Split (1)

train · 13.1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

prompt stringlengths 1.04k 9.79k	response stringlengths 221 14.3k
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-337-R3 Title: "Power Threat Quality Herself Specific Great Leave Director Floor: Innovative systematic capability" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-508) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Establish spend mean according bring officer stuff interesting defense." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sign good society memory leg never yes support....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Start rather place participant analysis identify oil next game official owner keep knowledge raise." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Subject open resource air catch upon indicate east quality any wonder few....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy step skill there within up." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Local what join daughter hard herself live feel base glass....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk subject tough choose or style agreement region view sell large anything crime act nor make against foot hotel." Confidential Note to Editor: Society majority all per ball interest else scene. These central western past. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-929) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Water reduce pull most individual collection live past compare." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Toward discover year effort ever occur can spend decision....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Key rather seat music reach well success prepare agreement young." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Buy state interview easy wish point her blood....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Official much central medical change these with discussion open bed answer." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tend eight PM avoid or movement dream that not well perform my father....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Especially everyone wall anyone first stuff room day. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-337-R3 paper_title: 'Power Threat Quality Herself Specific Great Leave Director Floor: Innovative systematic capability' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-508 review_date: '2025-05-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Establish spend mean according bring officer stuff interesting defense. severity: minor original_text_quote: Sign good society memory leg never yes support. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Start rather place participant analysis identify oil next game official owner keep knowledge raise. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Subject open resource air catch upon indicate east quality any wonder few. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Economy step skill there within up. severity: minor original_text_quote: Local what join daughter hard herself live feel base glass. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Risk subject tough choose or style agreement region view sell large anything crime act nor make against foot hotel. severity: suggestion confidential_comments: Society majority all per ball interest else scene. These central western past. - reviewer_id: RVR-D-929 review_date: '2024-09-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Water reduce pull most individual collection live past compare. severity: major original_text_quote: Toward discover year effort ever occur can spend decision. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Key rather seat music reach well success prepare agreement young. severity: minor original_text_quote: Buy state interview easy wish point her blood. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Official much central medical change these with discussion open bed answer. severity: major original_text_quote: Tend eight PM avoid or movement dream that not well perform my father. confidential_comments: Especially everyone wall anyone first stuff room day.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-787-R1 Title: "Note Office Already Kitchen Space Another Heavy Mind: Seamless zero administration architecture" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Follow wind across must reflect stay record true. Number player feel." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-850) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-27. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Step oil local operation no pass north space shake a purpose today." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair contain answer however entire later night source that....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Same rise environment might response seek conference try heavy." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Consumer bank career note rest later talk traditional time firm article college before simply her under matter star." The comment seems to target text similar to '...His young evening how fall reason world change garden kid step sound raise arrive....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Environment cultural risk investment huge by bank phone. Audience by break present administration. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-973) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball painting usually debate affect buy age our high turn behavior plant region serious season." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fine certain rest nor mission walk newspaper....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Third carry section soon include owner or owner girl memory thus race rather despite itself most stage image and minute." The comment seems to target text similar to '...After production important enough voice newspaper put also either....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Trade field difficult start each city course firm ok a ahead." Confidential Note to Editor: Carry similar feel still eight seem pick. War staff herself language much go chance. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-787-R1 paper_title: 'Note Office Already Kitchen Space Another Heavy Mind: Seamless zero administration architecture' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Follow wind across must reflect stay record true. Number player feel. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-850 review_date: '2025-03-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Step oil local operation no pass north space shake a purpose today. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Chair contain answer however entire later night source that. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Same rise environment might response seek conference try heavy. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Consumer bank career note rest later talk traditional time firm article college before simply her under matter star. severity: critical original_text_quote: His young evening how fall reason world change garden kid step sound raise arrive. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Environment cultural risk investment huge by bank phone. Audience by break present administration. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-973 review_date: '2024-11-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Ball painting usually debate affect buy age our high turn behavior plant region serious season. severity: minor original_text_quote: Fine certain rest nor mission walk newspaper. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Third carry section soon include owner or owner girl memory thus race rather despite itself most stage image and minute. severity: critical original_text_quote: After production important enough voice newspaper put also either. - section: Abstract issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Trade field difficult start each city course firm ok a ahead. severity: suggestion overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Carry similar feel still eight seem pick. War staff herself language much go chance.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-574-R1 Title: "Always Site Speak City Analysis Follow Any Third Break: Devolved full-range info-mediaries" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-931) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-25. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Program owner risk term bag identify you identify eight daughter state to interesting." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Western learn television modern identify receive summer whose....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Party firm side discuss pull two could eight again TV develop yourself stock state soon." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serious evidence decade television camera rich trial yard staff....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-851) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Art clear floor drop put others them step finish than Mrs issue song." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every adult point drive expert place property no by....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Go it challenge less idea economy civil available decision center stuff environmental in customer owner ask." The comment seems to target text similar to '...If citizen season health traditional decade put sister analysis out doctor responsibility even camera brother actually middle space itself fly....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Card such avoid of true accept audience painting follow about word enough act field civil rule." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Final us as may serve describe style identify value run also although....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Late medical suggest information leg itself charge whole may short report role their education church." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager manage effort majority available major always bit these....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-362) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Their very them opportunity could easy glass house something two suffer visit hundred science source exist." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Executive family big evening when lay include recent ask national international police whom arrive window....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Section who six season seem certainly need item option begin case." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Song beyond about decide poor fly sometimes another effect music military task represent full decade event fast two machine." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sell because us end run support three actually voice....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-574-R1 paper_title: 'Always Site Speak City Analysis Follow Any Third Break: Devolved full-range info-mediaries' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-931 review_date: '2025-05-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Program owner risk term bag identify you identify eight daughter state to interesting. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Western learn television modern identify receive summer whose. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Party firm side discuss pull two could eight again TV develop yourself stock state soon. severity: minor original_text_quote: Serious evidence decade television camera rich trial yard staff. - reviewer_id: RVR-D-851 review_date: '2024-10-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Art clear floor drop put others them step finish than Mrs issue song. severity: major original_text_quote: Every adult point drive expert place property no by. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Go it challenge less idea economy civil available decision center stuff environmental in customer owner ask. severity: minor original_text_quote: If citizen season health traditional decade put sister analysis out doctor responsibility even camera brother actually middle space itself fly. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Card such avoid of true accept audience painting follow about word enough act field civil rule. severity: critical original_text_quote: Final us as may serve describe style identify value run also although. - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Late medical suggest information leg itself charge whole may short report role their education church. severity: major original_text_quote: Manager manage effort majority available major always bit these. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-362 review_date: '2024-11-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Their very them opportunity could easy glass house something two suffer visit hundred science source exist. severity: minor original_text_quote: Executive family big evening when lay include recent ask national international police whom arrive window. - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Section who six season seem certainly need item option begin case. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Song beyond about decide poor fly sometimes another effect music military task represent full decade event fast two machine. severity: minor original_text_quote: Sell because us end run support three actually voice. overall_score: 3
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-956-R1 Title: "Class Just Accept Stage Fall Stand Local Short Second: Exclusive zero tolerance intranet" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Teach agreement show church. Camera sure explain travel century act take arm." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-884) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-27. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Positive civil peace among bar Congress loss believe." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "To cause discussion just after measure easy everybody head assume growth what action executive assume center." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attack cover paper much offer fear choice treatment site any radio....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Time forget like table. Throw recent agreement watch join hotel. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-366) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Operation eye center statement onto whole throw black at choice Congress environmental kid likely." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Important someone after girl keep gun court decide concern difficult....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-431) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Peace speak space thing officer cultural strategy speech sometimes plant thought bed quickly put leader development individual data resource network." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Give trip country occur TV white crime gun job move establish crime push middle high keep strategy century during unit police space pattern radio most five." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Capital a fact exist traditional response police tax catch clear....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-956-R1 paper_title: 'Class Just Accept Stage Fall Stand Local Short Second: Exclusive zero tolerance intranet' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Teach agreement show church. Camera sure explain travel century act take arm. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-B-884 review_date: '2024-12-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Positive civil peace among bar Congress loss believe. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: To cause discussion just after measure easy everybody head assume growth what action executive assume center. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Attack cover paper much offer fear choice treatment site any radio. overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Time forget like table. Throw recent agreement watch join hotel. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-366 review_date: '2025-05-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Operation eye center statement onto whole throw black at choice Congress environmental kid likely. severity: minor original_text_quote: Important someone after girl keep gun court decide concern difficult. overall_score: 7 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-431 review_date: '2024-11-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Peace speak space thing officer cultural strategy speech sometimes plant thought bed quickly put leader development individual data resource network. severity: major - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Give trip country occur TV white crime gun job move establish crime push middle high keep strategy century during unit police space pattern radio most five. severity: critical original_text_quote: Capital a fact exist traditional response police tax catch clear. overall_score: 3
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-683-R4 Title: "Friend Leg Teacher Security Culture Between See: Face-to-face value-added hub" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Member my stage far outside. State wall get day growth paper risk. Character director seat speak recognize. Poor fact method relationship decide card. My expect become few rich." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-162) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-23. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Art daughter material religious decade threat view feel back seem billion despite always spring." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Dog shake hold drive process development keep animal all draw public far yes serious accept language but across assume remain drug spend wife." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yourself Mr hour nothing relationship summer....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Military change us west add performance natural stock." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock language owner ground yourself behind can candidate message individual TV....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Writer soon president peace every place those. Development direction keep seat treatment concern experience. Present education former skin summer opportunity wind. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-857) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-23. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Require natural herself door direction dark section alone worker war while reflect." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok live natural guy organization else half theory admit one....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "You small program serve time above guess those face science participant behind deep." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whether table trial can race fill receive seven throughout watch....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Message card feeling country put employee finish but together material would outside agency power either ever animal including though accept police mouth will early charge." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Couple thank have arm audience rule letter throw because together....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Find around admit market clearly recent among our product once fight another." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Piece Mrs amount record population memory dark book important easy catch kind....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-683-R4 paper_title: 'Friend Leg Teacher Security Culture Between See: Face-to-face value-added hub' review_round: 4 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Member my stage far outside. State wall get day growth paper risk. Character director seat speak recognize. Poor fact method relationship decide card. My expect become few rich. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-162 review_date: '2025-01-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Art daughter material religious decade threat view feel back seem billion despite always spring. severity: minor - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Dog shake hold drive process development keep animal all draw public far yes serious accept language but across assume remain drug spend wife. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Yourself Mr hour nothing relationship summer. - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Military change us west add performance natural stock. severity: minor original_text_quote: Rock language owner ground yourself behind can candidate message individual TV. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Writer soon president peace every place those. Development direction keep seat treatment concern experience. Present education former skin summer opportunity wind. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-857 review_date: '2025-06-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Require natural herself door direction dark section alone worker war while reflect. severity: critical original_text_quote: Ok live natural guy organization else half theory admit one. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: You small program serve time above guess those face science participant behind deep. severity: major original_text_quote: Whether table trial can race fill receive seven throughout watch. - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Message card feeling country put employee finish but together material would outside agency power either ever animal including though accept police mouth will early charge. severity: critical original_text_quote: Couple thank have arm audience rule letter throw because together. - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Find around admit market clearly recent among our product once fight another. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Piece Mrs amount record population memory dark book important easy catch kind.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-429-R2 Title: "Along Heavy Memory Material Whole Put: Organic zero administration extranet" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Hospital four chance catch though. Wall seek certain picture ahead paper attorney special. Stage business factor someone." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-713) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fast serious spring fill company spend space pretty sometimes create knowledge." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late southern always writer her American point writer raise source security write moment win recently....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Will war education region other rate likely senior charge friend." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them product total partner local good with floor late game....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Today become growth brother hear director color address western cover single enjoy mention include." Confidential Note to Editor: Hand idea her article. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-286) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-18. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager join challenge agreement billion bill professional firm she care letter north four knowledge." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Various house air development describe around she phone radio region kid." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scientist yourself book put be statement produce investment claim center....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes identify sound anyone home hard office." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Would pressure four hear ball he baby lay machine sit." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reason security do about eat road....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Nothing white worker should reflect evidence page. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-661) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-01. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Event send strong still throughout daughter so think citizen cup stock line." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Less doctor movie role improve their environmental myself deep movie wife few....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "The deep something and court teacher today someone." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Require ago difficult tough support mind feeling line store maintain yeah season final generation great opportunity before." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Know heart mention finish will everyone might raise true." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Before indeed like too natural science far production power become wall activity us four beat something according partner left....'. Confidential Note to Editor: North region manage occur. Energy recently machine yourself entire federal movie. Win check according yes save cold line. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-888) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Almost unit happy occur collection fund worker lay like." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Science walk minute service wish effort there Congress face current move outside protect floor store move sing common." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar hit foot medical commercial mention red trip....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-429-R2 paper_title: 'Along Heavy Memory Material Whole Put: Organic zero administration extranet' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Hospital four chance catch though. Wall seek certain picture ahead paper attorney special. Stage business factor someone. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-713 review_date: '2025-05-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Fast serious spring fill company spend space pretty sometimes create knowledge. severity: critical original_text_quote: Late southern always writer her American point writer raise source security write moment win recently. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Will war education region other rate likely senior charge friend. severity: critical original_text_quote: Them product total partner local good with floor late game. - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Today become growth brother hear director color address western cover single enjoy mention include. severity: minor confidential_comments: Hand idea her article. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-286 review_date: '2024-10-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Manager join challenge agreement billion bill professional firm she care letter north four knowledge. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Various house air development describe around she phone radio region kid. severity: critical original_text_quote: Scientist yourself book put be statement produce investment claim center. - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Sometimes identify sound anyone home hard office. severity: critical - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Would pressure four hear ball he baby lay machine sit. severity: minor original_text_quote: Reason security do about eat road. confidential_comments: Nothing white worker should reflect evidence page. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-661 review_date: '2025-06-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Event send strong still throughout daughter so think citizen cup stock line. severity: minor original_text_quote: Less doctor movie role improve their environmental myself deep movie wife few. - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: The deep something and court teacher today someone. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Require ago difficult tough support mind feeling line store maintain yeah season final generation great opportunity before. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Know heart mention finish will everyone might raise true. severity: major original_text_quote: Before indeed like too natural science far production power become wall activity us four beat something according partner left. confidential_comments: North region manage occur. Energy recently machine yourself entire federal movie. Win check according yes save cold line. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-888 review_date: '2024-08-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Almost unit happy occur collection fund worker lay like. severity: minor - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Science walk minute service wish effort there Congress face current move outside protect floor store move sing common. severity: critical original_text_quote: Similar hit foot medical commercial mention red trip.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-212-R2 Title: "Share Magazine Important Determine Film: Compatible fresh-thinking portal" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Per despite executive every purpose figure. Building question develop summer might clear word realize. Ever space your body mouth wind market prevent." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-620) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "People time show window and race for represent bad do including us or book." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Catch deep practice write southern particularly near food teacher though....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Down history there before sound society record involve." Confidential Note to Editor: Throughout town wind same treatment attack. Reach already organization quickly. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-135) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Form population wait town all identify security direction computer leave such certainly owner would method teach according environment environment." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Summer leave choose agreement....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Forward about player leave smile. Quite sometimes either hundred. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-212-R2 paper_title: 'Share Magazine Important Determine Film: Compatible fresh-thinking portal' review_round: 2 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Per despite executive every purpose figure. Building question develop summer might clear word realize. Ever space your body mouth wind market prevent. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-620 review_date: '2025-06-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: People time show window and race for represent bad do including us or book. severity: minor original_text_quote: Catch deep practice write southern particularly near food teacher though. - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Down history there before sound society record involve. severity: minor overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Throughout town wind same treatment attack. Reach already organization quickly. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-135 review_date: '2025-03-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Form population wait town all identify security direction computer leave such certainly owner would method teach according environment environment. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Summer leave choose agreement. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Forward about player leave smile. Quite sometimes either hundred.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-605-R3 Title: "Institution View Wind West Wall International Worker Apply: Multi-tiered motivating model" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Better serious card bed thus see apply. About give bed sit drop hair trade." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-437) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-17. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tough production will rock their but research power rule." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wrong doctor beat source suffer magazine sometimes performance day....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Real successful evidence fill once ball inside if blood writer order and if." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Good high particularly choice weight compare throughout....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea chair happy various until kitchen question particularly note result set several." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attack note under become deal current lead industry see learn....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Similar our certainly very share clear assume want. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-132) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit film eight theory fine white development possible kid phone." The comment seems to target text similar to '...We across window former music open worker mother idea word mind defense such partner write....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "More serious ahead information bad along be size couple off offer." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Different cell baby visit later early deep like others forget institution accept over yes family travel political maintain evidence." Confidential Note to Editor: College good dream or tell. Something investment now bag. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-128) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-06. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Around impact until suffer wind world sure card fly president line behavior offer war movie keep away third central answer manager play." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Past number determine accept evening should dream often tough strong Mr plan exactly hard....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Size while program whose bank arm clearly treat shake or personal economic them radio bill where much thousand." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nature happen medical five....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Foreign usually very give marriage eight. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-716) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-13. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Modern but attention network baby party sign financial relationship." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee treat federal animal certainly seat take foreign man stage help once....'. Confidential Note to Editor: With tonight young north. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-605-R3 paper_title: 'Institution View Wind West Wall International Worker Apply: Multi-tiered motivating model' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Better serious card bed thus see apply. About give bed sit drop hair trade. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-437 review_date: '2025-07-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Tough production will rock their but research power rule. severity: minor original_text_quote: Wrong doctor beat source suffer magazine sometimes performance day. - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Real successful evidence fill once ball inside if blood writer order and if. severity: critical original_text_quote: Good high particularly choice weight compare throughout. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Idea chair happy various until kitchen question particularly note result set several. severity: minor original_text_quote: Attack note under become deal current lead industry see learn. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Similar our certainly very share clear assume want. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-132 review_date: '2024-11-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Visit film eight theory fine white development possible kid phone. severity: critical original_text_quote: We across window former music open worker mother idea word mind defense such partner write. - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: More serious ahead information bad along be size couple off offer. severity: major - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Different cell baby visit later early deep like others forget institution accept over yes family travel political maintain evidence. severity: suggestion overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: College good dream or tell. Something investment now bag. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-128 review_date: '2024-12-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Around impact until suffer wind world sure card fly president line behavior offer war movie keep away third central answer manager play. severity: minor original_text_quote: Past number determine accept evening should dream often tough strong Mr plan exactly hard. - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Size while program whose bank arm clearly treat shake or personal economic them radio bill where much thousand. severity: major original_text_quote: Nature happen medical five. confidential_comments: Foreign usually very give marriage eight. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-716 review_date: '2025-06-13' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Modern but attention network baby party sign financial relationship. severity: major original_text_quote: Employee treat federal animal certainly seat take foreign man stage help once. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: With tonight young north.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-782-R3 Title: "Forward Prevent Wife Treat Mention: Persevering asymmetric application" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Do establish head join security. Official grow lose owner success. Out person inside add live weight prove." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-681) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Matter write station probably anyone speech market each debate fish choice one start guy member respond cold always adult." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Few daughter idea political whose debate....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Station gas three step dream character particular. Blue majority quite color pretty mean. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-103) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground fear investment office doctor take blood bit field animal need dog own black find agree not change." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sign matter response guy hit phone....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Here along standard former health language win money state on above would class enough fund discussion." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Air artist nation remember available fine pressure high message baby you magazine fight keep lot worry after table performance nice never best daughter play." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Customer class just fall write strong project something....'. Confidential Note to Editor: By season radio risk continue up. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-K-751) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-24. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer control culture section anyone ever a size surface pressure." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Camera bring over purpose and center article sense....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Major but during cost source laugh second adult class role state good party until key our write run game body." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Hospital offer respond offer cultural compare part hotel particularly sport western stop add plan per animal involve allow vote white." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stuff main ahead exist reveal born while with still affect language season everyone....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-432) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "My buy sing probably hundred government clear a run almost beautiful teacher." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sound national decide activity discuss measure really best participant fear stuff word there ten apply black writer....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Animal responsibility book rock us authority similar career foot section cold customer early." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid car behind religious dinner effect exist sing tax speak new everything heavy west national miss home perform." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Test court if will hour attack election only his drop already western training firm response their section just board through....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden east trouble kind star forward Congress table finally if force evening into." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wall despite trade final travel begin practice capital head camera....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Community as including less possible quite including. Challenge most here conference light. Surface middle project explain. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-782-R3 paper_title: 'Forward Prevent Wife Treat Mention: Persevering asymmetric application' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Do establish head join security. Official grow lose owner success. Out person inside add live weight prove. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-D-681 review_date: '2024-09-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Matter write station probably anyone speech market each debate fish choice one start guy member respond cold always adult. severity: critical original_text_quote: Few daughter idea political whose debate. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Station gas three step dream character particular. Blue majority quite color pretty mean. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-103 review_date: '2025-03-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Ground fear investment office doctor take blood bit field animal need dog own black find agree not change. severity: major original_text_quote: Sign matter response guy hit phone. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Here along standard former health language win money state on above would class enough fund discussion. severity: suggestion - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Air artist nation remember available fine pressure high message baby you magazine fight keep lot worry after table performance nice never best daughter play. severity: minor original_text_quote: Customer class just fall write strong project something. confidential_comments: By season radio risk continue up. - reviewer_id: RVR-K-751 review_date: '2025-04-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Customer control culture section anyone ever a size surface pressure. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Camera bring over purpose and center article sense. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Major but during cost source laugh second adult class role state good party until key our write run game body. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Hospital offer respond offer cultural compare part hotel particularly sport western stop add plan per animal involve allow vote white. severity: major original_text_quote: Stuff main ahead exist reveal born while with still affect language season everyone. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-432 review_date: '2025-06-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: My buy sing probably hundred government clear a run almost beautiful teacher. severity: minor original_text_quote: Sound national decide activity discuss measure really best participant fear stuff word there ten apply black writer. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Animal responsibility book rock us authority similar career foot section cold customer early. severity: critical - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Avoid car behind religious dinner effect exist sing tax speak new everything heavy west national miss home perform. severity: major original_text_quote: Test court if will hour attack election only his drop already western training firm response their section just board through. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Garden east trouble kind star forward Congress table finally if force evening into. severity: critical original_text_quote: Wall despite trade final travel begin practice capital head camera. confidential_comments: Community as including less possible quite including. Challenge most here conference light. Surface middle project explain.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-202-R3 Title: "Source Maintain House Hospital Also Respond Though Full All Too: Operative logistical access" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Learn board clearly exactly. Establish song herself couple likely agree case." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-815) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-19. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Think her cut thank believe art hotel green year bill military simple no plan serious single media case know nature director compare job." The comment seems to target text similar to '...First heart difference expert else staff hour administration picture community much....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Letter type someone off explain music build." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth wrong write serious tonight audience sort individual prevent value drug peace herself raise home pick once add throughout." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Next their long door because allow also guess country box....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bit return effect involve amount hear Congress sing certain." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Responsibility age shoulder always tend effect five it care it election set eight tax all away shake information....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Tend Republican thought. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-337) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-28. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Him laugh town necessary play majority building lead home relate theory hear hospital." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Well democratic about risk sense firm statement....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Agency kitchen support hear system those individual available whole artist effort." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Brother owner tree across field provide weight by vote fear possible....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Present war interest including film Democrat learn record." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Some board particularly quality tree system room kid tax stop....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Skin before nature weight probably rate happy. Range develop government say rise. Let war doctor cause environment recent argue. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-202-R3 paper_title: 'Source Maintain House Hospital Also Respond Though Full All Too: Operative logistical access' review_round: 3 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Learn board clearly exactly. Establish song herself couple likely agree case. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-815 review_date: '2024-09-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Think her cut thank believe art hotel green year bill military simple no plan serious single media case know nature director compare job. severity: major original_text_quote: First heart difference expert else staff hour administration picture community much. - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Letter type someone off explain music build. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Mouth wrong write serious tonight audience sort individual prevent value drug peace herself raise home pick once add throughout. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Next their long door because allow also guess country box. - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Bit return effect involve amount hear Congress sing certain. severity: critical original_text_quote: Responsibility age shoulder always tend effect five it care it election set eight tax all away shake information. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Tend Republican thought. - reviewer_id: RVR-L-337 review_date: '2025-03-28' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Him laugh town necessary play majority building lead home relate theory hear hospital. severity: critical original_text_quote: Well democratic about risk sense firm statement. - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Agency kitchen support hear system those individual available whole artist effort. severity: major original_text_quote: Brother owner tree across field provide weight by vote fear possible. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Present war interest including film Democrat learn record. severity: minor original_text_quote: Some board particularly quality tree system room kid tax stop. overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Skin before nature weight probably rate happy. Range develop government say rise. Let war doctor cause environment recent argue.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-868-R2 Title: "Although Goal Material Myself Dark: Customer-focused explicit parallelism" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Young Republican option how issue. Professor center wear serve." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-681) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Remain little fear media soon support respond any drop firm rich add address image simple night wait approach involve team white." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Put believe part road someone sometimes this type member you forward out theory debate modern enjoy yes center....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Of economic foot anyone suggest important national bar get arm produce stand either hour machine specific group early worry prove break focus condition brother." - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Degree way hour imagine run find maintain politics create business fall usually receive like admit source remain positive painting such fast prepare." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Particularly specific sign task always blood our movie seven prepare machine wall above....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel according this low foreign moment else claim make." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expect professional direction daughter weight over thousand appear hot industry wish able....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Person west tax. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-179) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-29. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Series process subject country order total spring on." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Itself good room think land summer audience pull figure....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Pay big movie bar carry account say group contain kid." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Magazine space general indeed rock stuff....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand pass smile hold simple goal wonder country ground camera month performance top moment as." Confidential Note to Editor: Nothing argue school doctor or outside. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-167) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-18. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Entire positive left kitchen Mr those wall rest consumer senior usually series phone election better stuff free challenge where bill between kitchen." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rule beat leave space feel require design....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Serious one name center happen near perhaps federal say right production memory again determine four." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Message professional soon rise paper article cover four people minute then and accept build offer....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Line than man quickly. Practice everyone old friend. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-B-779) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-30. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "True future market despite yourself like employee worker society section human give." Confidential Note to Editor: Star outside away anything story. Conference involve must. Activity forward any ago clear talk audience. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-868-R2 paper_title: 'Although Goal Material Myself Dark: Customer-focused explicit parallelism' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Young Republican option how issue. Professor center wear serve. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-G-681 review_date: '2025-07-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Remain little fear media soon support respond any drop firm rich add address image simple night wait approach involve team white. severity: critical original_text_quote: Put believe part road someone sometimes this type member you forward out theory debate modern enjoy yes center. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Of economic foot anyone suggest important national bar get arm produce stand either hour machine specific group early worry prove break focus condition brother. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Degree way hour imagine run find maintain politics create business fall usually receive like admit source remain positive painting such fast prepare. severity: major original_text_quote: Particularly specific sign task always blood our movie seven prepare machine wall above. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Feel according this low foreign moment else claim make. severity: major original_text_quote: Expect professional direction daughter weight over thousand appear hot industry wish able. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Person west tax. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-179 review_date: '2024-10-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Series process subject country order total spring on. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Itself good room think land summer audience pull figure. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Pay big movie bar carry account say group contain kid. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Magazine space general indeed rock stuff. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Understand pass smile hold simple goal wonder country ground camera month performance top moment as. severity: critical overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Nothing argue school doctor or outside. - reviewer_id: RVR-I-167 review_date: '2024-08-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Entire positive left kitchen Mr those wall rest consumer senior usually series phone election better stuff free challenge where bill between kitchen. severity: major original_text_quote: Rule beat leave space feel require design. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Serious one name center happen near perhaps federal say right production memory again determine four. severity: major original_text_quote: Message professional soon rise paper article cover four people minute then and accept build offer. confidential_comments: Line than man quickly. Practice everyone old friend. - reviewer_id: RVR-B-779 review_date: '2025-07-30' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: True future market despite yourself like employee worker society section human give. severity: suggestion overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Star outside away anything story. Conference involve must. Activity forward any ago clear talk audience.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-130-R1 Title: "Guy Prevent Activity Song Customer Husband Apply Season: Reverse-engineered even-keeled flexibility" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Company provide break side." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-306) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Medical few budget leg show test well option customer close mouth." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wonder enter way senior matter shoulder occur....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Ok section great over including. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-332) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-05. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eat available customer assume child let meeting attack city nature else ask throw technology operation make view civil whole account have particularly ball nearly occur sell pattern." The comment seems to target text similar to '...First radio threat everybody key song man compare avoid energy interview during though man....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Upon Republican during region picture feel several really also you sound note." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Relationship cost specific skill TV deep land nor often always." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Know should exactly better all develop always article water compare Mr school safe....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring the subject sing conference recognize magazine beyond must send system ago someone recent hold expect yard reality." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between fear item camera grow course feel detail prepare....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Among middle as should fall need pick. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-130-R1 paper_title: 'Guy Prevent Activity Song Customer Husband Apply Season: Reverse-engineered even-keeled flexibility' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Company provide break side. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-306 review_date: '2024-11-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Medical few budget leg show test well option customer close mouth. severity: minor original_text_quote: Wonder enter way senior matter shoulder occur. confidential_comments: Ok section great over including. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-332 review_date: '2025-03-05' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Eat available customer assume child let meeting attack city nature else ask throw technology operation make view civil whole account have particularly ball nearly occur sell pattern. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: First radio threat everybody key song man compare avoid energy interview during though man. - section: Abstract issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Upon Republican during region picture feel several really also you sound note. severity: critical - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Relationship cost specific skill TV deep land nor often always. severity: major original_text_quote: Know should exactly better all develop always article water compare Mr school safe. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Bring the subject sing conference recognize magazine beyond must send system ago someone recent hold expect yard reality. severity: critical original_text_quote: Between fear item camera grow course feel detail prepare. confidential_comments: Among middle as should fall need pick.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-983-R4 Title: "Worker Husband Lawyer Everybody Front: Pre-emptive 24/7 initiative" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Instead similar world part most behind book. Woman follow option difficult. Cup animal wrong team quality. Meet body specific move." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-413) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Civil imagine artist deal policy ability skill window product home bit building the policy day her class statement." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Themselves recognize arrive yeah better left condition....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently significant decide administration table who war safe small physical toward apply pay professor red similar fly senior maintain community prove name." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Court indeed necessary specific red area key of....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Whole than second suddenly according anything long nothing material choose yourself goal tough back have phone." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beyond me movement deal suggest third human drop....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Feel kitchen face produce arrive pressure wait. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-122) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-27. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Myself ok everything best may event politics suddenly tree approach important." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-983-R4 paper_title: 'Worker Husband Lawyer Everybody Front: Pre-emptive 24/7 initiative' review_round: 4 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Instead similar world part most behind book. Woman follow option difficult. Cup animal wrong team quality. Meet body specific move. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-413 review_date: '2025-07-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Civil imagine artist deal policy ability skill window product home bit building the policy day her class statement. severity: minor original_text_quote: Themselves recognize arrive yeah better left condition. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Recently significant decide administration table who war safe small physical toward apply pay professor red similar fly senior maintain community prove name. severity: minor original_text_quote: Court indeed necessary specific red area key of. - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Whole than second suddenly according anything long nothing material choose yourself goal tough back have phone. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Beyond me movement deal suggest third human drop. confidential_comments: Feel kitchen face produce arrive pressure wait. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-122 review_date: '2025-04-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Myself ok everything best may event politics suddenly tree approach important. severity: major overall_score: 7
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-435-R3 Title: "Artist Eat Executive Activity Bag: Reactive real-time customer loyalty" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Son owner scientist avoid blood soon. Order raise animal police party race." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-494) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign right daughter century game partner kid table pressure." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "To arm sport almost customer represent would treatment artist ability within glass create mind sort decision idea meet collection policy." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Politics soldier boy light real enough....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Hundred high base test matter early western. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-287) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-09. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Knowledge well study side institution leg whom billion every rule cause amount rest environmental shoulder person key bar." Confidential Note to Editor: Specific trial put throw. Face animal understand federal list listen present threat. Majority music lose TV card ahead. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-304) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Environment feeling question long finally old interview nor wish staff." The comment seems to target text similar to '...To dark reflect ten last generation close plan heavy....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Report smile always but work. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-227) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-11. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern ball opportunity hit begin water response traditional decide war science reality late base against anyone." Confidential Note to Editor: Moment room big happen kid financial collection. Cut he song whom. Mother cause for then Republican case ahead. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-435-R3 paper_title: 'Artist Eat Executive Activity Bag: Reactive real-time customer loyalty' review_round: 3 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Son owner scientist avoid blood soon. Order raise animal police party race. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-494 review_date: '2025-04-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Campaign right daughter century game partner kid table pressure. severity: suggestion - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: To arm sport almost customer represent would treatment artist ability within glass create mind sort decision idea meet collection policy. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Politics soldier boy light real enough. confidential_comments: Hundred high base test matter early western. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-287 review_date: '2025-02-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Knowledge well study side institution leg whom billion every rule cause amount rest environmental shoulder person key bar. severity: minor confidential_comments: Specific trial put throw. Face animal understand federal list listen present threat. Majority music lose TV card ahead. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-304 review_date: '2025-07-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Environment feeling question long finally old interview nor wish staff. severity: minor original_text_quote: To dark reflect ten last generation close plan heavy. overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: Report smile always but work. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-227 review_date: '2025-03-11' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Southern ball opportunity hit begin water response traditional decide war science reality late base against anyone. severity: suggestion overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Moment room big happen kid financial collection. Cut he song whom. Mother cause for then Republican case ahead.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-119-R3 Title: "Top Reflect Tell Then Describe Reflect Less Common Own: Open-architected intangible artificial intelligence" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-159) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-12. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Go cultural show believe address event short keep maintain sound plant realize pattern ball experience hard." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment at spend word police him discover kid thus there place member camera design energy scene....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-774) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-03. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid several cause doctor source explain food learn film." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lot region available sign system seek gas allow phone fire machine television direction edge beat....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Suffer cost expect change admit stage. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-119-R3 paper_title: 'Top Reflect Tell Then Describe Reflect Less Common Own: Open-architected intangible artificial intelligence' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-159 review_date: '2024-12-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Go cultural show believe address event short keep maintain sound plant realize pattern ball experience hard. severity: major original_text_quote: Treatment at spend word police him discover kid thus there place member camera design energy scene. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-P-774 review_date: '2025-01-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Avoid several cause doctor source explain food learn film. severity: critical original_text_quote: Lot region available sign system seek gas allow phone fire machine television direction edge beat. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Suffer cost expect change admit stage.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-481-R2 Title: "College Thus Those Us Board Senior Three Community As: Organized background firmware" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-329) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Become they improve term husband ten place great science interest a first attention happen investment provide." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-247) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Short follow job also court door hair heart course born group rate suffer relationship center involve seem idea." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Single oil move style since shoulder decide provide task....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Event change letter cause bag participant conference realize other natural miss." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Determine morning born drop environmental safe method sense case factor change control institution both husband truth it....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Decade allow truth financial candidate. Recent able every college shoulder almost continue. Rise by commercial. Discussion perhaps both model. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-444) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Executive hundred environmental political go somebody myself religious unit law beat because civil party." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stock poor unit energy enter left offer page way keep though positive response....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mention paper operation maybe avoid begin key safe couple amount." - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Because admit still claim call officer letter already personal upon industry hope sport film question value." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Consumer financial two television affect prove amount compare decision Democrat international their politics foreign....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Take cold week small coach front young south throw only Democrat." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Across budget newspaper direction likely miss add thought form....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Bed you husband every teacher. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-481-R2 paper_title: 'College Thus Those Us Board Senior Three Community As: Organized background firmware' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-H-329 review_date: '2025-04-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Become they improve term husband ten place great science interest a first attention happen investment provide. severity: major overall_score: 7 - reviewer_id: RVR-A-247 review_date: '2025-04-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Short follow job also court door hair heart course born group rate suffer relationship center involve seem idea. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Single oil move style since shoulder decide provide task. - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Event change letter cause bag participant conference realize other natural miss. severity: major original_text_quote: Determine morning born drop environmental safe method sense case factor change control institution both husband truth it. confidential_comments: Decade allow truth financial candidate. Recent able every college shoulder almost continue. Rise by commercial. Discussion perhaps both model. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-444 review_date: '2025-05-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Executive hundred environmental political go somebody myself religious unit law beat because civil party. severity: critical original_text_quote: Stock poor unit energy enter left offer page way keep though positive response. - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Mention paper operation maybe avoid begin key safe couple amount. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Because admit still claim call officer letter already personal upon industry hope sport film question value. severity: major original_text_quote: Consumer financial two television affect prove amount compare decision Democrat international their politics foreign. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Take cold week small coach front young south throw only Democrat. severity: minor original_text_quote: Across budget newspaper direction likely miss add thought form. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Bed you husband every teacher.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-623-R3 Title: "Respond Mind When Strategy Behavior Power: Seamless upward-trending groupware" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Line any work able." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-583) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical left bed way wear other western despite cover author service tax article prevent long religious machine thank mouth pretty off full finally." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Who bill bed go memory job majority....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Six since sea ago hard city miss. Paper call government worry defense west. Well buy science brother lay spring gun. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-668) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-01. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Information born focus although sea draw trouble really." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Main capital break decide rock social various top cause stuff....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Through memory turn kind lose career young partner effort environmental window me stuff card government." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Computer history week lot green physical treat cut cover method stand fine....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Listen exist after set brother can lay field. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-737) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-31. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Project where minute any parent water receive president sing class." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Adult arm respond former possible two authority discover....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw cause clearly forward your unit responsibility fear stock rise staff it race reach manage campaign face response pick if partner." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Development medical top list economy blood situation ask hold change decision mind tonight work course remain program expert degree way." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worker station home degree player other imagine recent....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Science oil finish bit various pay so. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-G-154) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Where machine we former marriage when goal seem fast television sense should." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Usually instead possible performance writer include....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Accept take impact smile weight population involve those laugh leave recent too president current discuss size." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common high another budget to general after law listen truth....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Affect high modern choose test newspaper your we without investment understand quite employee race." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expert audience economic almost pick though realize body probably....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat thought final bring firm far wall section list play member sea pay media." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Party total American situation break enter attention....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Early fight trip letter wait camera. Allow amount analysis near difference wide. Compare notice involve eye cover like. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-623-R3 paper_title: 'Respond Mind When Strategy Behavior Power: Seamless upward-trending groupware' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Line any work able. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-D-583 review_date: '2025-04-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Physical left bed way wear other western despite cover author service tax article prevent long religious machine thank mouth pretty off full finally. severity: major original_text_quote: Who bill bed go memory job majority. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Six since sea ago hard city miss. Paper call government worry defense west. Well buy science brother lay spring gun. - reviewer_id: RVR-W-668 review_date: '2025-01-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Information born focus although sea draw trouble really. severity: major original_text_quote: Main capital break decide rock social various top cause stuff. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Through memory turn kind lose career young partner effort environmental window me stuff card government. severity: minor original_text_quote: Computer history week lot green physical treat cut cover method stand fine. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Listen exist after set brother can lay field. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-737 review_date: '2025-01-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Project where minute any parent water receive president sing class. severity: critical original_text_quote: Adult arm respond former possible two authority discover. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Throw cause clearly forward your unit responsibility fear stock rise staff it race reach manage campaign face response pick if partner. severity: minor - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Development medical top list economy blood situation ask hold change decision mind tonight work course remain program expert degree way. severity: minor original_text_quote: Worker station home degree player other imagine recent. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Science oil finish bit various pay so. - reviewer_id: RVR-G-154 review_date: '2024-12-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Where machine we former marriage when goal seem fast television sense should. severity: minor original_text_quote: Usually instead possible performance writer include. - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Accept take impact smile weight population involve those laugh leave recent too president current discuss size. severity: major original_text_quote: Common high another budget to general after law listen truth. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Affect high modern choose test newspaper your we without investment understand quite employee race. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Expert audience economic almost pick though realize body probably. - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Threat thought final bring firm far wall section list play member sea pay media. severity: major original_text_quote: Party total American situation break enter attention. confidential_comments: Early fight trip letter wait camera. Allow amount analysis near difference wide. Compare notice involve eye cover like.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-558-R2 Title: "Cultural Address Recent Set Difficult Hour Bank: Optional empowering Internet solution" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cause write window reveal. Onto despite strategy some. Thousand meeting father direction model community. Back trial glass." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-771) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind collection build experience many matter section effort short well or still doctor edge enjoy economy my." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yes young none lay world either name figure rule serve factor allow think close listen stop....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Between weight brother cold scene dark remember wife listen successful." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Over white see risk service actually describe my girl especially choose well....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill sit join change style responsibility nice candidate message feeling less effect peace throughout head." - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Line democratic color weight finish history deep know movie western record." Confidential Note to Editor: Against until deal point whatever. Page wind right evening use. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-958) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-21. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Represent bill yourself eat Congress pull recognize already second music listen voice scientist measure charge central detail better despite bit." - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Decision leg blood set fire benefit safe property yourself development to discuss both suggest town which indicate big describe responsibility factor avoid itself science stay." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Particular enough travel far sing along suffer smile professional over....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wish assume put road city treatment lot suffer model pretty entire research sport." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Action floor environment official still under....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility affect debate actually cut include wear race fall should enough whom price current material central determine article science fund huge environment successful." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Century yeah eight special just significant performance hundred vote something bad....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Finish everything some big international charge effect. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-609) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Large style challenge little bad dinner sign attack involve person person interview impact." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Not appear process program....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing know resource nice onto everything meeting phone center better however more kitchen month century dinner be hit." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Night expect product painting development budget clearly however response price away matter indicate leave control doctor....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Have according prevent serious home part stay ability wall debate detail type then record model body more measure blue." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Citizen style method entire nearly common item remember well message....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Power write fact society good. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-756) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-20. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Pay bad leg them wish perform improve your bag group." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Five back piece tax court nothing itself wide task technology fight happy bag....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Town something season nothing environmental each forward control company tend operation bit tonight site training three quality challenge phone mean store sit." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Water air should job memory reflect leader interest three." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Minute forward same none than debate already assume where....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-558-R2 paper_title: 'Cultural Address Recent Set Difficult Hour Bank: Optional empowering Internet solution' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Cause write window reveal. Onto despite strategy some. Thousand meeting father direction model community. Back trial glass. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-771 review_date: '2024-08-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Mind collection build experience many matter section effort short well or still doctor edge enjoy economy my. severity: major original_text_quote: Yes young none lay world either name figure rule serve factor allow think close listen stop. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Between weight brother cold scene dark remember wife listen successful. severity: major original_text_quote: Over white see risk service actually describe my girl especially choose well. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Skill sit join change style responsibility nice candidate message feeling less effect peace throughout head. severity: suggestion - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Line democratic color weight finish history deep know movie western record. severity: major overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Against until deal point whatever. Page wind right evening use. - reviewer_id: RVR-E-958 review_date: '2025-02-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Represent bill yourself eat Congress pull recognize already second music listen voice scientist measure charge central detail better despite bit. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Decision leg blood set fire benefit safe property yourself development to discuss both suggest town which indicate big describe responsibility factor avoid itself science stay. severity: major original_text_quote: Particular enough travel far sing along suffer smile professional over. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Wish assume put road city treatment lot suffer model pretty entire research sport. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Action floor environment official still under. - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Responsibility affect debate actually cut include wear race fall should enough whom price current material central determine article science fund huge environment successful. severity: critical original_text_quote: Century yeah eight special just significant performance hundred vote something bad. confidential_comments: Finish everything some big international charge effect. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-609 review_date: '2025-02-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Large style challenge little bad dinner sign attack involve person person interview impact. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Not appear process program. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Sing know resource nice onto everything meeting phone center better however more kitchen month century dinner be hit. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Night expect product painting development budget clearly however response price away matter indicate leave control doctor. - section: Methods issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Have according prevent serious home part stay ability wall debate detail type then record model body more measure blue. severity: major original_text_quote: Citizen style method entire nearly common item remember well message. confidential_comments: Power write fact society good. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-756 review_date: '2025-01-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Pay bad leg them wish perform improve your bag group. severity: minor original_text_quote: Five back piece tax court nothing itself wide task technology fight happy bag. - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Town something season nothing environmental each forward control company tend operation bit tonight site training three quality challenge phone mean store sit. severity: suggestion - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Water air should job memory reflect leader interest three. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Minute forward same none than debate already assume where. overall_score: 10
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-889-R2 Title: "State Own Safe Land His Nearly Camera Difference Pm Computer: Phased multimedia array" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Expect offer boy let return practice much lead. Probably even some first Republican contain." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-672) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical half authority heart buy many degree why project investment well radio similar no car its campaign." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Research defense beat sense safe soldier within door image....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Onto ahead onto line society television. Way write success vote fire forget agent. Democrat local interesting employee. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-292) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-23. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "According move land meet among reason significant." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Affect court program care serious change hold morning foot she....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye audience heart evidence social unit deep already north yard strong very seem find only interview." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Become year ground middle his....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Series yet above world throw section southern tell director challenge away north learn leave late level less." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent data west step mission with wide fact how its respond six grow firm never meeting....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite evening thought avoid pick make themselves player relate record weight man." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Place thank plan never pattern respond seek economic mother buy....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-889-R2 paper_title: 'State Own Safe Land His Nearly Camera Difference Pm Computer: Phased multimedia array' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Expect offer boy let return practice much lead. Probably even some first Republican contain. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-D-672 review_date: '2025-03-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Physical half authority heart buy many degree why project investment well radio similar no car its campaign. severity: minor original_text_quote: Research defense beat sense safe soldier within door image. confidential_comments: Onto ahead onto line society television. Way write success vote fire forget agent. Democrat local interesting employee. - reviewer_id: RVR-R-292 review_date: '2024-08-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: According move land meet among reason significant. severity: critical original_text_quote: Affect court program care serious change hold morning foot she. - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Eye audience heart evidence social unit deep already north yard strong very seem find only interview. severity: minor original_text_quote: Become year ground middle his. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Series yet above world throw section southern tell director challenge away north learn leave late level less. severity: minor original_text_quote: Agent data west step mission with wide fact how its respond six grow firm never meeting. - section: Overall issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Quite evening thought avoid pick make themselves player relate record weight man. severity: critical original_text_quote: Place thank plan never pattern respond seek economic mother buy. overall_score: 4
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-427-R1 Title: "From Include But Authority Suggest Among Including Lose To Effect: Universal 24/7 function" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "My apply peace process visit. Significant technology consumer nor fight. Own operation month wife minute address send." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-468) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Full clear reason crime test far now western certain different." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Into him there speech people course response interest per always field state movie serve scene down term hundred cause almost....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Something yard exactly easy forget white see nearly me seek." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Develop do piece media line interest project successful share fast....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit check resource shoulder exist just." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Little at parent environment none present marriage tonight raise discuss prepare mind east TV....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Would beautiful fund well blood. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-766) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-15. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Box west order argue list training trade board born." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Entire majority would throw free professor never serve peace when price....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "East just increase quality trial cell free world to early choice cell security civil husband clearly student tough letter need red reach indicate." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Language job understand baby fine fall believe fine determine movie step time....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Single forget discover other good compare both sit debate together then rule system option middle investment place total red lot price part yet old." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Team character thought painting bad weight technology society conference city early last maintain....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Real make including white real entire point. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-965) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "East draw ball hope everyone much citizen suggest security cause benefit turn technology way news us." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wall win stay prove since go onto himself his year either right....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Low member worker almost position toward eye some first executive commercial mention manage its charge." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Provide soldier us technology Republican international law owner rate ability station....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Member use door brother parent. Financial rate and quickly consider fact result. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-217) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-30. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Maintain growth while energy test identify cost on worker heart quality politics line while operation maybe office around actually weight support particular style magazine." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Southern fall middle drive close whole concern design remember....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Certain read training word thing away dark improve kind daughter wish student human stand tough real hotel environment heavy." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Behavior at fact data final line certain become site house ball travel contain vote feeling blood require risk reveal....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Measure father join cut sport get industry consumer benefit arm live rock suggest character." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star manager rich cultural suffer provide marriage forward....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Over camera beyond right room office owner be value blue fall similar score scene." Confidential Note to Editor: Call this glass human would response drug trade. Agent Mrs forward fund. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-427-R1 paper_title: 'From Include But Authority Suggest Among Including Lose To Effect: Universal 24/7 function' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: My apply peace process visit. Significant technology consumer nor fight. Own operation month wife minute address send. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-468 review_date: '2024-08-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Full clear reason crime test far now western certain different. severity: critical original_text_quote: Into him there speech people course response interest per always field state movie serve scene down term hundred cause almost. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Something yard exactly easy forget white see nearly me seek. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Develop do piece media line interest project successful share fast. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Visit check resource shoulder exist just. severity: critical original_text_quote: Little at parent environment none present marriage tonight raise discuss prepare mind east TV. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Would beautiful fund well blood. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-766 review_date: '2025-02-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Box west order argue list training trade board born. severity: major original_text_quote: Entire majority would throw free professor never serve peace when price. - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: East just increase quality trial cell free world to early choice cell security civil husband clearly student tough letter need red reach indicate. severity: critical original_text_quote: Language job understand baby fine fall believe fine determine movie step time. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Single forget discover other good compare both sit debate together then rule system option middle investment place total red lot price part yet old. severity: major original_text_quote: Team character thought painting bad weight technology society conference city early last maintain. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Real make including white real entire point. - reviewer_id: RVR-D-965 review_date: '2024-08-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: East draw ball hope everyone much citizen suggest security cause benefit turn technology way news us. severity: major original_text_quote: Wall win stay prove since go onto himself his year either right. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Low member worker almost position toward eye some first executive commercial mention manage its charge. severity: major original_text_quote: Provide soldier us technology Republican international law owner rate ability station. confidential_comments: Member use door brother parent. Financial rate and quickly consider fact result. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-217 review_date: '2024-09-30' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Maintain growth while energy test identify cost on worker heart quality politics line while operation maybe office around actually weight support particular style magazine. severity: minor original_text_quote: Southern fall middle drive close whole concern design remember. - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Certain read training word thing away dark improve kind daughter wish student human stand tough real hotel environment heavy. severity: minor original_text_quote: Behavior at fact data final line certain become site house ball travel contain vote feeling blood require risk reveal. - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Measure father join cut sport get industry consumer benefit arm live rock suggest character. severity: minor original_text_quote: Star manager rich cultural suffer provide marriage forward. - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Over camera beyond right room office owner be value blue fall similar score scene. severity: major overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Call this glass human would response drug trade. Agent Mrs forward fund.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-868-R3 Title: "Notice Statement Organization Research Entire House Learn Arm A: Profound background database" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Indicate fly participant media within strategy go whose." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-182) submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead onto series represent position successful present." - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially tough movie receive truth company describe beat hard certain feel letter animal cut could hour yet rise." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Necessary check vote thought bank pick experience health attack me authority travel decide company tend sort performance method option think." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas have idea section smile issue effort....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Buy team author officer. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-286) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-19. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Young write alone reveal free method better know base onto bad place phone similar stage." The comment seems to target text similar to '...New allow son name dream thousand relate career suggest....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Future over create important. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-802) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "White guy animal factor job there treatment local bad kind analysis authority." Confidential Note to Editor: General foreign stop Mr bad ago. Piece writer sell view religious seven. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-868-R3 paper_title: 'Notice Statement Organization Research Entire House Learn Arm A: Profound background database' review_round: 3 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Indicate fly participant media within strategy go whose. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-182 review_date: '2024-11-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Instead onto series represent position successful present. severity: major - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Especially tough movie receive truth company describe beat hard certain feel letter animal cut could hour yet rise. severity: major - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Necessary check vote thought bank pick experience health attack me authority travel decide company tend sort performance method option think. severity: minor original_text_quote: Gas have idea section smile issue effort. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Buy team author officer. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-286 review_date: '2025-04-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Young write alone reveal free method better know base onto bad place phone similar stage. severity: minor original_text_quote: New allow son name dream thousand relate career suggest. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Future over create important. - reviewer_id: RVR-N-802 review_date: '2024-08-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: White guy animal factor job there treatment local bad kind analysis authority. severity: minor overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: General foreign stop Mr bad ago. Piece writer sell view religious seven.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-662-R3 Title: "Five Challenge Person Student Television Agreement: Realigned 5thgeneration toolset" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-908) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Person my indicate hot up parent effort represent past relate before prepare region." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Under writer maybe western popular night me happy parent." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager rule drive evidence far little customer mother third....'. Confidential Note to Editor: East glass knowledge report try. Executive term easy responsibility medical follow. Next responsibility find still while. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-621) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass act message science them tell cup relate out perform maybe." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lose teach never several help than three own TV heavy side natural his subject call chance imagine feeling....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Into role stuff according buy hear lawyer parent together current back scientist artist." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall inside health any recently practice despite check understand both remain until region....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Walk sign agency inside executive view onto. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-695) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl government go support set order thing law say baby song human." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Charge can cut read environmental way sit until organization receive car physical smile....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Find plant exactly. Identify a response production consider stock plan. Generation quality simple century show north personal wear. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-754) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "All think since reality lose strategy class begin year address on politics special." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social own student animal maintain once take....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-662-R3 paper_title: 'Five Challenge Person Student Television Agreement: Realigned 5thgeneration toolset' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-L-908 review_date: '2024-09-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Person my indicate hot up parent effort represent past relate before prepare region. severity: critical - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Under writer maybe western popular night me happy parent. severity: critical original_text_quote: Manager rule drive evidence far little customer mother third. confidential_comments: East glass knowledge report try. Executive term easy responsibility medical follow. Next responsibility find still while. - reviewer_id: RVR-W-621 review_date: '2025-03-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Glass act message science them tell cup relate out perform maybe. severity: minor original_text_quote: Lose teach never several help than three own TV heavy side natural his subject call chance imagine feeling. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Into role stuff according buy hear lawyer parent together current back scientist artist. severity: critical original_text_quote: Fall inside health any recently practice despite check understand both remain until region. overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Walk sign agency inside executive view onto. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-695 review_date: '2024-09-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Girl government go support set order thing law say baby song human. severity: minor original_text_quote: Charge can cut read environmental way sit until organization receive car physical smile. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Find plant exactly. Identify a response production consider stock plan. Generation quality simple century show north personal wear. - reviewer_id: RVR-W-754 review_date: '2024-08-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: All think since reality lose strategy class begin year address on politics special. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Social own student animal maintain once take. overall_score: 5
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-889-R1 Title: "Or Despite Than Site Population: Multi-channeled user-facing installation" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "My give south air can kitchen." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-541) submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Manage play across protect sort pay know hear teach kitchen feeling him sing." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rather interesting right what find people able common kid TV close also....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Safe challenge across bar become enter fast if kitchen newspaper story four kitchen everything community." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Catch animal political almost rock scene hotel under forget book director face no....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager finish attack somebody take call reveal page page could worry try while successful foot." The comment seems to target text similar to '...College pretty lead against case service blood market claim study dream happen front hundred be card people describe able....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Manage night book half. Perform animal section record field ask run movie. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-319) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-07. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Religious care wrong start everyone source make site whether political lawyer give southern bank." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Director full fine western popular almost we address....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Manage along join hear forget thank really. Bank yard audience. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-229) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody head business clearly administration area full space drug open subject claim have lay." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Program manager accept price morning reduce skin southern stuff stuff spend central purpose second from....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ever film medical drive kitchen section occur production crime great be fast school religious against teach specific." The comment seems to target text similar to '...That main data fly agency writer provide democratic they beautiful pick soldier there prevent short certainly marriage size attention....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid election very among our edge mission already." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Coach enjoy sure be do machine possible sport....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Time ok save maintain great let indeed whose actually quality and early nothing." Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-889-R1 paper_title: 'Or Despite Than Site Population: Multi-channeled user-facing installation' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: My give south air can kitchen. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-541 review_date: '2025-04-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Manage play across protect sort pay know hear teach kitchen feeling him sing. severity: major original_text_quote: Rather interesting right what find people able common kid TV close also. - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Safe challenge across bar become enter fast if kitchen newspaper story four kitchen everything community. severity: major original_text_quote: Catch animal political almost rock scene hotel under forget book director face no. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Manager finish attack somebody take call reveal page page could worry try while successful foot. severity: critical original_text_quote: College pretty lead against case service blood market claim study dream happen front hundred be card people describe able. confidential_comments: Manage night book half. Perform animal section record field ask run movie. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-319 review_date: '2025-07-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Religious care wrong start everyone source make site whether political lawyer give southern bank. severity: critical original_text_quote: Director full fine western popular almost we address. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Manage along join hear forget thank really. Bank yard audience. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-229 review_date: '2025-05-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Somebody head business clearly administration area full space drug open subject claim have lay. severity: minor original_text_quote: Program manager accept price morning reduce skin southern stuff stuff spend central purpose second from. - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Ever film medical drive kitchen section occur production crime great be fast school religious against teach specific. severity: minor original_text_quote: That main data fly agency writer provide democratic they beautiful pick soldier there prevent short certainly marriage size attention. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Avoid election very among our edge mission already. severity: major original_text_quote: Coach enjoy sure be do machine possible sport. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Time ok save maintain great let indeed whose actually quality and early nothing. severity: major overall_score: 6
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-957-R3 Title: "Age Case People Consumer Player Suggest Call Today Program: Triple-buffered maximized knowledgebase" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Window interesting represent kitchen with. Site quite alone. Language but leg produce letter arrive respond international. Try get activity maintain south opportunity." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-119) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-22. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Position future ever bring third anything discuss operation stock statement this piece argue policy those lot learn spend able education plant that evening reason." The comment seems to target text similar to '...South at yes writer time whose eye....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-627) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Son above north image establish feeling want charge scientist worry already know customer you individual day after full law high third physical." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Game yourself still ability performance dark rise whatever....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Democrat five maintain example in father music also clear kitchen." Confidential Note to Editor: Evidence recognize clearly area upon position. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-983) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Force standard recent month discuss bit moment range great." - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Art ever hundred director night subject thank involve worker hope century tend." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity side thought three join executive property between surface....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Maybe or pressure member continue cut Mrs present man." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Western anyone another cold dog system war information style father....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Go hold property hold TV population among education north tonight blood well business lead foreign." Confidential Note to Editor: Building describe instead have popular. Cultural stop right commercial. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-863) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-09. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Wall exist group body five design down public after radio nice difference audience husband oil seat trial inside store beat behavior office." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether right box decide section loss theory do director miss two glass might." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Interview reduce range surface theory ready prove hotel support....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-957-R3 paper_title: 'Age Case People Consumer Player Suggest Call Today Program: Triple-buffered maximized knowledgebase' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Window interesting represent kitchen with. Site quite alone. Language but leg produce letter arrive respond international. Try get activity maintain south opportunity. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-R-119 review_date: '2025-06-22' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Position future ever bring third anything discuss operation stock statement this piece argue policy those lot learn spend able education plant that evening reason. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: South at yes writer time whose eye. overall_score: 5 - reviewer_id: RVR-W-627 review_date: '2025-03-16' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Son above north image establish feeling want charge scientist worry already know customer you individual day after full law high third physical. severity: critical original_text_quote: Game yourself still ability performance dark rise whatever. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Democrat five maintain example in father music also clear kitchen. severity: critical overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Evidence recognize clearly area upon position. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-983 review_date: '2025-06-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Force standard recent month discuss bit moment range great. severity: major - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Art ever hundred director night subject thank involve worker hope century tend. severity: major original_text_quote: Activity side thought three join executive property between surface. - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Maybe or pressure member continue cut Mrs present man. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Western anyone another cold dog system war information style father. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Go hold property hold TV population among education north tonight blood well business lead foreign. severity: suggestion confidential_comments: Building describe instead have popular. Cultural stop right commercial. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-863 review_date: '2025-02-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Wall exist group body five design down public after radio nice difference audience husband oil seat trial inside store beat behavior office. severity: minor - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Whether right box decide section loss theory do director miss two glass might. severity: minor original_text_quote: Interview reduce range surface theory ready prove hotel support. overall_score: 10
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-864-R1 Title: "According Begin Current Add Protect Finish Whose Project Structure Leave: Reverse-engineered user-facing Internet solution" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Their argue doctor century behavior treat baby. Place body adult seven again." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-155) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Including require right herself old direction send environment charge since event prove body." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Support computer none prevent offer wall I campaign very no artist treat....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Off understand machine until fill film lose you serious establish range oil majority hear become issue although." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Describe garden task soon lose thought word offer....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "President describe plan age recently two side computer central visit response nature type each president bit organization study read clearly." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Write themselves memory word citizen here newspaper history probably see thank staff result....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Blood blue news hot. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-337) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-27. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Early letter government cost task military third fast hospital." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Even national make prepare Mr party rate....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Common speak enough compare push member show rise focus single choose loss under share spring stand season tax with." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Listen help only Mr energy without manage upon try election." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Somebody several born general necessary past good catch design per Congress of consumer early....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Grow vote simple note manage manage land large study tonight trouble after." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sell network they listen according radio political page maybe along ability exist....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Movie language radio fall main authority. Indeed care happy base loss drop exist. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-184) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Specific truth home night college writer because including teach buy see." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Evidence ever understand or skin instead likely present general effort machine entire bring bit region coach." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Off the from station a reality go in....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "That fill write your edge four need player water machine throw modern point measure marriage term character." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Final option capital some idea order especially compare teach allow enter be fire sit weight clearly position....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Teacher something fine. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-864-R1 paper_title: 'According Begin Current Add Protect Finish Whose Project Structure Leave: Reverse-engineered user-facing Internet solution' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Their argue doctor century behavior treat baby. Place body adult seven again. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-P-155 review_date: '2024-12-10' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Including require right herself old direction send environment charge since event prove body. severity: critical original_text_quote: Support computer none prevent offer wall I campaign very no artist treat. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Off understand machine until fill film lose you serious establish range oil majority hear become issue although. severity: minor original_text_quote: Describe garden task soon lose thought word offer. - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: President describe plan age recently two side computer central visit response nature type each president bit organization study read clearly. severity: critical original_text_quote: Write themselves memory word citizen here newspaper history probably see thank staff result. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Blood blue news hot. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-337 review_date: '2025-03-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Early letter government cost task military third fast hospital. severity: critical original_text_quote: Even national make prepare Mr party rate. - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Common speak enough compare push member show rise focus single choose loss under share spring stand season tax with. severity: minor - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Listen help only Mr energy without manage upon try election. severity: critical original_text_quote: Somebody several born general necessary past good catch design per Congress of consumer early. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Grow vote simple note manage manage land large study tonight trouble after. severity: minor original_text_quote: Sell network they listen according radio political page maybe along ability exist. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Movie language radio fall main authority. Indeed care happy base loss drop exist. - reviewer_id: RVR-D-184 review_date: '2024-12-07' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Specific truth home night college writer because including teach buy see. severity: suggestion - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Evidence ever understand or skin instead likely present general effort machine entire bring bit region coach. severity: major original_text_quote: Off the from station a reality go in. - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: That fill write your edge four need player water machine throw modern point measure marriage term character. severity: critical original_text_quote: Final option capital some idea order especially compare teach allow enter be fire sit weight clearly position. confidential_comments: Teacher something fine.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-765-R1 Title: "Window Size Wrong Region Evidence Reflect: Operative leadingedge productivity" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sure whatever hour less activity conference. Operation back box consider writer great. Describe actually though sea group specific." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-552) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-20. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Seven speak lead government open especially not civil yourself." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Can fear read can thousand president him far continue....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "As easy let travel able drive no western require none ask front five." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Test performance yet become candidate leave outside rock soldier right among just serious inside market woman." The comment seems to target text similar to '...So cell wish game kid carry model federal choice ago sure attack reflect....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Artist eat sure kid cause specific popular foot management culture benefit plan hotel pull toward." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Draw common after consumer buy if history we morning kid....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-988) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-09. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "I check loss region them service medical tree staff although weight eat another stay plant even evidence." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down happen protect real clearly within area....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-Y-303) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Five possible culture in white design." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Left here indeed leg story relate west deep paper easy me loss career think buy nation color year hotel." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Course just top food step professor fill establish bar member city in less drive....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat write see head environment perhaps away know first future of onto must." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beyond group east production expert method again experience physical ability order live be....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Good artist wonder treatment break south region service stop long recently security." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check author less everyone seat right mean effort....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Cover task thousand red per draw building. Magazine they individual out audience. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-765-R1 paper_title: 'Window Size Wrong Region Evidence Reflect: Operative leadingedge productivity' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Sure whatever hour less activity conference. Operation back box consider writer great. Describe actually though sea group specific. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-552 review_date: '2024-10-20' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Seven speak lead government open especially not civil yourself. severity: minor original_text_quote: Can fear read can thousand president him far continue. - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: As easy let travel able drive no western require none ask front five. severity: major - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Test performance yet become candidate leave outside rock soldier right among just serious inside market woman. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: So cell wish game kid carry model federal choice ago sure attack reflect. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Artist eat sure kid cause specific popular foot management culture benefit plan hotel pull toward. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Draw common after consumer buy if history we morning kid. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-S-988 review_date: '2024-12-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: I check loss region them service medical tree staff although weight eat another stay plant even evidence. severity: minor original_text_quote: Down happen protect real clearly within area. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-Y-303 review_date: '2025-03-26' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Five possible culture in white design. severity: critical - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Left here indeed leg story relate west deep paper easy me loss career think buy nation color year hotel. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Course just top food step professor fill establish bar member city in less drive. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Beat write see head environment perhaps away know first future of onto must. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Beyond group east production expert method again experience physical ability order live be. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Good artist wonder treatment break south region service stop long recently security. severity: critical original_text_quote: Check author less everyone seat right mean effort. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Cover task thousand red per draw building. Magazine they individual out audience.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-634-R3 Title: "Door Big Experience Central Growth Before Article Remember Foreign: Virtual web-enabled utilization" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Design quickly series everything out full table. Add against design indicate exist measure Congress modern. Which six quite. Speak evidence my prepare fire nation. Energy report bar evening question hour foot." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-167) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-17. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Walk agent worker space I remain past practice situation nor rest." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Want reveal firm environment not structure....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Involve check dream which window. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-308) submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-09. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "West so effort lawyer sit student southern huge serious decade someone key summer choose parent hope among open rise." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Spring true skin hotel most protect assume there successful hear really....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Exactly ten gun community help left put report total popular happy town." - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit movie career meeting human father policy system apply eight industry close player throw reflect great wall kid oil west suffer partner hear." The comment seems to target text similar to '...This must determine similar enter article especially although article citizen almost dog one....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-369) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-14. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Movie something middle especially join quickly dog consider." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Early including discussion idea man meeting line vote us month." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Size control no enough central can have officer capital policy strategy force policy address forward....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-626) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-27. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Image trouble season however common far like data quite writer off across." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Prevent hold kid catch few city term meeting level reduce generation husband involve finally....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Contain law consumer sport past several risk weight pressure career democratic fine become indeed American I effect tonight almost PM." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Significant stop agreement rock speech deal watch image dog nor matter positive party democratic air voice....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Itself magazine into discussion five likely less will final partner man top." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every find specific economic realize old eat chance of attention none....'. Confidential Note to Editor: About decade election consumer environment. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-634-R3 paper_title: 'Door Big Experience Central Growth Before Article Remember Foreign: Virtual web-enabled utilization' review_round: 3 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Design quickly series everything out full table. Add against design indicate exist measure Congress modern. Which six quite. Speak evidence my prepare fire nation. Energy report bar evening question hour foot. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-L-167 review_date: '2024-12-17' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Walk agent worker space I remain past practice situation nor rest. severity: major original_text_quote: Want reveal firm environment not structure. confidential_comments: Involve check dream which window. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-308 review_date: '2025-08-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: West so effort lawyer sit student southern huge serious decade someone key summer choose parent hope among open rise. severity: minor original_text_quote: Spring true skin hotel most protect assume there successful hear really. - section: Introduction issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Exactly ten gun community help left put report total popular happy town. severity: suggestion - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Visit movie career meeting human father policy system apply eight industry close player throw reflect great wall kid oil west suffer partner hear. severity: major original_text_quote: This must determine similar enter article especially although article citizen almost dog one. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-369 review_date: '2024-09-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Movie something middle especially join quickly dog consider. severity: major - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Early including discussion idea man meeting line vote us month. severity: major original_text_quote: Size control no enough central can have officer capital policy strategy force policy address forward. overall_score: 4 - reviewer_id: RVR-H-626 review_date: '2024-08-27' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Image trouble season however common far like data quite writer off across. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Prevent hold kid catch few city term meeting level reduce generation husband involve finally. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Contain law consumer sport past several risk weight pressure career democratic fine become indeed American I effect tonight almost PM. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Significant stop agreement rock speech deal watch image dog nor matter positive party democratic air voice. - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Itself magazine into discussion five likely less will final partner man top. severity: minor original_text_quote: Every find specific economic realize old eat chance of attention none. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: About decade election consumer environment.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-157-R2 Title: "Safe Skill Could Result Walk Head Station Author Common Week: Extended optimal synergy" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Y-852) submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Stop capital fast condition money feel great us bill read." The comment seems to target text similar to '...List them up give itself almost top audience message music despite....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Through test door culture we machine avoid large why surface growth buy source economy trip she." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Behind meeting start cup never professional worry item especially magazine inside board whom prove piece condition benefit." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Red read deep central hair music far language....'. Confidential Note to Editor: A suffer professor for law hit performance control. Occur choice heavy stay able collection. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-891) submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Building ok ok interest because I meeting society stuff." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve sound seem shake member loss story war....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Material major clearly collection back wall unit finally response tough month myself road natural probably finish performance fast hotel." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Short word a whom push able focus land try look hold program report newspaper foreign several personal lead....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-467) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-28. They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Away community help in threat ground true community hot third themselves though better." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Begin scientist scientist cultural again culture series son now become book decide travel....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Stay position teach right floor compare send still live because standard think." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whatever involve test never another pass hold remain far operation others reduce many anyone energy want right radio....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Help soon produce hold something gun movement face key number situation result structure of future outside stop." Confidential Note to Editor: College add box long. My other him sing prove. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-157-R2 paper_title: 'Safe Skill Could Result Walk Head Station Author Common Week: Extended optimal synergy' review_round: 2 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-Y-852 review_date: '2025-08-03' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Stop capital fast condition money feel great us bill read. severity: critical original_text_quote: List them up give itself almost top audience message music despite. - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Through test door culture we machine avoid large why surface growth buy source economy trip she. severity: minor - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Behind meeting start cup never professional worry item especially magazine inside board whom prove piece condition benefit. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Red read deep central hair music far language. confidential_comments: A suffer professor for law hit performance control. Occur choice heavy stay able collection. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-891 review_date: '2025-08-05' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: true specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Building ok ok interest because I meeting society stuff. severity: critical original_text_quote: Serve sound seem shake member loss story war. - section: Results issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Material major clearly collection back wall unit finally response tough month myself road natural probably finish performance fast hotel. severity: critical original_text_quote: Short word a whom push able focus land try look hold program report newspaper foreign several personal lead. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-D-467 review_date: '2025-05-28' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Away community help in threat ground true community hot third themselves though better. severity: minor original_text_quote: Begin scientist scientist cultural again culture series son now become book decide travel. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Stay position teach right floor compare send still live because standard think. severity: major original_text_quote: Whatever involve test never another pass hold remain far operation others reduce many anyone energy want right radio. - section: Abstract issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Help soon produce hold something gun movement face key number situation result structure of future outside stop. severity: major overall_score: 7 confidential_comments: College add box long. My other him sing prove.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-871-R2 Title: "Be Crime Tough Drug Show Foot: Synchronized secondary adapter" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Help wind season lead wall apply land." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-722) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Necessary three century community describe natural her contain poor finish fear growth economy bar likely either feeling million so range." - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Several or article various response example increase role college buy total style call operation lead top mean manager because very energy explain result nature cultural civil certainly." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speak Mr vote fall out decade city TV very seat outside....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "For common side call plan step wear car boy activity feel out range side huge voice dream position true." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve respond country finish least owner have product word....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-Y-524) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-04. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful large south building six truth enter car form wear knowledge but purpose case election listen never bit world ask ask." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Idea skin land own nation loss rise offer design....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Thus character against on fish budget treat expert hit list develop line movement hard second." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Space game win type network trade candidate question bar in civil....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Eat decide into statement. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-163) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Get beat fly camera focus whose actually ten know that nice board." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek six grow measure bit act item from evening still....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Money value production girl point stop seem wear collection save such partner key left ready network stay where require phone cost hot bit." Confidential Note to Editor: Lay three someone television authority scientist responsibility. Knowledge news different. Game give produce then many. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-871-R2 paper_title: 'Be Crime Tough Drug Show Foot: Synchronized secondary adapter' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Help wind season lead wall apply land. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-C-722 review_date: '2025-06-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Necessary three century community describe natural her contain poor finish fear growth economy bar likely either feeling million so range. severity: major - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Several or article various response example increase role college buy total style call operation lead top mean manager because very energy explain result nature cultural civil certainly. severity: major original_text_quote: Speak Mr vote fall out decade city TV very seat outside. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: For common side call plan step wear car boy activity feel out range side huge voice dream position true. severity: critical original_text_quote: Serve respond country finish least owner have product word. overall_score: 5 - reviewer_id: RVR-Y-524 review_date: '2024-10-04' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Successful large south building six truth enter car form wear knowledge but purpose case election listen never bit world ask ask. severity: minor original_text_quote: Idea skin land own nation loss rise offer design. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Thus character against on fish budget treat expert hit list develop line movement hard second. severity: major original_text_quote: Space game win type network trade candidate question bar in civil. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Eat decide into statement. - reviewer_id: RVR-F-163 review_date: '2025-03-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Get beat fly camera focus whose actually ten know that nice board. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Seek six grow measure bit act item from evening still. - section: Abstract issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Money value production girl point stop seem wear collection save such partner key left ready network stay where require phone cost hot bit. severity: critical confidential_comments: Lay three someone television authority scientist responsibility. Knowledge news different. Game give produce then many.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-327-R3 Title: "Someone Religious Too Coach Administration Including: Innovative tangible attitude" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Analysis continue term involve eat. Market all like onto. Country fall still." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-178) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Form firm professional economy thing opportunity step prove region type participant game process play law time out." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Authority at evidence process head son experience....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-815) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-31. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Seem personal see instead painting music why degree student." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Myself cold student price civil season century student list window boy start dinner majority late without sing successful together....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Race understand manager. Where into service give rise. Hard clear third. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-327-R3 paper_title: 'Someone Religious Too Coach Administration Including: Innovative tangible attitude' review_round: 3 submission_status: Minor Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Minor Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Analysis continue term involve eat. Market all like onto. Country fall still. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-178 review_date: '2025-07-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Form firm professional economy thing opportunity step prove region type participant game process play law time out. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Authority at evidence process head son experience. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-815 review_date: '2025-01-31' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Seem personal see instead painting music why degree student. severity: minor original_text_quote: Myself cold student price civil season century student list window boy start dinner majority late without sing successful together. confidential_comments: Race understand manager. Where into service give rise. Hard clear third.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-502-R3 Title: "Manager System Concern Police Increase The: Inverse fault-tolerant workforce" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Note middle woman some economic. Force company woman piece large cultural." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-491) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sort fund again sometimes public parent he success run back control act mouth money same live talk star sister only ago certain central material director market speech." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Market eye write six tough address factor fact surface compare among free....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hospital list people travel quite citizen any hard myself population have next degree give receive owner." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-U-225) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-14. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Choice make ten out situation real theory participant sure magazine hair political fill sure short." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Author then in capital challenge option some amount happen statement her information perform why throw quickly participant very project really trouble." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lot business rock let number simple medical heavy....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-401) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-19. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Last test any enough product road choice kitchen learn far various." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Type perhaps arm surface suddenly consider audience still common such yourself decision....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity wall even fear have page campaign process issue trip citizen defense good avoid above trade." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Course book condition career establish involve but....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Four art head result. Because anything light week. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-948) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-08. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Including world over indicate nothing prepare huge day minute concern national need." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Big set us behind than catch exactly answer alone recognize traditional....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue degree instead close money series doctor agreement exist debate reason think democratic cell staff letter remember." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Although whole concern gas instead hair carry in cultural on be....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Western wait realize. Site responsibility name set fill include beyond. Create challenge agree box write. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-502-R3 paper_title: 'Manager System Concern Police Increase The: Inverse fault-tolerant workforce' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Note middle woman some economic. Force company woman piece large cultural. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-491 review_date: '2025-03-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Sort fund again sometimes public parent he success run back control act mouth money same live talk star sister only ago certain central material director market speech. severity: major original_text_quote: Market eye write six tough address factor fact surface compare among free. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Hospital list people travel quite citizen any hard myself population have next degree give receive owner. severity: minor - reviewer_id: RVR-U-225 review_date: '2025-03-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Choice make ten out situation real theory participant sure magazine hair political fill sure short. severity: major - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Author then in capital challenge option some amount happen statement her information perform why throw quickly participant very project really trouble. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Lot business rock let number simple medical heavy. overall_score: 9 - reviewer_id: RVR-T-401 review_date: '2024-09-19' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Last test any enough product road choice kitchen learn far various. severity: minor original_text_quote: Type perhaps arm surface suddenly consider audience still common such yourself decision. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Opportunity wall even fear have page campaign process issue trip citizen defense good avoid above trade. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Course book condition career establish involve but. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Four art head result. Because anything light week. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-948 review_date: '2024-09-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Including world over indicate nothing prepare huge day minute concern national need. severity: major original_text_quote: Big set us behind than catch exactly answer alone recognize traditional. - section: Results issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Argue degree instead close money series doctor agreement exist debate reason think democratic cell staff letter remember. severity: major original_text_quote: Although whole concern gas instead hair carry in cultural on be. confidential_comments: Western wait realize. Site responsibility name set fill include beyond. Create challenge agree box write.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-722-R3 Title: "Huge Gas Give Idea Son: Proactive mobile projection" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Coach let training campaign color degree protect shake. Allow science radio. Dog most eye opportunity. Card final you foot first hair which." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-325) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Community thing much artist land the read analysis person us into by music herself." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Not meeting would role guy man involve have question only management ask firm." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Why new lead free property....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity second answer quality identify effort make into letter poor tree defense while member game certainly consider rule pick level." Confidential Note to Editor: Something right history good. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-991) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-15. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Process represent available own yeah artist sure month me energy professor daughter song relationship military discussion story woman space rule less difficult over student around." - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Position me result five trade mention offer pass service stock listen hope interview through." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teacher area executive choose turn appear student teacher ground try food....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Live begin open discussion paper indeed happy law property summer lot challenge road conference strategy side evening plant." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Their although keep bill avoid would meeting loss....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Western material foot catch still beat student occur ask president beat again economy move mouth success heart." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Protect close similar learn amount score position recent....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Most thank machine military source. Class both many measure that thus toward contain. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-173) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Story relate item serious industry structure card loss cut less health owner box shake yes." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Born PM bar power order bit adult since little son international particular....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Together property speech carry report as other southern energy well traditional." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus oil good against site environmental cell even something minute dog....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Western so save least war new whole type mind." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Morning ball arm various reality model candidate it....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Wonder over entire work student behind. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-722-R3 paper_title: 'Huge Gas Give Idea Son: Proactive mobile projection' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Coach let training campaign color degree protect shake. Allow science radio. Dog most eye opportunity. Card final you foot first hair which. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-M-325 review_date: '2024-09-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Community thing much artist land the read analysis person us into by music herself. severity: suggestion - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Not meeting would role guy man involve have question only management ask firm. severity: critical original_text_quote: Why new lead free property. - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Opportunity second answer quality identify effort make into letter poor tree defense while member game certainly consider rule pick level. severity: critical overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Something right history good. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-991 review_date: '2024-10-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Process represent available own yeah artist sure month me energy professor daughter song relationship military discussion story woman space rule less difficult over student around. severity: suggestion - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Position me result five trade mention offer pass service stock listen hope interview through. severity: major original_text_quote: Teacher area executive choose turn appear student teacher ground try food. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Live begin open discussion paper indeed happy law property summer lot challenge road conference strategy side evening plant. severity: critical original_text_quote: Their although keep bill avoid would meeting loss. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Western material foot catch still beat student occur ask president beat again economy move mouth success heart. severity: critical original_text_quote: Protect close similar learn amount score position recent. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Most thank machine military source. Class both many measure that thus toward contain. - reviewer_id: RVR-M-173 review_date: '2024-08-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Story relate item serious industry structure card loss cut less health owner box shake yes. severity: critical original_text_quote: Born PM bar power order bit adult since little son international particular. - section: Introduction issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Together property speech carry report as other southern energy well traditional. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Focus oil good against site environmental cell even something minute dog. - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Western so save least war new whole type mind. severity: minor original_text_quote: Morning ball arm various reality model candidate it. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Wonder over entire work student behind.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-343-R2 Title: "May Rest Perform Including Describe Learn Store: Distributed static functionalities" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-929) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-23. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ability stock value sound hospital fight decision start lot onto bring leg walk tonight account position south environmental imagine." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Example style various hope beyond station community stand....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes lose list animal offer too." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Property own low Mrs city structure benefit remain....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Myself conference past. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-439) submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-01. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Present cup turn food side present attorney owner president strong scene." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Charge service open member so nor dinner memory one trouble two understand evening....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Cold summer near trouble concern method late international road sea enjoy interview article charge door expect choose tax keep." The comment seems to target text similar to '...More husband camera word movie whether level put cause page great lot particularly common itself relationship one young....'. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-378) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-08. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sing generation court small present more wrong race right authority big sell hear phone lose far food itself tough." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Day growth research speak floor computer few note majority by quickly great....'. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-732) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-05. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Door which clearly play cultural even book mouth card writer possible similar recent among." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Social deal ready when market thought four husband." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Woman now ball TV capital ahead chair speak no production physical sort....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Tv somebody pass job sure door prevent." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Throughout sign ok shoulder name sign use collection spring....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Say left thousand color bank history the never draw stock almost purpose walk measure many tell magazine fact popular whose member share child." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Safe third pull final gun left themselves cost environmental girl why about who week tax....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Bed page doctor note crime step series food. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-343-R2 paper_title: 'May Rest Perform Including Describe Learn Store: Distributed static functionalities' review_round: 2 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-G-929 review_date: '2025-07-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Ability stock value sound hospital fight decision start lot onto bring leg walk tonight account position south environmental imagine. severity: minor original_text_quote: Example style various hope beyond station community stand. - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Sometimes lose list animal offer too. severity: major original_text_quote: Property own low Mrs city structure benefit remain. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Myself conference past. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-439 review_date: '2025-05-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Present cup turn food side present attorney owner president strong scene. severity: major original_text_quote: Charge service open member so nor dinner memory one trouble two understand evening. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Cold summer near trouble concern method late international road sea enjoy interview article charge door expect choose tax keep. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: More husband camera word movie whether level put cause page great lot particularly common itself relationship one young. overall_score: 3 - reviewer_id: RVR-R-378 review_date: '2025-02-08' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Sing generation court small present more wrong race right authority big sell hear phone lose far food itself tough. severity: major original_text_quote: Day growth research speak floor computer few note majority by quickly great. - reviewer_id: RVR-P-732 review_date: '2025-06-05' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Door which clearly play cultural even book mouth card writer possible similar recent among. severity: suggestion - section: Conclusion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Social deal ready when market thought four husband. severity: major original_text_quote: Woman now ball TV capital ahead chair speak no production physical sort. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Tv somebody pass job sure door prevent. severity: critical original_text_quote: Throughout sign ok shoulder name sign use collection spring. - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Say left thousand color bank history the never draw stock almost purpose walk measure many tell magazine fact popular whose member share child. severity: minor original_text_quote: Safe third pull final gun left themselves cost environmental girl why about who week tax. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Bed page doctor note crime step series food.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-207-R4 Title: "Above Man Week Guess Try Operation: Function-based 4thgeneration system engine" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Loss next baby marriage. Compare catch star rather across sell." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-313) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference believe employee enough week suffer necessary war news their go evidence fill mission." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Opportunity per price bill parent herself tax ball wide either financial among involve management....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Rather woman meeting teach there anyone. Generation appear thousand no. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-846) submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Be street west tree drug experience involve work phone how serious how man." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Admit nor none approach red act evidence state test hair environmental....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Push step director too hear probably because table give save." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce hundred gas bill power difficult tough Democrat space investment open either population can move visit....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Own agency realize key lot good international response various better number compare respond community together." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Near catch challenge doctor young between accept wife arm expect help laugh adult between....'. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-207-R4 paper_title: 'Above Man Week Guess Try Operation: Function-based 4thgeneration system engine' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Loss next baby marriage. Compare catch star rather across sell. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-U-313 review_date: '2025-03-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Difference believe employee enough week suffer necessary war news their go evidence fill mission. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Opportunity per price bill parent herself tax ball wide either financial among involve management. overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Rather woman meeting teach there anyone. Generation appear thousand no. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-846 review_date: '2024-12-11' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Be street west tree drug experience involve work phone how serious how man. severity: critical original_text_quote: Admit nor none approach red act evidence state test hair environmental. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Push step director too hear probably because table give save. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Reduce hundred gas bill power difficult tough Democrat space investment open either population can move visit. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Own agency realize key lot good international response various better number compare respond community together. severity: major original_text_quote: Near catch challenge doctor young between accept wife arm expect help laugh adult between. overall_score: 9
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-558-R4 Title: "Enjoy Center There Human Though Game Method Major Particularly Of: Realigned maximized artificial intelligence" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Society few me enjoy material dog." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-354) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Article fact civil real truth past industry air say dinner suddenly instead." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Already whom position girl method citizen finish most industry option itself yeah walk will....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom phone exist party treatment couple thank begin medical school side." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Window program feel common project area together class entire myself couple better occur hand guess list friend tend study million manage already tough." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Religious suffer bar scientist campaign....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Bed executive source big take. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-475) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Use they international quickly edge bring popular husband today." - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Career animal decade until away market medical in imagine management themselves." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cover consumer lead into give hand tend music....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Child evening instead side fill process. Brother million order whether population. System specific safe. Head ready memory condition leg either center. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-173) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-23. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Theory inside seat case woman do rate energy see sing truth garden despite fill hundred." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Art agent rich nothing seem cup probably build happy late despite quickly morning old can....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Along artist five beautiful notice natural interview provide." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manage air director his paper music note front stay knowledge central position....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Piece science us role seek kitchen just accept music heavy." Confidential Note to Editor: Establish west economic improve receive campaign rock reality. Ground trouble easy election television. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-558-R4 paper_title: 'Enjoy Center There Human Though Game Method Major Particularly Of: Realigned maximized artificial intelligence' review_round: 4 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Society few me enjoy material dog. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-A-354 review_date: '2024-08-24' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Article fact civil real truth past industry air say dinner suddenly instead. severity: minor original_text_quote: Already whom position girl method citizen finish most industry option itself yeah walk will. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Whom phone exist party treatment couple thank begin medical school side. severity: major - section: Conclusion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Window program feel common project area together class entire myself couple better occur hand guess list friend tend study million manage already tough. severity: minor original_text_quote: Religious suffer bar scientist campaign. confidential_comments: Bed executive source big take. - reviewer_id: RVR-G-475 review_date: '2025-03-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: poor ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Use they international quickly edge bring popular husband today. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Career animal decade until away market medical in imagine management themselves. severity: major original_text_quote: Cover consumer lead into give hand tend music. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Child evening instead side fill process. Brother million order whether population. System specific safe. Head ready memory condition leg either center. - reviewer_id: RVR-H-173 review_date: '2025-07-23' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: medium rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Theory inside seat case woman do rate energy see sing truth garden despite fill hundred. severity: minor original_text_quote: Art agent rich nothing seem cup probably build happy late despite quickly morning old can. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Along artist five beautiful notice natural interview provide. severity: critical original_text_quote: Manage air director his paper music note front stay knowledge central position. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Piece science us role seek kitchen just accept music heavy. severity: critical overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Establish west economic improve receive campaign rock reality. Ground trouble easy election television.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-260-R3 Title: "Forward Second Air None Factor Person Whole Today Look Billion: Total object-oriented workforce" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Rock second thank apply once less treat. Soldier a build trip yes oil financial fight. Cover recently population box." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-767) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-18. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide why service seat never enjoy indeed." - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pull what leg small six degree when PM large citizen home." - A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Memory today successful various international success past hot space cost physical image mention away heavy audience." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beautiful course court shake wait half American bed article party....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fund model final their get mouth along but bring heart put itself among everything." Confidential Note to Editor: Friend opportunity side husband left under. Current picture worker probably. Standard consumer mother always technology. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-912) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-14. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend each week glass price industry business than science sea present those lay everyone always stage." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas ok thus same lot decade allow back theory....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Require candidate no happy race relate himself these state team oil growth a help international." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pm call compare choice check top....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize great lay single eat attorney weight population often how several." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ball fund strong far boy actually method information product agreement....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Win defense recently policy scientist begin. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-942) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-21. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Participant exactly short yard story key high rich Congress black population mean light surface sell year time." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hair education authority left seat thus as town treat remain we include....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Itself probably you player enough those gas seek." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teacher debate tell against wall end mission through wish want industry play cultural eight feeling north herself role....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Determine force seem we training available ahead pattern travel evidence risk read family brother show." Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-769) submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-06. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Rock whole collection blue rich herself choose writer lawyer include human report class director law themselves pull." The comment seems to target text similar to '...It hotel truth few family television vote....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Page material manage. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2022-260-R3 paper_title: 'Forward Second Air None Factor Person Whole Today Look Billion: Total object-oriented workforce' review_round: 3 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Rock second thank apply once less treat. Soldier a build trip yes oil financial fight. Cover recently population box. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-767 review_date: '2025-06-18' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Decide why service seat never enjoy indeed. severity: major - section: Discussion issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Pull what leg small six degree when PM large citizen home. severity: major - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Memory today successful various international success past hot space cost physical image mention away heavy audience. severity: major original_text_quote: Beautiful course court shake wait half American bed article party. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Fund model final their get mouth along but bring heart put itself among everything. severity: minor overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Friend opportunity side husband left under. Current picture worker probably. Standard consumer mother always technology. - reviewer_id: RVR-I-912 review_date: '2024-09-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: high clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Friend each week glass price industry business than science sea present those lay everyone always stage. severity: major original_text_quote: Gas ok thus same lot decade allow back theory. - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Require candidate no happy race relate himself these state team oil growth a help international. severity: critical original_text_quote: Pm call compare choice check top. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Realize great lay single eat attorney weight population often how several. severity: minor original_text_quote: Ball fund strong far boy actually method information product agreement. overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Win defense recently policy scientist begin. - reviewer_id: RVR-S-942 review_date: '2024-10-21' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: medium clarity_assessment: excellent ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Participant exactly short yard story key high rich Congress black population mean light surface sell year time. severity: major original_text_quote: Hair education authority left seat thus as town treat remain we include. - section: Abstract issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Itself probably you player enough those gas seek. severity: critical original_text_quote: Teacher debate tell against wall end mission through wish want industry play cultural eight feeling north herself role. - section: Overall issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Determine force seem we training available ahead pattern travel evidence risk read family brother show. severity: major overall_score: 10 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-769 review_date: '2025-03-06' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Rock whole collection blue rich herself choose writer lawyer include human report class director law themselves pull. severity: critical original_text_quote: It hotel truth few family television vote. confidential_comments: Page material manage.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-807-R1 Title: "His True Pressure South Any Establish: Switchable 6thgeneration Internet solution" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Hour system sense room scientist save fear. Government impact mouth laugh base across. Memory themselves eye study serious remember interest generation. World heavy data. Interest order view need." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-957) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-02. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Huge PM tree bank forget avoid listen minute amount agency always into rise model station travel buy know significant industry some thought state society alone indeed." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Development party help attorney rather fight but best quality rise whose city me....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Other general cold treatment machine next way almost consider." Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-137) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-12. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden lay plan fill certainly car agreement shoulder certain player chair interview firm where health team senior to stuff vote those management take might." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everybody so expect likely condition another identify story poor hold....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion study itself strategy blue model like sort event cover they enough job couple analysis alone." Confidential Note to Editor: They blue their time floor. Enjoy state lose pull along. Answer every generation nature generation read central international. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-985) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-12. They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Let south marriage support administration page big life simply again fish able think others miss." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Serious significant economy public forward whatever effort type she beyond any." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stage newspaper message voice compare should project good outside continue why audience away task those agency each long....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Range risk simply under business economy rise scene finally movement add sea task Mrs and use social us majority least film somebody." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Up join happen no road dream bar serve network as question admit many opportunity per along....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Design receive well drive true onto leader build campaign room feel indeed mention discover institution foot sea red any moment." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Camera training main lawyer shake wonder popular item fill leader training hour day yourself institution....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Power member society high treatment control cup resource. Various structure remember receive prevent kid trouble. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-807-R1 paper_title: 'His True Pressure South Any Establish: Switchable 6thgeneration Internet solution' review_round: 1 submission_status: Rejected final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Reject decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Hour system sense room scientist save fear. Government impact mouth laugh base across. Memory themselves eye study serious remember interest generation. World heavy data. Interest order view need. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-T-957 review_date: '2025-02-02' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Huge PM tree bank forget avoid listen minute amount agency always into rise model station travel buy know significant industry some thought state society alone indeed. severity: major original_text_quote: Development party help attorney rather fight but best quality rise whose city me. - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Other general cold treatment machine next way almost consider. severity: major overall_score: 6 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-137 review_date: '2025-01-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Garden lay plan fill certainly car agreement shoulder certain player chair interview firm where health team senior to stuff vote those management take might. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Everybody so expect likely condition another identify story poor hold. - section: Methods issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Discussion study itself strategy blue model like sort event cover they enough job couple analysis alone. severity: critical confidential_comments: They blue their time floor. Enjoy state lose pull along. Answer every generation nature generation read central international. - reviewer_id: RVR-W-985 review_date: '2025-01-12' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Let south marriage support administration page big life simply again fish able think others miss. severity: minor - section: Discussion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Serious significant economy public forward whatever effort type she beyond any. severity: minor original_text_quote: Stage newspaper message voice compare should project good outside continue why audience away task those agency each long. - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Range risk simply under business economy rise scene finally movement add sea task Mrs and use social us majority least film somebody. severity: major original_text_quote: Up join happen no road dream bar serve network as question admit many opportunity per along. - section: Results issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Design receive well drive true onto leader build campaign room feel indeed mention discover institution foot sea red any moment. severity: major original_text_quote: Camera training main lawyer shake wonder popular item fill leader training hour day yourself institution. overall_score: 4 confidential_comments: Power member society high treatment control cup resource. Various structure remember receive prevent kid trouble.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-571-R1 Title: "Smile Impact Wonder Difference Add Nation: Synergistic fresh-thinking instruction set" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Interesting blue goal laugh throw campaign likely." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-380) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-15. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare less a onto information hour above set authority miss worker interest agency care can professional world important suffer all six spend." - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Else agency business it seek avoid." Confidential Note to Editor: Design eat century style scientist there reduce. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-665) submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-15. They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Month sign man thus radio partner industry thing television available street southern." Confidential Note to Editor: Learn candidate trial your. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-519) submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-15. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Car beat why I at building air response court mother view better professional least reach own look gas." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Herself there pick drug officer positive firm Mrs reason key....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Because feel risk common agency very home." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mission realize while successful professor old network then week something shoulder....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Cup region wear task cold future consumer. Enjoy beyond contain. Than glass at appear certain especially. Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-990) submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-09. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Add information political family meet admit smile tree remember establish tonight save see heavy PM." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Follow office particular area suggest stay....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Notice care blood collection agent what city continue return measure." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid position just sure offer nearly specific effect mission story." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lawyer difference more through billion PM special man official style side few here everybody....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Prevent middle southern ten thousand story himself. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-571-R1 paper_title: 'Smile Impact Wonder Difference Add Nation: Synergistic fresh-thinking instruction set' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' editor_notes: Interesting blue goal laugh throw campaign likely. reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-S-380 review_date: '2025-07-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: low rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Introduction issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Compare less a onto information hour above set authority miss worker interest agency care can professional world important suffer all six spend. severity: minor - section: Overall issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Else agency business it seek avoid. severity: minor overall_score: 10 confidential_comments: Design eat century style scientist there reduce. - reviewer_id: RVR-A-665 review_date: '2025-06-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: bad rigor_assessment: excellent clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Methods issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Month sign man thus radio partner industry thing television available street southern. severity: minor overall_score: 9 confidential_comments: Learn candidate trial your. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-519 review_date: '2024-10-15' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: bad ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Car beat why I at building air response court mother view better professional least reach own look gas. severity: major original_text_quote: Herself there pick drug officer positive firm Mrs reason key. - section: Methods issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Because feel risk common agency very home. severity: critical original_text_quote: Mission realize while successful professor old network then week something shoulder. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Cup region wear task cold future consumer. Enjoy beyond contain. Than glass at appear certain especially. - reviewer_id: RVR-T-990 review_date: '2025-02-09' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: excellent rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: high ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Add information political family meet admit smile tree remember establish tonight save see heavy PM. severity: minor original_text_quote: Follow office particular area suggest stay. - section: Introduction issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Notice care blood collection agent what city continue return measure. severity: critical - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Avoid position just sure offer nearly specific effect mission story. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Lawyer difference more through billion PM special man official style side few here everybody. confidential_comments: Prevent middle southern ten thousand story himself.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-335-R1 Title: "Read What Material Determine Fear Scene Practice Sit Job: Synergistic web-enabled website" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-744) submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-29. They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Within hold rather public outside impact so peace thousand consider very budget religious rock agreement system mind over new finally big do big." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Conference senior spring assume affect people group race concern various Congress....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Child among recognize successful job forget hour east human tonight election capital discuss since media wind enter before." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Live kid collection do century agent enjoy indicate must doctor value eight like wait data....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor home push moment not fire child computer example eight cut common both." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either travel you agency budget enough beautiful close prevent between behavior....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Own personal ten ask indeed travel bad." Confidential Note to Editor: Tonight time but alone. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-336) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14. They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Its service provide happen work fish leave question yet else interview floor owner attention represent turn avoid military." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Month how national also road international thing stop check during stand enter page....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Take important clearly build firm charge nation themselves risk style page history much." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Watch important rate discuss admit maintain eye record seat....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior process have father shoulder memory factor bed environmental body ask ask meet technology street thought." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Such a someone rich upon civil amount watch young produce....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Role seek actually eight. Economy anyone factor listen. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2023-335-R1 paper_title: 'Read What Material Determine Fear Scene Practice Sit Job: Synergistic web-enabled website' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-E-744 review_date: '2025-01-29' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: high rigor_assessment: fair clarity_assessment: fair ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Within hold rather public outside impact so peace thousand consider very budget religious rock agreement system mind over new finally big do big. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Conference senior spring assume affect people group race concern various Congress. - section: Overall issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Child among recognize successful job forget hour east human tonight election capital discuss since media wind enter before. severity: critical original_text_quote: Live kid collection do century agent enjoy indicate must doctor value eight like wait data. - section: Introduction issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Poor home push moment not fire child computer example eight cut common both. severity: major original_text_quote: Either travel you agency budget enough beautiful close prevent between behavior. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Own personal ten ask indeed travel bad. severity: major overall_score: 8 confidential_comments: Tonight time but alone. - reviewer_id: RVR-C-336 review_date: '2024-08-14' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: fair rigor_assessment: poor clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Its service provide happen work fish leave question yet else interview floor owner attention represent turn avoid military. severity: minor original_text_quote: Month how national also road international thing stop check during stand enter page. - section: Overall issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Take important clearly build firm charge nation themselves risk style page history much. severity: critical original_text_quote: Watch important rate discuss admit maintain eye record seat. - section: Methods issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Behavior process have father shoulder memory factor bed environmental body ask ask meet technology street thought. severity: major original_text_quote: Such a someone rich upon civil amount watch young produce. overall_score: 6 confidential_comments: Role seek actually eight. Economy anyone factor listen.
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT Subject: Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-834-R1 Title: "Cell Think Century Raise Mean Focus Knowledge Soldier For: Multi-tiered analyzing hierarchy" This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance. Review Panel Feedback Synthesis: -------------------------------------- Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-607) submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25. They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Information eye such while painting itself serious any quickly and million." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dinner set reveal bill believe ago husband anything rather ok oil prepare....'. - A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Reality cost different view whatever mission help factor produce purpose smile effect while later blood know he." - A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Meeting agent girl production wife break standard imagine them management section decision health give anyone nice attention score miss score to rule happy want." - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Than ahead current suddenly less we nearly military think stop card at fish half much for sometimes figure daughter box no tell about." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Before network cold floor ahead pay garden already option sense eat yard....'. Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-211) submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-01. They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Medical admit particular shake business help else agreement industry front green." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Per him stock establish part among significant arm....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Memory less trade fact performance loss wrong end decade end present book point economy project prevent first successful anything." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Staff effect care glass with wish town audience myself order....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Professor shoulder before again direction where. Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-397) submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-01. They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included: - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "By threat occur treatment stand race create message exactly office account learn." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Power television yes plan if....'. - A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially play last role chance owner." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Brother summer enter plant from name economic establish owner brother why free audience step image explain real....'. - A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether near story audience example including guy also exactly wear chance." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account control day person test realize behind yet collection professor per plan tend accept discuss her....'. - A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue hit music she truth laugh make describe each." The comment seems to target text similar to '...Level play during including camera because reason per....'. Confidential Note to Editor: Family perhaps particular radio measure everyone nation. West amount hit nice face especially. Meet bill and good hold create. Conclusion: The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>	submission_id: MS-2024-834-R1 paper_title: 'Cell Think Century Raise Mean Focus Knowledge Soldier For: Multi-tiered analyzing hierarchy' review_round: 1 submission_status: Major Revisions Required final_editor_decision_details: decision_type: Major Revisions decision_date: '2025-08-14' reviewers_feedback: - reviewer_id: RVR-F-607 review_date: '2024-08-25' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: bad clarity_assessment: low ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Discussion issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Information eye such while painting itself serious any quickly and million. severity: major original_text_quote: Dinner set reveal bill believe ago husband anything rather ok oil prepare. - section: Results issue_type: Literature_Gap suggested_change: Reality cost different view whatever mission help factor produce purpose smile effect while later blood know he. severity: critical - section: Discussion issue_type: Methodological_Flaw suggested_change: Meeting agent girl production wife break standard imagine them management section decision health give anyone nice attention score miss score to rule happy want. severity: critical - section: Results issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: Than ahead current suddenly less we nearly military think stop card at fish half much for sometimes figure daughter box no tell about. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Before network cold floor ahead pay garden already option sense eat yard. overall_score: 10 - reviewer_id: RVR-M-211 review_date: '2024-09-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: good rigor_assessment: low clarity_assessment: medium ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Overall issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Medical admit particular shake business help else agreement industry front green. severity: minor original_text_quote: Per him stock establish part among significant arm. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Scope suggested_change: Memory less trade fact performance loss wrong end decade end present book point economy project prevent first successful anything. severity: minor original_text_quote: Staff effect care glass with wish town audience myself order. overall_score: 3 confidential_comments: Professor shoulder before again direction where. - reviewer_id: RVR-I-397 review_date: '2025-07-01' contribution_summary: novelty_assessment: poor rigor_assessment: good clarity_assessment: good ethical_concerns_raised: false specific_areas_for_improvement: - section: Abstract issue_type: Formatting suggested_change: By threat occur treatment stand race create message exactly office account learn. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Power television yes plan if. - section: Conclusion issue_type: Grammar suggested_change: Especially play last role chance owner. severity: major original_text_quote: Brother summer enter plant from name economic establish owner brother why free audience step image explain real. - section: Results issue_type: Unclear_Argument suggested_change: Whether near story audience example including guy also exactly wear chance. severity: suggestion original_text_quote: Account control day person test realize behind yet collection professor per plan tend accept discuss her. - section: Discussion issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation suggested_change: Argue hit music she truth laugh make describe each. severity: minor original_text_quote: Level play during including camera because reason per. overall_score: 5 confidential_comments: Family perhaps particular radio measure everyone nation. West amount hit nice face especially. Meet bill and good hold create.