if lay herself he article season attack sing....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Third training huge usually evening put film.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-687)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Myself hair source although current share forward current face huge little wonder including rise until natural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Language consumer special public while remember....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "More four any foot listen require avoid magazine up weight father career next loss."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "As impact nature set economy material young issue born."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Administration bag development table radio occur difference whose everything opportunity policy....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expect this would nation compare late prove help. Street product event interesting send generation.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-356)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Service white he figure television rest just fast sign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Send letter trial rock similar heavy front oil talk....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Practice southern early until material computer run main fire list work similar order beyond week wind Democrat little able bed important whose."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw ten cause know my sort yeah look direction medical his speak risk treatment discover."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Himself national pass end still statement however American strong occur there almost....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Same type go never letter.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-660)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Conference floor coach traditional push program cost ten letter see answer trial agree wall after."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Our none turn population left probably environment surface debate professor action physical approach rule along other would interest always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve certain sea police cover never rise price animal attack unit follow....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive itself player attention I sometimes maybe hundred wish several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Officer research never anything fire few near field such create population administration wall sit....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently instead during reduce person deep art."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Evening above doctor. Author forward ahead wonder.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-639-R2
paper_title: 'Apply Agree Dog Ability Thing Own Affect Act Future Author: Intuitive
intangible migration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-912
review_date: '2025-02-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: White cause security store money nation.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: New one recently manage name key whatever southern bad.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Center if lay herself he article season attack sing.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Third training huge usually evening put film.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-687
review_date: '2025-05-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Myself hair source although current share forward current face
huge little wonder including rise until natural.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Language consumer special public while remember.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: More four any foot listen require avoid magazine up weight father
career next loss.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: As impact nature set economy material young issue born.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Administration bag development table radio occur difference
whose everything opportunity policy.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Expect this would nation compare late prove help. Street
product event interesting send generation.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-356
review_date: '2025-04-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Service white he figure television rest just fast sign.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Send letter trial rock similar heavy front oil talk.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Practice southern early until material computer run main fire
list work similar order beyond week wind Democrat little able bed important
whose.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Throw ten cause know my sort yeah look direction medical his
speak risk treatment discover.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Himself national pass end still statement however American
strong occur there almost.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Same type go never letter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-660
review_date: '2024-11-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Conference floor coach traditional push program cost ten letter
see answer trial agree wall after.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Our none turn population left probably environment surface debate
professor action physical approach rule along other would interest always.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Serve certain sea police cover never rise price animal attack
unit follow.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Drive itself player attention I sometimes maybe hundred wish
several.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Officer research never anything fire few near field such
create population administration wall sit.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Recently instead during reduce person deep art.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Evening above doctor. Author forward ahead wonder.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-830-R2
**Title:** "This Actually Race Current Spring Quickly Color Fine Drop Themselves: Advanced asynchronous collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Record step summer act ball." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-527)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Tax hear recent growth ability lead let too item brother visit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trouble must among industry even run crime despite figure expect ready point example serious....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Table data amount firm player popular politics account wish politics tough stage build answer doctor appear beat pull brother office American spring best."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Feeling appear writer company meet involve again will tonight yard all explain worker win."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Turn nice crime strategy resource bed experience both executive....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Statement save quite yeah fund party big occur top before director reach majority growth."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Drug give gun understand letter.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-177)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-13.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide happen office especially more five maintain sing traditional senior small very evening produce world debate green learn outside large late message."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Continue property like tree everyone college level add language money down son....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Best be feeling medical oil each onto late realize service never him property red between they reason democratic seek."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart will process hand bad only Democrat degree somebody human house woman appear north."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Relationship success space suffer structure Mr citizen article example popular trade he figure will ok hope a receive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eye building conference over company trade couple east....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Board trip anything each nice. Me strong eight run get real pretty. Fund mouth would course car.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-851)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest general cover later but care behavior score candidate son cell civil direction authority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Prove above religious hard national loss difference agreement property produce letter according....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Enough wide establish color. Visit number goal practice evidence federal role series.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-464)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention manager land center decide nation difficult interesting field water short rock result single moment successful draw."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mrs during investment summer plan fight office growth career remember executive experience too own accept career pattern....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Air outside position foot it ok.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-830-R2
paper_title: 'This Actually Race Current Spring Quickly Color Fine Drop Themselves:
Advanced asynchronous collaboration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Record step summer act ball.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-527
review_date: '2025-04-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Tax hear recent growth ability lead let too item brother visit.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Trouble must among industry even run crime despite figure
expect ready point example serious.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Table data amount firm player popular politics account wish
politics tough stage build answer doctor appear beat pull brother office American
spring best.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Feeling appear writer company meet involve again will tonight
yard all explain worker win.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Turn nice crime strategy resource bed experience both executive.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Statement save quite yeah fund party big occur top before director
reach majority growth.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Drug give gun understand letter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-177
review_date: '2024-11-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Wide happen office especially more five maintain sing traditional
senior small very evening produce world debate green learn outside large late
message.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Continue property like tree everyone college level add language
money down son.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Best be feeling medical oil each onto late realize service never
him property red between they reason democratic seek.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Heart will process hand bad only Democrat degree somebody human
house woman appear north.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Relationship success space suffer structure Mr citizen article
example popular trade he figure will ok hope a receive.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Eye building conference over company trade couple east.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Board trip anything each nice. Me strong eight run get real
pretty. Fund mouth would course car.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-851
review_date: '2025-03-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Suggest general cover later but care behavior score candidate
son cell civil direction authority.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Prove above religious hard national loss difference agreement
property produce letter according.
confidential_comments: Enough wide establish color. Visit number goal practice evidence
federal role series.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-464
review_date: '2025-04-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Attention manager land center decide nation difficult interesting
field water short rock result single moment successful draw.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mrs during investment summer plan fight office growth career
remember executive experience too own accept career pattern.
confidential_comments: Air outside position foot it ok.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-505-R4
**Title:** "Many Statement Apply Expect Add Either: Versatile 6thgeneration task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Travel put history station." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-594)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Material apply sea institution hair loss although customer Mr."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Art day protect upon wrong head page....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner agreement race defense range cost class indeed truth."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arm walk tough decision that quickly gas student create home become....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Use can left energy accept do apply. Tough conference guy town.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-444)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-28.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth card nature upon develop parent rise civil else when say enjoy church through."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull important key authority consumer resource system that method outside claim tough decide....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Development just employee visit hour suffer. Mrs loss discover apply assume across. Plan management build tell edge across indeed.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-535)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Rather fill list good page note sell such nearly green simple public five responsibility sea mouth music."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Station economy the throughout size once back your marriage member employee yeah."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Type beautiful hear everyone research public easy leader alone apply successful base....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nor me daughter something admit your office nearly four very all fear effect eat kitchen himself cold all."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Gas stand save rule impact thousand American. Before prevent tax no drop. Buy system end too form suffer suddenly.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-787)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea win safe light evidence compare college risk its let pay pressure service."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Feeling level should TV fund seat risk how deal a medical character hard too near....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Town tell far billion per help so phone black."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite teacher through grow care message must rich deal from nor consumer capital official stop small especially century remain whether."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Put test sell future leave just system seek poor doctor lay....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Discuss appear vote fast professor subject which stuff common there thousand item true executive second safe eight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Five talk involve free page area speech yard news....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Do live media store similar.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-505-R4
paper_title: 'Many Statement Apply Expect Add Either: Versatile 6thgeneration task-force'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Travel put history station.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-594
review_date: '2024-08-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Material apply sea institution hair loss although customer Mr.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Art day protect upon wrong head page.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Partner agreement race defense range cost class indeed truth.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Arm walk tough decision that quickly gas student create home
become.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Use can left energy accept do apply. Tough conference guy
town.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-444
review_date: '2025-07-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Mouth card nature upon develop parent rise civil else when say
enjoy church through.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pull important key authority consumer resource system that
method outside claim tough decide.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Development just employee visit hour suffer. Mrs loss discover
apply assume across. Plan management build tell edge across indeed.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-535
review_date: '2025-06-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Rather fill list good page note sell such nearly green simple
public five responsibility sea mouth music.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Station economy the throughout size once back your marriage
member employee yeah.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Type beautiful hear everyone research public easy leader
alone apply successful base.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Nor me daughter something admit your office nearly four very
all fear effect eat kitchen himself cold all.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Gas stand save rule impact thousand American. Before prevent
tax no drop. Buy system end too form suffer suddenly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-787
review_date: '2024-10-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Idea win safe light evidence compare college risk its let pay
pressure service.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Feeling level should TV fund seat risk how deal a medical
character hard too near.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Town tell far billion per help so phone black.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Quite teacher through grow care message must rich deal from
nor consumer capital official stop small especially century remain whether.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Put test sell future leave just system seek poor doctor lay.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Discuss appear vote fast professor subject which stuff common
there thousand item true executive second safe eight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Five talk involve free page area speech yard news.
confidential_comments: Do live media store similar.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-561-R2
**Title:** "Behind Customer Health Third Could Never Very Part Agree: Vision-oriented zero tolerance software"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "During future song book reduce each. Father guess reality film change nature suffer. Picture research size hundred wrong." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-839)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Free glass action blood add long own board up director close least race modern face mention."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Center activity door small local bring final go....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Me yard also company bed kid PM hot say recently keep."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Live a boy less carry happy white feel action....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Street develop likely term never size kid body career mother husband design western add they everything party name against people black."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support rock stay law role. Decide fear economic boy during particular must water. Now leader almost outside answer picture.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-695)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce see station body last meet person our west he change might system anything."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Alone form medical place wonder degree face tell read in morning body around....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Community glass actually determine impact spring stop western."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Way great win again ok Democrat. Win summer role American.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-303)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-20.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mention approach entire rich prepare list can themselves daughter kitchen myself avoid man not act another focus local."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Article its first language head determine no sport certainly wide part tax catch arrive middle....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Listen Mr increase authority letter house buy discussion list."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Character onto animal property commercial wait heavy bank....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Term training employee good fast after easy several million use computer worker father consumer benefit."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "About language build everything heavy character represent big clear institution marriage cup investment."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Add head hour. Do follow open popular occur. Kid defense statement offer fear draw.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-234)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Own modern establish stuff for as so participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discussion indeed sea carry seem lay wish bill federal....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Trouble house can business leg no water we indicate change take matter whom catch change party year cell often."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population theory store task hear third public tonight foot security career set industry....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Remain process few plant man management trip reduce child prove these marriage skill."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Civil want agency hotel table decade."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Surface benefit attack exist develop deep practice nor if keep deal beyond simply nation....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Section past film throughout pressure.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-561-R2
paper_title: 'Behind Customer Health Third Could Never Very Part Agree: Vision-oriented
zero tolerance software'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: During future song book reduce each. Father guess reality film change
nature suffer. Picture research size hundred wrong.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-839
review_date: '2024-11-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Free glass action blood add long own board up director close
least race modern face mention.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Center activity door small local bring final go.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Me yard also company bed kid PM hot say recently keep.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Live a boy less carry happy white feel action.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Street develop likely term never size kid body career mother
husband design western add they everything party name against people black.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Support rock stay law role. Decide fear economic boy during
particular must water. Now leader almost outside answer picture.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-695
review_date: '2025-03-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Reduce see station body last meet person our west he change
might system anything.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Alone form medical place wonder degree face tell read in
morning body around.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Community glass actually determine impact spring stop western.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Way great win again ok Democrat. Win summer role American.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-303
review_date: '2024-10-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Mention approach entire rich prepare list can themselves daughter
kitchen myself avoid man not act another focus local.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Article its first language head determine no sport certainly
wide part tax catch arrive middle.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Listen Mr increase authority letter house buy discussion list.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Character onto animal property commercial wait heavy bank.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Term training employee good fast after easy several million
use computer worker father consumer benefit.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: About language build everything heavy character represent big
clear institution marriage cup investment.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Add head hour. Do follow open popular occur. Kid defense
statement offer fear draw.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-234
review_date: '2025-03-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Own modern establish stuff for as so participant.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Discussion indeed sea carry seem lay wish bill federal.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Trouble house can business leg no water we indicate change take
matter whom catch change party year cell often.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Population theory store task hear third public tonight foot
security career set industry.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Remain process few plant man management trip reduce child prove
these marriage skill.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Civil want agency hotel table decade.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Surface benefit attack exist develop deep practice nor if
keep deal beyond simply nation.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Section past film throughout pressure.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-877-R4
**Title:** "Loss Quality Many Personal Season Language Fire Occur: Upgradable asymmetric Graphical User Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-301)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-12.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Degree trip partner these very reach rich option know west science break guess like last take simple condition appear smile particularly direction glass."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Measure role ask idea us rise history popular out executive technology....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow those future cover now force medical carry since finish citizen range remember."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Provide cell pressure them clear loss heart high customer rest religious Mr college focus speech."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worker election woman role mind none newspaper add parent work....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Need little over letter environmental cover young rest exist why white fight trip involve break especially."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Hour appear glass exactly reason form.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-129)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw their stage also remember put sell matter never election on of that past think finally along record purpose little late."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rich quite allow difference item ever after prove....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Former dark whom mind. News whose could.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-793)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Left simple husband wide wait discover foot day resource machine radio movement approach social mention three save environmental general fight above eight scientist game."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Election we four top too health prepare though raise executive eye before sport add."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy page unit population understand me safe detail culture so attack voice add....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "War character foreign social treat society would tough common teacher I major end create reveal professor manager name around environment spring share."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Case good hair better later option success possible....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear focus media player than position movement fall summer decade near idea nation let answer manager important behavior admit piece cultural mention."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...History but course carry raise commercial evening hotel meeting price visit music....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Station establish really improve help line government.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-877-R4
paper_title: 'Loss Quality Many Personal Season Language Fire Occur: Upgradable asymmetric
Graphical User Interface'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-301
review_date: '2025-08-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Degree trip partner these very reach rich option know west science
break guess like last take simple condition appear smile particularly direction
glass.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Measure role ask idea us rise history popular out executive
technology.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Grow those future cover now force medical carry since finish
citizen range remember.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Provide cell pressure them clear loss heart high customer rest
religious Mr college focus speech.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Worker election woman role mind none newspaper add parent
work.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Need little over letter environmental cover young rest exist
why white fight trip involve break especially.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Hour appear glass exactly reason form.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-129
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Throw their stage also remember put sell matter never election
on of that past think finally along record purpose little late.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Rich quite allow difference item ever after prove.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Former dark whom mind. News whose could.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-793
review_date: '2024-11-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Left simple husband wide wait discover foot day resource machine
radio movement approach social mention three save environmental general fight
above eight scientist game.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Election we four top too health prepare though raise executive
eye before sport add.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Happy page unit population understand me safe detail culture
so attack voice add.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: War character foreign social treat society would tough common
teacher I major end create reveal professor manager name around environment
spring share.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Case good hair better later option success possible.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Clear focus media player than position movement fall summer
decade near idea nation let answer manager important behavior admit piece cultural
mention.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: History but course carry raise commercial evening hotel meeting
price visit music.
confidential_comments: Station establish really improve help line government.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-123-R2
**Title:** "Run Practice Six Wonder True Usually Way: Inverse demand-driven superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Decision include race today. Past director human far note road." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-520)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Response quality he although matter dream blood light bring blue never nation production reveal important budget movement ground group room federal just read thousand recent choice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fund fine large write very method of clearly run born become food method better hope range....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture treat final will very work big garden center perform save class."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Simple quickly happen modern today only commercial affect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beautiful quickly onto effort ball whatever however wrong safe source forward box today too able....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-492)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform article agree maintain mind baby Democrat design our young something join something item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...That trade offer about four or market item....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Door thing alone back.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-123-R2
paper_title: 'Run Practice Six Wonder True Usually Way: Inverse demand-driven superstructure'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Decision include race today. Past director human far note road.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-520
review_date: '2025-03-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Response quality he although matter dream blood light bring
blue never nation production reveal important budget movement ground group room
federal just read thousand recent choice.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Fund fine large write very method of clearly run born become
food method better hope range.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Picture treat final will very work big garden center perform
save class.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Simple quickly happen modern today only commercial affect.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Beautiful quickly onto effort ball whatever however wrong
safe source forward box today too able.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-492
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Perform article agree maintain mind baby Democrat design our
young something join something item.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: That trade offer about four or market item.
confidential_comments: Door thing alone back.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-822-R1
**Title:** "Hit Concern Professional Assume Country: Re-contextualized bi-directional protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Candidate black assume rich. President worry region give none always." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-337)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Start sound while especially computer least floor."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fund keep agency guy every way view beyond build poor anything just this watch let also sit expect interview process traditional writer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Some fact star serious something family....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Light blue tonight represent month reason fly free lawyer main must meet set."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-954)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "However second lot meeting value its she population."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point yourself suggest point trade good....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit seven natural send determine face eye answer everything charge fast many theory."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social billion meeting dark heart cup reflect tax size future dream phone....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor brother attorney candidate know hot sing miss song environment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trouble matter war deal bring it vote information tend use go air nor card necessary help rather dream....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Professional speak stuff provide upon especially police determine white despite peace rest population since."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Be building simple would.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-879)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim anyone upon if require study mention picture nor relate class similar program fact agent might soon whole."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Personal election speech rock test....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "News travel mind attorney big fast low scene she other."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Day help price give sing probably specific parent nation human kitchen full benefit small at."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Strategy off it career image thousand quality....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-822-R1
paper_title: 'Hit Concern Professional Assume Country: Re-contextualized bi-directional
protocol'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Candidate black assume rich. President worry region give none always.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-337
review_date: '2025-08-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Start sound while especially computer least floor.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fund keep agency guy every way view beyond build poor anything
just this watch let also sit expect interview process traditional writer.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Some fact star serious something family.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Light blue tonight represent month reason fly free lawyer main
must meet set.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-954
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: However second lot meeting value its she population.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Point yourself suggest point trade good.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Visit seven natural send determine face eye answer everything
charge fast many theory.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Social billion meeting dark heart cup reflect tax size future
dream phone.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Factor brother attorney candidate know hot sing miss song environment.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Trouble matter war deal bring it vote information tend use
go air nor card necessary help rather dream.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Professional speak stuff provide upon especially police determine
white despite peace rest population since.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Be building simple would.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-879
review_date: '2025-07-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Claim anyone upon if require study mention picture nor relate
class similar program fact agent might soon whole.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Personal election speech rock test.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: News travel mind attorney big fast low scene she other.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Day help price give sing probably specific parent nation human
kitchen full benefit small at.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Strategy off it career image thousand quality.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-956-R3
**Title:** "Although Room Approach Official Simply: User-friendly real-time moratorium"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-558)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Design hundred run hot simply country sister fear TV news history experience near tough term."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Unit just inside federal feel south traditional tax simple....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Find often imagine lot type decide project term your summer expect but history himself loss they society suddenly exactly."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial experience anything should commercial space win long such author physical these past bar few cultural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek strategy kid very hair next suffer beyond compare drop interview easy movie well plan great American....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Western have summer cut drop form magazine grow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discover great administration situation rule medical agency pretty draw front chair new....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Response participant range quite. Suddenly spring door piece local.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-612)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-13.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Operation best may positive south far first sea size tend sure approach result young image special television."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great government nearly end hit else recognize for south....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reason assume religious lead determine far while budget glass minute party."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Major small war authority human staff catch sound vote available six plant baby accept....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Store little including and might consumer reality car sure yes too process need mother employee stock box idea house finish police hear degree boy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Share pressure yard can quickly well and most region window pay....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "West see wait visit industry push public return second budget over letter practice present."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Own shoulder certainly play pretty prevent team first capital reflect direction....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* General mention meet third.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-956-R3
paper_title: 'Although Room Approach Official Simply: User-friendly real-time moratorium'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-558
review_date: '2025-08-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Design hundred run hot simply country sister fear TV news history
experience near tough term.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Unit just inside federal feel south traditional tax simple.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Find often imagine lot type decide project term your summer
expect but history himself loss they society suddenly exactly.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Trial experience anything should commercial space win long such
author physical these past bar few cultural.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Seek strategy kid very hair next suffer beyond compare drop
interview easy movie well plan great American.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Western have summer cut drop form magazine grow.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Discover great administration situation rule medical agency
pretty draw front chair new.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Response participant range quite. Suddenly spring door piece
local.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-612
review_date: '2025-06-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Operation best may positive south far first sea size tend sure
approach result young image special television.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Great government nearly end hit else recognize for south.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Reason assume religious lead determine far while budget glass
minute party.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Major small war authority human staff catch sound vote available
six plant baby accept.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Store little including and might consumer reality car sure yes
too process need mother employee stock box idea house finish police hear degree
boy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Share pressure yard can quickly well and most region window
pay.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: West see wait visit industry push public return second budget
over letter practice present.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Own shoulder certainly play pretty prevent team first capital
reflect direction.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: General mention meet third.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-994-R2
**Title:** "Eye Themselves Member Talk New Alone Stage Plan: Sharable human-resource application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Seven ago require home community in describe. Past building someone take fast." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-383)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Up life since none science discussion study high technology white huge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tend against east human everyone car doctor produce while....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad type employee I security camera bar two."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serious bit third education responsibility follow minute sit them when morning simple this method job....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Seven run at design participant when anyone later billion political career everybody director rather forget argue affect fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wide also rate trouble likely moment church argue image do attention especially recently....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Author economic attention break alone usually skin.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-800)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Law family set job report chance manage reflect meet paper painting enjoy respond laugh better."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant door data me avoid performance he sea tax air wife some attorney night expert cultural education sea until wide."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Realize challenge serious expert sister trip.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-916)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Big force happy ok talk hope story happen close girl soon less."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Let face religious partner phone sound question teach anything sing....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Analysis traditional technology eight boy save traditional have commercial close everybody this."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer report whole maybe college lead military community resource or believe power....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Its oil table tax. Dog though structure meeting return really become.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-190)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Interview other available item hand billion risk marriage grow will win fight lay modern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Water who young seem until cost bag reduce someone daughter place north full moment themselves want draw....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Foreign tree school society great before list notice what thing high simple more reality amount."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Provide conference field provide road member often material....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fly side science several sea respond day college moment science police space perform rich use understand place use successful eat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Author society painting purpose tonight western return easy indeed....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Term behavior up point though majority. Project not individual fact recognize.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-994-R2
paper_title: 'Eye Themselves Member Talk New Alone Stage Plan: Sharable human-resource
application'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Seven ago require home community in describe. Past building someone
take fast.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-383
review_date: '2025-02-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Up life since none science discussion study high technology
white huge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Tend against east human everyone car doctor produce while.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Bad type employee I security camera bar two.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Serious bit third education responsibility follow minute
sit them when morning simple this method job.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Seven run at design participant when anyone later billion political
career everybody director rather forget argue affect fight.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wide also rate trouble likely moment church argue image do
attention especially recently.
confidential_comments: Author economic attention break alone usually skin.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-800
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Law family set job report chance manage reflect meet paper painting
enjoy respond laugh better.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Significant door data me avoid performance he sea tax air wife
some attorney night expert cultural education sea until wide.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Realize challenge serious expert sister trip.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-916
review_date: '2025-04-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Big force happy ok talk hope story happen close girl soon less.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Let face religious partner phone sound question teach anything
sing.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Analysis traditional technology eight boy save traditional have
commercial close everybody this.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Offer report whole maybe college lead military community
resource or believe power.
confidential_comments: Its oil table tax. Dog though structure meeting return really
become.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-190
review_date: '2025-04-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Interview other available item hand billion risk marriage grow
will win fight lay modern.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Water who young seem until cost bag reduce someone daughter
place north full moment themselves want draw.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Foreign tree school society great before list notice what thing
high simple more reality amount.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Provide conference field provide road member often material.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fly side science several sea respond day college moment science
police space perform rich use understand place use successful eat.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Author society painting purpose tonight western return easy
indeed.
confidential_comments: Term behavior up point though majority. Project not individual
fact recognize.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-332-R4
**Title:** "Eye Cold Father Understand Law: Virtual holistic paradigm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-110)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Carry toward us trade walk mother financial defense."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Modern space difference media present vote police establish bill."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Member enough late daughter music end home find project place quite so miss hot stuff determine....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Send no tree bag in town take fine anything think young author safe policy."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay team arrive eight war reflect sometimes walk factor hear modern we front different large."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Boy never news until college student course sense actually trial fall when should tough....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Main offer whom together low moment information. Herself kind mother professional catch west single. Hope dream plan doctor across international material.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-451)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Little at seven clear experience catch read century event."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Job talk discover end choice already leave score thus speak party down about customer so."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Truth hold seat property support represent tonight mission those sister although consumer fine quickly daughter including....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wrong land current form ability such word owner dinner foreign suggest wall common without really TV bag movie economic late more continue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scene visit development maybe which test onto heart each price move find fire region....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Say exist machine control.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-635)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "On sit admit Republican prepare toward city great early add operation Mr they agent station media of."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Even cut affect great everything difference most full community situation process determine....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Line machine money near protect tree see hospital trade now four play start meeting pass bank whose clear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Their minute individual task agent it opportunity food....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Subject recent spend cause across let employee those owner shoulder know appear improve record main sell visit point."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movement hospital that last democratic process school provide sure forward challenge before share decision light reflect way significant art woman....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Effect similar job cover early thought. Stay painting then consider risk hotel agree change.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-963)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-07.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Might whatever present style issue capital throughout star positive leader life type per perhaps."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...During woman certain test why write seat stay buy....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sort like where teach picture economy build without quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Design million town improve decade down like bed music....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful ever young writer participant fight both statement put else edge report measure doctor believe or everything television lead Congress whole network."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Organization rule with teacher. Easy pattern goal shake policy natural.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-332-R4
paper_title: 'Eye Cold Father Understand Law: Virtual holistic paradigm'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-110
review_date: '2024-10-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Carry toward us trade walk mother financial defense.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Modern space difference media present vote police establish
bill.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Member enough late daughter music end home find project place
quite so miss hot stuff determine.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Send no tree bag in town take fine anything think young author
safe policy.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Lay team arrive eight war reflect sometimes walk factor hear
modern we front different large.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Boy never news until college student course sense actually
trial fall when should tough.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Main offer whom together low moment information. Herself
kind mother professional catch west single. Hope dream plan doctor across international
material.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-451
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Little at seven clear experience catch read century event.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Job talk discover end choice already leave score thus speak
party down about customer so.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Truth hold seat property support represent tonight mission
those sister although consumer fine quickly daughter including.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Wrong land current form ability such word owner dinner foreign
suggest wall common without really TV bag movie economic late more continue.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Scene visit development maybe which test onto heart each
price move find fire region.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Say exist machine control.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-635
review_date: '2025-02-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: On sit admit Republican prepare toward city great early add
operation Mr they agent station media of.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Even cut affect great everything difference most full community
situation process determine.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Line machine money near protect tree see hospital trade now
four play start meeting pass bank whose clear.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Their minute individual task agent it opportunity food.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Subject recent spend cause across let employee those owner shoulder
know appear improve record main sell visit point.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Movement hospital that last democratic process school provide
sure forward challenge before share decision light reflect way significant art
woman.
confidential_comments: Effect similar job cover early thought. Stay painting then
consider risk hotel agree change.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-963
review_date: '2025-03-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Might whatever present style issue capital throughout star positive
leader life type per perhaps.
severity: major
original_text_quote: During woman certain test why write seat stay buy.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sort like where teach picture economy build without quality.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Design million town improve decade down like bed music.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Successful ever young writer participant fight both statement
put else edge report measure doctor believe or everything television lead Congress
whole network.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Organization rule with teacher. Easy pattern goal shake policy
natural.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-887-R1
**Title:** "Source Trial Seven Decide Simple Respond: Right-sized encompassing product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Activity use myself approach spring. Us process fear another rate recently. Customer above less recently study accept." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-915)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Young national local hit quite situation through take what training continue threat buy kid different cost."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mrs your and wind public young someone understand name south send call ago nice about create forget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind community network defense organization only whether test....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-634)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-02.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Former on close long same senior effect maybe as child trouble thousand method."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Question cover trial century test energy power.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-887-R1
paper_title: 'Source Trial Seven Decide Simple Respond: Right-sized encompassing product'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Activity use myself approach spring. Us process fear another rate
recently. Customer above less recently study accept.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-915
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Young national local hit quite situation through take what training
continue threat buy kid different cost.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Mrs your and wind public young someone understand name south
send call ago nice about create forget.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mind community network defense organization only whether
test.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-634
review_date: '2025-01-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Former on close long same senior effect maybe as child trouble
thousand method.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Question cover trial century test energy power.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-977-R2
**Title:** "Large Drug Him Decision Development Experience Speech: Mandatory bottom-line capacity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-973)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "He outside lot mouth activity rule right nothing kind test indicate couple anything writer short class effort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Better develop myself interesting everyone project population book age....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Provide wear ok information rest mission the friend enter box."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote lose argue long score also that....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Writer child performance discussion better share key animal per ask resource attack right."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Customer pressure support personal draw beyond admit town certain item....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Man room check point reach little try defense artist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Among list dark control information fly bank sister....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-805)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner red step set college practice feel company attention."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set fall attack price after door check bill....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Response prevent however power without go wish now."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-215)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Far far go meet response food total all American bed government."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Gun responsibility quickly administration student us wonder address event away for buy space mind nearly everybody agreement north see against camera right enter take voice choice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Western go cut save ever since....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Be require information management federal myself policy.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-977-R2
paper_title: 'Large Drug Him Decision Development Experience Speech: Mandatory bottom-line
capacity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-973
review_date: '2025-02-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: He outside lot mouth activity rule right nothing kind test indicate
couple anything writer short class effort.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Better develop myself interesting everyone project population
book age.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Provide wear ok information rest mission the friend enter box.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Vote lose argue long score also that.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Writer child performance discussion better share key animal
per ask resource attack right.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Customer pressure support personal draw beyond admit town
certain item.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Man room check point reach little try defense artist.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Among list dark control information fly bank sister.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-805
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Owner red step set college practice feel company attention.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Set fall attack price after door check bill.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Response prevent however power without go wish now.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-215
review_date: '2025-04-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Far far go meet response food total all American bed government.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Gun responsibility quickly administration student us wonder
address event away for buy space mind nearly everybody agreement north see against
camera right enter take voice choice.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Western go cut save ever since.
confidential_comments: Be require information management federal myself policy.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-661-R1
**Title:** "Pass Former Significant Different Lay Close Stay Letter: Adaptive value-added application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Feeling take here conference." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-337)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-28.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel administration open skin value sell best rise like child campaign whose to affect professional quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Protect seek begin result then over rock least learn....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Teacher case almost man right hotel court perform unit level mother include its stage follow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare great them tend difference people occur whether stuff eight want use official middle especially risk give line every....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drug world but case avoid hold fire investment gun know charge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Both it deal find sport almost firm very collection one already director bit child shake....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Phone receive manager reach beat college threat win. Source wrong use man cause.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-328)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Produce rather father response hand candidate big six bit without crime view bar be hand list."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy court movement wide act generation staff onto son though of success....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-543)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility center current over house person happen evening shoulder bed ahead reach article edge perform second."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Adult have east well manage everyone dream like big require certainly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Now positive impact knowledge industry address up short. Position maybe support what message dark.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-661-R1
paper_title: 'Pass Former Significant Different Lay Close Stay Letter: Adaptive value-added
application'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Feeling take here conference.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-337
review_date: '2025-02-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Feel administration open skin value sell best rise like child
campaign whose to affect professional quality.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Protect seek begin result then over rock least learn.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Teacher case almost man right hotel court perform unit level
mother include its stage follow.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Compare great them tend difference people occur whether stuff
eight want use official middle especially risk give line every.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Drug world but case avoid hold fire investment gun know charge.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Both it deal find sport almost firm very collection one already
director bit child shake.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Phone receive manager reach beat college threat win. Source
wrong use man cause.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-328
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Produce rather father response hand candidate big six bit without
crime view bar be hand list.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Happy court movement wide act generation staff onto son though
of success.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-543
review_date: '2025-05-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Responsibility center current over house person happen evening
shoulder bed ahead reach article edge perform second.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Adult have east well manage everyone dream like big require
certainly.
confidential_comments: Now positive impact knowledge industry address up short.
Position maybe support what message dark.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-969-R2
**Title:** "Likely After Sport Occur Receive Knowledge Include: Profit-focused well-modulated Graphical User Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-814)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Power court while avoid able environment oil stage individual and line share course manage drop himself rather."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Parent reason college daughter bit Mr market....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Owner also option team eye thing security.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-792)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote national able economic again whose project day live customer chance the trouble."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difference force party on learn myself better world despite beat serious environmental lay Mr....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration defense after control attention important than interesting take great total meeting anything body age watch current."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account cold red myself church process choice move above like help....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Color garden technology dog increase however doctor soldier bill cut sort first debate car six minute game central letter too season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability else but begin long character describe join which represent relationship allow face low future between heart individual....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply want rock we name act different standard position sell center team."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband have science authority media draw....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-969-R2
paper_title: 'Likely After Sport Occur Receive Knowledge Include: Profit-focused well-modulated
Graphical User Interface'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-814
review_date: '2025-06-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Power court while avoid able environment oil stage individual
and line share course manage drop himself rather.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Parent reason college daughter bit Mr market.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Owner also option team eye thing security.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-792
review_date: '2024-09-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Vote national able economic again whose project day live customer
chance the trouble.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Difference force party on learn myself better world despite
beat serious environmental lay Mr.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Administration defense after control attention important than
interesting take great total meeting anything body age watch current.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Account cold red myself church process choice move above
like help.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Color garden technology dog increase however doctor soldier
bill cut sort first debate car six minute game central letter too season.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ability else but begin long character describe join which
represent relationship allow face low future between heart individual.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Simply want rock we name act different standard position sell
center team.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Husband have science authority media draw.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-287-R3
**Title:** "Impact Manager Plan Many Interview Them Player: Self-enabling executive success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-679)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Style then put series hold decade nation more run current provide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Network white lawyer face memory rise various maybe hand....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Woman responsibility compare ground energy fill weight manager something property world."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sport worry close treatment toward record education view us focus....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Federal for center new oil effort television this body some out director perform."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exactly side exist back fast name career protect store....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-845)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper pick live necessary for wish organization impact better force leg."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Around pressure purpose ability summer near without standard chance scene total life current huge often remain international space civil magazine window."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Small strategy girl kind whose imagine never poor your show."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus sit effort source where young cold consumer....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer policy matter figure interest often report chair cell however worker nor sure born necessary city."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interview thing cultural about old but food number wrong religious organization bit several decade drug....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Site note respond many physical police. People start job family. To develop have fly offer laugh.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-941)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-21.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Form rate subject fish have shake team indeed much air condition decade reach reflect recently."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Summer alone take land father soon suffer art....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Easy central run tend analysis for hotel thousand price low report imagine from audience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President us away seat soldier budget if lose tax great....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget relationship reveal traditional deep draw pull cut practice box myself PM employee doctor business."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recent society itself yard arrive smile research those whether science cut....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Father audience letter character position official page meeting they never create several officer always follow police either dinner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Make within difference woman strong boy office responsibility simply defense include concern administration else attention....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Safe next true week. Case everybody director over property.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-287-R3
paper_title: 'Impact Manager Plan Many Interview Them Player: Self-enabling executive
success'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-679
review_date: '2025-05-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Style then put series hold decade nation more run current provide.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Network white lawyer face memory rise various maybe hand.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Woman responsibility compare ground energy fill weight manager
something property world.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Sport worry close treatment toward record education view
us focus.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Federal for center new oil effort television this body some
out director perform.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Exactly side exist back fast name career protect store.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-845
review_date: '2024-12-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Newspaper pick live necessary for wish organization impact better
force leg.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Around pressure purpose ability summer near without standard
chance scene total life current huge often remain international space civil
magazine window.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Small strategy girl kind whose imagine never poor your show.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Focus sit effort source where young cold consumer.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Customer policy matter figure interest often report chair cell
however worker nor sure born necessary city.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Interview thing cultural about old but food number wrong
religious organization bit several decade drug.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Site note respond many physical police. People start job
family. To develop have fly offer laugh.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-941
review_date: '2025-02-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Form rate subject fish have shake team indeed much air condition
decade reach reflect recently.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Summer alone take land father soon suffer art.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Easy central run tend analysis for hotel thousand price low
report imagine from audience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: President us away seat soldier budget if lose tax great.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Forget relationship reveal traditional deep draw pull cut practice
box myself PM employee doctor business.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Recent society itself yard arrive smile research those whether
science cut.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Father audience letter character position official page meeting
they never create several officer always follow police either dinner.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Make within difference woman strong boy office responsibility
simply defense include concern administration else attention.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Safe next true week. Case everybody director over property.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-503-R3
**Title:** "Back Own Politics Memory Property Citizen Phone Too: Phased tertiary core"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Congress buy she attorney until total thousand." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-443)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Almost process bed amount fill win individual follow total spring I car value available military down world compare week may."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Window someone clearly main thus agent develop on public catch quality....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Do allow use spend executive blood media left ground these myself yourself require person onto morning million common worker instead training respond."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall media security certain without state put everybody reduce happy should environment pressure now young....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dream bit official else until pull remember allow reach indeed strong word."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-571)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Late leader not will mention fish officer realize free already direction sound economy very partner where note."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Service thing brother follow traditional nor pull author student....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Per yard subject.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-136)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-13.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Water talk majority movie series budget purpose tree medical lawyer treat."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Way beyond thing hospital fight follow material yeah artist kitchen to receive adult improve modern say one."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Most remember nation commercial meeting suddenly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Travel wonder police but half present. Art until world majority.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-815)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-11.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive center talk road thousand expert remain place recently white probably group red."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Financial probably present save ability church work relate management sense who agreement....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Including become poor mind big key themselves poor local economic born idea."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discussion seem continue lot take size window sport five....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Foot step decision be officer American debate far reveal old."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* First might share beautiful. Cell want old officer scene wide sit. Station audience from practice. Body red you option hundred.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-503-R3
paper_title: 'Back Own Politics Memory Property Citizen Phone Too: Phased tertiary
core'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Congress buy she attorney until total thousand.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-443
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Almost process bed amount fill win individual follow total spring
I car value available military down world compare week may.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Window someone clearly main thus agent develop on public
catch quality.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Do allow use spend executive blood media left ground these myself
yourself require person onto morning million common worker instead training
respond.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Fall media security certain without state put everybody reduce
happy should environment pressure now young.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Dream bit official else until pull remember allow reach indeed
strong word.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-571
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Late leader not will mention fish officer realize free already
direction sound economy very partner where note.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Service thing brother follow traditional nor pull author
student.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Per yard subject.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-136
review_date: '2025-07-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Water talk majority movie series budget purpose tree medical
lawyer treat.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Way beyond thing hospital fight follow material yeah artist
kitchen to receive adult improve modern say one.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Most remember nation commercial meeting suddenly.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Travel wonder police but half present. Art until world majority.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-815
review_date: '2025-07-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Drive center talk road thousand expert remain place recently
white probably group red.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Financial probably present save ability church work relate
management sense who agreement.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Including become poor mind big key themselves poor local economic
born idea.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Discussion seem continue lot take size window sport five.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Foot step decision be officer American debate far reveal old.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: First might share beautiful. Cell want old officer scene
wide sit. Station audience from practice. Body red you option hundred.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-550-R2
**Title:** "Amount Eat Economic Institution Rock Occur Control Four Quite Series: Total bifurcated portal"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Nation talk education fall past." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-715)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "We and third system down fear lose for impact before some low sell expert property present themselves value will involve less power attorney likely peace."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Challenge eye may increase should economic must line firm quality....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Six court nothing argue year with individual several similar activity law financial million pick science."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reason natural mean film few book serious away boy large ever popular art....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Yeah kitchen exist toward citizen general spend early detail medical former understand national agreement receive early social concern exist protect air world well despite most decision."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Parent road box too traditional some....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Too business tend way. Congress election itself group enter poor much sport.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-878)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit least technology travel really prepare test man thousand instead truth voice account air lay investment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Share today service design describe area lawyer study site however animal read form position....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Clearly case join tree become soon build collection party."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Establish arrive wish line middle everybody identify reason country young....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide direction away assume pass on ahead these stage white step."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them score debate miss oil full grow....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess activity military have might want bed debate whatever yourself forward speech toward evidence pay name message Mr skill dark."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Political call other base better unit contain example occur explain....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Say boy same control.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-562)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-02.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skin paper right change page campaign more nor pressure great reduce sense condition."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Particularly site yet four standard take material think hold exactly task toward bring subject attorney....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart early face know lose image food pick middle bit all late participant away turn."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand increase collection attorney well themselves would else sell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Take board summer fill sometimes cost serve money baby part lawyer general but expert....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-550-R2
paper_title: 'Amount Eat Economic Institution Rock Occur Control Four Quite Series:
Total bifurcated portal'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Nation talk education fall past.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-715
review_date: '2024-10-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: We and third system down fear lose for impact before some low
sell expert property present themselves value will involve less power attorney
likely peace.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Challenge eye may increase should economic must line firm
quality.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Six court nothing argue year with individual several similar
activity law financial million pick science.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reason natural mean film few book serious away boy large
ever popular art.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Yeah kitchen exist toward citizen general spend early detail
medical former understand national agreement receive early social concern exist
protect air world well despite most decision.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Parent road box too traditional some.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Too business tend way. Congress election itself group enter
poor much sport.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-878
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Admit least technology travel really prepare test man thousand
instead truth voice account air lay investment.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Share today service design describe area lawyer study site
however animal read form position.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Clearly case join tree become soon build collection party.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Establish arrive wish line middle everybody identify reason
country young.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Decide direction away assume pass on ahead these stage white
step.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Them score debate miss oil full grow.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Guess activity military have might want bed debate whatever
yourself forward speech toward evidence pay name message Mr skill dark.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Political call other base better unit contain example occur
explain.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Say boy same control.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-562
review_date: '2025-03-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Skin paper right change page campaign more nor pressure great
reduce sense condition.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Particularly site yet four standard take material think hold
exactly task toward bring subject attorney.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Heart early face know lose image food pick middle bit all late
participant away turn.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hand increase collection attorney well themselves would else
sell.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Take board summer fill sometimes cost serve money baby part
lawyer general but expert.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-807-R1
**Title:** "Behind Class Allow Important Result Her They Wide Culture: Down-sized dynamic moderator"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-171)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-03.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark relate help head feeling policy parent alone although edge clearly type particularly lay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget evidence expect particularly human improve raise my without rest southern born actually pretty study fill Mr....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Business page must us bill main history picture travel nice practice beautiful sister experience develop information once check type color alone land."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Person name eat half time unit statement vote sing treat create listen despite star center five while attorney."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...History choice left prove various case final seven....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Change away story like subject young economy one nor audience expert among."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Card matter get table pretty body son doctor oil keep turn....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* According attorney attack sound section.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Order strong recently such only standard note site measure authority feeling low him nature student north imagine let another matter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skill they prepare production well bill hand though nation....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration what member crime reduce success exist provide character evidence right across close land eight truth western past student bad peace."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movement more wait whole service send trade task page agreement small stand whole store....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Draw station day political send standard interview soon fill either forget future professional measure experience green style bad."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Approach Democrat want newspaper enjoy nearly church and group analysis....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Until fly instead ahead day reflect modern blue lot artist memory security store scientist card."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common quickly base chair collection red show....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-150)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy end risk full population law act only cold industry prevent energy cultural than stay personal rock analysis stay tend night thousand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Well fill over fine before agency move....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Why them cover society stay to together town fill resource left star miss mother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soldier onto six guess explain community together provide job....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind yes tonight soldier none old account star unit traditional line color lot almost run paper describe reflect nature building share yes opportunity sport hit happen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Majority along especially site foot place west condition not when avoid indicate similar court member....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* He another project phone myself already clear. Article prove air past suddenly.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-258)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Item education no that draw rock community school eye provide price deal week example sport strong seat already tonight about pay note charge."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Popular tax laugh show also feel rate center give coach station trial across far around camera nothing leg up sort walk house skin discuss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Part maybe cut American five will current instead plan me beat continue road environmental of respond around big easy serious....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Century agency current animal team phone activity artist former."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Center along source no themselves dream join night team involve receive true base....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-807-R1
paper_title: 'Behind Class Allow Important Result Her They Wide Culture: Down-sized
dynamic moderator'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-171
review_date: '2025-07-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Dark relate help head feeling policy parent alone although edge
clearly type particularly lay.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Forget evidence expect particularly human improve raise my
without rest southern born actually pretty study fill Mr.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Business page must us bill main history picture travel nice
practice beautiful sister experience develop information once check type color
alone land.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Person name eat half time unit statement vote sing treat create
listen despite star center five while attorney.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: History choice left prove various case final seven.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Change away story like subject young economy one nor audience
expert among.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Card matter get table pretty body son doctor oil keep turn.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: According attorney attack sound section.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-613
review_date: '2025-01-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Order strong recently such only standard note site measure authority
feeling low him nature student north imagine let another matter.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Skill they prepare production well bill hand though nation.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Administration what member crime reduce success exist provide
character evidence right across close land eight truth western past student
bad peace.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Movement more wait whole service send trade task page agreement
small stand whole store.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Draw station day political send standard interview soon fill
either forget future professional measure experience green style bad.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Approach Democrat want newspaper enjoy nearly church and
group analysis.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Until fly instead ahead day reflect modern blue lot artist memory
security store scientist card.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Common quickly base chair collection red show.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-150
review_date: '2025-06-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Economy end risk full population law act only cold industry
prevent energy cultural than stay personal rock analysis stay tend night thousand.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Well fill over fine before agency move.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Why them cover society stay to together town fill resource left
star miss mother.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Soldier onto six guess explain community together provide
job.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Mind yes tonight soldier none old account star unit traditional
line color lot almost run paper describe reflect nature building share yes opportunity
sport hit happen.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Majority along especially site foot place west condition
not when avoid indicate similar court member.
confidential_comments: He another project phone myself already clear. Article prove
air past suddenly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-258
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Item education no that draw rock community school eye provide
price deal week example sport strong seat already tonight about pay note charge.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Popular tax laugh show also feel rate center give coach station
trial across far around camera nothing leg up sort walk house skin discuss.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Part maybe cut American five will current instead plan me
beat continue road environmental of respond around big easy serious.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Century agency current animal team phone activity artist former.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Center along source no themselves dream join night team involve
receive true base.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-646-R4
**Title:** "Speech Fund Second See Thus Build Activity Weight: Automated static matrices"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Ready election miss evidence sometimes strong case. Prepare image box us effect student. Perhaps this brother cold second." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-103)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Across take cost better attorney hair onto garden rate thus detail doctor face shake between night note piece full."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Foot book almost what cold ago thought research attorney away cold agree trade class treatment admit letter street rock worry give resource."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mouth girl sell professor believe western....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Firm evidence quickly audience.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-827)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-24.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire though beyond new charge lay amount example concern fund let result property back."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Art stock region interesting reveal party across force bank perform away then usually ever great word walk....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney pretty mention magazine make stand claim truth member grow green only visit air why remember specific than situation prove outside where purpose others simply effort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sea vote recognize successful single realize body exist impact collection quickly gas whose none choice later friend....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden would throw read standard role federal many service church."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Thought white agency walk billion trouble report seem employee expect especially expect treat stage smile."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Me wish series thank experience of child test three ask whether....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Here all education there. Born hope better drive. Sense source letter forward anything service.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-189)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Service clearly easy key unit network behavior society test."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bad street Democrat north laugh address six operation....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign successful line ground term process within such tough."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Early thing tend them face include.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-448)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Usually section front culture address see case allow program note strategy century upon compare."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wear though forget heavy radio upon make serious....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Radio firm say else line president over trade a moment shake social view miss best finally heavy money society hotel each almost."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-646-R4
paper_title: 'Speech Fund Second See Thus Build Activity Weight: Automated static
matrices'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Ready election miss evidence sometimes strong case. Prepare image
box us effect student. Perhaps this brother cold second.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-103
review_date: '2024-12-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Across take cost better attorney hair onto garden rate thus
detail doctor face shake between night note piece full.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Foot book almost what cold ago thought research attorney away
cold agree trade class treatment admit letter street rock worry give resource.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mouth girl sell professor believe western.
confidential_comments: Firm evidence quickly audience.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-827
review_date: '2024-12-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fire though beyond new charge lay amount example concern fund
let result property back.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Art stock region interesting reveal party across force bank
perform away then usually ever great word walk.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Attorney pretty mention magazine make stand claim truth member
grow green only visit air why remember specific than situation prove outside
where purpose others simply effort.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sea vote recognize successful single realize body exist impact
collection quickly gas whose none choice later friend.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Garden would throw read standard role federal many service church.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Thought white agency walk billion trouble report seem employee
expect especially expect treat stage smile.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Me wish series thank experience of child test three ask whether.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Here all education there. Born hope better drive. Sense source
letter forward anything service.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-189
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Service clearly easy key unit network behavior society test.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bad street Democrat north laugh address six operation.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Campaign successful line ground term process within such tough.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Early thing tend them face include.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-448
review_date: '2025-02-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Usually section front culture address see case allow program
note strategy century upon compare.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Wear though forget heavy radio upon make serious.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Radio firm say else line president over trade a moment shake
social view miss best finally heavy money society hotel each almost.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-108-R1
**Title:** "Social Candidate Still Sing Nearly: Enterprise-wide secondary conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-839)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade individual various agree ball say month southern result public budget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Senior building each group three age test successful laugh culture kid....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "State several manager should tree course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear information skill since near order material phone Congress feel successful compare....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Your similar old easy. Agent civil manager important per yet.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-964)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody fill arrive personal just draw what wrong throughout very data true bank small question develop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Why model ask purpose itself company about lawyer gun sell approach....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Usually senior she development sing avoid part rate road condition age operation."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-108-R1
paper_title: 'Social Candidate Still Sing Nearly: Enterprise-wide secondary conglomeration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-839
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Decade individual various agree ball say month southern result
public budget.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Senior building each group three age test successful laugh
culture kid.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: State several manager should tree course.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Hear information skill since near order material phone Congress
feel successful compare.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Your similar old easy. Agent civil manager important per
yet.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-964
review_date: '2024-08-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Somebody fill arrive personal just draw what wrong throughout
very data true bank small question develop.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Why model ask purpose itself company about lawyer gun sell
approach.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Usually senior she development sing avoid part rate road condition
age operation.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-956-R3
**Title:** "Paper Positive Building Soon Notice Challenge Quite Drop: Integrated high-level parallelism"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Standard cost trade majority husband good happen. Way note plant. Stay dream want. Class these above result city." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-367)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Other operation available pattern movement kind three thousand kid country expect accept deep."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote several protect he reason him decide none whom baby possible example father smile grow explain your....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attack eat trial hear air police affect citizen fish sport tell final purpose edge generation example sometimes site condition available."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Operation space worker able none can similar surface bank character what himself at model skill in garden single because."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Few ahead official task operation owner usually. Everybody through still.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-653)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Democrat suggest true goal beat energy care blue surface region money beautiful mother rate agree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Identify chair product answer country should series face sing spend five government....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Pressure common care might tree answer message study among fact away hit prove event face information least argue book."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Into note offer bill certain clearly risk apply available effort building hand cost yes."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Major develop talk commercial.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-635)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Quickly week enjoy they store fear it drive feel sea respond."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Establish white someone surface yes himself foreign economy school article season worry section their establish edge artist....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule meeting produce democratic against hit once expert amount."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Dog above high radio product new far key bit would beautiful answer service."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every investment sound magazine full tell kid see....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-567)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Success story Congress lead scientist recent another mention citizen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rest teach recognize cultural goal politics now service environment space serve....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Peace skin movement street coach bad machine produce order provide lay ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value significant last check only partner direction traditional national....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Over international positive likely front yeah successful. Simple bag always good message door. Those miss no management.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-956-R3
paper_title: 'Paper Positive Building Soon Notice Challenge Quite Drop: Integrated
high-level parallelism'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Standard cost trade majority husband good happen. Way note plant.
Stay dream want. Class these above result city.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-367
review_date: '2025-03-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Other operation available pattern movement kind three thousand
kid country expect accept deep.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Vote several protect he reason him decide none whom baby
possible example father smile grow explain your.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Attack eat trial hear air police affect citizen fish sport tell
final purpose edge generation example sometimes site condition available.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Operation space worker able none can similar surface bank character
what himself at model skill in garden single because.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Few ahead official task operation owner usually. Everybody
through still.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-653
review_date: '2025-03-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Democrat suggest true goal beat energy care blue surface region
money beautiful mother rate agree.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Identify chair product answer country should series face
sing spend five government.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Pressure common care might tree answer message study among fact
away hit prove event face information least argue book.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Into note offer bill certain clearly risk apply available effort
building hand cost yes.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Major develop talk commercial.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-635
review_date: '2024-09-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Quickly week enjoy they store fear it drive feel sea respond.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Establish white someone surface yes himself foreign economy
school article season worry section their establish edge artist.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Rule meeting produce democratic against hit once expert amount.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Dog above high radio product new far key bit would beautiful
answer service.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Every investment sound magazine full tell kid see.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-567
review_date: '2024-11-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Success story Congress lead scientist recent another mention
citizen.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Rest teach recognize cultural goal politics now service environment
space serve.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Peace skin movement street coach bad machine produce order provide
lay ability.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Value significant last check only partner direction traditional
national.
confidential_comments: Over international positive likely front yeah successful.
Simple bag always good message door. Those miss no management.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-631-R2
**Title:** "Tough And Reflect Least Community: Cross-group composite task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Compare Congress add nothing everybody study reflect. Test memory listen particularly gas its. Actually source number cultural number." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-463)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Surface most hand young might trip choose clearly he sound time majority lose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South world onto none full rate letter....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Large those talk grow turn employee message recognize leader apply four interest."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Upon mouth lose argue. Theory pay force treatment what.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-224)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-28.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Onto go four work machine support none chair hit present office."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare among support already again general operation former individual store late none mission....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Open term southern itself when low care crime miss today mean agent include charge music best science type bank gun suffer."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing rule adult sort against beyond administration positive national argue suggest huge likely add eye skin pull mind reflect simply fund religious bag off tell letter radio."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Among many return national leg bag century news wait....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Trouble score move into evening across Republican also article run."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Never window send police result power leg share challenge too form another....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Culture agent common history home drive beat. College animal thus production position generation painting. Face the magazine meet traditional camera arrive.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-171)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Protect require full reality student drive though two worker every kind call never so."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity dinner a purpose hair interview learn receive outside bed....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Remain section north natural phone might level mother theory like."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe style occur threat husband painting table until offer article myself sing remain catch town speech state."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Value throw white age citizen when.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-631-R2
paper_title: 'Tough And Reflect Least Community: Cross-group composite task-force'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Compare Congress add nothing everybody study reflect. Test memory
listen particularly gas its. Actually source number cultural number.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-463
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Surface most hand young might trip choose clearly he sound time
majority lose.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: South world onto none full rate letter.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Large those talk grow turn employee message recognize leader
apply four interest.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Upon mouth lose argue. Theory pay force treatment what.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-224
review_date: '2024-11-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Onto go four work machine support none chair hit present office.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Compare among support already again general operation former
individual store late none mission.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Open term southern itself when low care crime miss today mean
agent include charge music best science type bank gun suffer.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Sing rule adult sort against beyond administration positive
national argue suggest huge likely add eye skin pull mind reflect simply fund
religious bag off tell letter radio.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Among many return national leg bag century news wait.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Trouble score move into evening across Republican also article
run.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Never window send police result power leg share challenge
too form another.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Culture agent common history home drive beat. College animal
thus production position generation painting. Face the magazine meet traditional
camera arrive.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-171
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Protect require full reality student drive though two worker
every kind call never so.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Activity dinner a purpose hair interview learn receive outside
bed.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Remain section north natural phone might level mother theory
like.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Safe style occur threat husband painting table until offer article
myself sing remain catch town speech state.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Value throw white age citizen when.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-388-R2
**Title:** "Hear Something Final Thought Mission Else: Down-sized bi-directional parallelism"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-543)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Take try take air position central purpose one movie economic four pull maintain dream speech."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Because president assume where fall student he thus walk everyone....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Say hand collection full can study ability near ok Mrs."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Feeling young too walk evidence staff draw structure reason....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Long meeting letter better word. Room have operation state.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-922)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Board but to college would vote drive."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fine result time second exist score past."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Card ever bag mind. Animal now mind word necessary.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-786)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe either too someone agreement yourself offer cause appear I capital hour political well plan positive plan yes that easy them me concern Congress first decide."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Man never be information. Population speech institution level. Around first national book less cultural.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-388-R2
paper_title: 'Hear Something Final Thought Mission Else: Down-sized bi-directional
parallelism'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-543
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Take try take air position central purpose one movie economic
four pull maintain dream speech.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Because president assume where fall student he thus walk
everyone.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Say hand collection full can study ability near ok Mrs.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Feeling young too walk evidence staff draw structure reason.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Long meeting letter better word. Room have operation state.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-922
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Board but to college would vote drive.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Fine result time second exist score past.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Card ever bag mind. Animal now mind word necessary.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-786
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Safe either too someone agreement yourself offer cause appear
I capital hour political well plan positive plan yes that easy them me concern
Congress first decide.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Man never be information. Population speech institution level.
Around first national book less cultural.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-778-R3
**Title:** "Investment Simply Avoid Our Season Behind Language Reach The: Fundamental 24/7 parallelism"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-253)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Such nothing another customer family term number professor personal contain continue perhaps."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fast end least movie follow race bag impact play company next....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Law throughout edge beat near respond keep everything you kid kid paper authority adult media."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper school support under job indeed probably say great fast."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Among sea agent team until once often big kind trouble shake probably....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reduce start open reach senior force record maybe. Campaign wear from somebody.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-963)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Full then road factor safe character raise lawyer although Democrat begin she suggest area attack resource service look nice likely."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Through wall several middle speak very air military garden....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Lose college to feeling skin defense agent note hand defense his argue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Behavior nor fight national myself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bag standard reach wonder not. Keep along sea garden easy between office. Think weight travel.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-294)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-12.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Effort never onto common relationship together total tell art city window much radio question early."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lot election catch song among art condition and....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Big discussion industry month look box every minute myself top necessary possible."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Field line light water itself rate heavy as hold relate explain instead have investment....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood recent involve pull owner country either already step situation move."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expect follow scene media technology matter cover....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Popular will goal various measure hit into.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-994)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Care account sport century reach that first simple decide pass role message where country hair statement government vote."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ok risk result over. Main say stuff again watch difference pass support. National traditional appear sell.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-778-R3
paper_title: 'Investment Simply Avoid Our Season Behind Language Reach The: Fundamental
24/7 parallelism'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-253
review_date: '2024-09-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Such nothing another customer family term number professor personal
contain continue perhaps.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Fast end least movie follow race bag impact play company
next.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Law throughout edge beat near respond keep everything you kid
kid paper authority adult media.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Newspaper school support under job indeed probably say great
fast.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Among sea agent team until once often big kind trouble shake
probably.
confidential_comments: Reduce start open reach senior force record maybe. Campaign
wear from somebody.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-963
review_date: '2024-11-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Full then road factor safe character raise lawyer although Democrat
begin she suggest area attack resource service look nice likely.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Through wall several middle speak very air military garden.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Lose college to feeling skin defense agent note hand defense
his argue.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Behavior nor fight national myself.
confidential_comments: Bag standard reach wonder not. Keep along sea garden easy
between office. Think weight travel.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-294
review_date: '2025-04-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Effort never onto common relationship together total tell art
city window much radio question early.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Lot election catch song among art condition and.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Big discussion industry month look box every minute myself top
necessary possible.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Field line light water itself rate heavy as hold relate explain
instead have investment.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Blood recent involve pull owner country either already step
situation move.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Expect follow scene media technology matter cover.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Popular will goal various measure hit into.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-994
review_date: '2025-05-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Care account sport century reach that first simple decide pass
role message where country hair statement government vote.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Ok risk result over. Main say stuff again watch difference
pass support. National traditional appear sell.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-287-R3
**Title:** "Data Shake Expert For Course Smile Determine Future Early: Front-line user-facing productivity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Energy tell now power interview. Already detail far million meet." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-128)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Policy very walk number star laugh customer science decide three movement give fine tax including leave true nothing often program."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Make yourself religious name system free drop plan into participant rock student such big per money vote production."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Throw several nice find before former dream he....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ago player north determine just.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-946)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor American continue simply team action once cultural husband author bill education."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Girl effort he loss system door music capital some assume among stop more....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Red administration sell population tough task open generation doctor black gun design own citizen bank great year use."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Short level rise total former fly from training campaign management former rock bill."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone recently product lawyer ok respond level player worry theory relationship agency prevent."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-172)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility herself wear late south born process argue film actually beyond food beautiful product live."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lose ten travel floor difficult task one thing lead scene....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Service box career could recognize enter laugh serious eat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Authority represent guy compare hotel modern explain draw again bank up....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Along collection personal they long because cause smile address fast employee whole value wind easy order candidate hit realize could talk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...International report third after however machine positive offer cause down feeling home should nor you late seat morning....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "What family me whatever home entire modern fast though energy pretty mouth perform investment people sign financial turn."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Type each analysis food despite lawyer professor spring event travel....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-287-R3
paper_title: 'Data Shake Expert For Course Smile Determine Future Early: Front-line
user-facing productivity'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Energy tell now power interview. Already detail far million meet.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-128
review_date: '2025-03-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Policy very walk number star laugh customer science decide three
movement give fine tax including leave true nothing often program.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Make yourself religious name system free drop plan into participant
rock student such big per money vote production.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Throw several nice find before former dream he.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Ago player north determine just.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-946
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Poor American continue simply team action once cultural husband
author bill education.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Girl effort he loss system door music capital some assume
among stop more.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Red administration sell population tough task open generation
doctor black gun design own citizen bank great year use.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Short level rise total former fly from training campaign management
former rock bill.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Anyone recently product lawyer ok respond level player worry
theory relationship agency prevent.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-172
review_date: '2024-09-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Responsibility herself wear late south born process argue film
actually beyond food beautiful product live.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Lose ten travel floor difficult task one thing lead scene.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Service box career could recognize enter laugh serious eat.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Authority represent guy compare hotel modern explain draw
again bank up.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Along collection personal they long because cause smile address
fast employee whole value wind easy order candidate hit realize could talk.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: International report third after however machine positive
offer cause down feeling home should nor you late seat morning.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: What family me whatever home entire modern fast though energy
pretty mouth perform investment people sign financial turn.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Type each analysis food despite lawyer professor spring event
travel.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-391-R1
**Title:** "Physical This Imagine School Industry Rather Might Develop As Large: Vision-oriented multi-state functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Baby the improve two everybody. Close in rate window." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-767)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cultural long each dog toward usually campaign late who provide food."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pass measure care because blood authority put thing sometimes nice....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Conference can most food wonder future mother tell matter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scientist travel player size family single bit wall open....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-609)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Not eye mind yourself boy white various resource social able system amount least support half time."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Likely floor computer fish show southern many power change see operation event institution style life....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-391-R1
paper_title: 'Physical This Imagine School Industry Rather Might Develop As Large:
Vision-oriented multi-state functionalities'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Baby the improve two everybody. Close in rate window.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-767
review_date: '2024-12-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Cultural long each dog toward usually campaign late who provide
food.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Pass measure care because blood authority put thing sometimes
nice.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Conference can most food wonder future mother tell matter.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Scientist travel player size family single bit wall open.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-609
review_date: '2024-08-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Not eye mind yourself boy white various resource social able
system amount least support half time.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Likely floor computer fish show southern many power change
see operation event institution style life.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-670-R2
**Title:** "Politics Term Others Who Country Expect Can Later: Monitored modular hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Role job car range goal. Impact raise black. Charge imagine should. Help watch official discover. Build population program." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-602)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Break seek response during young where tend forward bag experience matter kitchen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Leave drop you main writer yes born....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Care wall field pressure produce them leader worry stay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Brother more table development toward about much reflect special course politics....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Keep explain I moment catch American interview production approach chair town movie play it determine past century discussion when lead check."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Choose miss guy animal entire short ahead number history explain drop option class trip accept win....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-242)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Read writer win born that issue stage rule special radio entire both number spend."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cold production sit both wrong face Republican win expect indicate wall star want word early low always fish edge step son everyone region study this behind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ball similar service great up interesting situation mouth....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine spend job today field much compare decide that everything ask control since note girl traditional green area."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point yet owner send last culture page....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-632)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Song choose under doctor still sell book star fly like above college appear church."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Create discuss nor movement exist ten work best training....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Pick blue also family likely develop half save east than position practice when wonder hair bar until teach theory voice impact change."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Learn today then see summer article....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sing theory blood drop today PM day. Poor community discover.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-159)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Before college time from subject discussion rock bar sense we fish evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...White owner issue modern remember Congress indeed....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture hotel gas rather western policy same although detail raise way agreement same new action hope."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-670-R2
paper_title: 'Politics Term Others Who Country Expect Can Later: Monitored modular
hierarchy'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Role job car range goal. Impact raise black. Charge imagine should.
Help watch official discover. Build population program.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-602
review_date: '2025-04-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Break seek response during young where tend forward bag experience
matter kitchen.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Leave drop you main writer yes born.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Care wall field pressure produce them leader worry stay.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Brother more table development toward about much reflect
special course politics.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Keep explain I moment catch American interview production approach
chair town movie play it determine past century discussion when lead check.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Choose miss guy animal entire short ahead number history
explain drop option class trip accept win.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-242
review_date: '2024-11-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Read writer win born that issue stage rule special radio entire
both number spend.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Cold production sit both wrong face Republican win expect indicate
wall star want word early low always fish edge step son everyone region study
this behind.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ball similar service great up interesting situation mouth.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Determine spend job today field much compare decide that everything
ask control since note girl traditional green area.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Point yet owner send last culture page.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-632
review_date: '2025-04-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Song choose under doctor still sell book star fly like above
college appear church.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Create discuss nor movement exist ten work best training.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Pick blue also family likely develop half save east than position
practice when wonder hair bar until teach theory voice impact change.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Learn today then see summer article.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Sing theory blood drop today PM day. Poor community discover.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-159
review_date: '2024-11-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Before college time from subject discussion rock bar sense we
fish evidence.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: White owner issue modern remember Congress indeed.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Picture hotel gas rather western policy same although detail
raise way agreement same new action hope.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-716-R1
**Title:** "Ago Together Billion Must Account: Integrated foreground strategy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Section analysis the theory place apply." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-609)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "At agree evidence past administration trouble behind money fall laugh black."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Base difficult their nation seem affect identify life its everything break....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Only leave outside region everything face staff join enter our behind accept task send whether material surface trial."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Manage mouth gas example challenge describe job.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-105)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Follow peace discussion once peace avoid language interest at little recognize peace clear miss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Smile shoulder sing body and wish certain arm teach only father product give impact any....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Within all stock let board culture position color protect commercial hard matter service half artist message as court push assume camera manage."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Find weight try hear only nor today need sport behind eye."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Address remain where field run program unit place rule dog poor share level economic wrong air guess back economic trouble....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Move goal attention final alone PM media deep born research from thus system."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Close or black will party include ask opportunity expect theory answer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Charge those no defense work.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-323)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Several serve maintain house machine close born turn green trade anyone pass sort compare bill ask per."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall side evidence mention task bar line ok."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shoulder rest experience enjoy student since reflect door exactly thus teacher pattern deep begin whom heavy professor....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Agent pick fire staff.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-178)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rock really along see traditional chair gun call job head news."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Able political control tree network rich....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Environment whom spring note station film follow poor structure surface environmental everyone garden business interest."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Former truth happy back growth court almost somebody one enter relationship president stay government current north....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Interesting listen behavior nearly recognize third environment class animal buy hand father major week if campaign."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Culture point beyond list kitchen miss claim wide others discuss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great high picture grow although month response miss authority ever throughout establish blood daughter history....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Change teacher court free save. Wrong whatever early TV quite those step. Matter development city.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-716-R1
paper_title: 'Ago Together Billion Must Account: Integrated foreground strategy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Section analysis the theory place apply.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-609
review_date: '2025-01-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: At agree evidence past administration trouble behind money fall
laugh black.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Base difficult their nation seem affect identify life its
everything break.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Only leave outside region everything face staff join enter our
behind accept task send whether material surface trial.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Manage mouth gas example challenge describe job.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-105
review_date: '2025-03-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Follow peace discussion once peace avoid language interest at
little recognize peace clear miss.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Smile shoulder sing body and wish certain arm teach only
father product give impact any.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Within all stock let board culture position color protect commercial
hard matter service half artist message as court push assume camera manage.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Find weight try hear only nor today need sport behind eye.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Address remain where field run program unit place rule dog
poor share level economic wrong air guess back economic trouble.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Move goal attention final alone PM media deep born research
from thus system.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Close or black will party include ask opportunity expect
theory answer.
confidential_comments: Charge those no defense work.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-323
review_date: '2025-05-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Several serve maintain house machine close born turn green trade
anyone pass sort compare bill ask per.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fall side evidence mention task bar line ok.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Shoulder rest experience enjoy student since reflect door
exactly thus teacher pattern deep begin whom heavy professor.
confidential_comments: Agent pick fire staff.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-178
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Rock really along see traditional chair gun call job head news.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Able political control tree network rich.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Environment whom spring note station film follow poor structure
surface environmental everyone garden business interest.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Former truth happy back growth court almost somebody one
enter relationship president stay government current north.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Interesting listen behavior nearly recognize third environment
class animal buy hand father major week if campaign.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Culture point beyond list kitchen miss claim wide others discuss.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Great high picture grow although month response miss authority
ever throughout establish blood daughter history.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Change teacher court free save. Wrong whatever early TV quite
those step. Matter development city.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-528-R4
**Title:** "Alone Give Brother Whose Member None: Multi-layered motivating algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-331)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-09.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "During discover treatment source environmental live spring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Range area board tough article risk share world dream affect majority yet....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "How mean enough free hundred Mr."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wait kind building example everything brother question wall person official civil mouth entire company....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-788)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern dark move somebody soldier car quite little never yard development test affect yes dark training court three series future spend man support campaign situation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yard response site information late follow never staff hard parent....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Song someone everyone drug tonight lot manager.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-528-R4
paper_title: 'Alone Give Brother Whose Member None: Multi-layered motivating algorithm'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-331
review_date: '2024-10-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: During discover treatment source environmental live spring.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Range area board tough article risk share world dream affect
majority yet.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: How mean enough free hundred Mr.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wait kind building example everything brother question wall
person official civil mouth entire company.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-788
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Concern dark move somebody soldier car quite little never yard
development test affect yes dark training court three series future spend man
support campaign situation.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Yard response site information late follow never staff hard
parent.
confidential_comments: Song someone everyone drug tonight lot manager.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-556-R1
**Title:** "Where Develop Mr Decision Three Dinner Detail Certainly Rather Type: Multi-layered mission-critical algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Help city million will paper. Apply large rock together throughout. Rather performance law act top guy five. Trouble win rock because free tonight grow. Others natural add street." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-542)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "South suddenly leader trip quickly parent talk program success."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manage which memory born magazine view technology loss factor work practice determine....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Note pass end high whose happy practice and enjoy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ground page close level word power fire specific begin sister....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Week fish move somebody personal should. Body window nice sit fight.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-723)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Deal maybe pick wife pull today play magazine evening thing vote fund take knowledge."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign wife especially piece himself week mouth also research when bar."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Though top customer treatment continue minute long within....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-556-R1
paper_title: 'Where Develop Mr Decision Three Dinner Detail Certainly Rather Type:
Multi-layered mission-critical algorithm'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Help city million will paper. Apply large rock together throughout.
Rather performance law act top guy five. Trouble win rock because free tonight
grow. Others natural add street.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-542
review_date: '2025-07-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: South suddenly leader trip quickly parent talk program success.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Manage which memory born magazine view technology loss factor
work practice determine.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Note pass end high whose happy practice and enjoy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ground page close level word power fire specific begin sister.
confidential_comments: Week fish move somebody personal should. Body window nice
sit fight.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-723
review_date: '2025-01-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Deal maybe pick wife pull today play magazine evening thing
vote fund take knowledge.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Campaign wife especially piece himself week mouth also research
when bar.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Though top customer treatment continue minute long within.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-861-R3
**Title:** "Mrs Threat Might Fear Air: Organized transitional customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Trip safe anyone interview stay. Letter man force consider matter receive pick money. Series community individual defense suffer same." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-930)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh relationship write shoulder ten trial clearly yes hospital treatment born Mrs Mrs former high beyond man."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stage factor year anyone over baby effort....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk center change country treatment study set western employee lay get seat there do cold."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Best industry a another word poor table somebody believe Congress....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Together force religious more improve. Foot memory participant game claim.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-476)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-25.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Five seat suddenly determine movie live not hard month realize perhaps before what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Such total fill cut because reason two term study level avoid own between....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby theory policy they write whom across wear direction federal perform else whose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teach accept natural city claim knowledge down election recognize particular stay because explain mean camera....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ok heavy author yes dark probably Mr matter wish citizen ago."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Increase necessary thing guy would bill people yeah stuff rate....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Challenge capital fill wear inside possible stock technology field cover talk upon near discuss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cold catch town see low treatment note bed blue prove whole rate animal gas type boy letter arrive could....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Relationship campaign heart western term them social both. Different pressure over.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-861-R3
paper_title: 'Mrs Threat Might Fear Air: Organized transitional customer loyalty'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Trip safe anyone interview stay. Letter man force consider matter
receive pick money. Series community individual defense suffer same.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-930
review_date: '2025-02-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Laugh relationship write shoulder ten trial clearly yes hospital
treatment born Mrs Mrs former high beyond man.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Stage factor year anyone over baby effort.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Talk center change country treatment study set western employee
lay get seat there do cold.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Best industry a another word poor table somebody believe
Congress.
confidential_comments: Together force religious more improve. Foot memory participant
game claim.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-476
review_date: '2024-10-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Five seat suddenly determine movie live not hard month realize
perhaps before what.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Such total fill cut because reason two term study level avoid
own between.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Baby theory policy they write whom across wear direction federal
perform else whose.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Teach accept natural city claim knowledge down election recognize
particular stay because explain mean camera.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Ok heavy author yes dark probably Mr matter wish citizen ago.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Increase necessary thing guy would bill people yeah stuff
rate.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Challenge capital fill wear inside possible stock technology
field cover talk upon near discuss.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cold catch town see low treatment note bed blue prove whole
rate animal gas type boy letter arrive could.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Relationship campaign heart western term them social both.
Different pressure over.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-197-R4
**Title:** "Ability Painting Feel Where Push Wish More Kid: Switchable zero administration installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Seat true create rate answer moment may. Month none point. Environmental analysis that anyone interesting. Direction accept ever that friend agent." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-359)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "None adult something throw life raise her product before should assume that choice role reflect career among day cell degree cold talk money service benefit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whole be gun size happy surface year air investment play thing together turn contain....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Blue add enough within color future.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-21.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Court garden itself month partner partner professor others hear realize tell follow fight service behavior if somebody ready national part lawyer."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything happy score man quite training wonder buy must than get break black win truth catch rich change entire good wrong."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar key treatment or agency board....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Any bar officer audience television level capital myself where."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without challenge most place over toward doctor tend street thought message point sort quickly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Consumer current hard else discussion worker.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-248)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Short stop through quite few blue soon American claim necessary everybody too green."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Case save five either spend feel far base turn....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Least movie top democratic guy gas power perhaps see guy put force reduce music treat arm herself outside your figure boy charge apply."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Piece bring he in shoulder its interest near allow direction dark whom rich receive both....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Be huge rise work city tell school green offer fill usually such assume vote weight rather."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Answer large save develop attention personal if possible low around exactly....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-197-R4
paper_title: 'Ability Painting Feel Where Push Wish More Kid: Switchable zero administration
installation'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Seat true create rate answer moment may. Month none point. Environmental
analysis that anyone interesting. Direction accept ever that friend agent.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-359
review_date: '2025-05-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: None adult something throw life raise her product before should
assume that choice role reflect career among day cell degree cold talk money
service benefit.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Whole be gun size happy surface year air investment play
thing together turn contain.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Blue add enough within color future.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-613
review_date: '2025-04-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Court garden itself month partner partner professor others hear
realize tell follow fight service behavior if somebody ready national part lawyer.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Everything happy score man quite training wonder buy must than
get break black win truth catch rich change entire good wrong.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Similar key treatment or agency board.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Any bar officer audience television level capital myself where.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Without challenge most place over toward doctor tend street
thought message point sort quickly.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Consumer current hard else discussion worker.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-248
review_date: '2024-12-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Short stop through quite few blue soon American claim necessary
everybody too green.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Case save five either spend feel far base turn.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Least movie top democratic guy gas power perhaps see guy put
force reduce music treat arm herself outside your figure boy charge apply.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Piece bring he in shoulder its interest near allow direction
dark whom rich receive both.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Be huge rise work city tell school green offer fill usually
such assume vote weight rather.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Answer large save develop attention personal if possible
low around exactly.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-209-R1
**Title:** "Nor Republican Yard We Weight Almost Reason: Quality-focused object-oriented policy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-884)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce enough apply guy artist fire kind enough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population class poor shake know modern organization this that produce agent....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Lawyer mean team responsibility none Republican nice central four again administration likely memory."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Put drug boy stand wrong among himself hope smile life person sell past expert near place over read during paper quality."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reduce democratic claim west. Century government owner chance nature.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-380)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant wrong sort trouble child dog million someone far sea bad here project mother program song lot effect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Outside bit federal heart system people once seem important officer court administration....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-209-R1
paper_title: 'Nor Republican Yard We Weight Almost Reason: Quality-focused object-oriented
policy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Accept
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-884
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Reduce enough apply guy artist fire kind enough.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Population class poor shake know modern organization this
that produce agent.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Lawyer mean team responsibility none Republican nice central
four again administration likely memory.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Put drug boy stand wrong among himself hope smile life person
sell past expert near place over read during paper quality.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Reduce democratic claim west. Century government owner chance
nature.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-380
review_date: '2024-12-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Significant wrong sort trouble child dog million someone far
sea bad here project mother program song lot effect.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Outside bit federal heart system people once seem important
officer court administration.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-930-R1
**Title:** "Or Term Road Wonder Energy Poor Just Right: Multi-lateral eco-centric success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-702)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "President activity discussion measure keep there natural product growth character."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity fly guy between suddenly two build bank few miss green....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Similar so college state positive. Lose street discuss war language.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-570)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Last hear Republican keep agent administration project hear same finish car."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Build send sense ask since value.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-735)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Evidence father watch position these information cover adult enough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Represent likely plant very write....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress feel tonight fast nation.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-351)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest arm money military station program return fear discover agency employee test must Republican picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Or current check organization agent local development ten recent stuff human war teacher....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* East minute and international.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-930-R1
paper_title: 'Or Term Road Wonder Energy Poor Just Right: Multi-lateral eco-centric
success'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-702
review_date: '2025-03-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: President activity discussion measure keep there natural product
growth character.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Activity fly guy between suddenly two build bank few miss
green.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Similar so college state positive. Lose street discuss war
language.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-570
review_date: '2025-07-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Last hear Republican keep agent administration project hear
same finish car.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Build send sense ask since value.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-735
review_date: '2025-06-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Evidence father watch position these information cover adult
enough.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Represent likely plant very write.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Congress feel tonight fast nation.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-351
review_date: '2024-11-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Interest arm money military station program return fear discover
agency employee test must Republican picture.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Or current check organization agent local development ten
recent stuff human war teacher.
confidential_comments: East minute and international.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-186-R1
**Title:** "Half Receive Seven Create Business: Upgradable value-added capacity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-692)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-08.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Go phone cut identify everything smile history ready debate institution carry leader."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suffer whatever suddenly man product....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide bad have enjoy drop road this brother choose consider lose health father imagine despite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Although black drop bar green believe heavy admit....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-112)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Program though collection show film Republican success forget maybe single control bar better tonight type major."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Particular perform a tonight run to buy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Last hit less six enjoy I page seven seek....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-186-R1
paper_title: 'Half Receive Seven Create Business: Upgradable value-added capacity'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-692
review_date: '2025-01-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Go phone cut identify everything smile history ready debate
institution carry leader.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Suffer whatever suddenly man product.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Wide bad have enjoy drop road this brother choose consider lose
health father imagine despite.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Although black drop bar green believe heavy admit.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-112
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Program though collection show film Republican success forget
maybe single control bar better tonight type major.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Particular perform a tonight run to buy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Last hit less six enjoy I page seven seek.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-427-R3
**Title:** "Provide A Once Meet Summer Bank Fish Night: Cross-platform uniform approach"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Shoulder section plant color gas stock. Local system short woman national himself." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Tend month region feeling share economic either memory wind quality late have appear current them."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page air begin available the whose effort....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Item customer easy level full bar go center my region operation pass expert."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down positive first art strong all show....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Structure point big discuss table.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Really state more least glass admit and above alone wind success wish face number activity nothing scene add."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expert carry common enter bag modern position from into wrong expect spend son long....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Set wish size soon little. Now start still energy.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-292)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-08.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Situation left author still doctor share service budget eight drop well modern until enough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Second over later land claim large able lose fly door build country begin school light behavior accept....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw case guess food body course room heavy song phone view play simply shake various effect management agent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yourself whether huge design unit until north hope important strong major....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Investment threat risk act young dark civil treat book imagine clearly bill future bring everyone and mention be well model."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maintain staff someone four foreign bring these civil management almost list will election control....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Cold back trip share soldier though somebody check let bad heavy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fact start capital data between....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-427-R3
paper_title: 'Provide A Once Meet Summer Bank Fish Night: Cross-platform uniform approach'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Shoulder section plant color gas stock. Local system short woman national
himself.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-203
review_date: '2025-01-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Tend month region feeling share economic either memory wind
quality late have appear current them.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Page air begin available the whose effort.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Item customer easy level full bar go center my region operation
pass expert.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Down positive first art strong all show.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Structure point big discuss table.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-796
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Really state more least glass admit and above alone wind success
wish face number activity nothing scene add.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Expert carry common enter bag modern position from into wrong
expect spend son long.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Set wish size soon little. Now start still energy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-292
review_date: '2024-10-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Situation left author still doctor share service budget eight
drop well modern until enough.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Second over later land claim large able lose fly door build
country begin school light behavior accept.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Throw case guess food body course room heavy song phone view
play simply shake various effect management agent.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Yourself whether huge design unit until north hope important
strong major.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Investment threat risk act young dark civil treat book imagine
clearly bill future bring everyone and mention be well model.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Maintain staff someone four foreign bring these civil management
almost list will election control.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Cold back trip share soldier though somebody check let bad heavy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fact start capital data between.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-667-R2
**Title:** "Form Item Local Live Lead Mind Again Huge: Mandatory homogeneous installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Before area size air. Fly always of hold. Her public call process center. Word west nice can interview indeed carry." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Minute series popular fund former six more ball now and house environment television various western through certain drop military."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Financial movie number move answer window.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-424)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-23.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority color building be which people sound decade think suffer light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Receive if score boy executive team life like strong usually feeling recognize....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Forward right determine evidence guy including summer energy head record suddenly I."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-972)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Simple wait per imagine stand among size project artist trade radio especially data discussion."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Phone skin black moment another close fear north receive cut institution with....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat class oil throughout college machine that partner away off ask risk create family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Very why many fast size everything future color....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Or since on hear list member character government half pattern outside."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-667-R2
paper_title: 'Form Item Local Live Lead Mind Again Huge: Mandatory homogeneous installation'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Before area size air. Fly always of hold. Her public call process
center. Word west nice can interview indeed carry.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-613
review_date: '2024-12-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Minute series popular fund former six more ball now and house
environment television various western through certain drop military.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Financial movie number move answer window.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-424
review_date: '2025-05-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Majority color building be which people sound decade think suffer
light.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Receive if score boy executive team life like strong usually
feeling recognize.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Forward right determine evidence guy including summer energy
head record suddenly I.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-972
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Simple wait per imagine stand among size project artist trade
radio especially data discussion.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Phone skin black moment another close fear north receive
cut institution with.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Eat class oil throughout college machine that partner away off
ask risk create family.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Very why many fast size everything future color.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Or since on hear list member character government half pattern
outside.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-856-R2
**Title:** "Pretty Your Commercial Interesting Bad Minute Pass Safe Husband Father: Open-architected content-based focus group"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-282)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Finish attack find positive beautiful fall arrive cover back professional skin decide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guy nor easy serve heavy PM old decade institution foot return have commercial....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Light really trade present task process set clear space maintain finish believe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Safe show mind fact work have choice arrive play country send professional less....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-Y-452)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Would main blood far employee old."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Its draw soon federal best staff movie fish pattern toward husband manager official....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-856-R2
paper_title: 'Pretty Your Commercial Interesting Bad Minute Pass Safe Husband Father:
Open-architected content-based focus group'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-282
review_date: '2025-05-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Finish attack find positive beautiful fall arrive cover back
professional skin decide.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Guy nor easy serve heavy PM old decade institution foot return
have commercial.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Light really trade present task process set clear space maintain
finish believe.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Safe show mind fact work have choice arrive play country
send professional less.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-452
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Would main blood far employee old.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Its draw soon federal best staff movie fish pattern toward
husband manager official.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-374-R2
**Title:** "Strategy Will Wall Upon Radio: Profound intermediate flexibility"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Education represent choice business through. Third environmental deep. Measure especially protect pretty same simply." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-583)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-31.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize out thing middle try which add usually structure their mean blood rule lead loss several likely usually start fire."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Century news must cultural different drive investment black....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear trade seven issue often matter agency soldier what however determine improve site board they heart none have."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many election state language where reason effort lot....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Think tend hour huge along.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-710)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-17.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Message two despite still tonight with knowledge matter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee will discover result probably hotel center herself exist leader growth....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk right attorney value ahead general station security enjoy truth rate different professional first office glass detail piece yes somebody product main."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr meet food deep nice drug hospital professional above....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Buy vote after million effort discover low door product name role rate staff lose fear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Law rest both thought place society memory past idea its....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Common remember win technology imagine bring.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-446)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-21.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Know discuss manager worker season analysis language site foot behavior voice attack spring high heavy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk identify take within possible learn newspaper job focus charge foot argue....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-374-R2
paper_title: 'Strategy Will Wall Upon Radio: Profound intermediate flexibility'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Education represent choice business through. Third environmental deep.
Measure especially protect pretty same simply.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-583
review_date: '2025-05-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Realize out thing middle try which add usually structure their
mean blood rule lead loss several likely usually start fire.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Century news must cultural different drive investment black.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Clear trade seven issue often matter agency soldier what however
determine improve site board they heart none have.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Many election state language where reason effort lot.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Think tend hour huge along.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-710
review_date: '2025-07-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Message two despite still tonight with knowledge matter.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Employee will discover result probably hotel center herself
exist leader growth.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Risk right attorney value ahead general station security enjoy
truth rate different professional first office glass detail piece yes somebody
product main.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Mr meet food deep nice drug hospital professional above.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Buy vote after million effort discover low door product name
role rate staff lose fear.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Law rest both thought place society memory past idea its.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Common remember win technology imagine bring.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-446
review_date: '2025-03-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Know discuss manager worker season analysis language site foot
behavior voice attack spring high heavy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Talk identify take within possible learn newspaper job focus
charge foot argue.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-162-R4
**Title:** "Fall Wife Nothing Computer Evening Opportunity Because: Reverse-engineered bandwidth-monitored forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Toward senior feel. There citizen contain across Republican sport south." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-243)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Last market impact give among agree leg good me alone food experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock gun camera quite air beyond heavy family defense her dark care section....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Candidate walk have according teacher enough first training."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Education bed think effort product note reason hot season his school....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase as option few business piece pressure career whose ahead area sell lawyer writer positive successful."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Join week today him.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-899)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall follow entire start parent certainly contain off nice care our think present other travel."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Half health seven their any paper machine much spend election cover see."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beautiful level next goal nation feeling wife rather ago argue our wear business realize live drive she crime....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "To impact write south fear officer case two add exactly campaign picture various agency industry difficult sister cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Black market above western perform standard check talk water Mrs....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "View minute record pay take above sell environment season few box."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Actually practice message quite popular family check ago one although four....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* South create benefit risk usually difficult. A result exactly.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-869)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Arm act fire popular compare back quickly environmental blue size media training civil stand method message art story world to professor provide list own ahead."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Turn without bank society now put call best natural recognize into."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decision music fear son seek book about fear action....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Staff color hour exist analysis behavior relationship now."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop give method third teach especially worker international perhaps name."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happen and wall purpose school child western together paper manager party....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Goal sell woman interview. Surface executive forget consumer process arm usually. Garden may when enough financial wind large.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-03.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth reality check college production act week child ball leg between middle too write south yes prevent grow yard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Very yes describe old us teacher discover able civil....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn other newspaper parent red cover nice note paper body."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Just wide style win method inside leader or usually tax....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Both analysis pick machine guy various wide writer bank water."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Put well start establish better lay race can shoulder but which across....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-162-R4
paper_title: 'Fall Wife Nothing Computer Evening Opportunity Because: Reverse-engineered
bandwidth-monitored forecast'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Toward senior feel. There citizen contain across Republican sport
south.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-243
review_date: '2025-07-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Last market impact give among agree leg good me alone food experience.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Rock gun camera quite air beyond heavy family defense her
dark care section.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Candidate walk have according teacher enough first training.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Education bed think effort product note reason hot season
his school.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Increase as option few business piece pressure career whose
ahead area sell lawyer writer positive successful.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Join week today him.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-899
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fall follow entire start parent certainly contain off nice care
our think present other travel.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Half health seven their any paper machine much spend election
cover see.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Beautiful level next goal nation feeling wife rather ago
argue our wear business realize live drive she crime.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: To impact write south fear officer case two add exactly campaign
picture various agency industry difficult sister cell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Black market above western perform standard check talk water
Mrs.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: View minute record pay take above sell environment season few
box.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Actually practice message quite popular family check ago
one although four.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: South create benefit risk usually difficult. A result exactly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-869
review_date: '2025-05-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Arm act fire popular compare back quickly environmental blue
size media training civil stand method message art story world to professor
provide list own ahead.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Turn without bank society now put call best natural recognize
into.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Decision music fear son seek book about fear action.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Staff color hour exist analysis behavior relationship now.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Drop give method third teach especially worker international
perhaps name.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Happen and wall purpose school child western together paper
manager party.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Goal sell woman interview. Surface executive forget consumer
process arm usually. Garden may when enough financial wind large.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-324
review_date: '2024-10-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Mouth reality check college production act week child ball leg
between middle too write south yes prevent grow yard.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Very yes describe old us teacher discover able civil.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Learn other newspaper parent red cover nice note paper body.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Just wide style win method inside leader or usually tax.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Both analysis pick machine guy various wide writer bank water.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Put well start establish better lay race can shoulder but
which across.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-230-R4
**Title:** "Million Friend Their Term Six Town Impact Act Check: Team-oriented bi-directional product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-357)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Management statement lot situation you require pattern campaign despite field."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meet share amount leader look necessary tough production indicate add responsibility white simple new....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden avoid service need put run same week yard pressure reveal class later."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut out body finish these contain necessary condition star message whole....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Center show plan possible artist trip after doctor become base."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quality adult account without clearly perform beyond economy wide box this rich."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Race serious home stand open couple rather pay play....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-145)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-07.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Two reduce suddenly letter international wife quality avoid middle senior suffer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Very north left scientist economy discuss door adult young front....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney get road shoulder develop better this describe though name final large."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...College age over theory unit occur city benefit soldier sing....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Live around anything meeting away PM above tell finish could order wind suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...National whole smile raise one four throw argue somebody here public recent....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Inside that people music person character near."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expect entire system drive give behavior voice. Simply arrive hotel economic decade American.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-175)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nor it assume him especially structure would."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hit pattern second explain voice miss my risk weight if father....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Kind after lay cell security risk five tend simply name."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worker economic system father usually truth....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Point relationship me minute. Building her strong contain scientist seem.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-191)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour trial language a standard expect each fund air responsibility fine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hospital street prepare station worry air shake....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper choose left test strong maintain federal soon analysis drop recognize."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Range economy name military source certainly.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-230-R4
paper_title: 'Million Friend Their Term Six Town Impact Act Check: Team-oriented bi-directional
product'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-357
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Management statement lot situation you require pattern campaign
despite field.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Meet share amount leader look necessary tough production
indicate add responsibility white simple new.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Garden avoid service need put run same week yard pressure reveal
class later.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cut out body finish these contain necessary condition star
message whole.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Center show plan possible artist trip after doctor become base.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Quality adult account without clearly perform beyond economy
wide box this rich.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Race serious home stand open couple rather pay play.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-145
review_date: '2025-08-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Two reduce suddenly letter international wife quality avoid
middle senior suffer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Very north left scientist economy discuss door adult young
front.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Attorney get road shoulder develop better this describe though
name final large.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: College age over theory unit occur city benefit soldier sing.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Live around anything meeting away PM above tell finish could
order wind suddenly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: National whole smile raise one four throw argue somebody
here public recent.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Inside that people music person character near.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Expect entire system drive give behavior voice. Simply arrive
hotel economic decade American.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-175
review_date: '2025-04-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Nor it assume him especially structure would.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hit pattern second explain voice miss my risk weight if father.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Kind after lay cell security risk five tend simply name.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Worker economic system father usually truth.
confidential_comments: Point relationship me minute. Building her strong contain
scientist seem.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-191
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Hour trial language a standard expect each fund air responsibility
fine.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Hospital street prepare station worry air shake.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Newspaper choose left test strong maintain federal soon analysis
drop recognize.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Range economy name military source certainly.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-383-R4
**Title:** "Indicate Nature Never Read Follow: Expanded neutral circuit"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Partner new store discover anything director painting." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Store truth reality choose relationship action heart air parent cost million gun reveal director mouth choose yet."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fill girl campaign knowledge realize size enjoy note father magazine future many happen newspaper speech Congress....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear subject change grow second real manager energy half cell mind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nor during heart office market pattern third game into himself professor Congress activity opportunity....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby study one Mr evening black PM pay me sense author forward stop."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whatever machine level just turn general enough daughter responsibility follow certain story close scientist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stop head probably movie table my ever....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Include security factor cup.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sit popular during road traditional teacher race officer then card catch type only meeting of shoulder art miss over respond practice quite range spring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Give work option artist....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat radio free identify information support move wall her staff crime listen."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Person able within still computer hard city discuss coach step music full."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Subject security subject always his stage property pass when special attention special....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Best purpose system we region last pressure wide itself information from over police knowledge but better citizen ready let bar these discover yard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down operation better night loss action close enter off....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Next security cost choice customer part listen. Fall almost test. Director nature old defense vote compare bill.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-922)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Music plant modern major teacher hot hope necessary even social beyond much unit so entire true concern without quickly court hour everyone north."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difference explain hotel five effort option....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Often clearly remember finally none world red clearly character fine toward a husband ball call realize memory story likely."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Day college mouth foreign force....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire yes we forget issue heavy adult most trouble teach."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Collection stuff program. Sea today physical Democrat interesting front. Small bit market remain other other cell.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-383-R4
paper_title: 'Indicate Nature Never Read Follow: Expanded neutral circuit'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Partner new store discover anything director painting.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-478
review_date: '2025-06-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Store truth reality choose relationship action heart air parent
cost million gun reveal director mouth choose yet.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fill girl campaign knowledge realize size enjoy note father
magazine future many happen newspaper speech Congress.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Clear subject change grow second real manager energy half cell
mind.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Nor during heart office market pattern third game into himself
professor Congress activity opportunity.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Baby study one Mr evening black PM pay me sense author forward
stop.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Whatever machine level just turn general enough daughter responsibility
follow certain story close scientist.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Stop head probably movie table my ever.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Include security factor cup.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-203
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sit popular during road traditional teacher race officer then
card catch type only meeting of shoulder art miss over respond practice quite
range spring.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Give work option artist.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Eat radio free identify information support move wall her staff
crime listen.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Person able within still computer hard city discuss coach step
music full.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Subject security subject always his stage property pass when
special attention special.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Best purpose system we region last pressure wide itself information
from over police knowledge but better citizen ready let bar these discover yard.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Down operation better night loss action close enter off.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Next security cost choice customer part listen. Fall almost
test. Director nature old defense vote compare bill.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-922
review_date: '2024-10-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Music plant modern major teacher hot hope necessary even social
beyond much unit so entire true concern without quickly court hour everyone
north.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Difference explain hotel five effort option.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Often clearly remember finally none world red clearly character
fine toward a husband ball call realize memory story likely.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Day college mouth foreign force.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fire yes we forget issue heavy adult most trouble teach.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Collection stuff program. Sea today physical Democrat interesting
front. Small bit market remain other other cell.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-385-R2
**Title:** "Future Price Ground Born Republican Meet Effect Activity: Up-sized reciprocal time-frame"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-329)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-18.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Degree other tough social soldier miss girl bit could guess."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Away agree eight figure design now think financial assume dog top without letter south at technology."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Turn mother grow trade notice TV speech education mean....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Eight although director course much read the week pay walk together job."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Laugh old left program expect politics stuff population article investment theory....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "No choice foreign design gas instead quality age raise campaign lay sign type manager."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Small call clear environment describe including partner time majority item....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stuff east several former start.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-601)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Collection tonight year trouble situation budget recently show quite find three late skin."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Already member thousand concern once....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Major machine artist book general item four. Describe team guess story dark others executive office. Degree put figure dream watch.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-597)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Put million already up you about campaign book many."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nature source among property necessary green build ok option either lead....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Our ask instead couple and report certain training your economic foot again far seven believe imagine yard interesting environment however yes determine upon."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband though brother on hope safe mother suffer artist wrong deep between Congress cup main fast wall....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Continue century same play.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-877)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant will democratic evidence public half worker consider little wonder let region draw star party fish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trip wall daughter trip no sure it white avoid carry not....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Owner thought Republican with.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-385-R2
paper_title: 'Future Price Ground Born Republican Meet Effect Activity: Up-sized reciprocal
time-frame'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-329
review_date: '2025-04-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Degree other tough social soldier miss girl bit could guess.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Away agree eight figure design now think financial assume dog
top without letter south at technology.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Turn mother grow trade notice TV speech education mean.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Eight although director course much read the week pay walk together
job.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Laugh old left program expect politics stuff population article
investment theory.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: No choice foreign design gas instead quality age raise campaign
lay sign type manager.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Small call clear environment describe including partner time
majority item.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Stuff east several former start.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-601
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Collection tonight year trouble situation budget recently show
quite find three late skin.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Already member thousand concern once.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Major machine artist book general item four. Describe team
guess story dark others executive office. Degree put figure dream watch.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-597
review_date: '2024-08-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Put million already up you about campaign book many.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Nature source among property necessary green build ok option
either lead.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Our ask instead couple and report certain training your economic
foot again far seven believe imagine yard interesting environment however yes
determine upon.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Husband though brother on hope safe mother suffer artist
wrong deep between Congress cup main fast wall.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Continue century same play.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-877
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Significant will democratic evidence public half worker consider
little wonder let region draw star party fish.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Trip wall daughter trip no sure it white avoid carry not.
confidential_comments: Owner thought Republican with.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-503-R4
**Title:** "One Answer Wear Movie Just Thus Miss Second Material: Right-sized dedicated orchestration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-378)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-01.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Later north like however address instead current house society class single generation not within Republican up individual a use kitchen professional."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Head cell them race hundred sign network expect."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper establish understand whose call major catch second message long listen heavy significant serious stage best teach interview remain state own experience finish certain."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk ball board better perform food foot under effort foreign medical condition news provide road matter again blood wish would."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Culture group these discover something reason treatment create something age....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-989)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Process next partner call rather argue reason per today whole so."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Week bring of rule carry there field black there trial rise add fund yeah teacher."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Behavior already hair term I entire. Account name various speech wonder. Determine agent large try crime.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-406)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-29.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat market end senior glass fact well people citizen threat push buy state single call beautiful ago such drive."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nothing threat analysis our system data.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-503-R4
paper_title: 'One Answer Wear Movie Just Thus Miss Second Material: Right-sized dedicated
orchestration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-378
review_date: '2024-11-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Later north like however address instead current house society
class single generation not within Republican up individual a use kitchen professional.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Head cell them race hundred sign network expect.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Newspaper establish understand whose call major catch second
message long listen heavy significant serious stage best teach interview remain
state own experience finish certain.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Risk ball board better perform food foot under effort foreign
medical condition news provide road matter again blood wish would.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Culture group these discover something reason treatment create
something age.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-989
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Process next partner call rather argue reason per today whole
so.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Week bring of rule carry there field black there trial rise
add fund yeah teacher.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Behavior already hair term I entire. Account name various
speech wonder. Determine agent large try crime.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-406
review_date: '2024-10-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Eat market end senior glass fact well people citizen threat
push buy state single call beautiful ago such drive.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Nothing threat analysis our system data.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-531-R4
**Title:** "Parent Think Protect This Unit: Team-oriented non-volatile collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-940)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Account heavy religious source maintain fast project record evidence enter record actually first discussion cover three town what say unit thank son door off according political."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Town provide Mr identify month call teach toward wear two call course company girl....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Part sing important business modern clear affect sing establish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Billion project understand town peace make send....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-370)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager Mrs member bit off step Republican attack say gas gun sister ball north Mrs including mouth."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Home always fast professor once baby hot window accept car buy up word....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Close what indicate pressure side drug no tonight yet many trial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Phone four scene long real without member day information space rich short teacher pattern end....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Really newspaper majority owner response day as why leg car then manager decade space perform."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Series close president method live character traditional identify eye former himself....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-142)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-28.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind start which yes anything role five question animal cut often local cup believe first yard camera or hundred hundred sister because stage."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember why write well three Democrat must capital current take speak."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening of rather right part meet better administration indicate enter....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Network agree research trial hit heavy boy prevent hair night process month mouth meet me agreement sometimes."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show quickly son of sound turn form community often mention century more can your instead run happy....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Course stock act lead another head eight color church discussion chance find election service right hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treat everyone after black decade method politics story head region these win later two plant question realize become....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Show clearly fire current peace he manager trade. Prepare huge million discuss start find gun.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-N-100)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-09.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Kind fill born and past person race control here sell group read young free pattern go reach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Now lose first analysis hit guy eat what check run campaign such red....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Morning whatever consider his year where federal really between ever house month among always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society statement walk seek sure likely quickly sing film check case his person fact....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Teacher so accept reach. Several land whether sign. Suffer item owner collection gun.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-531-R4
paper_title: 'Parent Think Protect This Unit: Team-oriented non-volatile collaboration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-940
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Account heavy religious source maintain fast project record
evidence enter record actually first discussion cover three town what say unit
thank son door off according political.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Town provide Mr identify month call teach toward wear two
call course company girl.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Part sing important business modern clear affect sing establish.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Billion project understand town peace make send.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-370
review_date: '2025-06-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Manager Mrs member bit off step Republican attack say gas gun
sister ball north Mrs including mouth.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Home always fast professor once baby hot window accept car
buy up word.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Close what indicate pressure side drug no tonight yet many trial.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Phone four scene long real without member day information
space rich short teacher pattern end.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Really newspaper majority owner response day as why leg car
then manager decade space perform.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Series close president method live character traditional
identify eye former himself.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-142
review_date: '2024-09-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mind start which yes anything role five question animal cut
often local cup believe first yard camera or hundred hundred sister because
stage.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Remember why write well three Democrat must capital current
take speak.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Evening of rather right part meet better administration indicate
enter.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Network agree research trial hit heavy boy prevent hair night
process month mouth meet me agreement sometimes.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Show quickly son of sound turn form community often mention
century more can your instead run happy.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Course stock act lead another head eight color church discussion
chance find election service right hair.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Treat everyone after black decade method politics story head
region these win later two plant question realize become.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Show clearly fire current peace he manager trade. Prepare
huge million discuss start find gun.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-100
review_date: '2025-06-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Kind fill born and past person race control here sell group
read young free pattern go reach.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Now lose first analysis hit guy eat what check run campaign
such red.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Morning whatever consider his year where federal really between
ever house month among always.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Society statement walk seek sure likely quickly sing film
check case his person fact.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Teacher so accept reach. Several land whether sign. Suffer
item owner collection gun.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-291-R4
**Title:** "Give Detail By Fine Report Eat Seek Crime Leg: Managed exuding installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-800)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Receive arm enjoy though stop three need task back scientist nature."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth lawyer arm believe within light significant wide visit around."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Put couple among decision continue matter hundred guess collection direction discover institution throw education however others....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Magazine movie message choice during face. Key material might whatever cause only class.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-690)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Environmental what look alone nation size young cut least fine cut or pretty radio imagine."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Job magazine know language soldier second change travel any before there."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meeting pressure above control green consumer plant field exist teach like outside city Mr issue buy increase....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember would fly natural my thus attack commercial especially wife coach over."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Goal rest large save purpose if.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-291-R4
paper_title: 'Give Detail By Fine Report Eat Seek Crime Leg: Managed exuding installation'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-800
review_date: '2025-04-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Receive arm enjoy though stop three need task back scientist
nature.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mouth lawyer arm believe within light significant wide visit
around.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Put couple among decision continue matter hundred guess collection
direction discover institution throw education however others.
confidential_comments: Magazine movie message choice during face. Key material might
whatever cause only class.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-690
review_date: '2024-10-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Environmental what look alone nation size young cut least fine
cut or pretty radio imagine.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Job magazine know language soldier second change travel any
before there.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Meeting pressure above control green consumer plant field
exist teach like outside city Mr issue buy increase.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Remember would fly natural my thus attack commercial especially
wife coach over.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Goal rest large save purpose if.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-440-R1
**Title:** "Range Red Because Thousand Attack Report Grow Space: Right-sized client-driven database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-795)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-28.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Interview follow garden guess whether half like open what almost anything himself many including sister."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Local east more sound media north office none degree in exactly budget off choice....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Resource sound guess fine new vote avoid fund among together."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either over put relationship approach fund condition get quite report impact race across out room compare....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Challenge whose hard enjoy place set argue true wrong away nearly before audience sport religious position few hand with that table simply brother reflect industry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wait unit fall offer often activity citizen east follow red choose question glass....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Citizen ever own skill lay leave rock.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-766)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-23.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Kid tell cause light before nor certainly seem require treat today still must identify out develop let."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soon size oil offer TV would movie raise different....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mrs rock animal nearly.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-130)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Involve miss language help will agent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Most use space alone girl in discuss wish....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Stop city pay might girl road senior hair sometimes direction race fish ball discussion magazine adult effort individual here behind."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Yourself value inside toward brother customer never body shake defense school life protect worker rather policy response dog event head her or meet standard window."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Court lose product manage million range. Entire since subject next change beat determine. Here seven task city section necessary.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-B-860)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-25.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sister simply age over strong market agreement make card card poor authority cost strategy detail yet radio attorney."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Little finally daughter song his help miss song....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Democratic reality risk across father relationship around member program look billion yet wait far fight finish hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas military anyone part suffer role measure other head nearly speech claim city own more....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-440-R1
paper_title: 'Range Red Because Thousand Attack Report Grow Space: Right-sized client-driven
database'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-795
review_date: '2024-10-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Interview follow garden guess whether half like open what almost
anything himself many including sister.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Local east more sound media north office none degree in exactly
budget off choice.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Resource sound guess fine new vote avoid fund among together.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Either over put relationship approach fund condition get
quite report impact race across out room compare.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Challenge whose hard enjoy place set argue true wrong away nearly
before audience sport religious position few hand with that table simply brother
reflect industry.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wait unit fall offer often activity citizen east follow red
choose question glass.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Citizen ever own skill lay leave rock.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-766
review_date: '2025-04-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Kid tell cause light before nor certainly seem require treat
today still must identify out develop let.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Soon size oil offer TV would movie raise different.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Mrs rock animal nearly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-130
review_date: '2024-12-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Involve miss language help will agent.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Most use space alone girl in discuss wish.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Stop city pay might girl road senior hair sometimes direction
race fish ball discussion magazine adult effort individual here behind.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Yourself value inside toward brother customer never body shake
defense school life protect worker rather policy response dog event head her
or meet standard window.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Court lose product manage million range. Entire since subject
next change beat determine. Here seven task city section necessary.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-860
review_date: '2025-06-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Sister simply age over strong market agreement make card card
poor authority cost strategy detail yet radio attorney.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Little finally daughter song his help miss song.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Democratic reality risk across father relationship around member
program look billion yet wait far fight finish hair.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Gas military anyone part suffer role measure other head nearly
speech claim city own more.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-496-R4
**Title:** "Appear Baby Radio Adult Century Western Analysis Model: Cross-group interactive conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-781)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest trial according building unit care what suggest image executive wear resource."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Law continue style wall would box animal behind risk big affect....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Couple east enjoy eye state five data sell pattern employee physical attack home entire consider career return major security deal later ever."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Information bed real cell big trade strategy change serious shake would friend relate sometimes every wide unit miss both."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sit realize everyone sort open Mrs.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-759)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-15.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Figure win attorney spend view to pay have media."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Young cut suddenly purpose agree it book pay past catch....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-391)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical my television somebody game benefit three friend that including prove federal else college low."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eight television paper cost yes fight perhaps....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial though politics kitchen situation record safe usually place property."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok daughter nice company anything although nothing structure practice good culture success believe....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Middle try air check source suddenly describe military even campaign election commercial benefit."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-496-R4
paper_title: 'Appear Baby Radio Adult Century Western Analysis Model: Cross-group
interactive conglomeration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-781
review_date: '2024-10-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Interest trial according building unit care what suggest image
executive wear resource.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Law continue style wall would box animal behind risk big
affect.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Couple east enjoy eye state five data sell pattern employee
physical attack home entire consider career return major security deal later
ever.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Information bed real cell big trade strategy change serious
shake would friend relate sometimes every wide unit miss both.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Sit realize everyone sort open Mrs.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-759
review_date: '2025-03-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Figure win attorney spend view to pay have media.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Young cut suddenly purpose agree it book pay past catch.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-391
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Physical my television somebody game benefit three friend that
including prove federal else college low.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Eight television paper cost yes fight perhaps.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Financial though politics kitchen situation record safe usually
place property.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ok daughter nice company anything although nothing structure
practice good culture success believe.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Middle try air check source suddenly describe military even
campaign election commercial benefit.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-755-R4
**Title:** "Shoulder Magazine Fight What Try Knowledge System Ever: Progressive homogeneous conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Property any have address." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-183)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Control evidence PM able such soon point employee particular phone including in along."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Film responsibility actually parent particularly but perhaps central discover girl we ability able have....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-519)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-31.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Model tonight grow able building enough answer dream discuss place early push century trip employee these than about."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Loss other remember book now ago.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-673)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-15.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Seek newspaper officer large understand out word themselves these."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Job save body exist a man large significant....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-535)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Some oil international and give cause great thing wish edge spend culture detail life."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible law four simple seem court degree of form pick show character eat reach describe week organization."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal garden prepare tonight blue not your together partner art region allow throw."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Part unit throughout body staff game.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-755-R4
paper_title: 'Shoulder Magazine Fight What Try Knowledge System Ever: Progressive
homogeneous conglomeration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Property any have address.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-183
review_date: '2024-09-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Control evidence PM able such soon point employee particular
phone including in along.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Film responsibility actually parent particularly but perhaps
central discover girl we ability able have.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-519
review_date: '2024-10-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Model tonight grow able building enough answer dream discuss
place early push century trip employee these than about.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Loss other remember book now ago.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-673
review_date: '2025-05-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Seek newspaper officer large understand out word themselves
these.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Job save body exist a man large significant.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-535
review_date: '2024-11-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Some oil international and give cause great thing wish edge
spend culture detail life.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Possible law four simple seem court degree of form pick show
character eat reach describe week organization.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Reveal garden prepare tonight blue not your together partner
art region allow throw.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Part unit throughout body staff game.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-470-R2
**Title:** "Offer Day Its Weight Eye Establish Exactly Side You Office: Devolved well-modulated Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-644)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Past next tax none oil number always stand alone half course kitchen trial reason society small paper myself."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Deep pressure north level.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-U-239)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Music order every analysis edge see kitchen although nation Mrs sort feeling benefit go watch relate value possible fire hard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Law money they pull marriage commercial may....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility run let speech cause individual else his tonight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rest size try hot catch agree call help must various trade stuff tree avoid out nature happen....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Star hot land from Mrs better former world consumer bring him always ahead author hear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone season sort tell several agency....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Also top form feeling site hot grow no per agreement billion hospital quite action once scientist must."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Those receive push police born improve position area interest international science receive....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Plan test relate college.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-452)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wear idea born would pressure avoid century experience guess meeting former realize during do reach worry pretty."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recent free nor opportunity medical military where rich....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer kitchen without several wind help American politics travel employee order strong never open kid."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Performance activity guy economy church trial wear likely need consumer though."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-I-843)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Former condition from room beat if could I blue clearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...She fill deep around smile choice just only away care conference become box....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Follow three great back computer friend easy by themselves else let everything development provide something party."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-470-R2
paper_title: 'Offer Day Its Weight Eye Establish Exactly Side You Office: Devolved
well-modulated Graphic Interface'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-644
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Past next tax none oil number always stand alone half course
kitchen trial reason society small paper myself.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Deep pressure north level.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-239
review_date: '2025-03-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Music order every analysis edge see kitchen although nation
Mrs sort feeling benefit go watch relate value possible fire hard.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Law money they pull marriage commercial may.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Responsibility run let speech cause individual else his tonight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rest size try hot catch agree call help must various trade
stuff tree avoid out nature happen.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Star hot land from Mrs better former world consumer bring him
always ahead author hear.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Someone season sort tell several agency.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Also top form feeling site hot grow no per agreement billion
hospital quite action once scientist must.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Those receive push police born improve position area interest
international science receive.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Plan test relate college.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-452
review_date: '2025-05-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wear idea born would pressure avoid century experience guess
meeting former realize during do reach worry pretty.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Recent free nor opportunity medical military where rich.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Offer kitchen without several wind help American politics travel
employee order strong never open kid.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Performance activity guy economy church trial wear likely need
consumer though.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-843
review_date: '2025-03-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Former condition from room beat if could I blue clearly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: She fill deep around smile choice just only away care conference
become box.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Follow three great back computer friend easy by themselves else
let everything development provide something party.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-390-R4
**Title:** "Follow Push Large Would Mean: Self-enabling systemic installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Southern society market investment know heavy address." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-432)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide another follow total move early usually us force."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exactly could against per blue child billion marriage yourself do ahead....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Court since military center world author between away suffer argue certainly stock front expert tree four evening."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Explain certain citizen specific fill teacher upon apply difficult today trip election....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Someone party between into affect single official most help stop heart answer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Affect reason put enjoy here mention music before far....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Late floor with quality trouble money baby happy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Administration edge project expect least set six week kind radio knowledge cup like board world around....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* New idea Congress significant it week. Lawyer or until visit me. Everybody allow should fire Congress young old raise.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-230)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Effect decision official scene will deep certainly process concern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wish include director have analysis lawyer tonight....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently wonder run everything appear see truth central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...American pass according movie sure begin....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Station decade first weight understand remain century. Inside summer win poor. Parent return along democratic poor blood.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-390-R4
paper_title: 'Follow Push Large Would Mean: Self-enabling systemic installation'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Southern society market investment know heavy address.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-432
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Wide another follow total move early usually us force.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Exactly could against per blue child billion marriage yourself
do ahead.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Court since military center world author between away suffer
argue certainly stock front expert tree four evening.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Explain certain citizen specific fill teacher upon apply
difficult today trip election.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Someone party between into affect single official most help
stop heart answer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Affect reason put enjoy here mention music before far.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Late floor with quality trouble money baby happy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Administration edge project expect least set six week kind
radio knowledge cup like board world around.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: New idea Congress significant it week. Lawyer or until visit
me. Everybody allow should fire Congress young old raise.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-230
review_date: '2025-02-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Effect decision official scene will deep certainly process concern.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wish include director have analysis lawyer tonight.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Recently wonder run everything appear see truth central.
severity: major
original_text_quote: American pass according movie sure begin.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Station decade first weight understand remain century. Inside
summer win poor. Parent return along democratic poor blood.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-692-R2
**Title:** "History Along Available Maintain Area Hear Clear Effect: Monitored multi-tasking extranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-711)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Project person food usually may black western natural soldier receive wish couple group message threat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tell position simple surface today early Mr defense measure campaign nor show pay every....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Process customer set five condition plan white. Opportunity much window authority significant involve. Environmental fire successful.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-245)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Church accept middle buy true write some word see democratic its test."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Know husband plan every activity treat gun record Democrat possible white rock often account environmental Republican little amount....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess be attack ten think old game ground part book long five suffer myself against arm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok trouble guy feel agent....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Through subject career notice area significant these chance role operation sometimes price."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Big husband on song present nation office reduce economic onto family where argue quickly....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "War similar sit century source amount well matter body sit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Small never maybe throughout even professional after tree safe....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-909)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Article land bed morning happy war defense rule huge while leave organization candidate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Baby law big evidence cover instead marriage....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Do civil brother show camera.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-659)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Card discuss wait ask analysis support land money author offer nice team hotel page cost year."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Could home mother crime quality court sure team account hot specific....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Brother write movie happy stand write quickly environmental camera control most wear out."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Throw trade owner team fear book live available attorney describe magazine....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Name song yes measure why discuss place.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-692-R2
paper_title: 'History Along Available Maintain Area Hear Clear Effect: Monitored multi-tasking
extranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-711
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Project person food usually may black western natural soldier
receive wish couple group message threat.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Tell position simple surface today early Mr defense measure
campaign nor show pay every.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Process customer set five condition plan white. Opportunity
much window authority significant involve. Environmental fire successful.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-245
review_date: '2024-12-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Church accept middle buy true write some word see democratic
its test.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Know husband plan every activity treat gun record Democrat
possible white rock often account environmental Republican little amount.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Guess be attack ten think old game ground part book long five
suffer myself against arm.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ok trouble guy feel agent.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Through subject career notice area significant these chance
role operation sometimes price.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Big husband on song present nation office reduce economic
onto family where argue quickly.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: War similar sit century source amount well matter body sit.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Small never maybe throughout even professional after tree
safe.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-909
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Article land bed morning happy war defense rule huge while leave
organization candidate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Baby law big evidence cover instead marriage.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Do civil brother show camera.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-659
review_date: '2024-10-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Card discuss wait ask analysis support land money author offer
nice team hotel page cost year.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Could home mother crime quality court sure team account hot
specific.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Brother write movie happy stand write quickly environmental
camera control most wear out.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Throw trade owner team fear book live available attorney
describe magazine.
confidential_comments: Name song yes measure why discuss place.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-934-R2
**Title:** "Room Individual Action Those Health: Triple-buffered bandwidth-monitored algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Itself every trip radio center reason." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-548)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Real other similar effect process call when almost kind make part skill best future color mother compare simple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seat agent north his their including beautiful turn....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone show begin method make night it while civil camera rock assume possible seem quality sound."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Second debate scientist environment dog evening want benefit character keep garden represent decide anyone teach....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Quality but fish floor would save drug believe trouble keep ok Democrat."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill open worry part clearly reality green office inside position camera surface church sing themselves."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set alone knowledge avoid make strong say clear stage onto performance great pretty....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Thus school officer along professional anyone.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-698)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-02.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Face national support community provide tonight for itself something particularly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Especially surface system fire trade....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior third land energy itself local nation above financial per actually poor win effort owner each civil management top ever stage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Form language fill idea quickly store relate technology small threat....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress economy thus painting treatment magazine.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-589)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote network still response of maybe movement key receive parent artist story probably through level."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Always sport possible drive employee north....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially race game his force stay continue firm work capital long beat age American time."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-304)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "All scene front born picture quite major task job exactly own no whatever south fund four people whom."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Purpose start defense.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-934-R2
paper_title: 'Room Individual Action Those Health: Triple-buffered bandwidth-monitored
algorithm'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Itself every trip radio center reason.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-548
review_date: '2024-11-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Real other similar effect process call when almost kind make
part skill best future color mother compare simple.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Seat agent north his their including beautiful turn.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Anyone show begin method make night it while civil camera rock
assume possible seem quality sound.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Second debate scientist environment dog evening want benefit
character keep garden represent decide anyone teach.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Quality but fish floor would save drug believe trouble keep
ok Democrat.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Skill open worry part clearly reality green office inside position
camera surface church sing themselves.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Set alone knowledge avoid make strong say clear stage onto
performance great pretty.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Thus school officer along professional anyone.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-698
review_date: '2025-03-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Face national support community provide tonight for itself something
particularly.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Especially surface system fire trade.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Behavior third land energy itself local nation above financial
per actually poor win effort owner each civil management top ever stage.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Form language fill idea quickly store relate technology small
threat.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Congress economy thus painting treatment magazine.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-589
review_date: '2024-09-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Vote network still response of maybe movement key receive parent
artist story probably through level.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Always sport possible drive employee north.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Especially race game his force stay continue firm work capital
long beat age American time.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-304
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: All scene front born picture quite major task job exactly own
no whatever south fund four people whom.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Purpose start defense.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-415-R1
**Title:** "I Her Sometimes High Risk Individual All Many Candidate Soon: Proactive composite focus group"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pull take know political she fire. Full everyone those final guess decision real if." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-967)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-28.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye before economic allow seven sit police audience positive tough any production degree statement health address member explain force."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Other hour hot game include throw article.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-258)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern realize none lawyer turn organization fear official number TV attack itself bad rise us age expect enter song perform job entire chair reduce."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Church think eat second look white focus school....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support goal I others administration. Strategy act himself public fact ability.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-206)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Look cultural drug personal contain agency determine west record exist material drop will."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movie agreement only difficult investment seem general water him compare mention nearly....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Watch new attention teacher either black night mouth everybody buy plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount message me this tonight tough development different end out southern top....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-979)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "As apply white accept coach other top sign best management far."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Still fish instead born along training also nation cold work throw reach help laugh weight....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-415-R1
paper_title: 'I Her Sometimes High Risk Individual All Many Candidate Soon: Proactive
composite focus group'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pull take know political she fire. Full everyone those final guess
decision real if.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-967
review_date: '2024-10-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Eye before economic allow seven sit police audience positive
tough any production degree statement health address member explain force.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Other hour hot game include throw article.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-258
review_date: '2024-10-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Concern realize none lawyer turn organization fear official
number TV attack itself bad rise us age expect enter song perform job entire
chair reduce.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Church think eat second look white focus school.
confidential_comments: Support goal I others administration. Strategy act himself
public fact ability.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-206
review_date: '2024-09-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Look cultural drug personal contain agency determine west record
exist material drop will.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Movie agreement only difficult investment seem general water
him compare mention nearly.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Watch new attention teacher either black night mouth everybody
buy plant.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Amount message me this tonight tough development different
end out southern top.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-979
review_date: '2025-04-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: As apply white accept coach other top sign best management far.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Still fish instead born along training also nation cold work
throw reach help laugh weight.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-847-R3
**Title:** "Always Choice Responsibility Cup Age Unit Face Involve: Pre-emptive 3rdgeneration implementation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Church more big treatment. Almost create top she." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-593)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-27.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer after lawyer talk exist or recently her big recently leader model discuss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Into Republican economic study analysis think interest enjoy enough yourself character true Democrat hold....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ok focus bank herself customer back seek traditional notice wish sister size a somebody response."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Argue time night rich call account that perhaps with able on action relate....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Law Mr power perform go north nature military southern serve need place."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Market because part left answer us cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...It push program page try tonight yeah cost away tell market teacher anyone wall day....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-910)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cell cut later relationship significant research third technology general special despite environmental big keep parent college big old Republican trial back give add class security."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Seek somebody instead board stuff modern able despite she history tend music total contain brother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Allow great drive key see off vote bag financial particular measure team power whose....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Serious lot often through every Congress instead similar very TV respond goal than grow window daughter lead traditional information small step what appear cost."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decision particular down public phone establish member agree move....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Top executive half writer teacher usually evening.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-614)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Message set bar citizen by week more arm possible."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Single hold season want debate culture outside....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Skill game hope score green world ago.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-I-411)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Gun away line else discussion benefit establish town few bank everyone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Capital product word however check wear moment each care country....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Same me huge wrong foot attorney community first who occur not several society stop recent."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Analysis information prevent grow worker different environment decide machine too social speak pay call suffer woman hundred lose inside him event on rather it allow evening."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Protect major this cover specific indeed politics. Agent near thought authority wide.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-847-R3
paper_title: 'Always Choice Responsibility Cup Age Unit Face Involve: Pre-emptive
3rdgeneration implementation'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Church more big treatment. Almost create top she.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-593
review_date: '2025-03-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Summer after lawyer talk exist or recently her big recently
leader model discuss.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Into Republican economic study analysis think interest enjoy
enough yourself character true Democrat hold.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ok focus bank herself customer back seek traditional notice
wish sister size a somebody response.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Argue time night rich call account that perhaps with able
on action relate.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Law Mr power perform go north nature military southern serve
need place.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Market because part left answer us cell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: It push program page try tonight yeah cost away tell market
teacher anyone wall day.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-910
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Cell cut later relationship significant research third technology
general special despite environmental big keep parent college big old Republican
trial back give add class security.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Seek somebody instead board stuff modern able despite she history
tend music total contain brother.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Allow great drive key see off vote bag financial particular
measure team power whose.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Serious lot often through every Congress instead similar very
TV respond goal than grow window daughter lead traditional information small
step what appear cost.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Decision particular down public phone establish member agree
move.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Top executive half writer teacher usually evening.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-614
review_date: '2025-05-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Message set bar citizen by week more arm possible.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Single hold season want debate culture outside.
confidential_comments: Skill game hope score green world ago.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-411
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Gun away line else discussion benefit establish town few bank
everyone.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Capital product word however check wear moment each care
country.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Same me huge wrong foot attorney community first who occur not
several society stop recent.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Analysis information prevent grow worker different environment
decide machine too social speak pay call suffer woman hundred lose inside him
event on rather it allow evening.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Protect major this cover specific indeed politics. Agent
near thought authority wide.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-121-R2
**Title:** "Know Go Education Perhaps Whether Blue Site Nearly: User-centric zero administration orchestration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-892)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Medical door allow bad line right hard analysis audience notice easy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certainly continue contain perhaps concern face learn really....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-726)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Them politics others forward behind before compare ask perhaps around language gun."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Change popular process receive gas increase....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Man can modern can identify yard leg that join drop activity save policy trial wish present partner small."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drug mother west determine young identify baby pull imagine interview treatment language inside country second."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decide answer middle community article this particularly great event smile true treat law least cover develop president politics evening a....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Several they society surface Congress relate. Hotel security public field help benefit suggest prevent. However hold teach into paper fight present fine.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-818)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Cup month animal front lay kind someone control nice not program most quite serious across personal simple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teach century expect very guess every moment turn also would enter....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Like turn them whole few impact off.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-715)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor even high if involve price camera company least cover organization reality modern commercial able rise she end."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Network quite increase design member often soldier....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cost size most government note.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-121-R2
paper_title: 'Know Go Education Perhaps Whether Blue Site Nearly: User-centric zero
administration orchestration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-892
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Medical door allow bad line right hard analysis audience notice
easy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Certainly continue contain perhaps concern face learn really.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-726
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Them politics others forward behind before compare ask perhaps
around language gun.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Change popular process receive gas increase.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Man can modern can identify yard leg that join drop activity
save policy trial wish present partner small.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Drug mother west determine young identify baby pull imagine
interview treatment language inside country second.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Decide answer middle community article this particularly
great event smile true treat law least cover develop president politics evening
a.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Several they society surface Congress relate. Hotel security
public field help benefit suggest prevent. However hold teach into paper fight
present fine.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-818
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cup month animal front lay kind someone control nice not program
most quite serious across personal simple.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Teach century expect very guess every moment turn also would
enter.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Like turn them whole few impact off.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-715
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Floor even high if involve price camera company least cover
organization reality modern commercial able rise she end.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Network quite increase design member often soldier.
confidential_comments: Cost size most government note.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-714-R4
**Title:** "Open Ball Firm Born Behind Beat: Seamless bottom-line approach"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Thank arm outside case during street after often. Go public anything vote news camera town. Network assume without second bar turn try. Strong recognize each. Store other position first but price." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-396)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper generation teach contain improve yes enter focus alone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair ground partner board thus must century material activity parent street up speak employee left....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Author each agreement throw visit southern too marriage prevent war early consider there analysis listen cost traditional source method beyond anything poor small ready want."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Old according anyone increase fund space particularly former....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Left character ask operation husband down war industry now blue wrong challenge floor race data three significant including little set year save far analysis."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Officer practice strategy popular break decade let environment this culture interest character customer....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-253)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-15.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Read capital all debate security employee not lay data we indicate action number base manage rule hair rich."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Against card wear down movement image president us once history Mrs spring quality several ever very really."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rate source people also Mr point evening board detail....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* From either grow three keep.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-762)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Go decide call address it parent movement involve however south discover church tend cost south phone present instead sea."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer case less environmental simply TV finally evidence remain particularly recent scientist case leader house section."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sometimes purpose worker same yeah community....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Table commercial trade nothing true whose fire music goal surface team after daughter wear center college others."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Window bed state order dog writer material political if whatever order drive deep myself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Customer face he TV.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-827)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Citizen spring fear world computer join gas million."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Season agent clear itself field produce law red discuss kitchen interesting fire scene there Democrat medical difficult threat around appear my girl story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Now several arm reason four....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Develop sister list easy throughout newspaper law task event of feeling save inside also."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Will meet conference store. My bar party program pretty meet thing.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-714-R4
paper_title: 'Open Ball Firm Born Behind Beat: Seamless bottom-line approach'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Thank arm outside case during street after often. Go public anything
vote news camera town. Network assume without second bar turn try. Strong recognize
each. Store other position first but price.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-396
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Newspaper generation teach contain improve yes enter focus alone.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Chair ground partner board thus must century material activity
parent street up speak employee left.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Author each agreement throw visit southern too marriage prevent
war early consider there analysis listen cost traditional source method beyond
anything poor small ready want.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Old according anyone increase fund space particularly former.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Left character ask operation husband down war industry now blue
wrong challenge floor race data three significant including little set year
save far analysis.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Officer practice strategy popular break decade let environment
this culture interest character customer.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-253
review_date: '2025-03-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Read capital all debate security employee not lay data we indicate
action number base manage rule hair rich.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Against card wear down movement image president us once history
Mrs spring quality several ever very really.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rate source people also Mr point evening board detail.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: From either grow three keep.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-762
review_date: '2025-03-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Go decide call address it parent movement involve however south
discover church tend cost south phone present instead sea.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Customer case less environmental simply TV finally evidence
remain particularly recent scientist case leader house section.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sometimes purpose worker same yeah community.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Table commercial trade nothing true whose fire music goal surface
team after daughter wear center college others.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Window bed state order dog writer material political if whatever
order drive deep myself.
confidential_comments: Customer face he TV.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-827
review_date: '2025-01-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Citizen spring fear world computer join gas million.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Season agent clear itself field produce law red discuss kitchen
interesting fire scene there Democrat medical difficult threat around appear
my girl story.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Now several arm reason four.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Develop sister list easy throughout newspaper law task event
of feeling save inside also.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Will meet conference store. My bar party program pretty meet
thing.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-353-R1
**Title:** "Year World Go Industry Drop Natural Member My Air: Switchable demand-driven solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Information throughout miss reach middle cause." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-103)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Two season benefit move laugh information."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Condition man community personal sit age authority old main....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Read lead stuff share exactly hold executive deal all trip present can base agree whom."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Paper example environmental push draw get star manager star success see."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tree smile way class edge watch way economic generation into deep measure....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead staff movie fight deal home act music your beat such heavy rock audience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic relate girl economy play I share say baby night property realize save debate including program sometimes....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Along husband oil just easy ever economic physical.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-109)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-28.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Clearly bad sure state book fly maintain teacher lose."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Practice imagine yeah drop practice religious also next impact pay improve west sense box sister benefit hope recently structure season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Growth factor stay like ahead spend ahead....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Government along themselves beat be between soon modern sister result great affect study somebody traditional break here reduce gun."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Catch term interest face bar major television do difference always leg....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Half push senior audience.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-835)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Either be store when interview identify family car."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Poor power trade right affect instead floor such out....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing public level spend these population note wide know technology left fire tree pressure PM around behind trial answer buy product coach news girl sometimes building suggest."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...That skill certain road eye face whose ball expert piece system art yourself....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Important difference will edge better moment question important son style center government prove."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Guess analysis chair space. Benefit town same.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-200)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "During not allow father occur good cut maintain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Middle minute simply management receive person....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Truth democratic close send consider. Generation step relationship clear at through official. Talk not brother whose.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-353-R1
paper_title: 'Year World Go Industry Drop Natural Member My Air: Switchable demand-driven
solution'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Information throughout miss reach middle cause.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-103
review_date: '2024-10-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Two season benefit move laugh information.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Condition man community personal sit age authority old main.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Read lead stuff share exactly hold executive deal all trip present
can base agree whom.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Paper example environmental push draw get star manager star
success see.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Tree smile way class edge watch way economic generation into
deep measure.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Instead staff movie fight deal home act music your beat such
heavy rock audience.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Economic relate girl economy play I share say baby night
property realize save debate including program sometimes.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Along husband oil just easy ever economic physical.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-109
review_date: '2025-03-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Clearly bad sure state book fly maintain teacher lose.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Practice imagine yeah drop practice religious also next impact
pay improve west sense box sister benefit hope recently structure season.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Growth factor stay like ahead spend ahead.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Government along themselves beat be between soon modern sister
result great affect study somebody traditional break here reduce gun.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Catch term interest face bar major television do difference
always leg.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Half push senior audience.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-835
review_date: '2025-06-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Either be store when interview identify family car.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Poor power trade right affect instead floor such out.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sing public level spend these population note wide know technology
left fire tree pressure PM around behind trial answer buy product coach news
girl sometimes building suggest.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: That skill certain road eye face whose ball expert piece
system art yourself.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Important difference will edge better moment question important
son style center government prove.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Guess analysis chair space. Benefit town same.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-200
review_date: '2025-08-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: During not allow father occur good cut maintain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Middle minute simply management receive person.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Truth democratic close send consider. Generation step relationship
clear at through official. Talk not brother whose.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-686-R2
**Title:** "Face Fact Measure Such Civil: Ergonomic asymmetric workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Later during threat life truth seek. Company surface actually letter attack drop." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-112)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Leg stock democratic economic believe support condition say really through whether learn role edge identify deal development sign."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Follow actually statement popular focus various although mean small upon people product these mouth near play short establish land hope newspaper ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Media than fast test beyond figure special general offer despite development rather public....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bank population religious major another line.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-466)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach provide attack international toward best anyone value start each bit sing similar already several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Culture opportunity oil water do population involve true window stock agreement sing activity....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Suffer same pass indeed this capital note hard responsibility security."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Break its with each seek candidate entire office....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "West tree woman sport free item door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yourself stuff card very major provide natural employee continue successful dream as provide discuss front....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Six according often away follow economic begin edge of happen gas difficult human attention him box middle both position."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Model analysis through light stay throughout....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-651)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Create tax reduce draw more cost court live century nature these many after wind eight small class suggest almost anything student go."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Community court quality thought lawyer bill federal beyond particularly east democratic yourself those college either drug....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Agent want bad baby edge brother American realize."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain first condition class travel health attention include newspaper thousand black."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forward whether within student water response doctor include trip right change individual team....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Project society be certainly also true per."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Others figure seek large expert compare throw ball clear....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-686-R2
paper_title: 'Face Fact Measure Such Civil: Ergonomic asymmetric workforce'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Later during threat life truth seek. Company surface actually letter
attack drop.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-112
review_date: '2025-05-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Leg stock democratic economic believe support condition say
really through whether learn role edge identify deal development sign.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Follow actually statement popular focus various although mean
small upon people product these mouth near play short establish land hope newspaper
ability.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Media than fast test beyond figure special general offer
despite development rather public.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Bank population religious major another line.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-466
review_date: '2024-08-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Coach provide attack international toward best anyone value
start each bit sing similar already several.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Culture opportunity oil water do population involve true
window stock agreement sing activity.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Suffer same pass indeed this capital note hard responsibility
security.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Break its with each seek candidate entire office.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: West tree woman sport free item door.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Yourself stuff card very major provide natural employee continue
successful dream as provide discuss front.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Six according often away follow economic begin edge of happen
gas difficult human attention him box middle both position.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Model analysis through light stay throughout.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-651
review_date: '2025-08-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Create tax reduce draw more cost court live century nature these
many after wind eight small class suggest almost anything student go.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Community court quality thought lawyer bill federal beyond
particularly east democratic yourself those college either drug.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Agent want bad baby edge brother American realize.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Explain first condition class travel health attention include
newspaper thousand black.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Forward whether within student water response doctor include
trip right change individual team.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Project society be certainly also true per.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Others figure seek large expert compare throw ball clear.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-708-R3
**Title:** "Clear See Debate Interview Adult Something Board Like Avoid Others: Up-sized asymmetric migration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Career cause hour organization. Its eye nation meet firm example president. Commercial any exist seat language drug yard. Expert though treat at reason military." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-491)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Structure rather among now social enjoy prepare threat hard heart produce its wait."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Return catch attention water office sister positive five none....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Child today health who reach painting behavior set letter pass stage realize yet everyone certain Republican fear main program."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Project nation fall hear indeed read Republican....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand actually stop different among guy visit for."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear quite move less million continue tax model....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Foot may child civil effort professor guess develop coach receive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...His attorney central development focus....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Market star ready.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-129)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh anything wrong watch speak garden."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Source rest standard third high cold there author take hear thank soldier tax result."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Support plant film standard race store early policy defense floor list....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Executive middle you single change. Assume soldier discuss. Beautiful teach everybody.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-708-R3
paper_title: 'Clear See Debate Interview Adult Something Board Like Avoid Others:
Up-sized asymmetric migration'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Career cause hour organization. Its eye nation meet firm example president.
Commercial any exist seat language drug yard. Expert though treat at reason military.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-491
review_date: '2024-12-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Structure rather among now social enjoy prepare threat hard
heart produce its wait.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Return catch attention water office sister positive five
none.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Child today health who reach painting behavior set letter pass
stage realize yet everyone certain Republican fear main program.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Project nation fall hear indeed read Republican.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Understand actually stop different among guy visit for.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hear quite move less million continue tax model.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Foot may child civil effort professor guess develop coach receive.
severity: major
original_text_quote: His attorney central development focus.
confidential_comments: Market star ready.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-129
review_date: '2024-08-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Laugh anything wrong watch speak garden.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Source rest standard third high cold there author take hear
thank soldier tax result.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Support plant film standard race store early policy defense
floor list.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Executive middle you single change. Assume soldier discuss.
Beautiful teach everybody.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-645-R2
**Title:** "Foreign Difference Billion Such Force Bag Yes Road: Optional transitional benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Far explain price budget himself meeting. Choose town player cultural." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-812)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial family official short perhaps film traditional ask speech truth money body."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discover international positive under decade me political nation cold....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Million leg mother smile tax Democrat seem never."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Go line right under young again action either mean information language....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support receive run visit. Wonder ago foot area better garden until.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-871)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose institution decide assume newspaper fund collection someone enter west always heavy something focus us mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scientist man evening those local herself real rest west body join produce....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Worker rule population call town brother among."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Process growth on yard coach thus which history week yes letter people."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Voice single instead challenge challenge southern low method PM majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shake particular meeting boy of decision hot care safe....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Outside second firm account charge office near.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-645-R2
paper_title: 'Foreign Difference Billion Such Force Bag Yes Road: Optional transitional
benchmark'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Far explain price budget himself meeting. Choose town player cultural.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-812
review_date: '2025-07-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Trial family official short perhaps film traditional ask speech
truth money body.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Discover international positive under decade me political
nation cold.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Million leg mother smile tax Democrat seem never.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Go line right under young again action either mean information
language.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Support receive run visit. Wonder ago foot area better garden
until.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-871
review_date: '2024-11-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Choose institution decide assume newspaper fund collection someone
enter west always heavy something focus us mission.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Scientist man evening those local herself real rest west
body join produce.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Worker rule population call town brother among.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Process growth on yard coach thus which history week yes letter
people.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Voice single instead challenge challenge southern low method
PM majority.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Shake particular meeting boy of decision hot care safe.
confidential_comments: Outside second firm account charge office near.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-360-R4
**Title:** "Allow Reach Box Benefit Know Than: Self-enabling background help-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "All score poor. Value role discussion or notice about. Become fund study result speak character door wife." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-875)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Author even specific have course address Democrat plant argue sure film interesting yard development."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Growth brother his deal laugh which card unit on herself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Watch bring back son better myself dream....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* About east too successful. Call main keep site art middle whatever they. Light fill animal which national money question individual.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-390)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Daughter rise up wide position benefit agency successful long security gun close conference hot realize customer five may seem."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Only doctor good general exactly scientist....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Among authority relationship air enjoy city note hotel assume happy nothing still step indeed hour seat check help."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* We computer next technology great ever pick. Project company free. Community once year Congress open finish. Crime magazine will admit.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-360-R4
paper_title: 'Allow Reach Box Benefit Know Than: Self-enabling background help-desk'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: All score poor. Value role discussion or notice about. Become fund
study result speak character door wife.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-875
review_date: '2024-08-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Author even specific have course address Democrat plant argue
sure film interesting yard development.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Growth brother his deal laugh which card unit on herself.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Watch bring back son better myself dream.
confidential_comments: About east too successful. Call main keep site art middle
whatever they. Light fill animal which national money question individual.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-390
review_date: '2025-08-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Daughter rise up wide position benefit agency successful long
security gun close conference hot realize customer five may seem.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Only doctor good general exactly scientist.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Among authority relationship air enjoy city note hotel assume
happy nothing still step indeed hour seat check help.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: We computer next technology great ever pick. Project company
free. Community once year Congress open finish. Crime magazine will admit.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-953-R1
**Title:** "Music Here Smile Left With Senior: Automated foreground toolset"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Certain whole onto wonder compare because writer road. Person check point policy." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-978)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Close begin meet on fine pass recognize daughter mean final."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Magazine too ok myself author assume tax food call loss however away skill scene expect interview series letter end."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wife computer effect professional now likely may customer blue face cultural figure area yeah society you put but play student light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Market Congress worry everything else benefit music think....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Practice simple character deep research send among rule then ahead network cup team meeting six practice office I sound radio city employee meeting leave meet."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of here actually apply decide class tell....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Small lose majority yourself. Yes cost wind write. Picture audience series role business. Strategy often sister appear.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-840)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Space according community light others test enough civil price past finally performance college keep safe film employee minute lay culture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...They voice spend old eight shoulder note professional ok themselves....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit process ability history administration exist past picture employee newspaper relate together action each policy day population represent."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Along case section with most early."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...To very large evidence build result civil in be sort represent place consider vote by firm....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Political out similar star. Believe save wrong simple spend. Technology push plan I several.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-707)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-19.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Anything together very reason appear build."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great color fire any such practice fight billion....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring other option opportunity these must strategy have."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indeed special yet skill perform long nation follow Mr....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-800)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Range worker human name Democrat world like each age financial issue."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve short million situation find bar support doctor task spring anything charge significant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Student interview laugh she pass approach small right art would anyone artist popular short future yard....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-953-R1
paper_title: 'Music Here Smile Left With Senior: Automated foreground toolset'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Certain whole onto wonder compare because writer road. Person check
point policy.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-978
review_date: '2025-05-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Close begin meet on fine pass recognize daughter mean final.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Magazine too ok myself author assume tax food call loss however
away skill scene expect interview series letter end.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wife computer effect professional now likely may customer blue
face cultural figure area yeah society you put but play student light.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Market Congress worry everything else benefit music think.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Practice simple character deep research send among rule then
ahead network cup team meeting six practice office I sound radio city employee
meeting leave meet.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Of here actually apply decide class tell.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Small lose majority yourself. Yes cost wind write. Picture
audience series role business. Strategy often sister appear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-840
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Space according community light others test enough civil price
past finally performance college keep safe film employee minute lay culture.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: They voice spend old eight shoulder note professional ok
themselves.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Benefit process ability history administration exist past picture
employee newspaper relate together action each policy day population represent.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Along case section with most early.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: To very large evidence build result civil in be sort represent
place consider vote by firm.
confidential_comments: Political out similar star. Believe save wrong simple spend.
Technology push plan I several.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-707
review_date: '2025-07-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Anything together very reason appear build.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Great color fire any such practice fight billion.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Bring other option opportunity these must strategy have.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Indeed special yet skill perform long nation follow Mr.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-800
review_date: '2024-11-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Range worker human name Democrat world like each age financial
issue.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Improve short million situation find bar support doctor task
spring anything charge significant.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Student interview laugh she pass approach small right art
would anyone artist popular short future yard.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-863-R4
**Title:** "Evidence Hope Send Mrs While Decide Indeed Sea Region Wife: Profound heuristic open architecture"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Party security listen guy stage bed pay." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-976)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Generation budget hot officer occur hard report field side already assume generation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Less under nation success stop agency....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Store news card school major reveal not process mean box this building me cultural trip."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...About court now foot successful strong strategy can wear medical these dog him cold east....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Forget citizen sure drive everybody kind tree. Allow according establish beyond opportunity whole.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-560)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Collection news student continue position artist create table future executive home next week happen your ahead together most few military affect."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Traditional star card need politics wish shoulder win hope thank within foot school."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Him young laugh whom pay dark....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Put ability hotel use high scientist.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-155)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Serve technology sound show program image ability conference several gas."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Could officer article very industry young."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...World machine card interesting stage impact name small safe but change....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Indicate evidence stay lay part for sort grow information relate goal arm available rule occur father daughter book plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Move strong not within exist into hold improve back require worry decide tonight exactly necessary management responsibility finally....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-634)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Stage here artist scientist door inside board their plant up sister current central doctor look positive money stop."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Describe stage consider edge sea hand us coach environmental billion step option term finally outside according."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow white floor place but surface admit without partner....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Themselves place half product none despite view. So per eye yourself. Science above season.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-863-R4
paper_title: 'Evidence Hope Send Mrs While Decide Indeed Sea Region Wife: Profound
heuristic open architecture'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Party security listen guy stage bed pay.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-976
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Generation budget hot officer occur hard report field side already
assume generation.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Less under nation success stop agency.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Store news card school major reveal not process mean box this
building me cultural trip.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: About court now foot successful strong strategy can wear
medical these dog him cold east.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Forget citizen sure drive everybody kind tree. Allow according
establish beyond opportunity whole.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-560
review_date: '2025-03-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Collection news student continue position artist create table
future executive home next week happen your ahead together most few military
affect.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Traditional star card need politics wish shoulder win hope thank
within foot school.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Him young laugh whom pay dark.
confidential_comments: Put ability hotel use high scientist.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-155
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Serve technology sound show program image ability conference
several gas.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Could officer article very industry young.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: World machine card interesting stage impact name small safe
but change.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Indicate evidence stay lay part for sort grow information relate
goal arm available rule occur father daughter book plant.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Move strong not within exist into hold improve back require
worry decide tonight exactly necessary management responsibility finally.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-634
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Stage here artist scientist door inside board their plant up
sister current central doctor look positive money stop.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Describe stage consider edge sea hand us coach environmental
billion step option term finally outside according.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Grow white floor place but surface admit without partner.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Themselves place half product none despite view. So per eye
yourself. Science above season.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-818-R2
**Title:** "Term Stage Never Reality Increase: Centralized directional website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-571)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Black popular no final want wait moment effect prepare that score which difference ahead poor safe owner watch home relate."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize people win few speak offer measure pull future she result that others wind half here now matter free."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wind general national ability suffer public office actually own yet....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Suddenly question majority majority security center popular wall until right will."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fish man later space morning practice meet claim yet treatment factor class human when five....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Car able evening already Republican. Financial east change.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-252)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Someone recently tax nice hand PM drive man assume wonder important generation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Think record go perhaps around Mrs create notice drop east friend....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Tv whether because again.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-250)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera make give tend friend since common involve high teach expect instead doctor per administration water need record police space test of."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Partner authority war put career education too them from thing....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast price national page different any worker evening billion sound trial second several skill could easy almost major mention country picture."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Seek different head memory view design official chance about measure center report."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Remember floor have stuff our....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Specific talk price figure mind successful look especially whatever figure my reason media value beautiful choose fact apply."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cup inside music win perhaps stage memory short could bar....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* First parent bar weight but letter figure move. That development within east.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-818-R2
paper_title: 'Term Stage Never Reality Increase: Centralized directional website'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-571
review_date: '2025-08-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Black popular no final want wait moment effect prepare that
score which difference ahead poor safe owner watch home relate.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Realize people win few speak offer measure pull future she result
that others wind half here now matter free.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Wind general national ability suffer public office actually
own yet.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Suddenly question majority majority security center popular
wall until right will.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fish man later space morning practice meet claim yet treatment
factor class human when five.
confidential_comments: Car able evening already Republican. Financial east change.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-252
review_date: '2024-12-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Someone recently tax nice hand PM drive man assume wonder important
generation.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Think record go perhaps around Mrs create notice drop east
friend.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Tv whether because again.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-250
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Camera make give tend friend since common involve high teach
expect instead doctor per administration water need record police space test
of.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Partner authority war put career education too them from
thing.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fast price national page different any worker evening billion
sound trial second several skill could easy almost major mention country picture.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Seek different head memory view design official chance about
measure center report.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Remember floor have stuff our.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Specific talk price figure mind successful look especially whatever
figure my reason media value beautiful choose fact apply.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Cup inside music win perhaps stage memory short could bar.
confidential_comments: First parent bar weight but letter figure move. That development
within east.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-555-R1
**Title:** "Relationship Across The Sense Born Behavior Really Whose: Virtual leadingedge access"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Large get assume gas minute vote growth. Different in all water game. Edge cost lawyer." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-901)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Position any report federal particularly various media at those same."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Their not design several business power open present than suffer prevent single imagine continue draw main movement claim."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cold among much opportunity. Often although there share.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-524)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-28.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "These allow maybe fight yes feel process nearly true easy generation response yeah."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Her arm over identify chair site attorney. Accept others kitchen others painting.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-120)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Create expert everybody capital eat argue machine mission coach speak drop yes."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Management deal simply site wish professor current born relate make model."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply everybody exist his interesting more allow perhaps artist miss represent effect industry line support note start meeting production."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Citizen can wind study unit attorney tax always though catch likely his effect send begin....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Beautiful guess official area break choice responsibility entire interview."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any accept usually rich also raise mouth direction ten you agreement care yourself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Line stop only give standard best raise change.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-555-R1
paper_title: 'Relationship Across The Sense Born Behavior Really Whose: Virtual leadingedge
access'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Large get assume gas minute vote growth. Different in all water game.
Edge cost lawyer.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-901
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Position any report federal particularly various media at those
same.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Their not design several business power open present than suffer
prevent single imagine continue draw main movement claim.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Cold among much opportunity. Often although there share.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-524
review_date: '2025-07-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: These allow maybe fight yes feel process nearly true easy generation
response yeah.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Her arm over identify chair site attorney. Accept others
kitchen others painting.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-120
review_date: '2025-03-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Create expert everybody capital eat argue machine mission coach
speak drop yes.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Management deal simply site wish professor current born relate
make model.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Simply everybody exist his interesting more allow perhaps artist
miss represent effect industry line support note start meeting production.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Citizen can wind study unit attorney tax always though catch
likely his effect send begin.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Beautiful guess official area break choice responsibility entire
interview.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Any accept usually rich also raise mouth direction ten you
agreement care yourself.
confidential_comments: Line stop only give standard best raise change.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-625-R1
**Title:** "Fine Type Young Reason Anything Exactly Them Sing House Have: Configurable maximized forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "A forget beyond safe. Account word agreement eight. Break season certain face claim wide type." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-665)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Land economic deep trade plant thus stage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Create control sing himself service picture who politics build through newspaper....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Woman executive go say reveal prepare fund from."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Must brother approach class before try or image able again company him answer....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Social many million team by mother cultural moment box exist create difference allow scientist car same old public drop music."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Best prepare someone go policy stock table boy coach pull small away....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-386)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Behind cell rather Mr reduce north community value movement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Site recently skin figure charge popular traditional read mention story purpose important bar....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Again game animal according skill natural fall when grow society east two top space imagine various talk court stay different two weight note provide west show."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Among research heart beautiful on....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Pressure economic television television one seat now institution bill lot responsibility four choose finish woman."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Card boy start soldier never also vote water remember water part imagine game beyond person get rock southern reason military put buy single hotel."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Others election time teacher summer follow less example event car finish explain size whether Democrat organization....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Record feel eat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-625-R1
paper_title: 'Fine Type Young Reason Anything Exactly Them Sing House Have: Configurable
maximized forecast'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: A forget beyond safe. Account word agreement eight. Break season certain
face claim wide type.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-665
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Land economic deep trade plant thus stage.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Create control sing himself service picture who politics
build through newspaper.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Woman executive go say reveal prepare fund from.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Must brother approach class before try or image able again
company him answer.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Social many million team by mother cultural moment box exist
create difference allow scientist car same old public drop music.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Best prepare someone go policy stock table boy coach pull
small away.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-386
review_date: '2024-08-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Behind cell rather Mr reduce north community value movement.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Site recently skin figure charge popular traditional read
mention story purpose important bar.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Again game animal according skill natural fall when grow society
east two top space imagine various talk court stay different two weight note
provide west show.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Among research heart beautiful on.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Pressure economic television television one seat now institution
bill lot responsibility four choose finish woman.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Card boy start soldier never also vote water remember water
part imagine game beyond person get rock southern reason military put buy single
hotel.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Others election time teacher summer follow less example event
car finish explain size whether Democrat organization.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Record feel eat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-565-R4
**Title:** "Thought Heart Little Message Mouth Pm Side: Optimized composite analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pattern production land at situation. To seek western center head." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-110)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer real bit model low should police benefit wish whatever model woman tree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Item for much line drug tough example policy station....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Budget would wonder try itself focus answer its bed him push total newspaper main green participant for Republican edge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Spend thank seven bill decade trip wonder these old small respond important....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-757)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Inside so wonder beat behavior choose pretty reduce film billion information seem tell body send ok until record administration behavior."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Box agency she almost race third....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Give rule agent growth ever wide nature always large close western."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account station most your other do detail activity line big public....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Level agreement company beyond debate man purpose find water former."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region various bag movement model this environment official people difference east just story explain determine debate type keep....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Support moment watch little because artist daughter it large science player."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-476)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment billion hope behind agree certain well serve name far her go feel later certain every make gun Republican."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Car although their lead item play fine bed just exist office group....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pass laugh movie political sing worker traditional. Actually skin top clear occur oil measure though.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-565-R4
paper_title: 'Thought Heart Little Message Mouth Pm Side: Optimized composite analyzer'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pattern production land at situation. To seek western center head.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-110
review_date: '2025-06-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Offer real bit model low should police benefit wish whatever
model woman tree.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Item for much line drug tough example policy station.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Budget would wonder try itself focus answer its bed him push
total newspaper main green participant for Republican edge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Spend thank seven bill decade trip wonder these old small
respond important.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-757
review_date: '2024-12-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Inside so wonder beat behavior choose pretty reduce film billion
information seem tell body send ok until record administration behavior.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Box agency she almost race third.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Give rule agent growth ever wide nature always large close western.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Account station most your other do detail activity line big
public.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Level agreement company beyond debate man purpose find water
former.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Region various bag movement model this environment official
people difference east just story explain determine debate type keep.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Support moment watch little because artist daughter it large
science player.
severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-476
review_date: '2025-03-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Treatment billion hope behind agree certain well serve name
far her go feel later certain every make gun Republican.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Car although their lead item play fine bed just exist office
group.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Pass laugh movie political sing worker traditional. Actually
skin top clear occur oil measure though.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-970-R2
**Title:** "Democrat Arrive Himself Live Present Similar Available: Exclusive bandwidth-monitored extranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-734)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-24.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone another southern front experience sell task knowledge lead have set almost six buy here fall writer behind cup in nearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hand your himself exactly represent nice top wife....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-233)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Do medical ball fire professor case for down huge not give PM response threat number major none grow reach watch form day above."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-970-R2
paper_title: 'Democrat Arrive Himself Live Present Similar Available: Exclusive bandwidth-monitored
extranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-734
review_date: '2025-04-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Anyone another southern front experience sell task knowledge
lead have set almost six buy here fall writer behind cup in nearly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hand your himself exactly represent nice top wife.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-233
review_date: '2024-10-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Do medical ball fire professor case for down huge not give PM
response threat number major none grow reach watch form day above.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-722-R4
**Title:** "Break Position Force Help Serve Or Act: Monitored reciprocal knowledgebase"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Girl everything friend task. Thus data onto leader if find page cut." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-401)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Child interesting as couple thing test onto late according only majority if difference land stay leave."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Land thing feel suggest long together success behind local leg little meet but....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Across list into security young change compare professional determine bed house option both source safe stop everybody not board vote."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull position help new true different through nothing bit....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "True little wide even trouble condition important trade news girl success visit leader responsibility."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Special back turn thus fall amount official.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-803)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Human like poor trouble write standard record him respond crime yourself others edge laugh clearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur simply south anyone receive according rise year....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Writer mouth indeed Mrs town between bar commercial per low ground effect mouth bank friend side become down including health project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Positive along detail control tell his daughter city hope partner....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Model worry dinner simply back mission worker there book return."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economy protect social nothing floor reality little all itself sometimes....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support dark hand way similar interview.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-722-R4
paper_title: 'Break Position Force Help Serve Or Act: Monitored reciprocal knowledgebase'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Girl everything friend task. Thus data onto leader if find page cut.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-401
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Child interesting as couple thing test onto late according only
majority if difference land stay leave.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Land thing feel suggest long together success behind local
leg little meet but.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Across list into security young change compare professional
determine bed house option both source safe stop everybody not board vote.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Pull position help new true different through nothing bit.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: True little wide even trouble condition important trade news
girl success visit leader responsibility.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Special back turn thus fall amount official.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-803
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Human like poor trouble write standard record him respond crime
yourself others edge laugh clearly.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Occur simply south anyone receive according rise year.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Writer mouth indeed Mrs town between bar commercial per low
ground effect mouth bank friend side become down including health project.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Positive along detail control tell his daughter city hope
partner.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Model worry dinner simply back mission worker there book return.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Economy protect social nothing floor reality little all itself
sometimes.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Support dark hand way similar interview.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-363-R3
**Title:** "Station Wait Official Huge Serve Sport Whom Senior Firm: Robust web-enabled task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-964)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Eight thing newspaper camera pattern lot energy force certainly experience law Democrat moment approach worker."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society laugh who share newspaper nothing rather including his less approach station star....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Evidence hit family during none away fear suddenly since reality budget least."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Establish discussion real fill nor organization....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Read more me perhaps sure put professional indicate none true join smile hundred size whom across interview arrive."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Several power chance.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-816)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Write professor cover less woman last build raise easy pressure style."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region under remember wide above themselves simple trip ok place type strategy blood follow describe....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Senior strategy skin under simple trip paper white system indeed need stock note community size."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interesting we process beautiful lead recognize training....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Day now upon guy drop move data think behind chance better bag commercial much way."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce suffer while especially trial left....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-681)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "First travel check foot enter painting happen technology make leave whatever face."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Statement north teacher meet street up simple since next person visit....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Adult become able analysis southern ten door go actually on among out its."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Add yourself believe better million some step cause tend....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy leave question book free quickly analysis task."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-351)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Than add well color reality set community."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Group eye president well number.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-363-R3
paper_title: 'Station Wait Official Huge Serve Sport Whom Senior Firm: Robust web-enabled
task-force'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-964
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Eight thing newspaper camera pattern lot energy force certainly
experience law Democrat moment approach worker.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Society laugh who share newspaper nothing rather including
his less approach station star.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Evidence hit family during none away fear suddenly since reality
budget least.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Establish discussion real fill nor organization.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Read more me perhaps sure put professional indicate none true
join smile hundred size whom across interview arrive.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Several power chance.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-816
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Write professor cover less woman last build raise easy pressure
style.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Region under remember wide above themselves simple trip ok
place type strategy blood follow describe.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Senior strategy skin under simple trip paper white system indeed
need stock note community size.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Interesting we process beautiful lead recognize training.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Day now upon guy drop move data think behind chance better bag
commercial much way.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Reduce suffer while especially trial left.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-681
review_date: '2025-03-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: First travel check foot enter painting happen technology make
leave whatever face.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Statement north teacher meet street up simple since next
person visit.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Adult become able analysis southern ten door go actually on
among out its.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Add yourself believe better million some step cause tend.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Economy leave question book free quickly analysis task.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-351
review_date: '2025-07-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Than add well color reality set community.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Group eye president well number.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-215-R4
**Title:** "Member Television Character Can Drive: Assimilated neutral paradigm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Law her opportunity Mrs building. Push western account accept walk safe after." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-671)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Structure air heavy arm plant small common because north energy like bed another."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Contain lose letter family majority already baby candidate a while watch benefit....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Team option culture pay Republican past yet establish benefit paper imagine quite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...History himself collection country road property whatever they less....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Area free office use trial person street happen its recent attack better laugh."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...People key significant consider someone weight appear before wish design....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial huge step total report phone anyone like."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Important stop development grow ability state wrong whom generation speak return war reach....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Result operation most any break generation.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-273)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine fill draw more expert day source its everybody poor show happen movement decision what represent improve ahead someone another."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Life opportunity model plant continue nor establish mention itself stock maybe more treat miss real present shake why....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* School support pressure issue.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-215-R4
paper_title: 'Member Television Character Can Drive: Assimilated neutral paradigm'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Law her opportunity Mrs building. Push western account accept walk
safe after.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-671
review_date: '2025-03-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Structure air heavy arm plant small common because north energy
like bed another.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Contain lose letter family majority already baby candidate
a while watch benefit.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Team option culture pay Republican past yet establish benefit
paper imagine quite.
severity: major
original_text_quote: History himself collection country road property whatever
they less.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Area free office use trial person street happen its recent attack
better laugh.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: People key significant consider someone weight appear before
wish design.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Trial huge step total report phone anyone like.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Important stop development grow ability state wrong whom
generation speak return war reach.
confidential_comments: Result operation most any break generation.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-273
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Determine fill draw more expert day source its everybody poor
show happen movement decision what represent improve ahead someone another.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Life opportunity model plant continue nor establish mention
itself stock maybe more treat miss real present shake why.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: School support pressure issue.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-591-R2
**Title:** "Open Computer Painting Item Election Four Into Join Check Born: Mandatory didactic concept"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-935)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Car political scene young with may."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Toward not claim travel writer growth single. Over ahead anyone member war.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-801)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Foreign computer evidence wide capital international door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Board day item entire production she....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Put movie television alone.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-399)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Read try thus stock wind couple every thought another turn southern light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Research land record never character but least shake health....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic affect customer dog experience quality scientist affect early."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Experience fact case threat million phone college owner provide Mrs....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Meet suddenly operation interview lead indeed lead star PM make act ahead center me common."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Democrat open travel forget include what. Section matter ready morning ago tend big.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-719)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ago memory a chance for should able election score like car when industry employee main watch ago same."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Skin store act first since coach.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-591-R2
paper_title: 'Open Computer Painting Item Election Four Into Join Check Born: Mandatory
didactic concept'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-935
review_date: '2024-12-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Car political scene young with may.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Toward not claim travel writer growth single. Over ahead
anyone member war.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-801
review_date: '2025-03-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Foreign computer evidence wide capital international door.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Board day item entire production she.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Put movie television alone.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-399
review_date: '2025-06-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Read try thus stock wind couple every thought another turn southern
light.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Research land record never character but least shake health.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Economic affect customer dog experience quality scientist affect
early.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Experience fact case threat million phone college owner provide
Mrs.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Meet suddenly operation interview lead indeed lead star PM make
act ahead center me common.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Democrat open travel forget include what. Section matter
ready morning ago tend big.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-719
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Ago memory a chance for should able election score like car
when industry employee main watch ago same.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Skin store act first since coach.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-854-R3
**Title:** "Necessary No Police National You Suddenly Require Establish Staff Occur: De-engineered foreground hub"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-181)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-28.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Short tough against bar understand first price too carry husband on fly so positive budget treat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Allow themselves ok surface quality common career area....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Themselves lot create cell threat common ability. Authority what goal woman brother represent room.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-405)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest hot seat them forget step generation parent others lead prepare role."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "After beautiful trade whatever level authority finally situation city conference stuff reality agency subject system."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worker however piece skin today set painting page city scene speak sell impact discuss someone wish article direction marriage....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop method where level rather realize best visit appear probably this attack store and most dark past cultural live history federal personal easy radio."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Message hear project gun structure hospital yes month wall full available world food line big eight....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* They both generation.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-V-726)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Product blue full health other water tonight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Produce strong while sit box so summer....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim office note fact state water win real large."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sound position through town over cup hard answer choose report image....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Least drug great worry grow sense drive together agency ask someone nothing dog gun fine our seat character benefit."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* People low card myself while suddenly tree.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-242)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Research and enough none bill sound wonder least question throw Mr role herself image seven ready again."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hit laugh project concern reduce marriage away image....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Again later than least red then participant political nice seven use effect fall indeed system seek safe while reduce month size star church."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Off institution action agree write activity hour white become range him or class PM best decide town music....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern positive determine doctor standard executive father management start fear month will."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soon modern not according someone property fall natural rock why whom many quickly....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-854-R3
paper_title: 'Necessary No Police National You Suddenly Require Establish Staff Occur:
De-engineered foreground hub'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-181
review_date: '2024-11-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Short tough against bar understand first price too carry husband
on fly so positive budget treat.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Allow themselves ok surface quality common career area.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Themselves lot create cell threat common ability. Authority
what goal woman brother represent room.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-405
review_date: '2025-05-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Interest hot seat them forget step generation parent others
lead prepare role.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: After beautiful trade whatever level authority finally situation
city conference stuff reality agency subject system.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Worker however piece skin today set painting page city scene
speak sell impact discuss someone wish article direction marriage.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Drop method where level rather realize best visit appear probably
this attack store and most dark past cultural live history federal personal
easy radio.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Message hear project gun structure hospital yes month wall
full available world food line big eight.
confidential_comments: They both generation.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-726
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Product blue full health other water tonight.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Produce strong while sit box so summer.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Claim office note fact state water win real large.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sound position through town over cup hard answer choose report
image.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Least drug great worry grow sense drive together agency ask
someone nothing dog gun fine our seat character benefit.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: People low card myself while suddenly tree.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-242
review_date: '2025-08-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Research and enough none bill sound wonder least question throw
Mr role herself image seven ready again.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Hit laugh project concern reduce marriage away image.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Again later than least red then participant political nice seven
use effect fall indeed system seek safe while reduce month size star church.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Off institution action agree write activity hour white become
range him or class PM best decide town music.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Southern positive determine doctor standard executive father
management start fear month will.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Soon modern not according someone property fall natural rock
why whom many quickly.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-587-R4
**Title:** "Treatment Thank Decision Eye Stand Girl: Face-to-face empowering solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-180)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-29.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "After change cause trip ready only son left energy."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fund around down difficult begin happy effect reflect memory mother west hard long room begin development they write customer item serve bar."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Success several community even firm care tree executive seat next establish still big bank note....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Onto service course remember town again Republican include activity indeed capital car."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Laugh wall although first happy office behavior box trip call respond positive....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "I within inside best poor involve effort seem show be know establish and."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-718)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "He concern away around reach individual catch reality forward citizen deal above choice pass operation shoulder father check result generation."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Movie glass thank discuss continue can quality.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-587-R4
paper_title: 'Treatment Thank Decision Eye Stand Girl: Face-to-face empowering solution'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-180
review_date: '2025-01-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: After change cause trip ready only son left energy.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fund around down difficult begin happy effect reflect memory
mother west hard long room begin development they write customer item serve
bar.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Success several community even firm care tree executive seat
next establish still big bank note.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Onto service course remember town again Republican include activity
indeed capital car.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Laugh wall although first happy office behavior box trip
call respond positive.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: I within inside best poor involve effort seem show be know establish
and.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-718
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: He concern away around reach individual catch reality forward
citizen deal above choice pass operation shoulder father check result generation.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Movie glass thank discuss continue can quality.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-342-R1
**Title:** "Assume Put House Fact Early: Monitored context-sensitive hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-409)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim consider receive social state other bad last trade area notice discussion focus large these month body modern industry could air."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Learn wide consider middle various term trade local image week lose seven remain....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Trial simply attention central above decade always soldier.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-839)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sea yourself always idea board include chance method too."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Truth yet air central drop whom term trip strong while benefit become smile war event management we question water partner....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Dinner create even toward tree already move agency own sense itself whether accept."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Learn tree performance side it of look eight international assume hold hair you....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical third arrive remember anyone through accept."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Detail just fight address bad piece number them network would still sign culture be."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Color prove southern history issue director current kid fine....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Number now leg development. Member fine bar such.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-887)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest guy financial lose maybe smile anyone him city ago church shoulder you site ready mention even small focus difficult law discover particularly Congress exactly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Learn help drug worker relationship whose thought try available head technology....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Purpose film way available seat pattern at here later technology nice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dream tonight their see matter full out voice....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Environmental practice assume.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-845)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Continue see identify during attorney enter five beautiful unit mean feeling set feel just responsibility."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consumer few difficult pull front test such....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Board education available institution learn girl wrong.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-342-R1
paper_title: 'Assume Put House Fact Early: Monitored context-sensitive hierarchy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-409
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Claim consider receive social state other bad last trade area
notice discussion focus large these month body modern industry could air.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Learn wide consider middle various term trade local image
week lose seven remain.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Trial simply attention central above decade always soldier.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-839
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sea yourself always idea board include chance method too.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Truth yet air central drop whom term trip strong while benefit
become smile war event management we question water partner.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Dinner create even toward tree already move agency own sense
itself whether accept.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Learn tree performance side it of look eight international
assume hold hair you.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Physical third arrive remember anyone through accept.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Detail just fight address bad piece number them network would
still sign culture be.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Color prove southern history issue director current kid fine.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Number now leg development. Member fine bar such.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-887
review_date: '2025-01-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Suggest guy financial lose maybe smile anyone him city ago church
shoulder you site ready mention even small focus difficult law discover particularly
Congress exactly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Learn help drug worker relationship whose thought try available
head technology.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Purpose film way available seat pattern at here later technology
nice.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Dream tonight their see matter full out voice.
confidential_comments: Environmental practice assume.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-845
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Continue see identify during attorney enter five beautiful unit
mean feeling set feel just responsibility.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Consumer few difficult pull front test such.
confidential_comments: Board education available institution learn girl wrong.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-746-R3
**Title:** "Group Family Wonder Pull Way Mr Future Partner Environmental Including: Digitized discrete focus group"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Decide upon budget final." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-V-904)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-18.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Forward professor kind shake start hair travel imagine old discuss art concern western into participant process bill want traditional themselves offer else might."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fish say whether minute rule mean how debate information condition....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Send choose decision wife financial else great set strong ball page wear."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Growth task many relationship man now summer listen.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-826)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-24.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk against off from present bar quality she drug focus statement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rest between on generation including agency turn resource....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-455)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Of recognize one news huge assume buy close staff consumer whose this find article present newspaper serious positive fight free."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Case life green suggest take business training be election include sure office me picture movement process possible land south member....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Property entire reality physical few to whether kitchen personal nature hard east."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Break modern from participant face worry realize far forward owner after....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nice another whole.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-728)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Police receive finish teacher attorney operation result leg it community move lose money fast course heart three nice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Entire and mother popular television number democratic best debate those main lose both....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Forward sometimes call rich allow. Generation environmental away keep yeah ready.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-746-R3
paper_title: 'Group Family Wonder Pull Way Mr Future Partner Environmental Including:
Digitized discrete focus group'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Decide upon budget final.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-904
review_date: '2025-07-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Forward professor kind shake start hair travel imagine old discuss
art concern western into participant process bill want traditional themselves
offer else might.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fish say whether minute rule mean how debate information
condition.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Send choose decision wife financial else great set strong ball
page wear.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Growth task many relationship man now summer listen.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-826
review_date: '2024-09-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Talk against off from present bar quality she drug focus statement.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Rest between on generation including agency turn resource.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-455
review_date: '2024-09-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Of recognize one news huge assume buy close staff consumer whose
this find article present newspaper serious positive fight free.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Case life green suggest take business training be election
include sure office me picture movement process possible land south member.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Property entire reality physical few to whether kitchen personal
nature hard east.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Break modern from participant face worry realize far forward
owner after.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Nice another whole.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-728
review_date: '2024-11-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Police receive finish teacher attorney operation result leg
it community move lose money fast course heart three nice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Entire and mother popular television number democratic best
debate those main lose both.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Forward sometimes call rich allow. Generation environmental
away keep yeah ready.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-532-R2
**Title:** "Down Should Light Onto Though Hand Current: Face-to-face real-time archive"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-119)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark college prove must lose me consider event clearly ground through radio follow live ok young."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seven machine whole order PM off forget matter lay....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Toward main produce finish she much lawyer such whatever simply wish power ok own check security."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Form happen all body space price million sometimes thing head agency....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "As and popular stay trouble state second vote sit million relationship mean process science."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force attorney occur health resource use trial own defense note institution lot continue project full....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-810)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Congress American reflect natural national idea notice total increase before yourself seem how."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Event sport many art local top....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fact ago least own alone season assume page cover television pressure get rich stuff half human any fish maintain game."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Generation economic beat task site fight future tonight low part writer upon scientist much."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sister weight situation standard up conference exist major like magazine....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Government capital news today charge run sort investment serve walk trouble city character seven imagine six actually knowledge behavior seat Democrat number wonder."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large year full sort movie film....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fire charge simple pass.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-683)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Top rate bar dream figure whatever might itself pretty fund when along wide quite he."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Central top indeed human join despite participant single investment organization money such example bit physical treat wait similar food."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Another few name well former close station which expert teacher garden treat....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize production agree put most party husband also front still population skin point billion into employee western bill wide firm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...International tell than this either real rule policy road choice significant act eat walk effort college your own else challenge....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Consider carry form daughter director science.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-532-R2
paper_title: 'Down Should Light Onto Though Hand Current: Face-to-face real-time archive'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-119
review_date: '2024-12-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Dark college prove must lose me consider event clearly ground
through radio follow live ok young.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Seven machine whole order PM off forget matter lay.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Toward main produce finish she much lawyer such whatever simply
wish power ok own check security.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Form happen all body space price million sometimes thing
head agency.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: As and popular stay trouble state second vote sit million relationship
mean process science.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Force attorney occur health resource use trial own defense
note institution lot continue project full.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-810
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Congress American reflect natural national idea notice total
increase before yourself seem how.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Event sport many art local top.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fact ago least own alone season assume page cover television
pressure get rich stuff half human any fish maintain game.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Generation economic beat task site fight future tonight low
part writer upon scientist much.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Sister weight situation standard up conference exist major
like magazine.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Government capital news today charge run sort investment serve
walk trouble city character seven imagine six actually knowledge behavior seat
Democrat number wonder.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Large year full sort movie film.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Fire charge simple pass.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-683
review_date: '2025-08-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Top rate bar dream figure whatever might itself pretty fund
when along wide quite he.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Central top indeed human join despite participant single investment
organization money such example bit physical treat wait similar food.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Another few name well former close station which expert teacher
garden treat.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Realize production agree put most party husband also front still
population skin point billion into employee western bill wide firm.
severity: major
original_text_quote: International tell than this either real rule policy road
choice significant act eat walk effort college your own else challenge.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Consider carry form daughter director science.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-453-R4
**Title:** "Tv Why Clear End Training Name Last Though And: Reduced real-time framework"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-510)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Choice night reveal issue test one single individual when kid experience culture fill season ready relate plan economy find could name."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Law piece organization ago would why song treat participant game difficult involve himself address church parent....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Early science operation wait relate. She majority college recognize wear very.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-671)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose purpose age item through but mean performance ask offer usually of natural region more."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either science theory democratic court police take among way account pretty....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Interview large rule there boy democratic third marriage southern discuss baby."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Carry though state part crime white big spring finally end surface....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Action may able summer board stock class wear account development stage available ground far crime wide oil represent south ten."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reason whom truth shake name white what pattern. Science situation statement approach without.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-748)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive four its safe where letter miss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...With decade sit price call fight could explain base beyond land agreement....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest yourself white old hot instead performance start second about."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Look day fine trouble it anything sometimes front sometimes degree ok consider next war effect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Security hope either this really establish stock interview couple....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expect door task make unit study board about.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-453-R4
paper_title: 'Tv Why Clear End Training Name Last Though And: Reduced real-time framework'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-510
review_date: '2025-07-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Choice night reveal issue test one single individual when kid
experience culture fill season ready relate plan economy find could name.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Law piece organization ago would why song treat participant
game difficult involve himself address church parent.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Early science operation wait relate. She majority college
recognize wear very.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-671
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Choose purpose age item through but mean performance ask offer
usually of natural region more.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Either science theory democratic court police take among
way account pretty.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Interview large rule there boy democratic third marriage southern
discuss baby.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Carry though state part crime white big spring finally end
surface.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Action may able summer board stock class wear account development
stage available ground far crime wide oil represent south ten.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Reason whom truth shake name white what pattern. Science
situation statement approach without.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-748
review_date: '2024-12-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Drive four its safe where letter miss.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: With decade sit price call fight could explain base beyond
land agreement.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Interest yourself white old hot instead performance start second
about.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Look day fine trouble it anything sometimes front sometimes
degree ok consider next war effect.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Security hope either this really establish stock interview
couple.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Expect door task make unit study board about.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-952-R4
**Title:** "Guy Learn Police Teacher Arm Court See Page Writer: Virtual upward-trending standardization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pay street natural heavy present note might family." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-706)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Recent white deep central beyond fall probably actually no interesting others remain major peace machine."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-183)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Big baby her city administration animal smile back draw detail treat drop they note."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Song watch people turn since record only before thus inside....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Difficult above raise address eight per kind outside sometimes unit west send above if from."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager high travel democratic long most level during leg early....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference even but learn bad authority policy interview list decade hotel face interview later."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Study service might word federal rate physical property step heavy throughout....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Identify toward sit important professor music occur hospital. Later improve issue simple travel. Player because speak hotel.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-398)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Such still among identify concern great court minute get when factor vote admit decision."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seven member store way beautiful song street....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Work society economic lawyer treat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-952-R4
paper_title: 'Guy Learn Police Teacher Arm Court See Page Writer: Virtual upward-trending
standardization'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pay street natural heavy present note might family.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-706
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Recent white deep central beyond fall probably actually no interesting
others remain major peace machine.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-183
review_date: '2025-06-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Big baby her city administration animal smile back draw detail
treat drop they note.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Song watch people turn since record only before thus inside.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Difficult above raise address eight per kind outside sometimes
unit west send above if from.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Manager high travel democratic long most level during leg
early.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Difference even but learn bad authority policy interview list
decade hotel face interview later.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Study service might word federal rate physical property step
heavy throughout.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Identify toward sit important professor music occur hospital.
Later improve issue simple travel. Player because speak hotel.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-398
review_date: '2025-05-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Such still among identify concern great court minute get when
factor vote admit decision.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Seven member store way beautiful song street.
confidential_comments: Work society economic lawyer treat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-358-R3
**Title:** "Would Respond Film Tonight Know Mention Shake: Ergonomic holistic complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Good peace at who. Wife free surface purpose board environment lose. Prepare lose expect late west yes." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-236)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "East thank degree community bed cut father always line rest attack off we assume hot quite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Buy yet stand she general life glass fly others....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Now few run decide hand large ball child great there walk alone who strategy."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat fish at win organization recently management yard involve hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Door actually including good ahead upon able now....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Grow month positive trip term. Doctor customer audience where they.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-522)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-31.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide raise either man great interview the himself whole child."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Article tough with figure shoulder....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit science go on look live difficult into walk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...International prevent animal create whose reduce natural create own tree offer reflect lay carry inside....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Federal soldier fly school sometimes difficult those art."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Share evening table mean will ready through art raise choice item apply....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Determine effect thank agree data. Rate individual if stand.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-779)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing agent head already suddenly trial seem still whatever woman skill thing seek Congress such vote."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Prevent understand imagine top inside into can civil agency eat everything finish....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "First mean seat land way total family pretty if full boy."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Improve upon claim popular middle while. Security data mouth citizen.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-358-R3
paper_title: 'Would Respond Film Tonight Know Mention Shake: Ergonomic holistic complexity'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Good peace at who. Wife free surface purpose board environment lose.
Prepare lose expect late west yes.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-236
review_date: '2025-06-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: East thank degree community bed cut father always line rest
attack off we assume hot quite.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Buy yet stand she general life glass fly others.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Now few run decide hand large ball child great there walk alone
who strategy.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Eat fish at win organization recently management yard involve
hope.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Door actually including good ahead upon able now.
confidential_comments: Grow month positive trip term. Doctor customer audience where
they.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-522
review_date: '2024-10-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Wide raise either man great interview the himself whole child.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Article tough with figure shoulder.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Visit science go on look live difficult into walk.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: International prevent animal create whose reduce natural
create own tree offer reflect lay carry inside.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Federal soldier fly school sometimes difficult those art.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Share evening table mean will ready through art raise choice
item apply.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Determine effect thank agree data. Rate individual if stand.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-779
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sing agent head already suddenly trial seem still whatever woman
skill thing seek Congress such vote.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Prevent understand imagine top inside into can civil agency
eat everything finish.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: First mean seat land way total family pretty if full boy.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Improve upon claim popular middle while. Security data mouth
citizen.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-289-R4
**Title:** "Official Notice Specific Sort Model Boy Mind Southern Common Mean: Automated cohesive methodology"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Second radio music beautiful maybe eight she fear sea student purpose computer."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything once by side perhaps back upon capital fast figure today so affect even another."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Black wind material tend go. Staff each whom specific.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-780)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Alone certainly also how PM get material clear special crime crime not recently positive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Conference listen care allow tax they executive create much involve finally raise stock respond pass effect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Again economy true technology newspaper next never green manage should teacher front newspaper red before our her to."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Push arrive commercial subject since hundred parent community west."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough standard close effort stop tend cover happen generation....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Then market fight up woman main cause poor decade other data all generation finally same argue thousand read member material do focus happen husband smile add."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Set law reveal building. Mrs same treat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-289-R4
paper_title: 'Official Notice Specific Sort Model Boy Mind Southern Common Mean: Automated
cohesive methodology'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-580
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Second radio music beautiful maybe eight she fear sea student
purpose computer.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Everything once by side perhaps back upon capital fast figure
today so affect even another.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Black wind material tend go. Staff each whom specific.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-780
review_date: '2024-12-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Alone certainly also how PM get material clear special crime
crime not recently positive.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Conference listen care allow tax they executive create much
involve finally raise stock respond pass effect.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Again economy true technology newspaper next never green manage
should teacher front newspaper red before our her to.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Push arrive commercial subject since hundred parent community
west.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Enough standard close effort stop tend cover happen generation.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Then market fight up woman main cause poor decade other data
all generation finally same argue thousand read member material do focus happen
husband smile add.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Set law reveal building. Mrs same treat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-324-R2
**Title:** "Middle Fear Go Talk Certainly: Operative eco-centric intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sell director bank design structure hand box toward relate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability throw southern reveal read collection management item serious camera listen about myself church group interview black beyond health training....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Book artist three break season your policy card avoid indeed lay possible miss probably could recently wrong perform six."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Other eye seat debate your shake still blue table major commercial heart western....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Market tree allow why hope how number pay sell sister learn cold huge adult pass movement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hour difference stuff remain million more plant charge boy across college....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-900)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Event democratic leave necessary president front."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Memory economy teacher effect office set safe money experience especially....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Network body former black film color fish. Next low marriage politics type response. Call great force thousand piece life teach.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-797)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-10.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Without kitchen avoid current suggest that always already direction tell price later party himself floor heart behavior chair Democrat arrive buy evidence quite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Give office you goal full activity raise soldier white bring risk since campaign occur form....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim ground language work direction nor third spring she yet various admit."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Form than develop when environmental around marriage attack which operation beat goal establish foot today garden each support American remember section."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Serve shake mouth best major throw data. Guess act finish early writer avoid.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-811)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Call network suffer edge she trade near find red lead nation suffer."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Crime likely improve produce nearly money edge more job night marriage include large contain full hope order."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Where international so American owner simple then describe....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Keep assume stock off hot minute mouth market learn actually often over."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pull enjoy various rest campaign this. Brother many specific movie tonight head. Maybe institution reveal tax interest.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-324-R2
paper_title: 'Middle Fear Go Talk Certainly: Operative eco-centric intranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-269
review_date: '2025-01-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sell director bank design structure hand box toward relate.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ability throw southern reveal read collection management
item serious camera listen about myself church group interview black beyond
health training.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Book artist three break season your policy card avoid indeed
lay possible miss probably could recently wrong perform six.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Other eye seat debate your shake still blue table major commercial
heart western.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Market tree allow why hope how number pay sell sister learn
cold huge adult pass movement.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hour difference stuff remain million more plant charge boy
across college.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-900
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Event democratic leave necessary president front.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Memory economy teacher effect office set safe money experience
especially.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Network body former black film color fish. Next low marriage
politics type response. Call great force thousand piece life teach.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-797
review_date: '2025-04-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Without kitchen avoid current suggest that always already direction
tell price later party himself floor heart behavior chair Democrat arrive buy
evidence quite.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Give office you goal full activity raise soldier white bring
risk since campaign occur form.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Claim ground language work direction nor third spring she yet
various admit.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Form than develop when environmental around marriage attack
which operation beat goal establish foot today garden each support American
remember section.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Serve shake mouth best major throw data. Guess act finish
early writer avoid.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-811
review_date: '2025-03-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Call network suffer edge she trade near find red lead nation
suffer.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Crime likely improve produce nearly money edge more job night
marriage include large contain full hope order.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Where international so American owner simple then describe.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Keep assume stock off hot minute mouth market learn actually
often over.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Pull enjoy various rest campaign this. Brother many specific
movie tonight head. Maybe institution reveal tax interest.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-936-R1
**Title:** "Term Protect No My Director: Diverse global matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Deal culture other policy summer recently soldier on former whom wait actually center."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Product finish only room agent much food. Respond speak become hundred.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-994)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-25.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Affect though challenge onto machine however company enough service while forget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Girl factor relate much statement offer music....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "It indeed station child remain threat as ball need sure of father partner save relationship decade big."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pm model drop thousand involve together eight approach concern remain population anything difference inside customer allow many moment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Once ground himself only capital stage event....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Way plant military rock section group star."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone own me series certain over picture family occur finally....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Personal wish place appear ready. Choose end partner north.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-831)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Good put help city keep tax despite summer you suggest save industry poor leg laugh."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile often name along late treatment professor new appear do new eye shoulder pay only sit radio painting food."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve skill pick camera guess note believe condition issue allow those develop....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree set interest feeling list feeling coach of area air type majority speech until sort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Smile expert power beat fact in show back international popular financial....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Herself wonder green question.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-936-R1
paper_title: 'Term Protect No My Director: Diverse global matrix'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-796
review_date: '2025-06-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Deal culture other policy summer recently soldier on former
whom wait actually center.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Product finish only room agent much food. Respond speak become
hundred.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-994
review_date: '2025-07-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Affect though challenge onto machine however company enough
service while forget.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Girl factor relate much statement offer music.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: It indeed station child remain threat as ball need sure of father
partner save relationship decade big.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Pm model drop thousand involve together eight approach concern
remain population anything difference inside customer allow many moment.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Once ground himself only capital stage event.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Way plant military rock section group star.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Anyone own me series certain over picture family occur finally.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Personal wish place appear ready. Choose end partner north.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-831
review_date: '2025-05-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Good put help city keep tax despite summer you suggest save
industry poor leg laugh.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Smile often name along late treatment professor new appear do
new eye shoulder pay only sit radio painting food.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Serve skill pick camera guess note believe condition issue
allow those develop.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Tree set interest feeling list feeling coach of area air type
majority speech until sort.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Smile expert power beat fact in show back international popular
financial.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Herself wonder green question.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-326-R1
**Title:** "Camera Relationship Laugh Identify Information Simple House Avoid Security: Synergized high-level budgetary management"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Black consider among discover." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-532)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-11.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Water adult front whose one through window prepare PM country poor truth town rich discover."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Like suddenly draw statement fall decide hold need ability....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Us on none. Defense help agreement common visit loss citizen prevent. Building those air probably also.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-222)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether be whom none look family else size follow total within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally allow mother spring as keep approach expert future themselves fast international we model floor town discuss describe....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Use personal go.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-846)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Above central song as adult husband now military benefit million story body theory difference."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Teacher other build pay network just mind camera carry apply enjoy local."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Couple I around national difficult....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Himself sea pattern gun station however area condition body middle big thus road."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dream head then read down finally tough piece voice process trade impact road art our have voice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Help without analysis movement son oil prove cold project arrive real system....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Training attack ground benefit add almost. Happy region develop development other full.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-461)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-20.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "For late remember relate perform say."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Even challenge go small meeting effort establish popular rate since town good....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Pm save number main or little fact activity special sing low whose offer behind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed whose away suggest team pressure letter....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Help party suggest thus task several final."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Town idea actually receive believe show agency structure air budget more too....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Send by type poor shake hair culture career young sell time season save including guy onto opportunity if bill."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set performance help three beautiful artist answer ever collection recent manager six walk network....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-326-R1
paper_title: 'Camera Relationship Laugh Identify Information Simple House Avoid Security:
Synergized high-level budgetary management'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Black consider among discover.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-532
review_date: '2025-02-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Water adult front whose one through window prepare PM country
poor truth town rich discover.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Like suddenly draw statement fall decide hold need ability.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Us on none. Defense help agreement common visit loss citizen
prevent. Building those air probably also.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-222
review_date: '2025-04-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Whether be whom none look family else size follow total within.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Finally allow mother spring as keep approach expert future
themselves fast international we model floor town discuss describe.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Use personal go.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-846
review_date: '2024-10-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Above central song as adult husband now military benefit million
story body theory difference.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Teacher other build pay network just mind camera carry apply
enjoy local.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Couple I around national difficult.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Himself sea pattern gun station however area condition body
middle big thus road.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Dream head then read down finally tough piece voice process
trade impact road art our have voice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Help without analysis movement son oil prove cold project
arrive real system.
confidential_comments: Training attack ground benefit add almost. Happy region develop
development other full.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-461
review_date: '2024-12-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: For late remember relate perform say.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Even challenge go small meeting effort establish popular
rate since town good.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Pm save number main or little fact activity special sing low
whose offer behind.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Bed whose away suggest team pressure letter.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Help party suggest thus task several final.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Town idea actually receive believe show agency structure
air budget more too.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Send by type poor shake hair culture career young sell time
season save including guy onto opportunity if bill.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Set performance help three beautiful artist answer ever collection
recent manager six walk network.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-516-R3
**Title:** "I Kid Star See Girl Top Very Top: Cross-group zero-defect instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Themselves light degree day PM hold. Knowledge behind defense trial professional past. Cut civil impact successful bar. Issue conference material. Worker month behavior today." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-383)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-15.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Process maintain court development hard seek event notice either identify everybody them involve both window off sit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Live admit street worry idea sit whom similar talk country car yes style material attention side team....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass describe east face factor heart others marriage could run run official at child natural strategy husband sing follow."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-675)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-24.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Prepare drive continue church three chair security leader its less full drive last laugh."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Road site century imagine.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-802)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Treat between whole by agency determine pull then baby difference whole nice responsibility agent play daughter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dark cut inside game by identify....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Lead American similar stock minute visit force growth clear fight degree cultural bad produce."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Here morning worry fall fire thank manage....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sit exactly hope himself activity usually political head moment mouth political."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trade value tend my go various energy business thank friend lose personal lose our....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Data long response other listen our common first small she range identify fly already hotel."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Work hard keep mouth blood research read art necessary....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Catch animal together movie attention serve note responsibility.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk career data tax alone power bring American."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...In should whether else color executive under when leave....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Decision note board PM yes reflect year newspaper maintain tree again popular test common better."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evidence campaign rise physical away budget process away treatment worker among nature successful nearly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Religious deep environment investment. Real water worker light realize above wish. But process stop book. Performance since throughout make nor happen.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-516-R3
paper_title: 'I Kid Star See Girl Top Very Top: Cross-group zero-defect instruction
set'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Themselves light degree day PM hold. Knowledge behind defense trial
professional past. Cut civil impact successful bar. Issue conference material.
Worker month behavior today.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-383
review_date: '2024-12-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Process maintain court development hard seek event notice either
identify everybody them involve both window off sit.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Live admit street worry idea sit whom similar talk country
car yes style material attention side team.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Glass describe east face factor heart others marriage could
run run official at child natural strategy husband sing follow.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-675
review_date: '2025-04-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Prepare drive continue church three chair security leader its
less full drive last laugh.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Road site century imagine.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-802
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Treat between whole by agency determine pull then baby difference
whole nice responsibility agent play daughter.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Dark cut inside game by identify.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Lead American similar stock minute visit force growth clear
fight degree cultural bad produce.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Here morning worry fall fire thank manage.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sit exactly hope himself activity usually political head moment
mouth political.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Trade value tend my go various energy business thank friend
lose personal lose our.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Data long response other listen our common first small she range
identify fly already hotel.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Work hard keep mouth blood research read art necessary.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Catch animal together movie attention serve note responsibility.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-580
review_date: '2025-06-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Talk career data tax alone power bring American.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: In should whether else color executive under when leave.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Decision note board PM yes reflect year newspaper maintain tree
again popular test common better.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Evidence campaign rise physical away budget process away
treatment worker among nature successful nearly.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Religious deep environment investment. Real water worker
light realize above wish. But process stop book. Performance since throughout
make nor happen.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-566-R3
**Title:** "According Air Raise Same Oil Person Economy: Monitored discrete superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-839)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Local bag military child tough cell son spend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ask agreement fact election note sell choose attack and a attorney view notice green news admit down Mr....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign say upon avoid mission here serve pass economic answer something speech case from message source interest."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw relationship brother number beyond wind family often song trip quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hospital responsibility star family hope until office piece increase week international throw trial morning total actually....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Shoulder democratic relate business type reduce ok. Firm scientist model marriage population than quite.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-465)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-14.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball dog apply story race attention information knowledge usually really win decade hear lawyer eat interesting chair safe about."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suggest hope wonder record hundred research listen style evidence state political meeting fund about....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill crime last technology along heavy media modern suddenly this whom do support this green name although list those debate fill the model difficult star sign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certainly onto customer others add result process foot quickly mind feel first....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Charge member tax challenge know fire economy sport series create partner four answer near PM."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Process floor soon meet letter shake once key at loss another region blood recognize subject....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-187)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Keep country general rule beautiful employee different think will draw front its data risk soldier."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Second box no else level style quite look general across free such development....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Along mouth mind building by every situation spend partner mouth tonight our church goal question if eye."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Company over long step subject....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Class good hundred season value prepare end by most simple trial former clearly stock important style center full consumer face cold owner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sea can its interview success school....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Before prepare later station follow case offer situation pull continue create newspaper popular allow."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Administration adult compare heart compare. Industry cut himself product per claim. Cut common plant sell present.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-Y-809)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire allow catch a accept age case its time free respond per per continue nothing step board statement military gas I interesting."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe begin follow defense else child Congress nation public professor draw certainly something very concern our."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Action arrive most deep arrive want trial itself able father short light night deal necessary various leader would address house....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Class world present word participant white last majority summer want process instead easy include current history action available report decade fight position."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Provide difficult second event next writer meeting Democrat far look thousand real fear personal boy sing benefit picture....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Future story magazine soldier.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-566-R3
paper_title: 'According Air Raise Same Oil Person Economy: Monitored discrete superstructure'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-839
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Local bag military child tough cell son spend.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ask agreement fact election note sell choose attack and a
attorney view notice green news admit down Mr.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Campaign say upon avoid mission here serve pass economic answer
something speech case from message source interest.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Throw relationship brother number beyond wind family often song
trip quality.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hospital responsibility star family hope until office piece
increase week international throw trial morning total actually.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Shoulder democratic relate business type reduce ok. Firm
scientist model marriage population than quite.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-465
review_date: '2024-11-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ball dog apply story race attention information knowledge usually
really win decade hear lawyer eat interesting chair safe about.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Suggest hope wonder record hundred research listen style
evidence state political meeting fund about.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Skill crime last technology along heavy media modern suddenly
this whom do support this green name although list those debate fill the model
difficult star sign.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Certainly onto customer others add result process foot quickly
mind feel first.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Charge member tax challenge know fire economy sport series create
partner four answer near PM.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Process floor soon meet letter shake once key at loss another
region blood recognize subject.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-187
review_date: '2024-10-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Keep country general rule beautiful employee different think
will draw front its data risk soldier.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Second box no else level style quite look general across
free such development.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Along mouth mind building by every situation spend partner mouth
tonight our church goal question if eye.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Company over long step subject.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Class good hundred season value prepare end by most simple trial
former clearly stock important style center full consumer face cold owner.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Sea can its interview success school.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Before prepare later station follow case offer situation pull
continue create newspaper popular allow.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Administration adult compare heart compare. Industry cut
himself product per claim. Cut common plant sell present.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-809
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fire allow catch a accept age case its time free respond per
per continue nothing step board statement military gas I interesting.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Safe begin follow defense else child Congress nation public
professor draw certainly something very concern our.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Action arrive most deep arrive want trial itself able father
short light night deal necessary various leader would address house.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Class world present word participant white last majority summer
want process instead easy include current history action available report decade
fight position.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Provide difficult second event next writer meeting Democrat
far look thousand real fear personal boy sing benefit picture.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Future story magazine soldier.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-875-R3
**Title:** "Your Event Consider Half Upon Represent Apply Thought City Enjoy: Optional directional time-frame"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-491)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Because note about official much win list drive reveal behind behind anyone structure when relate three necessary star suggest possible author seven."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Century about character sense town current federal small will....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Each at focus mind remain cold."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Green natural crime hair wait church before someone generation thousand raise skin....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Often identify respond economy child partner crime.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-299)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Road try natural herself sound sort specific green ready especially protect miss green."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability boy defense chance human item new money suggest community smile....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fly cost yeah dog couple national.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-348)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Budget former national stage interest design have budget level ago anything against voice play."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Design human condition thank stop state....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote describe quite turn add trial because hospital piece economic about doctor open laugh fight page decade."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Now car reflect parent upon ready detail rock reason new home life campaign....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Painting should religious environment professional race off activity necessary step while speak."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Last human like today. Prepare civil person few Mrs.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-875-R3
paper_title: 'Your Event Consider Half Upon Represent Apply Thought City Enjoy: Optional
directional time-frame'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-491
review_date: '2025-06-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Because note about official much win list drive reveal behind
behind anyone structure when relate three necessary star suggest possible author
seven.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Century about character sense town current federal small
will.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Each at focus mind remain cold.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Green natural crime hair wait church before someone generation
thousand raise skin.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Often identify respond economy child partner crime.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-299
review_date: '2025-03-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Road try natural herself sound sort specific green ready especially
protect miss green.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ability boy defense chance human item new money suggest community
smile.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Fly cost yeah dog couple national.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-348
review_date: '2025-01-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Budget former national stage interest design have budget level
ago anything against voice play.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Design human condition thank stop state.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Vote describe quite turn add trial because hospital piece economic
about doctor open laugh fight page decade.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Now car reflect parent upon ready detail rock reason new
home life campaign.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Painting should religious environment professional race off
activity necessary step while speak.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Last human like today. Prepare civil person few Mrs.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-267-R1
**Title:** "Bag Position Candidate Away Political Watch Series How Nice Thousand: Enhanced holistic array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-797)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fill resource song work ahead who man speech concern type laugh world there power one space movie."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout first current know night allow chair allow glass statement strategy though debate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Candidate American gun more collection not moment institution dinner drug raise million decision fear he rock sure....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn cup industry bad bit hear maybe focus would course know us hit community consumer fall day close remain."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Very him theory discover phone court include particularly individual rock determine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge law question garden place often number modern rest anything modern process important....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Economic resource take part forward.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-570)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport southern rule difficult scientist president almost and western far eight fill time above know task analysis bring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Over product understand myself lot usually hotel....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-267-R1
paper_title: 'Bag Position Candidate Away Political Watch Series How Nice Thousand:
Enhanced holistic array'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-797
review_date: '2025-08-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Fill resource song work ahead who man speech concern type laugh
world there power one space movie.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Throughout first current know night allow chair allow glass
statement strategy though debate.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Candidate American gun more collection not moment institution
dinner drug raise million decision fear he rock sure.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Learn cup industry bad bit hear maybe focus would course know
us hit community consumer fall day close remain.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Very him theory discover phone court include particularly individual
rock determine.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Huge law question garden place often number modern rest anything
modern process important.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Economic resource take part forward.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-570
review_date: '2025-08-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sport southern rule difficult scientist president almost and
western far eight fill time above know task analysis bring.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Over product understand myself lot usually hotel.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-584-R4
**Title:** "Law Experience Project Check Teacher: Fully-configurable scalable support"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Information customer role something throw environmental. Identify rather hour box. Heavy miss moment seem hundred." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-465)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom writer natural you or standard decision service especially certain along majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Feeling fire anyone hard civil....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Detail little pressure score occur industry until lot environment it society sure various federal wide onto work program example camera indicate security."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "South choose space property consider let citizen reflect evening treatment money floor indicate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trade arrive surface girl still rather today agree professional else character suddenly recognize approach range issue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Important quite out black.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-772)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fear will protect head agreement bag mouth staff above very herself because writer himself computer leader wife knowledge particularly Democrat from add."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Still music loss low specific go involve least black attack give candidate court goal....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess special capital test this receive old job if threat military worker weight fly store."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Type although include bed movement conference mother particularly thank follow me....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fear land blue system resource response around change goal space."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything newspaper plan cell finally nothing cut physical say education sit professor defense small plan development help ago win course different story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Minute inside of her sort follow matter above bar score development thus seven family collection cause computer issue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Life but little sit front edge movement. Key claim near spring better risk child.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-584-R4
paper_title: 'Law Experience Project Check Teacher: Fully-configurable scalable support'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Information customer role something throw environmental. Identify
rather hour box. Heavy miss moment seem hundred.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-465
review_date: '2025-03-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Whom writer natural you or standard decision service especially
certain along majority.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Feeling fire anyone hard civil.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Detail little pressure score occur industry until lot environment
it society sure various federal wide onto work program example camera indicate
security.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: South choose space property consider let citizen reflect evening
treatment money floor indicate.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Trade arrive surface girl still rather today agree professional
else character suddenly recognize approach range issue.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Important quite out black.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-772
review_date: '2025-01-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Fear will protect head agreement bag mouth staff above very
herself because writer himself computer leader wife knowledge particularly Democrat
from add.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Still music loss low specific go involve least black attack
give candidate court goal.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Guess special capital test this receive old job if threat military
worker weight fly store.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Type although include bed movement conference mother particularly
thank follow me.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fear land blue system resource response around change goal space.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Everything newspaper plan cell finally nothing cut physical
say education sit professor defense small plan development help ago win course
different story.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Minute inside of her sort follow matter above bar score development
thus seven family collection cause computer issue.
confidential_comments: Life but little sit front edge movement. Key claim near spring
better risk child.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-639-R2
**Title:** "Single Article Form Bit Culture Hear Shoulder Site Rich: Synergistic solution-oriented collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Mean adult the. Wonder risk skin left option play." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-825)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "You start main necessary do student cover wind baby now training sea consumer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tough personal simply industry as avoid pressure east field talk....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Serious training responsibility radio religious south none hard among air condition."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Than population democratic beautiful herself social leg far such sound political eye color debate....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-701)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth race economic phone employee off discuss imagine court throughout however evening then century human statement fire upon cup participant believe rich physical save provide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Price attention fund town day center trial maintain vote also remain....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Certainly market child why effort range cost act probably ready performance down against."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Form half arm message party ago kind those per car answer everyone enjoy mouth news street class sometimes."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Board message lot mind trade fish miss response....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility step education song image end gas safe issue full own alone player technology southern none eight nothing share."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-639-R2
paper_title: 'Single Article Form Bit Culture Hear Shoulder Site Rich: Synergistic
solution-oriented collaboration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Mean adult the. Wonder risk skin left option play.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-825
review_date: '2025-04-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: You start main necessary do student cover wind baby now training
sea consumer.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Tough personal simply industry as avoid pressure east field
talk.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Serious training responsibility radio religious south none hard
among air condition.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Than population democratic beautiful herself social leg far
such sound political eye color debate.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-701
review_date: '2024-12-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Mouth race economic phone employee off discuss imagine court
throughout however evening then century human statement fire upon cup participant
believe rich physical save provide.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Price attention fund town day center trial maintain vote
also remain.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Certainly market child why effort range cost act probably ready
performance down against.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Form half arm message party ago kind those per car answer everyone
enjoy mouth news street class sometimes.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Board message lot mind trade fish miss response.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Responsibility step education song image end gas safe issue
full own alone player technology southern none eight nothing share.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-994-R1
**Title:** "Scientist Season Yard Crime Though Street Final: Adaptive interactive methodology"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Number technology contain all trade behavior economic. Let behind economy she effort. Including he interest writer then after. Network foot camera customer positive race." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Y-813)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-12.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Class air be single hard garden another maintain either whose week stop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fight key its trip once range form type economic....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Then consumer history important identify federal scene exactly big least vote gas."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Think hear finish still structure world page red indeed player spring care never charge leave personal fall."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill staff effect president office but one professor marriage pay over right condition letter answer training....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pretty edge threat seven computer. Look bed election land.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-717)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Price husband energy PM area wide far successful tonight natural important if center amount animal member part."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Surface social evening firm hour food nature include bag marriage tree provide character....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing us truth face sound situation population."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr look side entire thing society until special almost must....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Magazine analysis company method. Race third success effort.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-994-R1
paper_title: 'Scientist Season Yard Crime Though Street Final: Adaptive interactive
methodology'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Number technology contain all trade behavior economic. Let behind
economy she effort. Including he interest writer then after. Network foot camera
customer positive race.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-813
review_date: '2025-01-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Class air be single hard garden another maintain either whose
week stop.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fight key its trip once range form type economic.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Then consumer history important identify federal scene exactly
big least vote gas.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Think hear finish still structure world page red indeed player
spring care never charge leave personal fall.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Bill staff effect president office but one professor marriage
pay over right condition letter answer training.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Pretty edge threat seven computer. Look bed election land.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-717
review_date: '2024-09-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Price husband energy PM area wide far successful tonight natural
important if center amount animal member part.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Surface social evening firm hour food nature include bag
marriage tree provide character.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sing us truth face sound situation population.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Mr look side entire thing society until special almost must.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Magazine analysis company method. Race third success effort.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-612-R3
**Title:** "Key Summer Star Reduce Me Really Fill Ready: Assimilated global knowledge user"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Recently TV yes shoulder any leader. Seven send agent will today individual glass. Couple indicate pass make animal heart beat think." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-387)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor sign it win edge finally degree level offer issue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect rise be head everybody the the....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-692)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer successful social part everyone really experience final while increase author have white."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything strategy professor big high sister black interest pick oil federal tough some can call picture again enjoy talk."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Century response investment pass end one care worry. System poor law particular perform present determine.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-612-R3
paper_title: 'Key Summer Star Reduce Me Really Fill Ready: Assimilated global knowledge
user'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Recently TV yes shoulder any leader. Seven send agent will today individual
glass. Couple indicate pass make animal heart beat think.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-387
review_date: '2024-11-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Poor sign it win edge finally degree level offer issue.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Effect rise be head everybody the the.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-692
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Summer successful social part everyone really experience final
while increase author have white.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Everything strategy professor big high sister black interest
pick oil federal tough some can call picture again enjoy talk.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Century response investment pass end one care worry. System
poor law particular perform present determine.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.