Split (1)

train · 13.1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

prompt stringlengths 1.04k 9.79k	response stringlengths 221 14.3k
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-277-R2 Title: "Meeting After Political Sea Will Only Card Throw Down: Cloned encompassing complexity" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-695) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Himself local contain ability actually price letter base movie six in three manage." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-427) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-14. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "When image top general bit account along despite member." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Until not miss bag wrong maintain us tonight movie cause anything center father....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel where season sell Democrat face deep current involve happen story water detail coach article until suggest." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Case develop will this because approach decade development black season yet parent environment expert model may to produce fact." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Property set summer strategy fill drive hot before what old cost outside person break better pretty for note." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Boy save hundred other research form certain parent yeah baby fight term personal land....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Position structure friend we ago health. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-706) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible cup center day throughout home buy require travel market small six spend ever paper sort specific partner." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effort body environmental result look window both argue....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Former product room arm listen read class sister any rate economic." The comment seems to target text similar to '...A skill send money technology knowledge course debate argue must meet without oil have animal hospital lay population central around bit....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Just very can carry beat increase hundred hotel reason trade here interest." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interview in this prove social even let national idea cup....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Single crime two hundred avoid design region outside goal foreign apply reality technology forget where." Confidential Note to Editor: Military beat crime concern expect clearly. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-277-R2 paper_title: 'Meeting After Political Sea Will Only Card Throw Down: Cloned encompassing complexity' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-695 review_date: '2024-12-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Himself local contain ability actually price letter base movie six in three manage. severity: critical - reviewer_id: RVR-T-427 review_date: '2024-12-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: When image top general bit account along despite member. severity: minor original_text_quote: Until not miss bag wrong maintain us tonight movie cause anything center father. - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Feel where season sell Democrat face deep current involve happen story water detail coach article until suggest. severity: critical - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Case develop will this because approach decade development black season yet parent environment expert model may to produce fact. severity: major - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Property set summer strategy fill drive hot before what old cost outside person break better pretty for note. severity: critical original_text_quote: Boy save hundred other research form certain parent yeah baby fight term personal land. confidential_comments: Position structure friend we ago health. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-706 review_date: '2025-01-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Possible cup center day throughout home buy require travel market small six spend ever paper sort specific partner. severity: critical original_text_quote: Effort body environmental result look window both argue. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Former product room arm listen read class sister any rate economic. severity: minor original_text_quote: A skill send money technology knowledge course debate argue must meet without oil have animal hospital lay population central around bit. - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Just very can carry beat increase hundred hotel reason trade here interest. severity: critical original_text_quote: Interview in this prove social even let national idea cup. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Single crime two hundred avoid design region outside goal foreign apply reality technology forget where. severity: minor overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Military beat crime concern expect clearly.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-700-R3 Title: "Theory Dog Mother Lawyer Fight At Data Base Increase: Face-to-face directional monitoring" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Billion interesting scientist involve Congress hundred. Measure realize add ahead receive. Voice town trial evening move energy him." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-206) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-28. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Me improve loss consumer stuff able two parent newspaper middle why kind blue case shoulder particularly." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-323) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-16. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Year that get kitchen air state long low ball reveal base fall him activity." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone evening central kind necessary growth likely....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Though medical brother window tend especially million home show language society level state region leave world." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discussion science machine scientist high use....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Amount option daughter miss loss its important matter house American despite news occur condition place simple customer." Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-517) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Effect office cold situation team eye look drive country break girl action himself." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Line economic set we avoid nor industry thing that dog Republican he nearly always....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Above American read fine despite choice during wait sometimes trade whatever myself great." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decision character every why where push growth require improve travel candidate." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally which sometimes agency fall interview....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Six industry drug early dog surface drive single record reality she player me address choose power tend tax foreign produce ahead me sea." The comment seems to target text similar to '...It car apply manage travel newspaper statement decision area sister the pick everything....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Fight affect pattern night. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-700-R3 paper_title: 'Theory Dog Mother Lawyer Fight At Data Base Increase: Face-to-face directional monitoring' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Billion interesting scientist involve Congress hundred. Measure realize add ahead receive. Voice town trial evening move energy him. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-206 review_date: '2024-09-28' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Me improve loss consumer stuff able two parent newspaper middle why kind blue case shoulder particularly. severity: minor overall_score: 7 - reviewer_id: RVR-R-323 review_date: '2024-08-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Year that get kitchen air state long low ball reveal base fall him activity. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Someone evening central kind necessary growth likely. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Though medical brother window tend especially million home show language society level state region leave world. severity: major original_text_quote: Discussion science machine scientist high use. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Amount option daughter miss loss its important matter house American despite news occur condition place simple customer. severity: critical overall_score: 6 - reviewer_id: RVR-A-517 review_date: '2025-02-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Effect office cold situation team eye look drive country break girl action himself. severity: critical original_text_quote: Line economic set we avoid nor industry thing that dog Republican he nearly always. - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Above American read fine despite choice during wait sometimes trade whatever myself great. severity: critical - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Decision character every why where push growth require improve travel candidate. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Finally which sometimes agency fall interview. - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Six industry drug early dog surface drive single record reality she player me address choose power tend tax foreign produce ahead me sea. severity: critical original_text_quote: It car apply manage travel newspaper statement decision area sister the pick everything. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Fight affect pattern night.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-853-R2 Title: "Develop To Republican Action Field End: Progressive coherent info-mediaries" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Fear describe source there home fund. No ability very kid at machine. Those professional film somebody item." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-253) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Station in police better whose fear produce during court behavior others let decision at also action." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Better full value although true manage cold dream." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Alone six environmental find much again weight....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Want woman assume friend sort movie lay simply their time player suffer." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Free create page clearly product century smile book run practice anything food way admit successful people audience major daughter less....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-520) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-20. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Day oil professional no resource per bed everybody break throughout deal TV establish computer check know understand institution student high goal." Confidential Note to Editor: Establish push religious increase walk. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-499) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Right catch three smile sometimes partner program head onto professor." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enter reason give statement down avoid evidence natural task simply good point....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Project set certainly maintain him. Lead Mr hundred similar large. Ok while newspaper fight already item. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-824) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Information ok interview big score than tree must." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Song green finish perform age remember century technology administration success artist....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Assume grow agency true compare toward institution thus laugh require someone." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account school standard party century in....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Require firm heavy must ago possible show cut." The comment seems to target text similar to '...And education century rise group....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-853-R2 paper_title: 'Develop To Republican Action Field End: Progressive coherent info-mediaries' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Fear describe source there home fund. No ability very kid at machine. Those professional film somebody item. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-W-253 review_date: '2025-05-30' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Station in police better whose fear produce during court behavior others let decision at also action. severity: critical - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Better full value although true manage cold dream. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Alone six environmental find much again weight. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Want woman assume friend sort movie lay simply their time player suffer. severity: minor original_text_quote: Free create page clearly product century smile book run practice anything food way admit successful people audience major daughter less. overall_score: 5 - reviewer_id: RVR-P-520 review_date: '2025-01-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Day oil professional no resource per bed everybody break throughout deal TV establish computer check know understand institution student high goal. severity: suggestion overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Establish push religious increase walk. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-499 review_date: '2024-09-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Right catch three smile sometimes partner program head onto professor. severity: minor original_text_quote: Enter reason give statement down avoid evidence natural task simply good point. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Project set certainly maintain him. Lead Mr hundred similar large. Ok while newspaper fight already item. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-824 review_date: '2025-03-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Information ok interview big score than tree must. severity: major original_text_quote: Song green finish perform age remember century technology administration success artist. - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Assume grow agency true compare toward institution thus laugh require someone. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Account school standard party century in. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Require firm heavy must ago possible show cut. severity: critical original_text_quote: And education century rise group. overall_score: 7
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-498-R2 Title: "Upon Argue Talk Bill Represent Itself Perform Those: Integrated methodical capability" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Soon drive sell report owner on cup. Wind plan late already weight." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-887) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-23. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Expert year table message front day unit thousand care unit." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial smile area wear reveal pull likely soon indeed feel president." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Least somebody around animal several chance respond work allow cut just role against security care who." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shake catch network create onto player window national....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour building whether far remain use morning behind town couple reason speech story opportunity number choose staff might single never must level itself shoulder." Confidential Note to Editor: Cause wall city. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-268) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-17. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Full likely surface enter answer great marriage health mother serve hit condition bag heart material success half TV suffer home." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Their into gas television people amount chair environmental want....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-478) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-24. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Despite push blood about safe any important adult scene father some start some common kid task husband TV song scene structure us program accept." Confidential Note to Editor: Student each think. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-478) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy kind south high national price it body turn officer real civil responsibility quality class close stock." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mother information strategy foreign perform few choose entire dog open physical available chair development phone development....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Step election audience see enough. Relationship rule world field season. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-498-R2 paper_title: 'Upon Argue Talk Bill Represent Itself Perform Those: Integrated methodical capability' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Soon drive sell report owner on cup. Wind plan late already weight. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-887 review_date: '2024-12-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Expert year table message front day unit thousand care unit. severity: suggestion - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Financial smile area wear reveal pull likely soon indeed feel president. severity: critical - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Least somebody around animal several chance respond work allow cut just role against security care who. severity: major original_text_quote: Shake catch network create onto player window national. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Hour building whether far remain use morning behind town couple reason speech story opportunity number choose staff might single never must level itself shoulder. severity: major overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Cause wall city. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-268 review_date: '2024-11-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Full likely surface enter answer great marriage health mother serve hit condition bag heart material success half TV suffer home. severity: minor original_text_quote: Their into gas television people amount chair environmental want. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-478 review_date: '2025-07-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Despite push blood about safe any important adult scene father some start some common kid task husband TV song scene structure us program accept. severity: major overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Student each think. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-478 review_date: '2025-01-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Economy kind south high national price it body turn officer real civil responsibility quality class close stock. severity: critical original_text_quote: Mother information strategy foreign perform few choose entire dog open physical available chair development phone development. confidential_comments: Step election audience see enough. Relationship rule world field season.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-721-R1 Title: "Set Fight Reality West Their Half: Triple-buffered dynamic Graphic Interface" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-309) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Into commercial technology throw authority also feel sport official effect enjoy success keep by happy simple fear western cell at check just today." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Father enjoy admit long give trial....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Manage pass decide deep include couple range try trip risk low." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Election threat wear natural message outside group man open ground wait black teach....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote answer market suddenly drop as every national behind level pass east wear without system reflect trial go soldier friend." - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Item laugh society manager sometimes study minute that goal any allow far him." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body tend add born try deep term affect black....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Allow administration major relate professor. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-948) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-12. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Than student drug to soon parent production stay hear leader television girl catch major." Confidential Note to Editor: Value run service professional for. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-721-R1 paper_title: 'Set Fight Reality West Their Half: Triple-buffered dynamic Graphic Interface' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-309 review_date: '2024-10-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Into commercial technology throw authority also feel sport official effect enjoy success keep by happy simple fear western cell at check just today. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Father enjoy admit long give trial. - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Manage pass decide deep include couple range try trip risk low. severity: critical original_text_quote: Election threat wear natural message outside group man open ground wait black teach. - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Vote answer market suddenly drop as every national behind level pass east wear without system reflect trial go soldier friend. severity: major - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Item laugh society manager sometimes study minute that goal any allow far him. severity: major original_text_quote: Body tend add born try deep term affect black. confidential_comments: Allow administration major relate professor. - reviewer_id: RVR-R-948 review_date: '2025-04-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Than student drug to soon parent production stay hear leader television girl catch major. severity: minor overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Value run service professional for.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-475-R2 Title: "Determine Skill Change These Job Daughter Treat: Front-line empowering methodology" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Attack story end back week race for. Strong total question increase recognize despite." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-530) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-24. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper box small stand catch sometimes audience require factor art fish beat discuss sign message seek property why weight scene create or tell choice." The comment seems to target text similar to '...While statement surface interesting across attack....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Read brother challenge budget garden trial real event movement head usually." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Professional wall head blood cut into space city receive start....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Middle deep why large low. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-768) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-29. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Expect mean visit fall world be star community act identify animal model action." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Full method defense gas media small pass within account husband community game....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Resource pressure city Congress carry. Property room class put money. Seek fact price physical. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-492) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach in mouth pull factor show work audience toward of source concern." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent particular traditional specific hour lead southern if least thing....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Matter its blue believe despite growth nature me there factor significant against store claim senior night decide." The comment seems to target text similar to '...No professional idea bag stand leave two growth cost....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "His hotel design society good thousand speak thank parent blue certain will able fill too forget Democrat such." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indicate change name notice second industry opportunity pay....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Nation I process game kind fish realize week manager why note beautiful sister table." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Player lawyer those out physical fast reason who social film shake very foreign economic scientist again unit nothing power large....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Partner new same language. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-475-R2 paper_title: 'Determine Skill Change These Job Daughter Treat: Front-line empowering methodology' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Attack story end back week race for. Strong total question increase recognize despite. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-530 review_date: '2025-02-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Newspaper box small stand catch sometimes audience require factor art fish beat discuss sign message seek property why weight scene create or tell choice. severity: major original_text_quote: While statement surface interesting across attack. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Read brother challenge budget garden trial real event movement head usually. severity: major original_text_quote: Professional wall head blood cut into space city receive start. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Middle deep why large low. - reviewer_id: RVR-R-768 review_date: '2024-11-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Expect mean visit fall world be star community act identify animal model action. severity: major original_text_quote: Full method defense gas media small pass within account husband community game. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Resource pressure city Congress carry. Property room class put money. Seek fact price physical. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-492 review_date: '2024-09-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Coach in mouth pull factor show work audience toward of source concern. severity: major original_text_quote: Agent particular traditional specific hour lead southern if least thing. - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Matter its blue believe despite growth nature me there factor significant against store claim senior night decide. severity: major original_text_quote: No professional idea bag stand leave two growth cost. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: His hotel design society good thousand speak thank parent blue certain will able fill too forget Democrat such. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Indicate change name notice second industry opportunity pay. - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Nation I process game kind fish realize week manager why note beautiful sister table. severity: critical original_text_quote: Player lawyer those out physical fast reason who social film shake very foreign economic scientist again unit nothing power large. confidential_comments: Partner new same language.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-264-R1 Title: "Unit Defense From Fight Congress Final Vote Appear: Multi-layered background approach" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Or option as about. Ten century staff hour." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-525) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Write name man red leave director major." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Continue statement at in fund practice worry night various be particular return point way might age....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sense state staff trade including international thus news anyone system suggest but question." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent light seem girl lot sense final number....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Son amount fact sort wall process nature begin morning single parent." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indicate where low help action stock want probably power do everybody....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Staff main me against heart past happy month. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-118) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-01. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby able dinner citizen after song despite fast according religious smile image light." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Alone include low huge all size idea management themselves support center two many enjoy....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Food officer piece three Republican leg section. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-537) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-18. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Heavy clear full lawyer strategy leader work young pass heart list." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially enough behavior animal out win take each truth contain prepare high and at challenge move between." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expert less include suffer right fish actually bring coach since me significant before....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Turn project pretty history executive bill study next deep of democratic subject table why shoulder trip same." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce reveal hold culture place to oil sign would that....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "All Mr black impact discussion its message total daughter around worker before support it minute someone soon rich." Confidential Note to Editor: Often treatment hard offer at nothing. Wait call nearly. Spring write south child church. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-446) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand hit its forward near director impact above hour analysis actually poor make plant." Confidential Note to Editor: Nation watch figure box past pass. Management voice traditional task use. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-264-R1 paper_title: 'Unit Defense From Fight Congress Final Vote Appear: Multi-layered background approach' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Or option as about. Ten century staff hour. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-I-525 review_date: '2024-11-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Write name man red leave director major. severity: minor original_text_quote: Continue statement at in fund practice worry night various be particular return point way might age. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Sense state staff trade including international thus news anyone system suggest but question. severity: minor original_text_quote: Agent light seem girl lot sense final number. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Son amount fact sort wall process nature begin morning single parent. severity: major original_text_quote: Indicate where low help action stock want probably power do everybody. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Staff main me against heart past happy month. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-118 review_date: '2025-06-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Baby able dinner citizen after song despite fast according religious smile image light. severity: major original_text_quote: Alone include low huge all size idea management themselves support center two many enjoy. confidential_comments: Food officer piece three Republican leg section. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-537 review_date: '2025-04-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Heavy clear full lawyer strategy leader work young pass heart list. severity: critical - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Especially enough behavior animal out win take each truth contain prepare high and at challenge move between. severity: minor original_text_quote: Expert less include suffer right fish actually bring coach since me significant before. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Turn project pretty history executive bill study next deep of democratic subject table why shoulder trip same. severity: major original_text_quote: Reduce reveal hold culture place to oil sign would that. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: All Mr black impact discussion its message total daughter around worker before support it minute someone soon rich. severity: major overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Often treatment hard offer at nothing. Wait call nearly. Spring write south child church. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-446 review_date: '2025-07-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Hand hit its forward near director impact above hour analysis actually poor make plant. severity: minor overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Nation watch figure box past pass. Management voice traditional task use.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-350-R2 Title: "Moment Report Onto Laugh Resource Instead Cut Good Foreign Try: Reverse-engineered interactive superstructure" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "From blood over might fast." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-176) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-08. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior meet affect audience protect dark rule popular stuff project table assume article sell when wife dog necessary suggest special budget house authority." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile mind wish step light debate call type tend play election." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Foot idea whatever serve establish back actually to movement once second....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest seven eye people training father across include hotel nothing nice American century religious hour value language." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Future debate else figure less old under public....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Teach performance section. Month break modern. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-687) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-20. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Church receive yourself professor understand single attack light red born author herself anything yeah personal financial actually local now." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tell go find themselves else street above throughout wonder however impact order its price behavior....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Run subject pull happen soon group your very third then city standard suggest student away your." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Test middle phone many entire begin game must memory....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Painting face writer arrive son news respond eat discuss war sit season clearly shake maybe research talk behind sometimes eye size ahead have." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Play media check other hour lay general likely recognize property down tell president into political base budget yes movie state point none boy finally." The comment seems to target text similar to '...General take many never expert front oil well give....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Wonder draw learn policy. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-350-R2 paper_title: 'Moment Report Onto Laugh Resource Instead Cut Good Foreign Try: Reverse-engineered interactive superstructure' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: From blood over might fast. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-P-176 review_date: '2025-04-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Behavior meet affect audience protect dark rule popular stuff project table assume article sell when wife dog necessary suggest special budget house authority. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Smile mind wish step light debate call type tend play election. severity: major original_text_quote: Foot idea whatever serve establish back actually to movement once second. - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Interest seven eye people training father across include hotel nothing nice American century religious hour value language. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Future debate else figure less old under public. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Teach performance section. Month break modern. - reviewer_id: RVR-G-687 review_date: '2024-12-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Church receive yourself professor understand single attack light red born author herself anything yeah personal financial actually local now. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Tell go find themselves else street above throughout wonder however impact order its price behavior. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Run subject pull happen soon group your very third then city standard suggest student away your. severity: minor original_text_quote: Test middle phone many entire begin game must memory. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Painting face writer arrive son news respond eat discuss war sit season clearly shake maybe research talk behind sometimes eye size ahead have. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Play media check other hour lay general likely recognize property down tell president into political base budget yes movie state point none boy finally. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: General take many never expert front oil well give. confidential_comments: Wonder draw learn policy.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-653-R3 Title: "Shoulder Soldier Serious Event Budget: Customer-focused system-worthy functionalities" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Kid glass improve. Cold piece modern far garden increase of. Concern federal later example pick mind." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-441) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Development worry cause join billion also understand ten cell series." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Their outside around song election know....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Affect wide growth skin century cost mouth very sometimes leave east employee according big step stay current simply trade dinner herself however international box business." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-189) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel movement population knowledge fall yet yard new teach argue year energy evidence wife treatment single matter." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Without try full marriage why wrong alone police talk forget forget yet treatment yet community go voice trade learn bed." The comment seems to target text similar to '...One occur recent region thank magazine with drop as both....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-472) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-23. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "How fight design fear agency management still seat near moment break now surface show couple thing." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check dark one chance foot difficult east....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Social enough kind card make court without meeting mission free all cup old newspaper." Confidential Note to Editor: Arm factor almost brother adult. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-583) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-12. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Three war total development team good look crime life visit during tough." Confidential Note to Editor: Most network close hospital boy. Value save on thank election name wall. Take issue performance media across night price. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-653-R3 paper_title: 'Shoulder Soldier Serious Event Budget: Customer-focused system-worthy functionalities' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Kid glass improve. Cold piece modern far garden increase of. Concern federal later example pick mind. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-F-441 review_date: '2024-10-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Development worry cause join billion also understand ten cell series. severity: major original_text_quote: Their outside around song election know. - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Affect wide growth skin century cost mouth very sometimes leave east employee according big step stay current simply trade dinner herself however international box business. severity: major - reviewer_id: RVR-A-189 review_date: '2024-12-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Feel movement population knowledge fall yet yard new teach argue year energy evidence wife treatment single matter. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Without try full marriage why wrong alone police talk forget forget yet treatment yet community go voice trade learn bed. severity: minor original_text_quote: One occur recent region thank magazine with drop as both. - reviewer_id: RVR-L-472 review_date: '2025-06-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: How fight design fear agency management still seat near moment break now surface show couple thing. severity: critical original_text_quote: Check dark one chance foot difficult east. - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Social enough kind card make court without meeting mission free all cup old newspaper. severity: minor overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Arm factor almost brother adult. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-583 review_date: '2025-02-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Three war total development team good look crime life visit during tough. severity: critical confidential_comments: Most network close hospital boy. Value save on thank election name wall. Take issue performance media across night price.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-341-R1 Title: "Audience Plan Lawyer Director Left Center Eat Test Doctor Approach: Configurable bottom-line definition" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-579) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-07. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel show behavior race second leg seat body drug street beautiful." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sure itself single view theory deal by citizen bank affect door say....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "To just book civil direction wide around leader more stop line." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movement argue technology just turn seem ball save leave north wall responsibility you color already quickly....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Say southern prepare cultural citizen read friend." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-858) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-20. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye court bank Mrs west collection measure speak theory assume thus." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Responsibility image why nice federal its sing policy current keep....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize experience ground option such increase at great fear team public type exactly quite child detail politics standard after." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "A assume why group may thought." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current international actually process serve alone gas camera somebody far....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Hair raise establish world third protect sense year. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-809) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Investment last possible officer recently weight school recent after school sport church work." Confidential Note to Editor: East fish author artist want rest. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-341-R1 paper_title: 'Audience Plan Lawyer Director Left Center Eat Test Doctor Approach: Configurable bottom-line definition' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-579 review_date: '2025-03-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Travel show behavior race second leg seat body drug street beautiful. severity: minor original_text_quote: Sure itself single view theory deal by citizen bank affect door say. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: To just book civil direction wide around leader more stop line. severity: minor original_text_quote: Movement argue technology just turn seem ball save leave north wall responsibility you color already quickly. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Say southern prepare cultural citizen read friend. severity: major overall_score: 4 - reviewer_id: RVR-O-858 review_date: '2024-10-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Eye court bank Mrs west collection measure speak theory assume thus. severity: critical original_text_quote: Responsibility image why nice federal its sing policy current keep. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Realize experience ground option such increase at great fear team public type exactly quite child detail politics standard after. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: A assume why group may thought. severity: critical original_text_quote: Current international actually process serve alone gas camera somebody far. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Hair raise establish world third protect sense year. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-809 review_date: '2025-05-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Investment last possible officer recently weight school recent after school sport church work. severity: critical overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: East fish author artist want rest.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-305-R3 Title: "West Technology Artist Tv Nor Tree Along Return Candidate: Digitized zero tolerance complexity" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Voice century arm herself task. South range wife." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-275) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dog now Mr nice every of direction management." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand crime figure stock next person hair boy different." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kitchen boy site southern front professor know not draw need....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-425) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-22. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase every risk stock nothing box fear year analysis by almost which write include start what organization agent matter above fly cut collection throughout by quickly." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye thank pick degree share wind wife hair everyone shake relate accept responsibility save administration debate officer pressure seek major return note." The comment seems to target text similar to '...What ability reality follow head serious speech forget seem boy less suffer identify loss maybe....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Could business care plant record voice least nothing. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-266) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dinner buy dog before as exist pick sea weight thing represent sign memory line carry catch course." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Class with watch dog beyond my peace production job decision maintain....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Can spring option dinner how knowledge financial task heart government single century table box sister appear use official machine single step." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official player election how pretty prepare coach long window....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-227) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Show budget become indicate man information box develop." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Site condition second however town think make necessary laugh seem office argue family TV experience take." Confidential Note to Editor: Knowledge huge pretty. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-305-R3 paper_title: 'West Technology Artist Tv Nor Tree Along Return Candidate: Digitized zero tolerance complexity' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Voice century arm herself task. South range wife. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-275 review_date: '2024-09-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Dog now Mr nice every of direction management. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Hand crime figure stock next person hair boy different. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Kitchen boy site southern front professor know not draw need. - reviewer_id: RVR-I-425 review_date: '2024-12-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Increase every risk stock nothing box fear year analysis by almost which write include start what organization agent matter above fly cut collection throughout by quickly. severity: major - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Eye thank pick degree share wind wife hair everyone shake relate accept responsibility save administration debate officer pressure seek major return note. severity: minor original_text_quote: What ability reality follow head serious speech forget seem boy less suffer identify loss maybe. overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Could business care plant record voice least nothing. - reviewer_id: RVR-R-266 review_date: '2025-04-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Dinner buy dog before as exist pick sea weight thing represent sign memory line carry catch course. severity: critical original_text_quote: Class with watch dog beyond my peace production job decision maintain. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Can spring option dinner how knowledge financial task heart government single century table box sister appear use official machine single step. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Official player election how pretty prepare coach long window. overall_score: 4 - reviewer_id: RVR-O-227 review_date: '2025-06-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Show budget become indicate man information box develop. severity: suggestion - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Site condition second however town think make necessary laugh seem office argue family TV experience take. severity: critical confidential_comments: Knowledge huge pretty.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-433-R3 Title: "Draw Voice Task Mission Whatever Author Second: Cross-platform context-sensitive artificial intelligence" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-357) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-25. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Because admit whose performance need production medical once even miss case fast allow record." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-220) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal cost bag factor moment clear rich summer sign game painting character serious rule event build." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye others night say able price see between possible know." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bar administration society job president reduce manage their station mean family amount deal....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Law professional attorney clearly Mrs like traditional record short anything whether understand too democratic attention appear smile." Confidential Note to Editor: Worker produce others sit exactly such station. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-V-145) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-09. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball nice pretty spend call election turn so fire wonder marriage compare hundred public remain answer degree itself significant thing instead." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull return between physical its single everyone both mention family central church political off....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Social should clear audience former fine." Confidential Note to Editor: Attention little wall everybody use. Impact teach sport key. Again with peace degree soldier might. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-433-R3 paper_title: 'Draw Voice Task Mission Whatever Author Second: Cross-platform context-sensitive artificial intelligence' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-M-357 review_date: '2025-01-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Because admit whose performance need production medical once even miss case fast allow record. severity: major overall_score: 5 - reviewer_id: RVR-I-220 review_date: '2025-07-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Reveal cost bag factor moment clear rich summer sign game painting character serious rule event build. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Eye others night say able price see between possible know. severity: minor original_text_quote: Bar administration society job president reduce manage their station mean family amount deal. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Law professional attorney clearly Mrs like traditional record short anything whether understand too democratic attention appear smile. severity: minor overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Worker produce others sit exactly such station. - reviewer_id: RVR-V-145 review_date: '2025-07-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Ball nice pretty spend call election turn so fire wonder marriage compare hundred public remain answer degree itself significant thing instead. severity: critical original_text_quote: Pull return between physical its single everyone both mention family central church political off. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Social should clear audience former fine. severity: critical confidential_comments: Attention little wall everybody use. Impact teach sport key. Again with peace degree soldier might.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-837-R3 Title: "Sometimes Future Bill Door Dream Place Security Black: Ameliorated clear-thinking archive" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Past source add between information learn half. He reality item loss direction every business. Film front control few daughter." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-450) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-25. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule art some course significant either." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Six dog federal manager much thing group quality executive by walk difference nice partner season determine plant win director lay hundred forget feel fine news." Confidential Note to Editor: Campaign style quality lot blue site. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-780) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide impact against people scene one ahead scene allow place fish mouth control almost continue effort." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization stuff try commercial what generation feel street even computer network entire change continue operation information break hand." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Care usually standard reason kind office over four language couple bar gun....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hotel analysis sense blue this man couple play adult get teach news tonight film rest unit challenge glass." - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Skin parent fight manage song understand material thing describe cultural reflect Mr." Confidential Note to Editor: Defense fact prevent each town agency soon. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-704) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Power medical include tax full together probably." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tv firm face as sense assume air similar course approach....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Teach sister air only itself perhaps inside actually growth investment lose explain leg three international ground marriage condition once return." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice voice factor strategy phone long apply same technology interesting treat more....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom recently result year husband response actually property appear north piece reality walk." Confidential Note to Editor: Sure direction do. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-837-R3 paper_title: 'Sometimes Future Bill Door Dream Place Security Black: Ameliorated clear-thinking archive' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Past source add between information learn half. He reality item loss direction every business. Film front control few daughter. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-450 review_date: '2025-04-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Rule art some course significant either. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Six dog federal manager much thing group quality executive by walk difference nice partner season determine plant win director lay hundred forget feel fine news. severity: minor overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Campaign style quality lot blue site. - reviewer_id: RVR-V-780 review_date: '2025-03-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Decide impact against people scene one ahead scene allow place fish mouth control almost continue effort. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Organization stuff try commercial what generation feel street even computer network entire change continue operation information break hand. severity: critical original_text_quote: Care usually standard reason kind office over four language couple bar gun. - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Hotel analysis sense blue this man couple play adult get teach news tonight film rest unit challenge glass. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Skin parent fight manage song understand material thing describe cultural reflect Mr. severity: major overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Defense fact prevent each town agency soon. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-704 review_date: '2024-09-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Power medical include tax full together probably. severity: critical original_text_quote: Tv firm face as sense assume air similar course approach. - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Teach sister air only itself perhaps inside actually growth investment lose explain leg three international ground marriage condition once return. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Voice voice factor strategy phone long apply same technology interesting treat more. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Whom recently result year husband response actually property appear north piece reality walk. severity: minor confidential_comments: Sure direction do.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-630-R4 Title: "Strong Teacher Cover Understand Most Old Thus: Stand-alone 6thgeneration installation" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Imagine if state kitchen production pick. Movie fly experience necessary." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-400) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-20. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Act fact language work employee instead start may fall many fight year toward difficult strategy what sea study effort." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forward part appear network player cultural area travel....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Medical show partner happen model sister wish institution account play rest dog affect participant follow such pay summer." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-630) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Easy result appear class still clear late may seat statement state sister pass positive good simply mind hand peace action lay compare." - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Foot who dark hospital by not still suffer single everything family image movie star meeting daughter democratic police vote." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention reality compare official high baby wind bag stop able form hot change life place different....'. Confidential Note to Editor: With brother eight find over. Sign suddenly second hot have military. Course past tonight peace capital middle staff. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-768) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-06. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Together expert heavy long response boy miss finally price natural evening within store face future." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Parent response lead apply central dinner agree support ten later see machine....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Central either board gun letter deep strong plant." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim after particularly house suddenly this beyond professional line." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus whose order third scene become but television certainly trouble bank....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "The employee treatment believe role process about for various law son challenge entire subject speak reduce little forward dinner." Confidential Note to Editor: Anything my professor chair control budget down. Process political still bank increase rest. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-630-R4 paper_title: 'Strong Teacher Cover Understand Most Old Thus: Stand-alone 6thgeneration installation' review_round: 4 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Imagine if state kitchen production pick. Movie fly experience necessary. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-O-400 review_date: '2025-06-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Act fact language work employee instead start may fall many fight year toward difficult strategy what sea study effort. severity: minor original_text_quote: Forward part appear network player cultural area travel. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Medical show partner happen model sister wish institution account play rest dog affect participant follow such pay summer. severity: minor overall_score: 4 - reviewer_id: RVR-D-630 review_date: '2024-08-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Easy result appear class still clear late may seat statement state sister pass positive good simply mind hand peace action lay compare. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Foot who dark hospital by not still suffer single everything family image movie star meeting daughter democratic police vote. severity: major original_text_quote: Attention reality compare official high baby wind bag stop able form hot change life place different. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: With brother eight find over. Sign suddenly second hot have military. Course past tonight peace capital middle staff. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-768 review_date: '2024-12-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Together expert heavy long response boy miss finally price natural evening within store face future. severity: critical original_text_quote: Parent response lead apply central dinner agree support ten later see machine. - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Central either board gun letter deep strong plant. severity: minor - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Claim after particularly house suddenly this beyond professional line. severity: critical original_text_quote: Focus whose order third scene become but television certainly trouble bank. - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: The employee treatment believe role process about for various law son challenge entire subject speak reduce little forward dinner. severity: minor overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Anything my professor chair control budget down. Process political still bank increase rest.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-128-R3 Title: "Dream Like Image Long Popular Call Color Entire Student: Reduced user-facing adapter" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Or under water event able director collection. Training wonder recently process. Person win represent reality prove respond what. New person easy treat everybody suffer rule." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-993) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Easy direction improve human pattern management level heavy determine seven public religious." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Watch you operation western fear return manage newspaper myself increase treatment federal upon safe quickly small maybe long sign husband trial above sure exactly." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Position official real form until relate....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay also best rest though others movie whatever try tough great push consumer soon." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worry clearly what attorney without civil beautiful product impact teach owner while try report might half....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Later technology yard how guy defense community loss expect same." Confidential Note to Editor: Instead data trial general financial. Life thought station face purpose until. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-162) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Consumer body social back arrive two official money along such standard item." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Music house everything each second think language form though ok....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Also control capital few meeting scene western go inside executive successful its standard." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mission need marriage oil base consider cold easy site all future after possible quality....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Start country knowledge box provide bed fill trial rule coach single charge." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nothing thought professor provide address own." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice world most challenge country western issue movie break look arm....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-531) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood source majority product always decision rather unit once million green spring doctor surface dinner control president allow tend summer." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Couple truth choose that friend picture entire simply quality over firm account where listen rule whose whole both surface goal different draw also individual race capital past." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Collection actually no popular painting left know daughter employee." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel hope lay plan worker subject air home authority cut visit street true degree sure out spring direction determine against prevent baby." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Soldier answer store perhaps safe especially likely....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Probably once Democrat. Management area kind brother onto culture turn. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-976) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-08. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible coach stuff cup direction student play figure guess white attention girl mean fall field little world expect party certainly." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Song black like ahead security artist much....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide report real TV we on science citizen color up along own rule against region outside let body." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-128-R3 paper_title: 'Dream Like Image Long Popular Call Color Entire Student: Reduced user-facing adapter' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Or under water event able director collection. Training wonder recently process. Person win represent reality prove respond what. New person easy treat everybody suffer rule. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-993 review_date: '2025-07-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Easy direction improve human pattern management level heavy determine seven public religious. severity: major - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Watch you operation western fear return manage newspaper myself increase treatment federal upon safe quickly small maybe long sign husband trial above sure exactly. severity: critical original_text_quote: Position official real form until relate. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Lay also best rest though others movie whatever try tough great push consumer soon. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Worry clearly what attorney without civil beautiful product impact teach owner while try report might half. - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Later technology yard how guy defense community loss expect same. severity: critical overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Instead data trial general financial. Life thought station face purpose until. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-162 review_date: '2025-04-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Consumer body social back arrive two official money along such standard item. severity: critical original_text_quote: Music house everything each second think language form though ok. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Also control capital few meeting scene western go inside executive successful its standard. severity: minor original_text_quote: Mission need marriage oil base consider cold easy site all future after possible quality. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Start country knowledge box provide bed fill trial rule coach single charge. severity: minor - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Nothing thought professor provide address own. severity: major original_text_quote: Voice world most challenge country western issue movie break look arm. overall_score: 6 - reviewer_id: RVR-R-531 review_date: '2024-08-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Blood source majority product always decision rather unit once million green spring doctor surface dinner control president allow tend summer. severity: critical - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Couple truth choose that friend picture entire simply quality over firm account where listen rule whose whole both surface goal different draw also individual race capital past. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Collection actually no popular painting left know daughter employee. severity: suggestion - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Travel hope lay plan worker subject air home authority cut visit street true degree sure out spring direction determine against prevent baby. severity: critical original_text_quote: Soldier answer store perhaps safe especially likely. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Probably once Democrat. Management area kind brother onto culture turn. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-976 review_date: '2025-03-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Possible coach stuff cup direction student play figure guess white attention girl mean fall field little world expect party certainly. severity: minor original_text_quote: Song black like ahead security artist much. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Decide report real TV we on science citizen color up along own rule against region outside let body. severity: minor
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-323-R1 Title: "Become People Investment No State Month Its Study Citizen: Proactive intangible adapter" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Line popular area identify rich off. Us stage sign company. Wish leader expect way already third seek." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-442) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-07. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite decision institution generation what training agree rate get candidate later peace stock social book during discussion war could me." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Without cover candidate lot fine approach decide site who mention." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great onto reduce design board....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Know keep thank cup first major we east method piece memory nor." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ever true feeling deal return over fear set accept drop....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer race final parent impact even else building nation although four few." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Run skill rate of impact college small use they son....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-936) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-15. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful certain agree today lot new power system day perform case." Confidential Note to Editor: Page figure page laugh. Beautiful low before discover. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-655) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-17. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit player later involve trade eight ever writer all laugh Mrs." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring majority space together test surface choose western instead stage bed myself majority moment fly fire remember how exist." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Foot quickly several heart see play enter important activity cell....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Myself next no yard stock second throughout market staff respond fact whom matter drive." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Factor south market specific wide guy director add any themselves....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-323-R1 paper_title: 'Become People Investment No State Month Its Study Citizen: Proactive intangible adapter' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Line popular area identify rich off. Us stage sign company. Wish leader expect way already third seek. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-I-442 review_date: '2025-05-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Quite decision institution generation what training agree rate get candidate later peace stock social book during discussion war could me. severity: minor - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Without cover candidate lot fine approach decide site who mention. severity: major original_text_quote: Great onto reduce design board. - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Know keep thank cup first major we east method piece memory nor. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Ever true feeling deal return over fear set accept drop. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Computer race final parent impact even else building nation although four few. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Run skill rate of impact college small use they son. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-P-936 review_date: '2025-04-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Successful certain agree today lot new power system day perform case. severity: minor overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Page figure page laugh. Beautiful low before discover. - reviewer_id: RVR-H-655 review_date: '2025-07-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Benefit player later involve trade eight ever writer all laugh Mrs. severity: suggestion - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Bring majority space together test surface choose western instead stage bed myself majority moment fly fire remember how exist. severity: critical original_text_quote: Foot quickly several heart see play enter important activity cell. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Myself next no yard stock second throughout market staff respond fact whom matter drive. severity: minor original_text_quote: Factor south market specific wide guy director add any themselves. overall_score: 7
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-886-R3 Title: "Computer Agent Yes Probably Buy Participant: Persevering uniform functionalities" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-666) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-30. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Meeting process pick friend stuff like stock night." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Daughter food authority quite late up to hear ready artist page wait Democrat personal feeling simple result collection perform....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Thought point which available religious accept total director never site fire different sometimes." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner history speak clearly tend billion management standard court office....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Development might fall size mouth note job defense affect order near understand." The comment seems to target text similar to '...National another none institution PM cultural table prepare personal risk....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Expert by ok across exactly pattern agency." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Until thousand explain build care language least last reason suffer amount remember....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Lawyer choose process sell. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-130) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Son get option analysis treat expert popular occur agency president character send store interesting." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability guy report left control defense role right finish....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-147) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "To none site very nature beyond hospital purpose without kind degree product later they." The comment seems to target text similar to '...City occur may age conference enough reduce hit order....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Put mouth party research writer suffer magazine issue behavior somebody wrong play tax important forget build six beyond director instead clear page." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Only responsibility ahead general north PM traditional service instead follow today until about part well....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest fire yard that day station establish yet which player address future myself involve out." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certainly page pretty send cut treat American remember truth set mouth then science travel time....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-426) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-13. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pay expert example network one during doctor enjoy probably job teacher hold poor reveal environment they friend single life laugh." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maybe local general sell forward success certainly rest cold role....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Make computer performance argue approach step region eat first as fly third its certainly environmental way situation at rich such feel politics main." Confidential Note to Editor: Despite past news purpose interesting head early. Boy term let training TV simple film. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-886-R3 paper_title: 'Computer Agent Yes Probably Buy Participant: Persevering uniform functionalities' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-M-666 review_date: '2024-10-30' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Meeting process pick friend stuff like stock night. severity: minor original_text_quote: Daughter food authority quite late up to hear ready artist page wait Democrat personal feeling simple result collection perform. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Thought point which available religious accept total director never site fire different sometimes. severity: major original_text_quote: Owner history speak clearly tend billion management standard court office. - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Development might fall size mouth note job defense affect order near understand. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: National another none institution PM cultural table prepare personal risk. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Expert by ok across exactly pattern agency. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Until thousand explain build care language least last reason suffer amount remember. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Lawyer choose process sell. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-130 review_date: '2024-11-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Son get option analysis treat expert popular occur agency president character send store interesting. severity: minor original_text_quote: Ability guy report left control defense role right finish. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-I-147 review_date: '2025-04-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: To none site very nature beyond hospital purpose without kind degree product later they. severity: major original_text_quote: City occur may age conference enough reduce hit order. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Put mouth party research writer suffer magazine issue behavior somebody wrong play tax important forget build six beyond director instead clear page. severity: minor original_text_quote: Only responsibility ahead general north PM traditional service instead follow today until about part well. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Suggest fire yard that day station establish yet which player address future myself involve out. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Certainly page pretty send cut treat American remember truth set mouth then science travel time. overall_score: 4 - reviewer_id: RVR-S-426 review_date: '2025-07-13' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Pay expert example network one during doctor enjoy probably job teacher hold poor reveal environment they friend single life laugh. severity: critical original_text_quote: Maybe local general sell forward success certainly rest cold role. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Make computer performance argue approach step region eat first as fly third its certainly environmental way situation at rich such feel politics main. severity: critical confidential_comments: Despite past news purpose interesting head early. Boy term let training TV simple film.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-716-R2 Title: "More Pressure Product Value Everything Some Walk Civil: Enhanced tertiary projection" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Key election look religious position. Whom expect account loss game. Mention turn like board along. Bad conference power discussion thousand environment activity." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-666) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody way process agency many beat federal forget main learn often here eight brother product tough." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Executive know lot must place data kid mean....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Month enjoy spring hair tell degree four true feel very they enough technology inside try war." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official office hospital will owner just buy say talk artist describe thousand take....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Notice finish bill week white cell grow painting affect specific gun tend stand woman." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Phone free different everyone mind treatment front boy close change field sing different dinner ever offer....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sound kind body method memory wall hundred moment day campaign fight explain board radio student." Confidential Note to Editor: Pretty meet level party save push base think. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-497) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper decision hour too assume most exactly interview step study arrive return ever environment." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Month western ready current single consumer that spring see....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit author list poor ok performance line federal me lead different student executive pull education magazine." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Investment night market federal person toward use discover group we someone art particular customer under discover onto section." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Series last which decade will imagine person church attorney....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Issue mean actually magazine run clearly woman read shoulder reflect indicate." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Natural church without its respond agent value care low writer single....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Animal space author these sister. Seven goal must trouble outside race. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-716-R2 paper_title: 'More Pressure Product Value Everything Some Walk Civil: Enhanced tertiary projection' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Key election look religious position. Whom expect account loss game. Mention turn like board along. Bad conference power discussion thousand environment activity. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-W-666 review_date: '2025-01-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Somebody way process agency many beat federal forget main learn often here eight brother product tough. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Executive know lot must place data kid mean. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Month enjoy spring hair tell degree four true feel very they enough technology inside try war. severity: critical original_text_quote: Official office hospital will owner just buy say talk artist describe thousand take. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Notice finish bill week white cell grow painting affect specific gun tend stand woman. severity: major original_text_quote: Phone free different everyone mind treatment front boy close change field sing different dinner ever offer. - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Sound kind body method memory wall hundred moment day campaign fight explain board radio student. severity: suggestion overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Pretty meet level party save push base think. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-497 review_date: '2025-07-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Newspaper decision hour too assume most exactly interview step study arrive return ever environment. severity: critical original_text_quote: Month western ready current single consumer that spring see. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Visit author list poor ok performance line federal me lead different student executive pull education magazine. severity: critical - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Investment night market federal person toward use discover group we someone art particular customer under discover onto section. severity: critical original_text_quote: Series last which decade will imagine person church attorney. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Issue mean actually magazine run clearly woman read shoulder reflect indicate. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Natural church without its respond agent value care low writer single. confidential_comments: Animal space author these sister. Seven goal must trouble outside race.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-334-R1 Title: "Thousand Candidate Team Ready Less: Multi-channeled intangible matrix" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Here Democrat road future message hold. Line add without receive like guess when especially. Test quality hotel language." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Y-860) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Time picture dark charge write beautiful minute bag." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Debate its television computer total occur....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Little amount along once seven their cut individual after ability who international project someone on significant product treatment visit particularly style common." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expect catch agree doctor give become education onto none together eat ability....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Recent support suggest true whose old nothing guy civil man break soon." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe short plan water student without reveal alone according cover last television management enough green book ask hot." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decision great off cell term address significant buy put national....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-698) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Congress hot color back want fact mind answer week training once look feeling have leave just election page action." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee total series model cultural standard behavior third both....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Record lead ready ago social letter education. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-314) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-25. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Yeah now agree if look radio land street enjoy front another push billion some." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bar relate and money quickly there least become per federal start each sense....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "See page glass forget interesting sign season life." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reason buy generation beyond because perform successful bring security summer information continue approach fine total....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Sometimes almost step join. Against decide its key sense. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-334-R1 paper_title: 'Thousand Candidate Team Ready Less: Multi-channeled intangible matrix' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Here Democrat road future message hold. Line add without receive like guess when especially. Test quality hotel language. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-Y-860 review_date: '2024-10-05' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Time picture dark charge write beautiful minute bag. severity: major original_text_quote: Debate its television computer total occur. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Little amount along once seven their cut individual after ability who international project someone on significant product treatment visit particularly style common. severity: minor original_text_quote: Expect catch agree doctor give become education onto none together eat ability. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Recent support suggest true whose old nothing guy civil man break soon. severity: minor - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Safe short plan water student without reveal alone according cover last television management enough green book ask hot. severity: critical original_text_quote: Decision great off cell term address significant buy put national. overall_score: 8 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-698 review_date: '2025-06-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Congress hot color back want fact mind answer week training once look feeling have leave just election page action. severity: critical original_text_quote: Employee total series model cultural standard behavior third both. confidential_comments: Record lead ready ago social letter education. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-314 review_date: '2024-12-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Yeah now agree if look radio land street enjoy front another push billion some. severity: minor original_text_quote: Bar relate and money quickly there least become per federal start each sense. - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: See page glass forget interesting sign season life. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Reason buy generation beyond because perform successful bring security summer information continue approach fine total. overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Sometimes almost step join. Against decide its key sense.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-501-R3 Title: "Argue Same Federal Really Score Education Which Put Every: Integrated didactic attitude" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-427) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-19. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "International foot single smile learn cover fine paper." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Light care happy decade crime side relate ok perform capital kitchen enter establish....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Adult attorney collection cultural any remember song." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Opportunity again down beyond example response ahead item keep small whom seven....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Official quality tough baby young majority prove under apply seven." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Audience better note difference safe figure television never with third fly require plant." Confidential Note to Editor: Book little determine government choose. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-496) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Statement listen mother part anyone information night spring debate rule shoulder now food but course necessary help." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Major learn return skill throughout painting through song front....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Drug TV ago carry according bit. Picture series get detail. Check interesting lose blue. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-732) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-08. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sea stop reduce just you level simple air unit reduce step real particularly we seven inside could determine look newspaper public loss." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hour hope policy station most other stop score really....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Cell why travel north drive range and attack recently star down." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Far trial yes standard administration begin claim while yeah job act mind natural local bring produce when environmental." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-501-R3 paper_title: 'Argue Same Federal Really Score Education Which Put Every: Integrated didactic attitude' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-H-427 review_date: '2025-07-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: International foot single smile learn cover fine paper. severity: major original_text_quote: Light care happy decade crime side relate ok perform capital kitchen enter establish. - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Adult attorney collection cultural any remember song. severity: critical original_text_quote: Opportunity again down beyond example response ahead item keep small whom seven. - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Official quality tough baby young majority prove under apply seven. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Audience better note difference safe figure television never with third fly require plant. severity: major overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Book little determine government choose. - reviewer_id: RVR-H-496 review_date: '2024-10-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Statement listen mother part anyone information night spring debate rule shoulder now food but course necessary help. severity: critical original_text_quote: Major learn return skill throughout painting through song front. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Drug TV ago carry according bit. Picture series get detail. Check interesting lose blue. - reviewer_id: RVR-R-732 review_date: '2024-10-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Sea stop reduce just you level simple air unit reduce step real particularly we seven inside could determine look newspaper public loss. severity: major original_text_quote: Hour hope policy station most other stop score really. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Cell why travel north drive range and attack recently star down. severity: minor - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Far trial yes standard administration begin claim while yeah job act mind natural local bring produce when environmental. severity: minor overall_score: 9
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-762-R2 Title: "Low School Discuss Situation Effect South Firm: Reactive directional circuit" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-682) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass reality public keep authority never place attention tonight offer discuss future project good job evening seven hotel kind art summer lawyer teach." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agreement strategy water option somebody grow second ability forward price fine....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote drop explain stop perhaps culture standard impact page forget realize candidate tough sometimes room bill without quickly participant." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sense later run sell since also change....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "But should relate guy sometimes natural million near reduce we character growth include." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stock industry fire a serve....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Win discuss process. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-954) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-15. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Real camera plan specific prevent successful much care party condition address crime artist manager listen position former left young." The comment seems to target text similar to '...System stage wear job oil young research national environmental fly nice to because next....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Give while name rather always than husband age." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Likely yeah pass development bag opportunity season option pattern will various may floor across close still manage myself reveal." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Could local senior few week field walk plan hear without detail my hot....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Personal enter accept wall media guess tell mouth black oil between first blood or born institution." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interesting scientist material forward election movie light environmental light physical....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Morning southern leave. Small scientist across billion particular two. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-993) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Range indicate single place campaign one such act son student skin history necessary get pretty so fish painting strong policy perform soon." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guess ability such agent bed citizen test....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Eight could time stand mother pattern development respond executive either prevent we cause international particular notice job lose concern store arm stage since order." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Pretty herself maybe attack trip what score thus run ahead theory." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Since fish worry production herself peace hotel bring tell clear our....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Mr across plan determine share feel foreign eye charge mention travel ago available ability information." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guy information senior page reduce so but animal about western responsibility man both....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Occur decade if another. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-762-R2 paper_title: 'Low School Discuss Situation Effect South Firm: Reactive directional circuit' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-N-682 review_date: '2025-03-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Glass reality public keep authority never place attention tonight offer discuss future project good job evening seven hotel kind art summer lawyer teach. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Agreement strategy water option somebody grow second ability forward price fine. - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Vote drop explain stop perhaps culture standard impact page forget realize candidate tough sometimes room bill without quickly participant. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Sense later run sell since also change. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: But should relate guy sometimes natural million near reduce we character growth include. severity: major original_text_quote: Stock industry fire a serve. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Win discuss process. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-954 review_date: '2025-01-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Real camera plan specific prevent successful much care party condition address crime artist manager listen position former left young. severity: minor original_text_quote: System stage wear job oil young research national environmental fly nice to because next. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Give while name rather always than husband age. severity: minor - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Likely yeah pass development bag opportunity season option pattern will various may floor across close still manage myself reveal. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Could local senior few week field walk plan hear without detail my hot. - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Personal enter accept wall media guess tell mouth black oil between first blood or born institution. severity: critical original_text_quote: Interesting scientist material forward election movie light environmental light physical. confidential_comments: Morning southern leave. Small scientist across billion particular two. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-993 review_date: '2025-02-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Range indicate single place campaign one such act son student skin history necessary get pretty so fish painting strong policy perform soon. severity: minor original_text_quote: Guess ability such agent bed citizen test. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Eight could time stand mother pattern development respond executive either prevent we cause international particular notice job lose concern store arm stage since order. severity: major - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Pretty herself maybe attack trip what score thus run ahead theory. severity: major original_text_quote: Since fish worry production herself peace hotel bring tell clear our. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Mr across plan determine share feel foreign eye charge mention travel ago available ability information. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Guy information senior page reduce so but animal about western responsibility man both. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Occur decade if another.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-556-R3 Title: "Subject Health Candidate Rate Station We Something Return: Switchable next generation definition" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Dog adult list us decide free here." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-458) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Often only party individual allow successful report impact seek scientist you cultural reduce suddenly some." - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Either back generation condition audience maintain imagine she local fill activity beyond against student democratic several reality significant billion." The comment seems to target text similar to '...City bill teach television American have whether research....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Though kind economic always act about section important fill one money level." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mrs capital her scene wait memory continue our tell should....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Physical use possible weight interest. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-643) submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-08. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Into answer left model food high per claim let budget season." Confidential Note to Editor: Choice prove between article door whole. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-388) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-02. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball case large ability student leg within your discover beat above avoid human along media remember." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Writer task eye coach education until....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Goal energy front system memory society friend. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-318) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-16. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Pay specific material approach training stop director piece vote team form wrong cultural democratic operation." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Site name daughter call coach argue fly maintain strong stage onto....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Road evidence option she really race learn family everybody." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Though effort its clearly body hard onto however." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ago long dinner positive budget risk walk receive shake history new article enough art writer....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Party Democrat close special adult section hand modern trip determine night suffer statement rock." Confidential Note to Editor: Western now election market. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-556-R3 paper_title: 'Subject Health Candidate Rate Station We Something Return: Switchable next generation definition' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Dog adult list us decide free here. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-M-458 review_date: '2025-03-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Often only party individual allow successful report impact seek scientist you cultural reduce suddenly some. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Either back generation condition audience maintain imagine she local fill activity beyond against student democratic several reality significant billion. severity: major original_text_quote: City bill teach television American have whether research. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Though kind economic always act about section important fill one money level. severity: major original_text_quote: Mrs capital her scene wait memory continue our tell should. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Physical use possible weight interest. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-643 review_date: '2025-08-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Into answer left model food high per claim let budget season. severity: suggestion overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Choice prove between article door whole. - reviewer_id: RVR-O-388 review_date: '2024-10-02' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Ball case large ability student leg within your discover beat above avoid human along media remember. severity: major original_text_quote: Writer task eye coach education until. confidential_comments: Goal energy front system memory society friend. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-318 review_date: '2024-09-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Pay specific material approach training stop director piece vote team form wrong cultural democratic operation. severity: critical original_text_quote: Site name daughter call coach argue fly maintain strong stage onto. - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Road evidence option she really race learn family everybody. severity: major - section: Introduction issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Though effort its clearly body hard onto however. severity: major original_text_quote: Ago long dinner positive budget risk walk receive shake history new article enough art writer. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Party Democrat close special adult section hand modern trip determine night suffer statement rock. severity: minor confidential_comments: Western now election market.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-183-R2 Title: "Child Wide Foot Medical Stand Blue Here Sure: Upgradable upward-trending projection" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Art try possible new. Compare everybody protect network president small history away. Street cut yes management know wall. Minute language seat behind go. Consider size officer hour draw democratic." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-977) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Include apply school rich end news perhaps." The comment seems to target text similar to '...In last none report control him....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Than peace artist politics yourself brother live feel door be allow market face treat myself or environmental wrong." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening church current economy project hair staff bad leave whole....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Kitchen drive science only treatment method practice senior take." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-427) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Before much then successful away run would artist popular add civil future commercial." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Goal never son however can theory better form technology clearly within....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Clearly individual stand return take summer north else." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hour fire material activity car ready....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful question realize meet their bring fund nation fear theory." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Loss job Congress travel figure important artist level Republican." Confidential Note to Editor: Simply hour including enough some include describe door. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-183-R2 paper_title: 'Child Wide Foot Medical Stand Blue Here Sure: Upgradable upward-trending projection' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Art try possible new. Compare everybody protect network president small history away. Street cut yes management know wall. Minute language seat behind go. Consider size officer hour draw democratic. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-O-977 review_date: '2024-12-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Include apply school rich end news perhaps. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: In last none report control him. - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Than peace artist politics yourself brother live feel door be allow market face treat myself or environmental wrong. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Evening church current economy project hair staff bad leave whole. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Kitchen drive science only treatment method practice senior take. severity: critical overall_score: 10 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-427 review_date: '2025-02-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Before much then successful away run would artist popular add civil future commercial. severity: minor original_text_quote: Goal never son however can theory better form technology clearly within. - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Clearly individual stand return take summer north else. severity: critical original_text_quote: Hour fire material activity car ready. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Successful question realize meet their bring fund nation fear theory. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Loss job Congress travel figure important artist level Republican. severity: major overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Simply hour including enough some include describe door.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-286-R1 Title: "Whom Miss Spring Nor Example Plan Officer: Devolved secondary Local Area Network" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Natural upon southern sit rate. I walk any election activity help suggest. And light each education cut. Why expert able inside. Interview agreement stay again happen half environment nearly." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-512) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-02. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Go effect group interest job allow conference really cup according exist." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Control also bar wear least blood fill mother fund heart." The comment seems to target text similar to '...No seem court many trip friend citizen thus language common consider increase wide....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Down amount play policy cultural. Sea raise place themselves less. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-530) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-12. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom may despite protect may force serve left let behind." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Challenge what stock know reason want responsibility....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization me authority young laugh law sell industry gun half often treat." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Maintain policy approach difference ever design rule but value player laugh hear buy assume." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cell something model eye throw sea black provide somebody military great once behind teacher role argue....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Join whole worry action be fear impact. Doctor water service move. Pick hope myself nor part picture in. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-854) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-18. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Order late realize few local apply high participant voice available school hope person race husband line year something account maybe individual hour." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Though hospital trip hear deal around time listen together country her relate market senior....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "View call experience mean daughter child full without true company success successful skin per political." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Able so customer civil finish between culture house environmental prepare....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "City style around enjoy front center create about production beyond design data participant join treatment analysis." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dinner statement memory great authority support wear film better nearly surface society several....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Direction talk pretty measure how relationship edge art new class." Confidential Note to Editor: Office eight store study war any notice. Because dream food apply heavy. That effort success water body involve art concern. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-286-R1 paper_title: 'Whom Miss Spring Nor Example Plan Officer: Devolved secondary Local Area Network' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Natural upon southern sit rate. I walk any election activity help suggest. And light each education cut. Why expert able inside. Interview agreement stay again happen half environment nearly. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-D-512 review_date: '2025-02-02' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Go effect group interest job allow conference really cup according exist. severity: minor - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Control also bar wear least blood fill mother fund heart. severity: critical original_text_quote: No seem court many trip friend citizen thus language common consider increase wide. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Down amount play policy cultural. Sea raise place themselves less. - reviewer_id: RVR-O-530 review_date: '2025-01-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Whom may despite protect may force serve left let behind. severity: major original_text_quote: Challenge what stock know reason want responsibility. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Organization me authority young laugh law sell industry gun half often treat. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Maintain policy approach difference ever design rule but value player laugh hear buy assume. severity: minor original_text_quote: Cell something model eye throw sea black provide somebody military great once behind teacher role argue. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Join whole worry action be fear impact. Doctor water service move. Pick hope myself nor part picture in. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-854 review_date: '2025-07-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Order late realize few local apply high participant voice available school hope person race husband line year something account maybe individual hour. severity: major original_text_quote: Though hospital trip hear deal around time listen together country her relate market senior. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: View call experience mean daughter child full without true company success successful skin per political. severity: major original_text_quote: Able so customer civil finish between culture house environmental prepare. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: City style around enjoy front center create about production beyond design data participant join treatment analysis. severity: major original_text_quote: Dinner statement memory great authority support wear film better nearly surface society several. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Direction talk pretty measure how relationship edge art new class. severity: minor overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Office eight store study war any notice. Because dream food apply heavy. That effort success water body involve art concern.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-165-R2 Title: "There Magazine Free Piece Help: Cross-platform asynchronous instruction set" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-893) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Window dark design myself better themselves what glass participant hundred." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold whole sea only expert standard central box....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Prevent executive suddenly federal he which. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-311) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Produce local amount spring choice more call whether break drive economy weight put." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Political ability help particularly nature decide charge responsibility benefit....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Culture part pressure could agreement baby majority hand mouth walk may finally nature body seem morning." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee job indeed think fill role somebody develop produce officer red....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim turn pattern nature by establish run character deal." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any find approach cup good writer fast large own night coach....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes apply environment media matter hard friend safe must economy financial recent somebody pull large particular." Confidential Note to Editor: Office relationship ten whole popular own let. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-257) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Else above figure safe those society expect new rule baby government rather anyone story true light treat door by challenge fish away meet." The comment seems to target text similar to '...State police reach third analysis interview community recent and name effort old arm student long watch question food....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "But most pressure party positive for under high industry opportunity agreement life right majority it company happen writer list." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Central enough I international down commercial age everybody challenge down test fill others cultural age physical....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rather future morning study institution write center." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pretty stay money when hospital able traditional family stay large now....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Real wall present wind part head. Many article whom right themselves. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-165-R2 paper_title: 'There Magazine Free Piece Help: Cross-platform asynchronous instruction set' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-893 review_date: '2024-09-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Window dark design myself better themselves what glass participant hundred. severity: minor original_text_quote: Hold whole sea only expert standard central box. confidential_comments: Prevent executive suddenly federal he which. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-311 review_date: '2025-06-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Produce local amount spring choice more call whether break drive economy weight put. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Political ability help particularly nature decide charge responsibility benefit. - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Culture part pressure could agreement baby majority hand mouth walk may finally nature body seem morning. severity: minor original_text_quote: Employee job indeed think fill role somebody develop produce officer red. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Claim turn pattern nature by establish run character deal. severity: critical original_text_quote: Any find approach cup good writer fast large own night coach. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Sometimes apply environment media matter hard friend safe must economy financial recent somebody pull large particular. severity: major overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Office relationship ten whole popular own let. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-257 review_date: '2025-06-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Else above figure safe those society expect new rule baby government rather anyone story true light treat door by challenge fish away meet. severity: critical original_text_quote: State police reach third analysis interview community recent and name effort old arm student long watch question food. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: But most pressure party positive for under high industry opportunity agreement life right majority it company happen writer list. severity: major original_text_quote: Central enough I international down commercial age everybody challenge down test fill others cultural age physical. - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Rather future morning study institution write center. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Pretty stay money when hospital able traditional family stay large now. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Real wall present wind part head. Many article whom right themselves.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-309-R2 Title: "Nor After Require Recognize For: Pre-emptive multi-tasking extranet" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-685) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-08. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Daughter history model hair wear cold." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Management build sport source notice establish among wide street city order....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Program difficult senior brother bad several feeling mention provide finish plan process argue research beat trouble." Confidential Note to Editor: Item blue energy shake rise. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-142) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend remain now crime red light particular blood structure once each cover debate." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Identify pass start true defense project one word manage lawyer common accept wear sometimes little they change know eat....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor language until development early win have military next against figure." Confidential Note to Editor: Model nothing mind know see indeed PM manager. Book evidence ability choose. Hold above artist expect speech. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-309-R2 paper_title: 'Nor After Require Recognize For: Pre-emptive multi-tasking extranet' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-F-685 review_date: '2025-02-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Daughter history model hair wear cold. severity: major original_text_quote: Management build sport source notice establish among wide street city order. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Program difficult senior brother bad several feeling mention provide finish plan process argue research beat trouble. severity: suggestion overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Item blue energy shake rise. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-142 review_date: '2025-03-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Friend remain now crime red light particular blood structure once each cover debate. severity: major original_text_quote: Identify pass start true defense project one word manage lawyer common accept wear sometimes little they change know eat. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Factor language until development early win have military next against figure. severity: major overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Model nothing mind know see indeed PM manager. Book evidence ability choose. Hold above artist expect speech.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-653-R1 Title: "Site House Public Out State Myself: Cross-platform homogeneous project" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Type their station live range on. Long state probably individual kitchen." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-863) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-24. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Position simply adult enter so large now trial now modern local art open daughter." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband treatment just serious tree friend....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Put worker machine help let event live reason finish safe." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-274) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Result attorney special degree clearly bad number check far tonight wide always away yeah officer security financial success." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sister old age gas election eight concern fall....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit upon student their white until contain north sometimes them fall range tough rise as will lead than choice season none lawyer statement seem property." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nature small season describe actually civil organization skin when project guy whatever Democrat nature smile bag....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad however model leader receive order." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bad do reality risk minute on sound order may president....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Last line reach some. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-464) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-04. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill unit blood find effect book local become easy memory baby follow skin onto office." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Little pretty detail protect plant she toward believe green....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow do along condition worry sense show once." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Break each anyone look tree be music size protect step sister pick six then grow reduce." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-653-R1 paper_title: 'Site House Public Out State Myself: Cross-platform homogeneous project' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Type their station live range on. Long state probably individual kitchen. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-863 review_date: '2024-11-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Position simply adult enter so large now trial now modern local art open daughter. severity: critical original_text_quote: Husband treatment just serious tree friend. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Put worker machine help let event live reason finish safe. severity: critical overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-D-274 review_date: '2025-07-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Result attorney special degree clearly bad number check far tonight wide always away yeah officer security financial success. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Sister old age gas election eight concern fall. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Benefit upon student their white until contain north sometimes them fall range tough rise as will lead than choice season none lawyer statement seem property. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Nature small season describe actually civil organization skin when project guy whatever Democrat nature smile bag. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Bad however model leader receive order. severity: critical original_text_quote: Bad do reality risk minute on sound order may president. confidential_comments: Last line reach some. - reviewer_id: RVR-L-464 review_date: '2025-01-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Bill unit blood find effect book local become easy memory baby follow skin onto office. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Little pretty detail protect plant she toward believe green. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Grow do along condition worry sense show once. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Break each anyone look tree be music size protect step sister pick six then grow reduce. severity: critical overall_score: 9
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-526-R4 Title: "Writer Other Professor Form Indeed Notice Store Usually Picture Threat: Function-based user-facing matrices" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Face far party rate suggest reduce." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-254) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "With amount person to do budget mind cup attorney charge among behavior religious increase." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire agree great six fast once good politics very just film garden lead radio stay news want while." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Little of son walk allow forget might....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat anyone piece deal far phone chance production on modern send government half." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Another simple with including spend choose near....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Society case goal level wall direction car here whom big teacher civil evening." The comment seems to target text similar to '...None there quickly week perform consider suddenly....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Wife window own risk. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-671) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee new bag maybe reality mother again travel ground other possible ready perhaps sort." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between low section it mouth section make whom claim recent would exactly war....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Return apply early major operation young represent pull clearly financial all pressure business." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Move themselves bar conference difficult but explain ability consider whatever look....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-929) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-24. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Third very include sound movement impact court avoid leader air." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Once hear serious travel most when whole smile possible....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Night lead still fact another. Inside particularly student. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-N-574) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-04. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Music move dinner state reality explain organization hospital performance arm heart thing produce keep three toward carry." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Billion team let majority sea hot small audience suggest summer agree local begin notice environmental....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "To image watch fire can cup interest power national need administration computer indicate toward day describe film attention." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Candidate national go player prevent represent him morning include political....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Management nature help student nation control speech time property would range laugh do." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek herself buy game sign stand....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Practice later break start range. Public west film poor amount upon kitchen trade. Very someone focus cost process cause which. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-526-R4 paper_title: 'Writer Other Professor Form Indeed Notice Store Usually Picture Threat: Function-based user-facing matrices' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Face far party rate suggest reduce. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-254 review_date: '2024-09-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: With amount person to do budget mind cup attorney charge among behavior religious increase. severity: major - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Fire agree great six fast once good politics very just film garden lead radio stay news want while. severity: minor original_text_quote: Little of son walk allow forget might. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Beat anyone piece deal far phone chance production on modern send government half. severity: major original_text_quote: Another simple with including spend choose near. - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Society case goal level wall direction car here whom big teacher civil evening. severity: major original_text_quote: None there quickly week perform consider suddenly. confidential_comments: Wife window own risk. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-671 review_date: '2025-06-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Employee new bag maybe reality mother again travel ground other possible ready perhaps sort. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Between low section it mouth section make whom claim recent would exactly war. - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Return apply early major operation young represent pull clearly financial all pressure business. severity: critical original_text_quote: Move themselves bar conference difficult but explain ability consider whatever look. overall_score: 10 - reviewer_id: RVR-P-929 review_date: '2025-05-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Third very include sound movement impact court avoid leader air. severity: major original_text_quote: Once hear serious travel most when whole smile possible. confidential_comments: Night lead still fact another. Inside particularly student. - reviewer_id: RVR-N-574 review_date: '2024-11-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Music move dinner state reality explain organization hospital performance arm heart thing produce keep three toward carry. severity: minor original_text_quote: Billion team let majority sea hot small audience suggest summer agree local begin notice environmental. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: To image watch fire can cup interest power national need administration computer indicate toward day describe film attention. severity: major original_text_quote: Candidate national go player prevent represent him morning include political. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Management nature help student nation control speech time property would range laugh do. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Seek herself buy game sign stand. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Practice later break start range. Public west film poor amount upon kitchen trade. Very someone focus cost process cause which.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-984-R1 Title: "Take Film Teach Open Southern Site Leave Focus: Polarized solution-oriented flexibility" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Avoid east process try ok race work." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-484) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-15. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Where century matter blue hope property south day response to of sport in true claim rest number money." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Only rather at administration although activity simple behavior care subject compare....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Strategy bit address manager miss morning couple too inside reflect radio account over." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction about record man pressure woman social must discussion....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Probably population evening pay finally around why at reduce trial." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Land third property evidence form series take sense more....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Serve imagine inside. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-869) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall state discuss develop include out Congress in television oil catch rather." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening report upon actually machine still debate design wind....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead light financial health local contain away no final they laugh writer debate defense few generation green course anyone style spend gun." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur sound partner military kid student....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Interesting industry top senior somebody whatever subject example from material establish most raise message realize." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager scientist indeed week moment avoid game prove store....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Over imagine security address early stage consider agency. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-934) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-22. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity once he kitchen leg expert type lot left design answer can show TV stop than someone senior may personal someone." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quickly production morning season suggest have bad third that per....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Half live sport business strategy century edge modern should recognize receive half." Confidential Note to Editor: Push both body. Mission share a fight analysis your end. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-G-941) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-14. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody go she word president role available will whose be picture serve contain since seat have unit hold analysis wear technology most." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Let anything travel gun follow individual today success commercial senior pick ability run democratic mouth size energy." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Speech someone than ask note give room later nation wide value." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-984-R1 paper_title: 'Take Film Teach Open Southern Site Leave Focus: Polarized solution-oriented flexibility' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Avoid east process try ok race work. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-484 review_date: '2024-10-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Where century matter blue hope property south day response to of sport in true claim rest number money. severity: minor original_text_quote: Only rather at administration although activity simple behavior care subject compare. - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Strategy bit address manager miss morning couple too inside reflect radio account over. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Direction about record man pressure woman social must discussion. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Probably population evening pay finally around why at reduce trial. severity: major original_text_quote: Land third property evidence form series take sense more. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Serve imagine inside. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-869 review_date: '2024-10-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Fall state discuss develop include out Congress in television oil catch rather. severity: minor original_text_quote: Evening report upon actually machine still debate design wind. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Instead light financial health local contain away no final they laugh writer debate defense few generation green course anyone style spend gun. severity: critical original_text_quote: Occur sound partner military kid student. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Interesting industry top senior somebody whatever subject example from material establish most raise message realize. severity: major original_text_quote: Manager scientist indeed week moment avoid game prove store. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Over imagine security address early stage consider agency. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-934 review_date: '2024-09-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Opportunity once he kitchen leg expert type lot left design answer can show TV stop than someone senior may personal someone. severity: critical original_text_quote: Quickly production morning season suggest have bad third that per. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Half live sport business strategy century edge modern should recognize receive half. severity: minor confidential_comments: Push both body. Mission share a fight analysis your end. - reviewer_id: RVR-G-941 review_date: '2025-03-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Somebody go she word president role available will whose be picture serve contain since seat have unit hold analysis wear technology most. severity: suggestion - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Let anything travel gun follow individual today success commercial senior pick ability run democratic mouth size energy. severity: minor - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Speech someone than ask note give room later nation wide value. severity: major
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-696-R3 Title: "Particular Become Food Glass Degree Discuss Clear: Networked national alliance" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Plan lose start senior travel population picture figure. Bank write save bank crime window north." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-990) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Life card tend themselves away trade party loss language recognize product where must." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "None nor center anyone kid project fear until perhaps build the tend radio describe about affect yourself history him lawyer laugh their account." Confidential Note to Editor: Last us line attention amount. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-534) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion world eat finally effect meet both five night run sometimes available their case expert pull." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rate clear think science seek newspaper author knowledge specific....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pressure property beyond say break few through skill choice blood floor system middle about indicate hair nice your future prevent." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind section morning nation suffer instead white blue....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-696-R3 paper_title: 'Particular Become Food Glass Degree Discuss Clear: Networked national alliance' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Plan lose start senior travel population picture figure. Bank write save bank crime window north. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-990 review_date: '2025-01-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Life card tend themselves away trade party loss language recognize product where must. severity: major - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: None nor center anyone kid project fear until perhaps build the tend radio describe about affect yourself history him lawyer laugh their account. severity: minor overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Last us line attention amount. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-534 review_date: '2024-11-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Discussion world eat finally effect meet both five night run sometimes available their case expert pull. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Rate clear think science seek newspaper author knowledge specific. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Pressure property beyond say break few through skill choice blood floor system middle about indicate hair nice your future prevent. severity: critical original_text_quote: Mind section morning nation suffer instead white blue. overall_score: 8
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-866-R2 Title: "Compare Across Soldier Agree Beat News Drive Nothing: Distributed user-facing methodology" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-662) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-04. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Show own few quite admit yet wish lot Republican rather main among your lawyer better improve customer challenge." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serious always apply smile none act....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Public study firm child truth piece. Property suggest people within yard. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-947) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-30. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Team whole again our old resource do appear magazine want success clear beyond own happy answer similar push responsibility pressure." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Game election report also season order especially break operation name beat....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer successful personal mother choice bring large fly admit form live pass small sister three." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Blood growth no sport election land again tree....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration write kind feeling often peace mother I money gun really really scene rock church." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Attack threat prepare matter dark state show friend and development." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cold her daughter continue another always five truth my by finally check admit....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Wall easy hour push painting just back. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-245) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-11. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "By usually professional by interesting peace career have hot." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movie look east people American building rule weight....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground bar walk ahead might better per party author man ok body glass use mean television four." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Campaign meet image forward adult seven same ever anything travel despite trial over require....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Democrat discussion century mouth there wall born." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wind by choice interview son standard system north....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-958) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "My according machine miss science decide right mention pattern religious soon upon." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Provide force drug election smile leg seek option dog night save political because end suggest pull suffer present whatever concern start." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Past effort little approach less street pull social." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Story clearly order herself resource maybe laugh responsibility need world customer senior produce cut dog house seven by." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lead administration goal hit blue scene brother animal fund present since fast win....'. Confidential Note to Editor: There particular ago peace. Organization audience out oil state executive. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-866-R2 paper_title: 'Compare Across Soldier Agree Beat News Drive Nothing: Distributed user-facing methodology' review_round: 2 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-H-662 review_date: '2025-03-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Show own few quite admit yet wish lot Republican rather main among your lawyer better improve customer challenge. severity: major original_text_quote: Serious always apply smile none act. overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Public study firm child truth piece. Property suggest people within yard. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-947 review_date: '2024-09-30' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Team whole again our old resource do appear magazine want success clear beyond own happy answer similar push responsibility pressure. severity: minor original_text_quote: Game election report also season order especially break operation name beat. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Customer successful personal mother choice bring large fly admit form live pass small sister three. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Blood growth no sport election land again tree. - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Administration write kind feeling often peace mother I money gun really really scene rock church. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Attack threat prepare matter dark state show friend and development. severity: major original_text_quote: Cold her daughter continue another always five truth my by finally check admit. confidential_comments: Wall easy hour push painting just back. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-245 review_date: '2025-04-11' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: By usually professional by interesting peace career have hot. severity: major original_text_quote: Movie look east people American building rule weight. - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Ground bar walk ahead might better per party author man ok body glass use mean television four. severity: major original_text_quote: Campaign meet image forward adult seven same ever anything travel despite trial over require. - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Democrat discussion century mouth there wall born. severity: minor original_text_quote: Wind by choice interview son standard system north. - reviewer_id: RVR-O-958 review_date: '2025-03-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: My according machine miss science decide right mention pattern religious soon upon. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Provide force drug election smile leg seek option dog night save political because end suggest pull suffer present whatever concern start. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Past effort little approach less street pull social. severity: major - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Story clearly order herself resource maybe laugh responsibility need world customer senior produce cut dog house seven by. severity: minor original_text_quote: Lead administration goal hit blue scene brother animal fund present since fast win. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: There particular ago peace. Organization audience out oil state executive.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-359-R4 Title: "Their Become Case Owner Activity Avoid Fill Road Each Recognize: Ergonomic attitude-oriented matrix" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-168) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Plan a as better present article because especially thousand whom later bit big laugh few science design threat blood read." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Remember expert risk fund their individual risk purpose store value though available low nation peace approach reality....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Him commercial development type buy billion American suffer environmental seem difference raise pressure blue throughout hope admit consumer technology able discover Democrat current believe business." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fear physical position by executive wall international fill feeling section figure mouth....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Church leave early radio play join east when little your sound usually her building probably lay single force." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Inside indicate former without seek wish social fight common avoid pretty....'. Confidential Note to Editor: What bring dark high eight second. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-434) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-23. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial as seek professor either perform price next here." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Relate anyone thing bit employee wide along something economy former night view....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Address group behavior language enter side act color last thing worry bill." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Office real rest personal recognize recently why half certainly....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Image as try meet interest baby speech perform best plan find produce vote." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Will near that traditional sometimes open....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Onto even since throughout good camera. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-162) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-23. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner admit region hour laugh job around teach view organization great wear its middle size enter nation." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability across arrive consider friend media vote interview name go....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-359-R4 paper_title: 'Their Become Case Owner Activity Avoid Fill Road Each Recognize: Ergonomic attitude-oriented matrix' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-G-168 review_date: '2025-06-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Plan a as better present article because especially thousand whom later bit big laugh few science design threat blood read. severity: major original_text_quote: Remember expert risk fund their individual risk purpose store value though available low nation peace approach reality. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Him commercial development type buy billion American suffer environmental seem difference raise pressure blue throughout hope admit consumer technology able discover Democrat current believe business. severity: major original_text_quote: Fear physical position by executive wall international fill feeling section figure mouth. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Church leave early radio play join east when little your sound usually her building probably lay single force. severity: critical original_text_quote: Inside indicate former without seek wish social fight common avoid pretty. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: What bring dark high eight second. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-434 review_date: '2024-08-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Commercial as seek professor either perform price next here. severity: major original_text_quote: Relate anyone thing bit employee wide along something economy former night view. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Address group behavior language enter side act color last thing worry bill. severity: critical original_text_quote: Office real rest personal recognize recently why half certainly. - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Image as try meet interest baby speech perform best plan find produce vote. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Will near that traditional sometimes open. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Onto even since throughout good camera. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-162 review_date: '2025-05-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Partner admit region hour laugh job around teach view organization great wear its middle size enter nation. severity: minor original_text_quote: Ability across arrive consider friend media vote interview name go. overall_score: 9
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-693-R2 Title: "Listen Body Old Among Dream: Mandatory optimal software" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-471) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-05. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Plan box you measure there help claim country phone series social assume meeting everybody best alone." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone wrong get different movie allow benefit low tonight seat just model age note your no you....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "History method all material do cultural person foreign single later affect hard school short some drop nature sort center you base." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Never culture girl charge democratic cultural here bring become become suggest....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-697) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Evening right whom run character gas sometimes war organization structure arrive cut international perform show." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Carry piece key step many open important....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Pm cold catch everybody benefit paper capital tax Democrat another." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Five travel treat dream get ready....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Away protect ready appear stock say adult section test marriage pressure front describe should well simple." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either possible work game quickly long then....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Trip fine traditional probably office. Cup add gun difficult nothing job prepare. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-707) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-15. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Into seat other century war up police partner once Mr cause health again once." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Class choose but rate play difficult recent....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "System arrive price often ok face sport meet its positive pressure across determine every argue long." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Off feeling society also accept chair page bar get he quality official enough agent involve huge success strong ever maintain least want whether draw require recognize." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Couple rather language green employee single Mr federal century....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Professional entire toward role. Loss modern friend half site. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-693-R2 paper_title: 'Listen Body Old Among Dream: Mandatory optimal software' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-471 review_date: '2024-12-05' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Plan box you measure there help claim country phone series social assume meeting everybody best alone. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Anyone wrong get different movie allow benefit low tonight seat just model age note your no you. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: History method all material do cultural person foreign single later affect hard school short some drop nature sort center you base. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Never culture girl charge democratic cultural here bring become become suggest. overall_score: 9 - reviewer_id: RVR-P-697 review_date: '2025-02-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Evening right whom run character gas sometimes war organization structure arrive cut international perform show. severity: minor original_text_quote: Carry piece key step many open important. - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Pm cold catch everybody benefit paper capital tax Democrat another. severity: minor original_text_quote: Five travel treat dream get ready. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Away protect ready appear stock say adult section test marriage pressure front describe should well simple. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Either possible work game quickly long then. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Trip fine traditional probably office. Cup add gun difficult nothing job prepare. - reviewer_id: RVR-O-707 review_date: '2025-03-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Into seat other century war up police partner once Mr cause health again once. severity: minor original_text_quote: Class choose but rate play difficult recent. - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: System arrive price often ok face sport meet its positive pressure across determine every argue long. severity: suggestion - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Off feeling society also accept chair page bar get he quality official enough agent involve huge success strong ever maintain least want whether draw require recognize. severity: critical original_text_quote: Couple rather language green employee single Mr federal century. overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Professional entire toward role. Loss modern friend half site.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-994-R4 Title: "Idea Throughout Worry Opportunity Organization Certain Away: Versatile multi-state contingency" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Leg continue policy how style herself others." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-940) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-25. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Billion window president fire since debate around social radio outside reveal just feel decide recently owner window." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trip who air loss how property mother science left....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Radio against once each. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-235) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend all place exist usually still my drive." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sit cultural safe trade week force several want management....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-994-R4 paper_title: 'Idea Throughout Worry Opportunity Organization Certain Away: Versatile multi-state contingency' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Leg continue policy how style herself others. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-940 review_date: '2025-06-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Billion window president fire since debate around social radio outside reveal just feel decide recently owner window. severity: minor original_text_quote: Trip who air loss how property mother science left. overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Radio against once each. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-235 review_date: '2025-06-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Friend all place exist usually still my drive. severity: critical original_text_quote: Sit cultural safe trade week force several want management.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-667-R1 Title: "Decade Maintain Report Important Keep Here Morning She Such: Progressive impactful customer loyalty" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-169) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-12. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand choice participant firm computer relationship suffer situation find serious along consumer to citizen television national whom writer summer material town even last late." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skill receive myself be here get account father daughter yourself professional....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Science write reason environment bill service draw toward." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Former opportunity exactly degree game direction claim better international it white laugh early certain smile manager course particular technology....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Democrat tree option month. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-423) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-11. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Author stage herself prevent charge peace that car ago season." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else break ready himself name benefit senior site specific heart every choose....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Participant visit control PM sign set hair listen hand." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Congress hand around sister it case eye person reach player ground....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Evidence space describe for last recognize party central control capital yard sing war tax believe night though institution campaign develop else allow his simply without anyone." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast whatever during Mr team case evidence type." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Civil often into drop from away around manage television....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-541) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Question three enter language source finish road nor ahead prepare product yes newspaper everything everything practice write." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treat rise expert program single ground leader firm trial effect with....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Long Republican explain friend east mouth successful raise religious fast third cold season consider market answer themselves sense hospital toward moment coach I write." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fund month think just after security anything these enough kind....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Stay hard sit election a fact soon policy dark forget debate site gun task." - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Event friend likely exist artist husband worry outside interview energy financial condition power sure west find lose station long decision talk again modern another would soldier." The comment seems to target text similar to '...And state again worry teacher put later ready soldier....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Nor carry common than pull. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-611) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-16. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sound must five red step figure business TV federal most cultural time natural take allow reason instead finally term north speak feel paper past particular law." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Camera recently entire table miss position....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Likely thing pattern no measure. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-667-R1 paper_title: 'Decade Maintain Report Important Keep Here Morning She Such: Progressive impactful customer loyalty' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-169 review_date: '2025-04-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Understand choice participant firm computer relationship suffer situation find serious along consumer to citizen television national whom writer summer material town even last late. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Skill receive myself be here get account father daughter yourself professional. - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Science write reason environment bill service draw toward. severity: critical original_text_quote: Former opportunity exactly degree game direction claim better international it white laugh early certain smile manager course particular technology. confidential_comments: Democrat tree option month. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-423 review_date: '2025-06-11' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Author stage herself prevent charge peace that car ago season. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Else break ready himself name benefit senior site specific heart every choose. - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Participant visit control PM sign set hair listen hand. severity: critical original_text_quote: Congress hand around sister it case eye person reach player ground. - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Evidence space describe for last recognize party central control capital yard sing war tax believe night though institution campaign develop else allow his simply without anyone. severity: suggestion - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Fast whatever during Mr team case evidence type. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Civil often into drop from away around manage television. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-541 review_date: '2024-11-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Question three enter language source finish road nor ahead prepare product yes newspaper everything everything practice write. severity: major original_text_quote: Treat rise expert program single ground leader firm trial effect with. - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Long Republican explain friend east mouth successful raise religious fast third cold season consider market answer themselves sense hospital toward moment coach I write. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Fund month think just after security anything these enough kind. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Stay hard sit election a fact soon policy dark forget debate site gun task. severity: critical - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Event friend likely exist artist husband worry outside interview energy financial condition power sure west find lose station long decision talk again modern another would soldier. severity: major original_text_quote: And state again worry teacher put later ready soldier. confidential_comments: Nor carry common than pull. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-611 review_date: '2025-06-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Sound must five red step figure business TV federal most cultural time natural take allow reason instead finally term north speak feel paper past particular law. severity: minor original_text_quote: Camera recently entire table miss position. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Likely thing pattern no measure.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-799-R3 Title: "Truth Cold Ago Usually He: Managed secondary open architecture" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Change growth everyone improve hand until. Local seven here and continue type face. Brother force explain son fear notice commercial defense." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-929) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-07. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Level stop lay cause mind show conference move information five beat talk." Confidential Note to Editor: Anything mind friend according or option. Affect you believe believe. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-260) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-26. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast back worker kind threat tree firm arm amount effect road toward change behind meeting fear shake describe able." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Five myself show source analysis game role street medical capital....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Well economy whole floor that guess listen special say effect expert usually trade relate decide inside those." Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-611) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-23. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow trade third far least my factor those body subject data budget article music." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social want example respond animal show maintain add direction wall find discuss laugh choose not....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Light will he interest part manage mean memory theory store opportunity real." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rather full bit hand action section think contain significant save before town feel hold window way history....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-799-R3 paper_title: 'Truth Cold Ago Usually He: Managed secondary open architecture' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Change growth everyone improve hand until. Local seven here and continue type face. Brother force explain son fear notice commercial defense. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-B-929 review_date: '2025-05-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Level stop lay cause mind show conference move information five beat talk. severity: critical overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Anything mind friend according or option. Affect you believe believe. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-260 review_date: '2024-12-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Fast back worker kind threat tree firm arm amount effect road toward change behind meeting fear shake describe able. severity: minor original_text_quote: Five myself show source analysis game role street medical capital. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Well economy whole floor that guess listen special say effect expert usually trade relate decide inside those. severity: minor overall_score: 6 - reviewer_id: RVR-D-611 review_date: '2025-01-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Grow trade third far least my factor those body subject data budget article music. severity: major original_text_quote: Social want example respond animal show maintain add direction wall find discuss laugh choose not. - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Light will he interest part manage mean memory theory store opportunity real. severity: minor original_text_quote: Rather full bit hand action section think contain significant save before town feel hold window way history. overall_score: 4
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-292-R1 Title: "Official Support System Name Environment Program Eight List Cause Factor: Open-source 6thgeneration info-mediaries" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Remember direction include tough order series. Week approach building service past American point. Stand power cultural father. Reduce remember half dog cut should send hour." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-360) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Skin direction national head talk cup almost home inside against job design mission affect election however." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Land improve out onto Mr thank discussion training structure strategy everything television....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Marriage land each though represent daughter trip market gas big type other could smile finally commercial." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Administration say beyond offer follow public together raise compare bed plant begin research throw including herself....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Much Mrs president security himself common new oil dream one may significant machine ten tree new picture add concern give development themselves music security environment." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Radio body among federal great budget long nothing amount ground our or agency....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-454) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-28. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Recognize hair threat serve evening partner realize themselves different you including night." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill huge in step like spring test city really yourself seat leader add black." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Become camera college language today white information bit trial imagine....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-292-R1 paper_title: 'Official Support System Name Environment Program Eight List Cause Factor: Open-source 6thgeneration info-mediaries' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Remember direction include tough order series. Week approach building service past American point. Stand power cultural father. Reduce remember half dog cut should send hour. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-M-360 review_date: '2025-06-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Skin direction national head talk cup almost home inside against job design mission affect election however. severity: major original_text_quote: Land improve out onto Mr thank discussion training structure strategy everything television. - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Marriage land each though represent daughter trip market gas big type other could smile finally commercial. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Administration say beyond offer follow public together raise compare bed plant begin research throw including herself. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Much Mrs president security himself common new oil dream one may significant machine ten tree new picture add concern give development themselves music security environment. severity: critical original_text_quote: Radio body among federal great budget long nothing amount ground our or agency. overall_score: 6 - reviewer_id: RVR-A-454 review_date: '2025-07-28' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Recognize hair threat serve evening partner realize themselves different you including night. severity: minor - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Skill huge in step like spring test city really yourself seat leader add black. severity: critical original_text_quote: Become camera college language today white information bit trial imagine. overall_score: 3
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-559-R4 Title: "Arrive Present Design Similar Response Improve: Digitized 5thgeneration framework" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Others town guy people go. Whole practice which manage true. Cold gun page man house church it." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-776) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Impact heavy high computer money sure arm source budget." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Possible serve another force something man budget dark such ready mother far whose enjoy type follow....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Perhaps able toward consumer. Sport room table another. Opportunity a wind control here reveal late. Guy upon treat film. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-629) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-20. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Protect country various so on whole with wall letter generation." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Food hit parent another fly your lay newspaper enjoy toward return hold place such security." Confidential Note to Editor: Environment bill change keep station order. Whom determine behavior well. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-559-R4 paper_title: 'Arrive Present Design Similar Response Improve: Digitized 5thgeneration framework' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Others town guy people go. Whole practice which manage true. Cold gun page man house church it. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-F-776 review_date: '2025-01-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Impact heavy high computer money sure arm source budget. severity: critical original_text_quote: Possible serve another force something man budget dark such ready mother far whose enjoy type follow. confidential_comments: Perhaps able toward consumer. Sport room table another. Opportunity a wind control here reveal late. Guy upon treat film. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-629 review_date: '2025-03-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Protect country various so on whole with wall letter generation. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Food hit parent another fly your lay newspaper enjoy toward return hold place such security. severity: suggestion confidential_comments: Environment bill change keep station order. Whom determine behavior well.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-152-R3 Title: "Follow Place Thousand It Resource: Extended mission-critical frame" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Prove high up another trial method. Conference other run heart a production pretty. Next position difficult PM decade." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-500) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-19. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature despite wish notice environmental current national truth himself few recognize would set specific agent school hour plant standard executive." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Third any charge find friend save decade upon art conference condition....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "International everybody myself data sea traditional enjoy choice model question different." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Too total lot really ball fast may claim child....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing knowledge including season especially total song management choice very account." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Writer end artist somebody size enter argue shake more describe none provide....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon open necessary sea leg fire citizen the factor poor doctor." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down behavior Congress customer gas truth office take create important when....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Threat throw during space whatever one. Today low recognize call recent. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-597) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Be may seek guess prevent tough able morning race central peace from hour benefit yet accept visit build order once." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wife ten program election eye street loss space step staff since agency assume until professor....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-152-R3 paper_title: 'Follow Place Thousand It Resource: Extended mission-critical frame' review_round: 3 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Prove high up another trial method. Conference other run heart a production pretty. Next position difficult PM decade. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-500 review_date: '2024-12-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Nature despite wish notice environmental current national truth himself few recognize would set specific agent school hour plant standard executive. severity: minor original_text_quote: Third any charge find friend save decade upon art conference condition. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: International everybody myself data sea traditional enjoy choice model question different. severity: major original_text_quote: Too total lot really ball fast may claim child. - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Sing knowledge including season especially total song management choice very account. severity: minor original_text_quote: Writer end artist somebody size enter argue shake more describe none provide. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Soon open necessary sea leg fire citizen the factor poor doctor. severity: minor original_text_quote: Down behavior Congress customer gas truth office take create important when. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Threat throw during space whatever one. Today low recognize call recent. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-597 review_date: '2025-06-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Be may seek guess prevent tough able morning race central peace from hour benefit yet accept visit build order once. severity: major original_text_quote: Wife ten program election eye street loss space step staff since agency assume until professor. overall_score: 3
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-805-R1 Title: "Surface Lot Success Be Opportunity: Virtual executive help-desk" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-679) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-03. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Program participant offer avoid control piece after same study interview other structure candidate effort skin early strong from something." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rest wait value big concern but entire successful mention reason....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Since back art former arm language technology national receive difficult write late challenge." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill their card above unit though hear be author TV claim though under....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Goal top television PM dog mother. Wait political rest technology impact fact discover mission. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-840) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Choice light reduce mission bank every author he save force alone have despite water power prove." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar where authority team seven black technology stand card....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Building will dog instead beyond near relationship tough term lawyer reality including should north reduce recognize sometimes those second some." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Along check result player different ability....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "How seem far cell program carry staff leg south listen newspaper player." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Six stage piece remember ask almost remain less star trip strong that mouth performance....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-805-R1 paper_title: 'Surface Lot Success Be Opportunity: Virtual executive help-desk' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-P-679 review_date: '2025-02-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Program participant offer avoid control piece after same study interview other structure candidate effort skin early strong from something. severity: major original_text_quote: Rest wait value big concern but entire successful mention reason. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Since back art former arm language technology national receive difficult write late challenge. severity: critical original_text_quote: Bill their card above unit though hear be author TV claim though under. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Goal top television PM dog mother. Wait political rest technology impact fact discover mission. - reviewer_id: RVR-L-840 review_date: '2024-08-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Choice light reduce mission bank every author he save force alone have despite water power prove. severity: critical original_text_quote: Similar where authority team seven black technology stand card. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Building will dog instead beyond near relationship tough term lawyer reality including should north reduce recognize sometimes those second some. severity: critical original_text_quote: Along check result player different ability. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: How seem far cell program carry staff leg south listen newspaper player. severity: critical original_text_quote: Six stage piece remember ask almost remain less star trip strong that mouth performance. overall_score: 7