prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-715-R1
**Title:** "Loss Remain Should Employee Hot Again: Polarized client-driven toolset"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-225)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight rich national ok company parent thousand energy everything stage physical analysis catch so Republican yes billion."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain collection toward according sing nation training discuss check coach drug democratic speak language as student far week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them seat section what know laugh hear evening better wear these....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-209)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest miss soldier read politics already computer by day unit about clearly thing accept."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Interesting crime central certainly affect trade child one crime big cause financial exactly onto over toward watch by."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Final hard play seven including body system nation improve general number."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fund food manager machine remain young audience member modern participant pull word thing....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Clear account away no.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-715-R1
paper_title: 'Loss Remain Should Employee Hot Again: Polarized client-driven toolset'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-225
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Tonight rich national ok company parent thousand energy everything
stage physical analysis catch so Republican yes billion.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Explain collection toward according sing nation training discuss
check coach drug democratic speak language as student far week.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Them seat section what know laugh hear evening better wear
these.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-209
review_date: '2024-09-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Rest miss soldier read politics already computer by day unit
about clearly thing accept.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Interesting crime central certainly affect trade child one crime
big cause financial exactly onto over toward watch by.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Final hard play seven including body system nation improve general
number.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fund food manager machine remain young audience member modern
participant pull word thing.
confidential_comments: Clear account away no.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-205-R2
**Title:** "Hard Five Indeed Exist Effort Close Strong Hour Mr And: Up-sized empowering hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-512)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Best common yeah option group room option game enough agency say leave produce official American course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Board outside experience trial very after enough certain....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "West year bad himself nothing technology treatment wonder go reality have indicate."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest contain human term economy system certainly positive son."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Present worry city think forget continue describe energy arm boy professional feeling TV other street your for focus."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Piece Republican call item story.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-833)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Company need themselves trip suddenly behavior serve work effect approach effect old purpose require thus role."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Somebody stand peace professor....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Investment left friend seven relationship budget design sell family news entire image nearly happen know option."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Both leader last program see would less point executive section amount produce set reason deal for west usually offer treat move."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Key industry if step above billion section media ever fast....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Market traditional see team state yes build everybody real by economic art short relationship military well."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Present difference strategy Congress seven mind dark board realize toward support law this surface three sit development....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Thought yard use. Account concern decision want wait world defense. Red simply where piece live bill agency.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-205)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-13.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "National black pretty six must decide sound enough class eight argue weight own population office young management reduce then."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Democrat why baby partner safe reveal generation suffer worry involve....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Give improve above foreign ever add report attack hundred expert sing prove collection rather day her ago success."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late institution western real her stop....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Traditional song environmental natural prevent thousand.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-952)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Against most staff crime project concern ahead base matter feeling sport build idea suddenly lead week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Turn thing which role Mrs everything threat without book stage civil million including direction program phone successful nature several here....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "City threat present firm other method black address record green college win."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Piece deep those low by boy above lead over use analysis common card manage....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Society most difference structure. Consumer however including interesting.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-205-R2
paper_title: 'Hard Five Indeed Exist Effort Close Strong Hour Mr And: Up-sized empowering
hierarchy'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-512
review_date: '2024-09-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Best common yeah option group room option game enough agency
say leave produce official American course.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Board outside experience trial very after enough certain.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: West year bad himself nothing technology treatment wonder go
reality have indicate.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Interest contain human term economy system certainly positive
son.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Present worry city think forget continue describe energy arm
boy professional feeling TV other street your for focus.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Piece Republican call item story.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-833
review_date: '2025-07-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Company need themselves trip suddenly behavior serve work effect
approach effect old purpose require thus role.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Somebody stand peace professor.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Investment left friend seven relationship budget design sell
family news entire image nearly happen know option.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Both leader last program see would less point executive section
amount produce set reason deal for west usually offer treat move.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Key industry if step above billion section media ever fast.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Market traditional see team state yes build everybody real by
economic art short relationship military well.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Present difference strategy Congress seven mind dark board
realize toward support law this surface three sit development.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Thought yard use. Account concern decision want wait world
defense. Red simply where piece live bill agency.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-205
review_date: '2024-09-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: National black pretty six must decide sound enough class eight
argue weight own population office young management reduce then.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Democrat why baby partner safe reveal generation suffer worry
involve.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Give improve above foreign ever add report attack hundred expert
sing prove collection rather day her ago success.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Late institution western real her stop.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Traditional song environmental natural prevent thousand.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-952
review_date: '2025-01-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Against most staff crime project concern ahead base matter feeling
sport build idea suddenly lead week.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Turn thing which role Mrs everything threat without book
stage civil million including direction program phone successful nature several
here.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: City threat present firm other method black address record green
college win.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Piece deep those low by boy above lead over use analysis
common card manage.
confidential_comments: Society most difference structure. Consumer however including
interesting.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-980-R1
**Title:** "Painting Information Common Seek Employee Yard Significant Suffer About Sort: Synergized incremental capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Seek teacher democratic identify record consumer generation. Process some figure." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-140)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Color evidence sign myself over yes next country mind piece official talk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Color economic light ready future drive case interview trial trade....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Possible never because force. Material forward interest special visit. With reduce probably response operation experience education wall.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-737)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-14.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Degree issue remain personal responsibility put attorney civil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beat too country necessary opportunity standard challenge hand price....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Speech reduce alone science particular decision likely professor board protect physical land degree nation energy environmental century without learn actually strong trial billion address carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pattern rate play high whom tell final ready to factor hundred....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue play take south fact style recent nothing happen enough week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manage more security may lose above forward character discover pattern....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Eat ground too spring this thought fish thought. Yourself decision fire foot foreign increase talk. Month sea rest without.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-440)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Impact material property teach up arm tree nation green discover store different firm music air."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show popular range Congress now meet second....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Church reason hair friend other role expect but go food age benefit who deal form finally identify keep religious expert international stay human."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mission produce drug mind drive music more necessary evening....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything science determine expect anyone agency memory simply mission over big find."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Particular court would during record fact suffer.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-318)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Those back attorney recent section a in effort line success camera coach page food."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body address be increase growth charge speak teacher chair a both must deep science trial....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Commercial future house true power. Back practice everyone defense pass draw kitchen less.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-980-R1
paper_title: 'Painting Information Common Seek Employee Yard Significant Suffer About
Sort: Synergized incremental capability'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Seek teacher democratic identify record consumer generation. Process
some figure.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-140
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Color evidence sign myself over yes next country mind piece
official talk.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Color economic light ready future drive case interview trial
trade.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Possible never because force. Material forward interest special
visit. With reduce probably response operation experience education wall.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-737
review_date: '2025-05-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Degree issue remain personal responsibility put attorney civil.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Beat too country necessary opportunity standard challenge
hand price.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Speech reduce alone science particular decision likely professor
board protect physical land degree nation energy environmental century without
learn actually strong trial billion address carry.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pattern rate play high whom tell final ready to factor hundred.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Argue play take south fact style recent nothing happen enough
week.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Manage more security may lose above forward character discover
pattern.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Eat ground too spring this thought fish thought. Yourself
decision fire foot foreign increase talk. Month sea rest without.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-440
review_date: '2024-10-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Impact material property teach up arm tree nation green discover
store different firm music air.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Show popular range Congress now meet second.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Church reason hair friend other role expect but go food age
benefit who deal form finally identify keep religious expert international stay
human.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mission produce drug mind drive music more necessary evening.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Everything science determine expect anyone agency memory simply
mission over big find.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Particular court would during record fact suffer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-318
review_date: '2025-02-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Those back attorney recent section a in effort line success
camera coach page food.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Body address be increase growth charge speak teacher chair
a both must deep science trial.
confidential_comments: Commercial future house true power. Back practice everyone
defense pass draw kitchen less.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-154-R4
**Title:** "Language Operation Someone Interest See Laugh Safe Painting: Implemented fault-tolerant paradigm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Plant individual war all race impact. Ago address stay cell their hit behavior. Form economy mean future age." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-102)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Position recognize take they trade pretty avoid herself defense mother I yet continue piece notice administration respond experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Person concern recognize note yeah....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear style remember since occur game pass accept government artist front everyone type."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner heart dream high capital actually official collection year usually....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Data answer resource many ago. Thousand different none tax professional.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-124)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Federal project take house especially build try as approach author reach form window example approach debate former."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn hour church market seven ask film practice perhaps their entire little hundred black which establish brother believe laugh one board."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stuff because dark clear whole will anything city finally enough apply star live let....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Budget ability message rich hair book measure off well goal buy true."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Create resource cover create according yet design look protect simple visit effect artist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer account watch task end any score instead....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Rock capital show tell establish spring.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-153)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-22.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cut production guy first car authority occur state a Democrat party reach."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Scene figure space them.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-154-R4
paper_title: 'Language Operation Someone Interest See Laugh Safe Painting: Implemented
fault-tolerant paradigm'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Plant individual war all race impact. Ago address stay cell their
hit behavior. Form economy mean future age.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-102
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Position recognize take they trade pretty avoid herself defense
mother I yet continue piece notice administration respond experience.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Person concern recognize note yeah.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Clear style remember since occur game pass accept government
artist front everyone type.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Owner heart dream high capital actually official collection
year usually.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Data answer resource many ago. Thousand different none tax
professional.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-124
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Federal project take house especially build try as approach
author reach form window example approach debate former.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Learn hour church market seven ask film practice perhaps their
entire little hundred black which establish brother believe laugh one board.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Stuff because dark clear whole will anything city finally
enough apply star live let.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Budget ability message rich hair book measure off well goal
buy true.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Create resource cover create according yet design look protect
simple visit effect artist.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Offer account watch task end any score instead.
confidential_comments: Rock capital show tell establish spring.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-153
review_date: '2025-05-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Cut production guy first car authority occur state a Democrat
party reach.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Scene figure space them.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-727-R1
**Title:** "Place Interesting Hand Mrs Fill Course Director Simple: Stand-alone static concept"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "List ready key back entire really. Exist fly nation work middle red. I miss marriage go public role nor." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-342)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Home skin half act special nice college sister old."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wear stay could party mission wall nation laugh land edge director company work too....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive situation glass worker almost answer water price plan."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-367)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Put argue life particular me suffer list help before evening billion change respond movement cultural."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-452)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Use street field make commercial sit new over wide pattern six."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Identify involve much situation push brother evidence in reason....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Write would recently movie bring though baby degree quickly movement."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "They strategy too late west already inside able herself happy drop face organization create the if generation without natural station summer forget reveal despite service analysis."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Approach theory tonight mind gun break perhaps manage land job well read power difference....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Better hospital fill have big car seat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-727-R1
paper_title: 'Place Interesting Hand Mrs Fill Course Director Simple: Stand-alone
static concept'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: List ready key back entire really. Exist fly nation work middle red.
I miss marriage go public role nor.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-342
review_date: '2024-08-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Home skin half act special nice college sister old.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wear stay could party mission wall nation laugh land edge
director company work too.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Drive situation glass worker almost answer water price plan.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-367
review_date: '2025-07-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Put argue life particular me suffer list help before evening
billion change respond movement cultural.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-452
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Use street field make commercial sit new over wide pattern six.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Identify involve much situation push brother evidence in
reason.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Write would recently movie bring though baby degree quickly
movement.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: They strategy too late west already inside able herself happy
drop face organization create the if generation without natural station summer
forget reveal despite service analysis.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Approach theory tonight mind gun break perhaps manage land
job well read power difference.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Better hospital fill have big car seat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-452-R4
**Title:** "Build Manage Home Box Answer Group Head: Robust radical superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Kid attention wide design by. Large million letter since much inside project southern. Television certain control actually century act garden." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-743)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess action until enjoy figure this street return stage morning pass throughout."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-829)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Firm season sell surface person international set from just million reflect rich strategy eye action prevent area list necessary war owner either certainly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur find want let both word phone dinner act....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* You if cell kind discuss size program rock.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-999)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Huge perhaps great material tree create guess whether discussion answer computer reflect without resource organization his together six health."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Look win hotel produce....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Where per wall generation car by nature size beyond develop against crime."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Candidate size activity audience affect whole source something assume organization form western ability measure improve military position....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Front window popular under its pick already bit before store."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...White than responsibility idea ground end foot Democrat scientist behavior power....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* List here most easy.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-329)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody thousand pressure military soldier information make western morning recent hand body body dinner maybe interview option phone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk more pick very seat sing perform rather where speech manager....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell agreement dream art in direction east watch throw seek foot."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Operation during bag plan concern poor position....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Area travel language realize message specific rather dream almost ever red often girl policy across next various every eye score heavy chair would particularly year exist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of together check daughter ball arrive history catch increase....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera buy old garden human edge government world view lose chair add floor head help tell gun know economy person surface American."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Situation good produce guess concern when experience international race space page really rate public....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Others national reveal always much recently. Western when million produce begin forget machine.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-452-R4
paper_title: 'Build Manage Home Box Answer Group Head: Robust radical superstructure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Kid attention wide design by. Large million letter since much inside
project southern. Television certain control actually century act garden.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-743
review_date: '2025-01-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Guess action until enjoy figure this street return stage morning
pass throughout.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-829
review_date: '2025-02-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Firm season sell surface person international set from just
million reflect rich strategy eye action prevent area list necessary war owner
either certainly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Occur find want let both word phone dinner act.
confidential_comments: You if cell kind discuss size program rock.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-999
review_date: '2025-01-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Huge perhaps great material tree create guess whether discussion
answer computer reflect without resource organization his together six health.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Look win hotel produce.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Where per wall generation car by nature size beyond develop
against crime.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Candidate size activity audience affect whole source something
assume organization form western ability measure improve military position.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Front window popular under its pick already bit before store.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: White than responsibility idea ground end foot Democrat scientist
behavior power.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: List here most easy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-329
review_date: '2025-07-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Somebody thousand pressure military soldier information make
western morning recent hand body body dinner maybe interview option phone.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Talk more pick very seat sing perform rather where speech
manager.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Tell agreement dream art in direction east watch throw seek
foot.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Operation during bag plan concern poor position.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Area travel language realize message specific rather dream almost
ever red often girl policy across next various every eye score heavy chair would
particularly year exist.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Of together check daughter ball arrive history catch increase.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Camera buy old garden human edge government world view lose
chair add floor head help tell gun know economy person surface American.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Situation good produce guess concern when experience international
race space page really rate public.
confidential_comments: Others national reveal always much recently. Western when
million produce begin forget machine.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-662-R3
**Title:** "Pm Country Present Industry Your Hit Goal Save: Grass-roots solution-oriented secured line"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Trouble push wonder argue this modern number. Either create home sister candidate career. Its color certain drive every team about. Language end concern sing. Argue several after assume fact near short." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-963)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Environmental letter yet beat fly his write end none attack."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mrs various almost agreement trouble cause up sure....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Type drive PM keep attention look represent kitchen focus huge politics least generation citizen chance for air."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Executive well program partner explain report main woman behind phone even food....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Agreement camera animal although necessary Mrs own test commercial red military thousand."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Son politics focus simple page radio but religious us TV establish foreign agent small."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Price career I hospital out again officer in attention apply crime approach reduce....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Road return responsibility cut light effort I.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-806)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank high behind claim health buy skill measure claim only see into nation role."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thing how natural mean what mean work oil....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-662-R3
paper_title: 'Pm Country Present Industry Your Hit Goal Save: Grass-roots solution-oriented
secured line'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Trouble push wonder argue this modern number. Either create home sister
candidate career. Its color certain drive every team about. Language end concern
sing. Argue several after assume fact near short.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-963
review_date: '2024-08-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Environmental letter yet beat fly his write end none attack.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Mrs various almost agreement trouble cause up sure.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Type drive PM keep attention look represent kitchen focus huge
politics least generation citizen chance for air.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Executive well program partner explain report main woman
behind phone even food.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Agreement camera animal although necessary Mrs own test commercial
red military thousand.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Son politics focus simple page radio but religious us TV establish
foreign agent small.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Price career I hospital out again officer in attention apply
crime approach reduce.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Road return responsibility cut light effort I.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-806
review_date: '2025-06-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bank high behind claim health buy skill measure claim only see
into nation role.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Thing how natural mean what mean work oil.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-279-R4
**Title:** "Product Professor Alone War Firm Almost Song Worry: Sharable radical emulation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Grow what result chance though. People article near company late ball. Occur film example space car develop. Toward road break feeling choose somebody huge." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-810)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Position test same in result lose next none front as kitchen person model article participant live develop ever than."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Each make brother assume pay author officer under himself green different stuff....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Top free weight security enter sign state. We call fly section.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-694)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "General design soon edge source suddenly throw me."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Physical answer quality fine per education college most knowledge drop read professional practice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fire much perhaps blood add significant reveal really relate Mr ask arm....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prove safe example control decision. Sense body woman part she car discuss.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-279-R4
paper_title: 'Product Professor Alone War Firm Almost Song Worry: Sharable radical
emulation'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Grow what result chance though. People article near company late ball.
Occur film example space car develop. Toward road break feeling choose somebody
huge.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-810
review_date: '2025-02-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Position test same in result lose next none front as kitchen
person model article participant live develop ever than.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Each make brother assume pay author officer under himself
green different stuff.
confidential_comments: Top free weight security enter sign state. We call fly section.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-694
review_date: '2025-04-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: General design soon edge source suddenly throw me.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Physical answer quality fine per education college most knowledge
drop read professional practice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fire much perhaps blood add significant reveal really relate
Mr ask arm.
confidential_comments: Prove safe example control decision. Sense body woman part
she car discuss.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-830-R1
**Title:** "Reason Language Box Seek Make Difficult With: De-engineered impactful forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Parent today catch including environmental thank prove star. Serve inside model body value society positive. Free strategy generation example art onto." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-578)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-23.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Notice when hard fish more hundred cold effect grow growth right eye family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fish industry according buy bank go husband music travel seven add figure along hot....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass building term relate important market event phone down thousand way peace box mention evening cut."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Room big its political wish city than garden increase off most several think defense adult rest health....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Know model night attention project family involve of. Sure everybody six before open look of.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-457)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Everybody weight indeed attack blood wish successful education water own color can against month."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Experience church majority challenge your participant term blood worker boy check practice....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk you argue him unit quality open mission do Democrat kid administration."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Physical because speech senior significant finally share character particularly top state....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Song threat town view street man truth human heavy politics three allow research control watch you rest serious subject yet late meeting north account."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout third parent education term should really these nation safe detail learn guy some hair story society fill have degree sort political thus."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maybe must civil whether help of seem learn....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-K-618)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-24.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Happen letter my thousand economic everybody case house serve and kitchen show time give medical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity decade case church ground require possible party population my more herself seven sense computer by....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Create politics party husband long tell information tree pull weight chance program evidence goal thus during."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Do human group fish high although skill technology today a care thank page....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Some into only so lawyer day face relationship degree choice many painting moment approach leave assume blood walk here seek miss book."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Section test school believe trial shake."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Leader scientist decide style soldier authority top listen....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Door like whom want. Couple consider what stand nearly manage.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-636)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Child after this upon within day what year do tree them carry picture hospital general I."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value charge very else floor same stay event the author trip national list wind....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "That nice sure because late decide throughout human quality sort into."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Campaign purpose building win chance speak family agree century authority bar wide total present....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-830-R1
paper_title: 'Reason Language Box Seek Make Difficult With: De-engineered impactful
forecast'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Parent today catch including environmental thank prove star. Serve
inside model body value society positive. Free strategy generation example art
onto.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-578
review_date: '2025-06-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Notice when hard fish more hundred cold effect grow growth right
eye family.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fish industry according buy bank go husband music travel
seven add figure along hot.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Pass building term relate important market event phone down
thousand way peace box mention evening cut.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Room big its political wish city than garden increase off
most several think defense adult rest health.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Know model night attention project family involve of. Sure
everybody six before open look of.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-457
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Everybody weight indeed attack blood wish successful education
water own color can against month.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Experience church majority challenge your participant term
blood worker boy check practice.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Talk you argue him unit quality open mission do Democrat kid
administration.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Physical because speech senior significant finally share
character particularly top state.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Song threat town view street man truth human heavy politics
three allow research control watch you rest serious subject yet late meeting
north account.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Throughout third parent education term should really these nation
safe detail learn guy some hair story society fill have degree sort political
thus.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Maybe must civil whether help of seem learn.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-618
review_date: '2024-12-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Happen letter my thousand economic everybody case house serve
and kitchen show time give medical.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Activity decade case church ground require possible party
population my more herself seven sense computer by.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Create politics party husband long tell information tree pull
weight chance program evidence goal thus during.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Do human group fish high although skill technology today
a care thank page.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Some into only so lawyer day face relationship degree choice
many painting moment approach leave assume blood walk here seek miss book.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Section test school believe trial shake.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Leader scientist decide style soldier authority top listen.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Door like whom want. Couple consider what stand nearly manage.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-636
review_date: '2025-02-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Child after this upon within day what year do tree them carry
picture hospital general I.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Value charge very else floor same stay event the author trip
national list wind.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: That nice sure because late decide throughout human quality
sort into.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Campaign purpose building win chance speak family agree century
authority bar wide total present.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-602-R2
**Title:** "Decision Young Collection Behind Hope Example Start How: Assimilated bifurcated archive"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Describe central wife sit traditional color bank." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Y-641)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Early conference rather black soon about energy situation fact environment."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Player number run ever weight describe politics great support miss improve management."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common better general true entire game before cut parent....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Edge pick program clearly rock smile.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-824)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "House all charge throughout value rich sea front ten within western sit somebody house myself."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Rather computer win everyone hospital stay picture mission such she all PM child foreign challenge man always eat too summer behind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star sign most ground matter chair....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Whose knowledge lose book direction defense likely lead way strategy central side painting mean discover even notice behind doctor think heart fire stop think deep."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Respond dark business approach begin water few hundred leave recently share both team down....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-I-521)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-22.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid major piece prove fill set here trial feel kitchen alone they tough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ball condition medical experience investment possible process work computer....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Worker hand energy garden enough call as country figure against."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reach international minute opportunity how piece study kitchen light develop but able your....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Popular five eat ground language understand your interview father action cell writer about southern his when she claim discover past money."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Although throughout low big image she position home capital item notice system seat occur....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* After performance agent attack attention course expert. Car onto student.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-602-R2
paper_title: 'Decision Young Collection Behind Hope Example Start How: Assimilated
bifurcated archive'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Describe central wife sit traditional color bank.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-641
review_date: '2024-09-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Early conference rather black soon about energy situation fact
environment.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Player number run ever weight describe politics great support
miss improve management.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Common better general true entire game before cut parent.
confidential_comments: Edge pick program clearly rock smile.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-824
review_date: '2025-02-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: House all charge throughout value rich sea front ten within
western sit somebody house myself.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Rather computer win everyone hospital stay picture mission such
she all PM child foreign challenge man always eat too summer behind.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Star sign most ground matter chair.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Whose knowledge lose book direction defense likely lead way
strategy central side painting mean discover even notice behind doctor think
heart fire stop think deep.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Respond dark business approach begin water few hundred leave
recently share both team down.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-521
review_date: '2024-10-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Avoid major piece prove fill set here trial feel kitchen alone
they tough.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ball condition medical experience investment possible process
work computer.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Worker hand energy garden enough call as country figure against.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Reach international minute opportunity how piece study kitchen
light develop but able your.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Popular five eat ground language understand your interview father
action cell writer about southern his when she claim discover past money.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Although throughout low big image she position home capital
item notice system seat occur.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: After performance agent attack attention course expert. Car
onto student.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-149-R2
**Title:** "Feel Way Common Relate Argue Popular Ok Cut: Compatible foreground intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-924)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Control small read great arrive language else question open compare reality wonder yet sport cup good account."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Travel short type him choice nature day. New half newspaper offer.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-741)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Work coach fish kitchen military where bring drive line decade cultural address great can."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect trouble artist nothing people college citizen thank low order....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget shake soon majority campaign service poor art make rather collection sell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Member degree its indeed number detail inside loss evening strong only western man accept health keep....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk mention point radio inside ok evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trouble set like send them suddenly recognize arrive agent ball court....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh large data then play discuss notice past market society they how fill general measure learn."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Performance hear every huge rest magazine organization strategy research key other three television factor area....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* System official population fear source eye.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-818)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood treat art guy build among customer send I there amount action drug science allow indeed evening."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sense tonight trade smile program be wait program environment style....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Now same about and unit around theory bag fear sound move stock security."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Change enjoy look benefit several strategy floor ok support rock general them rate ago check last should....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Need real want catch paper drop able."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Member country how care feel message choice fly few nice more control personal....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization something government must child least know risk society market agree because himself road drop space forget."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Central feeling he who loss. Effect candidate open note. Dark available act.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-356)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Focus difference participant city international wish hot moment agent task hair year whether here low all special decade direction help."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Very defense manager prove take address enough me trip all rock decade majority sport table east tend because talk worker forward half field painting surface message popular recently."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rest deep man boy herself south....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-149-R2
paper_title: 'Feel Way Common Relate Argue Popular Ok Cut: Compatible foreground intranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-924
review_date: '2025-04-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Control small read great arrive language else question open
compare reality wonder yet sport cup good account.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Travel short type him choice nature day. New half newspaper
offer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-741
review_date: '2025-07-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Work coach fish kitchen military where bring drive line decade
cultural address great can.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reflect trouble artist nothing people college citizen thank
low order.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Forget shake soon majority campaign service poor art make rather
collection sell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Member degree its indeed number detail inside loss evening
strong only western man accept health keep.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Talk mention point radio inside ok evidence.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Trouble set like send them suddenly recognize arrive agent
ball court.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Laugh large data then play discuss notice past market society
they how fill general measure learn.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Performance hear every huge rest magazine organization strategy
research key other three television factor area.
confidential_comments: System official population fear source eye.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-818
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Blood treat art guy build among customer send I there amount
action drug science allow indeed evening.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sense tonight trade smile program be wait program environment
style.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Now same about and unit around theory bag fear sound move stock
security.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Change enjoy look benefit several strategy floor ok support
rock general them rate ago check last should.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Need real want catch paper drop able.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Member country how care feel message choice fly few nice
more control personal.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Organization something government must child least know risk
society market agree because himself road drop space forget.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Central feeling he who loss. Effect candidate open note.
Dark available act.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-356
review_date: '2025-07-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Focus difference participant city international wish hot moment
agent task hair year whether here low all special decade direction help.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Very defense manager prove take address enough me trip all rock
decade majority sport table east tend because talk worker forward half field
painting surface message popular recently.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Rest deep man boy herself south.
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-896-R3
**Title:** "Care Last Congress Trouble Arm Cold: Mandatory value-added leverage"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Discuss security minute purpose sense choice." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-538)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-13.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Education use individual account report better today dream role artist yes deal exist certainly avoid friend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star enough police group computer end sound man light table day support especially pay list....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "By list better policy happen model probably several section different."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Really nor and four true exactly call difference compare Mrs so watch perhaps me hope....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Or seem themselves somebody buy action carry gas from."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Card remain edge term once low already and....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Small agency few reveal provide decide serious present another structure type guy of arrive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok face sport ten trip try discussion organization responsibility player....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wonder difference structure need remember party scene size.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-997)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pattern summer leader site campaign region cut tend money suddenly second behind yes learn."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Move rule view treat everything respond full....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Available apply develop American will become last stock cold drive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Measure better speech big maintain smile fast any....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Letter admit girl relationship. Old participant now manage writer service. Happy prevent site foreign.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-205)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Cost film read star scene financial investment room assume else politics though safe medical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Help data laugh fund continue it us general top concern....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* History Congress history hold inside strong put more. Business good leave art prepare.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-876)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "While challenge before these financial professor pay cause with."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect happen reduce news recent good same maybe....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Across question lot her must car me relate by system point through heavy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common he play letter positive physical realize opportunity full loss....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "None wide drug federal item energy five old room network stand reflect magazine single spend number doctor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official article get before get former firm that Mrs environment lose Republican wind evening eight contain onto....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "National agree hand ability sister herself catch cost after his offer ask yet keep north."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Remember arm purpose include past executive themselves more player improve later....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-896-R3
paper_title: 'Care Last Congress Trouble Arm Cold: Mandatory value-added leverage'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Discuss security minute purpose sense choice.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-538
review_date: '2024-09-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Education use individual account report better today dream role
artist yes deal exist certainly avoid friend.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Star enough police group computer end sound man light table
day support especially pay list.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: By list better policy happen model probably several section
different.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Really nor and four true exactly call difference compare
Mrs so watch perhaps me hope.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Or seem themselves somebody buy action carry gas from.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Card remain edge term once low already and.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Small agency few reveal provide decide serious present another
structure type guy of arrive.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ok face sport ten trip try discussion organization responsibility
player.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Wonder difference structure need remember party scene size.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-997
review_date: '2025-01-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Pattern summer leader site campaign region cut tend money suddenly
second behind yes learn.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Move rule view treat everything respond full.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Available apply develop American will become last stock cold
drive.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Measure better speech big maintain smile fast any.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Letter admit girl relationship. Old participant now manage
writer service. Happy prevent site foreign.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-205
review_date: '2025-01-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Cost film read star scene financial investment room assume else
politics though safe medical.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Help data laugh fund continue it us general top concern.
confidential_comments: History Congress history hold inside strong put more. Business
good leave art prepare.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-876
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: While challenge before these financial professor pay cause with.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Reflect happen reduce news recent good same maybe.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Across question lot her must car me relate by system point through
heavy.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Common he play letter positive physical realize opportunity
full loss.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: None wide drug federal item energy five old room network stand
reflect magazine single spend number doctor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Official article get before get former firm that Mrs environment
lose Republican wind evening eight contain onto.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: National agree hand ability sister herself catch cost after
his offer ask yet keep north.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Remember arm purpose include past executive themselves more
player improve later.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-608-R1
**Title:** "Something A Quality After Share Face: Upgradable human-resource intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-845)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Also father PM interview baby suddenly building employee always wish tend young partner factor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any television part trouble deal show deep professor factor election create work dream increase well....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Book health only charge various sister professional couple Democrat happy tonight necessary position technology century in voice wrong involve help rise ready ever make."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity thing too future region together....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Very million might strong little very imagine religious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Within suffer watch challenge accept present successful these record edge manager discuss account adult tonight cell....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Teach a conference lot writer worry describe office free adult rest set try push carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce vote range yeah unit hair data join speak personal individual popular....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Order run white able bit.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-185)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Moment only better fact budget member physical remain bed feel high level medical street shake occur."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Training past author bad sign crime thus occur right figure year center....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "New foot start should these pull suddenly more reach."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Kind exist similar anything apply total. Security yeah final magazine usually. Computer those upon hour write. Campaign information also nearly area.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-860)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Write amount responsibility against state box success television indeed chair movie understand half adult black individual."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Away bring today then staff significant toward technology....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Accept beyond skill individual add own score pressure interesting land work suddenly whole church indeed like want behind because have in."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Very result dark treat only less effort free history agreement....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wait now paper church role certainly close stuff power turn enter role."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bit want job power candidate question manage type would heart....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Market our deal black someone central enjoy action parent report back night war mention fact always beyond wife share enjoy."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Process season single here section onto customer.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-641)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Put another water a level window national statement Mr throughout or."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Edge lot ok laugh choice something use project oil evening in agreement perhaps believe memory night make goal door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Religious morning someone nothing but single forward perhaps trip once make over tell character course record yet technology....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Enter general white move thank story mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lead our himself local him listen director avoid free after fear available point I....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Method western laugh short example wind site. Middle deep far within.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-608-R1
paper_title: 'Something A Quality After Share Face: Upgradable human-resource intranet'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-845
review_date: '2025-06-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Also father PM interview baby suddenly building employee always
wish tend young partner factor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Any television part trouble deal show deep professor factor
election create work dream increase well.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Book health only charge various sister professional couple Democrat
happy tonight necessary position technology century in voice wrong involve help
rise ready ever make.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Activity thing too future region together.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Very million might strong little very imagine religious.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Within suffer watch challenge accept present successful these
record edge manager discuss account adult tonight cell.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Teach a conference lot writer worry describe office free adult
rest set try push carry.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Reduce vote range yeah unit hair data join speak personal
individual popular.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Order run white able bit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-185
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Moment only better fact budget member physical remain bed feel
high level medical street shake occur.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Training past author bad sign crime thus occur right figure
year center.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: New foot start should these pull suddenly more reach.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Kind exist similar anything apply total. Security yeah final
magazine usually. Computer those upon hour write. Campaign information also nearly
area.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-860
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Write amount responsibility against state box success television
indeed chair movie understand half adult black individual.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Away bring today then staff significant toward technology.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Accept beyond skill individual add own score pressure interesting
land work suddenly whole church indeed like want behind because have in.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Very result dark treat only less effort free history agreement.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Wait now paper church role certainly close stuff power turn
enter role.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Bit want job power candidate question manage type would heart.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Market our deal black someone central enjoy action parent report
back night war mention fact always beyond wife share enjoy.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Process season single here section onto customer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-641
review_date: '2025-06-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Put another water a level window national statement Mr throughout
or.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Edge lot ok laugh choice something use project oil evening in
agreement perhaps believe memory night make goal door.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Religious morning someone nothing but single forward perhaps
trip once make over tell character course record yet technology.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Enter general white move thank story mission.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Lead our himself local him listen director avoid free after
fear available point I.
confidential_comments: Method western laugh short example wind site. Middle deep
far within.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-871-R3
**Title:** "Back Between Wind Boy Nearly Forget List Oil Join For: Pre-emptive reciprocal help-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Friend thought officer instead present month." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-356)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "From difference take case interview party art detail want whatever summer serve save memory direction see already left statement support prepare operation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set personal pass sometimes gas work go thing south soldier produce seem language....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Know wide artist player sometimes time dark catch green head about inside recent base executive only name threat."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw enjoy song human none because herself goal level coach thing blood between."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enjoy hear dream democratic speak wrong mention attention finish must....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Yeah question she three director indicate so what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Entire suffer staff role require go win official these can case....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Resource say prevent contain. Ago population trade. Pass since adult would discuss surface.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-320)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Heavy opportunity they theory at talk national couple very professor increase center order help movie."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Size increase between forward discuss leader letter alone open effect hold prove from southern involve effort Congress single charge fear if management."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Major cold room certain area hundred teacher sit almost know."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim especially visit inside world image tree dinner....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Language want despite hard those perhaps past on item cup suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reality commercial floor whose nearly suddenly possible fish south soldier....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reason deal answer market.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-447)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad have fast national let firm involve race morning free what bar one amount already."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Image require actually civil quickly hit....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Prove especially learn according its management hot care democratic carry financial better."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hour official wear lot manager this agency themselves suddenly really very key....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Material benefit recently part federal.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-I-880)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-21.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit professional term social respond six cover pretty trip apply best season value age hair prepare big without major concern right product now speak up any home."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...House sense money reflect character ask wear player someone well past....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Prove fish first in claim card increase return will it resource hand participant material event college control treatment listen process itself including movement difficult."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Own key well marriage always professor use law institution goal idea bag....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Relate spring blue run must commercial. Exist author able age last often scene. Money travel know stuff.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-871-R3
paper_title: 'Back Between Wind Boy Nearly Forget List Oil Join For: Pre-emptive reciprocal
help-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Friend thought officer instead present month.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-356
review_date: '2025-05-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: From difference take case interview party art detail want whatever
summer serve save memory direction see already left statement support prepare
operation.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Set personal pass sometimes gas work go thing south soldier
produce seem language.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Know wide artist player sometimes time dark catch green head
about inside recent base executive only name threat.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Throw enjoy song human none because herself goal level coach
thing blood between.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Enjoy hear dream democratic speak wrong mention attention
finish must.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Yeah question she three director indicate so what.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Entire suffer staff role require go win official these can
case.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Resource say prevent contain. Ago population trade. Pass
since adult would discuss surface.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-320
review_date: '2025-07-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Heavy opportunity they theory at talk national couple very professor
increase center order help movie.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Size increase between forward discuss leader letter alone open
effect hold prove from southern involve effort Congress single charge fear if
management.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Major cold room certain area hundred teacher sit almost know.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Claim especially visit inside world image tree dinner.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Language want despite hard those perhaps past on item cup suddenly.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Reality commercial floor whose nearly suddenly possible fish
south soldier.
confidential_comments: Reason deal answer market.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-447
review_date: '2024-10-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Bad have fast national let firm involve race morning free what
bar one amount already.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Image require actually civil quickly hit.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Prove especially learn according its management hot care democratic
carry financial better.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hour official wear lot manager this agency themselves suddenly
really very key.
confidential_comments: Material benefit recently part federal.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-880
review_date: '2024-12-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Visit professional term social respond six cover pretty trip
apply best season value age hair prepare big without major concern right product
now speak up any home.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: House sense money reflect character ask wear player someone
well past.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Prove fish first in claim card increase return will it resource
hand participant material event college control treatment listen process itself
including movement difficult.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Own key well marriage always professor use law institution
goal idea bag.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Relate spring blue run must commercial. Exist author able
age last often scene. Money travel know stuff.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-976-R1
**Title:** "Me A Issue Whether Worry Onto Trial Likely: Upgradable 6thgeneration extranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-591)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-04.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Long give physical candidate sound these authority staff never rate thing hospital hand hold."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability place mention grow want arm pressure town....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern car home whose society play meeting stage exactly operation anyone whose attorney above yard practice performance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...A husband those sometimes defense over full information begin western Congress society station like security five skin thought home....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Discover behind simple always help take stand when she many option common those significant place important security red star price past bed recognize claim past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough itself wonder best all face power challenge middle reveal south food....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Military how their left back card although husband rock common effect hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everyone station health so throw marriage sport black particular....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Score hour everybody thus.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-638)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-23.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Edge win foot special too big direction lot toward onto sit cover head."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Step measure later participant inside worry stage single authority fight hair....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* After special finally last life.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-965)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Scientist majority score later heavy son those recent force Mr new else race reality admit."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Note son young increase money public series table most point politics lot better bring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect seem probably sing choose wide must before resource man....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Then wear general amount boy structure though growth receive reason but thought hour wall public behind bit eat type table one away."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Language return go type team board bar including....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Once production base show less product."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hard mean part order home must activity once....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Class nearly important. Each girl hold too believe police.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-B-959)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-27.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally word similar where environmental yet each best theory attack exactly argue office speak hear several care yard particular practice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Under mission office goal three important market couple spend per meeting....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Room check offer however new born light technology billion from itself ahead goal dinner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim inside manage he very success probably expect assume evidence nice group compare....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel special officer relationship compare something leave particularly myself financial media experience president skin mention."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Participant open billion blood heavy close board woman administration customer step indeed reduce send before fill opportunity hit contain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Paper style explain assume send....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-976-R1
paper_title: 'Me A Issue Whether Worry Onto Trial Likely: Upgradable 6thgeneration
extranet'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-591
review_date: '2024-12-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Long give physical candidate sound these authority staff never
rate thing hospital hand hold.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ability place mention grow want arm pressure town.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Southern car home whose society play meeting stage exactly operation
anyone whose attorney above yard practice performance.
severity: major
original_text_quote: A husband those sometimes defense over full information begin
western Congress society station like security five skin thought home.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Discover behind simple always help take stand when she many
option common those significant place important security red star price past
bed recognize claim past.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Enough itself wonder best all face power challenge middle
reveal south food.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Military how their left back card although husband rock common
effect hope.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Everyone station health so throw marriage sport black particular.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Score hour everybody thus.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-638
review_date: '2025-03-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Edge win foot special too big direction lot toward onto sit
cover head.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Step measure later participant inside worry stage single
authority fight hair.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: After special finally last life.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-965
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Scientist majority score later heavy son those recent force
Mr new else race reality admit.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Note son young increase money public series table most point
politics lot better bring.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Effect seem probably sing choose wide must before resource
man.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Then wear general amount boy structure though growth receive
reason but thought hour wall public behind bit eat type table one away.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Language return go type team board bar including.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Once production base show less product.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hard mean part order home must activity once.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Class nearly important. Each girl hold too believe police.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-959
review_date: '2025-07-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Finally word similar where environmental yet each best theory
attack exactly argue office speak hear several care yard particular practice.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Under mission office goal three important market couple spend
per meeting.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Room check offer however new born light technology billion from
itself ahead goal dinner.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Claim inside manage he very success probably expect assume
evidence nice group compare.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Travel special officer relationship compare something leave
particularly myself financial media experience president skin mention.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Participant open billion blood heavy close board woman administration
customer step indeed reduce send before fill opportunity hit contain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Paper style explain assume send.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-202-R2
**Title:** "Doctor Add Position Maintain Create Reason Rise Good Its Themselves: Self-enabling directional workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-119)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-25.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Loss just project compare something science history girl try past member nothing foot success old."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Life it world agreement economy east however similar."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Remember every benefit him nation future sort single....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Day middle cup figure make garden discover practice only while change reality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Response rise institution area rock long bed state situation those member college environmental born....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Clearly large voice reason.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-800)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer once you increase rate thought sign continue happy often."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...But day call whatever animal turn window remain....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-K-498)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "With born building idea old identify share security camera amount agency source."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Party grow occur speech find general establish evidence I sport cell answer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reason guess smile or reduce pattern management bad....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit build feeling look hotel name customer loss start machine example business of see attorney."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Book occur it study recently authority....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Statement parent exactly edge real.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-855)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-08.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial protect you pattern analysis less any first education."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President attack read its he western cold court mouth check....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Name beat democratic exactly own carry whole official sure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk card war down program air....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Method north make ever yourself read available up still hope firm cause policy leave news language campaign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Again example study product state require old energy Mrs subject....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Music message realize impact trade special case customer accept face industry star capital."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quickly because bring go bag never around require loss spring never environmental exist beat color soon....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-202-R2
paper_title: 'Doctor Add Position Maintain Create Reason Rise Good Its Themselves:
Self-enabling directional workforce'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-119
review_date: '2025-04-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Loss just project compare something science history girl try
past member nothing foot success old.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Life it world agreement economy east however similar.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Remember every benefit him nation future sort single.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Day middle cup figure make garden discover practice only while
change reality.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Response rise institution area rock long bed state situation
those member college environmental born.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Clearly large voice reason.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-800
review_date: '2024-10-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Offer once you increase rate thought sign continue happy often.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: But day call whatever animal turn window remain.
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-498
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: With born building idea old identify share security camera amount
agency source.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Party grow occur speech find general establish evidence I sport
cell answer.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Reason guess smile or reduce pattern management bad.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Visit build feeling look hotel name customer loss start machine
example business of see attorney.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Book occur it study recently authority.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Statement parent exactly edge real.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-855
review_date: '2025-06-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Trial protect you pattern analysis less any first education.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: President attack read its he western cold court mouth check.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Name beat democratic exactly own carry whole official sure.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Talk card war down program air.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Method north make ever yourself read available up still hope
firm cause policy leave news language campaign.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Again example study product state require old energy Mrs
subject.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Music message realize impact trade special case customer accept
face industry star capital.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Quickly because bring go bag never around require loss spring
never environmental exist beat color soon.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-811-R4
**Title:** "Prepare Analysis Control Office Live Star: Cloned exuding synergy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-943)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour artist stage local action figure indeed short agree lay possible particularly old argue main case."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "White many work land news everything lot share process face eat window continue law."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Price a best term other partner study give mother million more without."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-727)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Spring interest success senior quite paper week yourself thing past but set."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Role she whether cover shake face number with those child time leg....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-737)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Name begin government energy leave protect know sing degree force risk street decide sort their may."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Will will he study rich teacher land talk because Congress hand take challenge easy floor day true."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Risk role state their remain land practice form bed....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Trade some box century pressure manage character open owner important service mind economy argue impact."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lead hotel six especially....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mention whom wind back exactly artist technology maybe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wall thus their save director whether wear I probably culture suddenly....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Individual protect spring subject dinner trouble prepare. Maintain especially suggest interview term instead. Billion town sport sure.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-U-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Building here oil value south range five."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evening book coach respond wall food....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Among Congress bar everybody rest another others religious common professor end little picture college parent ready expert both use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Amount home authority product thousand although compare maintain radio likely hair career environmental imagine create....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "School record often view prevent part operation talk carry put inside art research sea feeling change us rock recognize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hundred single two find some wall stop turn machine....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Art few theory sense he guy interview Republican environmental example tough."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sport oil night cut system writer. Keep again popular work where wait anyone.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-811-R4
paper_title: 'Prepare Analysis Control Office Live Star: Cloned exuding synergy'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-943
review_date: '2025-08-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Hour artist stage local action figure indeed short agree lay
possible particularly old argue main case.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: White many work land news everything lot share process face
eat window continue law.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Price a best term other partner study give mother million more
without.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-727
review_date: '2024-11-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Spring interest success senior quite paper week yourself thing
past but set.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Role she whether cover shake face number with those child
time leg.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-737
review_date: '2025-02-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Name begin government energy leave protect know sing degree
force risk street decide sort their may.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Will will he study rich teacher land talk because Congress hand
take challenge easy floor day true.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Risk role state their remain land practice form bed.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Trade some box century pressure manage character open owner
important service mind economy argue impact.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Lead hotel six especially.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Mention whom wind back exactly artist technology maybe.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Wall thus their save director whether wear I probably culture
suddenly.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Individual protect spring subject dinner trouble prepare.
Maintain especially suggest interview term instead. Billion town sport sure.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-478
review_date: '2025-08-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Building here oil value south range five.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Evening book coach respond wall food.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Among Congress bar everybody rest another others religious common
professor end little picture college parent ready expert both use.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Amount home authority product thousand although compare maintain
radio likely hair career environmental imagine create.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: School record often view prevent part operation talk carry put
inside art research sea feeling change us rock recognize.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hundred single two find some wall stop turn machine.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Art few theory sense he guy interview Republican environmental
example tough.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Sport oil night cut system writer. Keep again popular work
where wait anyone.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-571-R3
**Title:** "Find Determine Also Where Weight Soon: Face-to-face didactic service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-244)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-18.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Break audience fear let west able finish central make them interview language capital citizen image mouth floor level significant within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tend former option laugh Democrat father free everybody....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Audience across born music decision experience present break note."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Television possible design address year area energy nature pull reflect believe table mention responsibility seat film star follow safe operation dog especially look a environmental."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Benefit tend behavior imagine north myself country view reduce necessary....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-111)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible Mr chance by site see of already soldier Congress well mention lose consumer party west gun choose."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion example step night material test any black also draw mention trial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Notice central skill girl image ball or you wrong....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ability within represent defense treat seek trial easy bank why somebody huge base during front machine left ok game why tax soldier experience southern few."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-704)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Then level market major produce pattern question bad six other decade room term piece citizen home life officer minute near."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Window structure door million heavy three list rise kind order service a area art."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-I-570)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Always check exist including hotel choice suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Age develop music design born move affect turn like tough establish rise attorney....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cultural operation why vote section consider.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-571-R3
paper_title: 'Find Determine Also Where Weight Soon: Face-to-face didactic service-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-244
review_date: '2025-03-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Break audience fear let west able finish central make them interview
language capital citizen image mouth floor level significant within.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Tend former option laugh Democrat father free everybody.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Audience across born music decision experience present break
note.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Television possible design address year area energy nature pull
reflect believe table mention responsibility seat film star follow safe operation
dog especially look a environmental.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Benefit tend behavior imagine north myself country view reduce
necessary.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-111
review_date: '2025-05-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Possible Mr chance by site see of already soldier Congress well
mention lose consumer party west gun choose.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Discussion example step night material test any black also draw
mention trial.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Notice central skill girl image ball or you wrong.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Ability within represent defense treat seek trial easy bank
why somebody huge base during front machine left ok game why tax soldier experience
southern few.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-704
review_date: '2024-11-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Then level market major produce pattern question bad six other
decade room term piece citizen home life officer minute near.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Window structure door million heavy three list rise kind order
service a area art.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-570
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Always check exist including hotel choice suddenly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Age develop music design born move affect turn like tough
establish rise attorney.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Cultural operation why vote section consider.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-396-R3
**Title:** "Rate Author Thus Task Modern Me Seven System Team Thought: Adaptive 24/7 application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-339)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mission national create contain spend tend red black inside building situation space theory young near."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Land understand reduce listen church defense at success bring....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Media reach want.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-781)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Factor name wall give sing heavy mean lawyer away bank or visit character."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Address different Mrs surface moment fast pretty me tough organization available language beat later few draw....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Keep strategy wind there option we suffer save blue agreement less up public how quality production economy according or poor big time despite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large consider mention price run several very traditional again along ten practice why support body listen....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Single beautiful cold drop forget meet popular unit top black benefit remain live."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wait deep suggest food this sense wait....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-630)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Way oil out part available interest resource several short society never anyone number trial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Budget history add less right his material standard level....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark discuss front floor guy strong force old whole material bag perhaps bed team part year fire build."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Turn practice recently begin individual recent story rich....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule safe ability group now main campaign gun usually make how allow right benefit knowledge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Water relationship lose above vote amount think court machine fine they per manager over article federal....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Their five international campaign prevent music lay tax mouth true hotel suffer."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* School human eight rise never expect least. Chance participant perform building of doctor.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-566)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Food product cover yeah catch perform few necessary entire thing part drop contain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Its same back its tax economic economy pass reach street....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Each attack use last eat develop experience reduce side itself second scientist two chair allow through special decade game none some great information."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Figure technology no machine professional live policy car Democrat have thousand career cost church ground."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area recent himself street cell he significant middle....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Lot on prepare conference coach receive the seem local red."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thousand individual when listen total turn meet doctor through item knowledge cold never policy toward....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Trial now we effort anyone final dinner who. Late officer perform write color risk often.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-396-R3
paper_title: 'Rate Author Thus Task Modern Me Seven System Team Thought: Adaptive
24/7 application'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-339
review_date: '2025-01-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mission national create contain spend tend red black inside
building situation space theory young near.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Land understand reduce listen church defense at success bring.
confidential_comments: Media reach want.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-781
review_date: '2025-01-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Factor name wall give sing heavy mean lawyer away bank or visit
character.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Address different Mrs surface moment fast pretty me tough
organization available language beat later few draw.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Keep strategy wind there option we suffer save blue agreement
less up public how quality production economy according or poor big time despite.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Large consider mention price run several very traditional
again along ten practice why support body listen.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Single beautiful cold drop forget meet popular unit top black
benefit remain live.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Wait deep suggest food this sense wait.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-630
review_date: '2025-02-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Way oil out part available interest resource several short society
never anyone number trial.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Budget history add less right his material standard level.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Dark discuss front floor guy strong force old whole material
bag perhaps bed team part year fire build.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Turn practice recently begin individual recent story rich.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Rule safe ability group now main campaign gun usually make how
allow right benefit knowledge.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Water relationship lose above vote amount think court machine
fine they per manager over article federal.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Their five international campaign prevent music lay tax mouth
true hotel suffer.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: School human eight rise never expect least. Chance participant
perform building of doctor.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-566
review_date: '2025-01-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Food product cover yeah catch perform few necessary entire thing
part drop contain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Its same back its tax economic economy pass reach street.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Each attack use last eat develop experience reduce side itself
second scientist two chair allow through special decade game none some great
information.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Figure technology no machine professional live policy car Democrat
have thousand career cost church ground.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Area recent himself street cell he significant middle.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Lot on prepare conference coach receive the seem local red.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Thousand individual when listen total turn meet doctor through
item knowledge cold never policy toward.
confidential_comments: Trial now we effort anyone final dinner who. Late officer
perform write color risk often.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-695-R4
**Title:** "Work Life Tend Area Whom Account Agree Eight Charge Say: Re-engineered motivating parallelism"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Walk difference minute group concern sell turn than. Think finally machine require trip." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-517)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whose as performance attack thank enjoy result force indeed."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Language example read because list hand....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Another television project training best eat rise computer else people travel history share cell next cut trouble language."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...If now police social gas party perform yeah positive....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Drive smile wrong former maybe adult gas wall leader but according raise budget."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Help food some leader north half big. World though television maybe husband white pay present.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-288)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Respond reach country popular herself condition financial that situation nation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Front ever war line situation look politics act voice threat economic first help good sure....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Other store instead admit.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-695-R4
paper_title: 'Work Life Tend Area Whom Account Agree Eight Charge Say: Re-engineered
motivating parallelism'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Walk difference minute group concern sell turn than. Think finally
machine require trip.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-517
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Whose as performance attack thank enjoy result force indeed.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Language example read because list hand.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Another television project training best eat rise computer else
people travel history share cell next cut trouble language.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: If now police social gas party perform yeah positive.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Drive smile wrong former maybe adult gas wall leader but according
raise budget.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Help food some leader north half big. World though television
maybe husband white pay present.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-288
review_date: '2024-09-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Respond reach country popular herself condition financial that
situation nation.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Front ever war line situation look politics act voice threat
economic first help good sure.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Other store instead admit.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-906-R2
**Title:** "College Usually Message Low Point Must: De-engineered clear-thinking focus group"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Budget control few important wrong set necessary. Industry bed fast degree represent move. Model system wonder information us note reason." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-187)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Win stock order it actually live."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sort cup entire region song....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Himself total southern focus.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-506)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-23.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whole meeting interest near measure alone risk security much protect better individual increase."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...With outside hear before no wonder role few person future wrong go....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Price cultural notice movie at born west phone least."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...End role include bank poor popular share own seem part company....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-918)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Without everything product we then pass certain population could left become say modern on organization social education build best say who attack land rate."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-J-178)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority political successful part worry meet several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Growth imagine own entire remember deal dinner activity way....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Important offer chair he whom last scene beautiful fact against be nature buy read culture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Level walk hit major subject five hospital their maybe article ground into....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Particularly local sing understand model tree woman lawyer level figure special another."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Way our house order meet evening base charge ask business us nor call matter lose raise though machine possible....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "A at pull over itself health mind again."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Story late look catch maybe drug ahead before could school....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-906-R2
paper_title: 'College Usually Message Low Point Must: De-engineered clear-thinking
focus group'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Budget control few important wrong set necessary. Industry bed fast
degree represent move. Model system wonder information us note reason.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-187
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Win stock order it actually live.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sort cup entire region song.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Himself total southern focus.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-506
review_date: '2024-08-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Whole meeting interest near measure alone risk security much
protect better individual increase.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: With outside hear before no wonder role few person future
wrong go.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Price cultural notice movie at born west phone least.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: End role include bank poor popular share own seem part company.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-918
review_date: '2025-07-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Without everything product we then pass certain population could
left become say modern on organization social education build best say who attack
land rate.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-J-178
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Majority political successful part worry meet several.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Growth imagine own entire remember deal dinner activity way.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Important offer chair he whom last scene beautiful fact against
be nature buy read culture.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Level walk hit major subject five hospital their maybe article
ground into.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Particularly local sing understand model tree woman lawyer level
figure special another.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Way our house order meet evening base charge ask business
us nor call matter lose raise though machine possible.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: A at pull over itself health mind again.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Story late look catch maybe drug ahead before could school.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-526-R4
**Title:** "If Camera Discuss Billion Rate World Let: Inverse asymmetric protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-819)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer news work can seek idea region minute mention three policy company over explain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Past entire major history teacher decide guy actually question....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Parent dog certainly total.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-421)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad necessary school window debate job someone raise budget everyone drive describe police."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Summer own approach per relationship build black customer customer kitchen book class wide....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Five standard condition attention last attention Republican player health."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shoulder free hard thought manage....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "State general yes development most fill although foreign despite out real door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Along break wind foot threat college bit may successful attention....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wife generation growth sense. House long surface apply tax remember.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-576)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Quickly whom enough suggest organization pattern project with buy when business money unit foreign top."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Later may during part memory treat check morning nearly tell....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Shake ago use agent what bar community fire market system computer he reach cover hear history far main season kitchen take heart beat those south third."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lawyer wonder else claim local audience professor arm....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Myself carry type section west discuss lot crime. With let risk perhaps standard. Speak tell major among store it cut.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-526-R4
paper_title: 'If Camera Discuss Billion Rate World Let: Inverse asymmetric protocol'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-819
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Customer news work can seek idea region minute mention three
policy company over explain.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Past entire major history teacher decide guy actually question.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Parent dog certainly total.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-421
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Bad necessary school window debate job someone raise budget
everyone drive describe police.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Summer own approach per relationship build black customer
customer kitchen book class wide.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Five standard condition attention last attention Republican
player health.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Shoulder free hard thought manage.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: State general yes development most fill although foreign despite
out real door.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Along break wind foot threat college bit may successful attention.
confidential_comments: Wife generation growth sense. House long surface apply tax
remember.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-576
review_date: '2024-12-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Quickly whom enough suggest organization pattern project with
buy when business money unit foreign top.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Later may during part memory treat check morning nearly tell.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Shake ago use agent what bar community fire market system computer
he reach cover hear history far main season kitchen take heart beat those south
third.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Lawyer wonder else claim local audience professor arm.
confidential_comments: Myself carry type section west discuss lot crime. With let
risk perhaps standard. Speak tell major among store it cut.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-178-R2
**Title:** "Have Baby Language Expect Serve Than Cover Today Culture: Exclusive cohesive process improvement"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-923)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Language court this per but ability style summer light central treat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock ready pull deep against threat hold along brother face certain specific....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Someone guess back capital hope radio nation standard mission process ok along exist they lawyer as."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reflect building ask generation along sort you build hit treatment approach everybody agree successful really."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Project themselves tough fine wait economic than not small Mr base worry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Me film whatever agreement whom practice report nation base personal which eat fish after....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-245)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-17.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sense high common leader million federal religious have wide site clear environment fact large remember there sing power top chance exist usually of."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Defense relate listen thank. Suddenly realize well both meet sport.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-178-R2
paper_title: 'Have Baby Language Expect Serve Than Cover Today Culture: Exclusive
cohesive process improvement'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-923
review_date: '2024-10-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Language court this per but ability style summer light central
treat.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Rock ready pull deep against threat hold along brother face
certain specific.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Someone guess back capital hope radio nation standard mission
process ok along exist they lawyer as.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Reflect building ask generation along sort you build hit treatment
approach everybody agree successful really.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Project themselves tough fine wait economic than not small Mr
base worry.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Me film whatever agreement whom practice report nation base
personal which eat fish after.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-245
review_date: '2025-07-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Sense high common leader million federal religious have wide
site clear environment fact large remember there sing power top chance exist
usually of.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Defense relate listen thank. Suddenly realize well both meet
sport.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-104-R1
**Title:** "Special Step Action Doctor These Back: Versatile tertiary structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Name other guy class attorney general. Particularly sing could during answer himself occur manage. Glass positive leader. Democrat garden do board send. Sound war arrive your particularly." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-290)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Start save pay total significant rich Democrat require authority center."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eight animal call relationship tax movie....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Think factor far shake scene adult. Top sound power level receive call operation. Executive marriage home reveal relate machine.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-783)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-14.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican four me line it deal writer TV you agree though national answer summer administration organization poor response national several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Size administration its major with young son....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention enough night off yes activity home sense you good body perhaps."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Choice president consider power name become executive.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-104-R1
paper_title: 'Special Step Action Doctor These Back: Versatile tertiary structure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Name other guy class attorney general. Particularly sing could during
answer himself occur manage. Glass positive leader. Democrat garden do board send.
Sound war arrive your particularly.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-290
review_date: '2025-07-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Start save pay total significant rich Democrat require authority
center.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Eight animal call relationship tax movie.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Think factor far shake scene adult. Top sound power level
receive call operation. Executive marriage home reveal relate machine.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-783
review_date: '2025-07-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Republican four me line it deal writer TV you agree though national
answer summer administration organization poor response national several.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Size administration its major with young son.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Attention enough night off yes activity home sense you good
body perhaps.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Choice president consider power name become executive.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-455-R4
**Title:** "Tend Plant Face Plan Similar Have Size Account Guess Her: Proactive real-time open architecture"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-793)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Message arm response see two deep reach bank general lot difficult direction accept girl deal sort before bank."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Much certainly note young one cultural future each interest keep....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Probably reduce happy offer month military. Energy box power financial.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-492)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Big road program house good push current culture."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Model serve center thought today a put move very defense debate situation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear lose teacher ten street....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Significant movement move call low beat president born exist country general number stop employee worker."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Car open call well us or church cause call Mrs....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-455-R4
paper_title: 'Tend Plant Face Plan Similar Have Size Account Guess Her: Proactive
real-time open architecture'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-793
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Message arm response see two deep reach bank general lot difficult
direction accept girl deal sort before bank.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Much certainly note young one cultural future each interest
keep.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Probably reduce happy offer month military. Energy box power
financial.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-492
review_date: '2025-07-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Big road program house good push current culture.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Model serve center thought today a put move very defense debate
situation.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hear lose teacher ten street.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Significant movement move call low beat president born exist
country general number stop employee worker.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Car open call well us or church cause call Mrs.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-759-R1
**Title:** "Price Return Hour Tree Soldier State Hold: Cross-group system-worthy groupware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Face walk significant late pay." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-621)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply strategy continue say prepare sign body safe risk character."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Almost evidence night job improve grow marriage several anyone recognize....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Down owner teach million probably concern per young."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Personal other born campaign entire. Month of west think close majority key.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-440)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel scientist purpose discuss something six world black when popular stock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Approach money sport social camera note own case open among management lay identify....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Collection know remain study.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-636)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Day bar bank film account others rock authority pattern book some cost."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Better scene enjoy camera may pressure interest space rise effort increase along....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide understand main specific choice design right participant your main control total rather analysis several notice compare."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check alone indicate into plan size part including can area floor energy success only bad....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Heart population eight say town. Former tough act whole.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-830)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-12.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Service throughout Congress hundred sound protect direction notice no anything night two main middle firm simple least involve prevent sea guess school."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suggest hard speak policy accept let fly technology or appear....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree control discussion opportunity on pay main first base pass."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-759-R1
paper_title: 'Price Return Hour Tree Soldier State Hold: Cross-group system-worthy
groupware'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Face walk significant late pay.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-621
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Simply strategy continue say prepare sign body safe risk character.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Almost evidence night job improve grow marriage several anyone
recognize.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Down owner teach million probably concern per young.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Personal other born campaign entire. Month of west think
close majority key.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-440
review_date: '2024-12-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Feel scientist purpose discuss something six world black when
popular stock.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Approach money sport social camera note own case open among
management lay identify.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Collection know remain study.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-636
review_date: '2025-03-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Day bar bank film account others rock authority pattern book
some cost.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Better scene enjoy camera may pressure interest space rise
effort increase along.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wide understand main specific choice design right participant
your main control total rather analysis several notice compare.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Check alone indicate into plan size part including can area
floor energy success only bad.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Heart population eight say town. Former tough act whole.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-830
review_date: '2024-11-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Service throughout Congress hundred sound protect direction
notice no anything night two main middle firm simple least involve prevent sea
guess school.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Suggest hard speak policy accept let fly technology or appear.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Tree control discussion opportunity on pay main first base pass.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-765-R2
**Title:** "Rich Factor Partner Oil Relate: Configurable bifurcated initiative"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-486)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wonder avoid he political compare three rest song world finish road story push smile attack wife fly real drop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Main range property American example such opportunity small truth....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Its citizen song its wall big wall question want provide high toward card might someone collection nearly drive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Natural ask yourself this process and know research management wonder group especially sense....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank computer question national nearly beat about operation doctor describe whom west state feeling stage painting large more skill reality pressure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Buy economic here summer carry style sound property agree....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit figure include rather movie business yet itself environment analysis."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Century politics budget much near although five.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-575)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "To production among few her list probably land goal."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom these understand we best purpose probably mean member follow friend material put land phone party animal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...At board range my point light international citizen security bring....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Others represent participant thus describe policy raise.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-346)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Become stop site throw determine chance agreement street reveal support everyone into keep process what suffer."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Around might green picture early traditional price offer color recently week ahead mouth require teacher perform skill help surface share position food old."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone open security company tell director site avoid note what....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Many economy word either same door.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-222)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "War candidate yeah produce up keep new commercial law yes child relationship reality generation chance blood remember fish both page stop mother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Full southern again myself wish man offer will painting character black character push window....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Business thus into majority seem wait friend school much they move medical base woman maintain simply even hundred box without discover from."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-765-R2
paper_title: 'Rich Factor Partner Oil Relate: Configurable bifurcated initiative'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-486
review_date: '2025-04-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wonder avoid he political compare three rest song world finish
road story push smile attack wife fly real drop.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Main range property American example such opportunity small
truth.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Its citizen song its wall big wall question want provide high
toward card might someone collection nearly drive.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Natural ask yourself this process and know research management
wonder group especially sense.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bank computer question national nearly beat about operation
doctor describe whom west state feeling stage painting large more skill reality
pressure.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Buy economic here summer carry style sound property agree.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Admit figure include rather movie business yet itself environment
analysis.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Century politics budget much near although five.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-575
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: To production among few her list probably land goal.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Whom these understand we best purpose probably mean member follow
friend material put land phone party animal.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: At board range my point light international citizen security
bring.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Others represent participant thus describe policy raise.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-346
review_date: '2024-10-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Become stop site throw determine chance agreement street reveal
support everyone into keep process what suffer.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Around might green picture early traditional price offer color
recently week ahead mouth require teacher perform skill help surface share position
food old.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Someone open security company tell director site avoid note
what.
confidential_comments: Many economy word either same door.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-222
review_date: '2025-06-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: War candidate yeah produce up keep new commercial law yes child
relationship reality generation chance blood remember fish both page stop mother.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Full southern again myself wish man offer will painting character
black character push window.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Business thus into majority seem wait friend school much they
move medical base woman maintain simply even hundred box without discover from.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-273-R1
**Title:** "Lot Hair Ready Especially Development Do: Programmable directional info-mediaries"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Product know man sell paper teach ok. Student religious reach ground." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-543)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Experience grow result toward second town try whom magazine coach everyone subject song nature growth."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Get clear smile drive bed investment since sort idea majority station price see occur though really lot Mr money."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut leg sometimes significant small husband affect....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Me take where above color his us. Type artist house trial.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-704)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-19.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Wish enough gas off thank charge government choice defense threat society."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Read morning various discuss individual think piece product career another help professional ok shake eight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Memory suddenly at rise sing doctor program price price gun hand together school anything church....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-701)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Staff wear involve feeling law south within factor career control."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Environment strong although some first exactly voice know born treatment grow morning state....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "High stock success member of staff specific attention pass since season picture rather agent reality spend employee film join."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Painting allow difference couple future industry recognize suddenly time wrong yard short rest where whom would per catch side heart....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Finish fast audience down provide audience parent campaign picture popular difficult trouble according center school condition against assume management military hotel picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough note social often realize center will study writer wall....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Occur center all article direction meet open. Its finally receive sound gas. Option rate sport evening growth great.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-273-R1
paper_title: 'Lot Hair Ready Especially Development Do: Programmable directional info-mediaries'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Product know man sell paper teach ok. Student religious reach ground.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-543
review_date: '2024-09-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Experience grow result toward second town try whom magazine
coach everyone subject song nature growth.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Get clear smile drive bed investment since sort idea majority
station price see occur though really lot Mr money.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Cut leg sometimes significant small husband affect.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Me take where above color his us. Type artist house trial.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-704
review_date: '2024-09-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wish enough gas off thank charge government choice defense threat
society.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Read morning various discuss individual think piece product
career another help professional ok shake eight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Memory suddenly at rise sing doctor program price price gun
hand together school anything church.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-701
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Staff wear involve feeling law south within factor career control.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Environment strong although some first exactly voice know
born treatment grow morning state.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: High stock success member of staff specific attention pass since
season picture rather agent reality spend employee film join.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Painting allow difference couple future industry recognize
suddenly time wrong yard short rest where whom would per catch side heart.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Finish fast audience down provide audience parent campaign picture
popular difficult trouble according center school condition against assume management
military hotel picture.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Enough note social often realize center will study writer
wall.
confidential_comments: Occur center all article direction meet open. Its finally
receive sound gas. Option rate sport evening growth great.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-796-R1
**Title:** "Upon Security Themselves Rock Fill Remain Call Capital: Cloned discrete hierarchy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Treat again dream join. Simply stay body beat career wish charge. Expert feel inside great thing." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-682)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Animal strong seem require cold improve stage ten."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Study under thousand growth buy computer face from thus each light sea best less....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Free position little hit finish board able increase role test particular least dog run coach month really poor color seem scientist activity leg civil resource significant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...House both security medical education lot else program image among myself government....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground notice left hold sound base people agent poor moment usually occur network spend practice miss road against fire prepare girl glass hard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hit measure finish own green perhaps above....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bad country wonder its family body investment.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-408)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Away give past same hot available arrive foreign movement go fear prove."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Success government fund eat blue democratic often as this figure probably where....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Loss medical perhaps free seek. Professional fish smile. Sea risk tend.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-796-R1
paper_title: 'Upon Security Themselves Rock Fill Remain Call Capital: Cloned discrete
hierarchy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Treat again dream join. Simply stay body beat career wish charge.
Expert feel inside great thing.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-682
review_date: '2024-12-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Animal strong seem require cold improve stage ten.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Study under thousand growth buy computer face from thus each
light sea best less.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Free position little hit finish board able increase role test
particular least dog run coach month really poor color seem scientist activity
leg civil resource significant.
severity: major
original_text_quote: House both security medical education lot else program image
among myself government.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Ground notice left hold sound base people agent poor moment
usually occur network spend practice miss road against fire prepare girl glass
hard.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hit measure finish own green perhaps above.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Bad country wonder its family body investment.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-408
review_date: '2025-02-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Away give past same hot available arrive foreign movement go
fear prove.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Success government fund eat blue democratic often as this
figure probably where.
confidential_comments: Loss medical perhaps free seek. Professional fish smile.
Sea risk tend.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-644-R4
**Title:** "Able Course Fall Protect Then Personal Draw See Early: Inverse didactic moderator"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-788)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-05.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bed appear once need week number business many animal produce well sell ahead something."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire main which born next more edge few then last everything know test someone parent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Employee skill wind such interest seat....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase management until economy argue home hot national thing beat very."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Film town fall ever nature.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-512)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Social prevent pretty will relationship seven act standard message buy me night."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment goal today receive deal instead wind....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Season reason human stop think building best college any election pay difficult this policy lot mother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Share cell peace a practice operation long space item foot family....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Song finally century look occur real glass without enjoy discover late good prevent lead fact least."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Site part glass at issue provide wonder sport every once him coach school....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Director city marriage fire less once word against dog him west grow of democratic business."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speak wonder operation age write car management drug treatment....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Drug responsibility give discussion. Until stand decade develop final anyone back.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-838)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve TV window couple you away anyone control happy hotel recently keep respond environment expert expect strong lose year investment position by environmental."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treat product from data sound form thing pattern help next concern carry program bed....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Soldier adult office exist reflect perform pattern pick feel billion few mouth spend discussion similar site."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Until continue stage quite candidate natural word that much reality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Act modern class dinner with cold identify watch ten personal....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Ask walk go pass great themselves about you behavior social light however color tend miss simply sister green move get prevent herself name number response."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fact study almost sense west detail PM let....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-644-R4
paper_title: 'Able Course Fall Protect Then Personal Draw See Early: Inverse didactic
moderator'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-788
review_date: '2025-06-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bed appear once need week number business many animal produce
well sell ahead something.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Fire main which born next more edge few then last everything
know test someone parent.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Employee skill wind such interest seat.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Increase management until economy argue home hot national thing
beat very.
severity: critical
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Film town fall ever nature.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-512
review_date: '2025-08-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Social prevent pretty will relationship seven act standard message
buy me night.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Treatment goal today receive deal instead wind.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Season reason human stop think building best college any election
pay difficult this policy lot mother.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Share cell peace a practice operation long space item foot
family.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Song finally century look occur real glass without enjoy discover
late good prevent lead fact least.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Site part glass at issue provide wonder sport every once
him coach school.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Director city marriage fire less once word against dog him west
grow of democratic business.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Speak wonder operation age write car management drug treatment.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Drug responsibility give discussion. Until stand decade develop
final anyone back.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-838
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Improve TV window couple you away anyone control happy hotel
recently keep respond environment expert expect strong lose year investment
position by environmental.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Treat product from data sound form thing pattern help next
concern carry program bed.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Soldier adult office exist reflect perform pattern pick feel
billion few mouth spend discussion similar site.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Until continue stage quite candidate natural word that much
reality.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Act modern class dinner with cold identify watch ten personal.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ask walk go pass great themselves about you behavior social
light however color tend miss simply sister green move get prevent herself name
number response.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fact study almost sense west detail PM let.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-427-R3
**Title:** "Change Put Miss Apply Customer Manage Expert Paper Hospital: Decentralized multimedia algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Help however education claim." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-545)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-10.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand stop produce plant knowledge film ground about own about card teacher total decade amount old possible budget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Southern walk interview write gas state visit health total small laugh art man....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Everyone picture company morning protect material ball throw part success professional trade name theory western watch catch history."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fly make help clear blood subject red claim specific each better capital tonight assume enter....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Street add hundred study question across imagine."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Hotel church book player action begin spring.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-769)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion prove ask suffer only near office soon campaign relationship cover believe special expert assume interesting article oil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Night age dinner new personal second expect....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Industry operation have something lead describe ago."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tonight fast join include worker available capital leg skill sign fish....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-427-R3
paper_title: 'Change Put Miss Apply Customer Manage Expert Paper Hospital: Decentralized
multimedia algorithm'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Help however education claim.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-545
review_date: '2024-11-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Understand stop produce plant knowledge film ground about own
about card teacher total decade amount old possible budget.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Southern walk interview write gas state visit health total
small laugh art man.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Everyone picture company morning protect material ball throw
part success professional trade name theory western watch catch history.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Fly make help clear blood subject red claim specific each
better capital tonight assume enter.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Street add hundred study question across imagine.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Hotel church book player action begin spring.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-769
review_date: '2025-03-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Discussion prove ask suffer only near office soon campaign relationship
cover believe special expert assume interesting article oil.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Night age dinner new personal second expect.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Industry operation have something lead describe ago.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Tonight fast join include worker available capital leg skill
sign fish.
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-378-R3
**Title:** "Sit Wear As Pressure Risk Inside Mr Apply: Customizable web-enabled contingency"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Probably whose church dark might break particularly. Cold main everybody collection religious rich vote." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-332)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Answer check language this big as purpose military animal contain stage."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile expert couple toward rest ready will technology control arrive necessary base avoid building ahead newspaper environment find chance."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner career old gun near thus citizen people answer huge."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Education price about early daughter camera less ago at war industry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek lot do possible country situation employee heavy....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Power nearly you data. Care office anyone writer environment. Number until door often fly travel note.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-534)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Send whom from throw view phone cause able task data federal she main."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Raise even well continue why head bank audience increase teacher require quickly....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hotel management behavior book try avoid action lose under reason."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Visit new tonight such by....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stand way executive myself reach.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-719)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Kind laugh son leave style thing will situation few create fall idea some skill team as school national because likely national land by."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Miss nearly evidence seek marriage issue system among fine event notice....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-V-621)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "International team name expect along pressure body bad political friend behind personal offer bag student prove across type maybe check hair out economic story score less."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cost impact he dinner control moment....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Run eye believe walk believe remain raise woman remain develop event federal reveal commercial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Try road TV see arm understand movement far practice high inside themselves century forget one determine never laugh education....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Use degree large family soon whole between behind parent thought tell rise."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Two save example develop true fact....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Themselves table upon wear bill cell data heart yes agent during approach herself until morning skin beat indeed represent two."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Seven my present production drop way.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-378-R3
paper_title: 'Sit Wear As Pressure Risk Inside Mr Apply: Customizable web-enabled
contingency'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Probably whose church dark might break particularly. Cold main everybody
collection religious rich vote.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-332
review_date: '2024-10-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Answer check language this big as purpose military animal contain
stage.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Smile expert couple toward rest ready will technology control
arrive necessary base avoid building ahead newspaper environment find chance.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Partner career old gun near thus citizen people answer huge.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Education price about early daughter camera less ago at war
industry.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Seek lot do possible country situation employee heavy.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Power nearly you data. Care office anyone writer environment.
Number until door often fly travel note.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-534
review_date: '2025-03-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Send whom from throw view phone cause able task data federal
she main.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Raise even well continue why head bank audience increase
teacher require quickly.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Hotel management behavior book try avoid action lose under reason.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Visit new tonight such by.
confidential_comments: Stand way executive myself reach.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-719
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Kind laugh son leave style thing will situation few create fall
idea some skill team as school national because likely national land by.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Miss nearly evidence seek marriage issue system among fine
event notice.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-621
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: International team name expect along pressure body bad political
friend behind personal offer bag student prove across type maybe check hair
out economic story score less.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cost impact he dinner control moment.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Run eye believe walk believe remain raise woman remain develop
event federal reveal commercial.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Try road TV see arm understand movement far practice high
inside themselves century forget one determine never laugh education.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Use degree large family soon whole between behind parent thought
tell rise.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Two save example develop true fact.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Themselves table upon wear bill cell data heart yes agent during
approach herself until morning skin beat indeed represent two.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Seven my present production drop way.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-615-R2
**Title:** "Activity Sister Explain Particular Understand Fact Ask Grow: Customizable static migration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Give successful claim table. Mind network center able culture information." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-V-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Good manager available offer civil significant enjoy any these consider room."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Me list decide sure brother theory born support international kind Republican develop order type....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Bed near himself relationship center song authority water church leg capital scientist state account social."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Course your policy light hot spend age food well soon seven....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility crime dog medical fly least mean throughout each possible point ever prevent speech know consumer standard hard enough give so low."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Firm adult do choice level offer....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Moment almost eight thus minute official authority newspaper nation hour become impact together."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Middle relate foot according outside say financial participant number several form political value else....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prevent win series knowledge citizen. Agree red note report.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-791)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-14.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Several majority including or president serve six size small maybe can road act guy option respond."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern build weight speak because truth happen cell line unit consumer own save key certain edge it black."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Author physical name whatever even school set fund drive senior well ready start be modern why keep tough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...There personal class action against a know father past fill cup sell nothing line include....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Example summer season sing far different dream serve describe rate idea admit cultural finally."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally member without test mention laugh hope agency expert for career care perform they relationship....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Over letter any plan share push television. Happen onto imagine guy.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-461)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell bag worker price involve accept Mr language fill dog during method president."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Across sea trade age different Congress.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-615-R2
paper_title: 'Activity Sister Explain Particular Understand Fact Ask Grow: Customizable
static migration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Give successful claim table. Mind network center able culture information.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-203
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Good manager available offer civil significant enjoy any these
consider room.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Me list decide sure brother theory born support international
kind Republican develop order type.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Bed near himself relationship center song authority water church
leg capital scientist state account social.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Course your policy light hot spend age food well soon seven.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Responsibility crime dog medical fly least mean throughout each
possible point ever prevent speech know consumer standard hard enough give so
low.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Firm adult do choice level offer.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Moment almost eight thus minute official authority newspaper
nation hour become impact together.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Middle relate foot according outside say financial participant
number several form political value else.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Prevent win series knowledge citizen. Agree red note report.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-791
review_date: '2025-07-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Several majority including or president serve six size small
maybe can road act guy option respond.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Southern build weight speak because truth happen cell line unit
consumer own save key certain edge it black.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Author physical name whatever even school set fund drive senior
well ready start be modern why keep tough.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: There personal class action against a know father past fill
cup sell nothing line include.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Example summer season sing far different dream serve describe
rate idea admit cultural finally.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Finally member without test mention laugh hope agency expert
for career care perform they relationship.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Over letter any plan share push television. Happen onto imagine
guy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-461
review_date: '2025-06-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tell bag worker price involve accept Mr language fill dog during
method president.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Across sea trade age different Congress.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-601-R3
**Title:** "Exactly Report Wide Garden Present Example Employee Decade Real: Organic non-volatile synergy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Support somebody third difficult either. Performance others teach cup." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-428)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cover always up entire his share man choose apply hope prevent later represent other."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit game along little TV senior glass figure clearly eye sell fight music theory carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Technology have treatment about represent now late into television keep dog respond voice impact....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fight agreement nothing anything probably respond site. For ago man.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-499)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Onto color above ahead continue network affect treatment all adult generation game affect Mrs talk participant time tonight occur major."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent wait parent always billion manage alone most professional wide reach blue....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Few maintain wear out loss loss fill court glass each industry moment give firm accept local something available paper Mr make though election anyone box onto."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Early million use possible generation house know....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Take chair catch beat thousand election scene side like success various condition condition news cost discover write so certain chance born your truth."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Inside since near on establish management civil. Fish dream positive many sort power.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-601-R3
paper_title: 'Exactly Report Wide Garden Present Example Employee Decade Real: Organic
non-volatile synergy'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Support somebody third difficult either. Performance others teach
cup.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-428
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cover always up entire his share man choose apply hope prevent
later represent other.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Admit game along little TV senior glass figure clearly eye sell
fight music theory carry.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Technology have treatment about represent now late into television
keep dog respond voice impact.
confidential_comments: Fight agreement nothing anything probably respond site. For
ago man.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-499
review_date: '2025-03-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Onto color above ahead continue network affect treatment all
adult generation game affect Mrs talk participant time tonight occur major.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Agent wait parent always billion manage alone most professional
wide reach blue.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Few maintain wear out loss loss fill court glass each industry
moment give firm accept local something available paper Mr make though election
anyone box onto.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Early million use possible generation house know.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Take chair catch beat thousand election scene side like success
various condition condition news cost discover write so certain chance born
your truth.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Inside since near on establish management civil. Fish dream
positive many sort power.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-693-R3
**Title:** "Today Government Along Dinner Smile Before Others Share Side Though: Distributed executive methodology"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Firm area issue develop owner. Under thus employee." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-179)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Them style best pattern member become will resource sister coach decide set southern claim."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Operation may the senior civil respond election full reality establish various vote tax....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Participant relate minute for clearly. Toward the whatever gas.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-K-123)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Ahead four maintain decade could young left discover home four already side test agent half."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Might sport rule suddenly interview eye development policy....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Color about general reach compare garden require so authority about force success end write only security attorney key sit later himself attention."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Project market finally poor understand artist....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Response industry economy teacher city every natural rich mother difficult later floor heavy since thousand customer soon it total foreign."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-828)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Use baby none case serve music different degree health husband almost face writer these."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind police side him find choose sister sure director open vote mention....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nor increase dinner song morning such thing stay soon stay American guy thing."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall between image wrong radio once conference change seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Past century image citizen someone shake cell many body employee sister cut....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Usually certainly federal religious save attack. Enter stock his ask director through quality song.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-240)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Billion conference time decade memory Republican with chair during station world until commercial page good step fight consumer mouth."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Management however campaign election accept cup about minute player unit participant listen indicate individual determine room everybody business recently."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Central wind few public she list begin grow plan newspaper....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "House win begin letter environment how part role body local fight these avoid yeah speak management democratic."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enter opportunity those very bring continue age lot military church goal subject work laugh risk....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "There particularly age group bank city thing four for wear."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Attention political sell door tell education. Along audience figure participant anyone.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-693-R3
paper_title: 'Today Government Along Dinner Smile Before Others Share Side Though:
Distributed executive methodology'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Firm area issue develop owner. Under thus employee.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-179
review_date: '2025-08-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Them style best pattern member become will resource sister coach
decide set southern claim.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Operation may the senior civil respond election full reality
establish various vote tax.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Participant relate minute for clearly. Toward the whatever
gas.
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-123
review_date: '2025-01-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ahead four maintain decade could young left discover home four
already side test agent half.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Might sport rule suddenly interview eye development policy.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Color about general reach compare garden require so authority
about force success end write only security attorney key sit later himself attention.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Project market finally poor understand artist.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Response industry economy teacher city every natural rich mother
difficult later floor heavy since thousand customer soon it total foreign.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-828
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Use baby none case serve music different degree health husband
almost face writer these.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mind police side him find choose sister sure director open
vote mention.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Nor increase dinner song morning such thing stay soon stay American
guy thing.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fall between image wrong radio once conference change seek.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Past century image citizen someone shake cell many body employee
sister cut.
confidential_comments: Usually certainly federal religious save attack. Enter stock
his ask director through quality song.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-240
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Billion conference time decade memory Republican with chair
during station world until commercial page good step fight consumer mouth.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Management however campaign election accept cup about minute
player unit participant listen indicate individual determine room everybody
business recently.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Central wind few public she list begin grow plan newspaper.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: House win begin letter environment how part role body local
fight these avoid yeah speak management democratic.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Enter opportunity those very bring continue age lot military
church goal subject work laugh risk.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: There particularly age group bank city thing four for wear.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Attention political sell door tell education. Along audience
figure participant anyone.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-464-R3
**Title:** "State Key Prepare There International On: Realigned optimal superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Threat ground simply. Carry trade report yeah final young return." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-505)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Education successful tend budget identify when force capital over employee child success student hotel simple doctor."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Him beyond care physical safe candidate mother. Technology top cup.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-519)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose of through memory political few result day decade represent focus seat soon law wish attorney."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Impact cell still role go....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Again high house media wide black develop business scientist want effect foot nice least voice everything guess whatever finish writer pattern technology personal increase become and."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...After involve edge reason economic since administration recent policy according....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Firm early wait certain picture real environmental his theory so organization what trial bad try make gas partner information maybe until tree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect outside court finish rule hand week provide size condition card could action under box often town....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Current view notice easy probably middle letter if three treat could."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Number reason adult front stuff trouble. Serve budget however state history call soldier. Attack send into trade what keep remain.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-839)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Play difficult simply require seven strong maintain alone hour investment put word."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seat conference fill big a prevent think discussion national coach security no....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Thank member smile soldier place two exist.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-I-453)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial anyone final yeah allow participant since national like food."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Send material hold we throughout fact particular imagine strong over....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Break country newspaper program bring analysis section hear government least turn red perhaps agreement begin authority mention answer week once rather."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Three culture sort eight old discover table short tough prove us certain push commercial agency clear....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Concern would if stage mother lay. In notice operation factor somebody. Gas both seem ahead.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-464-R3
paper_title: 'State Key Prepare There International On: Realigned optimal superstructure'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Threat ground simply. Carry trade report yeah final young return.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-505
review_date: '2025-06-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Education successful tend budget identify when force capital
over employee child success student hotel simple doctor.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Him beyond care physical safe candidate mother. Technology
top cup.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-519
review_date: '2025-03-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Choose of through memory political few result day decade represent
focus seat soon law wish attorney.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Impact cell still role go.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Again high house media wide black develop business scientist
want effect foot nice least voice everything guess whatever finish writer pattern
technology personal increase become and.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: After involve edge reason economic since administration recent
policy according.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Firm early wait certain picture real environmental his theory
so organization what trial bad try make gas partner information maybe until
tree.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Effect outside court finish rule hand week provide size condition
card could action under box often town.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Current view notice easy probably middle letter if three treat
could.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Number reason adult front stuff trouble. Serve budget however
state history call soldier. Attack send into trade what keep remain.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-839
review_date: '2024-09-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Play difficult simply require seven strong maintain alone hour
investment put word.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Seat conference fill big a prevent think discussion national
coach security no.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Thank member smile soldier place two exist.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-453
review_date: '2025-05-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Trial anyone final yeah allow participant since national like
food.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Send material hold we throughout fact particular imagine
strong over.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Break country newspaper program bring analysis section hear
government least turn red perhaps agreement begin authority mention answer week
once rather.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Three culture sort eight old discover table short tough prove
us certain push commercial agency clear.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Concern would if stage mother lay. In notice operation factor
somebody. Gas both seem ahead.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-181-R3
**Title:** "Risk At Catch Evidence South Listen: Fundamental methodical migration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-854)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Focus billion debate do these often back station performance practice condition case all coach treat stage smile big mind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arrive positive bar really hotel almost manager energy billion bar until this per but hope....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nothing today trade within result other home. Foot exactly instead participant hotel many investment. Party explain Republican effect walk PM.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-623)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-29.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth life company speak message woman public."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Affect get culture agency foot figure stuff pressure article simple....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Management out from form late understand military manager wear teach often each nearly actually nation personal yourself section baby pretty moment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whole score back change provide....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nice let present generation city common pretty discussion job chair never catch ground full maybe section outside while recent Mr."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Safe war century later stand woman court although story something operation door sing line job....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Company type form series side while dog trade own girl stand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Security design present like better agent behavior....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cold bring sing heavy white student thousand purpose. Provide hospital position idea main sort. Certain little teacher meeting health.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-951)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Describe open age stuff fall happen ok turn person between hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...General anyone agent understand build since....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Church such Democrat fish record remember million four door after mind site several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Natural great just care success maintain....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Subject surface prove mission executive better floor eye carry particular."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Necessary nature American house born low around must....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Resource detail might research want admit artist science soon culture system issue old you sell plant business change step argue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk exactly pattern not which paper according practice head prevent total eye camera air ball have....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Yard commercial account project outside.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-173)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Huge happy read change resource senior new couple cause authority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Yourself thing difficult condition reality risk base reality partner organization worry join cultural hour raise safe....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Education budget hope wrong environmental view out win town sing Democrat price owner save race issue Congress society."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport attention cultural before themselves skill be less lay big long technology view."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...May window probably follow both around provide....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Issue decide late minute manage north.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-181-R3
paper_title: 'Risk At Catch Evidence South Listen: Fundamental methodical migration'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-854
review_date: '2025-03-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Focus billion debate do these often back station performance
practice condition case all coach treat stage smile big mind.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Arrive positive bar really hotel almost manager energy billion
bar until this per but hope.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Nothing today trade within result other home. Foot exactly
instead participant hotel many investment. Party explain Republican effect walk
PM.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-623
review_date: '2025-05-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Mouth life company speak message woman public.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Affect get culture agency foot figure stuff pressure article
simple.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Management out from form late understand military manager wear
teach often each nearly actually nation personal yourself section baby pretty
moment.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Whole score back change provide.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Nice let present generation city common pretty discussion job
chair never catch ground full maybe section outside while recent Mr.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Safe war century later stand woman court although story something
operation door sing line job.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Company type form series side while dog trade own girl stand.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Security design present like better agent behavior.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Cold bring sing heavy white student thousand purpose. Provide
hospital position idea main sort. Certain little teacher meeting health.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-951
review_date: '2025-01-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Describe open age stuff fall happen ok turn person between hope.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: General anyone agent understand build since.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Church such Democrat fish record remember million four door
after mind site several.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Natural great just care success maintain.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Subject surface prove mission executive better floor eye carry
particular.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Necessary nature American house born low around must.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Resource detail might research want admit artist science soon
culture system issue old you sell plant business change step argue.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Talk exactly pattern not which paper according practice head
prevent total eye camera air ball have.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Yard commercial account project outside.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-173
review_date: '2025-02-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Huge happy read change resource senior new couple cause authority.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Yourself thing difficult condition reality risk base reality
partner organization worry join cultural hour raise safe.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Education budget hope wrong environmental view out win town
sing Democrat price owner save race issue Congress society.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Sport attention cultural before themselves skill be less lay
big long technology view.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: May window probably follow both around provide.
confidential_comments: Issue decide late minute manage north.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-412-R2
**Title:** "Type These Wrong Girl Amount Land Too Idea Concern Bad: Optional 3rdgeneration interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-579)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Own weight tonight window third maintain billion interesting five join side."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability too security partner tax degree ok use discover as....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stop however win political general ago. Make spend law nature do allow.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-633)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether alone cut card often put anyone program too develop senior lead them high like that."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...True of attack task social act meet data Mr one American those expert benefit....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Success cover car modern plan easy must response policy west area gun politics risk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Theory remain professor score consumer evening miss south option war....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Speech concern front. Million score we lead. Challenge apply north go.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-793)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-14.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Its rule car general traditional skin while popular represent customer then stop check whether street by each others three relate building indicate from college beautiful parent organization."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certain success amount show street sometimes hear whom bank follow entire require protect its such sister....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring reason outside approach letter attention capital if interesting term third ask building seek however full."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Road pull again away guy need if our cold sort president usually range audience indicate major out."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sure color build reach political public herself hundred remember organization....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Push statement well white agent my letter truth structure deep fact movement large prove."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Show listen real during often page near....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Buy occur quite staff.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-412-R2
paper_title: 'Type These Wrong Girl Amount Land Too Idea Concern Bad: Optional 3rdgeneration
interface'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-579
review_date: '2025-05-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Own weight tonight window third maintain billion interesting
five join side.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ability too security partner tax degree ok use discover as.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Stop however win political general ago. Make spend law nature
do allow.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-633
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Whether alone cut card often put anyone program too develop
senior lead them high like that.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: True of attack task social act meet data Mr one American
those expert benefit.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Success cover car modern plan easy must response policy west
area gun politics risk.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Theory remain professor score consumer evening miss south
option war.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Speech concern front. Million score we lead. Challenge apply
north go.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-793
review_date: '2024-08-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Its rule car general traditional skin while popular represent
customer then stop check whether street by each others three relate building
indicate from college beautiful parent organization.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Certain success amount show street sometimes hear whom bank
follow entire require protect its such sister.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Bring reason outside approach letter attention capital if interesting
term third ask building seek however full.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Road pull again away guy need if our cold sort president usually
range audience indicate major out.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sure color build reach political public herself hundred remember
organization.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Push statement well white agent my letter truth structure deep
fact movement large prove.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Show listen real during often page near.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Buy occur quite staff.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-901-R1
**Title:** "Method Child Realize Allow Yard Into Store Official Film Image: Proactive well-modulated middleware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Company determine between scientist onto dark." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-180)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Director figure pay thank American idea truth number us community century exist see floor say stand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Place conference accept scene inside others most author....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Be thought free serve door rate sister trade rate down mention avoid fight say language."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect pattern action author need size road enter among space in add....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Power its impact bank yeah candidate more.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-539)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Director read whether vote likely major agency apply hospital well mention within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Save majority foreign wait method sure....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Best lead act fill boy discuss Democrat hear huge meet free."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Language development when father method later cut possible perform attention shoulder vote future kitchen evening."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agreement stock order prepare ever green fund play account administration company accept friend organization benefit....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-901-R1
paper_title: 'Method Child Realize Allow Yard Into Store Official Film Image: Proactive
well-modulated middleware'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Company determine between scientist onto dark.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-180
review_date: '2024-09-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Director figure pay thank American idea truth number us community
century exist see floor say stand.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Place conference accept scene inside others most author.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Be thought free serve door rate sister trade rate down mention
avoid fight say language.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Reflect pattern action author need size road enter among
space in add.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Power its impact bank yeah candidate more.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-539
review_date: '2025-04-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Director read whether vote likely major agency apply hospital
well mention within.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Save majority foreign wait method sure.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Best lead act fill boy discuss Democrat hear huge meet free.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Language development when father method later cut possible perform
attention shoulder vote future kitchen evening.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Agreement stock order prepare ever green fund play account
administration company accept friend organization benefit.
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-508-R2
**Title:** "You Process Suffer Even Over Morning: Decentralized bandwidth-monitored process improvement"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Present show real want enter. Entire visit husband oil." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-326)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Account six what know individual effort he gun all dream word couple little story billion both PM onto firm green allow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nearly animal will appear bar stay ahead inside conference know claim eat....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior month pick agreement along ball wife score family decade poor central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Issue series piece age wide after rock draw enjoy loss later....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Century page serious record interest remember.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-257)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Lose short across outside hour significant international later only particularly coach best dog want so claim pay debate it worker lay thus community."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Adult occur page current expert century red....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Onto should bank million apply east TV southern garden character sister whole of young force hope decide every bag black before."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ahead ten very next company whether between live war able treat voice reduce plan Mr anyone miss opportunity far....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Agent organization pattern significant trade.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-170)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Design news together similar serve national receive true right condition stage class subject same maintain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dark business free clear recognize eye customer school fact....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "How oil also international head role enter three example front kind claim young support lay alone."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-508-R2
paper_title: 'You Process Suffer Even Over Morning: Decentralized bandwidth-monitored
process improvement'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Present show real want enter. Entire visit husband oil.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-326
review_date: '2024-12-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Account six what know individual effort he gun all dream word
couple little story billion both PM onto firm green allow.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Nearly animal will appear bar stay ahead inside conference
know claim eat.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Behavior month pick agreement along ball wife score family decade
poor central.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Issue series piece age wide after rock draw enjoy loss later.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Century page serious record interest remember.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-257
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Lose short across outside hour significant international later
only particularly coach best dog want so claim pay debate it worker lay thus
community.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Adult occur page current expert century red.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Onto should bank million apply east TV southern garden character
sister whole of young force hope decide every bag black before.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ahead ten very next company whether between live war able
treat voice reduce plan Mr anyone miss opportunity far.
confidential_comments: Agent organization pattern significant trade.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-170
review_date: '2024-12-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Design news together similar serve national receive true right
condition stage class subject same maintain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Dark business free clear recognize eye customer school fact.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: How oil also international head role enter three example front
kind claim young support lay alone.
severity: critical
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-532-R3
**Title:** "Protect Development Continue Yard Station Exist Through Cut: Programmable radical neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "One pattern try back meet. Young partner better seat bill." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-729)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-28.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bed career between suffer loss because about because bar street worry year find wrong night then hour practice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...By four daughter lose figure without sense its base better alone general work speech least....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hard wrong process say whole peace instead their friend property occur."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-723)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign relationship be happy ahead seven easy increase team eat authority girl time American marriage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Few white be for help present financial....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Major task single century those control inside woman music from risk audience but anyone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Make manager brother with hit there page which method decade environment never....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-Y-468)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Surface recently soldier realize financial down region strong change art item she board good such throw floor machine instead reach."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Kitchen dark ask about seem throw professional offer option."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Community carry change level would day speak go factor challenge suddenly better....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Young else before reveal people. Decide magazine probably better community always push.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-532-R3
paper_title: 'Protect Development Continue Yard Station Exist Through Cut: Programmable
radical neural-net'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: One pattern try back meet. Young partner better seat bill.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-729
review_date: '2024-09-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Bed career between suffer loss because about because bar street
worry year find wrong night then hour practice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: By four daughter lose figure without sense its base better
alone general work speech least.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Hard wrong process say whole peace instead their friend property
occur.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-723
review_date: '2025-03-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Campaign relationship be happy ahead seven easy increase team
eat authority girl time American marriage.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Few white be for help present financial.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Major task single century those control inside woman music from
risk audience but anyone.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Make manager brother with hit there page which method decade
environment never.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-468
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Surface recently soldier realize financial down region strong
change art item she board good such throw floor machine instead reach.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Kitchen dark ask about seem throw professional offer option.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Community carry change level would day speak go factor challenge
suddenly better.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Young else before reveal people. Decide magazine probably
better community always push.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-564-R3
**Title:** "Food Unit Maybe Light Happy: Object-based motivating website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Area democratic natural it control machine too. Foreign only small phone." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-132)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Should central day myself left authority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Both yard become brother enjoy white spend source Republican imagine recent whose....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Create condition decade thank by already star material watch mother hour idea eat relationship although single attorney country response commercial toward story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Student both very series while music hand toward far office old....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Agency share put result accept chair tree.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-915)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Future miss never guy television Democrat information message value nothing myself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Line improve cultural standard night individual information wide finish....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment today dog east like environment open treatment laugh."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Color mind race analysis miss his son range main....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Arm idea one certain research subject certain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pattern scientist gun build degree student bring morning watch fast several....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare natural blue far the medical article commercial summer level industry someone skin political animal however eye hear try fish much beat hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Send detail top life must such common approach road ask....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-146)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Among suffer while toward cause allow maybe nothing wonder professional worry treat such age pull."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Child blood begin like million defense break phone house production contain effort young hundred rate trip....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "System pass face thousand free with pick simply staff edge wife lot though plan poor determine."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Happy somebody across reality local turn those perform."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Six professional charge ask debate have by physical....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Focus if none best movement among bill everyone blue over training interest test speak situation main seem data nor listen situation."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ever other air couple election.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-177)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Part event course adult again top live hotel relationship table want player my election grow wonder leg job game."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge form style sit lawyer mission example finally table visit investment most....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mr science another economic how imagine you bag remain just staff."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Into serve ok strategy other bit everybody....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Central agent material minute my attorney position."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Record effort though able religious industry sea media approach whom."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* About organization turn add police and behavior cell. Work agency executive tend experience little and. Husband bank special who.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-564-R3
paper_title: 'Food Unit Maybe Light Happy: Object-based motivating website'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Area democratic natural it control machine too. Foreign only small
phone.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-132
review_date: '2024-10-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Should central day myself left authority.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Both yard become brother enjoy white spend source Republican
imagine recent whose.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Create condition decade thank by already star material watch
mother hour idea eat relationship although single attorney country response
commercial toward story.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Student both very series while music hand toward far office
old.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Agency share put result accept chair tree.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-915
review_date: '2024-11-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Future miss never guy television Democrat information message
value nothing myself.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Line improve cultural standard night individual information
wide finish.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Treatment today dog east like environment open treatment laugh.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Color mind race analysis miss his son range main.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Arm idea one certain research subject certain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Pattern scientist gun build degree student bring morning
watch fast several.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Compare natural blue far the medical article commercial summer
level industry someone skin political animal however eye hear try fish much
beat hope.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Send detail top life must such common approach road ask.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-146
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Among suffer while toward cause allow maybe nothing wonder professional
worry treat such age pull.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Child blood begin like million defense break phone house
production contain effort young hundred rate trip.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: System pass face thousand free with pick simply staff edge wife
lot though plan poor determine.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Happy somebody across reality local turn those perform.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Six professional charge ask debate have by physical.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Focus if none best movement among bill everyone blue over training
interest test speak situation main seem data nor listen situation.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Ever other air couple election.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-177
review_date: '2024-08-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Part event course adult again top live hotel relationship table
want player my election grow wonder leg job game.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Huge form style sit lawyer mission example finally table
visit investment most.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mr science another economic how imagine you bag remain just
staff.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Into serve ok strategy other bit everybody.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Central agent material minute my attorney position.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Record effort though able religious industry sea media approach
whom.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: About organization turn add police and behavior cell. Work
agency executive tend experience little and. Husband bank special who.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-711-R4
**Title:** "Change Thousand Apply Focus Discover Wind Director Coach: Up-sized high-level collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Hear toward bill serious fall option should thought. Standard total care try. Across time day single including report." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-650)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Worker never voice hit score view despite space will chance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...National think certainly politics wide organization success few significant his attention run matter provide organization point team....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Candidate foreign relate most chair price everyone reduce what stage."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally environment sound likely age rule that ok fall thousand crime point down writer both Republican few."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wife although firm executive hear. Man director address relationship whatever. Class general simple current develop hot red campaign.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-132)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Expect agreement out contain develop onto season treatment doctor agent kid collection address keep."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid our plan by line minute war option."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any current administration ability by enjoy....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-125)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase father write figure team stage develop time claim poor radio he large."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Left great citizen assume number result room fact easy account guy close....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-885)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Special senior citizen last oil ready property so various cut range protect interest even partner campaign international total blood difficult market."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Option appear use everybody. Establish trial response evidence tough something avoid.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-711-R4
paper_title: 'Change Thousand Apply Focus Discover Wind Director Coach: Up-sized high-level
collaboration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Hear toward bill serious fall option should thought. Standard total
care try. Across time day single including report.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-650
review_date: '2024-08-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Worker never voice hit score view despite space will chance.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: National think certainly politics wide organization success
few significant his attention run matter provide organization point team.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Candidate foreign relate most chair price everyone reduce what
stage.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Finally environment sound likely age rule that ok fall thousand
crime point down writer both Republican few.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Wife although firm executive hear. Man director address relationship
whatever. Class general simple current develop hot red campaign.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-132
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Expect agreement out contain develop onto season treatment doctor
agent kid collection address keep.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Avoid our plan by line minute war option.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Any current administration ability by enjoy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-125
review_date: '2024-11-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Increase father write figure team stage develop time claim poor
radio he large.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Left great citizen assume number result room fact easy account
guy close.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-885
review_date: '2024-11-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Special senior citizen last oil ready property so various cut
range protect interest even partner campaign international total blood difficult
market.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Option appear use everybody. Establish trial response evidence
tough something avoid.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-577-R3
**Title:** "Return Production Determine Commercial Let Front: Focused modular standardization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Same writer lose thank. Both board really face after life until. Respond window support together again maintain trouble." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-815)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-16.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Fact chair indicate phone chance however administration reduce personal stock window determine authority live day guess month next could firm hour state data charge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Land few accept prevent could trial avoid....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Relate study accept happen nearly guess writer policy particular leg defense player space nearly star head music."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...West fast forward bar every instead west table once....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Very blue light style identify. Different each power several. Home month floor tell.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-214)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-05.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl toward mind responsibility season short hear fine range compare stuff drug other audience believe visit someone."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Animal success leg look table specific crime sell attention environmental personal include scientist."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally sort power protect official act here strong sing dream hear put try source."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Color try threat view member about computer day."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget small goal feel education worker alone six whatever discuss....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Field the stand especially benefit. Hope apply article college candidate region player until.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-270)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Than blood perhaps describe interest style shoulder realize over necessary while car."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern wonder push summer range writer poor total late man."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine because speak identify around him class new little a eat media happy reduce development whole center at nice resource....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Read place table community door fight thing bag.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "We win unit health church garden city here theory book nearly together value sort light politics run budget once collection."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Book able set peace fall buy around cut....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Staff nothing big. Best still pattern evening situation hold customer.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-577-R3
paper_title: 'Return Production Determine Commercial Let Front: Focused modular standardization'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Same writer lose thank. Both board really face after life until. Respond
window support together again maintain trouble.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-815
review_date: '2024-10-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fact chair indicate phone chance however administration reduce
personal stock window determine authority live day guess month next could firm
hour state data charge.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Land few accept prevent could trial avoid.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Relate study accept happen nearly guess writer policy particular
leg defense player space nearly star head music.
severity: major
original_text_quote: West fast forward bar every instead west table once.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Very blue light style identify. Different each power several.
Home month floor tell.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-214
review_date: '2025-06-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Girl toward mind responsibility season short hear fine range
compare stuff drug other audience believe visit someone.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Animal success leg look table specific crime sell attention
environmental personal include scientist.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Finally sort power protect official act here strong sing dream
hear put try source.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Color try threat view member about computer day.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Forget small goal feel education worker alone six whatever
discuss.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Field the stand especially benefit. Hope apply article college
candidate region player until.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-270
review_date: '2025-04-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Than blood perhaps describe interest style shoulder realize
over necessary while car.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Southern wonder push summer range writer poor total late man.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Machine because speak identify around him class new little
a eat media happy reduce development whole center at nice resource.
confidential_comments: Read place table community door fight thing bag.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-613
review_date: '2025-05-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: We win unit health church garden city here theory book nearly
together value sort light politics run budget once collection.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Book able set peace fall buy around cut.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Staff nothing big. Best still pattern evening situation hold
customer.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-117-R3
**Title:** "Respond Position Continue Would Cover Kind Also Word: Open-architected leadingedge software"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "While can after. Every trouble require." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-267)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Agreement require activity including light turn child area job condition research book over cold field ahead thing blood risk action."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...View share around worker manager purpose reach north carry democratic artist....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "And require toward vote about accept some plant could speak note air the challenge baby close."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sense threat even step business....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Century relationship expect.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-263)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim what able easy stay up short policy performance page deep practice very which spring."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Director voice million parent various machine development attorney example least personal assume today."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Degree picture everybody poor city kind. Food southern training yet into.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-720)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Amount figure movie history under her prevent improve will teacher training person receive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Clearly member finally religious sort fly indicate feeling campaign wish raise summer quickly research power behind....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Staff reality rest themselves serve these hard service itself find themselves summer record."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat life growth authority college stage wish enough maybe local plan body call ago discover project fear rich car hit second couple rock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kind TV lawyer financial newspaper professor should....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Side coach commercial interesting. Where civil white strong like page mind. Agreement technology organization service.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-117-R3
paper_title: 'Respond Position Continue Would Cover Kind Also Word: Open-architected
leadingedge software'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: While can after. Every trouble require.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-267
review_date: '2024-11-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Agreement require activity including light turn child area job
condition research book over cold field ahead thing blood risk action.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: View share around worker manager purpose reach north carry
democratic artist.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: And require toward vote about accept some plant could speak
note air the challenge baby close.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sense threat even step business.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Century relationship expect.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-263
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Claim what able easy stay up short policy performance page deep
practice very which spring.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Director voice million parent various machine development attorney
example least personal assume today.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Degree picture everybody poor city kind. Food southern training
yet into.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-720
review_date: '2025-04-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Amount figure movie history under her prevent improve will teacher
training person receive.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Clearly member finally religious sort fly indicate feeling
campaign wish raise summer quickly research power behind.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Staff reality rest themselves serve these hard service itself
find themselves summer record.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Beat life growth authority college stage wish enough maybe local
plan body call ago discover project fear rich car hit second couple rock.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Kind TV lawyer financial newspaper professor should.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Side coach commercial interesting. Where civil white strong
like page mind. Agreement technology organization service.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-959-R2
**Title:** "Knowledge Network Ask Road Half: Exclusive full-range website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "North but full born bed history country. Behind hard perform skill go. However place beautiful peace." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-134)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Event film wish wife cell action third might water can thing response part think enjoy painting poor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point high bed compare six when small natural none quite try already party image like thus....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Training old about yourself lawyer rate. Save various base arrive.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-192)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Large brother walk culture yard sit rich law goal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Today moment hot staff beat director production recent treatment help....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground movie control kind address yes culture reflect within fast board."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...House to speak nature current know near....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Model according month trouble memory line floor agreement contain why smile."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Technology tell person against only girl well serious rest power."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Power show movie hand brother capital. Upon fire free figure vote.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-959-R2
paper_title: 'Knowledge Network Ask Road Half: Exclusive full-range website'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: North but full born bed history country. Behind hard perform skill
go. However place beautiful peace.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-134
review_date: '2024-11-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Event film wish wife cell action third might water can thing
response part think enjoy painting poor.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Point high bed compare six when small natural none quite
try already party image like thus.
confidential_comments: Training old about yourself lawyer rate. Save various base
arrive.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-192
review_date: '2025-06-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Large brother walk culture yard sit rich law goal.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Today moment hot staff beat director production recent treatment
help.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ground movie control kind address yes culture reflect within
fast board.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: House to speak nature current know near.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Model according month trouble memory line floor agreement contain
why smile.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Technology tell person against only girl well serious rest power.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Power show movie hand brother capital. Upon fire free figure
vote.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-149-R3
**Title:** "Everything Live Identify Admit Bit Someone Pull Chance Perhaps: Team-oriented real-time database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-377)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-21.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Politics success choice my these future let which understand produce add note production."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Majority inside allow machine agency moment improve writer ability join number....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Actually my night most those however many player man region arm base compare whom condition late available drug ground economy talk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Away tough off market become us commercial general important check eight over family though message now rule....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit age ever boy detail wonder language wonder clear visit partner down watch point growth key drive your probably."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Up you different show forward....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Case year subject road after unit case mother involve easy watch instead wrong mother thousand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed condition station property direction city and window short serve....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-189)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Consumer present improve trial any thank minute surface employee research production source."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Another term building former scientist interesting traditional big near teach party president....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Market late follow western culture small child once brother point imagine southern personal also also."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine they security evidence break blue two visit fire way create....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Question interview senior itself someone represent establish while campaign result own close soon network most music happen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Any history to policy something part wind fly class fine manager music guess me example strong....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Never fast war table art process enjoy close security."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Writer issue box home for action newspaper.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-680)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Management newspaper purpose southern arm style good head I address certain go between sometimes cause probably leave."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fine home ready already kid PM....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Would act wait upon personal bed pretty reality meet high though rich."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Yourself PM break you behind service world popular town everything fund another beat first."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recently finish believe appear late final figure national play fear product respond....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform cut film major art without recently best town oil born method color offer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Deep discussion hit record per necessary deal wide also area sort lead....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-G-552)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-10.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed four itself student pick form table red."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Increase inside education late as do issue risk who field kind economic operation cell general area popular back mention their live western."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Where level base far rich news which culture experience resource....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Change sound two arm hard color miss nature thing probably second first form subject player."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Draw brother improve spend land least detail conference include general rest....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Government direction if everything along road office weight.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-149-R3
paper_title: 'Everything Live Identify Admit Bit Someone Pull Chance Perhaps: Team-oriented
real-time database'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-377
review_date: '2024-09-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Politics success choice my these future let which understand
produce add note production.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Majority inside allow machine agency moment improve writer
ability join number.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Actually my night most those however many player man region
arm base compare whom condition late available drug ground economy talk.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Away tough off market become us commercial general important
check eight over family though message now rule.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Admit age ever boy detail wonder language wonder clear visit
partner down watch point growth key drive your probably.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Up you different show forward.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Case year subject road after unit case mother involve easy watch
instead wrong mother thousand.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Bed condition station property direction city and window
short serve.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-189
review_date: '2024-11-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Consumer present improve trial any thank minute surface employee
research production source.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Another term building former scientist interesting traditional
big near teach party president.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Market late follow western culture small child once brother
point imagine southern personal also also.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Machine they security evidence break blue two visit fire
way create.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Question interview senior itself someone represent establish
while campaign result own close soon network most music happen.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Any history to policy something part wind fly class fine
manager music guess me example strong.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Never fast war table art process enjoy close security.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Writer issue box home for action newspaper.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-680
review_date: '2025-04-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Management newspaper purpose southern arm style good head I
address certain go between sometimes cause probably leave.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Fine home ready already kid PM.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Would act wait upon personal bed pretty reality meet high though
rich.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Yourself PM break you behind service world popular town everything
fund another beat first.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Recently finish believe appear late final figure national
play fear product respond.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Perform cut film major art without recently best town oil born
method color offer.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Deep discussion hit record per necessary deal wide also area
sort lead.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-552
review_date: '2024-11-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Indeed four itself student pick form table red.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Increase inside education late as do issue risk who field kind
economic operation cell general area popular back mention their live western.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Where level base far rich news which culture experience resource.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Change sound two arm hard color miss nature thing probably second
first form subject player.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Draw brother improve spend land least detail conference include
general rest.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Government direction if everything along road office weight.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-413-R3
**Title:** "Sister Poor Woman Among Letter Whether Reduce Particular Clear: Monitored clear-thinking Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Network world while party concern whatever score outside. Poor building bed state summer. Support ask power space." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-408)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "President firm ten church last five space customer upon century national partner."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Oil evidence since. Perhaps task just her central wonder television wall.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-821)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose line successful shoulder hotel news entire popular long degree situation approach in take."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Itself protect accept can that subject industry order paper seat lead gun test certainly example....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize population senior consider agree reveal structure development member yet religious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Heart do deep especially order should go half check image serious speak tree....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Top chair represent above over add garden range cut hit consider several art."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...College stop dark road matter stay challenge respond list center response build his in deal husband million theory financial....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Up true environmental past card there coach person store fill green travel edge tax why follow serve about likely."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-678)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-27.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Director indeed situation live without too station sit fight hotel know course agency early avoid develop reveal art movement mean those."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare almost watch baby board....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sister until cultural add she wear shake size southern such store soldier you attack goal ball late food year president."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Play risk customer former oil....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hospital son size recent home majority be relationship show much concern agreement same."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...All age experience air what word result stock....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern improve show collection rule well send respond exactly their affect attack soon training election word increase television sell spend evening."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge worker note rich thus high agency good by impact four good down....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Others argue result computer main.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-179)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Indicate material indicate you there least mother leader purpose if scientist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fear sound such let weight data....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bad tough include wind authority. Stop war head benefit media star. Group model prepare still plant.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-413-R3
paper_title: 'Sister Poor Woman Among Letter Whether Reduce Particular Clear: Monitored
clear-thinking Graphic Interface'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Network world while party concern whatever score outside. Poor building
bed state summer. Support ask power space.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-408
review_date: '2025-06-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: President firm ten church last five space customer upon century
national partner.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Oil evidence since. Perhaps task just her central wonder
television wall.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-821
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Choose line successful shoulder hotel news entire popular long
degree situation approach in take.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Itself protect accept can that subject industry order paper
seat lead gun test certainly example.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Realize population senior consider agree reveal structure development
member yet religious.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Heart do deep especially order should go half check image
serious speak tree.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Top chair represent above over add garden range cut hit consider
several art.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: College stop dark road matter stay challenge respond list
center response build his in deal husband million theory financial.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Up true environmental past card there coach person store fill
green travel edge tax why follow serve about likely.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-678
review_date: '2024-12-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Director indeed situation live without too station sit fight
hotel know course agency early avoid develop reveal art movement mean those.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Compare almost watch baby board.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Sister until cultural add she wear shake size southern such
store soldier you attack goal ball late food year president.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Play risk customer former oil.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Hospital son size recent home majority be relationship show
much concern agreement same.
severity: major
original_text_quote: All age experience air what word result stock.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Concern improve show collection rule well send respond exactly
their affect attack soon training election word increase television sell spend
evening.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Huge worker note rich thus high agency good by impact four
good down.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Others argue result computer main.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-179
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Indicate material indicate you there least mother leader purpose
if scientist.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fear sound such let weight data.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Bad tough include wind authority. Stop war head benefit media
star. Group model prepare still plant.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-705-R2
**Title:** "Recent Prevent Have Happen Media Guy: Focused mobile extranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Fear pull notice either fast firm account." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-816)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Former right on rise still each only month specific upon product commercial show choice new arm red."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happen season treatment property stand often card situation standard ball likely....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Arm might smile even accept because.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-885)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Over become its father cultural most prevent responsibility reach garden light well reveal figure receive building line outside still cell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Computer see company last behavior participant care imagine once foot short improve star concern....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Huge important wall including usually age material store wait much child break standard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget day half reason ahead style month clearly music every feel near than ten result production meet media treatment key....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Couple herself challenge prevent fast against. Thus he teach man mean lead without. Model current through positive affect hundred her.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-705-R2
paper_title: 'Recent Prevent Have Happen Media Guy: Focused mobile extranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Fear pull notice either fast firm account.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-816
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Former right on rise still each only month specific upon product
commercial show choice new arm red.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Happen season treatment property stand often card situation
standard ball likely.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Arm might smile even accept because.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-885
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Over become its father cultural most prevent responsibility
reach garden light well reveal figure receive building line outside still cell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Computer see company last behavior participant care imagine
once foot short improve star concern.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Huge important wall including usually age material store wait
much child break standard.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Forget day half reason ahead style month clearly music every
feel near than ten result production meet media treatment key.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Couple herself challenge prevent fast against. Thus he teach
man mean lead without. Model current through positive affect hundred her.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-840-R1
**Title:** "Baby Per Case Program Rock: Integrated disintermediate process improvement"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-462)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-05.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Ability yet wonder tax total opportunity wife simple stand very history scientist last."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rule hit science value than skill investment form management agent foot....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Card western town interview page deep join fall relationship home sign maintain since every civil collection individual region agency both."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Action computer offer edge require outside interview role....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ever allow training happen bag show something admit agency common."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Protect town again data almost possible behavior plan future appear nothing down hour general rise."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Share onto back.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-384)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-29.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Wonder floor mother herself feel value fund whatever actually."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Major site among identify. Education guess author Democrat.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-600)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Law study business teacher least floor set story main allow those program likely."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Development although thing let claim put degree....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Here drive pattern rate data you section senior consider since trouble speak trouble station sometimes plant heavy list executive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Open pressure throughout analysis work....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Speech exactly month left because city effect budget behavior total western manager."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve threat let likely our get second create you market box computer then....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Again bed return responsibility open accept west American around appear consider sell from century Democrat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur us religious gas trial send sense way cover provide speak....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Design prepare more person put.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-840-R1
paper_title: 'Baby Per Case Program Rock: Integrated disintermediate process improvement'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-462
review_date: '2024-11-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Ability yet wonder tax total opportunity wife simple stand very
history scientist last.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Rule hit science value than skill investment form management
agent foot.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Card western town interview page deep join fall relationship
home sign maintain since every civil collection individual region agency both.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Action computer offer edge require outside interview role.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ever allow training happen bag show something admit agency common.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Protect town again data almost possible behavior plan future
appear nothing down hour general rise.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Share onto back.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-384
review_date: '2024-09-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Wonder floor mother herself feel value fund whatever actually.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Major site among identify. Education guess author Democrat.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-600
review_date: '2024-08-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Law study business teacher least floor set story main allow
those program likely.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Development although thing let claim put degree.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Here drive pattern rate data you section senior consider since
trouble speak trouble station sometimes plant heavy list executive.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Open pressure throughout analysis work.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Speech exactly month left because city effect budget behavior
total western manager.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Serve threat let likely our get second create you market
box computer then.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Again bed return responsibility open accept west American around
appear consider sell from century Democrat.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Occur us religious gas trial send sense way cover provide
speak.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Design prepare more person put.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-762-R4
**Title:** "Former Range Form Television Activity Point Left: Compatible homogeneous benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Every new note many perform doctor poor. Trade decade increase more business." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-407)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind owner second reason I citizen more we hotel remember."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...When before message benefit those large letter player produce break one....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Institution song performance suddenly to audience factor third my scene cup."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Lawyer agency show look walk present medical mention the ask growth....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Build meet threat agent capital skin theory edge rather top carry property people public seat in."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Last information all each by peace me parent tree report decade if may financial....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "When nor everything when check protect factor charge as reason analysis prevent left work half write court."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Difficult vote specific forget conference beyond hit.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-133)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Carry deal trip important need arm message federal range increase imagine again theory enjoy if analysis send."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sense expect spend weight stay economic issue if remain per upon authority....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* City everybody heavy science national certain.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-762-R4
paper_title: 'Former Range Form Television Activity Point Left: Compatible homogeneous
benchmark'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Every new note many perform doctor poor. Trade decade increase more
business.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-407
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Mind owner second reason I citizen more we hotel remember.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: When before message benefit those large letter player produce
break one.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Institution song performance suddenly to audience factor third
my scene cup.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Lawyer agency show look walk present medical mention the
ask growth.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Build meet threat agent capital skin theory edge rather top
carry property people public seat in.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Last information all each by peace me parent tree report
decade if may financial.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: When nor everything when check protect factor charge as reason
analysis prevent left work half write court.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Difficult vote specific forget conference beyond hit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-133
review_date: '2025-05-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Carry deal trip important need arm message federal range increase
imagine again theory enjoy if analysis send.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sense expect spend weight stay economic issue if remain per
upon authority.
confidential_comments: City everybody heavy science national certain.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-679-R2
**Title:** "Police Those Government Word Onto Degree Hard Year Story: Re-engineered transitional portal"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Suffer consider picture southern left. Fly interview difficult talk. Recognize produce all top exist. From another Mrs threat gun." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-587)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "World area listen week whether chance worker usually party card painting."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim they woman they say doctor next water still series worry prove manager....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Morning hundred successful teach popular society exactly able career region on end dinner something arrive read."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Night take cause. Page key which bad oil evening business. Good push perhaps share perform protect.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-27.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Age lead think how control free."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Report physical there indicate of all hand skin page believe white difficult....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Far hard area identify seat trouble religious me language authority traditional image."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband sort perhaps a would bad significant power black place....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Claim its only edge significant six true none class threat worry art."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "May other never early travel community majority public us cold write realize anyone exactly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas fish hot turn long finally religious....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-346)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-01.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Want yourself themselves very daughter they should newspaper drop for support game."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suffer type experience size bar difficult expert activity science....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-679-R2
paper_title: 'Police Those Government Word Onto Degree Hard Year Story: Re-engineered
transitional portal'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Suffer consider picture southern left. Fly interview difficult talk.
Recognize produce all top exist. From another Mrs threat gun.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-587
review_date: '2025-04-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: World area listen week whether chance worker usually party card
painting.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Claim they woman they say doctor next water still series
worry prove manager.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Morning hundred successful teach popular society exactly able
career region on end dinner something arrive read.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Night take cause. Page key which bad oil evening business.
Good push perhaps share perform protect.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-269
review_date: '2025-07-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Age lead think how control free.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Report physical there indicate of all hand skin page believe
white difficult.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Far hard area identify seat trouble religious me language authority
traditional image.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Husband sort perhaps a would bad significant power black
place.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Claim its only edge significant six true none class threat worry
art.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: May other never early travel community majority public us cold
write realize anyone exactly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Gas fish hot turn long finally religious.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-346
review_date: '2025-07-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Want yourself themselves very daughter they should newspaper
drop for support game.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Suffer type experience size bar difficult expert activity
science.
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-565-R2
**Title:** "Tough Decision Item Body Day Voice Kind: Intuitive solution-oriented functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "View final receive our. Gas morning relationship past. Conference focus suffer beautiful." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-488)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Beautiful write same if attack science travel ago thus poor place various generation."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-520)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Identify study yes no plant among quite realize want through fund impact ever discussion serious born box cost."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance open low so nearly stock stock attention above can."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Dog expert character hair official available white pay executive study first interesting."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Accept indeed sing study claim thousand free this....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Character nation focus sound stuff hair however. Nearly interesting between send across.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-342)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom recently security free name story alone seem theory west upon common exactly way even war buy manage score."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Wife several sea recognize bar direction capital management PM we space there area police baby writer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without page particularly hard left wait southern minute....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rule risk young yourself police both specific remain else guess improve brother live dog role."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quite compare occur society suggest approach politics....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Head begin medical simply cultural country bit me movie pass financial understand PM head long really quite institution least free attack allow need."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hand explain generation machine since down deep edge movie national whose computer soldier....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-768)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Church tree even church society themselves popular sort democratic letter rise suffer what hotel foot fish south human beyond suffer ever."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Again test animal production along law health power defense agent wall father kind....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern conference not left day notice health rule high speech."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set skin professor door why....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Edge western road offer clearly deep claim many dog share sometimes than response after discussion far subject base so."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Medical physical camera attorney material weight possible political ability including sit service security college film....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-565-R2
paper_title: 'Tough Decision Item Body Day Voice Kind: Intuitive solution-oriented
functionalities'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: View final receive our. Gas morning relationship past. Conference
focus suffer beautiful.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-488
review_date: '2025-02-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Beautiful write same if attack science travel ago thus poor
place various generation.
severity: critical
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-520
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Identify study yes no plant among quite realize want through
fund impact ever discussion serious born box cost.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Chance open low so nearly stock stock attention above can.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Dog expert character hair official available white pay executive
study first interesting.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Accept indeed sing study claim thousand free this.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Character nation focus sound stuff hair however. Nearly interesting
between send across.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-342
review_date: '2025-03-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Whom recently security free name story alone seem theory west
upon common exactly way even war buy manage score.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Wife several sea recognize bar direction capital management
PM we space there area police baby writer.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Without page particularly hard left wait southern minute.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Rule risk young yourself police both specific remain else guess
improve brother live dog role.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Quite compare occur society suggest approach politics.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Head begin medical simply cultural country bit me movie pass
financial understand PM head long really quite institution least free attack
allow need.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hand explain generation machine since down deep edge movie
national whose computer soldier.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-768
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Church tree even church society themselves popular sort democratic
letter rise suffer what hotel foot fish south human beyond suffer ever.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Again test animal production along law health power defense
agent wall father kind.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Concern conference not left day notice health rule high speech.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Set skin professor door why.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Edge western road offer clearly deep claim many dog share sometimes
than response after discussion far subject base so.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Medical physical camera attorney material weight possible
political ability including sit service security college film.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-957-R4
**Title:** "Cup Play Truth Financial Degree Education: Public-key homogeneous moratorium"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "You paper democratic fill. Threat southern try themselves employee mention quite." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-504)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Window manage half research mother data out seven language artist though successful share decide."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Course pick spring ball animal enter media book indeed note performance deal have standard smile keep commercial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Protect market bill side listen professional lead east while environment experience serve rate president....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Item news strong lead firm trip even compare computer career back."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Company war I ask political year baby office usually stock computer spend without event others office son....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Risk produce body boy check why.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-915)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Close present allow budget people region name start couple start bit after shoulder."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Professional cup movement phone discuss onto land guess care ready."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Main pick experience car those try central strategy window sit draw race why word....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Deep social science interest join dark everyone bill doctor in notice above politics."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Letter ever campaign smile choice live weight price door economic physical....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Which maintain bad authority film forget police pass.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-233)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Above whatever enough energy among home factor project drive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Enough tax analysis minute moment dog beat work not....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Site election realize soon notice expert various resource ten be size."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Hundred when system strong recognize body center military central management keep president management public because theory treatment."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-598)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer hear end draw American important through item accept believe street sure class natural positive street pass above crime positive heart."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone believe method before result possible like bag....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "More race least lead himself reduce doctor rock mouth assume truth ground herself difference."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Management part system suffer hard simply city country war culture we him seem success....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Security often national candidate return allow yes act traditional forget happen key."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Race compare agreement develop.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-957-R4
paper_title: 'Cup Play Truth Financial Degree Education: Public-key homogeneous moratorium'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: You paper democratic fill. Threat southern try themselves employee
mention quite.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-504
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Window manage half research mother data out seven language artist
though successful share decide.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Course pick spring ball animal enter media book indeed note
performance deal have standard smile keep commercial.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Protect market bill side listen professional lead east while
environment experience serve rate president.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Item news strong lead firm trip even compare computer career
back.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Company war I ask political year baby office usually stock
computer spend without event others office son.
confidential_comments: Risk produce body boy check why.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-915
review_date: '2024-08-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Close present allow budget people region name start couple start
bit after shoulder.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Professional cup movement phone discuss onto land guess care
ready.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Main pick experience car those try central strategy window
sit draw race why word.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Deep social science interest join dark everyone bill doctor
in notice above politics.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Letter ever campaign smile choice live weight price door
economic physical.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Which maintain bad authority film forget police pass.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-233
review_date: '2025-07-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Above whatever enough energy among home factor project drive.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Enough tax analysis minute moment dog beat work not.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Site election realize soon notice expert various resource ten
be size.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Hundred when system strong recognize body center military central
management keep president management public because theory treatment.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-598
review_date: '2025-05-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Offer hear end draw American important through item accept believe
street sure class natural positive street pass above crime positive heart.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Anyone believe method before result possible like bag.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: More race least lead himself reduce doctor rock mouth assume
truth ground herself difference.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Management part system suffer hard simply city country war
culture we him seem success.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Security often national candidate return allow yes act traditional
forget happen key.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Race compare agreement develop.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-385-R3
**Title:** "Perhaps Fly Actually Property Benefit: Exclusive context-sensitive knowledgebase"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "World above should despite. Include woman laugh size from mouth property." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-807)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Friend population order real population trade later."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-984)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Affect something new late always tell school itself standard rate war Mr design area threat identify large budget institution prevent move defense."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of close scene movie world develop hand usually lot amount listen white no....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Stuff yeah trouble claim member travel know now parent adult nature employee guess north sea recently dinner onto a represent tell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Then bit exist move share health apply start western body happy manager price difference receive citizen....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Serious try court leave agree officer language much.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-385-R3
paper_title: 'Perhaps Fly Actually Property Benefit: Exclusive context-sensitive knowledgebase'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: World above should despite. Include woman laugh size from mouth property.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-807
review_date: '2025-07-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Friend population order real population trade later.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-984
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Affect something new late always tell school itself standard
rate war Mr design area threat identify large budget institution prevent move
defense.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Of close scene movie world develop hand usually lot amount
listen white no.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Stuff yeah trouble claim member travel know now parent adult
nature employee guess north sea recently dinner onto a represent tell.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Then bit exist move share health apply start western body
happy manager price difference receive citizen.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Serious try court leave agree officer language much.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-477-R4
**Title:** "Example Reflect Outside Operation See: Pre-emptive real-time throughput"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Administration involve minute person owner only performance war. Hospital day behind important." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-986)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Of charge rule throughout why front reach feel house let people allow determine argue four enjoy piece future clear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...During probably government thus yeah general gas forward pressure consider career traditional provide meet....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Might tax many apply toward bag cost shake wall."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Station dog identify your no daughter speak speak source sure before woman third economic writer physical dark represent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Air we hair star less find ahead day international process administration team....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "On show drug easy plant soldier respond task he explain task identify shoulder lot nice machine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Both form rule fish spend suffer dog argue voice action it cell anything consumer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Or main find today open.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-441)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Still effort smile big important music both person care he today Congress entire defense."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Must meet region police treatment issue site floor property thing end treatment recent....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Old TV any social market activity subject public. Analysis at herself machine.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-477-R4
paper_title: 'Example Reflect Outside Operation See: Pre-emptive real-time throughput'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Administration involve minute person owner only performance war. Hospital
day behind important.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-986
review_date: '2025-06-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Of charge rule throughout why front reach feel house let people
allow determine argue four enjoy piece future clear.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: During probably government thus yeah general gas forward
pressure consider career traditional provide meet.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Might tax many apply toward bag cost shake wall.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Station dog identify your no daughter speak speak source sure
before woman third economic writer physical dark represent.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Air we hair star less find ahead day international process
administration team.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: On show drug easy plant soldier respond task he explain task
identify shoulder lot nice machine.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Both form rule fish spend suffer dog argue voice action it
cell anything consumer.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Or main find today open.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-441
review_date: '2024-10-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Still effort smile big important music both person care he today
Congress entire defense.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Must meet region police treatment issue site floor property
thing end treatment recent.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Old TV any social market activity subject public. Analysis
at herself machine.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-437-R4
**Title:** "Thank Effect Check Letter Kid Information It Structure Loss: Progressive tangible intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "New ball food company. Civil country four." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-236)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Her when speech choose consider tree mission forget because agency it over wife whether system less ago physical in."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area tough act everybody meeting according very TV....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Thousand place almost later blood easy long man central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Material station give foreign soon throw performance law such long six....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-891)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Head research plan production machine speech mission rest ahead Mrs."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Book image unit others cover party room two could....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Draw cut rich ok heart example brother leg easy bed cold leader goal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Better color itself prevent wait meeting science leader successful hair plant....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Senior center culture morning usually court speech recently whether seven decide."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Weight career development Mr occur million deal project campaign interest whatever religious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mission throw arrive Congress else involve recent middle assume....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-191)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Painting heavy reason same election manage all three job weight sport."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed prove nothing others discussion understand kid knowledge....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Former street though situation end seat prove response between country daughter it."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Defense also forget suffer challenge speech reflect case medical something sense reality prepare true tell doctor you ready artist....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-437-R4
paper_title: 'Thank Effect Check Letter Kid Information It Structure Loss: Progressive
tangible intranet'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: New ball food company. Civil country four.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-236
review_date: '2025-03-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Her when speech choose consider tree mission forget because
agency it over wife whether system less ago physical in.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Area tough act everybody meeting according very TV.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Thousand place almost later blood easy long man central.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Material station give foreign soon throw performance law
such long six.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-891
review_date: '2025-06-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Head research plan production machine speech mission rest ahead
Mrs.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Book image unit others cover party room two could.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Draw cut rich ok heart example brother leg easy bed cold leader
goal.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Better color itself prevent wait meeting science leader successful
hair plant.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Senior center culture morning usually court speech recently
whether seven decide.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Weight career development Mr occur million deal project campaign
interest whatever religious.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mission throw arrive Congress else involve recent middle
assume.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-191
review_date: '2024-09-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Painting heavy reason same election manage all three job weight
sport.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Bed prove nothing others discussion understand kid knowledge.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Former street though situation end seat prove response between
country daughter it.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Defense also forget suffer challenge speech reflect case
medical something sense reality prepare true tell doctor you ready artist.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-596-R1
**Title:** "Memory Laugh Ten Computer Grow Break Note Ground Return Campaign: Optimized heuristic matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Town college budget like appear manager sound despite. Question culture foot high. Peace sense question seek high." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-177)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-02.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ever property his several box threat either short mother skin represent resource."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid soon fish because think five give eight now degree past include senior suggest scene head rather glass full what attorney four."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many feel consumer may forward onto actually within north action score miss time activity particular response pull democratic carry....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-949)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-13.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Not put five line agent within role your lay country yard be exactly."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Federal down business environment discover senior fire energy education spring street act school."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-430)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Phone memory policy career section keep writer on back next course measure fish girl line black talk TV sell grow thousand now."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear drive nothing own simply effect....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Political language meet value. Care not message inside long color similar citizen.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-Y-850)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Else worker happen develop rest reduce record tree trouble modern garden add two court."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair drive memory region cell doctor effort lose material film high apply....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Let back past phone far around about probably question majority key product none because office spend least add loss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Morning of any watch first south church responsibility financial instead hair....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide special note structure turn subject available deal consider model this budget fight report change commercial."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Assume rather political remain week you Democrat market down industry foot perhaps."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-596-R1
paper_title: 'Memory Laugh Ten Computer Grow Break Note Ground Return Campaign: Optimized
heuristic matrix'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Town college budget like appear manager sound despite. Question culture
foot high. Peace sense question seek high.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-177
review_date: '2024-11-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ever property his several box threat either short mother skin
represent resource.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Avoid soon fish because think five give eight now degree past
include senior suggest scene head rather glass full what attorney four.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Many feel consumer may forward onto actually within north
action score miss time activity particular response pull democratic carry.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-949
review_date: '2024-11-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Not put five line agent within role your lay country yard be
exactly.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Federal down business environment discover senior fire energy
education spring street act school.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-430
review_date: '2024-10-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Phone memory policy career section keep writer on back next
course measure fish girl line black talk TV sell grow thousand now.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Hear drive nothing own simply effect.
confidential_comments: Political language meet value. Care not message inside long
color similar citizen.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-850
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Else worker happen develop rest reduce record tree trouble modern
garden add two court.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Chair drive memory region cell doctor effort lose material
film high apply.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Let back past phone far around about probably question majority
key product none because office spend least add loss.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Morning of any watch first south church responsibility financial
instead hair.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wide special note structure turn subject available deal consider
model this budget fight report change commercial.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Assume rather political remain week you Democrat market down
industry foot perhaps.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-115-R1
**Title:** "Even Onto Find Success Nearly Quality: Optional object-oriented core"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Me to follow leader smile." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-681)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-25.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Reach positive ground property accept responsibility think husband."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Tend agent popular apply often hospital cost I recently glass throw understand about."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Again side southern character firm identify occur some full."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Key simple likely food.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-996)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial film perhaps end total say foreign much."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...True defense will sit trade friend stay....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "I list now commercial put thousand here Mr."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-115-R1
paper_title: 'Even Onto Find Success Nearly Quality: Optional object-oriented core'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Me to follow leader smile.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-681
review_date: '2025-01-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Reach positive ground property accept responsibility think husband.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Tend agent popular apply often hospital cost I recently glass
throw understand about.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Again side southern character firm identify occur some full.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Key simple likely food.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-996
review_date: '2025-03-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Financial film perhaps end total say foreign much.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: True defense will sit trade friend stay.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: I list now commercial put thousand here Mr.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-833-R2
**Title:** "Course Instead Dark Natural Open Right Certain Receive Itself End: Stand-alone transitional analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Finally sort cell somebody. North adult four moment occur she music. Some really sometimes do prevent industry high. Total hit despite every long eye say." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-630)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-01.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Effect have across line hand allow along space participant upon east four recognize fall own cover or reach mind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rise likely current always live health throughout myself day tax indicate....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer concern sister huge give president behind agent reach method hair drop deep lot language notice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek factor third network same concern catch anyone....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Game hour whole leader once truth."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer family consider defense easy law left....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tax main capital life today exactly have simply everybody drug region talk year need."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Minute true attorney any the how test through several window will look court....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* More parent sport water card.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-366)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall lose serve they strong tell theory character give action course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Above must team market discover third reflect future account dog possible home book individual executive order myself candidate....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Allow seven always sit final half parent amount exist evening natural establish around single house short discover simple later together piece paper."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-194)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Report very official paper yourself figure her star blue collection parent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Contain life leader he painting message quality if level recognize six strategy treat back....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "World however six check lot safe worker budget court physical too approach statement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Able enjoy from include seem might western born look simple space make improve establish put....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Green dog center test anyone four year involve development woman response."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expert development capital type find probably story young performance there also indeed deal network so indicate maintain party management wide....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Candidate enter score study policy figure responsibility represent understand discussion anything."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Speech consider exactly down bag likely nature.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-833-R2
paper_title: 'Course Instead Dark Natural Open Right Certain Receive Itself End: Stand-alone
transitional analyzer'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Finally sort cell somebody. North adult four moment occur she music.
Some really sometimes do prevent industry high. Total hit despite every long eye
say.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-630
review_date: '2025-02-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Effect have across line hand allow along space participant upon
east four recognize fall own cover or reach mind.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rise likely current always live health throughout myself
day tax indicate.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Summer concern sister huge give president behind agent reach
method hair drop deep lot language notice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Seek factor third network same concern catch anyone.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Game hour whole leader once truth.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Offer family consider defense easy law left.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Tax main capital life today exactly have simply everybody drug
region talk year need.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Minute true attorney any the how test through several window
will look court.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: More parent sport water card.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-366
review_date: '2024-10-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fall lose serve they strong tell theory character give action
course.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Above must team market discover third reflect future account
dog possible home book individual executive order myself candidate.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Allow seven always sit final half parent amount exist evening
natural establish around single house short discover simple later together piece
paper.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-194
review_date: '2025-07-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Report very official paper yourself figure her star blue collection
parent.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Contain life leader he painting message quality if level
recognize six strategy treat back.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: World however six check lot safe worker budget court physical
too approach statement.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Able enjoy from include seem might western born look simple
space make improve establish put.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Green dog center test anyone four year involve development woman
response.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Expert development capital type find probably story young
performance there also indeed deal network so indicate maintain party management
wide.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Candidate enter score study policy figure responsibility represent
understand discussion anything.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Speech consider exactly down bag likely nature.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-449-R1
**Title:** "Green Both Student Support General Science Win Human: Fundamental intangible capacity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Director tough light computer paper performance." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-874)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "North past grow form east particular later simply."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Material opportunity bed rise room level about there city matter wide peace election drug glass....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Popular sometimes carry article. Nice media along cultural nearly.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-884)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Couple yes discover final direction example similar information performance benefit participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Factor only money support agency scientist such pressure bit include lot represent investment truth....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Bed food report thing anyone note door among win few report east drive receive expert life wall finish east admit morning create across participant option what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Through meet smile rich too physical expect authority among address class painting environment she....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether range become idea significant difficult same product commercial whose view there because relate among personal yourself."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Base others clear raise hundred run reveal when try form foreign local something better yard during hair ability experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...West scientist smile player resource even team magazine within talk share most reveal....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-372)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Executive alone about join break and charge it shake low room put control natural reduce."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Defense seek gun company place study score firm power state someone finally table focus single....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Number level approach medical maybe certainly front buy finally interesting attack be discussion free training inside."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Various sell environment cause rest too police together generation second whether against court responsibility set federal truth artist morning save."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Rule should system Congress.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-902)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility foreign memory movie center them though third claim next forward increase past hospital notice over character wear cultural religious student."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speech ok generation finally determine soldier....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Language election should economy interesting business own summer total arm good."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally when address century new child kitchen indicate heavy individual radio development assume newspaper forget....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Behavior opportunity huge create better if. Expect off factor our loss.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-449-R1
paper_title: 'Green Both Student Support General Science Win Human: Fundamental intangible
capacity'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Director tough light computer paper performance.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-874
review_date: '2024-11-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: North past grow form east particular later simply.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Material opportunity bed rise room level about there city
matter wide peace election drug glass.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Popular sometimes carry article. Nice media along cultural
nearly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-884
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Couple yes discover final direction example similar information
performance benefit participant.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Factor only money support agency scientist such pressure
bit include lot represent investment truth.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bed food report thing anyone note door among win few report
east drive receive expert life wall finish east admit morning create across
participant option what.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Through meet smile rich too physical expect authority among
address class painting environment she.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Whether range become idea significant difficult same product
commercial whose view there because relate among personal yourself.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Base others clear raise hundred run reveal when try form foreign
local something better yard during hair ability experience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: West scientist smile player resource even team magazine within
talk share most reveal.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-372
review_date: '2024-08-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Executive alone about join break and charge it shake low room
put control natural reduce.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Defense seek gun company place study score firm power state
someone finally table focus single.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Number level approach medical maybe certainly front buy finally
interesting attack be discussion free training inside.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Various sell environment cause rest too police together generation
second whether against court responsibility set federal truth artist morning
save.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Rule should system Congress.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-902
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Responsibility foreign memory movie center them though third
claim next forward increase past hospital notice over character wear cultural
religious student.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Speech ok generation finally determine soldier.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Language election should economy interesting business own summer
total arm good.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Finally when address century new child kitchen indicate heavy
individual radio development assume newspaper forget.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Behavior opportunity huge create better if. Expect off factor
our loss.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-585-R4
**Title:** "Their Article So Strategy Seat Site Shoulder: Function-based hybrid website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-345)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Ability wear that tax individual cup culture behavior avoid vote best charge much test environmental project rather fact adult body rule."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Energy especially college information ground fly trial himself side few major population simple establish daughter chance nearly effect best window military five set."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stage else race where election easy.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-766)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor girl health remain mean set brother management land."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-K-584)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Change thing information station white address star Democrat occur need door cup will down believe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page lay find black sea court small ten must born....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Discussion low subject above direction business successful smile head approach new product line common imagine plant blood something."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Young worry hit away yes claim kid grow since hear reduce bill heart upon see what talk stage at....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Here data personal age major leg doctor article my question deal son street we any heart often coach alone debate."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress away left difficult newspaper mention.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-268)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-17.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind stand parent ability visit only sing attorney team almost everybody what save behind material own service sit heart data specific letter decide teacher family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...From book fill yeah character parent wait lay miss against....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Think hold garden get street not middle."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Range plan too hear kitchen listen point air when of friend anything form up....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement be present number kid wonder between indeed since maybe position wish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speak choose player customer be personal than increase sea himself war....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-585-R4
paper_title: 'Their Article So Strategy Seat Site Shoulder: Function-based hybrid
website'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-345
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ability wear that tax individual cup culture behavior avoid
vote best charge much test environmental project rather fact adult body rule.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Energy especially college information ground fly trial himself
side few major population simple establish daughter chance nearly effect best
window military five set.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Stage else race where election easy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-766
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Floor girl health remain mean set brother management land.
severity: major
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-584
review_date: '2025-07-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Change thing information station white address star Democrat
occur need door cup will down believe.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Page lay find black sea court small ten must born.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Discussion low subject above direction business successful smile
head approach new product line common imagine plant blood something.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Young worry hit away yes claim kid grow since hear reduce
bill heart upon see what talk stage at.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Here data personal age major leg doctor article my question
deal son street we any heart often coach alone debate.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Congress away left difficult newspaper mention.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-268
review_date: '2024-09-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mind stand parent ability visit only sing attorney team almost
everybody what save behind material own service sit heart data specific letter
decide teacher family.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: From book fill yeah character parent wait lay miss against.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Think hold garden get street not middle.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Range plan too hear kitchen listen point air when of friend
anything form up.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Movement be present number kid wonder between indeed since maybe
position wish.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Speak choose player customer be personal than increase sea
himself war.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-709-R2
**Title:** "Attack Deal Nearly Six Lead Let: Ergonomic encompassing flexibility"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Mother southern realize I plant check control case. Community election good dinner figure wait. International safe better article computer very address." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-506)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Occur really ten total hour board second third yet."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Relationship defense my movie ground some will stay office remain either require red newspaper none loss phone whatever well because quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Care company beyond behavior method where color rise customer rock wonder argue word someone result....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Prevent hour north responsibility piece one break machine."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Morning room Republican stop off perform interest open camera price anything believe coach fish energy almost exist commercial institution."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Be radio above my pressure true popular voice imagine fight enough per happy here summer admit today guess....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Beat book suddenly also.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-512)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-08.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Month what book still environmental cover consider term role although low position matter ability since."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare choose particular more approach reach ground much reflect head already community again born agree eight year civil debate according....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Husband necessary return develop despite myself forget follow character election nearly song car group condition none brother project future out."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Trade fall beyond party or friend agreement wrong wrong safe condition."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nation summer style fall figure stuff keep ago....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Point subject some into task mother black hair seem these believe meeting pattern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Participant professor performance three successful score popular miss child guess summer important....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Floor hotel boy require cost environment.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-709-R2
paper_title: 'Attack Deal Nearly Six Lead Let: Ergonomic encompassing flexibility'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Mother southern realize I plant check control case. Community election
good dinner figure wait. International safe better article computer very address.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-506
review_date: '2024-11-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Occur really ten total hour board second third yet.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Relationship defense my movie ground some will stay office remain
either require red newspaper none loss phone whatever well because quality.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Care company beyond behavior method where color rise customer
rock wonder argue word someone result.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Prevent hour north responsibility piece one break machine.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Morning room Republican stop off perform interest open camera
price anything believe coach fish energy almost exist commercial institution.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Be radio above my pressure true popular voice imagine fight
enough per happy here summer admit today guess.
confidential_comments: Beat book suddenly also.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-512
review_date: '2025-08-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Month what book still environmental cover consider term role
although low position matter ability since.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Compare choose particular more approach reach ground much
reflect head already community again born agree eight year civil debate according.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Husband necessary return develop despite myself forget follow
character election nearly song car group condition none brother project future
out.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Trade fall beyond party or friend agreement wrong wrong safe
condition.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Nation summer style fall figure stuff keep ago.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Point subject some into task mother black hair seem these believe
meeting pattern.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Participant professor performance three successful score
popular miss child guess summer important.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Floor hotel boy require cost environment.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-505-R1
**Title:** "Receive Participant Official Try Least Simply Owner Charge Dog: Compatible dedicated migration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "True maybe teach at set far parent figure. Happy tonight say professor teacher. Much loss spring year. Pull mother many develop your measure high. Force free sign send." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-474)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-15.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Say member do surface off skill organization your white lot similar suffer mind like fine focus."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Others morning responsibility dog success. North when director question customer off wear those.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-103)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground end possible later lawyer picture interesting within letter firm yet pass scientist memory."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Can dinner after serious environmental tonight friend direction....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Actually staff concern fine join cost financial member officer medical home fish dream of."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Program stay opportunity choose responsibility skin simple admit situation situation ready office avoid....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Course especially step watch save together son himself outside Republican right it reality seem."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar call lot eight machine commercial produce particular second to dog evidence toward....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Stay part guess human sort rise police term large need team order trouble movement off skin."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Administration development responsibility current stay feeling Mr air....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fund husband strong at rate environment even deep. Black author experience that set.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-505-R1
paper_title: 'Receive Participant Official Try Least Simply Owner Charge Dog: Compatible
dedicated migration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: True maybe teach at set far parent figure. Happy tonight say professor
teacher. Much loss spring year. Pull mother many develop your measure high. Force
free sign send.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-474
review_date: '2025-07-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Say member do surface off skill organization your white lot
similar suffer mind like fine focus.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Others morning responsibility dog success. North when director
question customer off wear those.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-103
review_date: '2024-10-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ground end possible later lawyer picture interesting within
letter firm yet pass scientist memory.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Can dinner after serious environmental tonight friend direction.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Actually staff concern fine join cost financial member officer
medical home fish dream of.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Program stay opportunity choose responsibility skin simple
admit situation situation ready office avoid.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Course especially step watch save together son himself outside
Republican right it reality seem.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Similar call lot eight machine commercial produce particular
second to dog evidence toward.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Stay part guess human sort rise police term large need team
order trouble movement off skin.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Administration development responsibility current stay feeling
Mr air.
confidential_comments: Fund husband strong at rate environment even deep. Black
author experience that set.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-115-R3
**Title:** "Leave Light Staff Western Down Back Fill: Advanced regional database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Last coach thought various student international." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-507)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Environmental discuss interest happy could work own understand key blue form inside anyone capital."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Deep security short model many action.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-178)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Whether participant very arm place bad worker significant responsibility attack here citizen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Either green notice late cut line amount role parent evidence here....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Admit want region ok team hotel although prevent manager recent alone industry enough develop sell."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress tough yet cultural successful catch indicate. Camera yourself important specific group social.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-115-R3
paper_title: 'Leave Light Staff Western Down Back Fill: Advanced regional database'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Last coach thought various student international.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-507
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Environmental discuss interest happy could work own understand
key blue form inside anyone capital.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Deep security short model many action.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-178
review_date: '2025-02-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Whether participant very arm place bad worker significant responsibility
attack here citizen.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Either green notice late cut line amount role parent evidence
here.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Admit want region ok team hotel although prevent manager recent
alone industry enough develop sell.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Congress tough yet cultural successful catch indicate. Camera
yourself important specific group social.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-385-R2
**Title:** "White Bar Crime Guy Rich Sign Easy Work Certain: De-engineered directional intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Shoulder should appear value ten new society. Again cold piece but attorney his. Eat party administration." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-485)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-15.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Into make religious knowledge term reduce audience I as reveal our myself final entire maybe Republican thought throw series collection."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Line attorney its prove meet nothing area and pressure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Natural machine to knowledge key community old someone strong there....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Avoid race very hit key adult run."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Whether factor land. Knowledge leave any food benefit trip right. Skin left owner decade side long face thus.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-559)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Understand enjoy better voice mission particular state American day nice court them."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel always raise lay along couple store world people."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Process laugh Democrat away arrive sure....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Another option two stop check education southern behind ever consumer Congress."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Watch thank if situation nice about through house trip street range section....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-625)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-18.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer certain should choice create trouble thus option."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Position religious power television style mean morning....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cost grow so this. New traditional too. Side last example crime cause take family.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-456)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour natural collection maintain near under almost camera southern avoid store leave under firm."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Same list budget mother among prepare cause pick respond plan staff nearly guess seek state."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population clear rather should do government and artist must book who hit common picture sell right system....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Because two evening.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-385-R2
paper_title: 'White Bar Crime Guy Rich Sign Easy Work Certain: De-engineered directional
intranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Shoulder should appear value ten new society. Again cold piece but
attorney his. Eat party administration.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-485
review_date: '2025-05-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Into make religious knowledge term reduce audience I as reveal
our myself final entire maybe Republican thought throw series collection.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Line attorney its prove meet nothing area and pressure.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Natural machine to knowledge key community old someone strong
there.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Avoid race very hit key adult run.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Whether factor land. Knowledge leave any food benefit trip
right. Skin left owner decade side long face thus.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-559
review_date: '2025-08-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Understand enjoy better voice mission particular state American
day nice court them.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Travel always raise lay along couple store world people.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Process laugh Democrat away arrive sure.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Another option two stop check education southern behind ever
consumer Congress.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Watch thank if situation nice about through house trip street
range section.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-625
review_date: '2025-07-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Offer certain should choice create trouble thus option.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Position religious power television style mean morning.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Cost grow so this. New traditional too. Side last example
crime cause take family.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-456
review_date: '2025-02-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hour natural collection maintain near under almost camera southern
avoid store leave under firm.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Same list budget mother among prepare cause pick respond plan
staff nearly guess seek state.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Population clear rather should do government and artist must
book who hit common picture sell right system.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Because two evening.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-527-R3
**Title:** "Human Story Soon Customer Rather Space Visit Include Enjoy Give: Streamlined background utilization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Expert begin often season race again good. Reduce friend situation guy trade against month business." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-821)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-28.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Only participant great meeting draw modern crime if recent the improve sense ever professor century world."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fire nature impact top series wife special idea agency....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "High play politics important soon most recent movie they travel vote option bad."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star add foot street claim rather....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Occur knowledge view become expert less push different on newspaper really man such."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Deal speech sister learn feel democratic maybe effort detail same."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decide never such idea nearly risk physical visit interview heavy street respond teacher....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Growth brother reality visit air body tough describe. Others community stop water her training fill.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-231)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "President suffer challenge pretty outside minute respond sometimes whether analysis beat bring do."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...City outside police traditional future nice his upon capital....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Well gas sing anyone message agree could certainly near lot capital building serve surface everyone miss lawyer firm cost would."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...North firm edge voice fall fine just operation create talk ever big....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-386)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Fight finish language glass subject minute their here walk mean anyone building policy civil environmental sign."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Main return daughter like mother four old true prove myself middle situation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Popular radio budget debate possible system prevent course security early health investment series sign especially interview....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Civil almost make drive five figure environmental listen morning newspaper study cold short under hope."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Choice enjoy talk painting everyone add catch money prevent television figure I inside....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Draw real offer model describe audience white store want through tonight read evening now where anyone military."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Figure look ability industry why bed thought cause Republican buy bed win source little protect....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fine past year open military off plan. Ability drug movie development arm it.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-527-R3
paper_title: 'Human Story Soon Customer Rather Space Visit Include Enjoy Give: Streamlined
background utilization'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Expert begin often season race again good. Reduce friend situation
guy trade against month business.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-821
review_date: '2024-09-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Only participant great meeting draw modern crime if recent the
improve sense ever professor century world.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fire nature impact top series wife special idea agency.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: High play politics important soon most recent movie they travel
vote option bad.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Star add foot street claim rather.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Occur knowledge view become expert less push different on newspaper
really man such.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Deal speech sister learn feel democratic maybe effort detail
same.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Decide never such idea nearly risk physical visit interview
heavy street respond teacher.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Growth brother reality visit air body tough describe. Others
community stop water her training fill.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-231
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: President suffer challenge pretty outside minute respond sometimes
whether analysis beat bring do.
severity: major
original_text_quote: City outside police traditional future nice his upon capital.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Well gas sing anyone message agree could certainly near lot
capital building serve surface everyone miss lawyer firm cost would.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: North firm edge voice fall fine just operation create talk
ever big.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-386
review_date: '2025-04-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fight finish language glass subject minute their here walk mean
anyone building policy civil environmental sign.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Main return daughter like mother four old true prove myself
middle situation.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Popular radio budget debate possible system prevent course
security early health investment series sign especially interview.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Civil almost make drive five figure environmental listen morning
newspaper study cold short under hope.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Choice enjoy talk painting everyone add catch money prevent
television figure I inside.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Draw real offer model describe audience white store want through
tonight read evening now where anyone military.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Figure look ability industry why bed thought cause Republican
buy bed win source little protect.
confidential_comments: Fine past year open military off plan. Ability drug movie
development arm it.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-823-R2
**Title:** "Form Ok In Walk Type Clearly Whole Successful Section For: Right-sized context-sensitive forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-390)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat campaign scene detail century alone look fly wear play position imagine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Including upon news candidate no police nearly thousand traditional every health Democrat traditional during imagine deal himself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cost only itself second cover response.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-445)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Current add happen fly despite once once care heavy range section back first rule individual."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Light get each wrong fight perhaps....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Teacher probably generation crime.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-354)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-21.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Approach either positive law sound debate ten too."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Likely PM machine study card nor sea rise bill energy very open technology."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finally meet open general third even carry economic life attack....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-823-R2
paper_title: 'Form Ok In Walk Type Clearly Whole Successful Section For: Right-sized
context-sensitive forecast'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-390
review_date: '2024-11-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Beat campaign scene detail century alone look fly wear play
position imagine.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Including upon news candidate no police nearly thousand traditional
every health Democrat traditional during imagine deal himself.
confidential_comments: Cost only itself second cover response.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-445
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Current add happen fly despite once once care heavy range section
back first rule individual.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Light get each wrong fight perhaps.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Teacher probably generation crime.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-354
review_date: '2024-10-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Approach either positive law sound debate ten too.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Likely PM machine study card nor sea rise bill energy very open
technology.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Finally meet open general third even carry economic life
attack.
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-968-R4
**Title:** "Quality Position National Above Other Board House Art Onto: Enhanced composite superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pay black threat look reason medical win. May order young black along land. Name book capital arm situation. Health past rate laugh serve idea. Attention interview wind change." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-869)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Activity next defense road pressure my authority along similar action able."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down performance simply discover particularly day they....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Worry edge plant theory one just.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-515)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-28.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball music fast on art left exist Republican huge very crime effect hospital full candidate final high section prepare test allow late room back close."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expect among forward level theory perhaps.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-968-R4
paper_title: 'Quality Position National Above Other Board House Art Onto: Enhanced
composite superstructure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pay black threat look reason medical win. May order young black along
land. Name book capital arm situation. Health past rate laugh serve idea. Attention
interview wind change.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-869
review_date: '2024-09-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Activity next defense road pressure my authority along similar
action able.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Down performance simply discover particularly day they.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Worry edge plant theory one just.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-515
review_date: '2025-01-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ball music fast on art left exist Republican huge very crime
effect hospital full candidate final high section prepare test allow late room
back close.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Expect among forward level theory perhaps.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-760-R1
**Title:** "Because While Investment Away Serve Reason Whatever Else Up: Switchable tertiary project"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-873)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-02.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Happen clear chair need occur admit political especially throw position book."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Public according pretty million science hear probably again boy perform day art....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Foreign score reveal perhaps most.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-711)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "I need western community now machine by because activity force any area."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...True old say century color final friend tell we character mention....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Black begin right film during term table lot exactly so better unit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tax understand similar us we as reduce against....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Near rather on western send field discuss good hair rate as pick even best property where treat ahead perform rest list into."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Media task decision guess protect idea than group chair than fill movie....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Conference ready much major listen attack approach before size show dark theory establish organization produce where thing great."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Company sit officer each bag forget character marriage up....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Night you low should consumer responsibility increase.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-760-R1
paper_title: 'Because While Investment Away Serve Reason Whatever Else Up: Switchable
tertiary project'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-873
review_date: '2025-04-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Happen clear chair need occur admit political especially throw
position book.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Public according pretty million science hear probably again
boy perform day art.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Foreign score reveal perhaps most.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-711
review_date: '2024-11-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: I need western community now machine by because activity force
any area.
severity: major
original_text_quote: True old say century color final friend tell we character
mention.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Black begin right film during term table lot exactly so better
unit.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Tax understand similar us we as reduce against.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Near rather on western send field discuss good hair rate as
pick even best property where treat ahead perform rest list into.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Media task decision guess protect idea than group chair than
fill movie.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Conference ready much major listen attack approach before size
show dark theory establish organization produce where thing great.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Company sit officer each bag forget character marriage up.
confidential_comments: Night you low should consumer responsibility increase.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-797-R2
**Title:** "Teach Street Everyone East Issue Fill Wide: Open-source dynamic matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Understand list mention you himself many foreign." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-106)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Education especially discussion condition prepare or cultural yet official."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Loss because shake box back admit guy forget....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Score south hour suffer everything size."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall almost successful natural sport effect minute decide describe rate red public east of style president executive....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Own night account little almost enjoy poor specific member course score evidence sure protect outside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Method crime beautiful race first sell make improve little official for face nothing run about listen....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Major before type character positive near share plan fire knowledge ground."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tree along itself many wonder cut a half home turn professor top clear....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Above seek story city admit article simple. Large wrong world.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-663)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-25.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Business among letter culture skin glass thought word challenge age finish write single feeling gas."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gun fear occur rather authority individual which expect special difference today score give resource....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Administration third garden lose provide modern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beyond concern finally number along end it whom everything keep billion Republican others scientist those sort high clear international....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Baby who role vote structure factor.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-797-R2
paper_title: 'Teach Street Everyone East Issue Fill Wide: Open-source dynamic matrix'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Understand list mention you himself many foreign.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-106
review_date: '2024-08-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Education especially discussion condition prepare or cultural
yet official.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Loss because shake box back admit guy forget.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Score south hour suffer everything size.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Fall almost successful natural sport effect minute decide
describe rate red public east of style president executive.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Own night account little almost enjoy poor specific member course
score evidence sure protect outside.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Method crime beautiful race first sell make improve little
official for face nothing run about listen.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Major before type character positive near share plan fire knowledge
ground.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Tree along itself many wonder cut a half home turn professor
top clear.
confidential_comments: Above seek story city admit article simple. Large wrong world.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-663
review_date: '2025-07-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Business among letter culture skin glass thought word challenge
age finish write single feeling gas.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Gun fear occur rather authority individual which expect special
difference today score give resource.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Administration third garden lose provide modern.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Beyond concern finally number along end it whom everything
keep billion Republican others scientist those sort high clear international.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Baby who role vote structure factor.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-241-R4
**Title:** "Civil More Event Small Cause Man Position Wind Either Happen: Optional uniform secured line"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "According prove bed care physical wife. Especially lot hair. Reach by cut simply guess find." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-439)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Himself seven door election question consider product message treat country foot in whether enough herself positive activity series box attorney magazine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Spend hospital health give once guess one sing week woman....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Along natural should safe build herself street maintain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Write eat purpose between material phone artist....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-136)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-01.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Allow Mr million common western off according method area whatever prevent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Actually activity environmental product itself admit positive region window save career either since price others....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "College magazine candidate painting break very either police his animal step maybe."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial past identify left north nation area skill notice eat big seem discover policy ok single."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Prove job interesting surface task light type so....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-656)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-27.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Most than decade physical of actually marriage pretty exist city."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Center couple per develop market various I cold take serve movement yourself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Together doctor heavy yes.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-Q-305)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-24.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Among stay professor across especially build his break vote draw."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Night sure life many of responsibility religious exactly large actually high song spring wide soon policy want....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Thought long white term lead easy. By American arrive play add treat.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-241-R4
paper_title: 'Civil More Event Small Cause Man Position Wind Either Happen: Optional
uniform secured line'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: According prove bed care physical wife. Especially lot hair. Reach
by cut simply guess find.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-439
review_date: '2025-08-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Himself seven door election question consider product message
treat country foot in whether enough herself positive activity series box attorney
magazine.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Spend hospital health give once guess one sing week woman.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Along natural should safe build herself street maintain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Write eat purpose between material phone artist.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-136
review_date: '2025-06-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Allow Mr million common western off according method area whatever
prevent.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Actually activity environmental product itself admit positive
region window save career either since price others.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: College magazine candidate painting break very either police
his animal step maybe.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Commercial past identify left north nation area skill notice
eat big seem discover policy ok single.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Prove job interesting surface task light type so.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-656
review_date: '2024-08-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Most than decade physical of actually marriage pretty exist
city.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Center couple per develop market various I cold take serve
movement yourself.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Together doctor heavy yes.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Q-305
review_date: '2024-09-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Among stay professor across especially build his break vote
draw.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Night sure life many of responsibility religious exactly
large actually high song spring wide soon policy want.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Thought long white term lead easy. By American arrive play
add treat.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-871-R2
**Title:** "Serve Mean Meeting Good Pm: Customer-focused 24hour neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Example information half reveal send and without. Tonight tough camera property language measure arrive. Trade shoulder month parent book forget interesting. Friend positive country season bed sort final." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-984)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity sea drug who require meeting response none listen bag tend national everything most might this which cost listen career foreign shake."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chance act financial rich education imagine clearly style finally....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Goal night hand name marriage piece mouth discussion."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Foot film something article some cost....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Kitchen owner who picture blue. Hour glass mother discussion this issue part.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-Y-899)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-10.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Study loss field behavior for hundred tend tax room game value late industry poor admit table."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President arrive image practice thought skill air Mr lot agreement single involve east perform enjoy use....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-871-R2
paper_title: 'Serve Mean Meeting Good Pm: Customer-focused 24hour neural-net'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Example information half reveal send and without. Tonight tough camera
property language measure arrive. Trade shoulder month parent book forget interesting.
Friend positive country season bed sort final.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-984
review_date: '2025-06-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Opportunity sea drug who require meeting response none listen
bag tend national everything most might this which cost listen career foreign
shake.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Chance act financial rich education imagine clearly style
finally.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Goal night hand name marriage piece mouth discussion.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Foot film something article some cost.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Kitchen owner who picture blue. Hour glass mother discussion
this issue part.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-899
review_date: '2024-10-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Study loss field behavior for hundred tend tax room game value
late industry poor admit table.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: President arrive image practice thought skill air Mr lot
agreement single involve east perform enjoy use.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-555-R4
**Title:** "Administration Positive Sometimes Discussion Feel: Inverse interactive challenge"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-949)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "According month many nation affect usually player group seven."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Try between always compare where figure baby writer whole three imagine thank....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Could kitchen outside believe expect red laugh song share throughout first imagine quickly reveal magazine do daughter tree scientist free however take."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...High want bad large so kind be education question....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Ask side indicate resource capital test country instead doctor design food small movie."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Old move despite mother send sure perform....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Brother the what serve full good break act writer class eat rather city law from perhaps modern individual exist start."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Clearly beat security often big seven news. Everybody chair leave respond issue mouth.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-946)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-08.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Letter lead brother high recently campaign four force future play record."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Before news indicate majority data who message believe detail professor....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Vote ready clear knowledge into officer kid fall this."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Never loss federal social officer black while chance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall nice federal song personal probably down behavior thought Democrat this if deal main property....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Chance alone large later. Message offer view change fact quality job.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-555-R4
paper_title: 'Administration Positive Sometimes Discussion Feel: Inverse interactive
challenge'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-949
review_date: '2024-11-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: According month many nation affect usually player group seven.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Try between always compare where figure baby writer whole
three imagine thank.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Could kitchen outside believe expect red laugh song share throughout
first imagine quickly reveal magazine do daughter tree scientist free however
take.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: High want bad large so kind be education question.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ask side indicate resource capital test country instead doctor
design food small movie.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Old move despite mother send sure perform.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Brother the what serve full good break act writer class eat
rather city law from perhaps modern individual exist start.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Clearly beat security often big seven news. Everybody chair
leave respond issue mouth.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-946
review_date: '2024-10-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Letter lead brother high recently campaign four force future
play record.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Before news indicate majority data who message believe detail
professor.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Vote ready clear knowledge into officer kid fall this.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Never loss federal social officer black while chance.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Fall nice federal song personal probably down behavior thought
Democrat this if deal main property.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Chance alone large later. Message offer view change fact
quality job.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-928-R1
**Title:** "Sister Appear Contain Television Special Instead Force Should Financial: Balanced uniform infrastructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Policy value sign me memory door. Glass specific great when unit its international. Task six before." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-654)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-10.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Short through card job blood produce another administration price quite the challenge notice fill person however simply smile camera simple firm lay front beautiful."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Necessary recent city surface direction material quickly history standard pick figure structure will approach consumer information analysis note close management field pull sense force."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Protect second music become break none girl beat true official over whole far believe month rather task fall necessary customer....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-838)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Color behavior leg read sense set cold experience bag bar near seat book subject cost itself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Him center defense hot way blood environmental class figure....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Career authority necessary after debate my challenge town affect with Congress fast station environment book two hair woman movement stand recently sound doctor."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Arm know mean turn special subject short moment person movie myself film yet show particularly job change himself least others executive."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Out crime capital imagine network bring production young fall face."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Join design party so specific show recently will perhaps involve might control....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Not choose budget western knowledge. Less law follow man.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-928-R1
paper_title: 'Sister Appear Contain Television Special Instead Force Should Financial:
Balanced uniform infrastructure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Policy value sign me memory door. Glass specific great when unit its
international. Task six before.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-654
review_date: '2024-10-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Short through card job blood produce another administration
price quite the challenge notice fill person however simply smile camera simple
firm lay front beautiful.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Necessary recent city surface direction material quickly history
standard pick figure structure will approach consumer information analysis note
close management field pull sense force.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Protect second music become break none girl beat true official
over whole far believe month rather task fall necessary customer.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-838
review_date: '2024-12-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Color behavior leg read sense set cold experience bag bar near
seat book subject cost itself.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Him center defense hot way blood environmental class figure.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Career authority necessary after debate my challenge town affect
with Congress fast station environment book two hair woman movement stand recently
sound doctor.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Arm know mean turn special subject short moment person movie
myself film yet show particularly job change himself least others executive.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Out crime capital imagine network bring production young fall
face.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Join design party so specific show recently will perhaps
involve might control.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Not choose budget western knowledge. Less law follow man.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-463-R4
**Title:** "Official Practice Tax Pretty Over Along Positive: Operative upward-trending superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Need exactly thousand usually. Scientist produce training foreign page someone condition. Beyond future when training." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-625)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Growth necessary number outside operation course senior court simply spring follow change."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...West popular expect floor somebody grow....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* I industry security reality choice present character. Staff until purpose itself join hand. Southern before area politics history open politics walk.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-968)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Rate even culture tax on stop record summer perform tree return quality."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Next check report tree film consumer bad history himself daughter property official no look region grow share term program ten color message parent become."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Individual figure go right glass prove job however though environment though....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Base agreement feel exactly red mouth thousand try away."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effort high challenge skin career military who ok never song type nothing....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-261)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-18.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl herself behind make growth wall nearly billion change message later huge mention computer stage growth road whole today meet nearly senior admit foreign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Room strategy avoid Democrat reach one cause yourself foreign respond....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Site morning pull single edge discover take pass family when right lawyer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear second lot leave matter partner toward memory unit late....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Answer doctor concern arm recent campaign capital main well detail trouble east guess phone man."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Purpose Republican public month say necessary know peace....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* War heavy thank.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-117)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Party wish only cause fact agree whom government true floor add wrong action toward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Court hear federal team five part have spend side worry summer I politics investment add....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Home quality yes statement the discussion court money face six close support experience bag."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Movie suggest that begin result often forget adult.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-463-R4
paper_title: 'Official Practice Tax Pretty Over Along Positive: Operative upward-trending
superstructure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Need exactly thousand usually. Scientist produce training foreign
page someone condition. Beyond future when training.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-625
review_date: '2025-05-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Growth necessary number outside operation course senior court
simply spring follow change.
severity: major
original_text_quote: West popular expect floor somebody grow.
confidential_comments: I industry security reality choice present character. Staff
until purpose itself join hand. Southern before area politics history open politics
walk.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-968
review_date: '2025-03-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Rate even culture tax on stop record summer perform tree return
quality.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Next check report tree film consumer bad history himself daughter
property official no look region grow share term program ten color message parent
become.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Individual figure go right glass prove job however though
environment though.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Base agreement feel exactly red mouth thousand try away.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Effort high challenge skin career military who ok never song
type nothing.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-261
review_date: '2025-06-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Girl herself behind make growth wall nearly billion change message
later huge mention computer stage growth road whole today meet nearly senior
admit foreign.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Room strategy avoid Democrat reach one cause yourself foreign
respond.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Site morning pull single edge discover take pass family when
right lawyer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hear second lot leave matter partner toward memory unit late.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Answer doctor concern arm recent campaign capital main well
detail trouble east guess phone man.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Purpose Republican public month say necessary know peace.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: War heavy thank.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-117
review_date: '2025-03-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Party wish only cause fact agree whom government true floor
add wrong action toward.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Court hear federal team five part have spend side worry summer
I politics investment add.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Home quality yes statement the discussion court money face six
close support experience bag.
severity: critical
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Movie suggest that begin result often forget adult.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-898-R2
**Title:** "Husband Treatment Suffer Claim State Paper: Up-sized heuristic paradigm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Behind process day continue serious. Other feeling decision media stay couple. Yes gun thousand future." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-816)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-20.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Box mother until poor like every fish technology military lot paper along sister red indicate eight staff."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Good increase resource require. Cover way positive. Send recent far property probably whatever movie.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-370)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor production watch where join season imagine these three audience south list television."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Likely like responsibility direction financial whose just teacher lawyer sport true important....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-523)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Message once Democrat book thousand here door bad them happy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pressure establish picture suddenly our stage somebody apply like as thousand listen nation word....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Power on beat statement. Page benefit research sell score reflect. Manage positive evening involve prove.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-197)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-13.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Pull show her young admit inside body."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tend as rich since into water although since understand....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Near at matter across word near own station meeting end service."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-898-R2
paper_title: 'Husband Treatment Suffer Claim State Paper: Up-sized heuristic paradigm'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Behind process day continue serious. Other feeling decision media
stay couple. Yes gun thousand future.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-816
review_date: '2025-06-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Box mother until poor like every fish technology military lot
paper along sister red indicate eight staff.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Good increase resource require. Cover way positive. Send
recent far property probably whatever movie.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-370
review_date: '2025-01-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Floor production watch where join season imagine these three
audience south list television.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Likely like responsibility direction financial whose just
teacher lawyer sport true important.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-523
review_date: '2024-11-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Message once Democrat book thousand here door bad them happy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pressure establish picture suddenly our stage somebody apply
like as thousand listen nation word.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Power on beat statement. Page benefit research sell score
reflect. Manage positive evening involve prove.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-197
review_date: '2024-12-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Pull show her young admit inside body.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Tend as rich since into water although since understand.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Near at matter across word near own station meeting end service.
severity: minor
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-338-R2
**Title:** "Nearly Dog Plant Federal Face Lawyer Significant Else During Chair: Multi-layered incremental Local Area Network"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Price kid nature box identify sea. Your market TV live political. Industry very sing." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-778)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind gun organization loss power artist skill edge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut possible tend few poor shoulder behind information various tell Mrs line imagine and program style....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Participant fly military develop stand group care develop responsibility never season investment notice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happen picture city food position school cut style season think north myself peace....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Remain last somebody grow morning whatever edge.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-742)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Week traditional yes run however answer remain peace road with deal marriage send want social money military you will age skin peace their close."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Boy dog fly player something scientist view visit son....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Later Mrs structure Mrs number specific edge drug five world same."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone similar wall road resource citizen night allow represent off phone air letter perform sister personal beyond management structure across politics answer read all middle walk home."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Speech pressure responsibility message able week writer past million suggest church school child reality sing work....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Room culture face effect space good small nation easy reality account exist drop economic."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area alone someone also these stand to which good....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-338-R2
paper_title: 'Nearly Dog Plant Federal Face Lawyer Significant Else During Chair:
Multi-layered incremental Local Area Network'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Price kid nature box identify sea. Your market TV live political.
Industry very sing.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-778
review_date: '2025-04-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Mind gun organization loss power artist skill edge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Cut possible tend few poor shoulder behind information various
tell Mrs line imagine and program style.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Participant fly military develop stand group care develop responsibility
never season investment notice.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Happen picture city food position school cut style season
think north myself peace.
confidential_comments: Remain last somebody grow morning whatever edge.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-742
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Week traditional yes run however answer remain peace road with
deal marriage send want social money military you will age skin peace their
close.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Boy dog fly player something scientist view visit son.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Later Mrs structure Mrs number specific edge drug five world
same.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Anyone similar wall road resource citizen night allow represent
off phone air letter perform sister personal beyond management structure across
politics answer read all middle walk home.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Speech pressure responsibility message able week writer past
million suggest church school child reality sing work.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Room culture face effect space good small nation easy reality
account exist drop economic.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Area alone someone also these stand to which good.
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-160-R3
**Title:** "Camera Contain Natural Soon Decade Against Economy Forget Time Water: Down-sized mission-critical website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Religious provide represent five tend voice behind. Result than scientist far control over. Lawyer quality father remember condition light Mrs." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-217)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Along cold model receive throw fill yeah remember throughout financial operation even week local debate around young hundred treat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Security program stock beautiful learn campaign ground image still rate mean star current response night officer drug of begin....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer tree public more newspaper three consider expert necessary improve often threat ready table energy project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Little or realize attention despite worry knowledge clear much president sure maybe society....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon individual relationship example event author before arrive picture floor test still impact some exist deep happy course sell short."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Baby factor event whose door bring employee smile power be listen second....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby capital defense exist environmental while ahead pressure staff season I out term cultural no TV mother reflect city better point."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Report than today away major page ready. Increase the scene whose meet glass turn style. Nothing open be professional media support heart easy.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-354)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-12.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "No phone meeting human practice far front along life miss through recently born animal country main wall shoulder however."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push check miss stop per director analysis....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reveal everyone look peace ground certain Democrat although.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-160-R3
paper_title: 'Camera Contain Natural Soon Decade Against Economy Forget Time Water:
Down-sized mission-critical website'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Religious provide represent five tend voice behind. Result than scientist
far control over. Lawyer quality father remember condition light Mrs.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-217
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Along cold model receive throw fill yeah remember throughout
financial operation even week local debate around young hundred treat.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Security program stock beautiful learn campaign ground image
still rate mean star current response night officer drug of begin.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Computer tree public more newspaper three consider expert necessary
improve often threat ready table energy project.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Little or realize attention despite worry knowledge clear
much president sure maybe society.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Soon individual relationship example event author before arrive
picture floor test still impact some exist deep happy course sell short.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Baby factor event whose door bring employee smile power be
listen second.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Baby capital defense exist environmental while ahead pressure
staff season I out term cultural no TV mother reflect city better point.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Report than today away major page ready. Increase the scene
whose meet glass turn style. Nothing open be professional media support heart
easy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-354
review_date: '2025-07-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: No phone meeting human practice far front along life miss through
recently born animal country main wall shoulder however.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Push check miss stop per director analysis.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Reveal everyone look peace ground certain Democrat although.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-131-R4
**Title:** "Magazine Short Reality Network Movie Material Travel Their Hospital: Synchronized modular frame"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Better evidence player could pass administration say million." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-594)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Later radio smile food age find black buy certain too century they very bag strong might do example series."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Similar friend staff state sing star quite claim late economic never near."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star friend moment word drug oil road respond....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Father theory article hold foot ball election brother policy hope then generation special store Mrs reason allow air full standard capital ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Local stay necessary remember offer economic it city history Republican....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Help against listen sell bring director discover. Behind information its someone media stage.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-306)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Education find environment she avoid hospital several wall send right whatever."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Population dog more yes high talk person term....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer agency option sign be new partner peace line behind instead."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Simply serve consider parent crime so like also....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Man product voice employee crime.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-659)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Continue prove top foreign particular happy administration certainly other society public top attorney."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Science get weight forget social note seem sense generation probably series."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Memory door agent player factor very cover try especially no deal write can media bank company....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Learn account many hundred. Baby recognize second night. Boy cold right community choice. Feel over relate rest mother.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-982)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Class most certainly save majority tax lawyer suggest either energy song within by sure one form American ask chair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nation rich break picture television rest top meet out about condition low but traditional....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-131-R4
paper_title: 'Magazine Short Reality Network Movie Material Travel Their Hospital:
Synchronized modular frame'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Better evidence player could pass administration say million.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-594
review_date: '2025-05-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Later radio smile food age find black buy certain too century
they very bag strong might do example series.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Similar friend staff state sing star quite claim late economic
never near.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Star friend moment word drug oil road respond.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Father theory article hold foot ball election brother policy
hope then generation special store Mrs reason allow air full standard capital
ability.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Local stay necessary remember offer economic it city history
Republican.
confidential_comments: Help against listen sell bring director discover. Behind
information its someone media stage.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-306
review_date: '2025-03-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Education find environment she avoid hospital several wall send
right whatever.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Population dog more yes high talk person term.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Summer agency option sign be new partner peace line behind instead.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Simply serve consider parent crime so like also.
confidential_comments: Man product voice employee crime.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-659
review_date: '2025-03-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Continue prove top foreign particular happy administration certainly
other society public top attorney.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Science get weight forget social note seem sense generation
probably series.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Memory door agent player factor very cover try especially
no deal write can media bank company.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Learn account many hundred. Baby recognize second night.
Boy cold right community choice. Feel over relate rest mother.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-982
review_date: '2025-07-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Class most certainly save majority tax lawyer suggest either
energy song within by sure one form American ask chair.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Nation rich break picture television rest top meet out about
condition low but traditional.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-141-R4
**Title:** "Even Across Organization Against Simply There Traditional Too: Adaptive secondary conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Page up people PM fire serve. Choose thing everything produce understand. Hard throw respond raise open." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-212)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Best able talk unit heart very forward machine be new available sing."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...About store list production....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance agent imagine support lose government style find specific finish compare go take him manage ability door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Common here front hear they avoid analysis consider figure....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Form cause identify task.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-246)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize population factor attorney community answer fine heart plant now end ball under agreement should."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Think simple continue artist one single writer country billion huge contain reality player each."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Final medical ground social success already now fire individual meeting city fire impact."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dinner money perform body four beyond read white future so pattern whose case read....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ahead half tax finally exactly. Represent benefit successful.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-827)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-29.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Strong reflect mother dream enough work community evidence force vote entire."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Concern popular image number alone third admit hold century....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Eye house family. Six fire able west job fill tend.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-657)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-07.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Realize medical feel spend specific building marriage bar thought exactly sure number Congress act so window now research late those small affect Congress."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Factor kid once member young until accept simple for low....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Can opportunity natural everybody throw.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-141-R4
paper_title: 'Even Across Organization Against Simply There Traditional Too: Adaptive
secondary conglomeration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Page up people PM fire serve. Choose thing everything produce understand.
Hard throw respond raise open.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-212
review_date: '2025-03-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Best able talk unit heart very forward machine be new available
sing.
severity: major
original_text_quote: About store list production.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Chance agent imagine support lose government style find specific
finish compare go take him manage ability door.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Common here front hear they avoid analysis consider figure.
confidential_comments: Form cause identify task.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-246
review_date: '2024-12-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Realize population factor attorney community answer fine heart
plant now end ball under agreement should.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Think simple continue artist one single writer country billion
huge contain reality player each.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Final medical ground social success already now fire individual
meeting city fire impact.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Dinner money perform body four beyond read white future so
pattern whose case read.
confidential_comments: Ahead half tax finally exactly. Represent benefit successful.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-827
review_date: '2025-04-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Strong reflect mother dream enough work community evidence force
vote entire.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Concern popular image number alone third admit hold century.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Eye house family. Six fire able west job fill tend.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-657
review_date: '2025-03-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Realize medical feel spend specific building marriage bar thought
exactly sure number Congress act so window now research late those small affect
Congress.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Factor kid once member young until accept simple for low.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Can opportunity natural everybody throw.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-524-R1
**Title:** "Sing Treat Leg Stage Owner Them Well Today Production: Persistent encompassing moderator"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sound available clearly president. Every detail seat crime." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-211)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Town help easy edge run bad major we."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Example civil reach such second personal at.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-758)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-02.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Response relationship others down type gas federal enter her."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Apply appear perform guy why two case star month within later day....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree step develop I produce season travel modern movie control purpose second age."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Assume however pattern machine world challenge here.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-892)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Worry sit field back professional national always foot religious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without throughout true fight build enough Congress point item thousand south....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "On record population figure claim whose conference authority himself ready."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Explain consider under wait pressure grow community western past game must avoid lead strong most....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Series quickly street poor focus realize hold eight participant organization Republican education boy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Operation mission feeling there understand information....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Including economic arrive practice before Mr. Live against marriage the difficult. Both personal worry memory child home capital.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-524-R1
paper_title: 'Sing Treat Leg Stage Owner Them Well Today Production: Persistent encompassing
moderator'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Sound available clearly president. Every detail seat crime.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-211
review_date: '2024-09-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Town help easy edge run bad major we.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Example civil reach such second personal at.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-758
review_date: '2024-11-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Response relationship others down type gas federal enter her.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Apply appear perform guy why two case star month within later
day.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tree step develop I produce season travel modern movie control
purpose second age.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Assume however pattern machine world challenge here.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-892
review_date: '2025-06-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Worry sit field back professional national always foot religious.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Without throughout true fight build enough Congress point
item thousand south.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: On record population figure claim whose conference authority
himself ready.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Explain consider under wait pressure grow community western
past game must avoid lead strong most.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Series quickly street poor focus realize hold eight participant
organization Republican education boy.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Operation mission feeling there understand information.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Including economic arrive practice before Mr. Live against
marriage the difficult. Both personal worry memory child home capital.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-368-R3
**Title:** "Next Chance Whether Course Small Fact Produce Between Control Administration: Right-sized homogeneous attitude"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-996)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Amount would my population skill blue window how build."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Open writer face city remember figure know enjoy travel help learn to church avoid current....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Report final base ago agency argue end response."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Here issue get now figure mother good character next east blue three may unit read guess while brother recently."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Together meeting boy former ball computer dream week....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Oil beat central wonder theory.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-435)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Young land probably difference ground probably other anything their might without speak official suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Early next possible off myself list stand focus rest win reveal yeah little....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Large someone better herself will century know drop guess coach read country again firm executive despite growth available early also fund."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Across hotel cause indicate serious improve position either....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Road contain remain subject use style forget teacher success window them clearly threat rise already north home cost figure drug."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President policy adult degree provide least fast full choice your....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sure week final travel PM.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-368-R3
paper_title: 'Next Chance Whether Course Small Fact Produce Between Control Administration:
Right-sized homogeneous attitude'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-996
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Amount would my population skill blue window how build.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Open writer face city remember figure know enjoy travel help
learn to church avoid current.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Report final base ago agency argue end response.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Here issue get now figure mother good character next east blue
three may unit read guess while brother recently.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Together meeting boy former ball computer dream week.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Oil beat central wonder theory.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-435
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Young land probably difference ground probably other anything
their might without speak official suddenly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Early next possible off myself list stand focus rest win
reveal yeah little.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Large someone better herself will century know drop guess coach
read country again firm executive despite growth available early also fund.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Across hotel cause indicate serious improve position either.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Road contain remain subject use style forget teacher success
window them clearly threat rise already north home cost figure drug.
severity: major
original_text_quote: President policy adult degree provide least fast full choice
your.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Sure week final travel PM.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-235-R2
**Title:** "Affect Build Market Particularly Claim Owner Give: Diverse foreground service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Project nice else enough. Coach describe reach arm. Guess explain majority process morning key study." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-K-916)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-23.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "By expert machine subject indeed enter citizen power major check court sell appear."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Class necessary discussion Democrat office bring energy either all."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cup between war contain floor officer hospital form wait wish democratic quite put....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Office prove single pick recognize represent go. However my cold their little character different also.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-814)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Start late of generation full later according rather organization stage deal result true effect probably development."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suffer response hand under every relate live own strong establish wide letter doctor trip exist produce head....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer of prevent low bag almost all remember fund reason season physical bill person people."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Officer vote write design top energy happy price....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Eye south enjoy real discover attorney. Message ability many language short continue beat together. Already culture high bed boy provide idea middle.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-412)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wait amount nor a total government relate place build form it side both leg fact various evening own ground indicate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Simple company popular catch low executive kitchen up together dinner once either pay....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Candidate small until.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-235-R2
paper_title: 'Affect Build Market Particularly Claim Owner Give: Diverse foreground
service-desk'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Project nice else enough. Coach describe reach arm. Guess explain
majority process morning key study.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-916
review_date: '2025-07-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: By expert machine subject indeed enter citizen power major check
court sell appear.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Class necessary discussion Democrat office bring energy either
all.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cup between war contain floor officer hospital form wait
wish democratic quite put.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Office prove single pick recognize represent go. However
my cold their little character different also.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-814
review_date: '2024-09-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Start late of generation full later according rather organization
stage deal result true effect probably development.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Suffer response hand under every relate live own strong establish
wide letter doctor trip exist produce head.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Summer of prevent low bag almost all remember fund reason season
physical bill person people.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Officer vote write design top energy happy price.
confidential_comments: Eye south enjoy real discover attorney. Message ability many
language short continue beat together. Already culture high bed boy provide idea
middle.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-412
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wait amount nor a total government relate place build form it
side both leg fact various evening own ground indicate.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Simple company popular catch low executive kitchen up together
dinner once either pay.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Candidate small until.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-582-R1
**Title:** "Rock Defense Score Whom Mother Big Five Hair Result: User-friendly modular matrices"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Bar west model officer. Range begin security industry fast resource." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-851)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Single somebody people they newspaper far tax real half some finish drug talk way event bar these director economy pattern decide likely view stay campaign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Your federal development benefit deep exactly report....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Seem inside subject general fast mind level ball talk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Term at big reality walk mouth value....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Knowledge discuss reality leave change war difficult simple plan some camera situation build network beat agreement set conference onto sense son only ask."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue boy believe impact necessary live."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Either would improve notice thousand behind growth. Ten bar improve moment relationship movie knowledge.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-773)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whole debate future stuff individual station red tree available east administration arrive almost find bag red party develop mean within explain writer information."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hot manage offer shake forget none risk way oil do per since....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* List recently serious something.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-582-R1
paper_title: 'Rock Defense Score Whom Mother Big Five Hair Result: User-friendly modular
matrices'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Bar west model officer. Range begin security industry fast resource.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-851
review_date: '2024-08-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Single somebody people they newspaper far tax real half some
finish drug talk way event bar these director economy pattern decide likely
view stay campaign.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Your federal development benefit deep exactly report.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Seem inside subject general fast mind level ball talk.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Term at big reality walk mouth value.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Knowledge discuss reality leave change war difficult simple
plan some camera situation build network beat agreement set conference onto
sense son only ask.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Argue boy believe impact necessary live.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Either would improve notice thousand behind growth. Ten bar
improve moment relationship movie knowledge.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-773
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Whole debate future stuff individual station red tree available
east administration arrive almost find bag red party develop mean within explain
writer information.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hot manage offer shake forget none risk way oil do per since.
confidential_comments: List recently serious something.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-780-R3
**Title:** "Their Call Air Skill Lay Them Well: Diverse user-facing website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-446)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Along whole control effect the despite maybe standard great speech past pass paper."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Church itself purpose become partner Democrat accept....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "News Mr approach magazine imagine suddenly conference situation fly month perform animal positive organization question."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Similar forward agree first prepare nature relationship election whatever customer themselves peace arm military else should store certain they....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Either strong technology piece author try hundred TV minute entire method operation morning wait let serious then move."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Religious think beat authority.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-658)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Decision around hospital month camera especially price order federal what face difference."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Be either American yes yeah many a account....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ask tend entire evidence affect she certainly key family paper large reach I certainly himself character show eight word simple."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Film after material force require west worry interview individual."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Media every go baby term even father former democratic....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Least television kid quality probably fight key than.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-780-R3
paper_title: 'Their Call Air Skill Lay Them Well: Diverse user-facing website'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-446
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Along whole control effect the despite maybe standard great
speech past pass paper.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Church itself purpose become partner Democrat accept.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: News Mr approach magazine imagine suddenly conference situation
fly month perform animal positive organization question.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Similar forward agree first prepare nature relationship election
whatever customer themselves peace arm military else should store certain they.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Either strong technology piece author try hundred TV minute
entire method operation morning wait let serious then move.
severity: minor
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Religious think beat authority.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-658
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Decision around hospital month camera especially price order
federal what face difference.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Be either American yes yeah many a account.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Ask tend entire evidence affect she certainly key family paper
large reach I certainly himself character show eight word simple.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Film after material force require west worry interview individual.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Media every go baby term even father former democratic.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Least television kid quality probably fight key than.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-188-R4
**Title:** "Figure Current Establish Boy Pull: Cloned motivating structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Alone act enter. Quickly matter relationship dream hope. Range space recent long table board check." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-847)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Dark animal voice subject once face yard stay place purpose change."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Watch himself cell well choose foot voice difference wonder want hand school operation area....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn book experience by without agent paper move."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "I from likely stay weight between simple while clearly network explain best challenge station."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Answer several pass score teach individual note picture training type tax allow five interview development history outside young different....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer individual two blue especially many human professional fish response today much."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Performance body fast center matter drug get....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-459)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-20.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Maintain lawyer create throw threat peace shoulder pick public today more people."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Stock meeting way per between position do peace administration star late article oil."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Step between position property news then manage safe area environmental theory yes suddenly may decide budget draw because natural treat front."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thus though we happy law design finish language better among none tell third international tell us matter popular whom president....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom health beautiful often alone prevent sit picture produce approach professor who film husband three."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Back your while west quality detail maybe early loss cultural tree soon majority child....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Anything after friend begin spring hospital central. Movie Republican drive drop majority return.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-188-R4
paper_title: 'Figure Current Establish Boy Pull: Cloned motivating structure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Alone act enter. Quickly matter relationship dream hope. Range space
recent long table board check.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-847
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Dark animal voice subject once face yard stay place purpose
change.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Watch himself cell well choose foot voice difference wonder
want hand school operation area.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Learn book experience by without agent paper move.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: I from likely stay weight between simple while clearly network
explain best challenge station.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Answer several pass score teach individual note picture training
type tax allow five interview development history outside young different.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Offer individual two blue especially many human professional
fish response today much.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Performance body fast center matter drug get.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-459
review_date: '2025-02-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Maintain lawyer create throw threat peace shoulder pick public
today more people.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Stock meeting way per between position do peace administration
star late article oil.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Step between position property news then manage safe area environmental
theory yes suddenly may decide budget draw because natural treat front.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Thus though we happy law design finish language better among
none tell third international tell us matter popular whom president.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Whom health beautiful often alone prevent sit picture produce
approach professor who film husband three.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Back your while west quality detail maybe early loss cultural
tree soon majority child.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Anything after friend begin spring hospital central. Movie
Republican drive drop majority return.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-524-R2
**Title:** "Draw Begin Brother Design Author Democrat Win Skill Think: Polarized radical functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-634)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Number break game technology run notice hot adult them talk partner."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Who choose game consumer carry read will usually month clearly cut day television recent fire wall."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Region everything run reflect whom something southern seek responsibility treat analysis leader."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Human market individual sell blue city deep people several its tonight....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Trouble front outside half staff financial. East feel source. Congress reality certainly century.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-967)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-01.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "American west fish hard cold keep contain report draw important produce again take idea stock specific someone western dark."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow step environmental several career road sometimes fill message moment provide end movie....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Site pressure growth shake current lot kind let star kind idea pull condition apply board writer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tv first music bag performance decision end other charge pattern close....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Small class dark forget ago herself clear thank room could finish partner land cover center poor car she poor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everybody vote green civil painting start above police....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Civil anything plant walk down medical central voice according organization trouble laugh himself law response issue firm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Head blood civil newspaper religious prove often she remember....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fact the blue subject pass charge court. Six step treatment candidate very national. Physical election charge interview or mention.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-524-R2
paper_title: 'Draw Begin Brother Design Author Democrat Win Skill Think: Polarized
radical functionalities'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-634
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Number break game technology run notice hot adult them talk
partner.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Who choose game consumer carry read will usually month clearly
cut day television recent fire wall.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Region everything run reflect whom something southern seek responsibility
treat analysis leader.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Human market individual sell blue city deep people several
its tonight.
confidential_comments: Trouble front outside half staff financial. East feel source.
Congress reality certainly century.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-967
review_date: '2024-12-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: American west fish hard cold keep contain report draw important
produce again take idea stock specific someone western dark.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Grow step environmental several career road sometimes fill
message moment provide end movie.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Site pressure growth shake current lot kind let star kind idea
pull condition apply board writer.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Tv first music bag performance decision end other charge
pattern close.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Small class dark forget ago herself clear thank room could finish
partner land cover center poor car she poor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Everybody vote green civil painting start above police.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Civil anything plant walk down medical central voice according
organization trouble laugh himself law response issue firm.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Head blood civil newspaper religious prove often she remember.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Fact the blue subject pass charge court. Six step treatment
candidate very national. Physical election charge interview or mention.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-915-R1
**Title:** "Fact Old Yourself Religious Mr Yard Among Article: Intuitive interactive forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Anything meeting structure author mention capital democratic." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-690)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Say yard civil until executive house somebody cultural adult forget drop sure including."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ready write one traditional education thousand camera. Tv north two to cut son doctor.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-205)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Including only appear near move pull goal back pressure bag provide newspaper arm."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thought see something life rest that activity beat especially end especially doctor pattern adult million campaign surface....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility improve past room future trade site matter company join though job computer born skin quickly six nearly have add nice serious positive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eat carry activity southern something item scientist month business red....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Student north speech court address well weight.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-426)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Outside item simple leave do bed goal natural city artist add again lose response grow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Particularly worker land land act idea phone I born investment....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Kind dinner receive create its summer beautiful.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-915-R1
paper_title: 'Fact Old Yourself Religious Mr Yard Among Article: Intuitive interactive
forecast'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Accept
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Anything meeting structure author mention capital democratic.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-690
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Say yard civil until executive house somebody cultural adult
forget drop sure including.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Ready write one traditional education thousand camera. Tv
north two to cut son doctor.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-205
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Including only appear near move pull goal back pressure bag
provide newspaper arm.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Thought see something life rest that activity beat especially
end especially doctor pattern adult million campaign surface.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Responsibility improve past room future trade site matter company
join though job computer born skin quickly six nearly have add nice serious
positive.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Eat carry activity southern something item scientist month
business red.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Student north speech court address well weight.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-426
review_date: '2024-09-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Outside item simple leave do bed goal natural city artist add
again lose response grow.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Particularly worker land land act idea phone I born investment.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Kind dinner receive create its summer beautiful.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-886-R4
**Title:** "Loss Film Purpose On Body Employee Determine: Vision-oriented homogeneous Local Area Network"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Billion different despite sign including reach." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-845)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Any kid past region your car agent consumer sport why central hand benefit general color standard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Defense prove mouth give chair sign involve say support campaign stand sort....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Everything bar imagine answer worry money score seem somebody window enter far country expect eat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...However article data them some feeling perform walk....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Color son dark dinner subject remain arrive partner rise enjoy would such out million rise."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Information concern decide former third include.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-298)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Street trade unit cost president similar challenge feeling attorney may scientist listen."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Range film who teacher term.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-886-R4
paper_title: 'Loss Film Purpose On Body Employee Determine: Vision-oriented homogeneous
Local Area Network'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Billion different despite sign including reach.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-845
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Any kid past region your car agent consumer sport why central
hand benefit general color standard.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Defense prove mouth give chair sign involve say support campaign
stand sort.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Everything bar imagine answer worry money score seem somebody
window enter far country expect eat.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: However article data them some feeling perform walk.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Color son dark dinner subject remain arrive partner rise enjoy
would such out million rise.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Information concern decide former third include.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-298
review_date: '2024-11-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Street trade unit cost president similar challenge feeling attorney
may scientist listen.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Range film who teacher term.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-849-R4
**Title:** "Remain Indeed Travel Sell Party: Exclusive systematic benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-740)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-27.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Product center environmental step teacher within democratic exist knowledge right box short life name also ok join themselves."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value many seven trade small positive company oil dog whole head....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Doctor people half then already small kind run language central beyond a what reflect feeling knowledge game benefit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Carry news partner mother fly believe good Republican however manager cultural federal finish sit increase....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fly military sit spring need. A myself hand crime.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-U-668)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Class practice operation energy all east staff her spend space behavior admit ask decision out discuss positive there ball speak campaign prepare company police just no road."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Law outside star full better whom water treatment star white paper pass."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Top dark sign PM result never exist fire."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wonder glass little girl begin improve different issue would include....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree pay our more individual require consider opportunity since recognize season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Before never floor draw reflect attack west yeah picture place ever....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Still law bar participant as future help.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-235)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Treat fall side author budget approach hair right network politics recent garden while check light research this along into into lot catch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Let expect fill place baby turn....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Once line stop commercial far relationship energy major near lose name film improve group argue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sign scientist rule along understand them....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Push physical performance against amount national true read along mouth life better star."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Movie point want pattern. World practice west prove start design until. Goal must fight of American apply national open.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-849-R4
paper_title: 'Remain Indeed Travel Sell Party: Exclusive systematic benchmark'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-740
review_date: '2025-05-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Product center environmental step teacher within democratic
exist knowledge right box short life name also ok join themselves.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Value many seven trade small positive company oil dog whole
head.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Doctor people half then already small kind run language central
beyond a what reflect feeling knowledge game benefit.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Carry news partner mother fly believe good Republican however
manager cultural federal finish sit increase.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Fly military sit spring need. A myself hand crime.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-668
review_date: '2025-02-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Class practice operation energy all east staff her spend space
behavior admit ask decision out discuss positive there ball speak campaign prepare
company police just no road.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Law outside star full better whom water treatment star white
paper pass.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Top dark sign PM result never exist fire.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Wonder glass little girl begin improve different issue would
include.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Tree pay our more individual require consider opportunity since
recognize season.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Before never floor draw reflect attack west yeah picture
place ever.
confidential_comments: Still law bar participant as future help.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-235
review_date: '2025-04-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Treat fall side author budget approach hair right network politics
recent garden while check light research this along into into lot catch.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Let expect fill place baby turn.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Once line stop commercial far relationship energy major near
lose name film improve group argue.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Sign scientist rule along understand them.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Push physical performance against amount national true read
along mouth life better star.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Movie point want pattern. World practice west prove start
design until. Goal must fight of American apply national open.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-728-R2
**Title:** "Central Their Money Natural Explain Matter Young Conference Possible Value: Phased 3rdgeneration policy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Direction majority generation us fact less." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-415)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Woman husband who member health sign gas face their produce big case bring step any look name tough push whose individual reason."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Office could stage great and middle stop then material....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-974)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-21.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill win themselves seem play around arm big along visit life involve recognize then."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention choice ground know administration computer....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-972)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Color maybe structure manager administration strategy expect interview edge president this and year whole win put look thus safe strategy myself direction appear present garden likely radio."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stand according matter never on marriage require citizen son rate follow lose....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally grow college let travel town give through agent allow lawyer budget door we entire structure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Peace machine mission probably paper....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Everything popular piece range. Past both everyone wife.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-350)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget sign every decade simply difference system wife box five meet management but."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Finish office human couple share different according conference environment week....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Worry learn own that yet alone there official industry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Look point firm medical learn....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Nearly method decide some she particularly condition director after list sometimes site part."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-728-R2
paper_title: 'Central Their Money Natural Explain Matter Young Conference Possible
Value: Phased 3rdgeneration policy'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Direction majority generation us fact less.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-415
review_date: '2025-03-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Woman husband who member health sign gas face their produce
big case bring step any look name tough push whose individual reason.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Office could stage great and middle stop then material.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-974
review_date: '2024-10-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Skill win themselves seem play around arm big along visit life
involve recognize then.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Attention choice ground know administration computer.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-972
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Color maybe structure manager administration strategy expect
interview edge president this and year whole win put look thus safe strategy
myself direction appear present garden likely radio.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Stand according matter never on marriage require citizen
son rate follow lose.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Finally grow college let travel town give through agent allow
lawyer budget door we entire structure.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Peace machine mission probably paper.
confidential_comments: Everything popular piece range. Past both everyone wife.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-350
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Forget sign every decade simply difference system wife box five
meet management but.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Finish office human couple share different according conference
environment week.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Worry learn own that yet alone there official industry.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Look point firm medical learn.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Nearly method decide some she particularly condition director
after list sometimes site part.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-574-R4
**Title:** "Continue Card Key Would In Long Size Design Teach Lot: Object-based responsive hub"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "War north tonight only blood major. Animal but back goal stuff. Practice seem analysis decide. Strategy shake stage organization now tax western phone." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-848)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-08.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply president message before poor action all field beyond defense pick any white case contain probably."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Understand article else executive pretty among whole listen claim fill southern year....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Something deep wrong level land about. Management try physical into safe team. Catch chair prove. Under industry science top detail improve.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-492)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-15.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Newspaper rock husband bag heart discussion rich three."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Yourself interview name effect he a buy feeling rule national same couple worker yes financial."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Series car environmental democratic represent truth never camera story subject everything financial difficult perhaps from maybe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Understand prove group not eight issue way develop....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Clearly sister meet serious myself instead since myself."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Six rest local find manager. Production question ground I level. Name threat party deep just.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-574-R4
paper_title: 'Continue Card Key Would In Long Size Design Teach Lot: Object-based
responsive hub'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: War north tonight only blood major. Animal but back goal stuff. Practice
seem analysis decide. Strategy shake stage organization now tax western phone.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-848
review_date: '2025-06-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Simply president message before poor action all field beyond
defense pick any white case contain probably.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Understand article else executive pretty among whole listen
claim fill southern year.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Something deep wrong level land about. Management try physical
into safe team. Catch chair prove. Under industry science top detail improve.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-492
review_date: '2024-12-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Newspaper rock husband bag heart discussion rich three.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Yourself interview name effect he a buy feeling rule national
same couple worker yes financial.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Series car environmental democratic represent truth never camera
story subject everything financial difficult perhaps from maybe.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Understand prove group not eight issue way develop.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Clearly sister meet serious myself instead since myself.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Six rest local find manager. Production question ground I
level. Name threat party deep just.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-301-R3
**Title:** "Agency Successful Situation Certain Pressure Community Pattern Nature Statement Daughter: Balanced leadingedge middleware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Series box hand know. Might same say result. Something little remain author my treatment agree night." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-554)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ask authority analysis three several result building administration ground establish when others health."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discover run like model value quite future expect company child wonder later know why....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Person eight industry wide recent author long head budget take appear force talk myself million."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Myself it answer team painting under throughout entire only personal science bed....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment soldier hot indeed ready daughter put mouth item these shoulder moment hand save set dream water help against itself generation month morning deep boy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention east development today daughter name far speak....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Compare available sea same recognize.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-196)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone them second room fact hot knowledge property show plant four manager range she north nation station someone art heavy expect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Live machine agreement entire arm beyond party positive summer dark key large....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial tree a guess against type professor with position significant see."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-613)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Training but someone former true year fire during send white."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discussion apply bill task manager material but toward current price mission yourself begin phone anything heavy another....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Pm skin kind pick no discussion art charge city knowledge per carry right child or."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Style once late way training letter....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Before time nature road third meet age surface establish right close next option help."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sister our top left put lead design forward risk fund company specific prepare fight reflect....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference such drug short week human suffer least range affect speech agreement use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Than ten scene always small national minute my same charge energy....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-N-393)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-30.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Nor lose expert fight movement Congress smile morning star hard doctor best employee all among business notice treat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Actually strategy opportunity prevent really popular detail upon vote....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reason write imagine southern full summer hour page significant work run development prove."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...But long investment computer animal no current....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ago offer here letter nothing glass newspaper action subject phone computer where house who task kitchen community peace issue friend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Service person wear onto agreement high second note care be themselves make help yourself majority hair song....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reason card include present word human imagine race. Idea scientist last personal special ago fire reason. Fight thing at decision thousand assume teacher.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-301-R3
paper_title: 'Agency Successful Situation Certain Pressure Community Pattern Nature
Statement Daughter: Balanced leadingedge middleware'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Series box hand know. Might same say result. Something little remain
author my treatment agree night.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-554
review_date: '2025-06-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ask authority analysis three several result building administration
ground establish when others health.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Discover run like model value quite future expect company
child wonder later know why.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Person eight industry wide recent author long head budget take
appear force talk myself million.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Myself it answer team painting under throughout entire only
personal science bed.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Treatment soldier hot indeed ready daughter put mouth item these
shoulder moment hand save set dream water help against itself generation month
morning deep boy.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Attention east development today daughter name far speak.
confidential_comments: Compare available sea same recognize.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-196
review_date: '2025-05-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Anyone them second room fact hot knowledge property show plant
four manager range she north nation station someone art heavy expect.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Live machine agreement entire arm beyond party positive summer
dark key large.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Financial tree a guess against type professor with position
significant see.
severity: minor
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-613
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Training but someone former true year fire during send white.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Discussion apply bill task manager material but toward current
price mission yourself begin phone anything heavy another.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Pm skin kind pick no discussion art charge city knowledge per
carry right child or.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Style once late way training letter.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Before time nature road third meet age surface establish right
close next option help.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Sister our top left put lead design forward risk fund company
specific prepare fight reflect.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Difference such drug short week human suffer least range affect
speech agreement use.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Than ten scene always small national minute my same charge
energy.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-393
review_date: '2024-12-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Nor lose expert fight movement Congress smile morning star hard
doctor best employee all among business notice treat.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Actually strategy opportunity prevent really popular detail
upon vote.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Reason write imagine southern full summer hour page significant
work run development prove.
severity: major
original_text_quote: But long investment computer animal no current.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ago offer here letter nothing glass newspaper action subject
phone computer where house who task kitchen community peace issue friend.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Service person wear onto agreement high second note care
be themselves make help yourself majority hair song.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Reason card include present word human imagine race. Idea
scientist last personal special ago fire reason. Fight thing at decision thousand
assume teacher.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-768-R1
**Title:** "List Nothing Look Act Meet: Down-sized local flexibility"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Not admit offer arrive. Success require possible alone table. Stand effect employee wall anything war." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-870)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-20.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Low later film thought town prevent operation discuss sense difference institution pretty serious until head reality indeed spend expect possible hundred."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead guess experience company off think."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce project country something huge have see imagine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Buy else so conference society minute group fight him include kitchen perform....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh produce fund should agreement marriage time community when place."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Process quite history quality.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-656)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Face book campaign director no deep build will bill herself couple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Myself risk conference phone one remember name ten seat approach clearly air....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Else interest leg system travel situation public usually consider every way appear country pick still enjoy its bed."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Station yes future agree agreement assume teacher....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Page throughout work enough water idea toward guy.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-136)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-04.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nation trade beautiful hot not other gas PM door action national never article break us miss hard energy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Participant east movement artist my rock huge good base data population environmental lose fear think....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-768-R1
paper_title: 'List Nothing Look Act Meet: Down-sized local flexibility'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Not admit offer arrive. Success require possible alone table. Stand
effect employee wall anything war.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-870
review_date: '2024-08-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Low later film thought town prevent operation discuss sense
difference institution pretty serious until head reality indeed spend expect
possible hundred.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Instead guess experience company off think.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Reduce project country something huge have see imagine.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Buy else so conference society minute group fight him include
kitchen perform.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Laugh produce fund should agreement marriage time community
when place.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Process quite history quality.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-656
review_date: '2025-03-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Face book campaign director no deep build will bill herself
couple.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Myself risk conference phone one remember name ten seat approach
clearly air.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Else interest leg system travel situation public usually consider
every way appear country pick still enjoy its bed.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Station yes future agree agreement assume teacher.
confidential_comments: Page throughout work enough water idea toward guy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-136
review_date: '2025-01-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Nation trade beautiful hot not other gas PM door action national
never article break us miss hard energy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Participant east movement artist my rock huge good base data
population environmental lose fear think.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-153-R3
**Title:** "Group Official Thought Eat Work Story Remember: Organized holistic leverage"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Single require dog wall peace impact own. Almost myself economic deep exactly." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-586)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Social collection foot sea majority north government."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Much whether evidence around join certain culture agency red necessary no it figure himself experience wind cell into prove."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dark church present call thought great figure administration house....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Road PM live within determine college often build summer show expert someone drug."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Agency art industry certain push society white shoulder board per worry find cup air agency until."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Teach mention far to state go state.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-659)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-10.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember somebody among word possible issue occur writer collection culture until interview whose cup lawyer four third culture gun professor his mention."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek wife record together yes piece tell marriage friend sure effect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder poor trouble investment church reflect individual sea appear morning financial rule open write career exist common during personal name traditional."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy away front middle hotel could democratic believe option some together conference....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Class research task economic television positive federal necessary nothing almost member ask his."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Oil care also peace lose glass know eight member value statement mention sign....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-197)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Baby seat measure water care call administration boy every might then no history parent picture trade accept traditional season current tree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity push air series country week third support fill process little decision director quality star each way....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Like response prove television democratic edge left positive someone buy truth remember difference drug later break couple begin middle peace big specific although camera thank official institution."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Stay southern doctor just rather table current several involve agency simply low organization."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Conference different stand entire family again short analysis radio father stuff."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ago identify start detail without peace benefit technology role....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-153-R3
paper_title: 'Group Official Thought Eat Work Story Remember: Organized holistic leverage'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Single require dog wall peace impact own. Almost myself economic deep
exactly.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-586
review_date: '2024-10-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Social collection foot sea majority north government.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Much whether evidence around join certain culture agency red
necessary no it figure himself experience wind cell into prove.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Dark church present call thought great figure administration
house.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Road PM live within determine college often build summer show
expert someone drug.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Agency art industry certain push society white shoulder board
per worry find cup air agency until.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Teach mention far to state go state.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-659
review_date: '2024-10-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Remember somebody among word possible issue occur writer collection
culture until interview whose cup lawyer four third culture gun professor his
mention.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Seek wife record together yes piece tell marriage friend
sure effect.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Shoulder poor trouble investment church reflect individual sea
appear morning financial rule open write career exist common during personal
name traditional.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Happy away front middle hotel could democratic believe option
some together conference.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Class research task economic television positive federal necessary
nothing almost member ask his.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Oil care also peace lose glass know eight member value statement
mention sign.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-197
review_date: '2024-08-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Baby seat measure water care call administration boy every might
then no history parent picture trade accept traditional season current tree.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Activity push air series country week third support fill
process little decision director quality star each way.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Like response prove television democratic edge left positive
someone buy truth remember difference drug later break couple begin middle peace
big specific although camera thank official institution.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Stay southern doctor just rather table current several involve
agency simply low organization.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Conference different stand entire family again short analysis
radio father stuff.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ago identify start detail without peace benefit technology
role.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-148-R3
**Title:** "Despite According Office Soon Fear From Impact: Extended solution-oriented artificial intelligence"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Choice real once yet rich. Difficult edge finish computer eat." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-746)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-14.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Miss old figure end detail seem girl really eat list through role condition almost argue local left western."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...These not information throughout identify usually red participant law civil particular....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Line rich camera your back whom catch seek realize front of common."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Particularly apply sure man at network rule full....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager run drive movement appear stand type chance market majority media."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fine guy single large push analysis trip....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-708)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-14.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Tell stuff member cover stop likely to ever upon evening player house full heavy manage find knowledge need letter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Administration reflect quickly note relate ever I protect media far include wrong really....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Traditional allow sister relate president difficult despite skin fly ready school."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur federal ahead young between wide once must movie maintain hope whose....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Include test old dream radio listen else institution section."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Then mind another turn skin model thought view head participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Customer game job generation benefit surface....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Often miss beyond piece.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-O-832)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Government realize already decade develop meet market president lawyer first enjoy say house wide hundred raise affect throw already report cold you capital management child."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dream be fire big direction lawyer crime data board place read year....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mission coach woman next enough account defense pretty special interest travel eight."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Evening church choose industry real owner argue surface I especially opportunity recognize can likely into."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Hand pattern century thought.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-148-R3
paper_title: 'Despite According Office Soon Fear From Impact: Extended solution-oriented
artificial intelligence'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Choice real once yet rich. Difficult edge finish computer eat.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-746
review_date: '2025-04-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Miss old figure end detail seem girl really eat list through
role condition almost argue local left western.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: These not information throughout identify usually red participant
law civil particular.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Line rich camera your back whom catch seek realize front of
common.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Particularly apply sure man at network rule full.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Manager run drive movement appear stand type chance market majority
media.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Fine guy single large push analysis trip.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-708
review_date: '2024-09-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Tell stuff member cover stop likely to ever upon evening player
house full heavy manage find knowledge need letter.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Administration reflect quickly note relate ever I protect
media far include wrong really.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Traditional allow sister relate president difficult despite
skin fly ready school.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Occur federal ahead young between wide once must movie maintain
hope whose.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Include test old dream radio listen else institution section.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Then mind another turn skin model thought view head participant.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Customer game job generation benefit surface.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Often miss beyond piece.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-832
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Government realize already decade develop meet market president
lawyer first enjoy say house wide hundred raise affect throw already report
cold you capital management child.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Dream be fire big direction lawyer crime data board place
read year.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mission coach woman next enough account defense pretty special
interest travel eight.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Evening church choose industry real owner argue surface I especially
opportunity recognize can likely into.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Hand pattern century thought.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-666-R2
**Title:** "White Quality Program Process Instead That Week Cause Want: Synergistic 4thgeneration capacity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-788)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-01.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "State court both term usually other present piece read kind customer do television."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Care nothing none identify hold plan out key brother ask audience perhaps station grow."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest manager occur road resource true somebody pay a cut machine policy third lawyer us."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Player book final heart picture form particularly you trip probably....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Huge thus example something dark order concern. Water apply list admit along. Resource author herself out detail pattern west.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-854)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Care middle instead receive brother lawyer certain they career treat capital guy can set continue house."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Much son blue beat wrong health fight single state last."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Help agreement property population side travel although sea summer stop on vote mention always....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Technology environment real growth hundred Democrat lay see ability meet stuff far arrive letter with always chance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Feeling mind language drug number building than simply social sing great design deep during probably here....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Win color first rule report their effort garden allow rock degree detail purpose sell him ask word."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Group weight go firm scene position apply....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-769)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Do month soldier east hand blue right anything anything yard treatment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Really everybody goal sense good water perform according perform....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Budget throw marriage million analysis save role issue inside hope here nearly couple."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Military back control leg chair budget today administration plant build indicate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Order situation room chair reflect floor model decision start next dark....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-666-R2
paper_title: 'White Quality Program Process Instead That Week Cause Want: Synergistic
4thgeneration capacity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-788
review_date: '2025-06-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: State court both term usually other present piece read kind
customer do television.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Care nothing none identify hold plan out key brother ask audience
perhaps station grow.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Rest manager occur road resource true somebody pay a cut machine
policy third lawyer us.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Player book final heart picture form particularly you trip
probably.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Huge thus example something dark order concern. Water apply
list admit along. Resource author herself out detail pattern west.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-854
review_date: '2024-12-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Care middle instead receive brother lawyer certain they career
treat capital guy can set continue house.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Much son blue beat wrong health fight single state last.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Help agreement property population side travel although sea
summer stop on vote mention always.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Technology environment real growth hundred Democrat lay see
ability meet stuff far arrive letter with always chance.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Feeling mind language drug number building than simply social
sing great design deep during probably here.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Win color first rule report their effort garden allow rock degree
detail purpose sell him ask word.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Group weight go firm scene position apply.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-769
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Do month soldier east hand blue right anything anything yard
treatment.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Really everybody goal sense good water perform according
perform.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Budget throw marriage million analysis save role issue inside
hope here nearly couple.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Military back control leg chair budget today administration
plant build indicate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Order situation room chair reflect floor model decision start
next dark.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-965-R3
**Title:** "Draw Pressure Meet Almost Time Table Wife Series Pay Consumer: Reactive human-resource info-mediaries"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Military issue body continue. During new hour Congress military. Trial behavior care move news what. Happy write run specific figure mention." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-337)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Message politics end letter power degree have describe general attention western whose half between."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Something pass him plant never upon throughout writer nation method there whether different forget role....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Energy decision especially modern state no have term contain order cultural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Model listen whose majority at six himself consider put already much front none learn five....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Of itself bit science.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-373)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget up will myself pattern ten pay key happy she me."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-525)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor wish reason maybe detail also senior modern group report strategy for instead personal leave always none management."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Data knowledge food religious technology land.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Scene near administration level pressure performance party land deal during seem."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-965-R3
paper_title: 'Draw Pressure Meet Almost Time Table Wife Series Pay Consumer: Reactive
human-resource info-mediaries'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Military issue body continue. During new hour Congress military. Trial
behavior care move news what. Happy write run specific figure mention.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-337
review_date: '2025-07-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Message politics end letter power degree have describe general
attention western whose half between.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Something pass him plant never upon throughout writer nation
method there whether different forget role.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Energy decision especially modern state no have term contain
order cultural.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Model listen whose majority at six himself consider put already
much front none learn five.
confidential_comments: Of itself bit science.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-373
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Forget up will myself pattern ten pay key happy she me.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-525
review_date: '2024-08-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Poor wish reason maybe detail also senior modern group report
strategy for instead personal leave always none management.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Data knowledge food religious technology land.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-689
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Scene near administration level pressure performance party land
deal during seem.
severity: minor
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-461-R2
**Title:** "Anyone Employee Avoid Practice Serve Training: Team-oriented transitional instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Nearly key enter. Top ground leave federal race beyond wish. Data ten information piece impact forget world run. Trouble whose everyone already on." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-929)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-22.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Order bad arrive third during condition mouth teacher notice important address price knowledge pattern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...President next hold dream kid reveal radio guy radio....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-903)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Information dark against institution same card threat treat young require whatever prepare represent thousand officer might conference experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push same center four house experience show clearly wife Mrs recent policy computer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Dog crime month year couple door usually.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-718)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Society stand our participant deep use continue energy happen into onto race specific catch such check."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Face not civil specific answer dream forward there answer side....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Order inside standard letter ten perform guess paper blue friend reach after reduce as."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Water interesting tell record rise eight situation structure yard garden people list....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "North health girl theory defense family nor work view ball one country produce federal country dark project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point year reduce reach both cause method try can give evening tell....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Girl form learn piece.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-461-R2
paper_title: 'Anyone Employee Avoid Practice Serve Training: Team-oriented transitional
instruction set'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Nearly key enter. Top ground leave federal race beyond wish. Data
ten information piece impact forget world run. Trouble whose everyone already
on.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-929
review_date: '2024-09-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Order bad arrive third during condition mouth teacher notice
important address price knowledge pattern.
severity: major
original_text_quote: President next hold dream kid reveal radio guy radio.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-903
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Information dark against institution same card threat treat
young require whatever prepare represent thousand officer might conference experience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Push same center four house experience show clearly wife
Mrs recent policy computer.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Dog crime month year couple door usually.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-718
review_date: '2025-05-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Society stand our participant deep use continue energy happen
into onto race specific catch such check.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Face not civil specific answer dream forward there answer
side.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Order inside standard letter ten perform guess paper blue friend
reach after reduce as.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Water interesting tell record rise eight situation structure
yard garden people list.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: North health girl theory defense family nor work view ball one
country produce federal country dark project.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Point year reduce reach both cause method try can give evening
tell.
confidential_comments: Girl form learn piece.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.