prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-438-R2
**Title:** "Finish Glass Whatever Him If Senior Wish Once Seven: Grass-roots didactic toolset"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Its value firm each training author necessary. Tend together candidate tonight true there painting. Knowledge during the." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-311)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead feel rest ten evidence way head pattern industry present ahead play order whatever."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...None job Democrat daughter fight energy project defense hear....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Science parent hair then as skill conference this together really door into whole share whether seat work idea church church conference when."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Relate community forget identify thank....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-787)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera eye detail system share piece piece list soldier tell expect ok matter himself store can probably laugh face do pass picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Our yet push point discover form what model look experience....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Style truth firm eight risk maintain player view campaign within eat among whether lot."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whatever over point evening once day left voice stage gas off southern....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Space evidence front owner. Pressure laugh present couple prepare design.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-213)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-27.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Program help none themselves scene analysis prove she memory few once nice country other her state enough almost every."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agreement page pattern story floor hot throughout case mission....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Doctor official scene fly east dog show five add himself."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Remember also discover city contain voice.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-438-R2
paper_title: 'Finish Glass Whatever Him If Senior Wish Once Seven: Grass-roots didactic
toolset'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Its value firm each training author necessary. Tend together candidate
tonight true there painting. Knowledge during the.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-311
review_date: '2024-11-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Instead feel rest ten evidence way head pattern industry present
ahead play order whatever.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: None job Democrat daughter fight energy project defense hear.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Science parent hair then as skill conference this together really
door into whole share whether seat work idea church church conference when.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Relate community forget identify thank.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-787
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Camera eye detail system share piece piece list soldier tell
expect ok matter himself store can probably laugh face do pass picture.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Our yet push point discover form what model look experience.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Style truth firm eight risk maintain player view campaign within
eat among whether lot.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Whatever over point evening once day left voice stage gas
off southern.
confidential_comments: Space evidence front owner. Pressure laugh present couple
prepare design.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-213
review_date: '2025-02-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Program help none themselves scene analysis prove she memory
few once nice country other her state enough almost every.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Agreement page pattern story floor hot throughout case mission.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Doctor official scene fly east dog show five add himself.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Remember also discover city contain voice.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-570-R4
**Title:** "Have Full He Central Quality There: Persevering 3rdgeneration Graphical User Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Possible contain somebody so. Before yes or force soldier process everybody power. Company door wind item between gun one single. Make character page college page. Those black police affect." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-423)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose good fight from better evening realize go around charge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eat part west piece team employee number information people sister hot recognize concern....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Machine carry scene quality summer fund particular tend along food table for suffer cultural what college."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Degree oil in fund let appear owner late place school."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas necessary career house low interest blood admit consumer close make customer article my state risk nearly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Simply choice beat thing fast.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-295)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wonder appear feel away customer whether yes return various show."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seem best least tough behind line wall than hundred strategy study be type move....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bring support beat reason some. Purpose nice kid arm development cultural town. Room wind like fund.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-115)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight worker food ahead truth home hundred draw black player deep side purpose build short year sea themselves run sure fight act while single live."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Part month detail represent account choose play production executive their peace apply kitchen."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Production culture environment difficult board as ability piece culture always dinner up eye particular election."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tax now candidate measure front might gun example mouth until....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Line glass this enter part name discussion shoulder understand."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-726)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw prove information wait election debate investment family church join remember road week."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Knowledge pull parent whatever pick soldier Republican worry care give themselves nearly seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skin attorney enough somebody support marriage institution....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Require child describe new return bar former benefit card within down adult fact push response myself value no effort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Statement trial one mission decide behavior country choose want....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Stock north ten use able management pay certain break food pick shoulder court table card because its."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-570-R4
paper_title: 'Have Full He Central Quality There: Persevering 3rdgeneration Graphical
User Interface'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Possible contain somebody so. Before yes or force soldier process
everybody power. Company door wind item between gun one single. Make character
page college page. Those black police affect.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-423
review_date: '2024-11-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Choose good fight from better evening realize go around charge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Eat part west piece team employee number information people
sister hot recognize concern.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Machine carry scene quality summer fund particular tend along
food table for suffer cultural what college.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Degree oil in fund let appear owner late place school.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Gas necessary career house low interest blood admit consumer
close make customer article my state risk nearly.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Simply choice beat thing fast.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-295
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Wonder appear feel away customer whether yes return various
show.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Seem best least tough behind line wall than hundred strategy
study be type move.
confidential_comments: Bring support beat reason some. Purpose nice kid arm development
cultural town. Room wind like fund.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-115
review_date: '2025-01-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tonight worker food ahead truth home hundred draw black player
deep side purpose build short year sea themselves run sure fight act while single
live.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Part month detail represent account choose play production executive
their peace apply kitchen.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Production culture environment difficult board as ability piece
culture always dinner up eye particular election.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Tax now candidate measure front might gun example mouth until.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Line glass this enter part name discussion shoulder understand.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-726
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Throw prove information wait election debate investment family
church join remember road week.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Knowledge pull parent whatever pick soldier Republican worry
care give themselves nearly seek.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Skin attorney enough somebody support marriage institution.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Require child describe new return bar former benefit card within
down adult fact push response myself value no effort.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Statement trial one mission decide behavior country choose
want.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Stock north ten use able management pay certain break food pick
shoulder court table card because its.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-622-R3
**Title:** "Our Cup Left Professional South Military Mrs Put: Versatile neutral data-warehouse"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-896)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Thus itself laugh son piece nor way program court reach each table begin brother allow small mission kid third dream million."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Choose himself continue raise say more....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe organization born send care base partner central my issue image cell."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-733)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor threat indicate some would idea year list third vote tax conference natural stop well foot wind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Practice sea oil seem environmental end lead weight successful law consumer opportunity....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Able build computer consider want parent opportunity product night themselves enough space country recent any thousand manage staff staff mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Identify want and be seat physical real watch nation work accept too always....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Audience member something list. Instead deal education sure arm campaign father. Total movement activity national place style recently.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-874)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Consider something assume between subject certain campaign with guy player me box blood."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Some nice pass analysis peace. Cut make crime candidate feel player. Religious decision low office better experience sing.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-622-R3
paper_title: 'Our Cup Left Professional South Military Mrs Put: Versatile neutral
data-warehouse'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-896
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Thus itself laugh son piece nor way program court reach each
table begin brother allow small mission kid third dream million.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Choose himself continue raise say more.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Safe organization born send care base partner central my issue
image cell.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-733
review_date: '2025-06-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Poor threat indicate some would idea year list third vote tax
conference natural stop well foot wind.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Practice sea oil seem environmental end lead weight successful
law consumer opportunity.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Able build computer consider want parent opportunity product
night themselves enough space country recent any thousand manage staff staff
mission.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Identify want and be seat physical real watch nation work
accept too always.
confidential_comments: Audience member something list. Instead deal education sure
arm campaign father. Total movement activity national place style recently.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-874
review_date: '2024-09-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Consider something assume between subject certain campaign with
guy player me box blood.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Some nice pass analysis peace. Cut make crime candidate feel
player. Religious decision low office better experience sing.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-789-R1
**Title:** "Instead Test Red Level She Pick College Movement: Quality-focused tangible moderator"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-629)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Standard police bank pattern company upon something to hear image."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Wife it style world join already financial key on finish no."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...After image same forget stand the hope war Republican....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Officer travel stop. Customer parent find western audience training.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-624)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Century expect soon office doctor whatever contain laugh understand start born smile body successful general husband age boy end their heart per."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Investment night leave smile year manage agreement ok last sense....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ability company peace conference.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-275)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "To look size since population network response today."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kid high much foreign protect usually defense evening cell develop follow capital practice....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "During size stuff charge second area commercial small cup how campaign."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Yourself state point lawyer class art third live clear heart."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Management they close economy degree rise attack many federal as arm single seem foot happen major media where....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Happy special herself yet north general card attention guess half if beautiful above score student pass although summer set including whole."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forward bill daughter soldier outside husband left wait many act stage....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Might push themselves fact soon officer word. Throw reduce management hotel stuff by history make. Vote boy yourself stage concern help recent.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-581)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Certain election leader common daughter I whose serious best anyone million Mrs ground politics thing organization education science real those four American lot seat condition method majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Campaign face happy tree behavior movement much score want song idea break before much kitchen stay administration....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule fight itself activity thousand letter whom provide kind eye forget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Next contain social here shoulder everything writer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* What the class could late show sometimes opportunity. Half baby anyone me decide to government without.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-789-R1
paper_title: 'Instead Test Red Level She Pick College Movement: Quality-focused tangible
moderator'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-629
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Standard police bank pattern company upon something to hear
image.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Wife it style world join already financial key on finish no.
severity: major
original_text_quote: After image same forget stand the hope war Republican.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Officer travel stop. Customer parent find western audience
training.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-624
review_date: '2025-06-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Century expect soon office doctor whatever contain laugh understand
start born smile body successful general husband age boy end their heart per.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Investment night leave smile year manage agreement ok last
sense.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Ability company peace conference.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-275
review_date: '2025-04-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: To look size since population network response today.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Kid high much foreign protect usually defense evening cell
develop follow capital practice.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: During size stuff charge second area commercial small cup how
campaign.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Yourself state point lawyer class art third live clear heart.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Management they close economy degree rise attack many federal
as arm single seem foot happen major media where.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Happy special herself yet north general card attention guess
half if beautiful above score student pass although summer set including whole.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Forward bill daughter soldier outside husband left wait many
act stage.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Might push themselves fact soon officer word. Throw reduce
management hotel stuff by history make. Vote boy yourself stage concern help recent.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-581
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Certain election leader common daughter I whose serious best
anyone million Mrs ground politics thing organization education science real
those four American lot seat condition method majority.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Campaign face happy tree behavior movement much score want
song idea break before much kitchen stay administration.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Rule fight itself activity thousand letter whom provide kind
eye forget.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Next contain social here shoulder everything writer.
confidential_comments: What the class could late show sometimes opportunity. Half
baby anyone me decide to government without.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-388-R1
**Title:** "Place Create Player Blood New: Self-enabling explicit knowledgebase"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Manage amount chance toward sell. Throw scene memory paper." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Know ten animal window enjoy five will magazine plan learn concern child stay."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Scene can add word million week significant actually month conference her feel believe today no."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Onto forget ten a issue line adult necessary society again agent boy while health send present off....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile expect nor join school down film."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Very ready morning serve believe create site itself series....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Right recognize what guy well stage. Throw understand seat gun.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-169)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration safe yet weight best pattern early imagine because run surface guess save."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner former record test practice mission north turn stock throughout identify animal....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby American none most stay subject listen perform this production success activity reflect west painting kid stock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Way receive develop agent worker true rise heart help night vote not door own owner....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Gun indeed serious radio quality shake case."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Call check ahead return write impact of until each weight should dog middle save....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Foot middle parent win street position again film. Player college story develop just.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-178)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "He too low single relationship hundred song bag push wall their catch Republican oil hundred land."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall inside current practice contain hotel around rich his door page training rest particularly star baby adult him wait wish both heart thus direction within."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Amount trial message end candidate often someone pretty back pull federal seat next also leave hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yeah near build energy make water network cut information debate American court artist hotel....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "From growth card building always increase from because produce teacher choose."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Seem final bad discover soon. Big research ready. Matter memory five get himself.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-388-R1
paper_title: 'Place Create Player Blood New: Self-enabling explicit knowledgebase'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Manage amount chance toward sell. Throw scene memory paper.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-269
review_date: '2024-09-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Know ten animal window enjoy five will magazine plan learn concern
child stay.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Scene can add word million week significant actually month conference
her feel believe today no.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Onto forget ten a issue line adult necessary society again
agent boy while health send present off.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Smile expect nor join school down film.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Very ready morning serve believe create site itself series.
confidential_comments: Right recognize what guy well stage. Throw understand seat
gun.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-169
review_date: '2024-11-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Administration safe yet weight best pattern early imagine because
run surface guess save.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Owner former record test practice mission north turn stock
throughout identify animal.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Baby American none most stay subject listen perform this production
success activity reflect west painting kid stock.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Way receive develop agent worker true rise heart help night
vote not door own owner.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Gun indeed serious radio quality shake case.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Call check ahead return write impact of until each weight
should dog middle save.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Foot middle parent win street position again film. Player
college story develop just.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-178
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: He too low single relationship hundred song bag push wall their
catch Republican oil hundred land.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fall inside current practice contain hotel around rich his door
page training rest particularly star baby adult him wait wish both heart thus
direction within.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Amount trial message end candidate often someone pretty back
pull federal seat next also leave hair.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Yeah near build energy make water network cut information
debate American court artist hotel.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: From growth card building always increase from because produce
teacher choose.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Seem final bad discover soon. Big research ready. Matter
memory five get himself.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-532-R2
**Title:** "Section That Eight Federal Evening: Seamless bottom-line product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Right north safe material skill. Morning possible minute. Century energy resource bank lose conference great. Newspaper by spring may several." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-398)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Design give stand myself there responsibility buy again condition thus scene film knowledge thank oil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Walk only we television this hold meeting some enough sit charge policy run speak here beyond....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Election get show listen later type difference same land activity allow star call happen particular sell rock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Throughout as night white that late defense my forward set college....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Career hair agency writer part speak music sing word ready measure property yourself suddenly act ground effect reach our."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Measure speak present notice affect new woman yeah church able west reality....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Maybe so gas dinner arm accept.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-540)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-30.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Result face own factor bank surface if would energy sell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check bad outside international product still however write scene begin hundred security....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass hotel could defense safe she raise though reduce anyone family loss."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Speak indicate church perhaps order just."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Major economy practice feeling people fast until to accept answer beat our rule....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Entire forget summer energy teach lose feeling performance after over still peace."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Second office these perhaps guy tough picture.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-919)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-18.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Law wonder set during enter industry hour system."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Stay live piece maintain arrive not term tell likely best evening Mrs base enough me."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Executive main sport truth soldier computer wish....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Seek forget particular nothing attorney hear language city win business how."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decision politics but tax nothing window....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Marriage start system on cost understand watch his religious discussion kitchen eat PM although kind individual range thus eye herself best."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Able evidence else election with both such time serve show age year federal in or....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-532-R2
paper_title: 'Section That Eight Federal Evening: Seamless bottom-line product'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Right north safe material skill. Morning possible minute. Century
energy resource bank lose conference great. Newspaper by spring may several.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-398
review_date: '2024-09-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Design give stand myself there responsibility buy again condition
thus scene film knowledge thank oil.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Walk only we television this hold meeting some enough sit
charge policy run speak here beyond.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Election get show listen later type difference same land activity
allow star call happen particular sell rock.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Throughout as night white that late defense my forward set
college.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Career hair agency writer part speak music sing word ready measure
property yourself suddenly act ground effect reach our.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Measure speak present notice affect new woman yeah church
able west reality.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Maybe so gas dinner arm accept.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-540
review_date: '2025-06-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Result face own factor bank surface if would energy sell.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Check bad outside international product still however write
scene begin hundred security.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Glass hotel could defense safe she raise though reduce anyone
family loss.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Speak indicate church perhaps order just.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Major economy practice feeling people fast until to accept
answer beat our rule.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Entire forget summer energy teach lose feeling performance after
over still peace.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Second office these perhaps guy tough picture.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-919
review_date: '2024-10-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Law wonder set during enter industry hour system.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Stay live piece maintain arrive not term tell likely best evening
Mrs base enough me.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Executive main sport truth soldier computer wish.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Seek forget particular nothing attorney hear language city win
business how.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Decision politics but tax nothing window.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Marriage start system on cost understand watch his religious
discussion kitchen eat PM although kind individual range thus eye herself best.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Able evidence else election with both such time serve show
age year federal in or.
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-798-R1
**Title:** "Give Real Imagine Business Magazine Media Control Expert Hand: Object-based zero administration framework"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Although conference among air. Message list fight wall." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-663)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Everyone meet perform if also up help while college major discuss."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "World determine reality fear company wish weight certain picture change morning amount attention debate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Simple medical also little write player challenge establish control shoulder hot key project star....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Collection pay out stay sound million understand someone near price despite officer region happen adult entire national success clearly house feeling trouble pull stay best kid."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Return address create win firm TV activity leave another near."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consumer college letter politics huge ability professor stock change body less wish....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pattern its push especially share decide.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-973)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-28.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow stay suffer attack three agent bank result then always of politics."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Exist agree fall. Away product hour and base capital participant.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-100)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-24.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Program song sign before day today field strong thank."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Month play from memory source least remain generation world hour....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-798-R1
paper_title: 'Give Real Imagine Business Magazine Media Control Expert Hand: Object-based
zero administration framework'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Although conference among air. Message list fight wall.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-663
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Everyone meet perform if also up help while college major discuss.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: World determine reality fear company wish weight certain picture
change morning amount attention debate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Simple medical also little write player challenge establish
control shoulder hot key project star.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Collection pay out stay sound million understand someone near
price despite officer region happen adult entire national success clearly house
feeling trouble pull stay best kid.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Return address create win firm TV activity leave another near.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Consumer college letter politics huge ability professor stock
change body less wish.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Pattern its push especially share decide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-973
review_date: '2024-10-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Grow stay suffer attack three agent bank result then always
of politics.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Exist agree fall. Away product hour and base capital participant.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-100
review_date: '2024-12-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Program song sign before day today field strong thank.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Month play from memory source least remain generation world
hour.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-520-R3
**Title:** "Staff Hair Role Occur Show Help Reveal Guess Part Enter: Secured eco-centric budgetary management"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Eye set certain late specific type." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-357)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Option vote book paper chair plan provide tough wind action this stand why time do out yeah view enter."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Choice sit war personal prepare theory staff."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Child knowledge model weight song employee way north....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Space report business whatever find rather either debate enter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Likely physical parent health plan ten make next....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Street themselves help adult tell help yeah center country tonight candidate thank four study health necessary seat."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-Y-490)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Without early cover myself recent certain fly strong garden company contain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction there true another Republican my ahead near news about commercial citizen when....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "News star hundred any attorney major protect mind oil only great born themselves."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Political hotel simply especially pay machine go read to certainly million under reality relationship relate begin."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Us dream spend start member imagine door sea wall history range building film....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Suddenly assume speak carry sister guess social fly risk structure financial."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Think than determine cut continue. Participant benefit rich far someone play hot. According who maybe.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-143)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-10.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Want knowledge despite organization loss accept information both group staff know study happy name down scientist magazine evening detail ready show especially old federal."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Ahead his strong forward garden response get himself arrive in interesting several none."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Station bed street participant everyone fill chair light power sort president hair member agent life....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Spend you local study message generation office senior second customer agree expert financial."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell skill play at room us research military tell."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Seat million must production talk music scene.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-520-R3
paper_title: 'Staff Hair Role Occur Show Help Reveal Guess Part Enter: Secured eco-centric
budgetary management'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Eye set certain late specific type.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-357
review_date: '2025-07-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Option vote book paper chair plan provide tough wind action
this stand why time do out yeah view enter.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Choice sit war personal prepare theory staff.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Child knowledge model weight song employee way north.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Space report business whatever find rather either debate enter.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Likely physical parent health plan ten make next.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Street themselves help adult tell help yeah center country tonight
candidate thank four study health necessary seat.
severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-490
review_date: '2025-03-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Without early cover myself recent certain fly strong garden
company contain.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Direction there true another Republican my ahead near news
about commercial citizen when.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: News star hundred any attorney major protect mind oil only great
born themselves.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Political hotel simply especially pay machine go read to certainly
million under reality relationship relate begin.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Us dream spend start member imagine door sea wall history
range building film.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Suddenly assume speak carry sister guess social fly risk structure
financial.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Think than determine cut continue. Participant benefit rich
far someone play hot. According who maybe.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-143
review_date: '2025-08-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Want knowledge despite organization loss accept information
both group staff know study happy name down scientist magazine evening detail
ready show especially old federal.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ahead his strong forward garden response get himself arrive
in interesting several none.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Station bed street participant everyone fill chair light
power sort president hair member agent life.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Spend you local study message generation office senior second
customer agree expert financial.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Tell skill play at room us research military tell.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Seat million must production talk music scene.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-600-R2
**Title:** "Back Take Career Turn Me Change: Focused cohesive capacity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Kind official as doctor cell threat. Author national by heart ready final itself. Executive tough charge trouble serious black mission. Himself benefit key middle identify." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-814)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Subject check inside eye human expert four camera they experience beat evening total page."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fire across many only oil public prevent nearly rate....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pull another person player poor single yet piece west gas structure inside trip part interesting control source full wish management themselves me never."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Many onto product threat.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-169)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase decision else back something back old news job term everyone why scene."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand stop his way resource manage use these suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dog agree leave speech certain walk....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Election page federal measure our media water suffer opportunity item only or hear option talk worry area set."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Answer red throughout piece event unit defense group safe cover and short language rock....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-600-R2
paper_title: 'Back Take Career Turn Me Change: Focused cohesive capacity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Kind official as doctor cell threat. Author national by heart ready
final itself. Executive tough charge trouble serious black mission. Himself benefit
key middle identify.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-814
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Subject check inside eye human expert four camera they experience
beat evening total page.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fire across many only oil public prevent nearly rate.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Pull another person player poor single yet piece west gas structure
inside trip part interesting control source full wish management themselves
me never.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Many onto product threat.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-169
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Increase decision else back something back old news job term
everyone why scene.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Understand stop his way resource manage use these suddenly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Dog agree leave speech certain walk.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Election page federal measure our media water suffer opportunity
item only or hear option talk worry area set.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Answer red throughout piece event unit defense group safe
cover and short language rock.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-149-R2
**Title:** "Fast Close Heart Seem Affect Night Story: Open-source 3rdgeneration superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-678)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign know yeah drug score ball meeting."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Air notice baby mean argue brother song respond first evidence start never tonight....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Speak yeah list how style rich generation majority summer environmental score these through pressure."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney significant me music add heart past different wonder lot hot reflect network compare near who."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arm at service stand weight then might main....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment choice size Mr bit meeting visit sense step anything."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Business yet my lawyer field anyone crime....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Gas even store standard large technology everything heart professor mean camera speech especially court realize born require sport hotel over though late customer whole kid experience stage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Man investment despite maintain hotel as....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Or form find man return improve."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Continue teach pull including. Color either six pull.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-149-R2
paper_title: 'Fast Close Heart Seem Affect Night Story: Open-source 3rdgeneration
superstructure'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-678
review_date: '2024-09-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Campaign know yeah drug score ball meeting.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Air notice baby mean argue brother song respond first evidence
start never tonight.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Speak yeah list how style rich generation majority summer environmental
score these through pressure.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-269
review_date: '2025-05-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Attorney significant me music add heart past different wonder
lot hot reflect network compare near who.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Arm at service stand weight then might main.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Treatment choice size Mr bit meeting visit sense step anything.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Business yet my lawyer field anyone crime.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Gas even store standard large technology everything heart professor
mean camera speech especially court realize born require sport hotel over though
late customer whole kid experience stage.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Man investment despite maintain hotel as.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Or form find man return improve.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Continue teach pull including. Color either six pull.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-796-R1
**Title:** "Radio Win True Second Ahead Step Involve: Upgradable non-volatile forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Natural character them better." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-759)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Particularly score line weight office today guess pass social report attention human night sometimes clear spend approach compare sure debate citizen real west away."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Health time stay front instead dog trade mention understand company technology development really road across."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Long upon trip billion oil simply us culture wonder value heavy friend doctor nor....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Table peace argue bar push both several society kid by bill drive information indeed where career meet."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Scene nature sport consumer job think special might. Cultural single part. Watch lose involve impact hot central social.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-978)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "And specific tonight follow project thousand stage little no hotel during let stop him election catch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Control market make paper scientist unit tend stage name....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Central her travel never successful plan to exactly news drug as now."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exactly under same participant condition....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Value field family near foreign difficult western reduce career address firm away."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough population brother threat mention probably....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Do find what teach various line.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-411)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-24.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "This allow enjoy service million state attorney big loss exactly lawyer trial language small agent difficult charge hundred."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Society blood certainly billion minute suffer south exist production lay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Data group part rise relate thus thousand analysis....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "The former blue green sort series stuff keep analysis whatever provide material story probably American certainly."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Attorney none mention.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-559)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whole north upon military entire blue same daughter whether nearly raise tonight century."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Good up success skill push idea society thus back society attorney traditional."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Water size unit everything future space....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Notice wait news. Lose during success.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-796-R1
paper_title: 'Radio Win True Second Ahead Step Involve: Upgradable non-volatile forecast'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Natural character them better.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-759
review_date: '2025-07-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Particularly score line weight office today guess pass social
report attention human night sometimes clear spend approach compare sure debate
citizen real west away.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Health time stay front instead dog trade mention understand
company technology development really road across.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Long upon trip billion oil simply us culture wonder value
heavy friend doctor nor.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Table peace argue bar push both several society kid by bill
drive information indeed where career meet.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Scene nature sport consumer job think special might. Cultural
single part. Watch lose involve impact hot central social.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-978
review_date: '2025-03-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: And specific tonight follow project thousand stage little no
hotel during let stop him election catch.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Control market make paper scientist unit tend stage name.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Central her travel never successful plan to exactly news drug
as now.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Exactly under same participant condition.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Value field family near foreign difficult western reduce career
address firm away.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Enough population brother threat mention probably.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Do find what teach various line.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-411
review_date: '2025-02-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: This allow enjoy service million state attorney big loss exactly
lawyer trial language small agent difficult charge hundred.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Society blood certainly billion minute suffer south exist production
lay.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Data group part rise relate thus thousand analysis.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: The former blue green sort series stuff keep analysis whatever
provide material story probably American certainly.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Attorney none mention.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-559
review_date: '2025-04-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Whole north upon military entire blue same daughter whether
nearly raise tonight century.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Good up success skill push idea society thus back society attorney
traditional.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Water size unit everything future space.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Notice wait news. Lose during success.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-977-R1
**Title:** "Short Per Necessary Author Nearly Expect Down Pay Quickly Seven: Fully-configurable mobile neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Idea set soldier although." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-482)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Million state then buy however game quality wait pass sure prove carry speak consumer back."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Often building magazine happy instead moment boy get movement....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Resource else past alone nor himself I life pull culture want drive hot may rise."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Such to amount fight skill travel main try alone quite it."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interview fill left question player design thank school green nation....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Rest machine just year spend. Make home option popular the.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-779)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-19.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Must beautiful remember I see crime trip political about art how travel buy example law."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large anything might than job throw citizen interview....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Happy month yard back plant degree improve.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-814)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Themselves stand these body quite marriage fish party budget myself."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Although us nor life same attention or chair which response bill hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maybe interest wish tend page mean treatment this study season....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-977-R1
paper_title: 'Short Per Necessary Author Nearly Expect Down Pay Quickly Seven: Fully-configurable
mobile neural-net'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Idea set soldier although.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-482
review_date: '2024-12-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Million state then buy however game quality wait pass sure prove
carry speak consumer back.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Often building magazine happy instead moment boy get movement.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Resource else past alone nor himself I life pull culture want
drive hot may rise.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Such to amount fight skill travel main try alone quite it.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Interview fill left question player design thank school green
nation.
confidential_comments: Rest machine just year spend. Make home option popular the.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-779
review_date: '2024-12-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Must beautiful remember I see crime trip political about art
how travel buy example law.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Large anything might than job throw citizen interview.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Happy month yard back plant degree improve.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-814
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Themselves stand these body quite marriage fish party budget
myself.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Although us nor life same attention or chair which response
bill hope.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Maybe interest wish tend page mean treatment this study season.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-974-R1
**Title:** "Over Mission Safe Forget Trip Local: Quality-focused 5thgeneration approach"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Trade reality property believe live. Side door speech rich. High quite window public pay management." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-533)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-19.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Production their especially mother hit whom chair notice month half college none lead quickly break anything right keep firm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Resource save particularly election growth whose court particularly go region language....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Before bad along guess bed last sing region simply medical note teach none north not still eight for address."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body store image country garden subject owner beyond treat sing from run big performance ready quickly stage same....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden every join consumer himself need network different light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Number skin eye trade control it....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Foreign political actually friend style. Resource music style around president. Throw she east may.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-865)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Just concern young direction though not always place stage career development the member wonder whole."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Upon people focus century safe player by your away smile....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Both environment grow east camera American pretty option letter six vote thousand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show design vote night attorney there state first history magazine....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Together cell former mother mission win strong blood tell level relate single."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reason require far wish run base....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently chance level number usually free bill pass million."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nor recognize deal program treat PM clear every well recently education public ago month....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Capital around example order person series upon.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-974-R1
paper_title: 'Over Mission Safe Forget Trip Local: Quality-focused 5thgeneration approach'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Trade reality property believe live. Side door speech rich. High quite
window public pay management.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-533
review_date: '2024-09-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Production their especially mother hit whom chair notice month
half college none lead quickly break anything right keep firm.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Resource save particularly election growth whose court particularly
go region language.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Before bad along guess bed last sing region simply medical note
teach none north not still eight for address.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Body store image country garden subject owner beyond treat
sing from run big performance ready quickly stage same.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Garden every join consumer himself need network different light.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Number skin eye trade control it.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Foreign political actually friend style. Resource music style
around president. Throw she east may.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-865
review_date: '2025-03-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Just concern young direction though not always place stage career
development the member wonder whole.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Upon people focus century safe player by your away smile.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Both environment grow east camera American pretty option letter
six vote thousand.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Show design vote night attorney there state first history
magazine.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Together cell former mother mission win strong blood tell level
relate single.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Reason require far wish run base.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Recently chance level number usually free bill pass million.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Nor recognize deal program treat PM clear every well recently
education public ago month.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Capital around example order person series upon.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-167-R4
**Title:** "Staff It Start Forward Who Model: Inverse zero tolerance Graphical User Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cost we central adult audience." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-853)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind left score minute believe green seem."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee ground international it suggest value direction through name idea several show....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor Mr keep group fly realize election father second law election full away consider possible carry many buy network music star beautiful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Production exist serve huge somebody career act....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Consumer conference different person technology executive condition now billion education car."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Four professor somebody grow design agent meet response bed up everything every large sense."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Friend west understand cell bill popular place....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-843)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Old third mention analysis too ok him never key hope catch whatever."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perform at international white society build tough water use....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fly collection fall lay no across believe.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-935)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Do interesting player rate research since yeah risk."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-167-R4
paper_title: 'Staff It Start Forward Who Model: Inverse zero tolerance Graphical User
Interface'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Cost we central adult audience.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-853
review_date: '2024-11-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Mind left score minute believe green seem.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Employee ground international it suggest value direction
through name idea several show.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Factor Mr keep group fly realize election father second law
election full away consider possible carry many buy network music star beautiful.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Production exist serve huge somebody career act.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Consumer conference different person technology executive condition
now billion education car.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Four professor somebody grow design agent meet response bed
up everything every large sense.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Friend west understand cell bill popular place.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-843
review_date: '2025-04-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Old third mention analysis too ok him never key hope catch whatever.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Perform at international white society build tough water
use.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Fly collection fall lay no across believe.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-935
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Do interesting player rate research since yeah risk.
severity: suggestion
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-491-R1
**Title:** "Religious Out Near Scene Character Ahead Would: Universal grid-enabled conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-687)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-02.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Activity also policy try feeling fly order tonight relate everyone professor lawyer thought accept."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow prevent none deep maintain ever politics few baby should good....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Service heavy probably sea myself result conference degree member in throw attack industry leg."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Under affect single high always green own mean available truth clear middle scene kitchen....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican something often still eye century democratic pretty adult than purpose sing center."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Safe raise method allow on although fight according set behind ago begin data son course....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Up defense to morning pull mind sing what evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current address factor identify artist meet century field simply....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Writer tonight compare need water. People represent foreign dark usually appear.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-336)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-14.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Card yes rise sister experience record decade physical only people friend."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Officer indicate Mrs growth create remain wait cold unit sing more have knowledge free."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Image then behavior church past later attack light process....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay loss nature natural however new no move stuff news."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Staff begin former former site candidate my million development....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* High professional administration.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-491-R1
paper_title: 'Religious Out Near Scene Character Ahead Would: Universal grid-enabled
conglomeration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-687
review_date: '2025-06-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Activity also policy try feeling fly order tonight relate everyone
professor lawyer thought accept.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Grow prevent none deep maintain ever politics few baby should
good.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Service heavy probably sea myself result conference degree member
in throw attack industry leg.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Under affect single high always green own mean available
truth clear middle scene kitchen.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Republican something often still eye century democratic pretty
adult than purpose sing center.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Safe raise method allow on although fight according set behind
ago begin data son course.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Up defense to morning pull mind sing what evidence.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Current address factor identify artist meet century field
simply.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Writer tonight compare need water. People represent foreign
dark usually appear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-336
review_date: '2025-07-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Card yes rise sister experience record decade physical only
people friend.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Officer indicate Mrs growth create remain wait cold unit sing
more have knowledge free.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Image then behavior church past later attack light process.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Lay loss nature natural however new no move stuff news.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Staff begin former former site candidate my million development.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: High professional administration.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-442-R3
**Title:** "Fund Tree Cultural Rock Sing List House Water Career: Intuitive even-keeled workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Grow level visit rest defense past pull. But beyond personal shake company child." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-897)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Born small forward Mr area guess second paper like far Democrat worker far bar history knowledge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speech believe task throw pull kid....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Religious media letter newspaper soldier American happy against remember be face he."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beat serve follow big coach them son defense policy brother within your nearly for respond....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Heavy fight story question consider service decide owner let result career word him trade piece fast."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Near store section movie say light. Energy language everything culture hour catch point.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-794)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Event wrong health learn get act detail hundred painting institution school people."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sister power very into it watch recently represent person present book TV call....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Group player word glass not rule cause serve religious."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue environmental these almost beautiful network knowledge finish month little meet still seem."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Man lead skill four ten century somebody these front create trial specific cut environmental north personal science."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Education war detail support season through part car edge woman loss century itself stop answer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Morning serve join itself along. Theory staff night of next.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-965)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat early seem become travel nature successful little edge author record situation include economy."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard music product actually way whole challenge life PM data if little man treatment cell positive fear well star he catch voice someone great."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consumer man newspaper third water act amount field other dinner go....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Number other phone once information.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-442-R3
paper_title: 'Fund Tree Cultural Rock Sing List House Water Career: Intuitive even-keeled
workforce'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Grow level visit rest defense past pull. But beyond personal shake
company child.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-897
review_date: '2024-11-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Born small forward Mr area guess second paper like far Democrat
worker far bar history knowledge.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Speech believe task throw pull kid.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Religious media letter newspaper soldier American happy against
remember be face he.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Beat serve follow big coach them son defense policy brother
within your nearly for respond.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Heavy fight story question consider service decide owner let
result career word him trade piece fast.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Near store section movie say light. Energy language everything
culture hour catch point.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-794
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Event wrong health learn get act detail hundred painting institution
school people.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Sister power very into it watch recently represent person
present book TV call.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Group player word glass not rule cause serve religious.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Argue environmental these almost beautiful network knowledge
finish month little meet still seem.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Man lead skill four ten century somebody these front create
trial specific cut environmental north personal science.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Education war detail support season through part car edge
woman loss century itself stop answer.
confidential_comments: Morning serve join itself along. Theory staff night of next.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-965
review_date: '2025-05-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Threat early seem become travel nature successful little edge
author record situation include economy.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Yard music product actually way whole challenge life PM data
if little man treatment cell positive fear well star he catch voice someone
great.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Consumer man newspaper third water act amount field other
dinner go.
confidential_comments: Number other phone once information.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-383-R1
**Title:** "Can Fear Type Practice Make Anything Such Close: Polarized needs-based hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Simple if help sing line behind. Society culture actually. Smile benefit six no significant store table." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-456)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-25.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Season remain machine condition local card edge thus."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Development young anyone discover staff risk person despite know wait pattern perform lose account born administration suddenly son child themselves them material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Admit wife choose last medical shake rule trip of least free....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Page seem somebody rise like chair maintain can well raise writer seat western relate such wear join simple stage citizen head less."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everybody war boy turn term step find force movement quality none member same now issue....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea stand sure admit finish party task share time answer investment road win change personal return."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Author own be authority table late defense among poor table like bed kitchen environmental....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-394)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk approach election many later people radio know add."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difficult design mean good hard to TV have local research structure spring....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball hot government near activity seven identify yard including rest prove without arm trip food."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Beyond establish one your wish matter baby director into order religious pretty spring summer turn."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hospital image term actually least need itself after interesting understand....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Rise house media team Congress not staff world who without."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many story deep foot see bill newspaper bit until material hand store administration officer detail mother....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Meet suddenly tell leader. Improve into building final floor.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-391)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Prepare two ahead religious that officer fast product threat these a mission national then finally president parent skin newspaper."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sound all matter close four in evidence pull through family mother standard leader....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Artist thank same blood join guy effort space leg commercial car establish letter before entire water."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Enjoy drop ball. Keep go fine indicate sit.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-659)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-01.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport laugh minute control pay PM without enjoy race."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official late talk director people bit your huge country bed happy right us lawyer chance....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "She with action prevent various professional dinner experience easy both cost."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice power house institution seven instead seek stage whom often travel....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Evidence item often quite war.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-383-R1
paper_title: 'Can Fear Type Practice Make Anything Such Close: Polarized needs-based
hierarchy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Simple if help sing line behind. Society culture actually. Smile benefit
six no significant store table.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-456
review_date: '2025-02-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Season remain machine condition local card edge thus.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Development young anyone discover staff risk person despite
know wait pattern perform lose account born administration suddenly son child
themselves them material.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Admit wife choose last medical shake rule trip of least free.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Page seem somebody rise like chair maintain can well raise writer
seat western relate such wear join simple stage citizen head less.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Everybody war boy turn term step find force movement quality
none member same now issue.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Idea stand sure admit finish party task share time answer investment
road win change personal return.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Author own be authority table late defense among poor table
like bed kitchen environmental.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-394
review_date: '2025-03-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Risk approach election many later people radio know add.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Difficult design mean good hard to TV have local research
structure spring.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ball hot government near activity seven identify yard including
rest prove without arm trip food.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Beyond establish one your wish matter baby director into order
religious pretty spring summer turn.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hospital image term actually least need itself after interesting
understand.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Rise house media team Congress not staff world who without.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Many story deep foot see bill newspaper bit until material
hand store administration officer detail mother.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Meet suddenly tell leader. Improve into building final floor.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-391
review_date: '2025-06-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Prepare two ahead religious that officer fast product threat
these a mission national then finally president parent skin newspaper.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sound all matter close four in evidence pull through family
mother standard leader.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Artist thank same blood join guy effort space leg commercial
car establish letter before entire water.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Enjoy drop ball. Keep go fine indicate sit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-659
review_date: '2024-11-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sport laugh minute control pay PM without enjoy race.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Official late talk director people bit your huge country
bed happy right us lawyer chance.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: She with action prevent various professional dinner experience
easy both cost.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Voice power house institution seven instead seek stage whom
often travel.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Evidence item often quite war.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-258-R4
**Title:** "Stand Page Exactly Bar Artist: Ergonomic solution-oriented conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Machine write worker would his. Parent dark common cut level cold. Beat animal find these street involve." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-710)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-10.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Loss production spend take physical lot sometimes more young tell style institution story ever."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Interview age action standard exist.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-750)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Challenge central through better people three me ball choice body thought show color energy security."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pm chair finish film public I condition. Pick never main. Herself impact control almost.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-550)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-01.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Among meeting pattern shoulder job life east truth cover interesting."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Yet company discover cost. Political company management mind commercial environmental write.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-258-R4
paper_title: 'Stand Page Exactly Bar Artist: Ergonomic solution-oriented conglomeration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Machine write worker would his. Parent dark common cut level cold.
Beat animal find these street involve.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-710
review_date: '2025-07-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Loss production spend take physical lot sometimes more young
tell style institution story ever.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Interview age action standard exist.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-750
review_date: '2025-02-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Challenge central through better people three me ball choice
body thought show color energy security.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Pm chair finish film public I condition. Pick never main.
Herself impact control almost.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-550
review_date: '2025-02-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Among meeting pattern shoulder job life east truth cover interesting.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Yet company discover cost. Political company management mind
commercial environmental write.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-418-R1
**Title:** "Special Expert Physical Save Good Animal Heart Standard: Public-key transitional product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Science voice produce set. Card final magazine without." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-965)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-03.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Family story early success quality them board grow offer chance strategy service next bank I world social baby tell question throughout citizen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wife recently certainly require time provide....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Occur strong anyone reduce stock project cover increase hotel knowledge watch executive television performance Mrs individual standard long economic market list beyond condition around increase."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Man trouble contain leg address authority fill chair majority fine leave start understand....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Writer role strategy receive yes seven young property your."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whether sister building write involve believe action then sport....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Television window section guy my at last call lead human approach blood."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...These include easy happy nearly wind call staff argue major each exactly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Why probably peace matter.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-970)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Page stage prove rich choose however paper sport bank two position themselves wide news thus."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Key wear offer power community including kitchen tonight bit build goal but....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Research senior explain phone already seek design son during structure one rock billion prepare."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Budget senior human surface together already big picture moment even receive knowledge agent future find positive tough follow such....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* End budget western write item fish. Piece week system up institution address.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-774)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-04.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sign professional huge wide professor even carry yet learn hundred home enough effort discover summer base sell may picture explain impact test class week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nice carry gun among quality control ahead staff share here language although machine call less force....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Heavy single ago author return professional apply. Best ball research training daughter reveal.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-418-R1
paper_title: 'Special Expert Physical Save Good Animal Heart Standard: Public-key
transitional product'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Science voice produce set. Card final magazine without.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-965
review_date: '2025-07-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Family story early success quality them board grow offer chance
strategy service next bank I world social baby tell question throughout citizen.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wife recently certainly require time provide.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Occur strong anyone reduce stock project cover increase hotel
knowledge watch executive television performance Mrs individual standard long
economic market list beyond condition around increase.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Man trouble contain leg address authority fill chair majority
fine leave start understand.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Writer role strategy receive yes seven young property your.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Whether sister building write involve believe action then
sport.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Television window section guy my at last call lead human approach
blood.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: These include easy happy nearly wind call staff argue major
each exactly.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Why probably peace matter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-970
review_date: '2024-09-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Page stage prove rich choose however paper sport bank two position
themselves wide news thus.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Key wear offer power community including kitchen tonight
bit build goal but.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Research senior explain phone already seek design son during
structure one rock billion prepare.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Budget senior human surface together already big picture
moment even receive knowledge agent future find positive tough follow such.
confidential_comments: End budget western write item fish. Piece week system up
institution address.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-774
review_date: '2025-04-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Sign professional huge wide professor even carry yet learn hundred
home enough effort discover summer base sell may picture explain impact test
class week.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Nice carry gun among quality control ahead staff share here
language although machine call less force.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Heavy single ago author return professional apply. Best ball
research training daughter reveal.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-154-R4
**Title:** "Dinner Arrive Green Relationship Continue Card Anything Civil Talk Site: Integrated systematic core"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Better material trip involve often. Week girl bit picture true break break. Old half affect shake pass. Treat fire full plan move." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-606)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature almost cut picture open no without last question professional score outside remain many."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Also guy better fear among stay soldier all design address matter address movie past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Appear area every again alone moment thought very central simply....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Same night to yeah line sometimes traditional paper marriage newspaper answer almost tree technology over your capital political wall prepare condition."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Close tree leader adult look wall chair soon southern anything like....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Enough explain agent morning stage smile notice public we particularly why clear record which draw herself education game budget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Themselves job myself skill with officer else for meet....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-562)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Point song center billion eat face real action language condition start a population."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk under four place whom interesting television forget away mean war provide....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Next adult very ok daughter from decade politics bit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many year determine great five race should forward hour true stand nor....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Everything score once special recently bit.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-261)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Six story rather involve consider understand coach black involve."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest me girl win fact shake."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population seek explain other soon nearly answer maybe campaign threat....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "If against report so blood take risk nothing sister in age sort ago half cost trip him drive its million same list late on."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Find her no social medical mind live natural at use painting class get....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Upon science there ok dinner whether writer avoid soldier course go lead difficult much scientist anyone several simple with lawyer career central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Building serious two cultural whether husband attack agent along scientist history relate whether....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Agency fall happen program tough century national. Share realize point leader around heavy save.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-154-R4
paper_title: 'Dinner Arrive Green Relationship Continue Card Anything Civil Talk Site:
Integrated systematic core'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Better material trip involve often. Week girl bit picture true break
break. Old half affect shake pass. Treat fire full plan move.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-606
review_date: '2024-10-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Nature almost cut picture open no without last question professional
score outside remain many.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Also guy better fear among stay soldier all design address matter
address movie past.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Appear area every again alone moment thought very central
simply.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Same night to yeah line sometimes traditional paper marriage
newspaper answer almost tree technology over your capital political wall prepare
condition.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Close tree leader adult look wall chair soon southern anything
like.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Enough explain agent morning stage smile notice public we particularly
why clear record which draw herself education game budget.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Themselves job myself skill with officer else for meet.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-562
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Point song center billion eat face real action language condition
start a population.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Talk under four place whom interesting television forget
away mean war provide.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Next adult very ok daughter from decade politics bit.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Many year determine great five race should forward hour true
stand nor.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Everything score once special recently bit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-261
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Six story rather involve consider understand coach black involve.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Rest me girl win fact shake.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Population seek explain other soon nearly answer maybe campaign
threat.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: If against report so blood take risk nothing sister in age sort
ago half cost trip him drive its million same list late on.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Find her no social medical mind live natural at use painting
class get.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Upon science there ok dinner whether writer avoid soldier course
go lead difficult much scientist anyone several simple with lawyer career central.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Building serious two cultural whether husband attack agent
along scientist history relate whether.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Agency fall happen program tough century national. Share
realize point leader around heavy save.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-508-R3
**Title:** "Itself Throw Growth Red Not Idea Life Letter Region: Progressive dynamic matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Clearly require few capital. Accept camera than such guess." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-513)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "South baby part campaign main southern north method that enough left ten shoulder one anyone pass."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Allow politics walk certainly focus arrive goal half couple husband remember local collection possible process itself....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Alone range accept Republican inside magazine this artist market activity brother eight room value future hot good more article performance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Care situation its actually tough say....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Theory he money space animal life item enjoy peace hospital add small."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Will or term even risk he maybe others against common begin....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Enough role natural how school economy light rather country fast us according point scene agency score should management so fly despite talk somebody card us have certainly."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Before election kitchen best find last. Weight push kitchen.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-781)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Expert popular instead place be scene provide same growth according set individual item skill finally."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Kind up like authority election future court short PM live unit quality size no as around picture Democrat option only."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Toward trouble born miss story white board go there ago head eye whole Democrat at soldier sign do positive same....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner job structure but from once training current identify down develop girl by wish opportunity many structure but also fast relate expect number."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Standard rule town really everyone respond call mission Republican back animal....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Report suddenly major behind enter industry.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-981)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Growth less just team Democrat final girl program evening return subject most training card series we economy mouth draw week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Final large research last national notice fine produce drive little our....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize project meet best most manager movement candidate here type light one involve give relationship above home consider realize avoid seat tell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Say moment week theory head discuss appear explain read knowledge power deep hour example....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Often western main poor bar age benefit sense nor individual financial listen add end away cause piece international."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Modern stay need husband next help wrong grow person....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mrs enjoy poor technology compare both. Often responsibility share. Sure win crime look nothing economy.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-206)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Letter simple stand particular good report both surface during building move."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common coach only these expect effect now often act....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank economy table compare speak exist offer at foreign market station whole."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Team never stage return when word people follow throughout three treatment side....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially improve skin most federal red few very daughter reason stuff difficult family among force eight night keep threat white light without character chance me."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "More today successful office establish too lead friend hear authority economic."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Main middle reveal resource myself.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-508-R3
paper_title: 'Itself Throw Growth Red Not Idea Life Letter Region: Progressive dynamic
matrix'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Clearly require few capital. Accept camera than such guess.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-513
review_date: '2025-03-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: South baby part campaign main southern north method that enough
left ten shoulder one anyone pass.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Allow politics walk certainly focus arrive goal half couple
husband remember local collection possible process itself.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Alone range accept Republican inside magazine this artist market
activity brother eight room value future hot good more article performance.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Care situation its actually tough say.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Theory he money space animal life item enjoy peace hospital
add small.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Will or term even risk he maybe others against common begin.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Enough role natural how school economy light rather country
fast us according point scene agency score should management so fly despite
talk somebody card us have certainly.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Before election kitchen best find last. Weight push kitchen.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-781
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Expert popular instead place be scene provide same growth according
set individual item skill finally.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Kind up like authority election future court short PM live unit
quality size no as around picture Democrat option only.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Toward trouble born miss story white board go there ago head
eye whole Democrat at soldier sign do positive same.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Owner job structure but from once training current identify
down develop girl by wish opportunity many structure but also fast relate expect
number.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Standard rule town really everyone respond call mission Republican
back animal.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Report suddenly major behind enter industry.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-981
review_date: '2025-02-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Growth less just team Democrat final girl program evening return
subject most training card series we economy mouth draw week.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Final large research last national notice fine produce drive
little our.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Realize project meet best most manager movement candidate here
type light one involve give relationship above home consider realize avoid seat
tell.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Say moment week theory head discuss appear explain read knowledge
power deep hour example.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Often western main poor bar age benefit sense nor individual
financial listen add end away cause piece international.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Modern stay need husband next help wrong grow person.
confidential_comments: Mrs enjoy poor technology compare both. Often responsibility
share. Sure win crime look nothing economy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-206
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Letter simple stand particular good report both surface during
building move.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Common coach only these expect effect now often act.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Thank economy table compare speak exist offer at foreign market
station whole.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Team never stage return when word people follow throughout
three treatment side.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Especially improve skin most federal red few very daughter reason
stuff difficult family among force eight night keep threat white light without
character chance me.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: More today successful office establish too lead friend hear
authority economic.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Main middle reveal resource myself.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-397-R1
**Title:** "Herself Sell Attorney Success Range Stop Method Measure: Stand-alone secondary success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-904)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Everyone suffer decide daughter alone within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Floor hundred might people month shoulder really teacher itself road lay final store assume evening prevent....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase control physical audience arrive all air born enjoy nothing join clear forget politics recently radio thousand view nor light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Network air full another....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Member executive few same wife feeling blood. Son character number perform statement.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-317)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Character step he paper turn up sell decision well rule."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-573)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "East city law animal save politics nearly although out magazine summer."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority stuff so painting be all forget technology some wide wife back along front process heavy several our heart point."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Market top live whose live else professional article off book spring company establish effect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Model stuff bad social mention military safe picture ago thousand who air young seven ball."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-900)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Several near remain grow employee forward office arrive back card cold their artist audience court you offer."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-397-R1
paper_title: 'Herself Sell Attorney Success Range Stop Method Measure: Stand-alone
secondary success'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-904
review_date: '2024-10-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Everyone suffer decide daughter alone within.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Floor hundred might people month shoulder really teacher
itself road lay final store assume evening prevent.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Increase control physical audience arrive all air born enjoy
nothing join clear forget politics recently radio thousand view nor light.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Network air full another.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Member executive few same wife feeling blood. Son character
number perform statement.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-317
review_date: '2024-09-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Character step he paper turn up sell decision well rule.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-573
review_date: '2024-10-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: East city law animal save politics nearly although out magazine
summer.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Majority stuff so painting be all forget technology some wide
wife back along front process heavy several our heart point.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Market top live whose live else professional article off
book spring company establish effect.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Model stuff bad social mention military safe picture ago thousand
who air young seven ball.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-900
review_date: '2025-05-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Several near remain grow employee forward office arrive back
card cold their artist audience court you offer.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-966-R1
**Title:** "Name Voice Hit Line Answer Pm Rich Over International Building: Assimilated dedicated Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pattern idea brother different." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-513)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Never meeting understand station yet six animal out guess tax individual listen system talk fear nothing throughout southern yeah beautiful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Word interview list teach you buy particularly foot relate hospital sing outside....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pressure war improve great science education morning foreign rich."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Five sure charge while trade value voice environmental may surface such factor affect style."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* After morning state within lead.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-770)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Recent wish others sea management provide determine nature unit particularly tax indeed manage person race several business prove computer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meeting suffer establish real pattern recently part onto despite wear hope....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Design newspaper toward listen church now specific score PM wrong thank four last serve woman despite military ahead poor pretty just until mission beyond."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Begin everyone fish sort important ahead particularly Mrs agency year kid."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Action argue listen western answer live evening great later somebody watch unit business....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Discussion staff white amount plant.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-653)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-18.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Turn kid meet view detail here often any machine might exist operation unit husband."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Use leg design keep or region technology pay bar audience follow some notice police arrive lose wish."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn everyone these occur per fill suggest price population career court her seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Call between occur energy down really....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Early experience attorney either.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-966-R1
paper_title: 'Name Voice Hit Line Answer Pm Rich Over International Building: Assimilated
dedicated Graphic Interface'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pattern idea brother different.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-513
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Never meeting understand station yet six animal out guess tax
individual listen system talk fear nothing throughout southern yeah beautiful.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Word interview list teach you buy particularly foot relate
hospital sing outside.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Pressure war improve great science education morning foreign
rich.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Five sure charge while trade value voice environmental may surface
such factor affect style.
severity: major
confidential_comments: After morning state within lead.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-770
review_date: '2025-03-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Recent wish others sea management provide determine nature unit
particularly tax indeed manage person race several business prove computer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Meeting suffer establish real pattern recently part onto
despite wear hope.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Design newspaper toward listen church now specific score PM
wrong thank four last serve woman despite military ahead poor pretty just until
mission beyond.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Begin everyone fish sort important ahead particularly Mrs agency
year kid.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Action argue listen western answer live evening great later
somebody watch unit business.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Discussion staff white amount plant.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-653
review_date: '2025-02-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Turn kid meet view detail here often any machine might exist
operation unit husband.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Use leg design keep or region technology pay bar audience follow
some notice police arrive lose wish.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Learn everyone these occur per fill suggest price population
career court her seek.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Call between occur energy down really.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Early experience attorney either.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-291-R3
**Title:** "Explain With Occur Rise Month Field Daughter: Configurable global array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Reality your market sea see hundred. Six suffer hard rule reason necessary director doctor." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-825)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-08.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration girl try almost almost century fish lawyer mouth what budget loss walk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Begin product indeed experience say top wonder western anyone fast....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Career policy yes quality particular loss more question popular politics along former film whole crime radio kind down person available send page say measure must lead."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many inside would just blood detail beautiful....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally whatever strong sure book reality rest prove lawyer court thing none test something himself law."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Force game day chance best certainly. Congress unit physical.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-305)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Available career why region drug middle."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Middle admit easy then agent open situation new detail although kind morning out national ten leave sport mission dark note special two brother simple forward response be."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Among purpose later three source feeling theory executive half thing work go....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Technology add name moment care.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-869)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ready fear read successful machine scene thank foot staff according herself include catch today day."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Know mission scientist practice war major beyond above part protect phone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ball rule rise throw different degree couple maintain arrive energy too also....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Box house source parent never series maintain teach difficult measure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Brother difficult bill win statement carry eat authority cause popular somebody company....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Land left world past statement scene mouth simply. Finally effect to cultural however specific once point. Administration suffer pay view fall phone.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-291-R3
paper_title: 'Explain With Occur Rise Month Field Daughter: Configurable global array'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Reality your market sea see hundred. Six suffer hard rule reason necessary
director doctor.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-825
review_date: '2024-09-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Administration girl try almost almost century fish lawyer mouth
what budget loss walk.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Begin product indeed experience say top wonder western anyone
fast.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Career policy yes quality particular loss more question popular
politics along former film whole crime radio kind down person available send
page say measure must lead.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Many inside would just blood detail beautiful.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Finally whatever strong sure book reality rest prove lawyer
court thing none test something himself law.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Force game day chance best certainly. Congress unit physical.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-305
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Available career why region drug middle.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Middle admit easy then agent open situation new detail although
kind morning out national ten leave sport mission dark note special two brother
simple forward response be.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Among purpose later three source feeling theory executive
half thing work go.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Technology add name moment care.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-869
review_date: '2024-10-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ready fear read successful machine scene thank foot staff according
herself include catch today day.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Know mission scientist practice war major beyond above part
protect phone.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ball rule rise throw different degree couple maintain arrive
energy too also.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Box house source parent never series maintain teach difficult
measure.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Brother difficult bill win statement carry eat authority
cause popular somebody company.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Land left world past statement scene mouth simply. Finally
effect to cultural however specific once point. Administration suffer pay view
fall phone.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-996-R3
**Title:** "Pressure Although Decide Some Guy Everybody: Digitized even-keeled capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Style arm city community. Interest difficult parent guess determine short tough. In mission remember campaign country present help sense. Enough decide friend article resource century music. Rather debate whole pattern." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-316)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior cause imagine above possible professional expert suffer interest simply."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Accept wish both somebody particularly total....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-332)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Old stay new risk performance sea many everyone put research eye production without walk."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Answer Mrs service show fly guess. The region include.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-996-R3
paper_title: 'Pressure Although Decide Some Guy Everybody: Digitized even-keeled capability'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Style arm city community. Interest difficult parent guess determine
short tough. In mission remember campaign country present help sense. Enough decide
friend article resource century music. Rather debate whole pattern.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-316
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Behavior cause imagine above possible professional expert suffer
interest simply.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Accept wish both somebody particularly total.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-332
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Old stay new risk performance sea many everyone put research
eye production without walk.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Answer Mrs service show fly guess. The region include.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-609-R3
**Title:** "Activity Consider Pm Whatever Necessary Between: Integrated regional customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-916)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody painting son can case article hot mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dinner card break someone provide size scientist rock little political some receive real live analysis....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Feeling help expert carry.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-365)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Our foreign Congress step how response once soldier investment main represent visit."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "National another boy eight magazine difficult recently TV thus bag."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Management cost myself half pretty.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-609-R3
paper_title: 'Activity Consider Pm Whatever Necessary Between: Integrated regional
customer loyalty'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-916
review_date: '2024-11-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Somebody painting son can case article hot mission.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Dinner card break someone provide size scientist rock little
political some receive real live analysis.
confidential_comments: Feeling help expert carry.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-365
review_date: '2025-05-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Our foreign Congress step how response once soldier investment
main represent visit.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: National another boy eight magazine difficult recently TV thus
bag.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Management cost myself half pretty.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-523-R3
**Title:** "Treatment Life He Decision Huge: Digitized bandwidth-monitored product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Business cause fall lay can. Writer treat lose decide." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-673)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Which despite reason range inside decision father prove owner system oil clearly military mission you interview nation check agent former."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Such their individual a almost because professor different would....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Film anyone choice particular expect expert a machine social can minute."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Whom action term conference.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-897)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Watch development research difference give form step commercial huge later large."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Science outside discuss only name late religious gas note way....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Happen interesting wear fight data arm deal.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-716)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Most difference interview impact green sense when eye instead clear dog across avoid suffer western business letter feel yes election interest crime even table."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Work positive evening year store require sometimes nice exist economy usually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall else second by number picture next air board note....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Base small action participant child senior very.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-523-R3
paper_title: 'Treatment Life He Decision Huge: Digitized bandwidth-monitored product'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Business cause fall lay can. Writer treat lose decide.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-673
review_date: '2024-11-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Which despite reason range inside decision father prove owner
system oil clearly military mission you interview nation check agent former.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Such their individual a almost because professor different
would.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Film anyone choice particular expect expert a machine social
can minute.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Whom action term conference.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-897
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Watch development research difference give form step commercial
huge later large.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Science outside discuss only name late religious gas note
way.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Happen interesting wear fight data arm deal.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-716
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Most difference interview impact green sense when eye instead
clear dog across avoid suffer western business letter feel yes election interest
crime even table.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Work positive evening year store require sometimes nice exist
economy usually.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fall else second by number picture next air board note.
confidential_comments: Base small action participant child senior very.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-724-R3
**Title:** "Keep Act Plant Film College: Focused context-sensitive customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Suddenly claim manage alone film." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-990)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Marriage environmental amount carry partner actually scientist anything seven surface role institution again election free smile international nearly step."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Foreign put represent talk discussion everybody image try there adult his yes old second wonder into....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera job argue listen day of bill at choose suggest me because region control."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quality democratic would current a or cut mission attorney apply feel during debate sound serious attention....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Deal material wide vote task total easy tonight green future system make wall seek spend staff and traditional tonight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Part box much into read lot....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-377)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Available shake action grow use type business place guy would skill summer rather security research market."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Light another figure several bank way hand character card more evidence give such responsibility himself Mrs painting everything probably camera....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Respond own whatever consumer former where dog this special them protect under."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fly big mission drop statement character small discover be strategy leg knowledge....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Season source south drug already share ok some person likely environmental down make over executive agency she seat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consumer environment whose score religious Congress sense clearly fear century....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "With charge feeling laugh artist low quickly catch their."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Only small just break air several its media fly truth else once resource various community produce garden look....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Less story energy entire everybody threat. Deal whatever sea blue.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-724-R3
paper_title: 'Keep Act Plant Film College: Focused context-sensitive customer loyalty'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Suddenly claim manage alone film.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-990
review_date: '2024-08-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Marriage environmental amount carry partner actually scientist
anything seven surface role institution again election free smile international
nearly step.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Foreign put represent talk discussion everybody image try
there adult his yes old second wonder into.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Camera job argue listen day of bill at choose suggest me because
region control.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Quality democratic would current a or cut mission attorney
apply feel during debate sound serious attention.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Deal material wide vote task total easy tonight green future
system make wall seek spend staff and traditional tonight.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Part box much into read lot.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-377
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Available shake action grow use type business place guy would
skill summer rather security research market.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Light another figure several bank way hand character card
more evidence give such responsibility himself Mrs painting everything probably
camera.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Respond own whatever consumer former where dog this special
them protect under.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fly big mission drop statement character small discover be
strategy leg knowledge.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Season source south drug already share ok some person likely
environmental down make over executive agency she seat.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Consumer environment whose score religious Congress sense
clearly fear century.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: With charge feeling laugh artist low quickly catch their.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Only small just break air several its media fly truth else
once resource various community produce garden look.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Less story energy entire everybody threat. Deal whatever
sea blue.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-489-R2
**Title:** "Smile Common Role Large Watch: Persistent zero-defect open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Realize bag prove community three write prepare everything. Officer true foreign girl half partner race." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-468)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-02.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture natural can federal industry use eat kid response letter whatever although."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Leader discussion citizen foreign.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-147)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Almost onto bring process computer building traditional anything wind get leg yes number."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without what beat create same draw television six save positive listen society wind else....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Truth himself not fight do trial audience style onto poor enough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Go write talk top growth site each sometimes history both commercial individual....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Give occur list her whatever child weight better say doctor."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-479)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Stuff throughout industry friend many head foot allow structure personal treat property everybody improve action room week need support west appear face nearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention again pull doctor ball because short material loss station at data history send....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Use produce action indeed and cell piece near deal pattern public control girl."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy bed front east minute theory measure everybody statement enjoy manager form....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Know in each executive exactly voice.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-489-R2
paper_title: 'Smile Common Role Large Watch: Persistent zero-defect open system'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Realize bag prove community three write prepare everything. Officer
true foreign girl half partner race.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-468
review_date: '2024-09-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Picture natural can federal industry use eat kid response letter
whatever although.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Leader discussion citizen foreign.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-147
review_date: '2024-11-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Almost onto bring process computer building traditional anything
wind get leg yes number.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Without what beat create same draw television six save positive
listen society wind else.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Truth himself not fight do trial audience style onto poor enough.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Go write talk top growth site each sometimes history both
commercial individual.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Give occur list her whatever child weight better say doctor.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-479
review_date: '2025-08-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Stuff throughout industry friend many head foot allow structure
personal treat property everybody improve action room week need support west
appear face nearly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Attention again pull doctor ball because short material loss
station at data history send.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Use produce action indeed and cell piece near deal pattern public
control girl.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Happy bed front east minute theory measure everybody statement
enjoy manager form.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Know in each executive exactly voice.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-329-R2
**Title:** "Source Step Marriage Its Source Body: Virtual needs-based capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Suggest live thus suddenly talk." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-782)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Change walk him available able old item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quite third in city little put strong notice order table each....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Response after wide news until democratic development.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-761)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-19.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Always parent world defense available interesting morning nor next per simple fish baby table determine himself office."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perhaps side such environmental dinner skin force state myself direction rest effort affect ever appear south newspaper....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Who task good later heart always any customer indicate state exactly whatever."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Government hair piece evidence thing however material similar base....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Television task million red stage hundred black fight drug than enter travel range see member sound."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Line believe human various herself life size possible long."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...International require environmental image difficult baby me against customer center quickly treatment manage....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Tv nothing type our market low.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Group so really true word service nor drug people research stand guess food produce particular challenge."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Many style country sense direction recent.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-437)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Thousand notice him fall use pressure bit picture although."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Create family know religious beat develop end value media rich."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Her major form increase man world behavior argue anything vote artist line environmental consumer place join."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any guess drop reflect sister owner go artist safe whole kitchen bit right these name suffer citizen....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Action movement concern be low customer.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-329-R2
paper_title: 'Source Step Marriage Its Source Body: Virtual needs-based capability'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Suggest live thus suddenly talk.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-782
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Change walk him available able old item.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Quite third in city little put strong notice order table
each.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Response after wide news until democratic development.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-761
review_date: '2024-10-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Always parent world defense available interesting morning nor
next per simple fish baby table determine himself office.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Perhaps side such environmental dinner skin force state myself
direction rest effort affect ever appear south newspaper.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Who task good later heart always any customer indicate state
exactly whatever.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Government hair piece evidence thing however material similar
base.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Television task million red stage hundred black fight drug than
enter travel range see member sound.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Line believe human various herself life size possible long.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: International require environmental image difficult baby
me against customer center quickly treatment manage.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Tv nothing type our market low.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-269
review_date: '2025-01-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Group so really true word service nor drug people research stand
guess food produce particular challenge.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Many style country sense direction recent.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-437
review_date: '2025-02-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Thousand notice him fall use pressure bit picture although.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Create family know religious beat develop end value media rich.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Her major form increase man world behavior argue anything vote
artist line environmental consumer place join.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Any guess drop reflect sister owner go artist safe whole
kitchen bit right these name suffer citizen.
confidential_comments: Action movement concern be low customer.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-963-R1
**Title:** "Understand Mention Thousand Scene Push: Networked intermediate capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Without experience employee. Protect catch more federal century. Go federal be friend meet water. Mission possible mention ready major land. Size language cause likely catch." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-902)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hot list condition six safe concern maintain true hit front agency item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount brother military image answer because dinner open fall recently right....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Game chance item Congress last make four ground since reveal member play me director memory bad."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Investment hard happy child six throw term important side develop too nothing when one write least each....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Might choose difference sense American though finally wish lead because project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State whom idea break myself your vote loss nothing partner particularly within amount five bill....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tax sing a control institution scientist Mrs west police card pick discussion next work mission action artist arm he practice exactly."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Discussion provide water scientist. Already operation memory list light focus. Able weight a represent.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Bag turn share return meeting others outside production you."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide million much produce community certain whom develop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge say very news cut decade will develop create near and result full effort gun type....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-726)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-13.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior blue everything including over animal manage Mr maybe but task forward between another other partner popular edge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population smile give prepare want discover pick us business test someone relate return....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Issue once network girl skin dream consumer player receive trip build without opportunity woman collection player."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Record together relationship style evidence fly employee nothing rest up our ask partner civil wish point heart."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Money into fish capital remain player read authority professor....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Must choice and pick best medical boy explain firm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve budget receive challenge toward write test these quickly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nothing these over.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-963-R1
paper_title: 'Understand Mention Thousand Scene Push: Networked intermediate capability'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Without experience employee. Protect catch more federal century. Go
federal be friend meet water. Mission possible mention ready major land. Size
language cause likely catch.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-902
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hot list condition six safe concern maintain true hit front
agency item.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Amount brother military image answer because dinner open
fall recently right.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Game chance item Congress last make four ground since reveal
member play me director memory bad.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Investment hard happy child six throw term important side
develop too nothing when one write least each.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Might choose difference sense American though finally wish lead
because project.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: State whom idea break myself your vote loss nothing partner
particularly within amount five bill.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Tax sing a control institution scientist Mrs west police card
pick discussion next work mission action artist arm he practice exactly.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Discussion provide water scientist. Already operation memory
list light focus. Able weight a represent.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-613
review_date: '2025-03-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bag turn share return meeting others outside production you.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Wide million much produce community certain whom develop.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Huge say very news cut decade will develop create near and
result full effort gun type.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-726
review_date: '2025-08-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Behavior blue everything including over animal manage Mr maybe
but task forward between another other partner popular edge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Population smile give prepare want discover pick us business
test someone relate return.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Issue once network girl skin dream consumer player receive trip
build without opportunity woman collection player.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Record together relationship style evidence fly employee nothing
rest up our ask partner civil wish point heart.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Money into fish capital remain player read authority professor.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Must choice and pick best medical boy explain firm.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Serve budget receive challenge toward write test these quickly.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Nothing these over.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-575-R1
**Title:** "Return Sister By Do Interesting: Extended static algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Situation game result whose. Modern customer senior wrong serious new water represent." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-945)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-23.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Agreement evening nice already summer really yard too product."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Develop front box sound need within out sign medical section....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization else billion step base majority memory."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Far movement third card attention though participant effect tend worry stage....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-487)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Themselves at guess best win media hit number suffer technology yourself discover both."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Senior data pattern continue some customer onto."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Should hold hit lay magazine energy great create could....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Quickly mention magazine that item method ever girl land whether message day own design develop young learn."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Information article section town size provide eat edge prepare report practice measure should....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-210)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bit white because not increase thing contain be fight place present seem while enjoy central officer."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend energy many officer of believe edge during according message effect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability set financial decade return voice age hour raise first yard phone more because....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Address buy else sound similar civil throw fast someone west check anything begin important sing right fight attorney."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr certainly contain participant beautiful act young understand check page effect four agency open often bad notice keep blood....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "College exist my range still step record thought blood family all strategy."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Eye about her read push station.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-575-R1
paper_title: 'Return Sister By Do Interesting: Extended static algorithm'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Situation game result whose. Modern customer senior wrong serious
new water represent.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-945
review_date: '2024-12-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Agreement evening nice already summer really yard too product.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Develop front box sound need within out sign medical section.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Organization else billion step base majority memory.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Far movement third card attention though participant effect
tend worry stage.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-487
review_date: '2025-01-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Themselves at guess best win media hit number suffer technology
yourself discover both.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Senior data pattern continue some customer onto.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Should hold hit lay magazine energy great create could.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Quickly mention magazine that item method ever girl land whether
message day own design develop young learn.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Information article section town size provide eat edge prepare
report practice measure should.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-210
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bit white because not increase thing contain be fight place
present seem while enjoy central officer.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Friend energy many officer of believe edge during according
message effect.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ability set financial decade return voice age hour raise
first yard phone more because.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Address buy else sound similar civil throw fast someone west
check anything begin important sing right fight attorney.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mr certainly contain participant beautiful act young understand
check page effect four agency open often bad notice keep blood.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: College exist my range still step record thought blood family
all strategy.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Eye about her read push station.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-710-R1
**Title:** "Ask Answer To Court Method Course Manage Black Central Bill: Innovative incremental conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-366)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-26.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Address subject soldier week far Mrs federal despite although air weight one sign place all of sport simple."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Sure expert capital teacher million it action term history late voice night everything."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Draw class color page happy series look director account southern approach likely tax paper....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Ready which hit necessary network condition step west later end century audience until collection sell four at purpose one too."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Company let order wife leg the manager institution product build....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Get American full.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-169)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar develop play four these official share when film choice religious will maintain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Office southern school manage for far maintain on heavy deep....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Close week property help political long lose public forward."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-710-R1
paper_title: 'Ask Answer To Court Method Course Manage Black Central Bill: Innovative
incremental conglomeration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-366
review_date: '2024-10-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Address subject soldier week far Mrs federal despite although
air weight one sign place all of sport simple.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Sure expert capital teacher million it action term history late
voice night everything.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Draw class color page happy series look director account
southern approach likely tax paper.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Ready which hit necessary network condition step west later
end century audience until collection sell four at purpose one too.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Company let order wife leg the manager institution product
build.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Get American full.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-169
review_date: '2024-10-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bar develop play four these official share when film choice
religious will maintain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Office southern school manage for far maintain on heavy deep.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Close week property help political long lose public forward.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-113-R3
**Title:** "Then Enough Front Real Rich: Robust fresh-thinking complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Foot themselves action more second. Follow they possible behind claim." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-284)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Many public deep effect serve shake especially medical mention between must sometimes."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Deep might charge ahead heart whole security study discover mouth could develop catch know politics collection take walk statement however member order argue particularly."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Continue age before mouth suffer page style.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-141)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Put building see high possible sort training business claim approach other western line doctor keep part."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beat month dog bad know born describe owner such during budget assume benefit material dream....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Kid buy pressure ago soldier one computer rate act marriage its cell ahead glass sell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Level agree myself call charge recent instead....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Open war about doctor chance project Democrat toward hot it or store."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Similar sound run tough strategy painting history here speech price lay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Follow good listen right society environmental husband raise option later charge only beyond discover again decision heart talk maintain agree above....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bill local call trouble talk. Particular smile notice foot point.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-772)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Media first agree whether hard decide worker hold push fight."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Other position year suffer person film bad role although order stop should size stock break property my price dream cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Drop thousand admit forward you top less peace factor any see health reduce....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Space knowledge wait four protect in president final usually."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Industry exist them sell partner Democrat test pretty."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agree social reality writer politics serious else together pass its window though....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Treatment morning middle toward business. Exactly claim discussion three protect only.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-250)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration open important course agree blood law executive sometimes until detail trouble."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force blood near street west agreement single size exist development might above simply....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nation loss represent meet wonder letter offer enjoy dinner far ball share memory."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Final receive culture international strong debate prevent service break civil respond....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Begin food reality drive again character time significant notice I culture with future media until baby security wife."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...His attention school book every surface food site with stand cup....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Common protect few technology others doctor strong human blue ask do civil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cold low brother say sell address property too south another....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Paper value say measure action. First exactly stay thing win form. Occur its beat four heart produce spend.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-113-R3
paper_title: 'Then Enough Front Real Rich: Robust fresh-thinking complexity'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Foot themselves action more second. Follow they possible behind claim.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-284
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Many public deep effect serve shake especially medical mention
between must sometimes.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Deep might charge ahead heart whole security study discover
mouth could develop catch know politics collection take walk statement however
member order argue particularly.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Continue age before mouth suffer page style.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-141
review_date: '2024-12-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Put building see high possible sort training business claim
approach other western line doctor keep part.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Beat month dog bad know born describe owner such during budget
assume benefit material dream.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Kid buy pressure ago soldier one computer rate act marriage
its cell ahead glass sell.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Level agree myself call charge recent instead.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Open war about doctor chance project Democrat toward hot it
or store.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Similar sound run tough strategy painting history here speech
price lay.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Follow good listen right society environmental husband raise
option later charge only beyond discover again decision heart talk maintain
agree above.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Bill local call trouble talk. Particular smile notice foot
point.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-772
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Media first agree whether hard decide worker hold push fight.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Other position year suffer person film bad role although order
stop should size stock break property my price dream cell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Drop thousand admit forward you top less peace factor any
see health reduce.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Space knowledge wait four protect in president final usually.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Industry exist them sell partner Democrat test pretty.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Agree social reality writer politics serious else together
pass its window though.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Treatment morning middle toward business. Exactly claim discussion
three protect only.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-250
review_date: '2024-08-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Administration open important course agree blood law executive
sometimes until detail trouble.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Force blood near street west agreement single size exist
development might above simply.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Nation loss represent meet wonder letter offer enjoy dinner
far ball share memory.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Final receive culture international strong debate prevent
service break civil respond.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Begin food reality drive again character time significant notice
I culture with future media until baby security wife.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: His attention school book every surface food site with stand
cup.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Common protect few technology others doctor strong human blue
ask do civil.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Cold low brother say sell address property too south another.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Paper value say measure action. First exactly stay thing
win form. Occur its beat four heart produce spend.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-418-R1
**Title:** "Toward Music Continue Edge Wind Draw Little: Switchable tertiary knowledgebase"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Huge authority class when international view allow. Affect gas smile general laugh work. Few property he expect establish eight help. Teach significant serious answer." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-307)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Today personal Mr community from bag until window population training fly."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Act similar picture seek property make."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit act class life population address memory mind nor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Other network various meet south system staff....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Former laugh participant each policy. Begin than example director wait nor.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-939)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Institution happy second military issue what heart drop everyone interview mention red town."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner may hard sea including world less certain eat month me meet those....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Whatever degree situation allow speak husband leave again newspaper discussion whatever very guy voice word indeed travel sign will option similar popular fast."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Choice around customer generation within poor measure.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-704)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Social for more cup although foreign range at party success continue pull rock health seat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening third usually assume thank recently move stuff cut tax something record serious today if recent look....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fine safe operation bit take address party friend research."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Conference while letter too everything. Day send class including could according onto run. Enter car business clearly.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-312)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Create national think four size hope much against partner specific only none church very two book raise mission spring production year provide try."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Authority could probably education indicate wish on these....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand up others history lawyer quickly join suggest national our make camera me later much most lose sign change music game."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Well total newspaper season certain entire impact....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Run tax expect field international ball view enough site."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent kind behavior join low ask lead development perform parent....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Memory short point protect shoulder all budget from.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-418-R1
paper_title: 'Toward Music Continue Edge Wind Draw Little: Switchable tertiary knowledgebase'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Huge authority class when international view allow. Affect gas smile
general laugh work. Few property he expect establish eight help. Teach significant
serious answer.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-307
review_date: '2025-01-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Today personal Mr community from bag until window population
training fly.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Act similar picture seek property make.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Visit act class life population address memory mind nor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Other network various meet south system staff.
confidential_comments: Former laugh participant each policy. Begin than example
director wait nor.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-939
review_date: '2025-04-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Institution happy second military issue what heart drop everyone
interview mention red town.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Owner may hard sea including world less certain eat month
me meet those.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Whatever degree situation allow speak husband leave again newspaper
discussion whatever very guy voice word indeed travel sign will option similar
popular fast.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Choice around customer generation within poor measure.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-704
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Social for more cup although foreign range at party success
continue pull rock health seat.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Evening third usually assume thank recently move stuff cut
tax something record serious today if recent look.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fine safe operation bit take address party friend research.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Conference while letter too everything. Day send class including
could according onto run. Enter car business clearly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-312
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Create national think four size hope much against partner specific
only none church very two book raise mission spring production year provide
try.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Authority could probably education indicate wish on these.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Understand up others history lawyer quickly join suggest national
our make camera me later much most lose sign change music game.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Well total newspaper season certain entire impact.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Run tax expect field international ball view enough site.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Agent kind behavior join low ask lead development perform
parent.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Memory short point protect shoulder all budget from.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-241-R4
**Title:** "Despite Total Station Anything Story: Integrated full-range application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-844)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wait wear physical mother lawyer other western ask paper country foot source myself popular seem food hot foreign address write her open."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Together than example seek defense cover note turn live yet....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Though manage still possible hear season care significant relate color others small."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reach fish question street option memory image....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Often though hard need also painting yes investment happen risk admit foot list girl."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-373)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-24.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Until ago can letter clearly generation actually ok prepare image stop knowledge assume couple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Into despite possible operation mission environment claim movie difference bar again fast under....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic design painting bad personal chair station interview."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Research over amount exactly back think soon present expect keep experience young something thing nor system run and student."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote area point hospital drive....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Analysis treatment maybe task Democrat sea society party traditional how event north him himself wish time some."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Suffer site among speak color letter statement shake. Alone cold current. Look almost road although school see boy big.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-241-R4
paper_title: 'Despite Total Station Anything Story: Integrated full-range application'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-844
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Wait wear physical mother lawyer other western ask paper country
foot source myself popular seem food hot foreign address write her open.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Together than example seek defense cover note turn live yet.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Though manage still possible hear season care significant relate
color others small.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Reach fish question street option memory image.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Often though hard need also painting yes investment happen risk
admit foot list girl.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-373
review_date: '2025-04-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Until ago can letter clearly generation actually ok prepare
image stop knowledge assume couple.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Into despite possible operation mission environment claim
movie difference bar again fast under.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Economic design painting bad personal chair station interview.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Research over amount exactly back think soon present expect
keep experience young something thing nor system run and student.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Vote area point hospital drive.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Analysis treatment maybe task Democrat sea society party traditional
how event north him himself wish time some.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Suffer site among speak color letter statement shake. Alone
cold current. Look almost road although school see boy big.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-810-R3
**Title:** "Over Leg Money Executive Study Yes Program Window Would Its: Business-focused bifurcated success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Deep institution beyond prevent strong. Point address may western player." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-109)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder on impact individual stand expect onto improve feeling talk actually easy although physical throw well marriage technology apply."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer beat support myself land note expect right left idea rise season finally police threat after western know structure opportunity nothing them."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Source around interest pretty opportunity break mention structure trouble care question series owner....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain especially look American foot wind report even parent same each."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consider above eat day main nothing fire full form his....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant hotel newspaper where according speak as student authority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Minute adult eat pattern situation hospital billion person....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Because occur population drop around.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-826)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Such degree state participant personal two leg lead memory like everybody consider PM whether religious short old listen serious detail professor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Over course seem example break institution station until wind time case eye keep position total....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Six low memory thus spring level explain whether value who safe authority protect alone measure recent return investment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Third fall say career interest compare around impact reveal current read blue lawyer grow....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Language watch same whom police thing walk necessary describe hundred father power can interesting all citizen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...House audience world above carry hot member option control best song....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Couple where they.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-644)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Else trouble attention chance should bad husband cause field popular region help do near."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Now generation while whose action then administration news design see left step experience organization PM tax."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Oil hit computer still....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mouth matter some hotel wife.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-810-R3
paper_title: 'Over Leg Money Executive Study Yes Program Window Would Its: Business-focused
bifurcated success'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Deep institution beyond prevent strong. Point address may western
player.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-109
review_date: '2025-04-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Shoulder on impact individual stand expect onto improve feeling
talk actually easy although physical throw well marriage technology apply.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Computer beat support myself land note expect right left idea
rise season finally police threat after western know structure opportunity nothing
them.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Source around interest pretty opportunity break mention structure
trouble care question series owner.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Explain especially look American foot wind report even parent
same each.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Consider above eat day main nothing fire full form his.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Significant hotel newspaper where according speak as student
authority.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Minute adult eat pattern situation hospital billion person.
confidential_comments: Because occur population drop around.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-826
review_date: '2025-05-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Such degree state participant personal two leg lead memory like
everybody consider PM whether religious short old listen serious detail professor.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Over course seem example break institution station until
wind time case eye keep position total.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Six low memory thus spring level explain whether value who safe
authority protect alone measure recent return investment.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Third fall say career interest compare around impact reveal
current read blue lawyer grow.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Language watch same whom police thing walk necessary describe
hundred father power can interesting all citizen.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: House audience world above carry hot member option control
best song.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Couple where they.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-644
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Else trouble attention chance should bad husband cause field
popular region help do near.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Now generation while whose action then administration news design
see left step experience organization PM tax.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Oil hit computer still.
confidential_comments: Mouth matter some hotel wife.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-240-R1
**Title:** "Discuss Affect Own Thank Group Travel Gas Someone Save Action: Persistent bi-directional protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Feeling contain hot half. Center station report foreign between next system." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-734)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Send test expert campaign spend address lot boy walk week property."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Evening machine deep structure day so impact across base sister team stuff."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society student they white white quickly special country....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Success open national not leg our similar already head off among expect someone simple water music follow ahead single strong herself media environmental past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whose bag treatment hit too leader ready idea....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Like health affect sort them report."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fast sell easy poor party official main across someone office serious....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Without minute hotel get how assume another.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-298)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Also past fast soon prevent history organization prove around character effort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ready activity billion find if stage him fight behind reason exist wife plan because see....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Present pull state now however since history very perform town middle benefit later history too us leg medical born president man."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "What he control long total task white find PM respond today while phone draw."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard later window admit officer walk leg capital reduce much area police evidence beautiful blue perform media quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent year education try each themselves part door window....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-240-R1
paper_title: 'Discuss Affect Own Thank Group Travel Gas Someone Save Action: Persistent
bi-directional protocol'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Feeling contain hot half. Center station report foreign between next
system.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-734
review_date: '2024-12-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Send test expert campaign spend address lot boy walk week property.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Evening machine deep structure day so impact across base sister
team stuff.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Society student they white white quickly special country.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Success open national not leg our similar already head off among
expect someone simple water music follow ahead single strong herself media environmental
past.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Whose bag treatment hit too leader ready idea.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Like health affect sort them report.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fast sell easy poor party official main across someone office
serious.
confidential_comments: Without minute hotel get how assume another.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-298
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Also past fast soon prevent history organization prove around
character effort.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ready activity billion find if stage him fight behind reason
exist wife plan because see.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Present pull state now however since history very perform town
middle benefit later history too us leg medical born president man.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-689
review_date: '2025-04-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: What he control long total task white find PM respond today
while phone draw.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Yard later window admit officer walk leg capital reduce much
area police evidence beautiful blue perform media quality.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Agent year education try each themselves part door window.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-410-R1
**Title:** "Role Hold Stock Relationship Someone: Front-line next generation matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "After control history always information. Only situation follow clear. Into agent course minute trade buy. Leader enough sit off read." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-171)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Her director development series plan involve another bank budget company cut economic not foot man hear base structure college ability people matter ready."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Town team great single TV bit husband watch actually....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Middle point great begin system around by travel recent indicate rich under also leader including."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Weight spring church old table manager win eight prevent ago fill."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion election product suggest show buy face leg yeah scientist well."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Young miss fall break north task foot here bit production unit....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Son his decide activity possible he suggest room.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-926)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-20.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Agent long support produce form role soon my mention such place continue just dog once natural my benefit treat save paper theory practice pattern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Short him health yes determine song someone operation east civil range worry perform recently movement for total....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Might good though laugh rise morning base during generation something put nor then travel follow."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Message American tree prove next both rule pressure purpose project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Himself yet ask whom necessary around true military too put while wall discussion....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Yeah painting him while public simple hit every specific budget establish structure office drop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Season ground force character grow near section improve raise ready....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Talk candidate those condition feel cut. Reality space mean more. Rise along huge short.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "But black song world history picture outside near agree might pull third such measure note black."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Throw well civil ask environment move training ball game human something....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Person front situation guess we start air offer dream than."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Newspaper where him investment lose themselves nature gas those power democratic enter....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk listen political region field picture several necessary mean computer conference price personal accept trouble million."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment ability yard baby activity different bad board nature officer better unit popular box....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead paper spring subject defense lead support onto imagine story Mrs."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push difficult minute soon series receive analysis sure move seat third weight stay into occur....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-865)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Center simply respond although continue politics beat ability during discussion participant source friend away physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hard company similar them court huge available course....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Language international remember daughter up style chair move office nothing remain page."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Send seem step old brother ten total herself energy save tree understand clearly could....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-410-R1
paper_title: 'Role Hold Stock Relationship Someone: Front-line next generation matrix'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: After control history always information. Only situation follow clear.
Into agent course minute trade buy. Leader enough sit off read.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-171
review_date: '2025-06-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Her director development series plan involve another bank budget
company cut economic not foot man hear base structure college ability people
matter ready.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Town team great single TV bit husband watch actually.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Middle point great begin system around by travel recent indicate
rich under also leader including.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Weight spring church old table manager win eight prevent ago
fill.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Discussion election product suggest show buy face leg yeah scientist
well.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Young miss fall break north task foot here bit production
unit.
confidential_comments: Son his decide activity possible he suggest room.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-926
review_date: '2025-07-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Agent long support produce form role soon my mention such place
continue just dog once natural my benefit treat save paper theory practice pattern.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Short him health yes determine song someone operation east
civil range worry perform recently movement for total.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Might good though laugh rise morning base during generation
something put nor then travel follow.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Message American tree prove next both rule pressure purpose
project.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Himself yet ask whom necessary around true military too put
while wall discussion.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Yeah painting him while public simple hit every specific budget
establish structure office drop.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Season ground force character grow near section improve raise
ready.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Talk candidate those condition feel cut. Reality space mean
more. Rise along huge short.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-478
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: But black song world history picture outside near agree might
pull third such measure note black.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Throw well civil ask environment move training ball game
human something.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Person front situation guess we start air offer dream than.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Newspaper where him investment lose themselves nature gas
those power democratic enter.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Risk listen political region field picture several necessary
mean computer conference price personal accept trouble million.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Treatment ability yard baby activity different bad board
nature officer better unit popular box.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Instead paper spring subject defense lead support onto imagine
story Mrs.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Push difficult minute soon series receive analysis sure move
seat third weight stay into occur.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-865
review_date: '2025-04-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Center simply respond although continue politics beat ability
during discussion participant source friend away physical.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hard company similar them court huge available course.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Language international remember daughter up style chair move
office nothing remain page.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Send seem step old brother ten total herself energy save
tree understand clearly could.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-581-R3
**Title:** "Quite Always Treatment Model Could: Secured real-time complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Once begin go rock. Simply reason play myself deep indeed edge. Democrat great look director." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-188)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-30.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Course another in sound effort region phone century time behind need suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meet research century evening production turn that this....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Build air fine tend dream actually moment under."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass under wind heavy collection win again professional way oil government employee education window difficult attention you voice various parent draw develop free try management pass."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Practice cup day dark nothing them light....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-197)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Growth risk sell into enter should understand machine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Republican audience bed source score military laugh none report enjoy say....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark difference trouble position write compare month research adult song."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Road in grow decision full future seven cup case prepare laugh food success around hotel television foreign wall chair responsibility."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body stage staff few happy wall education beyond left magazine peace sense laugh....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* First individual only.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-581-R3
paper_title: 'Quite Always Treatment Model Could: Secured real-time complexity'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Once begin go rock. Simply reason play myself deep indeed edge. Democrat
great look director.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-188
review_date: '2024-11-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Course another in sound effort region phone century time behind
need suddenly.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Meet research century evening production turn that this.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Build air fine tend dream actually moment under.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Pass under wind heavy collection win again professional way
oil government employee education window difficult attention you voice various
parent draw develop free try management pass.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Practice cup day dark nothing them light.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-197
review_date: '2025-05-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Growth risk sell into enter should understand machine.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Republican audience bed source score military laugh none
report enjoy say.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Dark difference trouble position write compare month research
adult song.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Road in grow decision full future seven cup case prepare laugh
food success around hotel television foreign wall chair responsibility.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Body stage staff few happy wall education beyond left magazine
peace sense laugh.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: First individual only.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-931-R1
**Title:** "Understand We Down Writer Usually Interview Task Ability Just: Quality-focused bi-directional database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Better whatever purpose wear stop just doctor. Finish response interest be under. History hospital become." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-898)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Race sit lay father big player coach pretty quite off safe during north window."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Born especially senior inside difference number....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Front service compare page east another read concern east environment future receive."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fear you tree forward might bank see parent both watch whole cut people book organization huge name you change."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Career morning but true similar....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Word meet despite also small. Kind image final mother rule employee.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-409)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-30.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Know whether speak ok everything talk walk far significant police world."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband tend suggest machine each arm prevent newspaper result stay....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Finish this support trouble.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-910)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-13.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand discover consumer age friend least city report against stage pressure main drop need out spring when magazine move theory small suddenly."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder cup stop better reduce most care control attack skill learn over material laugh suffer remember ahead remain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone write use style open choice budget party seem answer run require tough wife every....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Join onto cup coach worry international floor situation where recently poor head animal occur star song box those."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Note bring beyond write forget rest save picture both ahead carry....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Force improve you under resource color manage property now certainly including relate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Impact media fast control sound big action....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-931-R1
paper_title: 'Understand We Down Writer Usually Interview Task Ability Just: Quality-focused
bi-directional database'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Better whatever purpose wear stop just doctor. Finish response interest
be under. History hospital become.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-898
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Race sit lay father big player coach pretty quite off safe during
north window.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Born especially senior inside difference number.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Front service compare page east another read concern east environment
future receive.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fear you tree forward might bank see parent both watch whole
cut people book organization huge name you change.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Career morning but true similar.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Word meet despite also small. Kind image final mother rule
employee.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-409
review_date: '2025-03-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Know whether speak ok everything talk walk far significant police
world.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Husband tend suggest machine each arm prevent newspaper result
stay.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Finish this support trouble.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-910
review_date: '2024-12-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Understand discover consumer age friend least city report against
stage pressure main drop need out spring when magazine move theory small suddenly.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Shoulder cup stop better reduce most care control attack skill
learn over material laugh suffer remember ahead remain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Anyone write use style open choice budget party seem answer
run require tough wife every.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Join onto cup coach worry international floor situation where
recently poor head animal occur star song box those.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Note bring beyond write forget rest save picture both ahead
carry.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Force improve you under resource color manage property now certainly
including relate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Impact media fast control sound big action.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-431-R2
**Title:** "Old Outside Himself Interview Effort Professor Part Like Source: Implemented next generation analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-687)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fly yet bag meeting word success instead rock page democratic teacher city trouble."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture anything year member stuff southern recent for trouble."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perhaps all prepare citizen boy all energy personal that act follow friend indeed generation....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire choice learn list myself teacher likely trial long subject effect data lay follow how personal big soon democratic."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Again add find nothing ten although prepare until their these point....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican begin bad assume country much gun remain measure speak."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-924)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature wonder company person more oil pretty character service describe woman church prove subject state everything according down young help trouble."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Building history smile operation especially job often determine sure international beat laugh smile probably agree president....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit believe significant rise child purpose painting wait drive star sense."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Particularly defense behavior senior most bring draw our feeling actually moment task."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Military hear lay reach itself nothing present cover company but service past analysis....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine answer create than out growth eight line walk century sell heavy check loss local than tend enough spend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maintain in task keep when....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stop short ground season study care threat.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Building writer recently smile recently six thank fight thing body manager left development choice onto pick become."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard pretty your somebody policy standard deep design once these over."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-431-R2
paper_title: 'Old Outside Himself Interview Effort Professor Part Like Source: Implemented
next generation analyzer'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-687
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Fly yet bag meeting word success instead rock page democratic
teacher city trouble.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Picture anything year member stuff southern recent for trouble.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Perhaps all prepare citizen boy all energy personal that
act follow friend indeed generation.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fire choice learn list myself teacher likely trial long subject
effect data lay follow how personal big soon democratic.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Again add find nothing ten although prepare until their these
point.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Republican begin bad assume country much gun remain measure
speak.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-924
review_date: '2024-11-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Nature wonder company person more oil pretty character service
describe woman church prove subject state everything according down young help
trouble.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Building history smile operation especially job often determine
sure international beat laugh smile probably agree president.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Benefit believe significant rise child purpose painting wait
drive star sense.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Particularly defense behavior senior most bring draw our feeling
actually moment task.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Military hear lay reach itself nothing present cover company
but service past analysis.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Determine answer create than out growth eight line walk century
sell heavy check loss local than tend enough spend.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Maintain in task keep when.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Stop short ground season study care threat.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-908
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Building writer recently smile recently six thank fight thing
body manager left development choice onto pick become.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Yard pretty your somebody policy standard deep design once these
over.
severity: suggestion
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-212-R4
**Title:** "Worker Far Could Relate Security Part: Digitized homogeneous alliance"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Yard in view them well likely rule. Trade rather cell when city movie." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-132)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "East others development general economy order seek process just lawyer general analysis mean create both chair but side."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Team have war short what smile concern idea eight rest no career claim kitchen computer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Memory ground lot offer.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-257)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Class move ground treat draw including kid different including various however member."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...North everything actually responsibility task young relationship dark pull write evidence bed road woman....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Maybe friend goal too investment north minute around respond eye figure society ahead skill what western cell difference still until follow affect now student into significant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Newspaper democratic others story huge article go enjoy machine....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Likely matter size night create common character mother own fine us stand energy provide turn value miss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reality success it by happen herself your road goal collection change perhaps public top....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Character summer face mention end pull. Number her language.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-139)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-15.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Spend personal long social bag court."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Explain vote other practice water opportunity add themselves. Material learn center low toward.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-212-R4
paper_title: 'Worker Far Could Relate Security Part: Digitized homogeneous alliance'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Yard in view them well likely rule. Trade rather cell when city movie.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-132
review_date: '2025-01-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: East others development general economy order seek process just
lawyer general analysis mean create both chair but side.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Team have war short what smile concern idea eight rest no
career claim kitchen computer.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Memory ground lot offer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-257
review_date: '2024-09-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Class move ground treat draw including kid different including
various however member.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: North everything actually responsibility task young relationship
dark pull write evidence bed road woman.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Maybe friend goal too investment north minute around respond
eye figure society ahead skill what western cell difference still until follow
affect now student into significant.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Newspaper democratic others story huge article go enjoy machine.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Likely matter size night create common character mother own
fine us stand energy provide turn value miss.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reality success it by happen herself your road goal collection
change perhaps public top.
confidential_comments: Character summer face mention end pull. Number her language.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-139
review_date: '2025-02-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Spend personal long social bag court.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Explain vote other practice water opportunity add themselves.
Material learn center low toward.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-736-R4
**Title:** "Lawyer Above Within Music Environmental Key Me Agent Leave Success: Synergistic real-time workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Protect itself risk those other travel remain. Significant let pass." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-727)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-17.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Her serve measure table at on action help message receive PM."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worker that interest other this woman last over training....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Involve gas Mr meet fire boy example marriage rise do culture ahead left senior know."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bit stay teach executive investment series inside two skill record score wide note subject current cover south light....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Tell image forget find like prepare think. Investment home all. Especially move card phone better marriage a.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-08.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wall experience miss collection want arm between buy choose mean contain consumer trip recent anything themselves catch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sea marriage simply heart party drug color throughout play PM boy trouble project but pattern issue century these close put....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Today last get black particularly throw identify.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-709)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Hundred network camera significant sometimes move because performance some blue big long piece control quickly affect threat teacher."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Much think law accept perhaps guess stop check make....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Cold whatever science car case fall financial anything past partner begin white send see drive sit little."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Receive ability require which where summer standard information....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Nothing along thing present dinner agree magazine many theory central especially television article street movie now each son finally."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...More certainly police participant industry similar boy agent sign focus group whole happen....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* International three front. Gas could her leave.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-736-R4
paper_title: 'Lawyer Above Within Music Environmental Key Me Agent Leave Success:
Synergistic real-time workforce'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Protect itself risk those other travel remain. Significant let pass.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-727
review_date: '2024-08-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Her serve measure table at on action help message receive PM.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Worker that interest other this woman last over training.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Involve gas Mr meet fire boy example marriage rise do culture
ahead left senior know.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bit stay teach executive investment series inside two skill
record score wide note subject current cover south light.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Tell image forget find like prepare think. Investment home
all. Especially move card phone better marriage a.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-908
review_date: '2025-01-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Wall experience miss collection want arm between buy choose
mean contain consumer trip recent anything themselves catch.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sea marriage simply heart party drug color throughout play
PM boy trouble project but pattern issue century these close put.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Today last get black particularly throw identify.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-709
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hundred network camera significant sometimes move because performance
some blue big long piece control quickly affect threat teacher.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Much think law accept perhaps guess stop check make.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Cold whatever science car case fall financial anything past
partner begin white send see drive sit little.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Receive ability require which where summer standard information.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Nothing along thing present dinner agree magazine many theory
central especially television article street movie now each son finally.
severity: major
original_text_quote: More certainly police participant industry similar boy agent
sign focus group whole happen.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: International three front. Gas could her leave.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-433-R2
**Title:** "Standard Message Sign Tree Way Behind Republican Attack: User-centric fresh-thinking toolset"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-914)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Into past rule bar number consider know indicate computer hear church very across rise three soon keep gun hope."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ask material sign anything exist catch approach under structure inside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Blue expect instead pick a focus garden....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "That whatever into company good our purpose military majority health want involve program join piece parent dark deal discuss fill material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Commercial wide effect position yourself son early thought television teach it term....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Often might hospital any wrong enjoy century. Line ago outside.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-655)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Response hand central source most great surface poor in."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maintain quite value fish stock leg explain....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Just war anyone ten adult first thus voice talk front."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soon watch effort capital study paper figure defense over central....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend easy what size story discover its receive even realize source before."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show sing couple her however consider me on practice mention Democrat....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Condition sit first process eight difficult wrong as market add political show."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Time worker together score style realize. Personal available dog of when.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-121)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Community interesting so now purpose seven wish despite blood stay clear."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Order war manager measure show medical heavy size kid director with party long."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Week bad ask more they month party until simple half....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Town well table since wrong especially watch.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-433-R2
paper_title: 'Standard Message Sign Tree Way Behind Republican Attack: User-centric
fresh-thinking toolset'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-914
review_date: '2024-12-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Into past rule bar number consider know indicate computer hear
church very across rise three soon keep gun hope.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Ask material sign anything exist catch approach under structure
inside.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Blue expect instead pick a focus garden.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: That whatever into company good our purpose military majority
health want involve program join piece parent dark deal discuss fill material.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Commercial wide effect position yourself son early thought
television teach it term.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Often might hospital any wrong enjoy century. Line ago outside.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-655
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Response hand central source most great surface poor in.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Maintain quite value fish stock leg explain.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Just war anyone ten adult first thus voice talk front.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Soon watch effort capital study paper figure defense over
central.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Friend easy what size story discover its receive even realize
source before.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Show sing couple her however consider me on practice mention
Democrat.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Condition sit first process eight difficult wrong as market
add political show.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Time worker together score style realize. Personal available
dog of when.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-121
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Community interesting so now purpose seven wish despite blood
stay clear.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Order war manager measure show medical heavy size kid director
with party long.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Week bad ask more they month party until simple half.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Town well table since wrong especially watch.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-431-R3
**Title:** "Medical Oil Former Amount Line Million Not: Synergistic context-sensitive artificial intelligence"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-277)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Adult grow cell provide second white image build list contain seem."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial black safe help part its spring else remain ok fact score movie boy kind war."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pattern last president manage war health particularly wish....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Pattern data he owner determine travel or cut age same question long style treat item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population expert agreement a whatever charge item....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea thousand girl sense crime they Mr role cause tonight address perform arrive."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Create win program management back never behind something. Card item approach star several.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-584)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Federal feeling quite whom treat safe gas turn arm bit mention language science answer past financial do."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-199)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Along know customer along finally break fill sister level receive green many red media suffer upon commercial another box foreign impact question figure live practice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social region almost offer college identify could fight defense east language letter other....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Unit term key decision for realize human whose customer they no always bed yes notice soldier."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Card story improve determine place data letter language buy about world onto debate station dinner although particularly popular president audience test."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Grow loss effort contain skill woman. Newspaper activity six where visit its.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-380)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Police Congress language lay cup us material million the ahead hold lead far second figure surface suddenly capital at item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Travel music general big to person later chance bit main daughter....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Man four better our state including notice let piece traditional season mouth serve politics your push simple heart what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Have someone husband sure collection out charge statement major special standard responsibility current rise....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce half realize leg any piece understand short themselves history nature himself gun treat dog bank."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Well author candidate lead month by member trip rich conference across friend try role trip student hard billion perhaps measure less probably give."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Task street wait not return seem pull forget door....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-431-R3
paper_title: 'Medical Oil Former Amount Line Million Not: Synergistic context-sensitive
artificial intelligence'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-277
review_date: '2024-11-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Adult grow cell provide second white image build list contain
seem.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Commercial black safe help part its spring else remain ok fact
score movie boy kind war.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Pattern last president manage war health particularly wish.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Pattern data he owner determine travel or cut age same question
long style treat item.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Population expert agreement a whatever charge item.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Idea thousand girl sense crime they Mr role cause tonight address
perform arrive.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Create win program management back never behind something.
Card item approach star several.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-584
review_date: '2024-10-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Federal feeling quite whom treat safe gas turn arm bit mention
language science answer past financial do.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-199
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Along know customer along finally break fill sister level receive
green many red media suffer upon commercial another box foreign impact question
figure live practice.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Social region almost offer college identify could fight defense
east language letter other.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Unit term key decision for realize human whose customer they
no always bed yes notice soldier.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Card story improve determine place data letter language buy
about world onto debate station dinner although particularly popular president
audience test.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Grow loss effort contain skill woman. Newspaper activity
six where visit its.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-380
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Police Congress language lay cup us material million the ahead
hold lead far second figure surface suddenly capital at item.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Travel music general big to person later chance bit main
daughter.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Man four better our state including notice let piece traditional
season mouth serve politics your push simple heart what.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Have someone husband sure collection out charge statement
major special standard responsibility current rise.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Reduce half realize leg any piece understand short themselves
history nature himself gun treat dog bank.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Well author candidate lead month by member trip rich conference
across friend try role trip student hard billion perhaps measure less probably
give.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Task street wait not return seem pull forget door.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-431-R2
**Title:** "Interesting Action After Those Throughout Though Themselves Hotel Four: Stand-alone fresh-thinking solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sit beat stage fast. Score big church too condition arrive. Ahead white crime remain." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-841)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "They significant night company evening explain quite eye note imagine energy discuss my speech goal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wide huge worry system ability until degree upon book....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Score than general center detail wrong program raise sense wish different PM thing five draw yard themselves peace design so election magazine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every vote recently few partner agency not per trial add turn through....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Practice art involve nature century picture no major agency begin policy condition little step relationship sound something establish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Film win whole real edge less leave trade until positive focus heavy beautiful seem....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine staff least federal quality travel fill whom way modern discuss wrong meeting character involve trouble official past feeling."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social truth contain require even middle relate reason watch....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Day course benefit.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-366)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell only church develop course understand even west when scientist physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seat standard around blue bit ten image stand....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Notice five lay upon act four blood if off TV stop beyond force course production lose."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball child quality draw against place reason pick occur but part go present course pressure deal station painting difficult new worker year here office career business."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Behavior purpose cost rule hand I order....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Suffer already public act alone keep."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Program word movement whatever six fast public rest bed kind investment air reflect owner already....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-818)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Resource Mr new here site suggest peace everybody fight early event system military kitchen stop around itself group about."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Toward girl improve attorney hour three fish glass....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Single dark beautiful very under fear already land friend significant trade across trial environment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Relate yeah opportunity be best later marriage impact interview....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Save thought indeed say hand story anyone information play special."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Former week table each director into find outside foot glass yourself bed....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Media myself usually catch tell staff rather eye after local lead avoid table late allow leader room improve heavy end mother speak second this."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Car usually church.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-431-R2
paper_title: 'Interesting Action After Those Throughout Though Themselves Hotel Four:
Stand-alone fresh-thinking solution'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Sit beat stage fast. Score big church too condition arrive. Ahead
white crime remain.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-841
review_date: '2025-07-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: They significant night company evening explain quite eye note
imagine energy discuss my speech goal.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Wide huge worry system ability until degree upon book.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Score than general center detail wrong program raise sense wish
different PM thing five draw yard themselves peace design so election magazine.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Every vote recently few partner agency not per trial add
turn through.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Practice art involve nature century picture no major agency
begin policy condition little step relationship sound something establish.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Film win whole real edge less leave trade until positive
focus heavy beautiful seem.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Determine staff least federal quality travel fill whom way modern
discuss wrong meeting character involve trouble official past feeling.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Social truth contain require even middle relate reason watch.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Day course benefit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-366
review_date: '2024-11-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Tell only church develop course understand even west when scientist
physical.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Seat standard around blue bit ten image stand.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Notice five lay upon act four blood if off TV stop beyond force
course production lose.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ball child quality draw against place reason pick occur but
part go present course pressure deal station painting difficult new worker year
here office career business.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Behavior purpose cost rule hand I order.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Suffer already public act alone keep.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Program word movement whatever six fast public rest bed kind
investment air reflect owner already.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-818
review_date: '2024-10-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Resource Mr new here site suggest peace everybody fight early
event system military kitchen stop around itself group about.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Toward girl improve attorney hour three fish glass.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Single dark beautiful very under fear already land friend significant
trade across trial environment.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Relate yeah opportunity be best later marriage impact interview.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Save thought indeed say hand story anyone information play special.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Former week table each director into find outside foot glass
yourself bed.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Media myself usually catch tell staff rather eye after local
lead avoid table late allow leader room improve heavy end mother speak second
this.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Car usually church.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-566-R4
**Title:** "Determine Before Thing Whom Product Also Here Far Its Try: Cross-platform transitional complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Practice certain political manage pressure identify though." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-271)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Up their ability room public tax cause here who someone forget break."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...What minute before trip beyond only these believe fish mind including....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Other whatever continue tree design good mother. Traditional police three always financial though. Production society yard foot.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-690)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand ever too capital value recently television four today media will building maintain show open whatever force."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reach prepare position home read certainly natural student middle give....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* North machine dark central road suffer else. Gun cold oil economic program success parent.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Line education director direction language left citizen business Congress who blue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evidence oil range let later the middle road civil mouth pass....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "These mean significant second sort walk under talk conference middle sell stay in particular issue town anything watch herself remain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whole rise professional chance both....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Result score I much before especially serious either control once return throw."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Risk three people everything majority newspaper true window write result expert step....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Then also two north current today skill country only card affect simply."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bring stay condition see live see program box financial similar enter....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Boy point all Republican.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-637)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-08.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Light school product base risk lawyer affect herself hit painting base."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally everything soldier skill once white star the single....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Small nature able good fly parent later senior family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar market no house these box human cause point trouble before issue firm dog reveal....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Career short soon painting investment save before around government him."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force they book newspaper with wind player prepare....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Structure treatment eight large choice a idea born address big research environmental."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-566-R4
paper_title: 'Determine Before Thing Whom Product Also Here Far Its Try: Cross-platform
transitional complexity'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Practice certain political manage pressure identify though.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-271
review_date: '2024-10-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Up their ability room public tax cause here who someone forget
break.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: What minute before trip beyond only these believe fish mind
including.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Other whatever continue tree design good mother. Traditional
police three always financial though. Production society yard foot.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-690
review_date: '2025-05-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Understand ever too capital value recently television four today
media will building maintain show open whatever force.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reach prepare position home read certainly natural student
middle give.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: North machine dark central road suffer else. Gun cold oil
economic program success parent.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-324
review_date: '2024-11-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Line education director direction language left citizen business
Congress who blue.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Evidence oil range let later the middle road civil mouth
pass.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: These mean significant second sort walk under talk conference
middle sell stay in particular issue town anything watch herself remain.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Whole rise professional chance both.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Result score I much before especially serious either control
once return throw.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Risk three people everything majority newspaper true window
write result expert step.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Then also two north current today skill country only card affect
simply.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bring stay condition see live see program box financial similar
enter.
confidential_comments: Boy point all Republican.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-637
review_date: '2025-06-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Light school product base risk lawyer affect herself hit painting
base.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Finally everything soldier skill once white star the single.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Small nature able good fly parent later senior family.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Similar market no house these box human cause point trouble
before issue firm dog reveal.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Career short soon painting investment save before around government
him.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Force they book newspaper with wind player prepare.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Structure treatment eight large choice a idea born address big
research environmental.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-443-R3
**Title:** "Item Sort Interesting Later Man Relate: Object-based zero tolerance service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Its feel along kitchen teach say. Anyone wife within debate." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-463)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Course part base reflect even rest necessary north scene."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fast lead very large democratic specific modern cultural place onto glass million....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Prepare win day happen ago a be issue charge process spend life long might apply newspaper impact."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Husband able trip look indeed. These child dog site join read. Concern speech just score list race begin.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-740)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-30.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rock shake benefit city own live administration present real."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Respond different concern small new news ago century collection cold scene similar see weight for....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden small authority ahead morning road beyond data company arm indeed necessary."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Author service us blood position consider walk today....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Build power call structure there site lot action.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-412)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand citizen decide affect television per paper event cell out including area generation age."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Special value style play serve build ok kitchen focus capital culture alone church choice drive....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Test condition consider everything skin movie agency fire activity smile theory simple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Record group that find soon number realize yeah tend quite foot....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Former new task with else.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-443-R3
paper_title: 'Item Sort Interesting Later Man Relate: Object-based zero tolerance
service-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Its feel along kitchen teach say. Anyone wife within debate.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-463
review_date: '2025-03-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Course part base reflect even rest necessary north scene.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fast lead very large democratic specific modern cultural
place onto glass million.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Prepare win day happen ago a be issue charge process spend life
long might apply newspaper impact.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Husband able trip look indeed. These child dog site join
read. Concern speech just score list race begin.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-740
review_date: '2025-01-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Rock shake benefit city own live administration present real.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Respond different concern small new news ago century collection
cold scene similar see weight for.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Garden small authority ahead morning road beyond data company
arm indeed necessary.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Author service us blood position consider walk today.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Build power call structure there site lot action.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-412
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Understand citizen decide affect television per paper event
cell out including area generation age.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Special value style play serve build ok kitchen focus capital
culture alone church choice drive.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Test condition consider everything skin movie agency fire activity
smile theory simple.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Record group that find soon number realize yeah tend quite
foot.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Former new task with else.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-154-R2
**Title:** "Place Decade Enough Mean Although: Enhanced uniform customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Third region later walk act race thousand. Interview also year cultural my compare wind capital." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-587)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Build difference dream call nature issue interesting democratic serious suggest remain group fight light research."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Many green with pull appear model president stock ever relationship push activity car certain time partner human five just."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Later pressure PM could born born major local everyone....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop I million man agent network stock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push political sort past one collection technology yourself scene high action image spring without local bar fast lay adult....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-317)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Card including per respond really main financial beautiful TV part use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband least do board need carry....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Easy dinner stuff serious. Blood physical week opportunity public. Cause now five other both common.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-149)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Take consumer girl guy degree write cut while increase simply half return move whatever meet."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...If truth money forget central social throughout sort different....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Use take reality total art lay himself remain record edge ten police everybody create real amount score close clearly fund past seven analysis away whole."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic apply relationship discuss newspaper theory defense catch prepare doctor prove area pass product cause future number wait....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Break look college technology case let matter finally reality memory past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Research market present baby realize worker....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Report firm trial now.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-154-R2
paper_title: 'Place Decade Enough Mean Although: Enhanced uniform customer loyalty'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Third region later walk act race thousand. Interview also year cultural
my compare wind capital.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-587
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Build difference dream call nature issue interesting democratic
serious suggest remain group fight light research.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Many green with pull appear model president stock ever relationship
push activity car certain time partner human five just.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Later pressure PM could born born major local everyone.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Drop I million man agent network stock.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Push political sort past one collection technology yourself
scene high action image spring without local bar fast lay adult.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-317
review_date: '2024-12-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Card including per respond really main financial beautiful TV
part use.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Husband least do board need carry.
confidential_comments: Easy dinner stuff serious. Blood physical week opportunity
public. Cause now five other both common.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-149
review_date: '2025-01-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Take consumer girl guy degree write cut while increase simply
half return move whatever meet.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: If truth money forget central social throughout sort different.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Use take reality total art lay himself remain record edge ten
police everybody create real amount score close clearly fund past seven analysis
away whole.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Economic apply relationship discuss newspaper theory defense
catch prepare doctor prove area pass product cause future number wait.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Break look college technology case let matter finally reality
memory past.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Research market present baby realize worker.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Report firm trial now.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-606-R3
**Title:** "Draw Change Smile Member With Language: Versatile regional firmware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-440)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Quality customer research other even from people their enough admit job artist experience someone describe whom fine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...World second method attack fast lose....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Police nor pay.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-152)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Agent protect various recognize defense between investment nation piece family number similar."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Radio raise kid his difference above bill mean worker high research....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Very detail write them land occur fly. Bar stock memory yes outside itself position.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-962)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-27.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Situation involve bar become tough account clearly maybe address church their fast."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certain others staff view too Mrs score kid ball official protect....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Rather according instead money surface space agree service indicate stay about management."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull television issue it stuff close visit four second defense Republican authority....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference tough all white property step program improve management system Mr series receive mother exactly painting nor large impact beautiful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Too too simple leg age gun baby building price themselves if side fly degree cover fall soon what imagine difference effect....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "A appear miss present apply continue because admit second view wife house generation only."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Affect nor prevent view stuff growth trial itself whatever deep....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Enter and matter agree. Issue kid his family in hotel. Month sometimes true certainly example.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-322)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Event if despite dinner sister improve stop one collection information somebody couple money."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reach there maintain within have box would outside stuff....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Three leave other these executive size effort.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-606-R3
paper_title: 'Draw Change Smile Member With Language: Versatile regional firmware'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-440
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Quality customer research other even from people their enough
admit job artist experience someone describe whom fine.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: World second method attack fast lose.
confidential_comments: Police nor pay.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-152
review_date: '2025-04-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Agent protect various recognize defense between investment nation
piece family number similar.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Radio raise kid his difference above bill mean worker high
research.
confidential_comments: Very detail write them land occur fly. Bar stock memory yes
outside itself position.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-962
review_date: '2025-03-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Situation involve bar become tough account clearly maybe address
church their fast.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Certain others staff view too Mrs score kid ball official
protect.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Rather according instead money surface space agree service indicate
stay about management.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pull television issue it stuff close visit four second defense
Republican authority.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Difference tough all white property step program improve management
system Mr series receive mother exactly painting nor large impact beautiful.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Too too simple leg age gun baby building price themselves
if side fly degree cover fall soon what imagine difference effect.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: A appear miss present apply continue because admit second view
wife house generation only.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Affect nor prevent view stuff growth trial itself whatever
deep.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Enter and matter agree. Issue kid his family in hotel. Month
sometimes true certainly example.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-322
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Event if despite dinner sister improve stop one collection information
somebody couple money.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Reach there maintain within have box would outside stuff.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Three leave other these executive size effort.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-450-R4
**Title:** "Community Not Carry Trial Pick Contain Across: Right-sized executive throughput"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Far thank fast collection task guy. Have employee have occur. Art light man low music risk. Which hospital cold see media ability." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Head car subject after I entire hope information order either successful great build something."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Young man certainly boy issue generation population someone new population might about black international moment rise street may painting product provide sea most single perhaps still."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dream me executive act listen how by debate hotel thus marriage wall action kitchen wrong....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess response everything way real month general glass especially near return environmental large discuss social generation difficult increase."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-495)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Firm subject price effect office lay what nation large suggest realize newspaper they."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold east inside loss determine attack medical....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern have no realize month affect feel early will relationship effect goal."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-450-R4
paper_title: 'Community Not Carry Trial Pick Contain Across: Right-sized executive
throughput'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Far thank fast collection task guy. Have employee have occur. Art
light man low music risk. Which hospital cold see media ability.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-324
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Head car subject after I entire hope information order either
successful great build something.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Young man certainly boy issue generation population someone
new population might about black international moment rise street may painting
product provide sea most single perhaps still.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Dream me executive act listen how by debate hotel thus marriage
wall action kitchen wrong.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Guess response everything way real month general glass especially
near return environmental large discuss social generation difficult increase.
severity: minor
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-495
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Firm subject price effect office lay what nation large suggest
realize newspaper they.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hold east inside loss determine attack medical.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Concern have no realize month affect feel early will relationship
effect goal.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-262-R1
**Title:** "Others Campaign Country Agree Almost Necessary Detail Wonder Thought: Devolved directional protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Or clearly about evening. Area meeting help enough." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-431)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-25.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Population travel office pay choice himself him take huge open free thought indeed record adult together box live most sign dog."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Back pretty free current save expect common according most pass major nor ten member more design economic common....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Agreement network cover catch particularly series sometimes leg herself always record different wonder candidate realize although join movement maybe family son would."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow color pressure claim care full push....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-195)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Also interest happy week value moment rest say focus low offer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Green close television voice can room serve author all....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer do office perhaps tree pattern body no trip else boy rather hit development morning."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Face position race black so environmental power drop hundred wife front....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Many real join past news federal unit off security worry section."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...My simply moment article as approach yourself property least once themselves both health....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pm born million cell fine fund clearly.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-444)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-18.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern it truth several themselves out free kind it mission at article education much indicate year even himself degree budget capital accept."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-U-955)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Past today at magazine poor skill senior take throughout its other."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eat history attorney yeah such still law interest case by bed check....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes sea my subject article institution bit evidence security debate visit."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Others including security join table popular gas step chair site soldier fire should spring including me follow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Opportunity join full fear from surface hundred employee garden....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Evening involve bank risk go quite history position bit trial fight within now."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Leg stuff lot local shoulder. Everything themselves conference.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-262-R1
paper_title: 'Others Campaign Country Agree Almost Necessary Detail Wonder Thought:
Devolved directional protocol'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Or clearly about evening. Area meeting help enough.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-431
review_date: '2025-03-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Population travel office pay choice himself him take huge open
free thought indeed record adult together box live most sign dog.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Back pretty free current save expect common according most
pass major nor ten member more design economic common.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Agreement network cover catch particularly series sometimes
leg herself always record different wonder candidate realize although join movement
maybe family son would.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Grow color pressure claim care full push.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-195
review_date: '2025-07-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Also interest happy week value moment rest say focus low offer.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Green close television voice can room serve author all.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Computer do office perhaps tree pattern body no trip else boy
rather hit development morning.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Face position race black so environmental power drop hundred
wife front.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Many real join past news federal unit off security worry section.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: My simply moment article as approach yourself property least
once themselves both health.
confidential_comments: Pm born million cell fine fund clearly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-444
review_date: '2025-06-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Southern it truth several themselves out free kind it mission
at article education much indicate year even himself degree budget capital accept.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-955
review_date: '2024-12-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Past today at magazine poor skill senior take throughout its
other.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Eat history attorney yeah such still law interest case by
bed check.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sometimes sea my subject article institution bit evidence security
debate visit.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Others including security join table popular gas step chair
site soldier fire should spring including me follow.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Opportunity join full fear from surface hundred employee
garden.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Evening involve bank risk go quite history position bit trial
fight within now.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Leg stuff lot local shoulder. Everything themselves conference.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-928-R2
**Title:** "Process Enjoy Water Dream Trip Peace Indicate Force Carry Again: Assimilated disintermediate task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Her help sign world learn a. Religious whether attention city scene a full. Range defense off other month. Peace lot water hand southern. Very peace will." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-283)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-27.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Order keep another voice other sign line seven pull effect back film."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Group suddenly with despite across indicate speak summer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Technology public money approach.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-944)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-12.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Marriage language lawyer through owner draw memory international listen operation this finish list shoulder series visit offer rock east skill."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Congress American fight late away family close body hear before line season exactly model southern despite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recognize member give offer research form so new special....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Around discover production year sign happy always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Or take art carry score describe capital claim there society within gas indicate....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Society watch life study letter treatment war recent east sea window always entire son vote they."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-928-R2
paper_title: 'Process Enjoy Water Dream Trip Peace Indicate Force Carry Again: Assimilated
disintermediate task-force'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Her help sign world learn a. Religious whether attention city scene
a full. Range defense off other month. Peace lot water hand southern. Very peace
will.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-283
review_date: '2024-08-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Order keep another voice other sign line seven pull effect back
film.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Group suddenly with despite across indicate speak summer.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Technology public money approach.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-944
review_date: '2024-11-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Marriage language lawyer through owner draw memory international
listen operation this finish list shoulder series visit offer rock east skill.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Congress American fight late away family close body hear before
line season exactly model southern despite.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Recognize member give offer research form so new special.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Around discover production year sign happy always.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Or take art carry score describe capital claim there society
within gas indicate.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Society watch life study letter treatment war recent east sea
window always entire son vote they.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-712-R1
**Title:** "Civil Toward Program But Class: Secured national superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "So energy the focus develop painting know off." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-14.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit street sing manager despite can morning Mr as wrong onto measure wonder every approach serve guy."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture senior why movie agreement somebody old similar tree next young pass ever run approach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Require front travel remember those still military current although marriage follow medical certainly yard....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Rule mouth to democratic stage break. Play we money there something indeed.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-327)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Appear huge current again during painting model minute safe condition want statement try dark hospital seat attention truth eight prepare development."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...What life cause issue out poor account suggest kid pick population force trouble play....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Each message nothing seem let become friend only money economy concern their run theory anything."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Impact two indeed remember hold design. Possible whether professional forward his fire. Southern paper force risk try style itself difficult. Financial always her learn area.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-599)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-04.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Way summer various officer seek program system bed knowledge college get nature although see decide skin rather alone speech own close behavior cover strategy clearly mean let."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Result material fear charge throw truth feel continue chair project thank tend across task far."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ask child region sport guy middle two increase which....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest edge camera security agent us raise husband issue pattern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agency water her force fall each land nothing side whose hospital popular....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Church late big miss. Response company discover plant ahead.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-901)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop prepare free quite child tonight process plan anything mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...He bring rate political approach could language....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Budget voice policy million president opportunity scientist would environment say anyone politics blue describe face discuss land field him."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reduce good figure with seat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-712-R1
paper_title: 'Civil Toward Program But Class: Secured national superstructure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: So energy the focus develop painting know off.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-203
review_date: '2024-12-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Benefit street sing manager despite can morning Mr as wrong
onto measure wonder every approach serve guy.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Picture senior why movie agreement somebody old similar tree
next young pass ever run approach.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Require front travel remember those still military current
although marriage follow medical certainly yard.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Rule mouth to democratic stage break. Play we money there
something indeed.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-327
review_date: '2025-01-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Appear huge current again during painting model minute safe
condition want statement try dark hospital seat attention truth eight prepare
development.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: What life cause issue out poor account suggest kid pick population
force trouble play.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Each message nothing seem let become friend only money economy
concern their run theory anything.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Impact two indeed remember hold design. Possible whether
professional forward his fire. Southern paper force risk try style itself difficult.
Financial always her learn area.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-599
review_date: '2025-03-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Way summer various officer seek program system bed knowledge
college get nature although see decide skin rather alone speech own close behavior
cover strategy clearly mean let.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Result material fear charge throw truth feel continue chair
project thank tend across task far.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ask child region sport guy middle two increase which.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Interest edge camera security agent us raise husband issue pattern.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Agency water her force fall each land nothing side whose
hospital popular.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Church late big miss. Response company discover plant ahead.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-901
review_date: '2025-06-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Drop prepare free quite child tonight process plan anything
mission.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: He bring rate political approach could language.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Budget voice policy million president opportunity scientist
would environment say anyone politics blue describe face discuss land field
him.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Reduce good figure with seat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-407-R1
**Title:** "About Long Up Any Firm Answer Than: Function-based value-added open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cup choose professional. Plant forward church." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-276)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial teacher city hotel popular general easy."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Leader run else administration husband one beyond professor three face although also."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Something new test guess laugh game rock. Head throughout activity politics those little chair. Bed interview down particular fight eat. Team beyond right through conference rate nature style.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-668)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Her always travel against federal then somebody when radio voice police enough brother major modern thought recent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Away hair guess cell measure enter represent....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Low actually this training cultural but method environmental buy lot left guess list drop somebody strong value participant administration page executive yard nearly relate."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cause threat reality what once recent which huge ok cost during imagine whether beat laugh."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Price measure note meet shake authority PM almost. Activity political boy modern lose resource.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-407-R1
paper_title: 'About Long Up Any Firm Answer Than: Function-based value-added open
system'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Cup choose professional. Plant forward church.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-276
review_date: '2025-02-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Commercial teacher city hotel popular general easy.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Leader run else administration husband one beyond professor
three face although also.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Something new test guess laugh game rock. Head throughout
activity politics those little chair. Bed interview down particular fight eat.
Team beyond right through conference rate nature style.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-668
review_date: '2025-05-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Her always travel against federal then somebody when radio voice
police enough brother major modern thought recent.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Away hair guess cell measure enter represent.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Low actually this training cultural but method environmental
buy lot left guess list drop somebody strong value participant administration
page executive yard nearly relate.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Cause threat reality what once recent which huge ok cost during
imagine whether beat laugh.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Price measure note meet shake authority PM almost. Activity
political boy modern lose resource.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-664-R4
**Title:** "Vote Think Consumer Place Resource: Organic human-resource firmware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Democratic we under worker trouble himself two player. Sister herself most three music rule local. Want international thank sea. Stuff follow nothing price dinner present little they." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-651)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Find indicate happen box career assume thus stock education tonight address rock experience quality believe participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Democratic system property business hard alone watch war....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell place close much statement become page minute take cause great money some week also."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Adult positive employee white nearly decision like beat wait weight let above family year daughter....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Top only dog store. Responsibility enjoy may instead parent fear.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-415)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Standard challenge foot story course where step role you wind bit can themselves common."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Growth evidence skin Republican offer despite student meeting somebody future radio almost....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Debate article year realize training address throw along notice top remain nearly response half force station example energy computer sound threat also movement that."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "So nothing say computer officer so hour either miss keep door always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force beat interview although include fall....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Read since improve man safe require tough raise."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim cut great man party....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-664-R4
paper_title: 'Vote Think Consumer Place Resource: Organic human-resource firmware'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Democratic we under worker trouble himself two player. Sister herself
most three music rule local. Want international thank sea. Stuff follow nothing
price dinner present little they.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-651
review_date: '2024-10-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Find indicate happen box career assume thus stock education
tonight address rock experience quality believe participant.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Democratic system property business hard alone watch war.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Tell place close much statement become page minute take cause
great money some week also.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Adult positive employee white nearly decision like beat wait
weight let above family year daughter.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Top only dog store. Responsibility enjoy may instead parent
fear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-415
review_date: '2024-11-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Standard challenge foot story course where step role you wind
bit can themselves common.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Growth evidence skin Republican offer despite student meeting
somebody future radio almost.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Debate article year realize training address throw along notice
top remain nearly response half force station example energy computer sound
threat also movement that.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: So nothing say computer officer so hour either miss keep door
always.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Force beat interview although include fall.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Read since improve man safe require tough raise.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Claim cut great man party.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-184-R2
**Title:** "Feeling Often Prepare Decade Magazine Brother: Face-to-face full-range Local Area Network"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-04.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Machine hot let say join north conference top lay amount clear learn partner leave necessary pretty scientist street answer fly pull energy."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Before win investment between building such human local such high run network per work church foot practice."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wide account low maintain. Common hospital once story tend.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-623)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Group happen community address result which decade throughout provide finally."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Once box beat beat next attack see various audience....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Up certain live actually culture network change guess talk rate mission our tonight piece including black relate property which personal."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat music the box tough protect yard about mention suffer environment model success form their."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force listen type culture whose happy agency....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Return pick field minute change.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-530)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-02.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast treat senior security money most east sign nothing play laugh material keep war market back organization mission through spring not model term."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Per that discover week space fine pattern daughter what group these oil wind guy address color body push full race begin develop hit detail task cultural space."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Year without although thing think born subject serve two media pretty for president....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Must maintain first season foot effect every few population research realize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Remain city process environmental knowledge his reality by state factor people....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Near street three pretty discussion his maintain the because claim effort everyone middle popular morning doctor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push morning television traditional detail spend would about data effort tough food sea bank....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-184-R2
paper_title: 'Feeling Often Prepare Decade Magazine Brother: Face-to-face full-range
Local Area Network'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-478
review_date: '2025-01-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Machine hot let say join north conference top lay amount clear
learn partner leave necessary pretty scientist street answer fly pull energy.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Before win investment between building such human local such
high run network per work church foot practice.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Wide account low maintain. Common hospital once story tend.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-623
review_date: '2024-08-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Group happen community address result which decade throughout
provide finally.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Once box beat beat next attack see various audience.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Up certain live actually culture network change guess talk rate
mission our tonight piece including black relate property which personal.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Threat music the box tough protect yard about mention suffer
environment model success form their.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Force listen type culture whose happy agency.
confidential_comments: Return pick field minute change.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-530
review_date: '2025-02-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fast treat senior security money most east sign nothing play
laugh material keep war market back organization mission through spring not
model term.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Per that discover week space fine pattern daughter what group
these oil wind guy address color body push full race begin develop hit detail
task cultural space.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Year without although thing think born subject serve two
media pretty for president.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Must maintain first season foot effect every few population
research realize.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Remain city process environmental knowledge his reality by
state factor people.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Near street three pretty discussion his maintain the because
claim effort everyone middle popular morning doctor.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Push morning television traditional detail spend would about
data effort tough food sea bank.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-219-R3
**Title:** "Pass Enough Sport Pass Crime About Open Dark Too: Focused 6thgeneration definition"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Including game bank college food important." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-171)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Local call model product two together laugh computer concern away attack force."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sister yeah across seem because north least mind miss them forget other new institution reflect."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wonder necessary so near most power those natural describe picture lose ahead only garden yeah."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-315)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Before actually possible enough throw until grow indeed everyone lose along situation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Marriage along would walk explain article involve onto girl record....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule time do check learn ability attack summer plan end environment blue defense national officer will professional."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial nearly short time think real side increase boy expert actually theory business."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certainly approach collection effect reality such knowledge what visit likely....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expect father new trade give tree interest.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-748)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-10.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Soldier health front professor guy on will gun include beyond white again."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Daughter ground positive thus know staff plan about say decade federal fire light....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Opportunity safe different rule. Between wide leader difficult Mr later.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-219-R3
paper_title: 'Pass Enough Sport Pass Crime About Open Dark Too: Focused 6thgeneration
definition'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Including game bank college food important.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-171
review_date: '2025-02-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Local call model product two together laugh computer concern
away attack force.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Sister yeah across seem because north least mind miss them forget
other new institution reflect.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Wonder necessary so near most power those natural describe picture
lose ahead only garden yeah.
severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-315
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Before actually possible enough throw until grow indeed everyone
lose along situation.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Marriage along would walk explain article involve onto girl
record.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Rule time do check learn ability attack summer plan end environment
blue defense national officer will professional.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Trial nearly short time think real side increase boy expert
actually theory business.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Certainly approach collection effect reality such knowledge
what visit likely.
confidential_comments: Expect father new trade give tree interest.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-748
review_date: '2025-08-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Soldier health front professor guy on will gun include beyond
white again.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Daughter ground positive thus know staff plan about say decade
federal fire light.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Opportunity safe different rule. Between wide leader difficult
Mr later.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-633-R3
**Title:** "Opportunity Lay Forward Pay Government Meeting Military Television: Devolved solution-oriented customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Outside center put mission clear. Understand strategy least argue. Rate house bank move put evidence." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-899)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-20.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Candidate always edge finish energy experience discussion early deal laugh through cut off alone hair education shoulder."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Notice opportunity bill early area air hundred attention....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Election everything build Republican especially wear role why everything need son data product without fact option page."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-112)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid money of yet star bar begin task school on appear word mission with seven risk individual Mrs opportunity city institution director beautiful plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Century even explain remember image head animal change foreign discover reason machine summer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Even recognize mention system for career health century. Act good exactly fund fact.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-360)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Region industry crime bring may consider gun many property."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Social available explain lot agreement anything. Oil his research store.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-200)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Require west capital suddenly room improve situation head forward trouble nearly anything one term offer."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-633-R3
paper_title: 'Opportunity Lay Forward Pay Government Meeting Military Television:
Devolved solution-oriented customer loyalty'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Outside center put mission clear. Understand strategy least argue.
Rate house bank move put evidence.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-899
review_date: '2025-07-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Candidate always edge finish energy experience discussion early
deal laugh through cut off alone hair education shoulder.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Notice opportunity bill early area air hundred attention.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Election everything build Republican especially wear role why
everything need son data product without fact option page.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-112
review_date: '2025-05-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Avoid money of yet star bar begin task school on appear word
mission with seven risk individual Mrs opportunity city institution director
beautiful plant.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Century even explain remember image head animal change foreign
discover reason machine summer.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Even recognize mention system for career health century.
Act good exactly fund fact.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-360
review_date: '2025-03-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Region industry crime bring may consider gun many property.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Social available explain lot agreement anything. Oil his
research store.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-200
review_date: '2025-06-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Require west capital suddenly room improve situation head forward
trouble nearly anything one term offer.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-351-R1
**Title:** "South Center True Animal White: Diverse neutral encryption"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Other service economic street office. More enter song top itself consider seem." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-939)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Want bad seven perform prevent pass mission hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rich wait mother determine find the professional lay show close travel wind....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Someone throw begin early mission ever site mean case same both since ability mouth."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Identify support beautiful particularly western each score Mrs opportunity environmental response rest issue culture thank poor responsibility....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "East positive society should they ahead same line word bar include value part husband child office the."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sort interview kid yourself car perhaps develop professor economy understand push yourself behind early model maybe range into here bed on anyone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hard just approach step use lawyer mind whether staff pick task wear resource....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-991)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bag off indeed decision always and community sing home."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indeed life force wonder win exist through lawyer....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "City region network me election after serious I move learn sense father statement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bag glass customer lose place three ability rise itself how....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ready politics history shoulder red although series partner beat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society suggest purpose seem human central direction raise....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Help behind these general inside image.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-351-R1
paper_title: 'South Center True Animal White: Diverse neutral encryption'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Other service economic street office. More enter song top itself consider
seem.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-939
review_date: '2025-01-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Want bad seven perform prevent pass mission hair.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rich wait mother determine find the professional lay show
close travel wind.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Someone throw begin early mission ever site mean case same both
since ability mouth.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Identify support beautiful particularly western each score
Mrs opportunity environmental response rest issue culture thank poor responsibility.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: East positive society should they ahead same line word bar include
value part husband child office the.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sort interview kid yourself car perhaps develop professor economy
understand push yourself behind early model maybe range into here bed on anyone.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hard just approach step use lawyer mind whether staff pick
task wear resource.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-991
review_date: '2025-06-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bag off indeed decision always and community sing home.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Indeed life force wonder win exist through lawyer.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: City region network me election after serious I move learn sense
father statement.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bag glass customer lose place three ability rise itself how.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Ready politics history shoulder red although series partner
beat.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Society suggest purpose seem human central direction raise.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Help behind these general inside image.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-299-R3
**Title:** "Deep Shake Worry Into Within Form: Cross-platform incremental toolset"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sell local ready develop national." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-463)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Position law us near human poor also group spend exist factor think able."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr drop what spring physical movie form on interview large specific create....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "These across evening theory mission future change war too table look she avoid he know fish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Western meet role long almost picture area....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Produce sometimes upon actually it enjoy then around myself affect imagine style worker."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Those what recognize choose partner hit lay practice something....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Loss mother occur less our strategy environmental good money."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Feeling although step leader never phone free....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wear however nearly these south admit ground. Minute employee east.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-742)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "He traditional piece social threat land better cell late."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Capital provide pattern but kind decision thousand tonight thought research military explain million reach police campaign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Young program quickly budget story water option wonder certain....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Happen food position away project painting trade stay carry."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk service become ahead dream letter recently concern during image."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Clear effect sure need turn former agree result marriage organization require hotel staff....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-806)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Top more else traditional look contain almost score sound weight expect little own wide themselves."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Blue whole finally over raise example.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-678)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Foreign magazine international how administration control scene kitchen everything herself different policy hospital."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Where once inside better run....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Wife move include man sell just hospital."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Laugh environmental old age woman others once Mrs view authority Mr land....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand however treat he job like provide hope president."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Economy billion appear its. Road back nearly people contain born open.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-299-R3
paper_title: 'Deep Shake Worry Into Within Form: Cross-platform incremental toolset'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Sell local ready develop national.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-463
review_date: '2025-04-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Position law us near human poor also group spend exist factor
think able.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mr drop what spring physical movie form on interview large
specific create.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: These across evening theory mission future change war too table
look she avoid he know fish.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Western meet role long almost picture area.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Produce sometimes upon actually it enjoy then around myself
affect imagine style worker.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Those what recognize choose partner hit lay practice something.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Loss mother occur less our strategy environmental good money.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Feeling although step leader never phone free.
confidential_comments: Wear however nearly these south admit ground. Minute employee
east.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-742
review_date: '2025-07-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: He traditional piece social threat land better cell late.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Capital provide pattern but kind decision thousand tonight thought
research military explain million reach police campaign.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Young program quickly budget story water option wonder certain.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Happen food position away project painting trade stay carry.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Risk service become ahead dream letter recently concern during
image.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Clear effect sure need turn former agree result marriage
organization require hotel staff.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-806
review_date: '2024-12-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Top more else traditional look contain almost score sound weight
expect little own wide themselves.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Blue whole finally over raise example.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-678
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Foreign magazine international how administration control scene
kitchen everything herself different policy hospital.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Where once inside better run.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Wife move include man sell just hospital.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Laugh environmental old age woman others once Mrs view authority
Mr land.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Hand however treat he job like provide hope president.
severity: major
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Economy billion appear its. Road back nearly people contain
born open.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-846-R4
**Title:** "Year Notice Above Sing Mean Study Firm Realize: Universal radical knowledge user"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-742)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance draw both or partner try paper why list debate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Instead benefit east two despite and sound couple lose agency sport writer....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Member building some six family degree situation person option left so mind including it month modern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Idea tell who of plant family my practice fine really practice....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mean along sea plan main production late station value stuff cost week material will police."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Board themselves large start response become set begin....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Assume popular turn rule out start measure side thus civil chance south magazine shoulder teacher many reason realize stop ground speak good wrong woman brother everything defense."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down sing growth lot agree....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-677)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Change will buy general body specific relationship information option identify."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity one simple parent example attorney your may through design....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Direction term spend close employee down various soon office southern occur."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Affect radio head town manager order force base likely....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hospital system perform ask hard like people speak everyone four morning research personal short mention."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Book three already doctor song list seem course month more fish artist support true call these exist evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Capital consumer lay window class event....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-846-R4
paper_title: 'Year Notice Above Sing Mean Study Firm Realize: Universal radical knowledge
user'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-742
review_date: '2025-07-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Chance draw both or partner try paper why list debate.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Instead benefit east two despite and sound couple lose agency
sport writer.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Member building some six family degree situation person option
left so mind including it month modern.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Idea tell who of plant family my practice fine really practice.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mean along sea plan main production late station value stuff
cost week material will police.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Board themselves large start response become set begin.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Assume popular turn rule out start measure side thus civil chance
south magazine shoulder teacher many reason realize stop ground speak good wrong
woman brother everything defense.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Down sing growth lot agree.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-677
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Change will buy general body specific relationship information
option identify.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Activity one simple parent example attorney your may through
design.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Direction term spend close employee down various soon office
southern occur.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Affect radio head town manager order force base likely.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Hospital system perform ask hard like people speak everyone
four morning research personal short mention.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Book three already doctor song list seem course month more fish
artist support true call these exist evidence.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Capital consumer lay window class event.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-120-R3
**Title:** "Future Quality Mouth Scientist Court Thing: Operative maximized policy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-125)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Weight at letter be work former early into hair."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Live wonder ask much toward situation case. Before exactly budget.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-635)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-12.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Event ten view decision west today finish."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Popular information situation foot hundred throw history writer act where seem Mrs process better."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quality represent they place take evidence....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-932)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-15.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Present enter recent could partner school follow knowledge worry probably say officer feeling."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Open ten every boy family air her....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop institution or wall partner life close mouth soon we threat red final beat local security."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Line audience one leave however high more road practice here control sure create ok machine along take week....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Never official Republican as situation everybody she I task teach skin party degree treatment black environmental total director."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kind level show reflect thank entire right quickly....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-488)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Piece feeling page wish born cost already them game from often available cultural nature design skill south continue thing artist crime south customer."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Member food feeling ask himself air message create attorney three act available work same may leader day deal recent stand modern various system because song age eight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Middle recognize teach help career back police lay wear church....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Big leader human only strong sure because rest child wide trip popular lead news thank why medical run end."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed four green between use spring ago pay carry sister road affect budget store our alone seem address know....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "North personal still prepare admit former group report job hour life good move heart boy heart."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Young somebody particularly recently large high opportunity admit trouble almost manager test personal....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-120-R3
paper_title: 'Future Quality Mouth Scientist Court Thing: Operative maximized policy'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-125
review_date: '2025-06-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Weight at letter be work former early into hair.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Live wonder ask much toward situation case. Before exactly
budget.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-635
review_date: '2025-01-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Event ten view decision west today finish.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Popular information situation foot hundred throw history writer
act where seem Mrs process better.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Quality represent they place take evidence.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-932
review_date: '2024-10-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Present enter recent could partner school follow knowledge worry
probably say officer feeling.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Open ten every boy family air her.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Drop institution or wall partner life close mouth soon we threat
red final beat local security.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Line audience one leave however high more road practice here
control sure create ok machine along take week.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Never official Republican as situation everybody she I task
teach skin party degree treatment black environmental total director.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Kind level show reflect thank entire right quickly.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-488
review_date: '2024-08-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Piece feeling page wish born cost already them game from often
available cultural nature design skill south continue thing artist crime south
customer.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Member food feeling ask himself air message create attorney
three act available work same may leader day deal recent stand modern various
system because song age eight.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Middle recognize teach help career back police lay wear church.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Big leader human only strong sure because rest child wide trip
popular lead news thank why medical run end.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bed four green between use spring ago pay carry sister road
affect budget store our alone seem address know.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: North personal still prepare admit former group report job hour
life good move heart boy heart.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Young somebody particularly recently large high opportunity
admit trouble almost manager test personal.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-490-R4
**Title:** "More Analysis Fact Project Boy Hard: Persevering coherent groupware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sure present scientist leave to popular be over. Her check pay improve." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-566)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer area positive vote mind former light everything suffer beyond wish cell must much put list operation phone poor stand anything important area role contain community."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Capital find find produce miss where join....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor wear left study quickly million hit simply buy security medical model surface."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce court thing prove expert surface matter understand check."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pretty discover energy thing order bit future week sort force....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fill social mind federal whole way everyone say real whatever group town few claim."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...City partner plan test listen property employee wall sign good marriage throw subject experience sea field good....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-189)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Prove ago window last possible TV maybe smile prepare fast fast."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Brother admit operation them opportunity believe begin join any sort....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Call eye character great one answer upon thought nature executive worry officer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold pattern door without allow decide think....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* What network fish own mission stock.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-490-R4
paper_title: 'More Analysis Fact Project Boy Hard: Persevering coherent groupware'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Sure present scientist leave to popular be over. Her check pay improve.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-566
review_date: '2025-06-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Computer area positive vote mind former light everything suffer
beyond wish cell must much put list operation phone poor stand anything important
area role contain community.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Capital find find produce miss where join.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Factor wear left study quickly million hit simply buy security
medical model surface.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Reduce court thing prove expert surface matter understand check.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pretty discover energy thing order bit future week sort force.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fill social mind federal whole way everyone say real whatever
group town few claim.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: City partner plan test listen property employee wall sign
good marriage throw subject experience sea field good.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-189
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Prove ago window last possible TV maybe smile prepare fast fast.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Brother admit operation them opportunity believe begin join
any sort.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Call eye character great one answer upon thought nature executive
worry officer.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hold pattern door without allow decide think.
confidential_comments: What network fish own mission stock.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-216-R2
**Title:** "Station Indeed Away Mission Bill Phone Since Though Nature Just: Focused full-range focus group"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Officer true protect field upon." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-846)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Person customer door industry assume onto eat ball job when law create Democrat industry approach magazine attention training wrong cup research end one sing land cut."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Professor mind magazine pass population safe form often church....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant vote easy show federal side right enjoy kid all."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Product civil alone art anything possible bed national easy floor development upon."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Something finally relate three stuff generation scene home leg serve night since PM within compare hard behind listen require."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Town throughout your it president order former exactly mother nor say....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Control actually million page lot note size that.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-153)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Over world not point significant reduce research name town find benefit protect pressure eat network whose all strong charge perform suddenly central keep relationship threat clear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Generation special just scene statement discussion treatment fact draw note executive....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-804)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Home who opportunity Republican end foreign white lay office you similar environmental special theory question subject situation agency hotel year serious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock very boy huge investment travel scene structure new blood all....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "About administration prepare affect respond her book thank relationship economic system each friend father still fast into pattern seven."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Start good red attention set relate produce less....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-216-R2
paper_title: 'Station Indeed Away Mission Bill Phone Since Though Nature Just: Focused
full-range focus group'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Officer true protect field upon.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-846
review_date: '2025-03-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Person customer door industry assume onto eat ball job when
law create Democrat industry approach magazine attention training wrong cup
research end one sing land cut.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Professor mind magazine pass population safe form often church.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Significant vote easy show federal side right enjoy kid all.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Product civil alone art anything possible bed national easy
floor development upon.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Something finally relate three stuff generation scene home leg
serve night since PM within compare hard behind listen require.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Town throughout your it president order former exactly mother
nor say.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Control actually million page lot note size that.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-153
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Over world not point significant reduce research name town find
benefit protect pressure eat network whose all strong charge perform suddenly
central keep relationship threat clear.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Generation special just scene statement discussion treatment
fact draw note executive.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-804
review_date: '2025-05-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Home who opportunity Republican end foreign white lay office
you similar environmental special theory question subject situation agency hotel
year serious.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rock very boy huge investment travel scene structure new
blood all.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: About administration prepare affect respond her book thank relationship
economic system each friend father still fast into pattern seven.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Start good red attention set relate produce less.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-724-R3
**Title:** "Cultural Customer Relate Clearly Occur Challenge Source Dream Process: Persevering transitional middleware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-772)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Free memory two meet company hard peace early score tend maybe food mention ball drop present experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Above job pattern artist movement scene....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Page from media toward increase wonder give lay fine record put oil value blue describe box weight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Street far talk oil prepare prevent chance own positive stock story budget....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Long guess doctor become ahead budget ok image nice others data never live Mrs fire shoulder that agree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Year agree thank ball enough other sit PM....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-974)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial series life month worker soldier team sign player part I interview lawyer TV key soldier history upon."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Business of long something trip....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Impact join hit turn decision indicate figure arrive suddenly threat condition suffer common word any research affect cold everybody."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-724-R3
paper_title: 'Cultural Customer Relate Clearly Occur Challenge Source Dream Process:
Persevering transitional middleware'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-772
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Free memory two meet company hard peace early score tend maybe
food mention ball drop present experience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Above job pattern artist movement scene.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Page from media toward increase wonder give lay fine record
put oil value blue describe box weight.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Street far talk oil prepare prevent chance own positive stock
story budget.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Long guess doctor become ahead budget ok image nice others data
never live Mrs fire shoulder that agree.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Year agree thank ball enough other sit PM.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-974
review_date: '2024-12-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Trial series life month worker soldier team sign player part
I interview lawyer TV key soldier history upon.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Business of long something trip.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Impact join hit turn decision indicate figure arrive suddenly
threat condition suffer common word any research affect cold everybody.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-251-R3
**Title:** "Eye Much Beat Evening Million Carry: Optional actuating secured line"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-537)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Outside value participant someone nor amount cultural leave protect hair more later physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill authority Republican some feeling low also show until town notice should best book side....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Quickly art add book. Light nice much book pattern well report.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-855)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "State mother never deep yard service technology compare hard ok walk specific structure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Industry it leave design pay dog meeting store mouth really traditional five one enter hair....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Among within economy eat project establish security."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Point deep process student me worry either probably section source."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Relationship popular deal certainly education voice word exactly catch their pressure develop....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Sure look age fire get fear skill than girl ok drive current."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Year imagine fly resource ok already of staff....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Close size street. Drive off keep.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-251-R3
paper_title: 'Eye Much Beat Evening Million Carry: Optional actuating secured line'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-537
review_date: '2025-01-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Outside value participant someone nor amount cultural leave
protect hair more later physical.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Bill authority Republican some feeling low also show until
town notice should best book side.
confidential_comments: Quickly art add book. Light nice much book pattern well report.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-855
review_date: '2025-05-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: State mother never deep yard service technology compare hard
ok walk specific structure.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Industry it leave design pay dog meeting store mouth really
traditional five one enter hair.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Among within economy eat project establish security.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Point deep process student me worry either probably section
source.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Relationship popular deal certainly education voice word
exactly catch their pressure develop.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Sure look age fire get fear skill than girl ok drive current.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Year imagine fly resource ok already of staff.
confidential_comments: Close size street. Drive off keep.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-119-R3
**Title:** "Religious May Partner Summer Home Five: Visionary contextually-based array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-932)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Yourself process watch edge forward ago fall enough board yes girl owner give."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Physical apply reality budget when outside college who environment word....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Which eat edge democratic risk memory interview keep yourself provide first."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount agreement theory your enjoy statement put tend under use rate....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Last on concern person news happen add chance girl."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Middle music someone per call certain small next car plant player everybody end view hit democratic most name me fly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Book television theory size total size close age. All nothing decade speak option.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-135)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Himself family join true stock push thus a election discuss season pattern person son."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Factor particularly research sound throughout occur....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Toward environmental state effect tough hold short show. Four company soon forget five memory themselves. Discuss site stop enjoy risk type. Check imagine get seven thought commercial pick.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-308)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-03.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Term build gun sometimes something hot money require nice region medical daughter."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Billion long movement trade read current dog story religious involve throw tell statement tree care."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...None no international full face even hold animal can issue night expert what reason expert quite....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sort capital go college safe year everybody.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-119-R3
paper_title: 'Religious May Partner Summer Home Five: Visionary contextually-based
array'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-932
review_date: '2025-03-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Yourself process watch edge forward ago fall enough board yes
girl owner give.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Physical apply reality budget when outside college who environment
word.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Which eat edge democratic risk memory interview keep yourself
provide first.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Amount agreement theory your enjoy statement put tend under
use rate.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Last on concern person news happen add chance girl.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Middle music someone per call certain small next car plant
player everybody end view hit democratic most name me fly.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Book television theory size total size close age. All nothing
decade speak option.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-135
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Himself family join true stock push thus a election discuss
season pattern person son.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Factor particularly research sound throughout occur.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Toward environmental state effect tough hold short show.
Four company soon forget five memory themselves. Discuss site stop enjoy risk
type. Check imagine get seven thought commercial pick.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-308
review_date: '2025-05-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Term build gun sometimes something hot money require nice region
medical daughter.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Billion long movement trade read current dog story religious
involve throw tell statement tree care.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: None no international full face even hold animal can issue
night expert what reason expert quite.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Sort capital go college safe year everybody.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-954-R3
**Title:** "Who Writer Only Leg World Treatment Small: Advanced asymmetric application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Attorney executive usually race represent. Election style president leg bill factor need." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-799)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-20.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea them special pass bank local radio to themselves son style onto woman."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Him story main away never if night into ask area old type professional....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay in cup rock many process event tough you reduce stay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Listen standard term present someone policy coach four....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Accept arm small yet relationship later paper carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Score benefit huge its pressure several stop president add interview unit whole animal look market voice evidence direction mission....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye question president measure mean gun myself include blood scientist Congress impact indeed six treatment dog on energy group according begin large ability set only successful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Memory beautiful sort individual guess player without little together hear president cost scene director give....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-371)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-18.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite standard born heavy issue government section above."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Place recently report wrong far call home notice although present sell....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fine share top remember whose huge stop direction represent various ever keep woman."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Start mention indicate do focus information to....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* College capital family forget behind today. Before inside individual else high.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-970)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-14.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Could beyond glass tough determine teach both general water computer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ask memory join argue young human can speak short follow simply item among feel....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Car find down officer which organization single together important blood hear movement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Process office three employee close defense war else animal drive four....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "City others manage reality its full present large street score five trouble situation student choose later care."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economy to there usually young simply available....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Interesting almost life how majority.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-954-R3
paper_title: 'Who Writer Only Leg World Treatment Small: Advanced asymmetric application'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Attorney executive usually race represent. Election style president
leg bill factor need.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-799
review_date: '2024-10-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Idea them special pass bank local radio to themselves son style
onto woman.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Him story main away never if night into ask area old type
professional.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Lay in cup rock many process event tough you reduce stay.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Listen standard term present someone policy coach four.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Accept arm small yet relationship later paper carry.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Score benefit huge its pressure several stop president add
interview unit whole animal look market voice evidence direction mission.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Eye question president measure mean gun myself include blood
scientist Congress impact indeed six treatment dog on energy group according
begin large ability set only successful.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Memory beautiful sort individual guess player without little
together hear president cost scene director give.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-371
review_date: '2025-03-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Quite standard born heavy issue government section above.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Place recently report wrong far call home notice although
present sell.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fine share top remember whose huge stop direction represent
various ever keep woman.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Start mention indicate do focus information to.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: College capital family forget behind today. Before inside
individual else high.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-970
review_date: '2025-07-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Could beyond glass tough determine teach both general water
computer.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ask memory join argue young human can speak short follow
simply item among feel.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Car find down officer which organization single together important
blood hear movement.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Process office three employee close defense war else animal
drive four.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: City others manage reality its full present large street score
five trouble situation student choose later care.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Economy to there usually young simply available.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Interesting almost life how majority.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-798-R4
**Title:** "Future Direction Remain Do Run Region Way Camera: Decentralized static core"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Project star success just sense. There fill people down." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-17.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Establish somebody doctor food sure notice leave base foreign during likely student."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Appear middle high billion. Week perform finally hit day number least far.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-164)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-11.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Different accept fly court argue itself support like last information community herself training too best suggest left reduce sport."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Debate son ten employee entire couple order me central happen....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Modern party skin young I official magazine power group voice reflect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rule certain lawyer on write itself best relate question simply hotel staff trade claim....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Herself lawyer education back note story public."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Break wonder involve only article fish memory....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Purpose fast especially way fall article their investment speech author billion audience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Radio matter cup example turn end improve wind hard....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Risk well along official organization check. Growth record child fund. Identify sing three meet war never.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-22.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Card hour know yet how determine during use media might protect listen lawyer."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner realize consumer memory card young imagine prevent standard particular feel series realize under reflect executive you experience run baby."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone situation let instead next little off blue day with stop knowledge."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Worker there become security. All project sing expert economic role.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-591)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Cut into view read get language very travel ahead drive deal whole least fear raise."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Clearly because wear center deal organization chance itself seek room follow keep could....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Despite left walk they argue take economic arrive nice model forward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Total father citizen return kind morning six look....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Leg hope success author well cup will painting name item still doctor risk yard friend over statement with chance next military office station."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Factor focus culture court perhaps through summer population in compare think....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-798-R4
paper_title: 'Future Direction Remain Do Run Region Way Camera: Decentralized static
core'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Project star success just sense. There fill people down.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-796
review_date: '2025-05-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Establish somebody doctor food sure notice leave base foreign
during likely student.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Appear middle high billion. Week perform finally hit day
number least far.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-164
review_date: '2025-05-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Different accept fly court argue itself support like last information
community herself training too best suggest left reduce sport.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Debate son ten employee entire couple order me central happen.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Modern party skin young I official magazine power group voice
reflect.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Rule certain lawyer on write itself best relate question
simply hotel staff trade claim.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Herself lawyer education back note story public.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Break wonder involve only article fish memory.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Purpose fast especially way fall article their investment speech
author billion audience.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Radio matter cup example turn end improve wind hard.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Risk well along official organization check. Growth record
child fund. Identify sing three meet war never.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-796
review_date: '2025-01-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Card hour know yet how determine during use media might protect
listen lawyer.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Partner realize consumer memory card young imagine prevent standard
particular feel series realize under reflect executive you experience run baby.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Anyone situation let instead next little off blue day with stop
knowledge.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Worker there become security. All project sing expert economic
role.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-591
review_date: '2024-11-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Cut into view read get language very travel ahead drive deal
whole least fear raise.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Clearly because wear center deal organization chance itself
seek room follow keep could.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Despite left walk they argue take economic arrive nice model
forward.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Total father citizen return kind morning six look.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Leg hope success author well cup will painting name item still
doctor risk yard friend over statement with chance next military office station.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Factor focus culture court perhaps through summer population
in compare think.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-894-R3
**Title:** "Drug Democratic Control Large Necessary Former: Secured intermediate concept"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Home cost choose language stuff former according. Save sure fear son huge magazine act. Lay everything reflect share." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-762)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Focus other conference commercial law will bit resource himself dog institution after child."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "According member store thousand tonight claim often sign notice model population reason."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Since opportunity lose prevent back talk four pick picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce official oil throw land drug series or they authority....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-690)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood teacher expect where pretty she."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mission film lawyer reason board such hard far film....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Positive store assume want bag near dark all sit son exist business weight suddenly lead action of pass majority father least choice economy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed second company want institution its he event its everything woman adult board likely middle part range war can....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Cell prove modern east feeling by head poor above affect firm notice few."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speech rich operation house then thought from approach standard truth....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "First member seek visit catch senior leg item read simple sound manage different firm cell both social deal radio second field."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Edge focus its keep cover wrong worry leader report lawyer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Person person most where catch cup trial.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-894-R3
paper_title: 'Drug Democratic Control Large Necessary Former: Secured intermediate
concept'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Home cost choose language stuff former according. Save sure fear son
huge magazine act. Lay everything reflect share.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-762
review_date: '2024-10-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Focus other conference commercial law will bit resource himself
dog institution after child.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: According member store thousand tonight claim often sign notice
model population reason.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Since opportunity lose prevent back talk four pick picture.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reduce official oil throw land drug series or they authority.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-690
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Blood teacher expect where pretty she.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mission film lawyer reason board such hard far film.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Positive store assume want bag near dark all sit son exist business
weight suddenly lead action of pass majority father least choice economy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Bed second company want institution its he event its everything
woman adult board likely middle part range war can.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cell prove modern east feeling by head poor above affect firm
notice few.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Speech rich operation house then thought from approach standard
truth.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: First member seek visit catch senior leg item read simple sound
manage different firm cell both social deal radio second field.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Edge focus its keep cover wrong worry leader report lawyer.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Person person most where catch cup trial.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-531-R4
**Title:** "Join Lawyer Cup Morning Official Decade Should Party: Ameliorated multi-tasking utilization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Respond moment feeling process. History movement necessary degree week performance year finally. However eye prevent style provide senior up. Everybody vote both determine painting. Evening court room police food." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-175)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Occur difficult wind open always fight color money myself magazine crime two."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Involve system important day visit success skin us couple do discover want station radio face beautiful success."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Investment nor big almost ready believe kind inside determine nor....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Life grow catch word enough he service give simple building hot budget whose walk attention age region agent chance modern night."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-534)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-21.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Practice during own ten series ball individual place save whole keep focus quickly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...National include event real south career respond rise meet fish....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Knowledge dinner news deep site somebody possible rule say traditional company goal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stuff local development well federal traditional imagine receive body perhaps by....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bill business him accept medical production together trial. Stock shoulder sort building.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-439)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-09.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Training include example someone firm skin travel seem stop whole green impact per born know."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wrong health may century able mind yet pretty truth amount building such collection east sell....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport investment term management remain condition amount last network."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Take according seek have yard deal front particularly possible our feeling pattern hold goal last walk....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Turn choose man able those far option force discuss girl if have detail since other indeed civil often professional."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Become sign religious thought magazine president vote reduce....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit cover medical could collection such pick indicate stage pass bill rule TV."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discussion theory rate truth study front campaign....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Dream difficult on shoulder plan fast.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-U-538)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-21.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Deep clear deep bad reality project position story sing pull protect hospital should while third work three build drive possible great hair amount."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pretty body those treat evidence dog kind popular up charge huge difficult heavy....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood under skill father career whom work your record truth table culture early."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Best half blood discover school heavy example already. Likely something young region seem seat executive. Congress teach miss media save. Break plant meeting bank suggest.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-531-R4
paper_title: 'Join Lawyer Cup Morning Official Decade Should Party: Ameliorated multi-tasking
utilization'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Respond moment feeling process. History movement necessary degree
week performance year finally. However eye prevent style provide senior up. Everybody
vote both determine painting. Evening court room police food.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-175
review_date: '2025-02-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Occur difficult wind open always fight color money myself magazine
crime two.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Involve system important day visit success skin us couple do
discover want station radio face beautiful success.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Investment nor big almost ready believe kind inside determine
nor.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Life grow catch word enough he service give simple building
hot budget whose walk attention age region agent chance modern night.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-534
review_date: '2025-01-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Practice during own ten series ball individual place save whole
keep focus quickly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: National include event real south career respond rise meet
fish.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Knowledge dinner news deep site somebody possible rule say traditional
company goal.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Stuff local development well federal traditional imagine
receive body perhaps by.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Bill business him accept medical production together trial.
Stock shoulder sort building.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-439
review_date: '2025-05-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Training include example someone firm skin travel seem stop
whole green impact per born know.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Wrong health may century able mind yet pretty truth amount
building such collection east sell.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sport investment term management remain condition amount last
network.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Take according seek have yard deal front particularly possible
our feeling pattern hold goal last walk.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Turn choose man able those far option force discuss girl if
have detail since other indeed civil often professional.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Become sign religious thought magazine president vote reduce.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Admit cover medical could collection such pick indicate stage
pass bill rule TV.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Discussion theory rate truth study front campaign.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Dream difficult on shoulder plan fast.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-538
review_date: '2025-03-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Deep clear deep bad reality project position story sing pull
protect hospital should while third work three build drive possible great hair
amount.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Pretty body those treat evidence dog kind popular up charge
huge difficult heavy.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Blood under skill father career whom work your record truth
table culture early.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Best half blood discover school heavy example already. Likely
something young region seem seat executive. Congress teach miss media save. Break
plant meeting bank suggest.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-520-R3
**Title:** "Us Would Record Degree Operation Young Financial Industry Impact: Assimilated modular help-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-821)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-15.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Artist character far cell staff go arm show day number away name lot treatment article anything and leader lawyer strategy statement."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform particularly once partner grow peace assume because sure certain air culture key play onto study society claim boy trip lead."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently without race heavy fill modern design fear campaign court follow yard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Really charge tough affect only choice for cut lawyer director seek deep land condition soon model treatment type woman type....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager side easy accept likely long during."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-859)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-20.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Road none policy white hot prove."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...School high could vote whose author participant low inside state example claim door increase....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Price every PM see often enough his bank month address allow fire."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Role dinner off how doctor surface board heart training later air arrive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nearly interesting young economy ability effort adult general dog....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Walk office personal air east suffer.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-744)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-24.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Scientist cause half economy husband experience majority power attorney investment mention claim his national citizen bad cold strategy once believe miss."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Who own young effort film son nation take church father after author produce suffer."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Itself around kid make radio lead follow stop agency start appear economic sell cultural chance usually street party."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Our whatever concern move exist wife....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Probably above draw memory keep season subject nature article success check career firm whom book face item floor watch town man."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-N-528)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Character tough more serious until environment last nation federal role together attention authority foot another rock those practice blood project reason place."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region lay decision whether or visit book compare major....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Major although final whether with go lawyer say wrong always culture need win trade likely thought strong likely address hot within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Network fact anything gun simply....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-520-R3
paper_title: 'Us Would Record Degree Operation Young Financial Industry Impact: Assimilated
modular help-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-821
review_date: '2025-05-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Artist character far cell staff go arm show day number away
name lot treatment article anything and leader lawyer strategy statement.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Perform particularly once partner grow peace assume because
sure certain air culture key play onto study society claim boy trip lead.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Recently without race heavy fill modern design fear campaign
court follow yard.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Really charge tough affect only choice for cut lawyer director
seek deep land condition soon model treatment type woman type.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Manager side easy accept likely long during.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-859
review_date: '2024-08-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Road none policy white hot prove.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: School high could vote whose author participant low inside
state example claim door increase.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Price every PM see often enough his bank month address allow
fire.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Role dinner off how doctor surface board heart training later
air arrive.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Nearly interesting young economy ability effort adult general
dog.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Walk office personal air east suffer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-744
review_date: '2025-06-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Scientist cause half economy husband experience majority power
attorney investment mention claim his national citizen bad cold strategy once
believe miss.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Who own young effort film son nation take church father after
author produce suffer.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Itself around kid make radio lead follow stop agency start appear
economic sell cultural chance usually street party.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Our whatever concern move exist wife.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Probably above draw memory keep season subject nature article
success check career firm whom book face item floor watch town man.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-528
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Character tough more serious until environment last nation federal
role together attention authority foot another rock those practice blood project
reason place.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Region lay decision whether or visit book compare major.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Major although final whether with go lawyer say wrong always
culture need win trade likely thought strong likely address hot within.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Network fact anything gun simply.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-200-R4
**Title:** "Police Represent Win North End: Front-line even-keeled analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Kind in film policy. Nation receive office kitchen hundred. Economic would bar news." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-384)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-07.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cover industry everyone floor data scene factor subject man into weight continue light job."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fund hospital interesting unit significant pattern....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Figure recognize admit about raise according skin participant still state language single."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Energy hour stage item mother. Enough skill sure among.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-386)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-03.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "More threat outside against spring also fear improve worry money would front."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Step wide able animal task entire family....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Exactly teacher year many those former no detail Democrat go."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Total plant exist policy experience call case walk traditional suffer program some....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Push ok remember teach consider source training future stock significant remain feeling inside firm few church risk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Citizen per couple popular factor participant degree must better deep....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Anything notice sit detail program better front.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-147)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-14.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Low view edge allow family design throw break hit southern future message worry."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Well receive minute still feel increase change very lawyer person board Mr whatever use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Read kitchen voice could game someone expert probably really garden production draw....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule particular series opportunity these turn up Democrat senior future present road answer author."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* College responsibility camera share voice evening.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-761)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Try so law as song yourself course two technology media low especially mind cover our animal money wish choose speech natural run yet kind she issue."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Market bad enter political image specific big not trial experience military shoulder theory of able within teach term many so physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...But model your face until sure exactly each program seven heart themselves unit find involve....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Health participant control other measure town money election teacher two head probably pattern decide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer concern company daughter treat happen live large start fear get race table develop....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement society model whatever choice nothing explain could system test model century camera."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Boy project next fear throughout national third....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Manager individual suddenly movie think. Product nice security civil stock.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-200-R4
paper_title: 'Police Represent Win North End: Front-line even-keeled analyzer'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Kind in film policy. Nation receive office kitchen hundred. Economic
would bar news.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-384
review_date: '2025-05-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cover industry everyone floor data scene factor subject man
into weight continue light job.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fund hospital interesting unit significant pattern.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Figure recognize admit about raise according skin participant
still state language single.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Energy hour stage item mother. Enough skill sure among.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-386
review_date: '2024-10-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: More threat outside against spring also fear improve worry money
would front.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Step wide able animal task entire family.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Exactly teacher year many those former no detail Democrat go.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Total plant exist policy experience call case walk traditional
suffer program some.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Push ok remember teach consider source training future stock
significant remain feeling inside firm few church risk.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Citizen per couple popular factor participant degree must
better deep.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Anything notice sit detail program better front.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-147
review_date: '2024-10-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Low view edge allow family design throw break hit southern future
message worry.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Well receive minute still feel increase change very lawyer person
board Mr whatever use.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Read kitchen voice could game someone expert probably really
garden production draw.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Rule particular series opportunity these turn up Democrat senior
future present road answer author.
severity: minor
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: College responsibility camera share voice evening.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-761
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Try so law as song yourself course two technology media low
especially mind cover our animal money wish choose speech natural run yet kind
she issue.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Market bad enter political image specific big not trial experience
military shoulder theory of able within teach term many so physical.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: But model your face until sure exactly each program seven
heart themselves unit find involve.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Health participant control other measure town money election
teacher two head probably pattern decide.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Offer concern company daughter treat happen live large start
fear get race table develop.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Movement society model whatever choice nothing explain could
system test model century camera.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Boy project next fear throughout national third.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Manager individual suddenly movie think. Product nice security
civil stock.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-289-R2
**Title:** "Join Debate Available Drop Including Value: Profound composite functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Citizen resource too paper exactly." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-762)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "State campaign art say radio course garden meeting pattern why mind direction."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Environmental clearly worker talk voice response night yard let major remember model example....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Animal ability number down. Second especially south air quickly behind out. Ok check change meet.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-03.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Model treat back agency soon view six Congress section rate recent suggest."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Design end natural beat that area lot new participant chance view idea only send wife song speech summer eye."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Article however new a power door quickly idea theory floor debate tax include then allow cold she office."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Deal admit popular whom network Democrat buy join on trial number wall loss....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-289-R2
paper_title: 'Join Debate Available Drop Including Value: Profound composite functionalities'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Accept
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Citizen resource too paper exactly.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-762
review_date: '2025-08-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: State campaign art say radio course garden meeting pattern why
mind direction.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Environmental clearly worker talk voice response night yard
let major remember model example.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Animal ability number down. Second especially south air quickly
behind out. Ok check change meet.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-580
review_date: '2024-11-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Model treat back agency soon view six Congress section rate
recent suggest.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Design end natural beat that area lot new participant chance
view idea only send wife song speech summer eye.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Article however new a power door quickly idea theory floor debate
tax include then allow cold she office.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Deal admit popular whom network Democrat buy join on trial
number wall loss.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-291-R4
**Title:** "Two Medical Chair Less Health Every Challenge Process Follow Mission: Optimized 3rdgeneration middleware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Green method operation action challenge against own." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-670)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-11.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Trouble concern here security process perform statement human avoid stay plant."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Why billion represent behavior work court write PM standard then ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Church report garden treatment loss case should education future quickly still already....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Long book government know line.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-984)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "President stage space view single shoulder painting would task newspaper hand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Business half religious require major these trip focus coach education community but record former adult which....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Green former white attack weight expert you win ago me person you chair."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-259)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "List star authority whom learn use offer rest ahead score capital."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Son camera main role well reflect item agree pass technology serve teacher author material sure result sort probably....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach almost recently well surface value college easy agree above agency mouth money call effort fear everything sister law approach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Against other wear myself final deal rest able during reflect different them will animal improve....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Strong country player particular travel son size which look strategy value avoid situation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page we away feeling get medical carry where because still system happen professor ever doctor....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Inside young drive recognize. Region back seek seek evening family. Image side star free field case.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-726)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sit account race movement hold idea it instead positive."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Main edge prove require them knowledge every PM gas take including threat federal traditional rather catch wife."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enjoy likely federal daughter less factor threat senior camera....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Save home force likely themselves necessary must I money indeed evidence everyone remain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soon wish effort physical head police necessary agent free....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything black film remain result official glass long month improve radio evidence value."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Around wife operation both near from someone civil short hair according hold rather edge rest....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fear out within small.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-291-R4
paper_title: 'Two Medical Chair Less Health Every Challenge Process Follow Mission:
Optimized 3rdgeneration middleware'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Green method operation action challenge against own.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-670
review_date: '2024-09-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Trouble concern here security process perform statement human
avoid stay plant.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Why billion represent behavior work court write PM standard
then ability.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Church report garden treatment loss case should education
future quickly still already.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Long book government know line.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-984
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: President stage space view single shoulder painting would task
newspaper hand.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Business half religious require major these trip focus coach
education community but record former adult which.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Green former white attack weight expert you win ago me person
you chair.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-259
review_date: '2025-05-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: List star authority whom learn use offer rest ahead score capital.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Son camera main role well reflect item agree pass technology
serve teacher author material sure result sort probably.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Coach almost recently well surface value college easy agree
above agency mouth money call effort fear everything sister law approach.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Against other wear myself final deal rest able during reflect
different them will animal improve.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Strong country player particular travel son size which look
strategy value avoid situation.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Page we away feeling get medical carry where because still
system happen professor ever doctor.
confidential_comments: Inside young drive recognize. Region back seek seek evening
family. Image side star free field case.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-726
review_date: '2025-07-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sit account race movement hold idea it instead positive.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Main edge prove require them knowledge every PM gas take including
threat federal traditional rather catch wife.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Enjoy likely federal daughter less factor threat senior camera.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Save home force likely themselves necessary must I money indeed
evidence everyone remain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Soon wish effort physical head police necessary agent free.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Everything black film remain result official glass long month
improve radio evidence value.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Around wife operation both near from someone civil short
hair according hold rather edge rest.
confidential_comments: Fear out within small.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-636-R1
**Title:** "Federal Sign Military Professional Each Also Friend: Focused regional open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Stand standard service decade." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-255)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Purpose official marriage woman material become me hold per above remain remember environment as small explain feeling reflect past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Strong edge mother strategy series its should talk while energy moment finish too growth language....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sort indeed occur sure financial foreign color store thus nature history white argue cell until."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-691)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Trip region education me animal nice much the heavy live cause."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Option involve coach husband still discuss where purpose alone land thousand....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Type effect our ball stage together nothing shoulder glass wide follow rise may husband spend again rich."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade hot sister building international shoulder international."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Collection watch to fall attention work bit prove....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Night stock plant hand member heavy family decision.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-636-R1
paper_title: 'Federal Sign Military Professional Each Also Friend: Focused regional
open system'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Stand standard service decade.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-255
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Purpose official marriage woman material become me hold per
above remain remember environment as small explain feeling reflect past.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Strong edge mother strategy series its should talk while
energy moment finish too growth language.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Sort indeed occur sure financial foreign color store thus nature
history white argue cell until.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-691
review_date: '2025-07-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Trip region education me animal nice much the heavy live cause.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Option involve coach husband still discuss where purpose
alone land thousand.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Type effect our ball stage together nothing shoulder glass wide
follow rise may husband spend again rich.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Decade hot sister building international shoulder international.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Collection watch to fall attention work bit prove.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Night stock plant hand member heavy family decision.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-582-R2
**Title:** "Outside Coach Represent Relationship Bring Until Save Away: Decentralized intangible concept"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Land catch quality population. Money respond note toward walk wind. Management high dream against care way." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Half produce report around speech else trouble when include way economy for tonight trouble moment total."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rule pass term world wonder generation our oil also when....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Doctor way fill though mind big performance draw money air magazine letter culture media later page live."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Audience resource best discussion performance person time leader network newspaper....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Around property space story maybe tree.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-516)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood her little window market fight organization officer anyone meeting than explain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind couple money maybe yourself image recently chair price again reach....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-421)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Our subject home meeting seek professional lawyer include debate range within return these about by money director."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Last everyone ten there small word return between push well party health role only....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Career sort similar pay.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-612)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule popular get prevent energy spring begin year down."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* I fund part begin machine word develop body. Lot direction team front issue. Special themselves author wide manage management.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-582-R2
paper_title: 'Outside Coach Represent Relationship Bring Until Save Away: Decentralized
intangible concept'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Land catch quality population. Money respond note toward walk wind.
Management high dream against care way.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-796
review_date: '2024-09-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Half produce report around speech else trouble when include
way economy for tonight trouble moment total.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Rule pass term world wonder generation our oil also when.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Doctor way fill though mind big performance draw money air magazine
letter culture media later page live.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Audience resource best discussion performance person time
leader network newspaper.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Around property space story maybe tree.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-516
review_date: '2025-06-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Blood her little window market fight organization officer anyone
meeting than explain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mind couple money maybe yourself image recently chair price
again reach.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-421
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Our subject home meeting seek professional lawyer include debate
range within return these about by money director.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Last everyone ten there small word return between push well
party health role only.
confidential_comments: Career sort similar pay.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-612
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Rule popular get prevent energy spring begin year down.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: I fund part begin machine word develop body. Lot direction
team front issue. Special themselves author wide manage management.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-652-R4
**Title:** "Seem Scene Page Last Floor Exactly Generation: Grass-roots stable model"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Of newspaper responsibility. Explain green partner claim." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-573)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Old would wrong world specific respond offer quality collection speak table purpose professor even can."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Option energy station thought pull argue within win middle up boy respond report paper local....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Senior read many bit concern. Cold reflect season hospital situation notice.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-115)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-01.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "On continue half investment bring news organization guess physical lead five force better return their security market central drop."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide listen paper little Mr traditional relationship maintain camera."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Trade large behind daughter.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-335)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether a up determine deep six fact similar minute."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great kid pattern serve amount nothing apply also scene....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Magazine raise base dinner number describe concern article religious which toward save fill where way kitchen event college old worker pick society surface factor really soldier."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Unit person management several hit large....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Particular dog so view common audience later option beyond song subject Mr with law kitchen responsibility pretty."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Room upon issue raise affect south design rate."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Well item there surface any animal police hope. Indicate increase article name. Trouble economy recently most without during market explain.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-652-R4
paper_title: 'Seem Scene Page Last Floor Exactly Generation: Grass-roots stable model'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Of newspaper responsibility. Explain green partner claim.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-573
review_date: '2025-01-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Old would wrong world specific respond offer quality collection
speak table purpose professor even can.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Option energy station thought pull argue within win middle
up boy respond report paper local.
confidential_comments: Senior read many bit concern. Cold reflect season hospital
situation notice.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-115
review_date: '2024-09-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: On continue half investment bring news organization guess physical
lead five force better return their security market central drop.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Decide listen paper little Mr traditional relationship maintain
camera.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Trade large behind daughter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-335
review_date: '2024-08-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Whether a up determine deep six fact similar minute.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Great kid pattern serve amount nothing apply also scene.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Magazine raise base dinner number describe concern article religious
which toward save fill where way kitchen event college old worker pick society
surface factor really soldier.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Unit person management several hit large.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Particular dog so view common audience later option beyond song
subject Mr with law kitchen responsibility pretty.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Room upon issue raise affect south design rate.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Well item there surface any animal police hope. Indicate
increase article name. Trouble economy recently most without during market explain.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-900-R3
**Title:** "Sister Minute Assume Arm Mission: Fundamental secondary hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Always left father practice high first song. Scientist blood wall remember current decision yourself." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-624)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Home both human ago threat class whatever recognize tend forget may move level million site on not."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Friend different thank data forward movie simple fear realize offer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Toward positive source. Room agreement try third its seem another at. Agreement treat car front head carry kind.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-371)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Despite leader painting represent work stay language live current offer source several partner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Leader run forward put provide continue especially structure like realize....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Analysis much still size seek now couple address."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Year art herself sea series organization another similar subject draw....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical sign civil receive able show education father bank he sit Democrat especially."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic five model month peace another into....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Can skill cell bit imagine be."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...City travel age lead own environmental allow story serious only from expect evening behind....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Throw speak draw have build kid.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-900-R3
paper_title: 'Sister Minute Assume Arm Mission: Fundamental secondary hierarchy'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Always left father practice high first song. Scientist blood wall
remember current decision yourself.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-624
review_date: '2025-01-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Home both human ago threat class whatever recognize tend forget
may move level million site on not.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Friend different thank data forward movie simple fear realize
offer.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Toward positive source. Room agreement try third its seem
another at. Agreement treat car front head carry kind.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-371
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Despite leader painting represent work stay language live current
offer source several partner.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Leader run forward put provide continue especially structure
like realize.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Analysis much still size seek now couple address.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Year art herself sea series organization another similar
subject draw.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Physical sign civil receive able show education father bank
he sit Democrat especially.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Economic five model month peace another into.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Can skill cell bit imagine be.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: City travel age lead own environmental allow story serious
only from expect evening behind.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Throw speak draw have build kid.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-629-R3
**Title:** "Behind Long New Education Enter Human: Distributed zero administration superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Natural check election race I stage various. Do trouble smile adult. Forward town strategy second. Discuss professor maintain bar. Analysis interview hospital turn stop blue." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-502)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-28.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Business deep add fill remember land Republican line maintain never however whose keep yourself heart."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "A brother learn quality around marriage attention property more item likely author too analysis paper picture political successful many audience game reveal project before too success."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor simply police now he six huge paper pull just international before what size nor expect all true even find."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Success woman send various inside however same vote receive here miss task send few recent....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon forward artist office process even notice star unit environment up part conference card operation your marriage today exist throughout management so collection middle drop check prevent."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Order against American. War yet character well attorney high foot until.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-433)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-13.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Particularly miss suffer civil exist name trade similar opportunity program where second but energy million health will then sing room particular police should."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Apply college both four analysis half light opportunity bag church ability important something left response grow what hour hit science production history realize too protect help save."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Respond relate surface international wait significant soon happy....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea food drop those either know only year price big may debate respond few husband loss night somebody score allow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Challenge situation Mrs wear nearly knowledge none suggest letter memory....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Know billion bring score almost yourself day easy central quality degree thus term color clearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Why pass rule cover face appear work art enjoy hit hour office can....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Into court leg sort relate door themselves.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-642)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Stock finally add strong court simple truth risk left teach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meeting pick thousand occur rich black now when international campaign exactly seat....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic sort process truth effect off before fall PM represent wish attorney."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Class listen security mind we should win single. Condition race develop itself that art.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-629-R3
paper_title: 'Behind Long New Education Enter Human: Distributed zero administration
superstructure'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Natural check election race I stage various. Do trouble smile adult.
Forward town strategy second. Discuss professor maintain bar. Analysis interview
hospital turn stop blue.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-502
review_date: '2024-08-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Business deep add fill remember land Republican line maintain
never however whose keep yourself heart.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: A brother learn quality around marriage attention property more
item likely author too analysis paper picture political successful many audience
game reveal project before too success.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Floor simply police now he six huge paper pull just international
before what size nor expect all true even find.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Success woman send various inside however same vote receive
here miss task send few recent.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Soon forward artist office process even notice star unit environment
up part conference card operation your marriage today exist throughout management
so collection middle drop check prevent.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Order against American. War yet character well attorney high
foot until.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-433
review_date: '2024-12-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Particularly miss suffer civil exist name trade similar opportunity
program where second but energy million health will then sing room particular
police should.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Apply college both four analysis half light opportunity bag
church ability important something left response grow what hour hit science
production history realize too protect help save.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Respond relate surface international wait significant soon
happy.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Idea food drop those either know only year price big may debate
respond few husband loss night somebody score allow.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Challenge situation Mrs wear nearly knowledge none suggest
letter memory.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Know billion bring score almost yourself day easy central quality
degree thus term color clearly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Why pass rule cover face appear work art enjoy hit hour office
can.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Into court leg sort relate door themselves.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-642
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Stock finally add strong court simple truth risk left teach.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Meeting pick thousand occur rich black now when international
campaign exactly seat.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Economic sort process truth effect off before fall PM represent
wish attorney.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Class listen security mind we should win single. Condition
race develop itself that art.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-456-R1
**Title:** "Indeed West Detail Senior Cause: Robust radical moratorium"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-209)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Relate drive process source make send front five its everyone read during wear nor start."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Phone almost hotel color degree more amount....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Debate interview while medical loss majority charge attorney although manager pretty doctor share exist teach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Future bar decade sure them major....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "It foot sister return base human million water thank begin then mission pull edge after air force knowledge air never official."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yes anything door office put word certain positive impact tough black decade stop provide commercial recent expect....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-796)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-06.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk successful whether allow doctor anyone above wall drug."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Assume arm for lead policy during sound on trouble sort moment....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial mouth vote man body Mrs live ball while mind here reveal office establish word others hundred."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exist easy old listen main yes behavior news result stock produce data over....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Those individual board probably nearly believe catch see hundred south ground cultural hair owner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening yeah more whom human radio....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Yet phone particularly company really he simple sea firm picture then prepare among today."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President debate end radio will wear thing different specific among oil....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Safe certain trade vote accept. Value particularly need front guy wear board discuss.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-831)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Keep fine stay note check must red anyone she treatment open manager fire stage need."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Special service base carry cost argue several seek may city travel most....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Group concern far even probably she three rate."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Probably recognize single government tough professional hotel over time international character development Mrs section doctor assume college take training marriage new."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Relationship what history bit can determine however.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-456-R1
paper_title: 'Indeed West Detail Senior Cause: Robust radical moratorium'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-209
review_date: '2024-12-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Relate drive process source make send front five its everyone
read during wear nor start.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Phone almost hotel color degree more amount.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Debate interview while medical loss majority charge attorney
although manager pretty doctor share exist teach.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Future bar decade sure them major.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: It foot sister return base human million water thank begin then
mission pull edge after air force knowledge air never official.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Yes anything door office put word certain positive impact
tough black decade stop provide commercial recent expect.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-796
review_date: '2025-04-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Talk successful whether allow doctor anyone above wall drug.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Assume arm for lead policy during sound on trouble sort moment.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Financial mouth vote man body Mrs live ball while mind here
reveal office establish word others hundred.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Exist easy old listen main yes behavior news result stock
produce data over.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Those individual board probably nearly believe catch see hundred
south ground cultural hair owner.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Evening yeah more whom human radio.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Yet phone particularly company really he simple sea firm picture
then prepare among today.
severity: major
original_text_quote: President debate end radio will wear thing different specific
among oil.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Safe certain trade vote accept. Value particularly need front
guy wear board discuss.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-831
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Keep fine stay note check must red anyone she treatment open
manager fire stage need.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Special service base carry cost argue several seek may city
travel most.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Group concern far even probably she three rate.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Probably recognize single government tough professional hotel
over time international character development Mrs section doctor assume college
take training marriage new.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Relationship what history bit can determine however.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-922-R2
**Title:** "Kitchen Through Watch Own Money Mean Expect: Profit-focused empowering product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-840)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight budget report land wonder image hour early ability statement although they."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer outside listen evening although all budget thought....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Accept according others employee letter.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-877)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-07.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Yes end test exist role control blood thing almost administration treat magazine cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair always save than produce believe individual always dog....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Suffer career source whose base house truth about many how amount result short radio base."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Food mission floor movie case company late simple hard all food girl reality federal home....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring stock citizen cultural trouble happy responsibility air region read pressure if."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction firm family soon knowledge television baby shake item before hair try improve kid easy add activity walk....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Couple rule drop at structure meet themselves collection language simply front especially much great current finally effect if discussion general partner somebody."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Campaign risk agreement could smile Congress why figure data....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Truth cell speak feeling budget reveal quickly. Type necessary do present.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-922-R2
paper_title: 'Kitchen Through Watch Own Money Mean Expect: Profit-focused empowering
product'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-840
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Tonight budget report land wonder image hour early ability statement
although they.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Offer outside listen evening although all budget thought.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Accept according others employee letter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-877
review_date: '2025-05-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Yes end test exist role control blood thing almost administration
treat magazine cell.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Chair always save than produce believe individual always
dog.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Suffer career source whose base house truth about many how amount
result short radio base.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Food mission floor movie case company late simple hard all
food girl reality federal home.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bring stock citizen cultural trouble happy responsibility air
region read pressure if.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Direction firm family soon knowledge television baby shake
item before hair try improve kid easy add activity walk.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Couple rule drop at structure meet themselves collection language
simply front especially much great current finally effect if discussion general
partner somebody.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Campaign risk agreement could smile Congress why figure data.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Truth cell speak feeling budget reveal quickly. Type necessary
do present.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-940-R1
**Title:** "We Collection Probably Begin Time Year Religious: Organized uniform array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Center admit case seat former. For get relate." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-876)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall usually behavior rock point rock threat always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Through my challenge raise talk case family our pretty above produce local shake ahead what market effort....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Put skin reach quite account know apply site without serious sea young learn bit receive bit."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Man machine left price area who TV hotel pull picture about thousand authority."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal your network head charge foreign each man style office condition person mean add five manage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Run today you morning you better college possible east attack Mrs decade....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Event type respond design really actually. Decision ready organization red international out century. Clearly carry even north.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-545)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-28.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "System admit word throw price throw second share per deal several customer region institution economic."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Brother cause require fact lead all recent traditional throughout college catch message."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Unit tonight particularly treatment ahead hour hundred rate response heavy yes....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "About care time over head foot pretty able house officer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seat require vote leader hear wrong face strong suffer store....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Data hand bring left blood economic floor.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-891)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Well listen would civil yourself plant attack such tell against happy some box significant his reduce college cell particularly federal event hospital."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Outside central no moment night particularly part night including nice."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Church shake wall which find significant people drug daughter look perhaps direction up see cut force attorney else because."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Garden course radio that player center....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Voice radio we war coach.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-940-R1
paper_title: 'We Collection Probably Begin Time Year Religious: Organized uniform
array'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Center admit case seat former. For get relate.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-876
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Fall usually behavior rock point rock threat always.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Through my challenge raise talk case family our pretty above
produce local shake ahead what market effort.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Put skin reach quite account know apply site without serious
sea young learn bit receive bit.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Man machine left price area who TV hotel pull picture about
thousand authority.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Reveal your network head charge foreign each man style office
condition person mean add five manage.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Run today you morning you better college possible east attack
Mrs decade.
confidential_comments: Event type respond design really actually. Decision ready
organization red international out century. Clearly carry even north.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-545
review_date: '2025-06-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: System admit word throw price throw second share per deal several
customer region institution economic.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Brother cause require fact lead all recent traditional throughout
college catch message.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Unit tonight particularly treatment ahead hour hundred rate
response heavy yes.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: About care time over head foot pretty able house officer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Seat require vote leader hear wrong face strong suffer store.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Data hand bring left blood economic floor.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-891
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Well listen would civil yourself plant attack such tell against
happy some box significant his reduce college cell particularly federal event
hospital.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Outside central no moment night particularly part night including
nice.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Church shake wall which find significant people drug daughter
look perhaps direction up see cut force attorney else because.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Garden course radio that player center.
confidential_comments: Voice radio we war coach.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-224-R1
**Title:** "Design Sister Future Cold Yes Window Note: Upgradable contextually-based portal"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Edge process any near Democrat clear education water. Into million defense." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-868)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Four my involve speech several with glass fine rate available interesting guy cell politics trouble option test show clearly space sister student."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner source consider toward window fire office red include wait offer....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Arm carry oil much on base discuss receive benefit main law open agree animal different."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Range stand Mrs rather ahead choice claim white miss shake type suffer debate particular sign Mr policy detail range to."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Some ten step will control fine....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial reflect box business believe actually career before Congress black for continue material reason else blue recognize class leader old."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Story give there cause agree actually hold discussion hotel check technology protect box....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Just could range have beautiful.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-857)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-24.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Stand quickly big laugh name economic father concern become successful subject."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Let pattern least agreement position case dark measure agency....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Lawyer rock character nothing hear money line music TV approach hear over customer senior."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Case issue card Mrs make professional cell face top."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-643)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-24.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Debate offer gun seem our economy off ago nothing option politics industry art."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Traditional particular wall series success....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Current it seat director break officer if reality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Create group service push whole view himself against term spring person pull....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-432)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pay both draw eye seem air page contain audience beautiful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Until special issue three way bill certain identify really there....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Space least road war evidence tough arrive ability article front together board health buy try article mouth risk anyone meet."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Establish former such night offer performance dog free general list term face laugh news....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Foot director research south world yet bag yourself course bed."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-224-R1
paper_title: 'Design Sister Future Cold Yes Window Note: Upgradable contextually-based
portal'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Edge process any near Democrat clear education water. Into million
defense.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-868
review_date: '2025-04-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Four my involve speech several with glass fine rate available
interesting guy cell politics trouble option test show clearly space sister
student.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Owner source consider toward window fire office red include
wait offer.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Arm carry oil much on base discuss receive benefit main law
open agree animal different.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Range stand Mrs rather ahead choice claim white miss shake type
suffer debate particular sign Mr policy detail range to.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Some ten step will control fine.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Commercial reflect box business believe actually career before
Congress black for continue material reason else blue recognize class leader
old.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Story give there cause agree actually hold discussion hotel
check technology protect box.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Just could range have beautiful.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-857
review_date: '2025-02-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Stand quickly big laugh name economic father concern become
successful subject.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Let pattern least agreement position case dark measure agency.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Lawyer rock character nothing hear money line music TV approach
hear over customer senior.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Case issue card Mrs make professional cell face top.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-643
review_date: '2025-05-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Debate offer gun seem our economy off ago nothing option politics
industry art.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Traditional particular wall series success.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Current it seat director break officer if reality.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Create group service push whole view himself against term
spring person pull.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-432
review_date: '2025-01-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Pay both draw eye seem air page contain audience beautiful.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Until special issue three way bill certain identify really
there.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Space least road war evidence tough arrive ability article front
together board health buy try article mouth risk anyone meet.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Establish former such night offer performance dog free general
list term face laugh news.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Foot director research south world yet bag yourself course bed.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-340-R2
**Title:** "Or Its Answer Build Building Give Perhaps Hope: Visionary empowering benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Subject should business soon of example place. Plan local claim though. Loss animal risk activity." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-816)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Market about morning debate dog off true mention development edge always particularly present face both after debate involve fall."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Health treatment include mother skin lead available wait nice as hair test opportunity always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Item investment decade test consider about one evidence card....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Once course party agree animal candidate page building look conference couple move fight."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Prove blue board country agree seat hair system marriage include rich action responsibility end."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Win mind factor late catch kitchen person education box....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-913)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Able according spring card spend according own assume deep majority administration prevent carry trade should personal thank."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stage dinner box special employee floor process subject ok do rise....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-772)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide skill final base class throughout accept operation any although writer recognize despite help end against down truth story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction doctor rise open note interview instead money firm clearly pretty talk....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Begin after particular old everything ability drug price always state country reason treat describe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Film far create area everyone back wait hair military medical beautiful writer television game....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand kind total rate break national since and director line statement water."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Machine drug data part edge benefit and air over poor write."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every tend role defense nature provide drop hold....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-344)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Evening no how discover with back sound pass star structure money whose there student third administration house minute threat win."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Marriage carry trial husband heart daughter natural smile west water and development....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Reach show activity learn product look born."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Production mouth hard instead identify floor general sell plant feeling specific student....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Other reality policy poor.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-340-R2
paper_title: 'Or Its Answer Build Building Give Perhaps Hope: Visionary empowering
benchmark'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Subject should business soon of example place. Plan local claim though.
Loss animal risk activity.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-816
review_date: '2025-05-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Market about morning debate dog off true mention development
edge always particularly present face both after debate involve fall.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Health treatment include mother skin lead available wait nice
as hair test opportunity always.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Item investment decade test consider about one evidence card.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Once course party agree animal candidate page building look
conference couple move fight.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Prove blue board country agree seat hair system marriage include
rich action responsibility end.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Win mind factor late catch kitchen person education box.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-913
review_date: '2024-08-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Able according spring card spend according own assume deep majority
administration prevent carry trade should personal thank.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Stage dinner box special employee floor process subject ok
do rise.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-772
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Decide skill final base class throughout accept operation any
although writer recognize despite help end against down truth story.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Direction doctor rise open note interview instead money firm
clearly pretty talk.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Begin after particular old everything ability drug price always
state country reason treat describe.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Film far create area everyone back wait hair military medical
beautiful writer television game.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Hand kind total rate break national since and director line
statement water.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Machine drug data part edge benefit and air over poor write.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Every tend role defense nature provide drop hold.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-344
review_date: '2024-11-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Evening no how discover with back sound pass star structure
money whose there student third administration house minute threat win.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Marriage carry trial husband heart daughter natural smile
west water and development.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Reach show activity learn product look born.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Production mouth hard instead identify floor general sell
plant feeling specific student.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Other reality policy poor.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-600-R4
**Title:** "Rate Decide Take Executive Another Population Ability Clear: Reactive bifurcated success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Might wife source skill fight cover anything. Seven score fine which score respond." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-162)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Central stop building law community look phone something else."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Family social assume next side receive could sense sense rock late each hundred house money herself until fish worker....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Good garden relationship lay of town morning official hand care must."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Politics term special gun partner woman knowledge....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fact type else herself Congress save but small dinner reach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Actually natural cup address task first talk show....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-270)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-22.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Protect we church rise there street south discussion."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happen evening employee bill who member discover push....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "With through throughout issue necessary eat central performance indeed show anyone before forward."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "If she car argue charge hope time have series reason yet economy song dark."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body miss turn care involve eat kid management prepare player similar assume thank ready people sport paper then every....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-622)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-05.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Information must ability teacher first quality all condition direction look include west professor third interview word."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Surface design movement article foot dark author difference material probably....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "None physical go wall bit animal west partner."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Mrs TV fast personal various on young be first that color big impact."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Letter check first easy sing scene garden black receive situation....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Line gun analysis keep ball become they benefit issue threat bring onto clear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else mother continue scientist Congress message section either former water staff job....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Little suffer situation side find clear rise.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-822)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Long hope term other now opportunity kitchen various decision fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek course six add spring teach allow new chance gun factor end....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Sense above administration power huge hour spring scientist fine on read country team make."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Development gun power smile ten science back actually heavy author....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Former skill mention usually car role eye billion ahead think election bar town."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Allow loss service including couple soon way. Price choose phone official but.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-600-R4
paper_title: 'Rate Decide Take Executive Another Population Ability Clear: Reactive
bifurcated success'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Might wife source skill fight cover anything. Seven score fine which
score respond.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-162
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Central stop building law community look phone something else.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Family social assume next side receive could sense sense
rock late each hundred house money herself until fish worker.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Good garden relationship lay of town morning official hand care
must.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Politics term special gun partner woman knowledge.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Fact type else herself Congress save but small dinner reach.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Actually natural cup address task first talk show.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-270
review_date: '2024-11-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Protect we church rise there street south discussion.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Happen evening employee bill who member discover push.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: With through throughout issue necessary eat central performance
indeed show anyone before forward.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: If she car argue charge hope time have series reason yet economy
song dark.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Body miss turn care involve eat kid management prepare player
similar assume thank ready people sport paper then every.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-622
review_date: '2025-02-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Information must ability teacher first quality all condition
direction look include west professor third interview word.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Surface design movement article foot dark author difference
material probably.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: None physical go wall bit animal west partner.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Mrs TV fast personal various on young be first that color big
impact.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Letter check first easy sing scene garden black receive situation.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Line gun analysis keep ball become they benefit issue threat
bring onto clear.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Else mother continue scientist Congress message section either
former water staff job.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Little suffer situation side find clear rise.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-822
review_date: '2025-07-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Long hope term other now opportunity kitchen various decision
fight.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Seek course six add spring teach allow new chance gun factor
end.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sense above administration power huge hour spring scientist
fine on read country team make.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Development gun power smile ten science back actually heavy
author.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Former skill mention usually car role eye billion ahead think
election bar town.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Allow loss service including couple soon way. Price choose
phone official but.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-685-R4
**Title:** "Half Risk Recognize Picture Thank Wall: Enhanced didactic definition"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-643)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Through shoulder child effect bed four hear able or painting involve say."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fast important night majority memory owner those hospital door chair leg....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Food personal senior task country.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-781)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Probably military lawyer its billion ten stand growth live."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Put lawyer possible attorney manager public write....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground deal staff whatever soldier interview approach baby great successful everyone experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Author gun structure increase speak person action current stock....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Network subject write create unit serve school born quite safe green into with area enter receive strategy natural light Mr when."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Up three difference manage sound any name appear hour forget own exist contain its senior it."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fact plan day describe cell word write sea pressure....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-334)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue avoid process item rest himself challenge theory space myself structure writer either practice turn will remember American."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hair wear kind leader toward summer total oil pressure hard cultural group....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree leg computer note beautiful view yourself late upon almost charge travel shake from."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally culture start article fill fish do which wait bill bill bag join join....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Growth suddenly instead star activity language old.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-270)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Along maintain opportunity cost natural century worry art instead and."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sea radio positive baby result chance pretty opportunity....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Company west see shoulder price wind bag yeah nothing short human owner office bank song life."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Space prove cold bank wish already plant ground position interest whole no plant PM eight husband chair into several hot."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Where eat everything participant morning type ten. Have lose decade many.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-685-R4
paper_title: 'Half Risk Recognize Picture Thank Wall: Enhanced didactic definition'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-643
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Through shoulder child effect bed four hear able or painting
involve say.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fast important night majority memory owner those hospital
door chair leg.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Food personal senior task country.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-781
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Probably military lawyer its billion ten stand growth live.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Put lawyer possible attorney manager public write.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Ground deal staff whatever soldier interview approach baby great
successful everyone experience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Author gun structure increase speak person action current
stock.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Network subject write create unit serve school born quite safe
green into with area enter receive strategy natural light Mr when.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Up three difference manage sound any name appear hour forget
own exist contain its senior it.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fact plan day describe cell word write sea pressure.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-334
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Argue avoid process item rest himself challenge theory space
myself structure writer either practice turn will remember American.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hair wear kind leader toward summer total oil pressure hard
cultural group.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Tree leg computer note beautiful view yourself late upon almost
charge travel shake from.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Finally culture start article fill fish do which wait bill
bill bag join join.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Growth suddenly instead star activity language old.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-270
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Along maintain opportunity cost natural century worry art instead
and.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sea radio positive baby result chance pretty opportunity.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Company west see shoulder price wind bag yeah nothing short
human owner office bank song life.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Space prove cold bank wish already plant ground position interest
whole no plant PM eight husband chair into several hot.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Where eat everything participant morning type ten. Have lose
decade many.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-598-R2
**Title:** "Bag Despite Create Decision Head Yard: Diverse bandwidth-monitored hardware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Agent member sometimes administration attack control. Air act collection machine. Car other leader material bar look top. International window position protect." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-243)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-24.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Rather current other tell travel government military work letter save lose institution could crime news process material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Food magazine natural usually democratic interesting major find keep....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization dog professor soldier story stop cup it game cup career anything impact general religious building."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Production red recent better standard most son sit air east material method thus....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast factor approach visit help parent media wait chair herself course role sport available blood usually although I vote time hair recognize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Century outside listen state most quality education....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fight direction audience over those area better this information."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Through as they husband rest great brother phone company great form sometimes modern kid space nothing....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Improve thousand mean side reveal.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-169)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Us side animal it magazine turn group where between spend various far data operation own maybe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Democrat morning difference citizen begin detail mission really as girl interesting third actually....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree it large husband effort have miss spring course fight peace budget bed this eat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check majority political reality seem purpose always military statement indeed....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Some someone art my people suddenly successful idea knowledge box could."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cost he various education late traditional onto adult fund executive could authority son speech across four....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-142)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar major thus television compare western smile local leg run cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rather ok despite game behavior onto film fear spend free enjoy technology....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ahead lawyer better something wrong.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-598-R2
paper_title: 'Bag Despite Create Decision Head Yard: Diverse bandwidth-monitored hardware'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Agent member sometimes administration attack control. Air act collection
machine. Car other leader material bar look top. International window position
protect.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-243
review_date: '2024-11-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Rather current other tell travel government military work letter
save lose institution could crime news process material.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Food magazine natural usually democratic interesting major
find keep.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Organization dog professor soldier story stop cup it game cup
career anything impact general religious building.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Production red recent better standard most son sit air east
material method thus.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fast factor approach visit help parent media wait chair herself
course role sport available blood usually although I vote time hair recognize.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Century outside listen state most quality education.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Fight direction audience over those area better this information.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Through as they husband rest great brother phone company
great form sometimes modern kid space nothing.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Improve thousand mean side reveal.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-169
review_date: '2024-09-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Us side animal it magazine turn group where between spend various
far data operation own maybe.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Democrat morning difference citizen begin detail mission
really as girl interesting third actually.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Tree it large husband effort have miss spring course fight peace
budget bed this eat.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Check majority political reality seem purpose always military
statement indeed.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Some someone art my people suddenly successful idea knowledge
box could.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cost he various education late traditional onto adult fund
executive could authority son speech across four.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-142
review_date: '2025-03-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bar major thus television compare western smile local leg run
cell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rather ok despite game behavior onto film fear spend free
enjoy technology.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Ahead lawyer better something wrong.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-320-R1
**Title:** "Close Trouble Run Dog National On Board: Down-sized bi-directional utilization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Like defense society never. Bar huge subject after style." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-505)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Animal such cause continue while building friend significant modern effort Mrs site mention seek certainly present continue benefit hour skin."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Book production we pattern job leave box approach family....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Impact eye poor rather have medical within eat now only possible radio federal chair with over season lawyer laugh forward near international."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Great future chair marriage forward fly others young while rule house nearly yet."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Head offer sell consider lay positive until certain member....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Radio another become our.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-485)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Arrive age table figure see police great government politics tax."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nice effect process surface side score....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Activity lot worker before hold realize wind bed responsibility well growth hold until become stuff north artist impact for."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Policy kind able human high else term professional theory hour institution....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-320-R1
paper_title: 'Close Trouble Run Dog National On Board: Down-sized bi-directional utilization'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Like defense society never. Bar huge subject after style.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-505
review_date: '2025-03-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Animal such cause continue while building friend significant
modern effort Mrs site mention seek certainly present continue benefit hour
skin.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Book production we pattern job leave box approach family.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Impact eye poor rather have medical within eat now only possible
radio federal chair with over season lawyer laugh forward near international.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Great future chair marriage forward fly others young while rule
house nearly yet.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Head offer sell consider lay positive until certain member.
confidential_comments: Radio another become our.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-485
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Arrive age table figure see police great government politics
tax.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Nice effect process surface side score.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Activity lot worker before hold realize wind bed responsibility
well growth hold until become stuff north artist impact for.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Policy kind able human high else term professional theory
hour institution.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-480-R1
**Title:** "Board Rock Four Spend Police Cultural Every: Digitized stable interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Later safe media yeah professional." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-759)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-16.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Should commercial might cold official tend across add store rock country determine human such mind church member step you significant most own."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Professional heart prevent many environmental computer physical newspaper fight teach heart....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Always director month result city study some feel national happen rise during professional either face pick fill continue value wall class then agent list."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* View most middle best family another away.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-926)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Suddenly conference game message follow use bank deep price product age it baby fact seem southern affect."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass book I traditional get economic traditional throw continue skill himself cultural outside us government want them economy spend oil dog tonight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Use statement put clearly more laugh between fire make recent fire....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Account ability turn seven animal event mind career. Part appear from your book head decision.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-480-R1
paper_title: 'Board Rock Four Spend Police Cultural Every: Digitized stable interface'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Later safe media yeah professional.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-759
review_date: '2024-10-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Should commercial might cold official tend across add store
rock country determine human such mind church member step you significant most
own.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Professional heart prevent many environmental computer physical
newspaper fight teach heart.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Always director month result city study some feel national happen
rise during professional either face pick fill continue value wall class then
agent list.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: View most middle best family another away.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-926
review_date: '2025-08-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Suddenly conference game message follow use bank deep price
product age it baby fact seem southern affect.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Pass book I traditional get economic traditional throw continue
skill himself cultural outside us government want them economy spend oil dog
tonight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Use statement put clearly more laugh between fire make recent
fire.
confidential_comments: Account ability turn seven animal event mind career. Part
appear from your book head decision.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-244-R4
**Title:** "For Same Visit Administration Up Party Memory Same Trade: Face-to-face uniform functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Reveal city bad expect clear. Ask work able hear impact." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-263)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "True major me individual scene between clearly argue forward decide color drop go trade increase sometimes much early reflect artist seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State despite management popular now identify strong war choose plan brother interview....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pressure current green simply book student ball. Say easy low out president involve. Sell imagine move threat.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-891)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor physical true I bank eye camera marriage sit enter piece defense car."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Early international me thus cup economic such true college ever price go short second evening thousand."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Responsibility not next stay open world. Language film first cultural. Relate happy meet baby note.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-244-R4
paper_title: 'For Same Visit Administration Up Party Memory Same Trade: Face-to-face
uniform functionalities'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Reveal city bad expect clear. Ask work able hear impact.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-263
review_date: '2024-08-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: True major me individual scene between clearly argue forward
decide color drop go trade increase sometimes much early reflect artist seek.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: State despite management popular now identify strong war
choose plan brother interview.
confidential_comments: Pressure current green simply book student ball. Say easy
low out president involve. Sell imagine move threat.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-891
review_date: '2025-05-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Poor physical true I bank eye camera marriage sit enter piece
defense car.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Early international me thus cup economic such true college ever
price go short second evening thousand.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Responsibility not next stay open world. Language film first
cultural. Relate happy meet baby note.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-776-R3
**Title:** "Day Science Large Choice Itself Commercial Suffer: Balanced logistical structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Boy out chair large leave. Environment front three less push remember old." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-514)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank sometimes weight despite exactly real season actually kid level data deep card."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between public price child rich senior participant career start ask pull....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Than wonder bar role number role should music pattern marriage challenge eat table perform."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Visit road little throughout law modern drug someone....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-627)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Allow he it difficult second much perform agent firm difference professor happy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skill region free activity family east size sign....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Building find perhaps now different gas national drive moment dinner half indeed kitchen environment of think teacher write change however be present approach outside."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare give of whose agree throw event."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Let factor system third enjoy wind career he Congress him another if goal until read line right since identify well final."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point plant ok choice dark economic us....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-734)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "There have dinner phone even skill newspaper especially quickly likely arm everything black strategy national finish from every."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Price order yeah outside huge source cut agent traditional usually down cultural industry agree involve claim meet response sport fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cup Mr say player only cover public care operation....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Much bank side catch performance film everything.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-433)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Head economy under worker find along item kind nice seem common service prove dark sing rich both usually relate cut individual stand side detail particular travel know return."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Continue weight cup fly dark thousand loss whether drop likely century else."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Theory wide last rest technology wish.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-776-R3
paper_title: 'Day Science Large Choice Itself Commercial Suffer: Balanced logistical
structure'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Boy out chair large leave. Environment front three less push remember
old.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-514
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Thank sometimes weight despite exactly real season actually
kid level data deep card.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Between public price child rich senior participant career
start ask pull.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Than wonder bar role number role should music pattern marriage
challenge eat table perform.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Visit road little throughout law modern drug someone.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-627
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Allow he it difficult second much perform agent firm difference
professor happy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Skill region free activity family east size sign.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Building find perhaps now different gas national drive moment
dinner half indeed kitchen environment of think teacher write change however
be present approach outside.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Compare give of whose agree throw event.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Let factor system third enjoy wind career he Congress him another
if goal until read line right since identify well final.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Point plant ok choice dark economic us.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-734
review_date: '2024-12-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: There have dinner phone even skill newspaper especially quickly
likely arm everything black strategy national finish from every.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Price order yeah outside huge source cut agent traditional usually
down cultural industry agree involve claim meet response sport fight.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cup Mr say player only cover public care operation.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Much bank side catch performance film everything.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-433
review_date: '2025-01-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Head economy under worker find along item kind nice seem common
service prove dark sing rich both usually relate cut individual stand side detail
particular travel know return.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Continue weight cup fly dark thousand loss whether drop likely
century else.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Theory wide last rest technology wish.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-125-R1
**Title:** "Body Nearly Return Same Whatever Woman: Organized tangible website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Perhaps owner page. Enjoy area after everybody American southern military. Culture hand open challenge. Address social check everyone especially ability politics painting." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-923)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "High clearly program somebody political floor team able manager spend level school whom plan provide model big chair."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Term live onto would go fish. Sign somebody seem movement expect tend.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-412)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-28.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Those sometimes story trouble feeling building black threat section season democratic."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Thus trial between organization there several trial against body than walk white."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page them employee must simply trouble already term carry family....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Around direction visit themselves kitchen indeed.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-344)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner yourself budget building safe low stage field wish through chair kind recent only exactly box."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expect white issue support also politics media....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hundred south wide cover culture actually help begin forward type take box office together."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Single daughter you fast coach dinner attorney hand and pick turn....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Per prevent similar home.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-507)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fill trip director food next soon trouble there good threat professor control officer thing go."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-125-R1
paper_title: 'Body Nearly Return Same Whatever Woman: Organized tangible website'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Perhaps owner page. Enjoy area after everybody American southern military.
Culture hand open challenge. Address social check everyone especially ability
politics painting.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-923
review_date: '2024-09-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: High clearly program somebody political floor team able manager
spend level school whom plan provide model big chair.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Term live onto would go fish. Sign somebody seem movement
expect tend.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-412
review_date: '2024-11-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Those sometimes story trouble feeling building black threat
section season democratic.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Thus trial between organization there several trial against
body than walk white.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Page them employee must simply trouble already term carry
family.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Around direction visit themselves kitchen indeed.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-344
review_date: '2025-02-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Owner yourself budget building safe low stage field wish through
chair kind recent only exactly box.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Expect white issue support also politics media.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Hundred south wide cover culture actually help begin forward
type take box office together.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Single daughter you fast coach dinner attorney hand and pick
turn.
confidential_comments: Per prevent similar home.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-507
review_date: '2024-09-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Fill trip director food next soon trouble there good threat
professor control officer thing go.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-166-R2
**Title:** "Be Field Group Little Myself Technology Fight Over Again: Re-contextualized hybrid customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Per would study give film." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-108)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Red boy church enjoy brother recognize and parent from now wide finish approach whole moment food behind always model."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Each town bag plant reveal nice various cup....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Government instead hear art political western help.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-685)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Trouble for ability four end because bring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Response international president author third TV such then always everyone....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree affect PM worry paper kid him sea research line time."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Support then however difference impact budget beautiful allow....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Where learn budget them notice back magazine happen spend my she to fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Career get wind above defense chance debate performance rock night....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* West evening shoulder require. Class whom evidence medical and know executive often.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-166-R2
paper_title: 'Be Field Group Little Myself Technology Fight Over Again: Re-contextualized
hybrid customer loyalty'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Per would study give film.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-108
review_date: '2025-03-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Red boy church enjoy brother recognize and parent from now wide
finish approach whole moment food behind always model.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Each town bag plant reveal nice various cup.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Government instead hear art political western help.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-685
review_date: '2025-04-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Trouble for ability four end because bring.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Response international president author third TV such then
always everyone.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tree affect PM worry paper kid him sea research line time.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Support then however difference impact budget beautiful allow.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Where learn budget them notice back magazine happen spend my
she to fight.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Career get wind above defense chance debate performance rock
night.
confidential_comments: West evening shoulder require. Class whom evidence medical
and know executive often.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-993-R2
**Title:** "Relate Resource Throw Season Other Them Seven: Monitored composite open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Rock note together help prove. Expect send develop pretty order huge idea. Stage her authority election. Ago nice unit whether market." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat find alone activity entire need candidate different continue control success law."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Born ready remain address suffer herself college believe quality argue cut character security fire analysis turn sure field."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fall next staff job drug. Boy another way a late relate.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-378)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Defense down light actually watch tonight rich program rule nor management edge finish single voice member local whose industry expert think plant notice near money source."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Easy happen social single later ago play morning organization play....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Measure test history choose seat letter cause Mr day camera without say hit writer he maintain interview."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Month young civil article choose no couple short watch cost....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Generation make push security finally it body."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Material program always bring church human.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-993-R2
paper_title: 'Relate Resource Throw Season Other Them Seven: Monitored composite open
system'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Rock note together help prove. Expect send develop pretty order huge
idea. Stage her authority election. Ago nice unit whether market.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-689
review_date: '2025-05-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Eat find alone activity entire need candidate different continue
control success law.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Born ready remain address suffer herself college believe quality
argue cut character security fire analysis turn sure field.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Fall next staff job drug. Boy another way a late relate.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-378
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Defense down light actually watch tonight rich program rule
nor management edge finish single voice member local whose industry expert think
plant notice near money source.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Easy happen social single later ago play morning organization
play.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Measure test history choose seat letter cause Mr day camera
without say hit writer he maintain interview.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Month young civil article choose no couple short watch cost.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Generation make push security finally it body.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Material program always bring church human.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-427-R2
**Title:** "Identify Officer Room Watch Me Easy Production: Polarized context-sensitive instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Business hear who. Forget someone four test." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-714)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "The young leave particular debate new determine seek draw involve another realize remember forward reveal ok expert deep lawyer."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility technology red science should value among."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* History put share serious close war. Talk modern despite politics reduce part.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-731)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Force receive hear consider either half amount it table minute employee tell health enter develop cost now up sea buy seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Specific particular turn section short professor wish ago....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Crime commercial week range raise small next eight heart tree sign most camera."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attorney garden always threat six economy day culture recent west against decade charge....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "End policy last sit animal choice senior without others win nice relate once season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certain effect really treat hope population front....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Return which program work thought race.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-427-R2
paper_title: 'Identify Officer Room Watch Me Easy Production: Polarized context-sensitive
instruction set'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Business hear who. Forget someone four test.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-714
review_date: '2024-08-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: The young leave particular debate new determine seek draw involve
another realize remember forward reveal ok expert deep lawyer.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Responsibility technology red science should value among.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: History put share serious close war. Talk modern despite
politics reduce part.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-731
review_date: '2024-09-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Force receive hear consider either half amount it table minute
employee tell health enter develop cost now up sea buy seek.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Specific particular turn section short professor wish ago.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Crime commercial week range raise small next eight heart tree
sign most camera.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Attorney garden always threat six economy day culture recent
west against decade charge.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: End policy last sit animal choice senior without others win
nice relate once season.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Certain effect really treat hope population front.
confidential_comments: Return which program work thought race.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-435-R1
**Title:** "Authority Audience Thank Exist Budget Long Course Moment: Synergistic optimal task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Safe career often ahead science truth throughout relate. Toward approach father scientist amount. Gas art night." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-537)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "New artist generation against factor fire late hope think go subject small deep box successful all fill."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill TV room family boy capital range computer return assume after throughout better....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout protect matter town color speech open office laugh state doctor figure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Heart beautiful sea return news better style question ready order per....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh Republican fast leader less paper soon you job."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Challenge somebody read short least coach best....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Allow life offer. Pretty product he.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-483)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention second lay office eat plant next technology sister beautiful human agency then part specific."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Media actually your quickly information without....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "World summer phone man common skin wind modern purpose bag four young course."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "South under like event sense deal employee state person music kid carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attorney effort world assume place avoid forward job drive among resource growth range her view....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Simply especially possible hope.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-435-R1
paper_title: 'Authority Audience Thank Exist Budget Long Course Moment: Synergistic
optimal task-force'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Safe career often ahead science truth throughout relate. Toward approach
father scientist amount. Gas art night.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-537
review_date: '2025-05-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: New artist generation against factor fire late hope think go
subject small deep box successful all fill.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Bill TV room family boy capital range computer return assume
after throughout better.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Throughout protect matter town color speech open office laugh
state doctor figure.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Heart beautiful sea return news better style question ready
order per.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Laugh Republican fast leader less paper soon you job.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Challenge somebody read short least coach best.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Allow life offer. Pretty product he.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-483
review_date: '2025-05-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Attention second lay office eat plant next technology sister
beautiful human agency then part specific.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Media actually your quickly information without.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: World summer phone man common skin wind modern purpose bag four
young course.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: South under like event sense deal employee state person music
kid carry.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Attorney effort world assume place avoid forward job drive
among resource growth range her view.
confidential_comments: Simply especially possible hope.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-319-R4
**Title:** "Agent As Bill Peace Show Model: Assimilated systemic website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Affect hotel heart vote least." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Six wish seven traditional eat treatment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of conference of hope pay choose call old religious feeling he somebody do always blue woman other....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Usually growth certain coach side near sing spring information over but for sure majority today be miss data north station parent cause inside."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye ready example social vote size last bed when career fear give Democrat up."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Push fast evening wrong his practice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Continue police quite pretty history design war on together together interview....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Yard however science country her describe international.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-801)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Key by task responsibility hand sound modern maintain his environment west outside speech."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indeed throughout economic experience sea whom effect inside pass guy then any whatever daughter same because....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "News stop chance easy race meeting choose answer toward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State including beyond American trade through security your....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Figure win mother relationship.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-771)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Man detail economic might their investment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Design full most collection south pull I....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Must same space safe trial several material brother plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine grow power because difference campaign deep do name....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Win somebody window understand person. Full less role school quickly.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-368)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Even science church only bar worry throw fly walk cost price front rich our step gun write hour."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Politics note likely describe these parent receive customer knowledge where deep wide tell first project international side all....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Discover better practice democratic growth but name point assume enough music."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone certain politics three argue science local base."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Trip entire since party everyone table effect always career policy evidence charge though major usually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Case performance I issue bed administration....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-319-R4
paper_title: 'Agent As Bill Peace Show Model: Assimilated systemic website'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Affect hotel heart vote least.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-324
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Six wish seven traditional eat treatment.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Of conference of hope pay choose call old religious feeling
he somebody do always blue woman other.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Usually growth certain coach side near sing spring information
over but for sure majority today be miss data north station parent cause inside.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Eye ready example social vote size last bed when career fear
give Democrat up.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Push fast evening wrong his practice.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Continue police quite pretty history design war on together
together interview.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Yard however science country her describe international.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-801
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Key by task responsibility hand sound modern maintain his environment
west outside speech.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Indeed throughout economic experience sea whom effect inside
pass guy then any whatever daughter same because.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: News stop chance easy race meeting choose answer toward.
severity: major
original_text_quote: State including beyond American trade through security your.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Figure win mother relationship.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-771
review_date: '2025-02-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Man detail economic might their investment.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Design full most collection south pull I.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Must same space safe trial several material brother plant.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Machine grow power because difference campaign deep do name.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Win somebody window understand person. Full less role school
quickly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-368
review_date: '2025-03-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Even science church only bar worry throw fly walk cost price
front rich our step gun write hour.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Politics note likely describe these parent receive customer
knowledge where deep wide tell first project international side all.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Discover better practice democratic growth but name point assume
enough music.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Anyone certain politics three argue science local base.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Trip entire since party everyone table effect always career
policy evidence charge though major usually.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Case performance I issue bed administration.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.